Search

Experiments in model organisms report abundant genetic interactions underlying biologically important traits, whereas quantitative genetics theory predicts, and data support, the notion that most genetic variance in populations is additive. Here we describe networks of capacitating genetic interactions that contribute to quantitative trait variation in a large yeast intercross population. The additive variance explained by individual loci in a network is highly dependent on the allele frequencies of the interacting loci. Modeling of phenotypes for multilocus genotype classes in the epistatic networks is often improved by accounting for the interactions. We discuss the implications of these results for attempts to dissect genetic architectures and to predict individual phenotypes and long-term responses to selection.

Real-world data on the management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are so far scarce in Germany. Therefore, we aimed to establish a nationwide registry and describe the clinical characteristics and therapy of PBC patients.Three different cohorts defined as ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) responders, as inadequate responders according to Paris II criteria, and as newly diagnosed patients were prospectively recruited.This manuscript includes the baseline data of the project.In total, 33/77 (43%) contacted centres (58% of university hospitals, 38% of non-university hospitals, and 24% of private practices) recruited 515 patients including 204 UDCA responders, 221 inadequate responders to UDCA, and 90 newly diagnosed patients.All patients were treated with UDCA; however, a UDCA dosage below the recommended dosage of 13 mg/kg/d was observed in 38.5% of individuals after 12 months of treatment. UDCA dosages were lower in nonacademic compared to academic centres.Only 75/219 (38.5%) of inadequate responders to UDCA received a second-line therapy with obeticholic acid (OCA) and/or bezafibrate (BZF). OCA (13% vs. 4.5%) and BZF (14% vs. 6.5%) were significantly more often prescribed by academic vs. nonacademic centres.Pruritus (27% vs. 15.5%), fatigue (23% vs. 4.5%), and sicca syndrome (14% vs. 1%) were significantly more often reported by academic centres.The German PBC registry could be established, which indicates suboptimal therapy in a relevant proportion of patients and shows significant differences between academic and nonacademic centres. Results are fundamental to improving clinical management at different levels of care., Competing Interests: JW: Lecturer and advisory board member for Intercept/Advanz Pharma, GSK, Ipsen TM: Ssupported by the German Research Foundation Grants MU 2864/1-3 and MU 2864/3- 1.KS: Receipt of speaker´s honoraria or advisory board: Gilead, Intercept/Advanz Pharma, Abbvie, Falk, Novo Nordisk HB: Consultant: Intercept/Advance Pharma, Ipsen GD: Consultant / speaker: AbbVie, Advanz/Intercept, Alexion, Falk Foundation, Gilead, Novartis, Orphalan, Univar PAR: Consulting and lectures fees: Astra Zeneca, BMS, Boston Scientific, CSL Behring, Gilead, Pfizer, Abbvie, Norgine JMS: Consultant: Astra Zeneca, Apollo Endosurgery, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Inventiva Pharma, Madrigal, MSD, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Siemens Healthineers. Research Funding: Gilead Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Siemens Healthcare GmbH. Stock Options: AGED diagnostics, Hepta Bio. Speaker Honorarium: Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, MedPublico GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Histoindex, MedPublico GmbH SZ: Speakers bureau and/or consultancy: Abbvie, BioMarin, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, GSK, Intercept, Ipsen, Janssen, Madrigal, MSD/Merck, NovoNordisk, SoBi, Theratechnologies KGS: Consultant: Advance Pharma, Speaker Honorarium: AbbVie, GileadJT has received speaking and/or consulting fees from Versantis, Gore, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Falk, Grifols, Genfit and CSL Behring. WPH: Consultant or Speaker Honorarium: Intercept /Advanz, Ipsen, NovoNordisk, Gilead, Abbvie, Norgine CS: Consultant, Study support or Speaker Honorarium: Calliditas, Falk, Intercept/Advanz, Ipsen, Mirum ER: Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees/advisory board: Abbvie, Amgen, Intercept, Medac, Merz, Norgine, Falk Foundation, Gilead, Pfizer, Repha, Takeda AEK: Research grant: Intercept. Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Advanz, AOP Orphan, Bayer, BMS, CMS, CymaBay, Falk, Gilead, GSK, Intercept, Ipsen, Newbridge, Novartis, Lilly, Mirum, MSD, Roche, Zambon. Consultant: Abbvie, Advanz, Alentis, AlphaSigma, AstraZenca, Avior, Bayer, BioNTech, CymaBay, Eisai, Escient, Falk, FMC, Gilead, GSK, Guidepoint, Intercept, Ipsen, Mirum, Medscape, MSD, Myr, Roche, Takeda, Viofor MR: Consultant, or Speaker Honorarium: Intercept/Advanz, Gilead, Abbvie AT: Speaker Honorarium: Intercept/Advanz VK: Consultant Astra Zeneca, Speaker’s Honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead, Falk, Mirum, Albireo/Ipsen, Merck, MedUpdate GmbH, Sanofi, CSL Behring ER: Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees/advisory board: Abbvie, Amgen, Intercept, Medac, Merz, Norgine, Falk Foundation, Gilead, Pfizer, Repha, Takeda FT: Research grant: Allergan, BMS, Inventiva, Gilead. Speakers bureau: Gilead, Abbvie, Falk, Merz, Orphalan, Advanz. Consultant: Allergan, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Abbvie, Alnylam, BMS, Intercept / Advanz, Inventiva, Pfizer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi. CT: Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees/advisory board: Intercept/Advanz Pharma TB: Receipt of grants/research supports: Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, MSD/Merck, Humedics, Intercept, Merz, Norgine, Novartis, Orphalan, Sequana Medical; Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees/advisory board: Abbvie, Alexion, Albireo, Bayer, Gilead, GSK, Eisai, Enyo Pharma, HepaRegeniX GmbH, Humedics, Intercept, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD/Merck, Novartis, Orphalan, Roche, Sequana Medical, SIRTEX, SOBI, and Shionogi; Participation in a company sponsored speaker’s bureau: Abbvie, Advance Pharma, Alexion, Albireo, Bayer, Gilead, Eisai, Falk Foundation, Intercept, Ipsen, Janssen, MedUpdate GmbH, MSD/Merck, Novartis, Orphalan, Sequana Medica, SIRTEX, and SOBI Nothing to disclose: AF, RG, UN, TB, AW, MH, RG, CB, TTW, RB, HG, ND, MM, PM, JUM, AK, KP, NKB, (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) are the standard and mostly lifelong treatment for chronic HBeAg-negative hepatitis B, as functional cure (loss of HBsAg) is rarely achieved. Discontinuation of NUC treatment may lead to functional cure; however, to date, the evidence for this has been based on small or non-randomized clinical trials. The STOP-NUC trial was designed with the aim of increasing the HBsAg loss rate using a NUC treatment interruption approach., Methods: In this multicenter, randomized-controlled trial, 166 HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B on continuous long-term NUC treatment, with HBV DNA <172 IU/ml (1,000 copies/ml) for ≥4 years, were randomized to either stop (Arm A) or continue NUC treatment (Arm B) for a 96-week observation period. In total, 158 patients were available for final analysis, 79 per arm. The primary endpoint was sustained HBsAg loss up to week 96., Results: Our study met its primary objective by demonstrating HBsAg loss in eight patients (10.1%, 95% CI 4.8%-19.5%) in Arm A and in no patient in Arm B (p = 0.006). Among patients with baseline HBsAg levels <1,000 IU/ml, seven (28%) achieved HBsAg loss. In Arm A, re-therapy was initiated in 11 (13.9%) patients, whereas 32 (40.5%) patients achieved sustained remission. A decrease of HBsAg >1 log IU/ml was observed in 16 patients (20.3%) in Arm A and in one patient (1.3%) in Arm B. No serious adverse events related to treatment cessation occurred., Conclusions: Cessation of NUC treatment was associated with a significantly higher rate of HBsAg loss than continued NUC treatment, which was largely restricted to patients with end of treatment HBsAg levels <1,000 IU/ml., Impact and Implications: As HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) rarely achieve functional cure, treatment is almost always lifelong. The STOP-NUC trial was conducted to investigate whether discontinuing long-term NUC treatment can increase the cure rate. We found that some patients achieved functional cure after stopping NUCs, which was especially pronounced in patients with HBsAg levels <1,000 at the end of NUC treatment, and that many did not need to resume therapy. The results of the Stop-NUC trial provide evidence for the concept of stopping NUC treatment as a therapeutic option that can induce functional cure., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This study uses social identity theory and communication accommodation theory as lenses to examine former cancer patients' perspectives of the "survivor" label, replacement labels for their experience, and use of survivor services. Semi-structured interviews of 43 former cancer patients offer insight into their unique cancer experiences and explain how these events influence their perceptions of the term survivor. Coders used constant comparison methods to capture six themes related to the participants' impressions of the survivor label. When sharing perceptions of the survivor label, participants expressed language that illustrated convergence ( It means everything to me) , divergence ( I don't like to be called anything) , convergence and divergence ( Part of me is happy … Part of me is kind of aggravated ), and apathy ( I have no feelings toward the label) . Participants also generated new labels that captured their cancer experiences and six unique themes emerged from these responses. Most of the former cancer patients were aware of survivorship programs; however, relatively few used these programs regularly and cited reasons for nonuse explained by social identity theory.

