Search

Adjuvant oral uracil-tegafur (UFT) has led to significantly longer postoperative survival among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy is also reportedly effective for NSCLC and has minor adverse events (AEs). This study compared the efficacy of GEM- versus UFT-based adjuvant regimens in patients with completely resected pathological stage (p-stage) IB–IIIA NSCLC. Patients with completely resected p-stage IB–IIIA NSCLC were randomly assigned to GEM or UFT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), and AEs. We assigned 305 patients to the GEM group and 303 to the UFT group. Baseline factors were balanced between the arms. Of the 608 patients, 293 (48.1%) had p-stage IB disease, 195 (32.0%) had p-stage II disease and 121 (19.9%) had p-stage IIIA disease. AEs were generally mild in both groups, and only one death occurred, in the GEM group. After a median follow-up of 6.8 years, the two groups did not significantly differ in survival: 5 year OS rates were GEM: 70.0%, UFT: 68.8% (hazard ratio 0.948; 95% confidence interval 0.73–1.23; P = 0.69). Although GEM-based adjuvant therapy for patients with completely resected stage IB–IIIA NSCLC was associated with acceptable toxicity, it did not provide longer OS than did UFT.

We experienced a 70-year-old female with brain and liver tumors. She underwent surgical operations for rectal cancer 8 year ago and lung cancer 16 years ago. Surgical removal of a brain tumor and a liver biopsy were performed. The brain tumor consisted of an adenocarcinoma with a solid signet-ring cell pattern. Under the possibility of metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged lung cancer in the brain and liver, immunohistochemistries (IHCs) for ALK were performed, returning positive results. Thus, metastasis of ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma in the brain and liver had been confirmed. The patient was administered alectinib, which was well tolerated and has been in partial response for about one year and a half. By the genetic analyses for EML4-ALK variants, both the previous lung cancer and metastatic brain tumor were shown to harbor the same EML4-ALK variant 3 fusion. We thus concluded that ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma has recurred as liver and brain metastases 16 years after curative surgery.

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC were eligible. In the phase I dose-escalation cohort (3 + 3 design), patients received nab-paclitaxel (80 or 100 mg/m2 given intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15) plus cisplatin (60 or 75 mg/m2 given intravenously on day 1) every 4 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 given intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m2 given intravenously on day 1) every 4 weeks was selected for the phase II cohort. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Results Twenty-three patients (phase I, n = 6; phase II, n = 17) were enrolled, and 22 patients were eligible. The median age was 67.5 years (range 37–75), 90.9% were males, 45.5% had adenocarcinoma and 81.8% had stage IV disease. The ORR was 59.1% (90% confidence interval (CI); 41.8–74.4), and the disease control rate was 86.4% (95% CI; 66.7–95.3). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months (95% CI; 4.0–6.7), and the median overall survival was 24.2 months (95% CI; 8.4 months to not estimable). The common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (31.8%), leukopenia (27.3%), lung infection (18.2%) and hyponatremia (18.2%). There was one instance of grade 2 interstitial pneumonia and no treatment-related death. Conclusions Nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin was well tolerated and associated with encouraging response outcomes in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC. Further investigation is warranted. Trial registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000011776; Date of registration: 17 September 2013; Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 23 January 2014.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as promising therapeutic agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the duration for which ICIs should be continued remains a clinical problem. Methods We examined the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors after the discontinuation of antibodies due to adverse events (AEs) in patients with NSCLC. This was a multicenter retrospective study that analyzed NSCLC patients who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors by August 2016. Results The patients with NSCLC were 18 males and 1 female at a median 67 years of age (range: 49–80 years). Eighteen of 19 patients were treated with nivolumab, one was with atezolizumab. Approximately half of AEs were interstitial pneumonia. Fourteen patients (73.7%) were treated with steroid therapy. The median number of treatment cycles was 7 (range, 1–70), and the median duration of treatment was 2.8 months (range, 1 day-32.9 months). The overall response rate with confirmation during treatment was 21.1%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.2–17.1 months) and 5.6 months (95% CI = 0–12.2 months) from the initiation and the discontinuation of PD-1/PD-L1 treatment, respectively. The median PFS after discontinuation according to the confirmed response during administration was not reached for partial response (PR) and 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.7–6.0) for stable disease (SD) patients (P = 0.02). Conclusion The PFS of the PR patients was completely different from that of the SD patients. The cases with PR prior to the onset of AE tended to show a durable response after the discontinuation of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4819-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objectives Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (i.e., EGFR-TKIs) improve the survival of lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutations. Despite the initial efficacy of EGFR-TKIs, the disease progression caused by acquired resistance to these inhibitors is inevitable. T790M mutations represent a major resistance mechanism to EGFR-TKIs but can be overcome using osimertinib. The IMPRESS trial revealed that the continuation of EGFR-TKI beyond progressive disease (PD) concurrent with platinum-doublet chemotherapy was not beneficial. However, various clinical trials have suggested that EGFR-TKI beyond PD plus single-agent chemotherapy may be a possible treatment strategy. Materials and Methods This study was a single-arm phase II trial. Patients with EGFR-activating mutations (del19 and L858R) that progressed using first-line gefitinib treatment were enrolled and treated with gefitinib beyond PD plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 q3w. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Mutation-biased polymerase chain reaction quenching probe, which is the original method for detecting T790M mutations in cell-free plasma DNA, was used prior to treatment. Results Thirty-six patients were enrolled between May 1, 2013, and March 31, 2016. One patient was excluded before starting the treatment. Among the 35 patients, 15 patients had del19 mutations, and 20 patients had L858R mutations; 33 patients were evaluable for response by using radiographic findings. The median PFS was 6.7 months (95% confidence interval: 4.4–7.7 months). Nineteen patients were T790M positive. No significant difference in PFS was found in a subgroup analysis of EGFR mutation status and T790M positivity. All toxicities were tolerable. Conclusion Gefitinib plus pemetrexed treatment following relapse using gefitinib in patients with Non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations demonstrated preferable PFS with mild toxicity. This combination therapy may be considered for platinum-unfit patients without T790M with disease progression using first-line gefitinib. (This clinical trial was registered in UMIN-CTGR as UMIN000010709).

