Search

Background: Suprascapular neurodynamic tests are used to clinically test for suprascapular nerve mechanosensitivity. Various tests described in the literature are proposed to induce suprascapular nerve mechanical strain but their potential effects on nerve strain have not been established., Methods: This observational cadaveric study used biomechanical measurements to evaluate and compare the strain undergone by the suprascapular nerve during five different neurodynamic positions: (1) Cervical contralateral rotation and scapular retraction; (2) Cervical contralateral sidebending + shoulder girdle depression; (3) Shoulder girdle depression, retraction, posterior tilt and downward rotation; (4) Position 3 + contralateral cervical sidebending; and (5) Scapular protraction + Cervical contralateral sidebending (protraction sidebending test). Suprascapular nerve strains were measured using two differential transducers, one placed before the nerve entry by the suprascapular notch (prescapular portion) and the second after the spine of the scapula in the infraspinal fossa (scapular portion)., Findings: Prescapular portion: all 5 positions induced a mean strain increase of 22.70 % (95 %CI 17.14, 28.26) with no significant differences between positions (p > 0.05). Scapular portion: the protraction sidebending test provoked the highest strain increase of 8.99 % (95 %CI 6.83, 11.15), significantly greater than the other positions (p < 0.05)., Interpretation: All 5 positions increased suprascapular nerve strain of the prescapular portion of the suprascapular nerve. The protraction sidebending test induced the highest strain of the scapular portion of the nerve. As it is likely to influence both portions of the suprascapular nerve, the protraction sidebending test is the most suitable neurodynamic test to test for suprascapular heightened mechanosensitivity., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment priority in C5, C6, and C7 brachial plexus root avulsion is the recovery of shoulder function through reinnervation of shoulder muscles. The medial pectoral nerve is a potential donor for axillary nerve transfer, but outcomes are sparsely reported. This study reports the results of medial pectoral nerve transfer to the axillary nerve., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 12 patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury (C5, C6, and C7 root avulsion) who underwent medial pectoral nerve transfer to the axillary nerve. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including electromyography findings, were documented. We assessed postoperative shoulder abduction strength and range of motion. Statistical analyses compared presurgery and postsurgery outcomes and contrasted our results with those from a study using spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve., Results: Postsurgery, the mean shoulder abduction range of motion was 65.45°, with a median strength of M2. Significant improvement was noted compared to preoperative values. However, outcomes did not significantly surpass those from spinal accessory nerve transfer. Electromyography showed a low incidence of motor unit action potentials in the deltoid., Conclusions: Medial pectoral nerve transfer to the axillary nerve did not yield superior results in shoulder abduction and deltoid reinnervation in our group of patients. At present, different nerve donors may also need to be considered for deltoid muscle reinnervation in patients with C5, C6, and C7 root avulsion to achieve better shoulder abduction recovery., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Shoulder function after spinal nerve grafting in pan-brachial plexus injuries (pan-BPI) is not well described. The authors evaluated shoulder abduction (ABD) and external rotation (ER) after spinal nerve grafting to the suprascapular nerve, axillary nerve, or posterior division of the upper trunk and determined patient characteristics, injury severity and characteristics, and nerve graft factors that influenced outcomes., Methods: A total of 362 patients undergoing pan-BPI reconstruction and spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation in a single institution between 2001 and 2018 were reviewed. Patient demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), graft characteristics, strength, range of motion for shoulder ABD and ER, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on recovery of shoulder function: no return, ABD only, and ABD and ER., Results: A total of 110 patients underwent spinal nerve grafting, with 41 meeting inclusion criteria. Seventeen (41.5%) had no return of shoulder function, 14 (34.1%) had ABD alone, and 10 (24.4%) had ABD and ER. Patients with recovery of both ABD and ER were significantly younger (18.6 ± 5.56 years), had lower body mass index (22.4 ± 4.0), and had a lower ISS (10.5 ± 6.24; P = 0.003). Multivariable analysis found that with increasing age (OR, 0.786; 95% CI, 0.576, 0.941) and ISS (OR, 0.820; 95% CI, 0.606, 0.979), odds for return of ABD and ER decreased significantly., Conclusions: In pan-BPI, 24.4% of patients demonstrated return of both ABD and ER after spinal nerve grafting to suprascapular nerve and either axillary nerve or posterior division of the upper trunk. Age, body mass index, and ISS were associated with poorer recovery of shoulder function. Careful patient selection and consideration of age, body mass index, and ISS may improve outcomes of spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, III., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Conventionally, neural transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve for shoulder abduction in traumatic brachial plexus injury is performed via the anterior approach. However, important advantages of the posterior approach have made it an alternative option, such as the proximity of neural coaptation to the muscle to be reinnervated and negating the effects of a second injury to the suprascapular nerve., Methods: Retrospective data was collected from 30 patients with brachial plexus injury who underwent spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer over 4 years. There were 15 patients in the anterior-approach group (group A) and 15 in the posterior-approach group (group B). Functional outcome at the shoulder was measured as muscle power and active range of motion at 18 months, and data on patients' satisfaction levels and surgeons' perceptions was also collected., Results: No statistical difference was found in the muscle strength achieved in the 2 groups (P = 0.34), but significant recovery was found in the external rotation achieved by group B (P = 0.02). Statistical difference was insignificant in the 2 groups' active range of motion during abduction and external rotation. The satisfaction index of patients was 86.7% in group B as compared to 68% in group A. Surgeons' perspective showed a faster speed of suprascapular nerve exploration in the posterior approach, with better visibility of supraspinatus muscle contraction, and overall surgeons preferred the posterior approach., Conclusions: External rotation at the shoulder is better via the posterior approach, but no difference in abduction was noted. Patients who underwent the posterior approach were more satisfied with the recovery, and surgeons preferred the posterior approach., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Suprascapular nerve entrapment (SNE) syndrome is a commonly overlooked cause of shoulder weakness and pain. It frequently causes weakness over the posterior and lateral and posterior aspects of the shoulder, as well as pain of infraspinatus muscles. Therefore, we considered that the infraspinatus muscle cross-sectional area (IMCSA) might be a new morphological parameter to analyze SNE syndrome. We assumed that the IMCSA is an important morphologic parameter in SNE syndrome diagnosis. We acquired infraspinatus muscle data from 10 patients with SNE syndrome and from 10 healthy subjects who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder and who revealed no evidence of SNE syndrome. We analyzed the infraspinatus muscle thickness (IMT) and IMCSA at the shoulder on the imaging of the shoulder using our image analysis program. The IMCSA was measured as the whole infraspinatus muscle cross-sectional area that was most atrophied in the sagittal S-MR images. The IMT was measured as the thickest level of infraspinatus muscle. The mean IMT was 29.17 ± 2.81 mm in the healthy subjects and 25.22 ± 3.19 mm in the SNE syndrome group. The mean IMCSA was 1321.95 ± 175.91 mm2 in the healthy group and 1048.38 ± 259.94 mm2 in the SNE syndrome group. SNE syndrome patients had significantly lower IMT (P < .001) and IMCSA (P < .001) than the healthy group. The ROC curve shows that the optimal cutoff point of the IMT was 26.74 mm, with 70.0% sensitivity, 70.0% specificity, and an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.65-1.00). The best cutoff value of the IMCSA was 1151.02 mm2, with 80.0% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, and AUC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.69-1.00). The IMT and IMCSA were both significantly associated with SNE syndrome. And the IMCSA was a highly sensitive diagnostic tool., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purpose: Shoulder surgeries, vital for diverse pathologies, pose a risk of iatrogenic nerve damage. Existing literature lacks diverse bone landmark-specific nerve position data. The purpose of this study is to address this gap by investigating such relationships., Method: This cadaveric study examines axillary, radial and suprascapular nerves' relation with acromion, coracoid and greater tuberosity of the humerus (GT). It also correlates this data with humeral lengths and explores nerve dynamics in relation to arm positions., Results: The mean distance from the axillary nerve to (i) GT was 4.38 cm (range 3.32-5.44, SD 0.53), (ii) acromion was 6.42 cm (range 5.03-7.8, SD 0.694) and (iii) coracoid process was 4.3 cm (range 2.76-5.84, SD 0.769). Abduction brought the nerve closer by 0.36 cm, 0.35 cm and 0.53 cm, respectively. The mean distance from radial nerve to (i) GT was 5.46 cm (range 3.78-7.14, SD 0.839), (ii) acromion was 7.82 cm (range 5.4-10.24, SD 1.21) and (iii) tip of the coracoid process was 6.09 cm (range 4.07-8.11 cm, SD 1.01). The mean distance from the suprascapular nerve to the acromion was 4.2 cm (range 3.1-5.4, SD 0.575). The mean humeral length was noted to be 27.83 cm (range 25.3-30.7, SD 1.13). There was no significant correlation between these distances and humeral lengths., Conclusion: It is essential to exercise caution to avoid axillary nerve damage during the abduction manoeuvre, as its distance from the greater tuberosity and tip of the coracoid process has shown a significant reduction. The safe margins, in relation to the length of the humerus and consequently the patient's stature, exhibit no significant variation. In situations where the greater tuberosity (GT) and the border of the acromion are inaccessible due to reasons such as trauma, the tip of the coracoid process can serve as a dependable bone landmark for establishing a secure surgical margin., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.)

