Search

Introduction: Cabergoline is the treatment of choice for prolactinomas. However, 10–20% of prolactinomas are resistant to cabergoline. Metformin, a biguanide widely used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus, has been shown to reduce prolactin secretion in various pituitary tumor-cell lineages both in vitro and in vivo and in human pituitary adenomas in vitro. The aim of this study is to test the effects of metformin addition to cabergoline treatment on prolactin levels in patients with resistant prolactinomas. Subjects and Methods: This is a prospective study performed in an outpatient clinic in a reference center. Ten adult patients (26–61 years) with prolactinomas (7 M), persistent hyperprolactinemia (38–386 ng/mL) under cabergoline treatment (2–7 mg/week) for at least 6 months (6–108 months), features of metabolic syndrome, and not taking metformin were included. Metformin (1.0–2.5 g v.o./day) was given according to patients’ tolerance. Cabergoline doses were kept unchanged. Serum prolactin levels were measured before and after short- (30–60 days) and long-term (120–180 days) metformin treatment. Results: Mean prolactin levels did not show any significant changes (148 ± 39 vs. 138 ± 42 vs. 133 ± 39 ng/mL, before, at 30–60 days, and at 120–180 days, respectively, p = 0.196) after metformin (mean dose: 1.25 g/day; range: 1.0–2.0 g/day). No patient reached a normal prolactin level during metformin treatment. Two patients were considered partial responders for exhibiting prolactin decreases ≥50% at a single time point during metformin. Conclusion: Metformin addition to ongoing high-dose cabergoline treatment in patients with cabergoline-resistant prolactinomas failed to show a consistent inhibitory effect in serum prolactin levels.

Introduction: Prolactinomas are the most frequent pituitary-secreting tumors. Medical therapy with cabergoline (CAB), a dopamine agonist (DA), is the first line treatment, but 10% of prolactinomas are resistant to CAB. Recently, in vitro studies have shown anti-tumoral activity of metformin and other biguanids in human prolactinomas1, which prompted us to investigate that possibility in vivo. Aim: To evaluate the effect of metformin (MET) on Prolactin (PRL) secretion in patients with CAB resistant prolactinomas. Design and Setting: Prospective interventional study in a single referral center. Subjects: Ten patients (7 M; mean age: 44 ± 12y) with CAB resistant (PRL: 148 ± 125ng/ml; range: 38 - 386) prolactinomas (all macroadenomas) and metabolic syndrome on maximally tolerated CAB doses (4.3 ± 1.2 mg/week; range: 2.0-7.0) for ≥ 6 months (45 ± 39mo; range: 6-120). Intervention: Oral extended release metformin (p.o.) was prescribed according to patient’s tolerance (mean dose: 1.3 ± 0.4 g; range: 1.0-2.0). Main Outcome Measurements: Serum PRL (Elecsys, Roche, Indianapolis, USA), body weight (BW), fasting glycemia (FG) and HbA1C were evaluated before and at two time points during metformin treatment (30-60 and 120-180 days). Results: BW, FG, and/or HbA1C reductions were observed in 9/10 patients and mean FG decreased significantly (P=0.04). No significant changes were observed in serum PRL levels during metformin treatment [134 ± 124 ng/ml vs 138 ± 132 ng/ml vs 144 ± 129 ng/ml, before, at 30-60 days and at 120-180 days, respectively (P=0.499, mixed-effects analysis with the Geisser-Greenhouse correction)]. Individually, two patients exhibited a ≥ 50% decrease in PRL levels at a single timepoint (one at 30-60 days, with a further increase at 120-180 days and the other at 120-180 days). Conclusion: Metformin, at usual doses, did not inhibit prolactin secretion in patients with cabergoline-resistant prolactinomas. The discrepancy between our results and in vitro studies is not clear, but may be related to the much higher concentrations of metformin used in vitro1 as compared to the serum concentrations observed in patients during metformin treatment2. References: 1Gao J et al. Metformin inhibits growth and prolactin secretion of pituitary prolactinoma cells and xenografts. J Cell Mol Med. 2018 22:6368-79; 2 Frid A et al. Novel assay of metformin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes and varying levels of renal function: clinical recommendations. Diabetes Care 2010 33:1291-3.