BACKGROUND Preclinical studies suggested that the addition of bevacizumab could overcome acquired resistance (AR) to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a combination of afatinib and bevacizumab after AR. METHODS Patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer after AR were enrolled during any line of therapy. Afatinib was prescribed at 30 mg, and 15 mg/kg bevacizumab was administered every 3 weeks until progression. RESULTS Between October 2014 and May 2017, 32 eligible patients were evaluated. The mutation subtypes were Del-19 (20 [63%]), L858R (11 [34%]), and L861Q (1 [3%]). T790M was detected in 14 patients (44%). The median number of prior regimens was 4 (range, 1-10). Six patients obtained a partial response, and 23 had stable disease; this resulted in an objective response rate (ORR) of 18.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2%-36.4%) and a disease control rate of 90.7% (95% CI, 75.0%-98.0%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.3 months (95% CI, 3.9-8.7 months). The ORRs and median PFS times of T790M+ and T790M- patients were 14.3% and 22.2%, respectively, and 6.3 and 7.1 months, respectively; those of Del-19 and L858R patients were 20.0% and 11.1%, respectively, and 6.3 and 5.1 months, respectively. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (incidence ≥ 10%) included paronychia (25%), hypertension (41%), and proteinuria (19%). There were no treatment-related deaths, interstitial lung disease, or bevacizumab-associated severe bleeding. CONCLUSIONS Afatinib plus bevacizumab demonstrated clinical efficacy and safety after AR to EGFR TKIs and could be a therapeutic salvage option for T790M- populations.

We herein report a case of immune-related colitis induced by the long-term use of nivolumab. A 62-year-old Japanese man was treated with nivolumab at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks for advanced lung adenocarcinoma. The patient was admitted to our hospital due to non-bloody watery diarrhea after the 70th dose of nivolumab. A biopsy specimen of the colon mucosa revealed evidence of colitis with cryptitis and crypt microabscesses. He was diagnosed with immune-related colitis and started on predonisolone 60 mg/day. Subsequently, his symptoms remarkably resolved. Consideration of immune-related adverse events up to several years after the initiation of nivolumab is important.

Background Malignant pleural effusion is a commonly seen complication of malignancies such as lung and breast cancers. In Western countries, talc is frequently used as a standard therapeutic agent (pleurodesis agent) with the aim of alleviating symptoms including dyspnea and chest pain. Talc is not recognized as a pleurodesis agent in Japan. The aim of this study was to verify the efficacy and safety of sterilized talc (NPC-05) for the introduction of talc in Japan. Methods The study was a single-arm, open-label, investigator-initiated trial conducted jointly at six institutions. The subjects were 30 patients with malignant pleural effusions. A solution of 4 g NPC-05 suspended in 50 ml physiological saline was instilled into the pleural space to perform pleurodesis. Results The efficacy of NPC-05 for pleural adhesion 30 days after pleurodesis was 83.3% (25/30 cases). Amelioration of dyspnea and pain (chest pain) was seen. Commonly seen adverse effects were increased C-reactive protein (CRP) and fever. Nearly all adverse events were phenomena previously reported as adverse effects of talc. No acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or other serious side effects occurred. Conclusion The efficacy and safety of NPC-05 for malignant pleural effusion in Japanese patients was verified, and the clinical outcomes with talc were confirmed to be the same as previously reported in other countries. There is thought to be a high level of need for this agent in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion in Japan.

Purpose The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase has been an important target for non–small-cell lung cancer. Several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved, and both gefitinib and erlotinib are the most well-known first-generation EGFR-TKIs. This randomized phase III study was conducted to investigate the difference between these two EGFR-TKIs. Patients and Methods Previously treated patients with lung adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib or erlotinib. This study aimed to investigate the noninferiority of gefitinib compared with erlotinib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Five hundred sixty-one patients were randomly assigned, including 401 patients (71.7%) with EGFR mutation. All baseline factors (except performance status) were balanced between the arms. Median PFS and overall survival times for gefitinib and erlotinib were 6.5 and 7.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.125; 95% CI, 0.940 to 1.347; P = .257) and 22.8 and 24.5 months (HR, 1.038; 95% CI, 0.833 to 1.294; P = .768), respectively. The response rates for gefitinib and erlotinib were 45.9% and 44.1%, respectively. Median PFS times in EGFR mutation–positive patients receiving gefitinib versus erlotinib were 8.3 and 10.0 months, respectively (HR, 1.093; 95% CI, 0.879 to 1.358; P = .424). The primary grade 3 or 4 toxicities were rash (2.2% for gefitinib v 18.1% for erlotinib) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (6.1%/13.0% for gefitinib v 2.2%/3.3% for erlotinib). Conclusion The study did not demonstrate noninferiority of gefitinib compared with erlotinib in terms of PFS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma according to the predefined criteria.

Use of plasma DNA to detect mutations has spread widely as a form of liquid biopsy. EGFR T790M has been observed in half of lung cancer patients who have acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKI). Effectiveness of monitoring T790M via plasma DNA during treatment with EGFR‐TKI has not been established as an alternative to re‐biopsy. This was a prospective multicenter observational study involving non‐small cell lung cancer patients carrying EGFR L858R or exon 19 deletions, treated with EGFR‐TKI. The primary objective was to determine whether T790M could be detected using plasma DNA in patients with progressive disease (PD). T790M was examined using the mutation‐biased PCR and quenching probe (MBP‐QP) method, a sensitive, fully‐automated system developed in our laboratory. Eighty‐nine non‐small cell lung cancer patients were enrolled from seven hospitals in Japan. Sequential examinations revealed T790M in plasma DNA among 40% of patients who developed PD. Activating mutations, such as L858R and exon 19 deletions, were detected in 40% of patients using plasma DNA, and either T790M or activating mutations were observed in 62%. Dividing into four periods (before PD, at PD, at discontinuation of EGFR‐TKI and subsequently), T790M was detected in 10, 19, 24 and 27% of patients, respectively. Smokers, males, patients having exon 19 deletions and patients who developed new lesions evidenced significantly frequent presence of T790M in plasma DNA. Monitoring T790M with plasma DNA using MBP‐QP reflects the clinical course of lung cancer patients treated with EGFR‐TKI. Detection of T790M with plasma DNA was correlated with EGFR mutation type, exon 19 deletions and tumor progression. Re‐biopsy could be performed only in 14% of PD cases, suggesting difficulty in obtaining re‐biopsy specimens in practice. Monitoring T790M with plasma DNA reflects the clinical course, and is potentially useful in designing strategies for subsequent treatment.