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to compare pain intensity after pulsed radiofrequency (RF) or suprascapular nerve block for the treatment of chronic shoulder pain. The secondary objectives were to compare the shoulder range of motion and supplementary analgesic requirement., Methods: This randomized and prospective study included 40 patients, with chronic shoulder pain allocated into 2 groups. One group underwent pulsed RF, and the other group was submitted to block (B) of the suprascapular nerve, guided by ultrasound. They were assessed for 12 weeks regarding pain intensity, the need for analgesia supplementation, and shoulder range of motion. Side effects were recorded., Results: Pain intensity on movement was lower in the RF group after 2, 4, and 8 weeks. At rest, pain intensity was lower in group RF than in group B after 12 weeks. Pain intensity was lower than before the procedure at all times evaluated, in both groups. There was no difference between groups in the range of motion. There was a need for tramadol supplementation in 1 patient in group RF and 2 in group B. Adverse effects observed were local pain (RF: 1), hematoma (RF: 1; B: 1), and lipothymia (B: 2)., Discussion: Pulsed RF on the suprascapular nerve promoted an analgesic effect for 12 weeks. Regarding the intensity of pain on movement and at rest, there was a trend toward a better effect with RF than with nerve blockage treatment. In both groups, there was a reduction in pain intensity without serious adverse effects., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In brachial plexus surgery, a key focus is restoring shoulder abduction through spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer using either the anterior or posterior approach. However, no published randomised control trials have directly compared their outcomes to date. Therefore, our study aims to assess motor outcomes for both approaches. Methods: This study comprises two groups of patients. Group A: anterior approach (29 patients), Group B: Posterior approach (29 patients). Patients were allocated to both groups using selective randomisation with the sealed envelope technique. Functional outcome was assessed by grading the muscle power of shoulder abductors using the British Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. Results: Five patients who were operated on by posterior approach had ossified superior transverse suprascapular ligament. In these cases, the approach was changed from posterior to anterior to avoid injury to SSN. Due to this reason, the treatment analysis was done considering the distribution as: Group A: 34, Group B: 24. The mean duration of appearance of first clinical sign of shoulder abduction was 8.16 months in Group A, whereas in Group B, it was 6.85 months, which was significantly earlier ( p < 0.05). At the 18-month follow-up, both intention-to-treat analysis and as-treated analysis were performed, and there was no statistical difference in the outcome of shoulder abduction between the approaches for SAN to SSN nerve transfer. Conclusions: Our study found no significant difference in the restoration of shoulder abduction power between both approaches; therefore, either approach can be used for patients presenting early for surgery. Since the appearance of first clinical sign of recovery is earlier in posterior approach, therefore, it can be preferred for cases presenting at a later stage. Also, the choice of approach is guided on a case to case basis depending on clavicular fractures and surgeon preference to the approach. Level of Evidence: Level II (Therapeutic).

Background: The suprascapular nerve (SSN) is an important nerve that contributes to shoulder joint sensation and movement. The anterior suprascapular nerve block (aSSNB) has the potential for noninferior analgesic effect compared with the interscalene block while preserving respiratory function. This study investigated the median effective volume (MEV) of 0.375% ropivacaine in aSSNB for analgesic effect among patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery., Objectives: Our primary objective was the MEV. The secondary objectives included the 24 hour sufentanil consumption, 24 hour patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) presses, and incidences of diaphragm impairment., Study Design: Prospective registered (ChiCTR2300070129), single-armed, volume-finding study., Setting: This study was conducted in a tertiary, single center., Methods: There were 23 patients who completed the study. Using an up-and-down process, patients enrolled in the study received different volumes of 0.375% ropivacaine for an aSSNB adjusted based on the success or failure of the previous patient in the study's block by increasing or decreasing the volume by 3 mL. The first patient received 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine. The nerve blocks were evaluated by the sensory score of the C5 and C6 dermatomes., Results: MEV50 (50% of the patients) was 6 mL (95% CI, 5.78 - 6.78 mL), and MEV95 (95% of the patients) was 13.88 mL (95% CI, 13.37 - 14.87 mL). There was no significant difference in the PCA presses, 24 hour sufentanil consumption, and incidences of diaphragm impairments between successful and unsuccessful blocks., Limitations: Our study focused on the analgesic effect rather than hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis with 0.375% ropivacaine for an aSSNB. The study also did not test varying ropivacaine concentrations while keeping the volume constant. Further investigation with varying concentrations and a larger sample size is indicated to address the optimal volume and concentration to balance analgesia and diaphragm function., Conclusions: To produce effective analgesic effect, the MEV50 is 6 mL, and the MEV95 is 13.88 mL in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery who receive an aSSNB using 0.375% ropivacaine for analgesia.

Background: Shoulder syndrome can be reduced by preserving the spinal accessory nerve (SAN). However, it is unclear whether performing level IIb preservation will decrease the risk of SAN injury and shoulder syndrome., Aims/objectives: We investigated whether neck dissection with level IIb preservation can reduce shoulder dysfunction and postoperative quality of life (QOL) in head and neck cancer patients., Material and Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled patients who underwent neck dissection from 2011 to 2014. Patients were divided into three groups (level IIb preservation group [group 1], IIb dissection group [group 2], and IIb and V dissection group [group 3]). Postoperative shoulder function and QOL were evaluated among the three groups., Results: There were a total of 35 neck sides in three groups, with nine neck sides in group 1, 16 neck sides in group 2, and 10 neck sides in group 3. Although the results showed less shoulder dysfunction in group 1 at early postoperative period. The QOL in group 1 was preserved in the early postoperative period., Conclusions and Significance: Neck dissection with level IIb preservation may help reduce shoulder syndrome and maintain QOL in the early postoperative period.