Objective Investigate the therapeutic response of acromegaly patients to pegvisomant (PEGV) in a real-life, Brazilian multicenter study. Subjects and methods Characteristics of acromegaly patients treated with PEGV were reviewed at diagnosis, just before and during treatment. All patients with at least two IGF-I measurements on PEGV were included. Efficacy was defined as any normal IGF-I measurement during treatment. Safety data were reviewed. Predictors of response were determined by comparing controlled versus uncontrolled patients. Results 109 patients [61 women; median age at diagnosis 34 years; 95.3% macroadenomas] from 10 Brazilian centers were studied. Previous treatment included surgery (89%), radiotherapy (34%), somatostatin receptor ligands (99%), and cabergoline (67%). Before PEGV, median levels of GH, IGF-I and IGF-I % of upper limit of normal were 4.3 µg/L, 613 ng/mL, and 209%, respectively. Pre-diabetes/diabetes was present in 48.6% and tumor remnant in 71% of patients. Initial dose was 10 mg/day in all except 4 cases, maximum dose was 30 mg/day, and median exposure time was 30.5 months. PEGV was used as monotherapy in 11% of cases. Normal IGF-I levels was obtained in 74.1% of patients. Glycemic control improved in 56.6% of patients with pre-diabetes/diabetes. Exposure time, pre-treatment GH and IGF-I levels were predictors of response. Tumor enlargement occurred in 6.5% and elevation of liver enzymes in 9.2%. PEGV was discontinued in 6 patients and 3 deaths unrelated to the drug were reported. Conclusions In a real-life scenario, PEGV is a highly effective and safe treatment for acromegaly patients not controlled with other therapies.

Congenital hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (CHH) is a challenging inherited endocrine disorder characterised by absent or incomplete pubertal development and infertility as a result of the low action/secretion of the hypothalamic gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Given a growing list of gene mutations accounting for CHH, the application of massively parallel sequencing comprises an excellent molecular diagnostic approach because it enables the simultaneous evaluation of many genes. The present study proposes the use of whole exome sequencing (WES) to identify causative and modifying mutations based on a phenotype-genotype CHH analysis using an in-house exome pipeline. Based on 44 known genes related to CHH in humans, we were able to identify a novel homozygous gonadotrophin-releasing hormone receptor (GNRHR) p.Thr269Met mutant, which segregates with the CHH kindred and was predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. A functional study measuring intracellular inositol phosphate (IP) when stimulated with GnRH on COS-7 cells confirmed that the p.Thr269Met GnRHR mutant performed greatly diminished IP accumulation relative to the transfected wild-type GnRHR. Additionally, the proband carries three heterozygous variants in CCDC141 and one homozygous in SEMA3A gene, although their effects with respect to modifying the phenotype are uncertain. Because they do not segregate with reproductive phenotype in family members, we advocate they do not contribute to CHH oligogenicity. WES proved to be useful for CHH molecular diagnosis and reinforced its benefit with respect to identifying heterogeneous genetic disorders. Our findings expand the GnRHR mutation spectrum and phenotype-genotype correlation in CHH.