The aim of our study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed monotherapy in chemo-naive Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type or unknown advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pemetrexed was administered at 500 mg/m2 triweekly until progression with supplementations in chemo-naive ECOG PS 2 patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Between September 2009 and April 2013, twenty-eight patients were enrolled. Median age was 75 (range 59–89). Nineteen (68 %) of 28 were ever smoker, and 18 (64 %) had pulmonary emphysema. Sixteen (57 %) had comorbidities such as hypertension, heart disease, and/or diabetes. In 26 eligible patients, the overall response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median overall survival were 11.5, 53.8 %, 3.0 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.9–5.7] months and 9.5 (95 % CI 3.3–12.5) months, respectively. Median administered course number was 3 (range 1–14). Median duration of PS maintenance ≤2 was 4.9 (95 % CI 1.3–9.7) months. Common (≥10 %) grade 3/4 toxicities included 7 (27 %) neutropenia, 7 (27 %) leukopenia, 4 (15 %) fatigue, and 3 (12 %) thrombocytopenia. Febrile neutropenia and interstitial lung disease were not observed. There were no treatment-related deaths. Pemetrexed monotherapy demonstrated moderate efficacy and good safety in chemo-naive PS 2 patients with EGFR wild-type or unknown non-squamous NSCLC. It can be a therapeutic option in “frail” PS 2 non-squamous NSCLC patients without the indication of combination regimens, if the patient is EGFR wild-type.

Background The optimal chemotherapy regimen for non-small cell lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease is unclear. We therefore investigated the safety and efficacy of carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel as a first-line regimen for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with interstitial lung disease. Methods We retrospectively reviewed advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease who received carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel as a first-line chemotherapy regimen at Hyogo Cancer Center between February 2013 and August 2016. interstitial lung disease was diagnosed according to the findings of pretreatment chest high-resolution computed tomography. Results Twelve patients were included (male, n = 11; female, n = 1). The overall response rate was 67% and the disease control rate was 100%. The median progression free survival was 5.1 months (95% CI: 2.9-8.3 months) and the median overall survival was 14.9 months (95% CI: 4.8-not reached). A chemotherapy-related acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease was observed in one patient; the extent of this event was Grade 2. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions Carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel, as a first-line chemotherapy regimen for non-small cell lung cancer, showed favorable efficacy and safety in patients with preexisting interstitial lung disease.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome and safety of the multidisciplinary strategy using cisplatin plus dose-dense paclitaxel (dose-dense TP) before and after radical hysterectomy (RH) for stage IB2, IIA2, or IIB patients with cervical cancer. In the dose-finding phase, 12 patients received 3 cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m2, day 1) with paclitaxel (70 or 80 mg/m2, days 1, 8, and 15) every 21 days as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). In the phase II study, 51 patients received 3 cycles of dose-dense TP at the recommended dose as NAC, and another 2 cycles of the same regimen after RH. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were 2-year overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs), response rate (RR), and pathological complete response (pCR) rates. The recommended dose of paclitaxel at dose-finding phase was 80 mg/m2. In the phase II study, 34 patients (66.7%) had FIGO stage IIB disease. The RR and pCR rates were 94 and 28%. With a median follow-up duration of 58 months, each of the 2- and 5-year PFS rates was 88.2%, the 2- and 5-year OS rates were 94.1 and 88.2%, respectively. The incidence of grade 3/4 AEs was neutropenia (34%), nausea (12%), appetite loss (10%), fatigue (6%), and anemia (6%). Febrile neutropenia was uncommon (2%). Dose-dense TP before and after RH achieved a good long-term survival and was feasible for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Introduction:We aimed to develop a more accurate model for predicting severe radiation pneumonitis (RP) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for non–small-cell lung cancer.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed data from 122 patients with locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Several dose-volume histogram metrics including absolute lung volume spared from a 5 Gy dose (VS5) were analyzed for an association with RP above NCI-CTC grade 3 (RP ≥ G3). Clinical factors including pulmonary fibrosis score (PFS) and pulmonary emphysema score on baseline chest computed tomography (CT) were also analyzed.Results:Fourteen patients (11.4%) developed RP greater than or equal to G3. On univariate analysis, all dose-volume histogram metrics, sex, and PFS on baseline CT were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with occurrence of RP greater than or equal to G3. Multivariate analysis revealed that V20 greater than or equal to 26%, VS5 less than 1500 cc, age greater than or equal to 68 years, and PFS on baseline CT greater than or equal to 2 were significant risk factors. Thus, we defined a new predictive risk score (PRS) that combines these factors. The cumulative incidence of RP greater than or equal to G3 at 12 months were 0%, 7.8%, 26.6%, and 71.4% when the PRS was 0, 3–5, 6–8, and 9–14, respectively (p < 0.001). This PRS was superior at predicting RP than both V20 and VS5 combined, or V20 alone by receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve, 0.888 versus 0.779 versus 0.678).Conclusions:V20, VS5, age, and PFS on baseline CT are independent and significant risk factors for occurrence of severe RP. Combining these factors may improve the predictability of severe RP.

Summary Background Four cycles of etoposide plus cisplatin and accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (AHTRT) is the standard of care for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Irinotecan plus cisplatin significantly improved overall survival compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive-stage SCLC. We compared these regimens for overall survival of patients with limited-stage SCLC. Methods We did this phase 3 study in 36 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included age 20–70 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–1, and adequate organ functions. Eligible patients with previously untreated limited-stage SCLC received one cycle of etoposide plus cisplatin (intravenous etoposide 100 mg/m 2 on days 1–3; intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 on day 1) plus AHTRT (1·5 Gy twice daily, 5 days a week, total 45 Gy over 3 weeks). Patients without progressive disease following induction therapy were randomised (1:1 ratio, using a minimisation method with biased-coin assignment balancing on ECOG performance status [0 vs 1], response to induction chemoradiotherapy [complete response plus near complete response vs partial response and stable disease], and institution) to receive either three further cycles of consolidation etoposide plus cisplatin or irinotecan plus cisplatin (intravenous irinotecan 60 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, 15; intravenous cisplatin 60 mg/m 2 on day 1). Patients, physicians, and investigators were aware of allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival after randomisation; primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00144989, and the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, number C000000095. Findings 281 patients were enrolled between Sept 1, 2002, and Oct 2, 2006. After induction etoposide plus cisplatin and AHTRT, 258 patients were randomised to consolidation etoposide plus cisplatin (n=129) or irinotecan plus cisplatin (n=129). In the etoposide plus cisplatin group, median overall survival was 3·2 years (95% CI 2·4–4·1). In the irinotecan and cisplatin group, median overall survival was 2·8 years (95% CI 2·4–3·6); overall survival did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio 1·09 [95% CI 0·80–1·46], one-sided stratified log-rank p=0·70). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia (120 [95%] in the etoposide plus cisplatin group vs 101 [78%] in the irinotecan plus cisplatin group), anaemia (44 [35%] vs 50 [39%]), thrombocytopenia (26 [21%] vs six [5%]), febrile neutropenia (21 [17%] vs 18 [14%]), and diarrhoea (two [2%] vs 13 [10%]). There was one treatment-related adverse event leading to death in each group (radiation pneumonitis in the etoposide plus cisplatin group; brain infarction in the irinotecan plus cisplatin group). Interpretation Four cycles of etoposide plus cisplatin and AHTRT should continue to be the standard of care for limited-stage SCLC. Funding National Cancer Center and the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan.