Background: Supraclavicular nerve injury is usually at risk during clavicular fracture fixation. This study aimed to examine the anatomical features and estimate the precise location of supraclavicular nerve branches related to adjacent structural landmarks and to evaluate the differences between sex and side. To highlight the clinical purposes and surgical relevance, this study attempted to define a surgical safe zone that would probably protect the supraclavicular nerve during clavicle fixation., Method: A total of 64 shoulders obtained from 15 female and 17 male adult cadavers were examined, identifying the branching patterns of the supraclavicular nerve, measuring the clavicle length and the course of the supraclavicular nerve referring to the sternoclavicular (SC) and acromioclavicular (AC) joint. Data were categorized by sex and side, and their differences were evaluated using Student T-Test and Mann-Whitney U Test. Clinically relevant predictable safe zones were also statistically analyzed., Result: The results revealed 7 branching patterns of the supraclavicular nerve. The medial and lateral nerve branches formed a shared trunk, and the medial nerve branches separated to form the intermediate branch, i.e., the most frequent pattern (67.19%). The safe zones were determined to be 6.1 mm among both sexes of the SC joint medially, and 0.7 mm among females and 0 mm among males of the AC joint laterally. Surgical incisions between 29.3 to 51.2% and 60.5 to 79.7% of the clavicle length from the SC joint were the safe zones at the midclavicular shaft among both sexes., Conclusion: The findings of this study have provided new insights into the anatomy of the supraclavicular nerve and its variations. It has been revealed that the terminal branches of the nerve consistently pass over the clavicle in a predictable pattern, emphasizing the importance of considering the supraclavicular nerve's safe zones during clinically relevant surgeries. Nevertheless, due to individual anatomical variations, meticulous dissection between these safe zones is necessary to avoid iatrogenic nerve injury among patients., Level of Evidence: Basic Science Study, Anatomic Study., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Among high-speed sports, an increased number of high-speed injuries have been observed in alpine downhill racing. We report the case of a young professional ski racer who sustained a shoulder dislocation with an avulsion of the axillary nerve during a World Cup race. After initial treatment was provided for the shoulder dislocation, the patient was left with abduction weakness and a sensory deficit in the region of the deltoid muscle. She underwent electrophysiological and clinical examinations and visited our centre with delay. We immediately performed surgical treatment with a nerve transfer and nerve transplantation. After only 11 months following her fall, she was able to resume her training program. This case report shows the importance of early diagnostic investigation, a visit to a centre of plastic surgery and the good outcome after surgical treatment in patients with peripheral nerve injuries., Competing Interests: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Dual nerve transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve (SAN-SSN) and the radial nerve to the axillary nerve is considered to be the most feasible method of restoration of shoulder abduction in brachial plexus injuries. Supraspinatus muscle plays an important role in the initiation of abduction and its functional restoration is crucial for shoulder movements. There are two possible approaches for the SAN-SSN transfer: the more conventional anterior approach and the posterior approach in the area of scapular spine, which allows more distal neurotization. Although the dual nerve transfer is a widely used method, it is unclear which approach for the SAN-SSN transfer results in better outcomes. We conducted a search of English literature from January 2001 to December 2021 using the PRISMA guidelines. Twelve studies with a total 142 patients met our inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the approach used: Group A included patients who underwent the anterior approach, and Group B included patients who underwent the posterior approach. Abduction strength using the Medical Research Scale (MRC) and range of motion (ROM) were assessed. The average MRC grade was 3.57 ± 1.08 in Group A and 4.0 ± 0.65 (p = 0.65) in Group B. The average ROM was 114.6 ± 36.7 degrees in Group A and 103.4 ± 37.2 degrees in Group B (p = 0.247). In conclusion, we did not find statistically significant differences between SAN-SSN transfers performed from the anterior or posterior approach in patients undergoing dual neurotization technique for restoration of shoulder abduction.

Background: Restoration of shoulder function in obstetrical brachial plexus injury is paramount. There remains debate as to the optimal method of upper trunk reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer leads to improved shoulder external rotation relative to sural nerve grafting., Methods: A systematic review of Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO CINAHL, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and TRIP Pro from inception was conducted. Our primary outcome was shoulder external rotation., Results: Four studies were included. Nerve transfer was associated with greater shoulder external rotation relative to nerve grafting (mean difference: 0.82 AMS 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-1.36, P < .005). Patients undergoing nerve grafting were more likely to undergo a secondary shoulder stabilizing procedure (odds ratio [OR]: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.8376-1.9268)., Conclusion: In obstetrical brachial plexus injury, nerve transfer is associated with improved shoulder external rotation and a lower rate of secondary shoulder surgery., Level of Evidence: Level III; Therapeutic.

Background: Anterior glenohumeral dislocation is a common injury seen in the emergency department (ED) that sometimes requires procedural sedation for manual reduction. When compared with procedural sedation for dislocation reductions, peripheral nerve blocks provide similar patient satisfaction scores but have shorter ED length of stays. In this case report, we describe the first addition of an ultrasound-guided axillary nerve block to a suprascapular nerve block for reduction of an anterior shoulder dislocation in the ED., Case Report: A 34-year-old man presented to the ED with an acute left shoulder dislocation. The patient was a fit rock climber with developed muscular build and tone. An attempt to reduce the shoulder with peripheral analgesia was unsuccessful. A combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block was performed with 0.5% bupivacaine, allowing appropriate relaxation of the patient's musculature while providing excellent pain control. The shoulder was then successfully reduced without procedural sedation. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Procedural sedation for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations is time consuming, resource intensive, and can be risky in some populations. The addition of an axillary nerve block to a suprascapular nerve block allows for more complete muscle relaxation to successfully reduce a shoulder dislocation without procedural sedation., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of triceps motor branch to axillary nerve transfers and to identify prognostic factors which may influence these outcomes., Methods: A retrospective cohort included all patients who underwent a triceps motor branch to axillary nerve transfer (2010-2019) with at least 12 months of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was shoulder abduction strength assessed with British Medical Research Council (MRC) grade., Results: Ten patients were included with a mean follow-up of 19.1 (SD 5.9) months. Compared with preoperative MRC shoulder abduction strength (0.2 SD 0.4), patients significantly improved postoperatively (2.8 SD 1.6; P = .005). Increased body mass index (BMI) was significantly associated with worse postoperative MRC ( P = .014)., Conclusion: Triceps motor branch to axillary nerve transfer is a beneficial procedure for restoring shoulder function in patients presenting with either isolated axillary nerve or brachial plexus pathology. Patients with elevated BMI may not have as robust strength recovery and should be counseled carefully regarding prognosis.

Background: The external rotation and abduction of shoulder are considered one of the priorities of reconstruction in brachial plexus injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional results and complications of shoulder arthrodesis in patients with brachial plexus injury to better comprehend the benefits of this procedure., Methods: Between 2015 and 2019, 15 shoulder arthrodesis were performed in patients with long-standing brachial plexus injury. The main indication for arthrodesis was absent or poor recovery of shoulder abduction and external rotation. Patients presented different levels of injury. Shoulder measurements of active abduction and external rotation were made based on image records of the patients. A long 4.5-mm reconstruction plate was fit along the scapular spine, acromion, and lateral proximal third of the humerus. Structured bone graft was fit into the subacromial space., Results: The mean preoperative abduction was 16°, and the mean postoperative abduction was 42°. The mean preoperative external rotation was -59°, and the mean postoperative external rotation was -13°. The mean increase in abduction and external rotation was 25° and 45°, respectively. Bone union was achieved in all cases at an average time of 5.23 months. We experienced humeral fractures in 26.66% of the cases, which were all successfully treated nonoperatively., Conclusions: Shoulder arthrodesis is a rewarding procedure for patients with brachial plexus injuries. A marked improvement in the upper limb positioning was observed in all patients. It should be considered as the main therapeutic option in cases where nerve reconstruction is no longer possible.