In type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), growth hormone (GH) responses to provocative stimuli are normal or exaggerated, whereas the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis has been less studied. Ghrelin is a GH secretagogue that also increases adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol levels, similarly to GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6). Ghrelin's effects in patients with T1DM have not been evaluated. We therefore studied GH, ACTH, and cortisol responses to ghrelin and GHRP-6 in 9 patients with T1DM and 9 control subjects. The GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH release was also evaluated. Mean fasting GH levels (micrograms per liter) were higher in T1DM (3.5 ± 1.2) than in controls (0.6 ± 0.3). In both groups, ghrelin-induced GH release was higher than that after GHRP-6 and GHRH. When analyzing Δ area under the curve (ΔAUC) GH values after ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH, no significant differences were observed in T1DM compared with controls. There was a trend (P = .055) to higher mean basal cortisol values (micrograms per deciliter) in T1DM (11.7 ± 1.5) compared with controls (8.2 ± 0.8). No significant differences were seen in ΔAUC cortisol values in both groups after ghrelin and GHRP-6. Mean fasting ACTH values were similar in T1DM and controls. No differences were seen in ΔAUC ACTH levels in both groups after ghrelin and GHRP-6. In summary, patients with T1DM have normal GH responsiveness to ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH. The ACTH and cortisol release after ghrelin and GHRP-6 is also similar to controls. Our results suggest that chronic hyperglycemia of T1DM does not interfere with GH-, ACTH-, and cortisol-releasing mechanisms stimulated by these peptides.

In thyrotoxicosis GH responses to stimuli are diminished and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is hyperactive. There are no data on ghrelin or GHRP-6-induced GH, ACTH and cortisol release in treated hyperthyroidism. We, therefore, evaluated these responses in 10 thyrotoxic patients before treatment and in 7 of them after treatment. GHRH-induced GH release was also studied. Peak GH (μg/L; mean ± SE) values after ghrelin (22.6 ± 3.9), GHRP-6 (13.8 ± 2.3) and GHRH (4.9 ± 0.9) were lower in hyperthyroidism before treatment compared to controls (ghrelin: 67.6 ± 19.3; GHRP-6: 25.4 ± 2.7; GHRH: 12.2 ± 2.8) and did not change after 6 months of euthyroidism (ghrelin: 32.7 ± 4.7; GHRP-6: 15.6 ± 3.6; GHRH: 7.4 ± 2.3), although GH responses to all peptides increased in ~50% of the patients. In thyrotoxicosis before treatment ACTH response to ghrelin was two fold higher (107.4 ± 26.3) than those of controls (54.9 ± 10.3), although not significantly. ACTH response to GHRP-6 was similar in both groups (hyperthyroid: 44.7 ± 9.0; controls: 31.3 ± 7.9). There was a trend to a decreased ACTH response to ghrelin after 3 months of euthyroidism (35.6 ± 5.3; P = 0.052), but after 6 months this decrease was non-significant (50.7 ± 14.0). After 3 months ACTH response to GHRP-6 decreased significantly (20.4 ± 4.2), with no further changes. In hyperthyroidism before treatment, peak cortisol (μg/dL) responses to ghrelin (18.2 ± 1.2) and GHRP-6 (15.9 ± 1.4) were comparable to controls (ghrelin: 16.4 ± 1.6; GHRP-6: 13.5 ± 0.9) and no changes were seen after treatment. Our results suggest that the pathways of GH release after ghrelin/GHRP-6 and GHRH are similarly affected by thyroid hormone excess and hypothalamic mechanisms of ACTH release modulated by ghrelin/GHSs may be activated in this situation.