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate via combined analysis the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed monotherapy for chemo-naive elderly patients aged ≥80 with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a combined analysis from two phase II studies of pemetrexed for chemo-naive elderly (aged ≥75) (n = 47) and performance status 2 (n = 28) patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Population aged ≥80 (80+ Group) was compared to those aged 70–79 (70’s Group). We analyzed a total of 66 patients (37 70s and 29 80+ Groups) after exclusion of 4 ineligible and 5 aged ≤69 patients. Overall response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival of 70s vs. 80+ Groups were 13.5 vs. 13.8% [p = not significant (NS)], 67.6 vs. 58.6% (p = 0.608), 3.7 months vs. 4.2 months (p = 0.5588) and 18.5 vs. 13.5 months (p = 0.2621), respectively. Non-hematological and hematological toxicities ≥grade 3 of 70s vs. 80+ Groups were 24 vs. 35% (p = 0.4192) and 49 vs. 52% (p = NS), respectively. Dose reduction and/or delay due to toxicities of 70s vs. 80+ Groups was 19 vs. 28% (p = 0.7784). Febrile neutropenia and interstitial lung disease were not observed. Treatment-related death (bacterial pneumonia) was confirmed in one (3%) of 29 80+ Group patients. Pemetrexed monotherapy demonstrated similar efficacy and safety between aged ≥80 and aged 70–79 populations. It could be a therapeutic option in clinical practice for elderly non-squamous NSCLC patients aged ≥80 without indications of carboplatin-based combination regimens or docetaxel monotherapy.

Background: We evaluated the efficacy of aprepitant plus granisetron and an increased dose of dexamethasone in selected patients undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). Methods: Nondrinking women

BACKGROUND A previous phase 3 trial demonstrated noninferiority in terms of overall survival for combined S-1 (an oral fluoropyrimidine) and carboplatin compared with combined paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the current study, the authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined S-1, carboplatin, and bevacizumab followed by maintenance with S-1 and bevacizumab in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. METHODS Patients received carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve, 5 mg mL−1 per minute) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1 plus oral S-1 (80 mg/m2 per day) on days 1 through 14 every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. For patients without disease progression, S-1 and bevacizumab were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity developed. RESULTS Forty-eight patients were enrolled in the phase 2 study; of these, 35 patients (72.9%) completed at least 4 cycles. Most toxicities of grade ≥3 were hematologic, and no increase in relative incidence associated with maintenance with S-1 and bevacizumab was observed. The objective response rate was 54.2% (95% confidence interval, 39.2%-68.6%), and the median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3-8.2 months). CONCLUSIONS The regimen of combined S-1, carboplatin, and bevacizumab followed by maintenance with S-1 and bevacizumab was active and feasible as first-line treatment for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Cancer 2013;119:2275–2281. © 2013 American Cancer Society.

Objective: Introduction of NPC-05 (sterile graded talc) into Japanese clinical practice is expected to lead to persistent prevention of re-accumulation of MPE and alleviation of concomitant symptoms in patients, including dyspnea and chest pain. We conduct an investigator-initiated trial in Japan to clarify the efficacy and safety of NPC-05 for use as a pleurodesis agent. Methods: This study is a multicenter uncontrolled open-label phase II study. An uncontrolled open-label joint clinical study is conducted in 6 institutes, involving 30 patients with MPE. Conclusion: Sterile graded talc has been described as the most useful pleurodesis drug for treating malignant pleural effusion in many guidelines and meta-analyses; thus, it is used as a standard pleurodesis agent in Western countries. However, its efficacy and safety have not been examined in Japan. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of NC-05, sterile graded talc, in 30 Japanese patients with malignant pleural effusion.

Purpose This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II study (JO19907) compared the efficacy and safety of first-line carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP) alone with bevacizumab-CP in Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB, IV or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC were eligible for participation. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive bevacizumab-CP or CP alone. Chemotherapy was repeated for up to 6 cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab recipients who completed ≥3 cycles of chemotherapy could continue bevacizumab as monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results After confirming the tolerability of bevacizumab-CP in a small number of patients, 180 patients were recruited, of whom 121 were assigned to bevacizumab-CP and 59 to CP alone. Hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.61 with bevacizumab-CP versus CP alone ( p =0.0090; median 6.9 versus 5.9 months). Objective response rate was significantly higher with bevacizumab-CP than with CP alone (60.7% versus 31.0%; p =0.0013). Median overall survival was >22 months in both treatment groups (HR 0.99; p =0.9526). No new safety signals were detected. Conclusion Study JO19907 met its primary endpoint, demonstrating that the addition of bevacizumab to first-line CP significantly improves PFS in Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. This prolonged PFS by bevacizumab did not translate into OS benefit with the extremely longer underlying survival compared to historical data. No new safety signals were identified in this population. (Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center [JAPIC] registration number: CTI-060338).

Purpose We conducted a phase I trial of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan for the purpose of determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of topotecan when administered weekly to patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. Patients and Methods Twelve patients with stage IIIB or IV disease were treated with topotecan by 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. The dose was escalated in 2-mg/m 2 increments from the starting dose of 4 mg/m 2 until the MTD was reached. After the MTD had been reached in previously treated patients, chemotherapy-naive patients were enrolled for treatment at that dose, and the dose was escalated to estimate the MTD in the treatment-naive group. Results The MTD of topotecan was determined to be 6 mg/m 2 in the previously treated group and 8 mg/m 2 in the chemotherapy-naive group. All 3 previously treated patients experienced DLT at the 6-mg/m 2 dose level. Although only 1 of the 3 previously treated patients experienced DLT (grade 4 neutropenia for ≥ 3 days) at the 8-mg/m 2 dose level, skipping the topotecan dose on day 15 because of neutropenia was reported in 2 patients. Anorexia and general fatigue were the common nonhematologic toxicities. Conclusion The recommended dose of topotecan for phase II studies in previously untreated patients is 6 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days, and 4 mg/m 2 appears to be a suitable dose for use in previously treated patients with this schedule.

IntroductionThis post hoc analysis investigated the relationship between tumor response and overall survival (OS) in pretreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsWe conducted landmark survival analyses of V-15-32, a phase III study comparing gefitinib with docetaxel in pretreated advanced NSCLC. Best response at weeks 8, 12, 16, and 20, and visit response at week 4, were evaluated.ResultsDisease control (DC; complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease) was a better predictor of OS than CR/PR at all time points. The strongest predictor of OS for both gefitinib and docetaxel was DC at week 8 (hazard ratio [HR] DC versus non-DC: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20–0.45, p < 0.001 for both treatments). DC at week 4 was also associated with longer survival compared with non-DC for both treatments (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23–0.49, p < 0.001 for gefitinib; HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.19–0.47, p < 0.001 for docetaxel).DiscussionDC is a better predictor of OS with gefitinib and docetaxel than CR/PR in advanced pretreated NSCLC, with a best response of DC at week 8 the strongest predictor.