Background: Interscalene brachial plexus block is associated with phrenic nerve paralysis. The objective of this study was to evaluate an alternative approach to interscalene brachial plexus blocks in terms of efficacy, grade of motor and sensory blockade, and phrenic nerve blockade., Methods: The study was prospective and interventional. The ten living patients studied were 18 to 65 years old, ASA physical status I or II, and submitted to correction of rotator cuff injury. A superior trunk blockade was performed at the superior trunk below the omohyoid muscle, without blocking the phrenic nerve. The needle was advanced below the prevertebral layer until contacting the superior trunk. In order to guarantee the correct positioning of the needle tip, an intracluster pattern of the spread was visualized. The block was performed with 5.ßmL of 0.5% bupivacaine in ten patients. In the six cadavers, 5.ßmL of methylene blue was injected. Diaphragmatic excursion was assessed by ultrasonography of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm. In three patients, pulmonary ventilation was evaluated with impedance tomography. Pain scores and analgesic consumption were assessed in the recovery room for 6.ßhours after the blockade., Results: In the six cadavers, methylene blue didn...t reach the phrenic nerve. Ten patients underwent arthroscopic surgery, and no clinically phrenic nerve paralysis was observed. No patient reported pain during the first 6.ßhours., Conclusions: This study suggests that this new superior trunk approach to block the superior trunk may be an alternative technique to promote analgesia for shoulder surgery in patients with impaired respiratory function., (Copyright © 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We aimed to analyze changes in suprascapular nerve (SSN) position within the suprascapular notch during in vivo shoulder abduction., Materials and Methods: Three-dimensional models of the shoulder complex were constructed based on magnetic resonance imaging of the brachial plexus (BP-MR) in a patient diagnosed with SSN dysfunction but normal scapular movement. Using BP-MR in neutral position and computed tomography data on shoulder abduction, shoulder abduction was simulated as the transition between two positions of the shoulder complex with overlapping of a neutral and abducted scapula. SSN movement during abduction was evaluated using the finite element method. Contact stress on the SSN was measured in the presence and absence of the transverse scapular ligament (TSL)., Results: In the neutral position, the SSN ran almost parallel to the front of the TSL until entering the suprascapular notch and slightly contacted the anterior-inferior border of the TSL. As shoulder abduction progressed, contact stress decreased due to gradual loss of contact with the TSL. In the TSL-free scapula, there was no contact stress on the SSN in the neutral position. Towards the end of shoulder abduction, contact stress increased again as the SSN began to contact the base of the suprascapular notch in both TSL conditions., Conclusion: We identified changes in the position of the SSN path within the suprascapular notch during shoulder abduction. The SSN starts in contact with the TSL and moves toward the base of the suprascapular notch with secondary contact. These findings may provide rationale for TSL release in SSN entrapment., Competing Interests: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (© Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022.)

Background: Since 2007, the authors have performed the triceps-to-axillary nerve transfer using the medial triceps branch to reconstruct axillary nerve function in brachial plexus and isolated axillary nerve palsies., Methods: A retrospective chart review was undertaken of patients reconstructed with this transfer, recording patient and injury demographics and time to surgery. Preoperative and postoperative function was graded using the Medical Research Council scale and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire., Results: Postoperatively, 31 patients (64.6 percent) reached Medical Research Council grade 3 or higher at final follow-up. The median Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 59.9 (interquartile range, 38.8 to 70.5) preoperatively and 25.0 (interquartile range, 11.3 to 61.4) at final follow-up. Sixteen patients (33 percent) had isolated axillary nerve injury; the median Medical Research Council grade was 4.25 (interquartile range, 3 to 4.25), with 14 patients (87.6 percent) achieving grade 3 or higher. Thirty-two patients (77 percent) had brachial plexus-associated injury; median Medical Research Council grade was 3 (interquartile range, 2 to 3), with 17 patients (53.1 percent) achieving grade 3 or higher., Conclusion: Medial triceps nerve branch is a strong donor for triceps-to-axillary nerve transfer; however, injury factors may limit the motor recovery in this complex patient population, particularly in axillary nerve palsy associated with brachial plexus injury., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV., Competing Interests: Disclosure:The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures to report., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Restoring shoulder abduction is one of the main priorities in the surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries. Double nerve transfer to the axillary nerve and suprascapular nerve is widely used and considered the best option. The most common donor nerve for the suprascapular nerve is the spinal accessory nerve. However, donor nerves for axillary nerve reconstructions vary and it is still unclear which donor nerve has the best outcome. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review on reconstructions of suprascapular and axillary nerves and to perform a meta-analysis investigating the outcomes of different donor nerves on axillary nerve reconstructions. We conducted a systematic search of English literature from March 2001 to December 2020 following PRISMA guidelines. Two outcomes were assessed, abduction strength using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and range of motion (ROM). Twenty-two studies describing the use of donor nerves met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Donor nerves investigated included the radial nerve, intercostal nerves, medial pectoral nerve, ulnar nerve fascicle, median nerve fascicle and the lower subscapular nerve. Fifteen studies that investigated the radial and intercostal nerves met the inclusion criteria for a meta-analysis. We found no statistically significant difference between either of these nerves in the abduction strength according to MRC score (radial nerve 3.66 ± 1.02 vs intercostal nerves 3.48 ± 0.64, p = 0.086). However, the difference in ROM was statistically significant (radial nerve 106.33 ± 39.01 vs. intercostal nerve 80.42 ± 24.9, p < 0.001). Our findings support using a branch of the radial nerve for the triceps muscle as a donor for axillary nerve reconstruction when possible. Intercostal nerves can be used in cases of total brachial plexus injury or involvement of the C7 root or posterior fascicle. Other promising methods need to be studied more thoroughly in order to validate and compare their results with the more commonly used methods., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Entrapment neuropathies of the shoulder most commonly involve the suprascapular or axillary nerves, and they primarily affect the younger, athletic patient population. The extremes of shoulder mobility required for competitive overhead athletes, particularly in the position of abduction and external rotation, place this cohort at particular risk. Anatomically, the suprascapular nerve is most prone to entrapment at the level of the suprascapular or spinoglenoid notch; the axillary nerve is most prone to entrapment as it traverses the confines of the quadrilateral space.Radiographs should be ordered as a primary imaging study to evaluate for obvious pathology occurring along the course of the nerves or for pathology predisposing the patient to nerve injury. Magnetic resonance imaging plays a role in not only identifying any mass-compressing lesion along the course of the nerve, but also in identifying muscle signal changes typical for denervation and/or fatty atrophy in the distribution of the involved nerve., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Shoulder abduction is crucial for daily activities, and its restoration is one of the surgical priorities. We evaluated the predictive factors of shoulder abduction functional outcome after spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer, with special emphasis on the effect of time from injury to the surgery, in the treatment of traumatic brachial plexus injuries., Method: This cohort included adult patients who underwent SAN-to-SSN transfer with a preoperative Medical Research Council strength grade 0 and a follow-up of minimum 18 months. The primary outcome was shoulder abduction function (bad, < 30°; good, 30°-60°; or excellent, > 60°). Demographics, trauma characteristics, time lapse between injury and surgery, concomitant axillary nerve reconstruction, and surgery duration were registered. Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify predictors of functional outcomes., Results: The records of 83 patients (86.7% men, mean age 28.8 ± 9.8 years) were analysed. Mean body mass index was 24.1 ± 3.7 kg/m 2 , and 43.1% were overweight/obese. Motorcycle crashes were the most common trauma mechanism (88.0%). Excellent, good, and bad outcomes were achieved by 20.4%, 38.6%, and 41.0%, respectively. Older patients tended to have worse outcomes (p = 0.074), as well as left-sided lesions (p = 0.015) or those contralateral to manual dominance (p = 0.057). The longer the interval between injury and surgery the worse the outcome: excellent, 5.5 (4.3-7.1); good, 6.9 (5.9-8.7); and bad, 8.2 (5.7-10.1) months (p = 0.018). After multivariable analysis, longer time interval predicted lower odds of better outcomes (OR 0.823, 95% CI 0.699-0.970, p = 0.020; 17.7% lower odds of good or excellent outcome for each additional month). The odd of good or excellent outcomes was also associated with axillary nerve reconstruction (OR 2.767, 95% CI 1.016-7.536, p = 0.046), but not with age or lesion laterality., Conclusions: Excellent or good functional outcomes for shoulder abduction were achieved by almost sixty percent of adults who underwent SAN-to-SSN transfer for reconstruction of traumatic brachial plexus injuries, associated or not with axillary nerve reconstruction strategies. Longer delays from injury to surgery predicted worse outcomes, and the best time frame seemed to be less than 6 months., (© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: In patients with C5-C6 brachial plexus injury, spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve is usually performed for the restoration of shoulder abduction. In order to minimize donor deficits, we transferred one fascicle of the ipsilateral C7 root, dedicated to the pectoralis major muscle, to the suprascapular nerve., Methods: Ten patients with a mean age of 33 years (range, 19 to 51 years) were operated on at a mean delay of 4 months after their trauma (range, 2 to 7 months). Patients had C5-C6 brachial plexus palsy with avulsed roots on spinal magnetic resonance imaging scan. In addition to the partial C7 transfer, patients sustained nerve transfers to the posterior branch of the axillary nerve and to the motor branches of the musculocutaneous nerve for the biceps and brachialis muscles., Results: At a mean follow-up of 36 months (range, 29 to 42 months), mean shoulder abduction and external rotation ranges of motion were, respectively, 99 degrees (range, 60 to 120 degrees; p = 0.001) and 58 degrees (range, 0 to 80 degrees; p = 0.001). In nine patients, shoulder abduction strength was graded M4, according the British Medical Research Council grading scale, against 1.6 kg (range, 1 to 2 kg), and was graded M3 in one patient. External rotation strength was graded M4 in nine patients and M3 in one patient. Residual strength of the pectoralis major muscle was graded M4+ in every patient., Conclusions: C7 partial transfer to the suprascapular nerve showed satisfactory results at long-term follow-up for active shoulder abduction and external rotation recovery in C5-C6 brachial plexus palsies. This technique replaced spinal accessory nerve transfer in the authors' practice., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

