Search

Objective: We aim to examine whether outcomes of preterm birth (PTB) are further modified by the indication for delivery., Study Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all singletons delivered at 23 to 34 weeks from 2011 to 2014. Women were classified by their primary indication for delivery: maternal (preeclampsia) or fetal/obstetric (growth restriction, nonreassuring fetal status, and vaginal bleeding). The primary neonatal outcome was a composite of neonatal death, cord pH <7 or base excess < - 12, 5-minute Apgar ≤3, C-reactive protein during resuscitation, culture-proven sepsis, intraventricular hemorrhage, and necrotizing enterocolitis. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome. Groups were compared using Student's t -test and chi-squared tests. Logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding variables., Results: Of 528 women, 395 (74.8%) were delivered for maternal and 133 (25.2%) for fetal/obstetric indications. Compared with those delivered for a maternal indication, those with a fetal/obstetric indication for delivery had an increased risk of the composite neonatal outcome (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-3.21) and acidemia at birth (AOR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.89-9.55)., Conclusion: Preterm infants delivered for fetal/obstetric indications have worsened outcomes compared with those delivered for maternal indications. Additional research is needed to further tailor counseling specific to the indication for delivery., Competing Interests: None., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Objective: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in women who underwent induction of labor or planned cesarean delivery in indicated preterm births before 34 weeks of gestation., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all indicated singleton preterm births (23-34 weeks of gestation) in a tertiary center from 2011 to 2014. The primary maternal outcome was a composite of early postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, operative complications, postpartum complications, and clinical chorioamnionitis. The primary neonatal outcome was a composite of neonatal death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the delivery room, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, culture-proven sepsis, birth trauma, arterial cord gas pH less than 7 or base excess less than -12, and 5-minute Apgar score 3 or less. Outcomes were compared by intended mode of delivery (induction of labor compared with cesarean) and adjusted for confounders. In secondary analyses, maternal and neonatal outcomes based on the intended mode of delivery were stratified by gestational age (23-27 6/7, 28-31 6/7, and 32-33 6/7 weeks of gestation)., Results: Of 629 patients with indicated early preterm births during the study period, 331 (53%) underwent induction of labor, of whom 208 (63%) delivered vaginally. Induction of labor was not associated with an increased risk of the primary maternal (16.3% compared with 19.5%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.3) or neonatal composite outcome (14.5% compared with 35.9%, adjusted OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.1). Analyses stratified by gestational age were consistent with the overall analysis., Conclusion: Maternal and neonatal outcomes do not differ based on the intended mode of delivery. Induction of labor should be considered when early preterm birth is indicated.

Background: When delivery is indicated prior to 34 weeks, many providers perform a cesarean delivery rather than induce labor based on perceptions of a high failure rate. Given the morbidity of cesarean delivery, an accurate estimate of the success rate and factors associated with success in preterm induction of labor is important in management decisions., Objective: We sought to develop a prediction model for successful induction of labor in preterm patients using factors known at the time the decision is made to deliver., Study Design: A retrospective cohort study of all live singletons undergoing an indicated induction of labor between 23 and 34 0/7 weeks from 2011 through 2015. Pregnancies with major fetal anomalies or no intrapartum fetal monitoring were excluded. Successful induction of labor was defined as vaginal delivery. The cohort was randomly split into a training cohort to develop a prediction model for vaginal delivery and a validation cohort to test the model. Factors significantly associated with vaginal delivery were identified using univariate analyses, and candidate factors were used in the multivariate logistic regression model. Only factors known at the start of the induction of labor were used in the model. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were created to estimate the predictive value of the model. Sensitivity and specificity of the model were assessed., Results: Of 331 patients who underwent induction of labor, 208 (62.8%) delivered vaginally and 123 (37.1%) by cesarean delivery. Of the factors significantly associated with cesarean delivery, the final model included gestational age, simplified Bishop score, suspected intrauterine growth retardation, chronic hypertension, and body mass index. In the training cohort, the model correctly classified 72.3% of subjects with a sensitivity (cesarean delivery predicted/cesarean delivery performed) of 56.7% and a specificity (vaginal delivery predicted/vaginal delivery performed) of 84.1%. When applied to the validation cohort, 73.9% of subjects were correctly classified, with a sensitivity of 44.6% and specificity of 89.0%. Receiver-operating characteristic curves had an area under the curve of 0.75 for the training cohort and 0.77 for the validation cohort., Conclusion: More than 60% of women undergoing induction of labor at <34 0/7 weeks deliver vaginally. For women undergoing induction of labor at <34 0/7 weeks, this prediction model rarely classifies individuals who can have a vaginal delivery as needing a cesarean delivery. This model may provide an accurate assessment tool to evaluate which patients will likely deliver vaginally to avoid the morbidity of cesarean delivery while conversely identifying subjects at high risk of cesarean delivery <34 0/7 weeks., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)