Purpose We conducted a phase I trial of BNP7787 (disodium 2,2′-dithio-bis-ethane sulfonate, Tavocept™), a novel chemoprotective and antitumor enhancing agent administered in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin. The primary aim was to determine a safe and potentially efficacious BNP7787 dose for preventing and mitigating paclitaxel- and cisplatin-induced toxicities and to evaluate for preliminary evidence of efficacy of treatment. Patients and methods Twenty-two patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received BNP7787 alone 1 week before co-administration of BNP7787 with paclitaxel followed by cisplatin. Twenty-one patients were treated with BNP7787 in escalating doses of 4.1–41.0 g/m2 concurrently with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Results The appropriate dose was determined to be 18.4 g/m2 of BNP7787 although no dose-limiting toxicity was observed up to 41.0 g/m2. Mild intravenous site discomfort, thirst, and nausea were the most common toxicities. One patient developed grade 2 skin rash, which was severe enough to preclude further study treatment. The AUC0-inf of the metabolite mesna was approximately 6.3% of the AUC0-inf of BNP7787. Co-administration of paclitaxel and cisplatin did not appear to influence the pharmacokinetics of BNP7787 and mesna. The overall response rate was encouraging; 43% including 11 patients with prior chemotherapy. Conclusions The recommended dose for phase II/III studies is 18.4 mg/m2 of BNP7787 in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin. Further studies are warranted to assess whether BNP7787 prevents and mitigates common and serious paclitaxel- and cisplatin-related side effects and enhances the efficacy of paclitaxel and cisplatin in advanced NSCLC patients.

This study aimed to identify predictive factors associated with prognostic benefits of gefitinib. A total of 221 Japanese patients who received gefitinib (250 mg day(-1)) were examined retrospectively and potential predictive factors analysed. Overall response rate (ORR) was 24.4% and median survival time (MST) was 8.0 months. In a log-rank test, survival was significantly better in females, patients with adenocarcinoma, never-smokers, favourable performance status (PS) and patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. The lower the smoking exposure (Brinkman Index (BI)=cigarettes per day x years smoked), the better the MST (BI 0: 14.5 months, BI500: 9.5 months, BI 500 to1000: 6.9 months, BIor =1000: 4.0 months). Positive-EGFR mutation status and PS 0-1 were independent predictors of favourable prognosis by multivariate analysis. Prognosis was significantly different according to EGFR mutation status (with the same smoking status), but not according to smoking status (with the same EGFR mutation status). EGFR mutation status is the most important independent predictor of survival benefit with gefitinib treatment. Although differences in prognosis were observed according to relative smoking status and smoking exposure, the results suggested that smoking is not a direct predictor of prognosis, yet is a surrogate marker of EGFR mutation status.

Purpose: We conducted a multicenter phase II study of amrubicin, a novel 9-aminoanthracycline, to evaluate its efficacy and safety in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Entry requirements included cytologically or histologically proven measurable NSCLC, stage III or IV, no prior therapy, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2, and adequate organ function. Amrubicin was given by daily intravenous injection at 45 mg/m2/day for three consecutive days, repeated at 3 week intervals. Each patient received at least three treatment cycles. Results: Sixty-two patients were enrolled in this study. Of the 62 registered patients, 60 were eligible and assessable for efficacy, and 59 for toxicity. Overall response rate was 18.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5 to 30.4%) and median survival time was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.7 to 10.4 months). Major toxicity was myelosuppression, with incidences of grade 3 or 4 toxicity of 78.0% for neutropenia, 54.2% for leukopenia, 30.5% for anemia, and 28.8% for thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological toxicities with a greater than 50% incidence were anorexia (69.5%), nausea/vomiting (55.9%), and alopecia (75.9%), but were relatively mild, with grade 3 toxicities observed in only one patient each (1.7%). Conclusion: Amrubicin was an active, well-tolerated agent in the treatment of NSCLC.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with minor mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene, except for the common 15 base-pair deletions in exon 19 and the L858R mutation in exon 21, is rare, and only few data exist on this patient population. The aim of the present study was to describe the clinical characteristics and to clarify the efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with NSCLC harboring minor mutations of the EGFR gene.This was a multicenter, retrospective study that analyzed specimens from patients with NSCLC who had minor EGFR gene mutations and were treated with EGFR-TKIs between June 2002 and March 2012.Out of 56 patients with minor mutations of the EGFR gene, 44 were treated with either gefitinib or erlotinib. Mutation sites were G719X in exon 18 (n=35), L861Q in exon 21 (n=11), and G874S in exon 21 (n=1). Three patients had both the G719S and the L861Q mutation. The response rate to TKI treatment was 29.5%, and the disease control rate was 63.6%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=2.06-8.66 months]. The median PFS was 7.2 months (95% CI=4.23-12.3 months) in 32 patients who received first- or second-line treatment with EGFR-TKIs, whereas the median PFS was 1.57 months (95% CI=0.73-3.8 months) in 12 patients treated with EGFR-TKIs as a third-line or later treatment. In multivariate Cox analysis, erlotinib therapy was associated with a longer PFS than gefitinib (p=0.025).Patients with NSCLC harboring minor mutations of the EGFR gene exhibited a modest response to EGFR-TKI treatment. Treatment with first-generation EGFR-TKIs, in particular erlotinib, may be considered a first- or second-line option for patients with NSCLC with minor EGFR mutations.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the preferred treatment for stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there have been few reports on combination chemotherapy with radiation for second- and third-generation antitumor drugs, although clinical guidelines have recommended the use of these drugs along with platinum agents.We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin and either S-1 or vinorelbine for treating stage III unresectable NSCLC patients who were treated with CCRT.Between September 2006 and May 2014, 56 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC were treated with CCRT with S-1 and cisplatin (median age: 63 years) and 58 patients were treated with CCRT with vinorelbine and cisplatin (median age: 61 years). The median follow-up time was 14.6 months in the S-1 arm and 28.0 months in the vinorelbine arm. We found no significant difference in progression-free survival (15.8 months vs. 10.1 months; p=0.15) and overall survival (33.7 months vs. 31.1 months; p=0.63) between the S-1 and vinorelbine arms, respectively. Severe (more than grade 3) leukopenia (35.7% vs. 98.2%; p0.01), neutropenia (44.6% vs. 98.2%; p0.01), and febrile neutropenia (1.8% vs. 46.6%, p0.01) were significantly less frequent in the S-1 arm than in the vinorelbine arm. Treatment-related deaths were not observed in either arm.CCRT with both S-1 or vinorelbine with cisplatin appears feasible based on their efficacy and toxicity profiles. Both treatments may be recommended as treatment options for patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC.