The kinkajou (Potos flavus) is a carnivoran adapted for arboreal quadrupedal locomotion along with a prehensile tail. The thoracic limb bones and muscles of this species have been studied, but the knowledge about its nerves is still scarce. This knowledge is necessary to perform several veterinary procedures, and to review the differences among carnivoran species. Thus, the objective of this study was to describe the origin and distribution of the brachial plexus in Potos flavus. Thereby, both brachial plexuses of five specimens were dissected (10). Seven plexuses originated from C6-T2 (70%), whilst three plexuses originated from C5-T2 (30%). Additionally, C6 and C7 formed two cranial trunks, and C8, T1 and T2 formed two caudal trunks. All nerves from the brachial plexus that have been reported in carnivorans were successfully located. In addition, we found one nerve reaching the teres major muscle originating directly from the brachial plexus and not from the axillary nerve as reported in other carnivorans. The brachiocephalic nerve was found partially innervating the cleidobrachialis muscle (50%), but this muscle always was innervated by the axillary nerve. Moreover, one to three subscapular nerves were found, and the musculocutaneous nerve formed two communicating branches (proximal and distal) to the median nerve. However, the distal communicating branch of the musculocutaneous nerve was absent in two specimens (40%). In conclusion, the brachial plexus of P. flavus was differentiated mainly with other carnivorans by a higher contribution from T2, formations of trunks, and one independent nerve to the teres major muscle., (© 2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Background: The objective of this work was to perform a critical review of the 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional anatomy of the adult brachial plexus divisions and cords. Methods: Twelve adult brachial plexuses from fresh cadavers were dissected. All were male and aged between 30 and 50 years. Only corpses without brachial plexus injuries were selected. The purpose of the dissections was to identify the origin of the anterior and posterior divisions of the adult brachial plexus in their respective trunks, as well as the positioning of the posterior, lateral, and medial cords. Results: The posterior division of all trunks had a cranial and dorsal origin, while the anterior division of all trunks had a caudal and ventral origin. The posterior cord was the most cranial of all, the lateral cord was central, and the medial cord was the most caudal of all cords. The posterior division of the superior trunk was always between the suprascapular nerve and the anterior division. Conclusions: Brachial plexus diagrams in most textbooks and papers are different from what was found in our dissections. Contrary to the known diagram, the posterior divisions always had a cranial origin in the superior, middle, and inferior trunks.