Using data from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (Deutsche Hepatitis C-Register, DHC-R), we report the real-world safety and effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) treatment and its impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in underserved populations who are not typically included in clinical trials, yet who will be crucial for achieving hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination. The DHC-R is an ongoing, non-interventional, multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study on patients treated for chronic HCV infection in Germany. The data cutoff was 17 January 2021. The primary effectiveness endpoint was sustained virologic response at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12). Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients receiving GLE/PIB. PROs were assessed using the SF-36 survey. Of 2354 patients, 1964 had valid SVR12 data (intention-to-treat analysis). Of these, 1905 (97.0%) achieved SVR12 with rates similar across the comorbidities analyzed, except for people who actively use drugs (PWUD (active)) (86.4%). Excluding those who discontinued treatment and did not achieve SVR12, or were reinfected with HCV, the rate was 99.3%, with similar results regardless of comorbidity. PWUD (active) and those with psychiatric disorders had the most meaningful improvements in PROs. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 631/2354 patients (26.8%), and serious AEs in 44 patients (1.9%). GLE/PIB was highly effective and well tolerated in this real-world study of patient groups key to HCV elimination.

Chronic hepatitis C can be treated very effectively with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) with only minor side effects compared to an interferon-containing treatment regimen. The significance of metabolic comorbidities after HCV cure is not well defined. This study aims to investigate short- and long-term weight change of patients receiving interferon-free antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C. The German Hepatitis C-registry (DHC-R) is a national multicenter real-world cohort. A total of 5111 patients were followed prospectively after DAA treatment for up to 3 years. Weight change compared to baseline was analyzed at end of treatment and at years 1, 2, and 3 after completion of antiviral therapy. Regression analysis was performed to identify baseline predictors for weight change. While there was no relevant mean weight change (-0.2 kg, SD 4.3 kg) at the end of antiviral treatment, weight started to increase during long-term follow-up reaching +1.7 kg (SD 8.0 kg, p < 0.001) compared to baseline at 3 years (follow-up year 3, FU3) after completion of antiviral therapy. 48%, 31%, and 22% of patients had a weight gain greater than 1, 3, and 5 kg at FU3, respectively. During follow-up, a body mass index (BMI) <30 proved to be the only consistent predictor for weight gain. DAA treatment is followed by a substantial weight gain (+3 kg or more) in one-third of the patients during long-term follow-up. Non-obese patients seemed to be most vulnerable to weight gain. The body compartment involved in weight gain as well as the mechanism of weight gain remain to be elucidated.

Background: For treatment of genotype 1a (GT1a) infection with elbasvir/grazoprevir, the German guidelines recommend a differentiated approach depending on baseline viral load (BVL). For low BVL ≤800 000 IU/mL, treatment with 12 weeks elbasvir/grazoprevir should be considered, whereas for high BVL >800 000 IU/mL, this regimen is only recommended in nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) absence. With present NS5A RAS or when RAS-testing is not available, 16 weeks elbasvir/grazoprevir + ribavirin is preferred. Here, we investigated the adherence to these recommendations and the effectiveness of elbasvir/grazoprevir in a large German Hepatitis C-Registry GT1a cohort., Methods: From September 2016 until July 2018, 195 GT1a-infected patients were treated with elbasvir/grazoprevir ± ribavirin for 12-16 weeks. The primary outcome was per protocol SVR12 or SVR24., Results: Mean age was 50 years, 89% were male, 19% had cirrhosis, 72% were treatment-naïve. Forty-five percent had low BVL ≤800 000 IU/mL, 55% high BVL >800 000 IU/mL, of whom 49 vs. 42% were baseline RAS-tested. Four patients with high (7.7%) and two with low BVL (5%) had NS5A RAS of whom 50% received elbasvir/grazoprevir+ribavirin, respectively. Ninety-four percent of patients with low and 65% with high BVL received elbasvir/grazoprevir without ribavirin. Thirty-five percent of patients with high BVL received ribavirin, mostly without prior RAS-testing. Per protocol sustained virologic response (SVR) by low vs. high BVL was 98.8 and 95.1%. All patients with NS5A RAS achieved SVR., Conclusions: In German, real-world most patients received elbasvir/grazoprevir without ribavirin. Ribavirin was mainly added in GT1a patients >800 000 IU/mL, who were not NS5A RAS tested. SVR rates were consistently high and comparable to clinical trial results., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background:  Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1 is the most common HCV GT in Western and Central Europe. The main focus of this present work is to analyze the change of baseline characteristics of 17 093 HCV-patients with genotype 1a/1b with antiviral therapy in Germany between 2004 and 2018. We