Purpose We initially conducted a randomized phase II study to compare irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) versus irinotecan, cisplatin, and etoposide (IPE) after etoposide and cisplatin (EP) with concurrent twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). We amended the protocol to evaluate IP after EP with concurrent twice-daily TRT in a single-arm phase II study because of an unacceptable toxicity in IPE. Patients and Methods Previously untreated patients with LD-SCLC were treated intravenously with etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 with concurrent twice-daily TRT (1.5 Gy per fraction, a total dose of 45 Gy) beginning on day 2 followed by three cycles of irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 4-week cycle. Results Of the 51 patients enrolled, 49 patients were assessable for response and toxicity. The overall response rate and complete response rate were 88% and 41%, respectively. The median survival time for all patients was 23 months. The 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 49% and 29.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 11.8 months. The major toxicities observed were neutropenia (grade 4, 84%), febrile neutropenia (grade 3, 31%), infection (grade 3 to 4, 33%), electrolytes imbalance (grade 3 to 4, 20%), and diarrhea (grade 3 to 4, 14%). Conclusion EP with concurrent twice-daily TRT followed by the consolidation of IP appears to be an active regimen which deserves further phase III testing in patients with LD-SCLC.

Objectives: The combination of irinotecan and cisplatin given every 4 weeks is one of the standard treatments for advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and dose-intensity as a measure of the feasibility of 3-week scheduling of irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC in phase II study. Methods: Previously untreated patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC were treated intravenously with irinotecan (60 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. Results: Of the 28 patients enrolled, 27 were evaluable for response and toxicity. The response rate was 30% (95% confidence interval, 14–50%). The median duration of response was 16 weeks (range, 10–26 weeks). The median survival time for all patients was 52 weeks and the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 48% and 29%, respectively. The dose-intensity of irinotecan was 34 mg/m2/wk (range, 19–40). The major toxicities observed were neutropenia (grade 3, 30%; 4, 30%), leukopenia (grade 3, 30%), and diarrhea (grade 3, 22%). Other toxicities were generally mild. Conclusions: Three-week scheduling of irinotecan and cisplatin is effective and feasible in advanced NSCLC.

Purpose Docetaxel has shown activity in elderly patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This randomized phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel versus vinorelbine (the current standard treatment) in elderly patients. Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients age 70 years or older with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and performance status 2 or lower were eligible. Patients randomly received docetaxel 60 mg/m2 (day 1) or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) every 21 days for four cycles. The primary end point was overall survival. Overall disease-related symptom improvement was assessed using an eight-item questionnaire. Results In total, 182 patients were enrolled. Median age was 76 years (range, 70 years to 86 years). There was no statistical difference in median overall survival with docetaxel versus vinorelbine (14.3 months v 9.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.780; 95% CI, 0.561 to 1.085; P = .138). There was a significant difference in median progression-free survival (5.5 months v 3.1 months; P < .001). Response rates were also significantly improved with docetaxel versus vinorelbine (22.7% v 9.9%; P = .019). The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia (82.9% for docetaxel; 69.2% for vinorelbine; P = .031) and leukopenia (58.0% for docetaxel; 51.7% for vinorelbine). Other toxicities were mild and generally well tolerated. Docetaxel improved overall disease-related symptoms over vinorelbine (odds ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.20). Conclusion Docetaxel improved progression-free survival, response rate, and disease-related symptoms versus vinorelbine. Overall survival was not statistically significantly improved at this time. Docetaxel monotherapy may be considered as an option in the standard treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

EKB-569 is a potent, low molecular weight, selective, and irreversible inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that is being developed as an anticancer agent. A phase 1, dose-escalation study was conducted in Japanese patients. EKB-569 was administered orally, once daily, in 28-day cycles, to patients with advanced-stage malignancies known to overexpress EGFR. Two patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations and acquired gefitinib resistance from the phase 1 study are described in detail. Case #1 is a 63-year-old man with smoking history. He received treatment from 4 March 2004. Because he had no severe adverse events, a total of 10 courses of therapy were completed through December 16. Grade 2 skin rash and ALT elevation, and grade 1 diarrhea and nail changes developed. A chest CT scan on 4 August 2003 revealed multiple pulmonary metastases that had decreased in size. Case #2 is a 49-year-old woman with no smoking history. She received therapy from 9 February 2004. She received a total of five courses of the therapy until 22 June 2004. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting and grade 1 diarrhea and dry skin developed. A chest CT scan on March 3 revealed multiple pulmonary metastases that had decreased in size. A brain MRI on March 4 showed that multiple brain metastases also had decreased in size. Based on RECIST criteria, they had stable disease but radiographic tumor regression was observed.

Purpose: Irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) significantly improved survival compared with etoposide and cisplatin (EP), in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in a previous Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) randomized trial. JCOG9903 was conducted to evaluate the safety of sequentially given IP following concurrent EP plus twice-daily thoracic irradiation (TRT) for the treatment of limited-stage SCLC (LSCLC). Experimental Design: Between October 1999 and July 2000, 31 patients were accrued from 10 institutions. Thirty patients were assessable for toxicity, response, and survival. Treatment consisted of etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3, cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, and concurrent twice-daily TRT of 45 Gy beginning on day 2. The IP regimen started on day 29 and consisted of irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, with three 28-day cycles. Results: There were no treatment-related deaths. The response rate was 97% (complete response, 37%; partial response, 60%). Median overall survival was 20.2 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 76%, 41%, and 38%, respectively. Of the 24 patients who started the IP regimen, 22 received two or more cycles. Hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included neutropenia (67%), anemia (50%), and thrombocytopenia (4%). Nonhematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included diarrhea (8%), vomiting (8%), and febrile neutropenia (8%). Of the 20 patients with recurrence, none had local recurrence alone and only two had both local and distant metastasis as the initial sites of disease progression. Conclusions: IP following concurrent EP plus twice-daily TRT is safe with acceptable toxicities. A randomized phase III trial comparing EP with IP following EP plus concurrent TRT for LSCLC is ongoing (JCOG0202).