Background: This cadaveric study investigated the innervations of the clavicle and clavicular joints (ie, sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joints)., Methods: Twenty cadavers (40 clavicles) were dissected. A skin incision was made to permit exposure of the posterior cervical triangle and infraclavicular fossa. The platysma, sternocleidomastoid, and trapezius muscles were cleaned in order to identify the supraclavicular nerves. Subsequently, the suprascapular and subclavian nerves were localized after removal of the prevertebral layer of the deep cervical fascia. In the infraclavicular region, the pectoralis major and minor muscles were retracted laterally in order to visualize the lateral pectoral nerve. The contribution of all these nerves to the clavicular bone and joints were recorded., Results: Along their entire length, all clavicular specimens received contributions from the supraclavicular nerves. The latter innervated the cephalad and ventral aspects of the clavicular bone. The caudal and dorsal aspects of the clavicle were innervated by the subclavian nerve (middle and medial thirds). The lateral pectoral nerve supplied the caudad aspect of the clavicle (middle and lateral thirds). The sternoclavicular joint derived its innervation solely from the supraclavicular nerves whereas the acromioclavicular joint was supplied by the supraclavicular and lateral pectoral nerves., Conclusion: The clavicle and clavicular joints are innervated by the subclavian, lateral pectoral, and supraclavicular nerves. Clinical trials are required to determine the relative importance and functional contribution of each nerve., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: The objective of our study is to determine the anatomical viability in cadavers of a novel doble nerve transfer technique for simultaneous reanimation of shoulder abduction and sensory recovery of the hand, in patients with brachial plexus injuries sustaining a C5-C6-C7 roots avulsion. These new transfers should be complemented in the clinical setting with other classic nerve transfers, i.e.: (1) a spinal accessory to suprascapular for shoulder abduction and stability, (2) ulnar nerve fascicles to the biceps branches of the musculocutaneous for elbow flexion, and (3) intercostal to triceps branches for elbow extension., Methods: The proposed surgical technique includes (1) transferring motor fascicles of the median nerve (MNF), as donors to the axillary nerve (AN), and (2) the whole medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (MACN) to the lateral contribution (sensory) of the median nerve (LCMN), both without the use of interposed nerve grafts. These techniques were performed in eight cadaveric upper extremities. Analyzed variables were: donor and receptor nerves diameter, length and distance of donor and receptors nerves, and axonal count., Results: The mean distance between the MNF and its point of coaptation to the AN was 19 mm. The average length of each one of the MNF, after distal dissection, was 46.5 mm. The average diameter of each fascicle of the median nerve at its coaptation point with the axillary nerve was 0.8 mm, while the average diameter of the latter was 3.9 mm. The average distance between the MACN and its point of coaptation to the LCMN, was 16.5 mm. The average diameter of the MACN and the LCMN at their point of coaptation, were 2.7 mm and 3.5 mm, respectively., Conclusion: These nerve transfers are anatomically viable and could be a complement for other currently used techniques that can be employed in severely injured C567 brachial plexus patients., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: This study proposes an ideal botulinum toxin injection point of the trapezius muscle for shoulder line contouring, pain management, and functional impairment. This study describes the intramuscular nerve branching in the trapezius muscle, providing essential information for botulinum neurotoxin injection., Method: A modified Sihler's method was performed on the trapezius muscles (16 specimens). The intramuscular arborization areas were elucidated regarding the external occipital protuberance superiorly, spinous process of the 12th thoracic vertebra inferiorly and acromion of the scapula., Result: The intramuscular neural distribution for the superior, middle, and inferior regions of the trapezius muscle had the greatest arborized patterns in the horizontal 1/5-2/5 and vertical 2/10-4/10 sections, the horizontal 1/5-3/5 and vertical 4/10-5/10 sections, and the horizontal 1/5-2/5 and vertical 5/10-7/10 sections, respectively., Discussion: We propose that BoNT treatments should be directed to the horizontal 1/5-2/5 and vertical 2/10-4/10 sections of the superior trapezius, the horizontal 1/5-3/5 and vertical 4/10-5/10 sections of the middle trapezius and the horizontal 1/5-2/5 and vertical 5/10-7/10 sections of the inferior trapezius. Additionally, injective treatment at the horizontal 2/5-3/5 and vertical 2/10-4/10 nerve entry points should be avoided to prevent nerve trunk damage causing paralysis. According to our guidelines, clinicians can ensure minimal dose injections and fewer adverse effects in botulinum neurotoxin injective treatment., (© 2020 American Association of Clinical Anatomists.)

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the axillary nerve's location along superficial anatomical landmarks, and to define a convenient risk zone., Methods: A total of 123 upper extremities were evaluated. After dissection of the axillary nerve, the vertical distance between the upper border of the anterolateral edge of the acromion and the proximal border of the nerve was measured. Furthermore, the interval between the proximal border and the distal border of the axillary nerve's branches was evaluated. The interval between the distal border of the branches and the most distal part of the lateral humeral epicondyle was measured. The distance between the anterolateral edge of the acromion and the lateral humeral epicondyle was evaluated. Measurements were expressed as proportions with respect to the distance between the acromion and the lateral humeral epicondyle., Results: The distance between the acromion and the proximal border of the axillary nerve's branches was at a height of 10 percent of the distance between the acromion and the lateral humeral epicondyle, starting from the acromion (90 percent when starting from the lateral humeral epicondyle). The interval between the proximal and distal margins of the axillary nerve's branches was between 10 percent and 30 to 35 percent of this interval, starting from the acromion (65 to 70 percent when starting from the lateral humeral epicondyle)., Conclusions: The authors were able to locate the branches of the axillary nerve at an interval between 10 and 35 percent of the distance between the acromion and the lateral humeral epicondyle, starting from the acromion. This makes the proximal third of this distance an easily applicable risk zone during shoulder surgery., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Upper brachial plexus injury or isolated lesions of the axillary nerve (AN) compromise shoulder functionality significantly. Different surgical techniques have been described for selective reconstruction of the AN, with good results especially in association with repair of the suprascapular nerve. The objective of this study is to describe the transfer of motor fascicles of the median nerve to the AN by an axillary approach in cadavers and the clinical results in 2 patients. Dissections were performed on 5 cadavers, followed by identification and dissection of the AN and its divisions before entering the quadrangular space. We standardized the surgical technique in which the median nerve was first identified and then an intrafascicular dissection was performed. Then we harvested a fascicle and transferred it to the anterolateral branch of the AN. Two patients underwent an operation; at 2 years of follow-up, average abduction of 125 degrees and external rotation of 95 degrees were observed. In conclusion, the transfer of motor fascicles of the median nerve to the AN by an axillary approach could be an alternative technique for the deltoid reinnervation in upper brachial plexus injury. Some advantages are the proximity of the donor nerve to the receptor nerve and the low morbidity of the target muscles of the donor nerve. Studies with a larger number of patients are required to establish its effectiveness compared with other techniques already described., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors report no conflicts of interest and no source of funding., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Quadrilateral space syndrome (QSS) is a peripheral nerve entrapment disease, which can be misdiagnosed in clinic. In the past, QSS was mainly diagnosed by clinical symptoms combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electromyography (EMG), and arterial angiography. There are few reports on the diagnosis of QSS by musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) combined with clinical symptoms., Patient Concerns: A middle-aged female patient had posterolateral pain and numbness in her right shoulder for 2 months., Diagnoses: At first, she was diagnosed as suprascapular nerve entrapment, while EMG of suprascapular nerve and axillary nerve indicated that nerve conduction was normal. Then, MRI was performed, showing the shoulder had no abnormalities, and EMG and arterial angiography of upper limb showed no abnormalities too. Finally, she was diagnosed as QSS according to MSKUS and lidocaine block test., Interventions: Two sealing treatments of axillary nerve block in quadrilateral space under the guidance of MSKUS were performed., Outcomes: After 2 treatments, the pain and numbness in her shoulder disappeared, and her shoulder could move normally. There was no recurrence after 3 months of follow-up., Conclusion: MSKUS is an effective method to diagnose QSS. It is fast, convenient and inexpensive, and is worth popularizing in clinic., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Advanced imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography, MRI) is a key component in defining and localizing the underlying cause of forelimb lameness. Given the propensity of soft tissue injury/disease of the shoulder and brachial plexus, ultrasound and MRI are of particular utility in defining tendinous, muscular, and nerve lesions. An advanced knowledge of shoulder and brachial plexus anatomy is necessary for both image acquisition and interpretation. To determine clinical significance, interpretation of both normal anatomy and suspected pathology must be correlated with clinical signs and orthopedic examination findings., Competing Interests: Disclosure Nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The capuchin is a neotropical primate that presents easy reproduction in captivity and is used in scientific research. The objective of this work was to describe the structure and the branching pattern of the brachial plexus of the capuchin and to compare the results with data from the literature for humans, chimpanzees, baboons and Callithrix., Methods: Twelve specimens were used: eight males and four females. No animals were killed for the purpose of this study., Results: The brachial plexus of Sapajus sp was constituted mainly from the ventral roots of the last four cervical spinal nerves, from C5 to C8, mainly, and the first thoracic nerve (T1)., Conclusions: The pattern of formation of the brachial plexus of the capuchin monkey was more similar to that of Callithrix and baboons, perhaps because they are the only primates in this study to be essentially quadrupedal., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: The decision-making in neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) treatment continues to have many areas in need of clarification. Graft repair was the gold standard until the introduction of nerve transfer strategies. Currently, there is conflicting evidence regarding outcomes in patients with nerve grafts versus nerve transfers in relation to shoulder function. The objective of this study was to further define the outcomes for reconstruction strategies in NBPP with a specific focus on the shoulder., Methods: A cohort of patients with NBPP and surgical repairs from a single center were reviewed. Demographic and standard clinical data, including imaging and electrodiagnostics, were gathered from a clinical database. Clinical data from physical therapy evaluations, including active and passive range of motion, were examined. Statistical analysis was performed on the available data., Results: Forty-five patients met the inclusion criteria for this study, 19 with graft repair and 26 with nerve transfers. There were no significant differences in demographics between the two groups. Understandably, there were no patients in the nerve grafting group with preganglionic lesions, resulting in a difference in lesion type between the cohorts. There were no differences in preoperative shoulder function between the cohorts. Both groups reached statistically significant improvements in shoulder flexion and shoulder abduction. The nerve transfer group experienced a significant improvement in shoulder external rotation, from -78° to -28° (p = 0.0001), whereas a significant difference was not reached in the graft group. When compared between groups, there appeared to be a trend favoring nerve transfer in shoulder external rotation, with the graft patients improving by 17° and the transfer patients improving by 49° (p = 0.07)., Conclusions: In NBPP, patients with shoulder weakness experience statistically significant improvements in shoulder flexion and abduction after graft repair or nerve transfer, and patients with nerve transfers additionally experience significant improvement in external rotation. With regard to shoulder external rotation, there appear to be some data supporting the use of nerve transfers.