Background In Cushing's disease (CD), adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH)/cortisol responses to growth hormone secretagogues (GHS), such as ghrelin and GHRP-6, are exaggerated. The effect of clinical treatment of hypercortisolism with ketoconazole on ACTH secretion in CD is controversial. There are no studies evaluating ACTH/cortisol responses to GHS after prolonged ketoconazole use in these patients. Objective To compare ghrelin- and GHRP-6-induced ACTH/cortisol release before and after ketoconazole treatment in patients with CD. Design/patients Eight untreated patients with CD (BMI: 28.5 +/- 0.8 kg/m(2)) were evaluated before and after 3 and 6 months of ketoconazole treatment and compared with 11 controls (BMI: 25.0 +/- 0.8). Results After ketoconazole use, mean urinary free cortisol values decreased significantly (before: 613.6 +/- 95.2 nmol/24 h; 3rd month: 170.0 +/- 27.9; 6th month: 107.9 +/- 30.1). The same was observed with basal serum cortisol (before: 612.5 +/- 69.0 nmol/l; 3rd month: 463.5 +/- 44.1; 6th month: 402.8 +/- 44.1) and ghrelin- and GHRP-6-stimulated peak cortisol levels (before: 1183.6 +/- 137.9 and 1045.7 +/- 132.4; 3rd month: 637.3 +/- 69.0 and 767.0 +/- 91.0; 6th month: 689.8 +/- 74.5 and 571.1 +/- 71.7 respectively). An increase in basal ACTH (before: 11.2 +/- 1.6 pmol/l; 6th month: 19.4 +/- 2.7) and in ghrelin-stimulated peak ACTH values occurred after 6 months (before: 59.8 +/- 15.4; 6th month: 112.0 +/- 11.2). GHRP-6-induced ACTH release also increased (before: 60.7 +/- 17.2; 6th month: 78.5 +/- 12.1), although not significantly. Conclusions The rise in basal ACTH levels during ketoconazole treatment in CD could be because of the activation of normal corticotrophs, which were earlier suppressed by hypercortisolism. The enhanced ACTH responses to ghrelin after ketoconazole in CD could also be due to activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and/or to an increase in GHS-receptors expression in the corticotroph adenoma, consequent to reductions in circulating glucocorticoids.

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) Objective: in Cushing's disease (CD), GH responsiveness to several stimuli, including ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH. is blunted. Recovery of GH secretion after remission of hypercortisolism after transsphenoidal surgery. radiotherapy or adrenalectomy is controversial. There are no studies evaluating the effect of primary clinical treatment with ketoconazole on GH secretion in CD. the aim of this study is to compare ghrelin-, GHRP-6-, and GHRH-induced GH release before and after ketoconazole in MDesign: GH responses to ghrelin. GHRP-6, and GHRH of eight untreated patients with CD (mean age: 33.8 +/- 3.1 years; body mass index: 28.5 +/- 0.8 kg/m(2)) were evaluated before and after 3 and 6 months of ketoconazole treatment. and compared with I I controls (32.1 +/-.2.5: 25.0 +/- 0.8).Methods: Serum GH was measured by an immunofluorometric assay and urinary free cortisol (UFC) by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry.Results: After ketoconazole use, mean UFC decreased significantly (before: 222.4 +/- 35.0 mu g/24 h: third month: 61.6 +/-+10.1: sixth month: 39.1 +/- 10.9). Ghrelin-induced GH secretion increased significantly after 6 months (peak before: 6.8 +/- 2.3 mu g/l: sixth month: 16.0 +/- 3.6). but remained lower than that of controls (54.1 +/- 11.2). GH release after GHRP-6 increased, although not significantly. while GH responsiveness to GHRH Was unchanged.Conclusions: Ghrelin-induced GH release increases significantly after 6 months of ketoconazole treatment in CD. This could suggest that, it decrease in cortisol levels during this time period can partially restore glucocorticoid-induced GH suppression in CD. GH-releasing mechanisms stimulated by ghrelin/GHS could be more sensitive, as no changes in GHRH-induced GH release were observed. Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Div Endocrinol, BR-04039002 São Paulo, Brazil Inst Fleury, BR-04344903 São Paulo, Brazil Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Div Endocrinol, BR-04039002 São Paulo, Brazil FAPESP: 02/14118-9 Web of Science