Irinotecan hydrochloride, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is effective against small-cell lung cancer. In a phase 2 study of irinotecan plus cisplatin in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer, there was a high response rate and a promising median survival time.We conducted a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study in which we compared irinotecan plus cisplatin with etoposide plus cisplatin in patients with extensive (metastatic) small-cell lung cancer.The planned size of the study population was 230 patients, but enrollment was terminated early because an interim analysis found a statistically significant difference in survival between the patients assigned to receive irinotecan and cisplatin and those assigned to receive etoposide and cisplatin; as a result, only 154 patients were enrolled. The median survival was 12.8 months in the irinotecan-plus-cisplatin group and 9.4 months in the etoposide-plus-cisplatin group (P=0.002 by the unadjusted log-rank test). At two years, the proportion of patients surviving was 19.5 percent in the irinotecan-plus-cisplatin group and 5.2 percent in the etoposide-plus-cisplatin group. Severe or life-threatening myelosuppression was more frequent in the etoposide-plus-cisplatin group than in the irinotecan-plus-cisplatin group, and severe or life-threatening diarrhea was more frequent in the irinotecan-plus-cisplatin group than in the etoposide-plus-cisplatin group.Irinotecan plus cisplatin is an effective treatment for metastatic small-cell lung cancer.

Objectives We have conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutation positive and for whom EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) 1st-line has failed. Materials and methods Patients with stage IIIB or IV non-squamous NSCLC harbored activating EGFR mutations that has failed 1st-line EGFR-TKI and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were included in this study. Patients received carboplatin at an area under the concentration–time curve 5 or 6, paclitaxel 200mg/m 2 , and bevacizumab 15mg/kg on D1. The combination therapy was repeated every 21 days for up to three to six cycles. Bevacizumab was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for patients without disease progression (PD). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results Thirty-one patients were enrolled between March 2010 and January 2013, with 30 patients being eligible. ORR was 37% (90% CI; 24–52%) and disease control rate, 83% (95% CI; 66–92%). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.6 months (95% CI; 4.8–12.0 months) and median overall survival, 18.2 months (95% CI; 12.0–23.4 months). The most common grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (93%), and non-hematologic toxicity, febrile neutropenia (20%). There were no clinically relevant grade ≥3 bleeding events and no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion The combination therapy of carboplatin, paclitaxel and bevacizumab did not achieve the initial treatment goal.

Platinum agents are essential for treating gynecological malignancies, particularly ovarian cancer. However, multiple carboplatin doses may cause hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Carboplatin desensitization prevents life-threatening HSRs and promotes the successful completion of planned chemotherapy. Since January 2010, carboplatin desensitization was performed at our institution. Solutions with 1/1000, 1/100, and 1/10 dilutions of carboplatin and an undiluted solution were prepared in 250 mL of 5 % glucose. Each solution was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion (4-step 4-h protocol). This retrospective analysis was approved by the institutional review board. From January 2010 to December 2013, 20 patients with gynecological malignancies (median age 62 years, range 43–74 years) received desensitization treatment. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages at presentation were I, II, III, and IV in 1, 1, 15, 13 patients, respectively. During first-line and second-line treatments, 3 and 17 patients, respectively, experienced carboplatin-induced HSRs. The median carboplatin cycle number was 11 (range 2–16). In the first desensitization cycle, 17 (85 %) patients completed treatment without adverse events, 2 experienced Grade 1 HSRs but completed treatment, and 1 experienced Grade 3 HSR and discontinued treatment. The first desensitization cycle completion rate was 95 %. Of 83 desensitization cycles administered, 79 (95.2 %) were completed. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Most patients completed the planned chemotherapy. Our protocol could be conducted safely with shorter duration and simpler procedures than previous protocols. Carboplatin desensitization seems beneficial for patients with a history of carboplatin-induced HSRs; however, the risk of HSR recurrence still remains. Desensitization should therefore be performed only by well-trained staff.

BACKGROUND Bis-acetato-ammine-dichloro-cyclohexylamine-platinum(IV) (JM216) is the first orally given platinum complex that shows in vitro cytotoxicity comparable to that of cisplatin and in vivo cytotoxicity superior to those of cisplatin and carboplatin. METHODS We conducted an escalating-dose (50, 75, 100, 120 mg/m2) phase I study of JM216 administered orally once a day for five consecutive days in patients with solid tumors to establish the toxicity profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetic profile. Twenty-three patients were enrolled and all were assessable for toxicity. RESULTS The MTD was 120 mg/m2/day and the dose-limiting toxicities were leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia and diarrhea. Because of the delayed hematological toxicities, it was difficult to repeat cycles every 26 days in some patients. Tumor shrinkage was observed in two patients with breast cancer, both of whom were resistant to doxorubicin. A pharmacokinetic study showed that the areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) for total platinum (Pt) on days 1 and 5 and ultrafiltered Pt (UF-Pt) on day 1 increased in proportion to the dose of JM216. The AUCs for both total and UF-Pt on day 5 were higher than the AUCs on day 1. The AUC for UF-Pt on day 5 showed the best correlation with percentage reduction in leukocyte count and in absolute neutrophil count. CONCLUSION The recommended dose for phase II studies is 100 mg/m2/day every 4-6 weeks. The observation of tumor shrinkage in previously heavily treated breast cancer patients supports a phase II investigation.

Background: To determine the efficacy, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of intrapleural cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide as a treatment for malignant pleural effusions (MPE) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Seventy patients with MPE associated with NSCLC were enrolled in this study. In 68 patients, a catheter was inserted into the pleural cavity, within 24 h after complete drainage of the pleural effusion, CDDP (80 mg/m2) and etoposide (80 mg/m2) were simultaneously administered successfully via the catheter and the catheter was clamped. Seventy-two hours later, the catheter was unclamped to allow drainage. The catheter was removed when the accumulated intrapleural fluid decreased to 20 ml or less per day. Results: The pharmacokinetic profiles showed high maximum concentrations of CDDP (free form, 88 µg/ml) and etoposide (182.4 µg/ml) in intrapleural fluids. CDDP did not remain for a long period (free form, β-phase half-life = 10.51 h) in the fluids, while etoposide persisted for a long period (β-phase half-life = 62.53 h). The overall response rate was 46.2%, the median survival time 32.3 weeks, the 1-year survival rate 28.7% and the 2-year survival rate 12.8%. The most serious adverse reactions were WHO grade 3 anemia (3 patients), grade 3 nausea and vomiting (17 patients), grade 3 constipation (1 patient), grade 3 pulmonary toxicity (1 patient), grade 4 fever (1 patient), grade 3 infection (1 patient) and grade 3 mental disorder (1 patient). Conclusion: Intrapleural administration of CDDP and etoposide was an effective and acceptable regimen for patients with MPE due to NSCLC.