Background: Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a rare disease of young children. The typical presentation involves acute-onset flaccid paralysis in one or more extremities with a nonspecific viral prodrome. Long-term outcomes demonstrate that functional recovery plateaus around six to nine months. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of nerve transfers for restoring shoulder function in these patients., Methods: A retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with AFM at a single institution. Shoulder function was evaluated using the active movement scale (AMS). Children at a minimum of six months after diagnosis with plateaued shoulder AMS scores of 4 or less were indicated for surgery., Results: Eleven patients were identified with a mean time from symptom onset to surgery of 12 months. Average follow-up was 19 months. The mean AMS score at follow-up for shoulder external rotation and abduction was 4.6 and 2.8, respectively. A total of six different nerve transfers with five different donor nerves were used individually or in conjunction with each other. The most common transfers were from the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve (n = 8) and from the intercostal nerves ×3 to the axillary nerve (n = 5). Patients who received a transfer from the radial nerve to the axillary nerve (n = 2) had the best functional returns, with the mean AMS score of 6.5 in both external rotation and abduction at follow-up., Conclusion: Nerve transfer procedures may help restore shoulder function in the setting of AFM. Combination procedures that involve a transfer from the radial nerve to the axillary nerve may provide the best functional results., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The shoulder is the joint most prone to dislocating in the human body and accounts for 45% of all dislocations. In addition to ruptures of the soft tissue and bony injuries, lesions to vascular structures as well as the brachial plexus and its corresponding nerves might occur. With an incidence of up to 65%, nerve lesions are frequently reported after shoulder dislocations. The aim of this study is to obtain information on epidemiology, diagnostics, treatment and duration until remission or late sequelae after shoulder dislocation and concomitant nerve injury in a large patient cohort., Methods: The patient cohort consisted of 15,739 patients from three centres who had sustained a shoulder dislocation. All patient files were searched for concomitant injury of the brachial plexus or its corresponding nerves. For epidemiological data analysis, demographic data, clinical follow-ups, electromyography and nerve conduction velocity were evaluated., Results: In total, 60 patients (32 males, 28 females) with a mean age of 60 years (range 19-88 years) met the inclusion criteria. In the majority of patients (n = 51), the trauma mechanism was a trivial fall on the outstretched arm. The most frequent dislocation direction was anterior-caudal in 61.6%, followed by strictly caudal in 16.6%. The brachial plexus was injured in 46 patients (76.6%) and isolated nerve damage was documented in 14 patients (23.3%). Electroneurographic examinations were performed in less than half of the patients (38.3%)., Conclusion: A combination injury of shoulder dislocation and plexus lesion may occur at any age and sometimes has a poor outcome. Electroneurographic examinations should be implemented when managing these patients as a cost-effective and supportive examination., Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective study.

Introduction: Symptoms of the shoulder syndrome (SS) and spinal accessory nerve (SAN) impairments are well-known complications to any neck dissections (NDs). Even so, their prevalence is reported with large variations in the literature. Furthermore, marginal mandibular nerve (MMN) injuries are claimed to be underreported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of SS, SAN and MMN injuries after different types of ND., Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies reporting SAN and MMN injuries following the three main types of ND. Pooled estimates of the prevalence were made by the main types of ND with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)., Results: Nineteen studies reported a total of 457 SAN injuries. The estimated prevalence of SS or SAN injuries following radical neck dissection, modified radical neck dissection and selective neck dissection was 94.8% (95% CI: 88.5-98.9%), 33.0% (95% CI: 19.4-48.3%) and 27.9% (95% CI: 7.1-54.5%), respectively. Five studies reported a total of 64 MMN injuries. The estimated prevalence following modified radical neck dissection and selective neck dissection was 13.1% (95% CI: 0-37.6%) and 12.7% (95% CI: 4.3-24.1%), respectively., Conclusions: This meta-analysis estimated a high prevalence of SS, SAN and MMN injuries following the three main types of ND. If oncological considerations allow it, the less morbid ND should be considered. MMN injuries have only been reported in a limited number of small studies. The results may be used to compare future research and as guidance for quality evaluation within departments., (Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.)

Preserving the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) is an important step in the modern-day neck dissection to avoid postoperative functional morbidity in patients. This goal can become technically difficult, especially, when rare anatomical variations are encountered. We present a case of dual SAN in a patient undergoing selective neck dissection for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Both SANs were preserved and patient had no shoulder dysfunction postoperatively. We take this opportunity to emphasise that meticulous dissection is the only proven way to preserve the nerve. And that surgeons should be aware of this anatomical variation. SAN should be subjected to minimal traction during neck dissection to avoid tension neuropraxia and long-term shoulder dysfunction., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of shoulder pain and can result in prolonged periods of pain, disability and absence from work. Rotator cuff repair surgery is increasingly used in an attempt to resolve symptoms but has failure rates of around 40%. There is a pressing need to improve the outcome of rotator cuff repairs. Patch augmentation increasingly being used within the NHS in an attempt to reduce repair failures. The aim of this survey was to determine current UK practice and opinion relating to the factors that influence choice of patch, current patient selection and willingness to assist with generation of improved evidence., Methods: An online survey was sent to the surgeon members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS). Questions covered respondent demographics, experience with patches, indications for patch augmentation and willingness to be involved in a randomised trial of patch augmented rotator cuff surgery., Results: The response rate was 105/550 (19%). 58% of respondents had used a patch to augment rotator cuff surgery. 70% of patch users had undertaken an augmented repair within the last 6 months. A wide surgical experience in augmentation was reported (ranging 1 to 200 implants used). However, most surgeons reported low volume usage, with a median of 5 rotator cuff augmentation procedures performed. At least 10 different products had been used. Most of the patches used were constructed from human decellularised dermis tissue, although porcine derived and synthetic based patches had also been used. Only 3-5% stated they would undertake an augmented repair for small tears across ages, whereas 28-40% and 19-59% would do so for large or massive tears respectively. When assessing patient suitability, patient age seemed relevant only for those with large and massive tears. Half of the surgeons reported an interest in taking part in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the role of patch augmentation for rotator cuff surgery, with a further 22% of respondent's undecided., Conclusions: A variety of patches have been used by surgeons to augment rotator cuff repair with a wide range of operator experience. There was substantial uncertainty about which patch to use and differing views on which patients were most suitable. There is a clear need for robust clinical evaluation and further research in this area., Competing Interests: Author AC has been developing a patch for potential use to rotator cuff surgery. None of the other authors have any COIs to declare.