In thyrotoxicosis GH response to several stimuli is impaired, but there is no data on ghrelin-induced GH release in these patients. Ghrelin is a potent GH secretagogue and it also increases glucose levels in men. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ghrelin (1 microg/kg), GHRP-6 (1 mug/kg) and GHRH (100 microg), i.v., on GH levels in 10 hyperthyroid patients and in 8 controls. Glucose levels were also measured during ghrelin and GHRP-6 administration. In control subjects and hyperthyroid patients peak GH (microg/l; mean +/- SE) values after ghrelin injection (controls: 66.7 +/- 13.6; hyper: 19.3 +/- 2.4) were significantly higher than those obtained after GHRP-6 (controls: 26.7 +/- 5.1; hyper: 12.6 +/- 1.3) and GHRH (controls: 13.5 +/- 4.3; hyper: 5.3 +/- 1.3). There was a significant decrease in GH responsiveness to ghrelin, GHRP-6 and GHRH in the hyperthyroid group compared to controls. In control subjects and hyperthyroid patients basal glucose (mmol/l) values were 4.5 +/- 0.1 and 4.7 +/- 0.2, respectively. There was a significant increase in glucose levels 30 min after ghrelin injection (controls: 4.9 +/- 0.1; hyper: 5.2 +/- 0.2), which remained elevated up to 120 min. When the two groups were compared no differences in glucose values were observed. GHRP-6 administration was not able to increase glucose levels in both groups. Our data shows that GH release after ghrelin, GHRP-6 and GHRH administration is decreased in thyrotoxicosis. This suggests that thyroid hormone excess interferes with GH-releasing pathways activated by these peptides. Our results also suggest that ghrelin's ability to increase glucose levels is not altered in thyrotoxicosis.

In Cushing's disease (CD), adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH)/cortisol responses to growth hormone secretagogues (GHS), such as ghrelin and GHRP-6, are exaggerated. The effect of clinical treatment of hypercortisolism with ketoconazole on ACTH secretion in CD is controversial. There are no studies evaluating ACTH/cortisol responses to GHS after prolonged ketoconazole use in these patients.To compare ghrelin- and GHRP-6-induced ACTH/cortisol release before and after ketoconazole treatment in patients with CD.Eight untreated patients with CD (BMI: 28.5 +/- 0.8 kg/m(2)) were evaluated before and after 3 and 6 months of ketoconazole treatment and compared with 11 controls (BMI: 25.0 +/- 0.8).After ketoconazole use, mean urinary free cortisol values decreased significantly (before: 613.6 +/- 95.2 nmol/24 h; 3rd month: 170.0 +/- 27.9; 6th month: 107.9 +/- 30.1). The same was observed with basal serum cortisol (before: 612.5 +/- 69.0 nmol/l; 3rd month: 463.5 +/- 44.1; 6th month: 402.8 +/- 44.1) and ghrelin- and GHRP-6-stimulated peak cortisol levels (before: 1183.6 +/- 137.9 and 1045.7 +/- 132.4; 3rd month: 637.3 +/- 69.0 and 767.0 +/- 91.0; 6th month: 689.8 +/- 74.5 and 571.1 +/- 71.7 respectively). An increase in basal ACTH (before: 11.2 +/- 1.6 pmol/l; 6th month: 19.4 +/- 2.7) and in ghrelin-stimulated peak ACTH values occurred after 6 months (before: 59.8 +/- 15.4; 6th month: 112.0 +/- 11.2). GHRP-6-induced ACTH release also increased (before: 60.7 +/- 17.2; 6th month: 78.5 +/- 12.1), although not significantly.The rise in basal ACTH levels during ketoconazole treatment in CD could be because of the activation of normal corticotrophs, which were earlier suppressed by hypercortisolism. The enhanced ACTH responses to ghrelin after ketoconazole in CD could also be due to activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and/or to an increase in GHS-receptors expression in the corticotroph adenoma, consequent to reductions in circulating glucocorticoids.

Thyrotoxicosis might alter the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. We evaluated the effects of ghrelin and GHRP-6 on the HPA axis in 20 hyperthyroid patients and in 9 controls. Mean basal cortisol (microg/dl) and ACTH (pg/ml) levels were higher in hyperthyroidism (cortisol: 10.7 +/- 0.7; ACTH: 21.5 +/- 2.9) compared to controls (cortisol: 8.1 +/- 0.7; ACTH: 13.5 +/- 1.8). In thyrotoxicosis Delta AUC cortisol values (microg/dl.90 min) after ghrelin (484 +/- 80) and GHRP-6 (115 +/- 63) were similar to controls (ghrelin: 524 +/- 107; GHRP-6: 192 +/- 73). A significant increase in Delta AUC ACTH (pg/ml x 90 min) after ghrelin was observed in thyrotoxicosis (4,189 +/- 1,202) compared to controls (1,499 +/- 338). Delta AUC ACTH values after GHRP-6 were also higher, although not significantly (patients: 927 +/- 330; controls: 539 +/- 237). In summary, our results suggest that ghrelin-mediated pathways of ACTH release might be activated by thyroid hormone excess, but adrenocortical reserve is maintained.