(E)-2'-deoxy-2'-(fluoromethylene)cytidine (FMdC), one of the most potent inhibitors of ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase, was selected for clinical development because of its novel mechanisms of action, and strong antitumor activity against experimental tumor models. This study was designed to determine the toxicities, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetic profile of FMdC. FMdC was given orally for 5 consecutive days every 3 or 4 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors. The starting dose was 8 mg/m2/day. Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out on days 1 through 5 of the first cycle. Ten patients with non-small cell lung cancer received 15 courses of FMdC at doses which were de-escalated from 8 mg/m2/day to 2 mg/m2/day because of unexpected severe toxicities at the starting dose level. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Thrombocytopenia and anemia were mild. Flu-like symptoms and fever were the common non-hematologic toxicities. The MTD was 4 mg/m2/day, since four of six patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia. At the 4 mg/m2/day dose level, the mean terminal half-life, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), plasma clearance, and mean residence time on day 1 were 3.20 h, 15.8 ng/ml, 2.91 l/h/kg, and 4.03 h, respectively. The recommended dose for phase II studies with this schedule is also 4 mg/m2/day for 5 days. Further investigations are necessary to establish optimal dosing schedules and routes for the administration of FMdC.

Purpose: This phase II study was conducted to determine the response and toxicity of gemcitabine (2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine) in chemotherapy-naive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A group of 73 patients were entered into the study. The patients had received no previous chemotherapy and all had measurable disease. The initial starting dose of gemcitabine was 1000 mg/m2 per week × 3 followed by a week of rest, and was escalated for the next cycle to 1250 mg/m2, provided there were no signs of hematologic toxicity (WBC

Objective: Pemetrexed has relatively mild toxicity and possibly can be administered long term to patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. We conducted a Phase II trial to evaluate the effi- cacy and safety of pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive elderly patients with advanced non- squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Methods: In this multicenter Phase II trial, we recruited elderly patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients with previously untreated Stage IIIB or IV non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, 75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 and adequate organ functions were eligible. Patients received pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 ) intravenously on Day 1 every 3 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was ob- jective response rate. Results: Forty-seven patients were enrolled from August 2009 to July 2011, and 46 patients were eligible. The median age was 79 years (range 75-91 years), 57% were males, 37% had never smoked, 87% had adenocarcinoma, 74% had Stage IV and 33% had epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase-activating mutation. The median number of cycles was 4 (1-20). The objective response rate was 13.3% (95% confidence interval; 5.1-26.8%), the disease control rate was 66.7% (95% confidence interval 51.0-80.0%), the median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (95% confidence interval 3.0-6.1 months) and the median overall sur- vival was 18.2 months (95% confidence interval 13.2-23.5 months). One Grade 5 infection (pneumonia) was observed. Conclusions: This study did not meet the primary endpoint. Pemetrexed monotherapy is not recommended in chemotherapy-naive elderly patients aged 75 years with advanced non- squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Pemetrexed has shown substantial activity in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is one of the current standard agents in second-line settings due to its efficacy and favorable tolerability profile. We conducted phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pemetrexed in Japanese patients with previously heavily treated, advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Patients with stage IIIB or IV non-squamous NSCLC, performance status (PS) 0–2, previous two to five regimens of chemotherapy were enrolled and received pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) on day 1 every 21 days until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. From August 2009 to May 2010, 46 patients were enrolled: median age 65 years; 52 % women; PS 0/1/2 26/67/7 %; previous treatment regimen 2/3/4/5 48/28/20/4 %; epidermal growth factor receptor activating mutation positive/wild/unknown 30/48/22 %. The median follow-up period was 13.5 months. The median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range 1–18 cycles). The median PFS was 5.2 months (95 % CI 3.0–5.8 months). The median OS was 14.4 months (95 % CI 9.4–21.3 months). The ORR was 8.7 % and DCR was 63.0 %. The grade 3/4 hematological adverse events include 8 patients with leukopenia, 11 with neutropenia, 5 with anemia, and 2 with thrombocytopenia. There were no reports of febrile neutropenia and no treatment-related death was observed. Treatment with pemetrexed in previously heavily treated Japanese non-squamous NSCLC patients is feasible and shows encouraging activity.

Data on 16 potential risk factors for myelosuppression were assessed in 134 patients who received either vindesine and cisplatin (VP) or mitomycin C, vindesine and cisplatin (MVP) for inoperable stage III or IV non-small cell lung cancer in a randomized trial. Determinant factors for myelosuppression were evaluated by using univariate analysis and the logistic regression model. Recursive partitioning and amalgamation (RPA) was also used to define patient subgroups frequently suffering from severe bone marrow toxicity. Overall, 33 (25%) of 134 patients experienced at least one episode of grade 4 leukopenia. In univariate analysis, age, body surface area, serum creatinine, and pretreatment hemoglobin concentration were associated with severe leukopenia. A multivariate analysis using the logistic regression method showed that only raised creatinine level was an independent predictor for grade 4 leukopenia (P = 0.049). The RPA model generated three distinct subgroups based on age, body surface area and regimen. The three subgroups were distinguished by the frequency of severe (grade 4) leukopenia (50%, 25%, and 2.4%, respectively) (P0.001). Grade 4 leukopenia occurred more frequently in patients in class 3 (ageor = 65 years and treatment with MVP). The RPA model was useful in identifying the risk factors for myelosuppression induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and in defining patient subgroups with elevated risk of toxicity.

Two phase I trials of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with cisplatin were conducted. In both cases, the dose-limiting toxicities were leukopenia and/or diarrhea. During these trials the pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), were investigated to evaluate the relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and diarrhea, since this is an unpredictable and severe toxicity of combination chemotherapy using CPT-11 and cisplatin. Twenty-three previously untreated patients with advanced lung cancer were evaluated in the pharmacokinetic study. Ten patients received CPT-11 at 80 or 90 mg/m2 plus cisplatin at 60 mg/m2. The other 13 patients received CPT-11 at 80 or 90 mg/m2 plus cisplatin at 80 mg/m2 with the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (2 micrograms/kg x 16 days). CPT-11 was given as a 90-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15. Cisplatin was given on day 1. The pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and SN-38 were analyzed on day 8 during the first course of treatment. The maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 was 90 mg/m2 in both phase I trials. The severity of diarrhea was best correlated with the peak plasma concentration of SN-38 among the pharmacokinetic parameters tested. In addition, patients with a plasma SN-38 level > 12.4 ng/ml at 1.75 h after the start of CPT-11 infusion had a higher incidence of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grade 3-4 diarrhea than those with a lower SN-38 level (P = 0.0003). Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the SN-38 concentration as a significant contributor to the development of diarrhea (P = 0.0021). We conclude that there is a clear relationship between the SN-38 concentration and diarrhea during chemotherapy with CPT-11 plus cisplatin.