Background: Selective neck dissection (SND) is a mainstay of head and neck cancer treatment. A common sequela is shoulder syndrome from spinal accessory nerve (SAN) trauma. Extensive dissection in neck levels 2 and 5 leads to SAN dysfunction. However, it is not known whether limited level 2 dissection reduces SAN injury. The purpose of this double-blind randomized controlled trial was to determine whether omitting level 2b dissection would improve shoulder-related quality of life and function., Methods: Patients with head and neck cancers undergoing surgery were randomized 1:1 to SND without level 2b dissection (group 1) or with it (group 2) on their dominant-hand side. Patients, caregivers, and assessors were blinded. The primary outcome was the change in the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) score after 6 months. An a priori calculation of the minimally important clinical difference in the NDII score was determined to establish a sample size of 15 patients per group (power = 0.8). Secondary outcomes included shoulder strength and range of motion (ROM) and SAN nerve conduction. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00765791)., Results: Forty patients were enrolled, and 30 were included (15 per group). Six months after the surgery, group 2 demonstrated a significant median decrease in the NDII from the baseline (30 points) and in comparison with group 1, whose NDII dropped 17.5 points (P = .02). Shoulder ROM and SAN conduction demonstrated significant declines in group 2 (P ≤ .05). No adverse events occurred., Conclusions: Level 2b should be omitted in SND when this is oncologically safe and feasible. This allows for an optimal balance between function and cancer cure., (© 2019 American Cancer Society.)

The shoulder block may impair ventilatory function and diaphragmatic movement less than the interscalene brachial plexus block. We randomly allocated 30 adults who underwent shoulder arthroscopy under general anaesthesia to ultrasound-guided shoulder block or interscalene block with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5%. The primary outcome, rate of ultrasound-measured hemidiaphragmatic excursion < 25% of baseline 30 min after blockade, was reduced from 12/15 with brachial plexus block to 2/15 with shoulder block, a difference (95%CI) of 67% (40-93%), p < 0.001. The mean (SD) numeric rating scale pain scores at rest after shoulder block were higher than after interscalene block at two postoperative hours, 1.4 (1.2) vs. 0.3 (0.7), p = 0.02, but lower at 24 postoperative hours, 1.3 (1.3) vs. 3.4 (2.3), p = 0.008. Mean (SD) pain scores on movement in the shoulder and interscalene blocks were similar, with respective values of 1.9 (1.9) vs. 0.7 (1.2), p = 0.13 at two postoperative hours and 3.7 (2.3) vs. 5.3 (2.5), p = 0.41, at 24 postoperative hours., (© 2019 Association of Anaesthetists.)

Interscalene brachial plexus block provides analgesia for shoulder surgery but is associated with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. Before considering a combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block as an alternative to interscalene brachial plexus block, evaluation of the incidence of diaphragmatic dysfunction according to the approach to the suprascapular nerve is necessary. We randomly allocated 84 patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery to an anterior or a posterior approach to the suprascapular nerve block combined with an axillary nerve block using 10 ml ropivacaine 0.375% for each nerve. The primary outcome was the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis diagnosed by ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included: characterisation of the hemidiaphragmatic paralysis over time; numeric rating scale pain scores; oral morphine equivalent consumption; and patient satisfaction. The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis was 40% (n = 17) vs. 2% (n = 1) in the anterior and posterior groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In one third of patients with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, it persisted beyond the eighth hour. The median (interquartile range [range]) oral morphine equivalent consumption was significantly higher in the posterior approach when compared with the anterior approach, whether in the recovery area (20 [5-31 (0-60)] mg vs. 7.5 [0-14 (0-52)] mg, respectively; p = 0.004) or during the first 24 h (82 [61-127 (12-360) mg] vs. 58 [30-86 (0-160)] mg, respectively; p = 0.01). Patient satisfaction was comparable between groups (p = 0.6). Compared with the anterior approach, diaphragmatic function is best preserved with the posterior needle approach to the suprascapular nerve block., (© 2020 Association of Anaesthetists.)

Background: The innervation of the shoulder-upper-extremity area is complicated and unclear. Regional anesthesia with a brachial plexus and cervical plexus block is probably inadequate for the proximal humeral surgery. Missing blockade of the T1-T2 nerves may be the reason. We conduct this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) to explore whether an additional T2 thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) can improve the success rate of regional anesthesia for elderly patients in proximal humeral fracture surgery., Methods/design: The patients aged 65 years or older, referred for anterior-approach proximal humeral fracture surgery, will be enrolled. Each patient will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a combined interscalene brachial plexus with superficial cervical plexus block (IC) (combined interscalene brachial plexus with superficial cervical plexus block) or an IC block combined with thoracic paravertebral block (ICTP) block (combined thoracic paravertebral block with brachial plexus and superficial cervical plexus block). The primary outcome is the success rate of regional anesthesia without rescue analgesic methods. The secondary outcomes are as follows: sensory block at the surgical area, proportion of patients who need rescue anesthesia (intravenously administered remifentanil or conversion to general anesthesia), cumulative doses of intraoperative vasoactive medications and adverse events. The total sample size is estimated to be 80 patients., Discussion: This RCT aims to confirm whether an additional T2 TPVB can provide better anesthetic effects of regional anesthesia with brachial and cervical plexus block in elderly patients undergoing proximal humeral surgery., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03919422. Registered on 19 April 2019.

Background: The sensory innervation of the shoulder is complex and there are variations in the branching patterns of the sensory fibres. Articular branches from the axillary nerve to the subacromial bursa are described in more than 50% of investigated shoulders but the isolated contribution of sensory input from the axillary nerve has never been investigated clinically. We hypothesized that a selective block of the axillary nerve would reduce morphine consumption and pain after arthroscopic subacromial decompression., Methods: We included 60 patients in a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to a preoperative selective ultrasound-guided axillary nerve block with 20 mL ropivacaine (7.5 mg/mL) or 20 mL saline. Primary outcome was intravenous morphine consumption 0-4 h postoperatively. Secondary outcome was postoperative pain evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS) score (0-100)., Results: We analysed data from 50 patients and found no significant difference in 0-4 h postoperative morphine consumption between the two groups (ropivacaine 14 mg, placebo 18 mg (P = 0.12)). There was a reduction in postoperative pain: VAS 0-4 h (area under the curve) (ropivacaine 135, placebo 182 (P = 0.03)), VAS after 8 h (ropivacaine 9, placebo 20 (P = 0.01)) and VAS after 24 h (ropivacaine 7, placebo 18 (P = 0.04)). Eight out of 19 patients with a successful selective axillary nerve block needed an interscalene brachial plexus escape block., Conclusions: Selective block of the axillary nerve has some pain relieving effect, but in this setting the effect was unpredictable, variable and far from sufficient in a large proportion of the patients., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01463865). Registered: November 1, 2011.