A secreção do hormônio de crescimento (GH) é modulada pelo hormônio liberador de hormônio de crescimento (GHRH) e pela somatostatina. Na última década foi descoberto um terceiro mecanismo de controle, envolvendo os secretagogos de GH (GHS). A ghrelina, o ligante endógeno do receptor dos GHS, é um peptídeo acilado produzido no estômago, que também é sintetizado no hipotálamo. Este peptídeo é capaz de liberar GH, além de aumentar a ingesta alimentar. A ghrelina endógena parece amplificar o padrão básico de secreção de GH, ampliando a resposta do somatotrofo ao GHRH, estimulando múltiplas vias intracelulares interdependentes. Entretanto, seu local de atuação predominante é o hipotálamo. Neste trabalho, será apresentada revisão sobre a descoberta da ghrelina, os mecanismos de ação e o possível papel fisiológico dos GHS e da ghrelina na secreção de GH e, finalmente, as possíveis aplicações terapêuticas destes compostos. Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin modulate growth hormone (GH) secretion. A third mechanism was discovered in the last decade, involving the action of growth hormone secretagogues (GHS). Ghrelin, the endogenous ligand of the GHS-receptor, is an acylated peptide mainly produced by the stomach, but also synthesized in the hypothalamus. This compound increases both GH release and food intake. Endogenous ghrelin might amplify the basic pattern of GH secretion, optimizing somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH, activating multiple interdependent intracellular pathways. However, its main site of action is the hypothalamus. In the current paper it is reviewed the available data on the discovery of this peptide, the mechanisms of action and possible physiological roles of the GHS and ghrelin on GH secretion, and finally, the possible therapeutic applications of these compounds. Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de Medicina UNIFESP, EPM SciELO

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin modulate growth hormone (GH) secretion. A third mechanism was discovered in the last decade, involving the action of growth hormone secretagogues (GHS). Ghrelin, the endogenous ligand of the GHS-receptor, is an acylated peptide mainly produced by the stomach, but also synthesized in the hypothalamus. This compound increases both GH release and food intake. Endogenous ghrelin might amplify the basic pattern of GH secretion, optimizing somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH, activating multiple interdependent intracellular pathways. However, its main site of action is the hypothalamus. In the current paper it is reviewed the available data on the discovery of this peptide, the mechanisms of action and possible physiological roles of the GHS and ghrelin on GH secretion, and finally, the possible therapeutic applications of these compounds.

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) Na doença de Cushing (DC), as respostas do GH à ghrelina, ao GHRP-6 e ao GHRH estão diminuídas. Não existem dados sobre o efeito da redução dos níveis de cortisol, após cetoconazol, na secreção de GH na DC. Nessa situação, os níveis de ACTH são variáveis. Os objetivos do estudo são comparar as respostas do GH à administração de ghrelina, GHRP-6 e GHRH, e de ACTH e cortisol à ghrelina e ao GHRP-6 antes e após um mês de tratamento com cetoconazol em 6 pacientes com DC não tratados. Antes do tratamento, o pico de GH (mg/L; média ± EPM) após a administração de ghrelina, GHRP-6 e GHRH foi de 10,0 ± 4,5; 3,8 ± 1,6 e 0,6 ± 0,2, respectivamente. Após um mês de cetoconazol, ocorreu diminuição significante do cortisol urinário (redução média: 75%), mas as respostas de GH permaneceram inalteradas (7,0 ± 2,0; 3,1 ± 0,8; 0,9 ± 0,2, respectivamente). Após o tratamento, houve redução da resposta de cortisol (mg/dL) à ghrelina (antes: 30,6 ± 5,2; após: 24,2 ± 5,1), mas não ocorreram mudanças nas respostas de ACTH (pg/mL) (ghrelina antes: 210,9 ± 69,9; após: 159,7 ± 40,3; GHRP-6 antes: 199,8 ± 88,8; após: 227 ± 127,2). Assim, o tratamento a curto prazo com cetoconazol não modificou as respostas de GH ou ACTH, apesar da redução do cortisol. Para a recuperação da função hipofisária deve ser necessário um período de tratamento maior. GH responses to ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH in Cushing s disease (CD) are markedly blunted. There is no data about the effect of reduction of cortisol levels with steroidogenesis inhibitors, like ketoconazole, on GH secretion in CD. ACTH levels during ketoconazole treatment are controversial. The aims of this study were to compare the GH response to ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH, and the ACTH and cortisol responses to ghrelin and GHRP-6 before and after one month of ketoconazole treatment in 6 untreated patients with CD. Before treatment peak GH (mg/L; mean ± SEM) after ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH administration was 10.0 ± 4.5; 3.8 ± 1.6, and 0.6 ± 0.2, respectively. After one month of ketoconazole there was a significant decrease in urinary cortisol values (mean reduction: 75%), but GH responses did not change (7.0 ± 2.0; 3.1 ± 0.8; 0.9 ± 0.2, respectively). After treatment, there was a significant reduction in cortisol (mg/dL) responses to ghrelin (before: 30.6 ± 5.2; after: 24.2 ± 5.1). No significant changes in ACTH (pg/mL) responses before (ghrelin: 210.9 ± 69.9; GHRP-6: 199.8 ± 88.8) and after treatment (ghrelin: 159.7 ± 40.3; GHRP-6: 227 ± 127.2) were observed. In conclusion, after short-term ketoconazole treatment there are no changes in GH or ACTH responses, despite a major decrease of cortisol levels. A longer period of treatment might be necessary for the recovery of pituitary function. Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Division of Endocrinology UNIFESP, Division of Endocrinology SciELO

GH responsiveness to GH secretagogues (GHS) is blunted in Cushing's disease (CD), while ACTH/cortisol responses are enhanced, by mechanisms still unclear. Ghrelin, the endogenous ligand for GHS-receptors (GHS-R), increases GH, ACTH, cortisol and glucose levels in humans. This study evaluated the GH, ACTH, cortisol and glucose-releasing effects of ghrelin in CD in comparison with GHRP-6. GHRH-induced GH release was also studied. Ten patients with CD (BMI 26.9+/-1.0 kg/m(2)) and ten controls (BMI 24.4+/-1.1 kg/m(2)) received ghrelin (1 microg/kg), GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg) and GHRH (100 microg) separately. GH, ACTH, cortisol and glucose levels were measured. In CD ghrelin-induced GH (microg/L; mean +/- SE) release (peak: 7.2+/-3.0) was higher than seen with GHRP-6 (2.7+/-1.0) and GHRH (0.7+/-0.2), but lower than in controls (ghrelin: 58.3+/-12.1; GHRP-6: 22.9+/-4.8; GHRH: 11.3+/-3.7). In controls ACTH (pg/mL) release after ghrelin (79.2+/-26.8) was higher than after GHRP-6 (23.6+/-5.7). In CD these responses (ghrelin: 192+/-43; GHRP-6: 185+/-56) were similar, and enhanced compared to controls. The same was observed with cortisol. Glucose levels failed to increase after ghrelin in CD, differently than in controls. Our data suggests that hypothalamic and pituitary pathways of GH release activated by ghrelin, GHRP-6 and GHRH are deranged in chronic hypercortisolism. The increased ACTH/cortisol responses to ghrelin and GHRP-6 in CD could be mediated by overexpression of GHS-R in ACTH-secreting adenomas. Hypercortisolism apparently impairs the ability of ghrelin to increase glucose levels.