analyzed five periods: (i) 2004-2007, (ii) 2008-2010, (iii) 2010-2013, (iv) 2014-2016, (v) 2017-2018., Methods:  The present analysis is based on five German non-interventional registry studies and comprises data on 17 093 HCV-GT1 patients documented between 2004 and 2018 [ML17071, ML19464, ML21645, ML25724 (Peginterferon alfa-2a ® non-interventional study [PAN]) and the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R)., Findings:  Overall, 7662 patients were infected with HCV GT1a and 9431 patients with HCV GT1b. GT1a patients were younger (46.5 years vs. 51.2 years) and more often male (70 % vs. 52 %). Previous or ongoing drug abuse was documented more frequently for GT1a patients throughout the study periods with highest frequencies in the most recent period (2017-2018; 44 % for GT1a and 10.3 % for GT1b). Metabolic comorbidities, such as those who are overweight and those with diabetes mellitus, were associated with HCV GT1b-infected women. The GT1a ratio increased from 33.6 % (2004-2007) to 50 % (2017-2018). A relevant change in the GT1a/1b ratio was observed over time in men (2004-2007: 38 %/63 %; 2017-2018: 59 %/41 %). In contrast, only 30 % of women had GT1a infection throughout all study periods without relevant changes. There were no regional differences within Germany in HCV GT1a/1b distribution despite a higher proportion of GT1b-infected women in East Germany in 2004-2007 (86 %)., Conclusion:  A marked increase of GT1a infection associated with drug use was observed in men, but not women, in Germany between 2004 and 2018. The present data show a fundamental change in HCV epidemiology, which has an impact on therapy management and general care of hepatitis C patients in Germany., Competing Interests: Karl-Georg Simon hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: AbbVie GmbH & Co.KG, Falk Pharma, Gilead Sciences GmbH, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH.Yvonne Serfert hat keine Interessenkonflikte.Peter Buggisch hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: AbbVie, Gilead, MSD.Stefan Mauss hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: AbbVie, Gilead, MSD.Klaus H. W. Boeker hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: AbbVie, Gilead.Hartwig Klinker hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, MSDTobias Müller hat keine Interessenkonflikte.Uta Merle hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: CSL-Behring, FALK.Dietrich Hüppe hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: AbbVie GmbH & Co. KG, Falk Pharma, Ferring Arzneimittel GmbH.Michael P. Manns hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Merck (MSD)Heiner Wedemeyer hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: Abbott, AbbVie, Altimmune, Biotest, BMS, BTG, Dicerna, Gilead, Janssen, Merck/MSD, MYR GmbH, Novartis, Roche, Siemens, Transgene., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Despite the high effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C, a small proportion of patients do not respond to approved regimens. The combination regimen of SOF/VEL/VOX was recently approved for patients with failure to prior NS5A-based treatment. In this German real-world cohort including patients with cirrhosis (27.3 %) and previous decompensation events, 12 weeks of SOF/VEL/VOX resulted in high virologic response rates irrespective of disease severity and prior DAA regimen. Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and comparable to those seen in the approval studies., Competing Interests: Johannes Vermehren: sponsored lectures (national oriInternational): AbbVie, Gilead, Intercept, Merck. Markus Cornberg: sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, Gilead, Merck/MSD, Siemens Healthcare, Falk Foundation e. V.; other: advisory committee or review panel: Merck/MSD, AbbVie, Spring. Albrecht Stoehr: grants: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, ViiV; sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, ViiV; other: advisory boards: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, ViiV. Hartwig Klinker: grants: Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, MSD; sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, MSD; other: advisory boards: AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Hexal, Janssen, MSD. Karl-Georg Simon: sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, FALK, Gilead, MSD; other: advisory committee or review panel: AbbVie, MSD. Gerlinde Teuber: sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, MSD; other: advisory committee or review panel: AbbVie, Gilead. Katja Deterding: sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, Gilead, Merck/MSD; other: advisory committee: Gilead, AbbVie. Julian Schulze zur Wiesch: sponsored lectures: Gilead, MSD, AbbVie. Maria-Christina Jung: nothing to disclose. Yvonne Serfert: nothing to disclose. Michael P. Manns: grants: AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Gilead, Merck (MSD); sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Gilead, Merck (MSD); consultant: AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Gilead, Merck (MSD). Stefan Zeuzem: consultancies and lecture honoria: AbbVie, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen, Merck/MSD. Heiner Wedemeyer: reports personal fees from Transgene, MSD, Roche, Gilead, Abbott, BMS, Falk, AbbVie, Novartis, GSK, Roche Diagnostics, Eiger, ITF, and MyrGmbH; grants/research support from MSD, Novartis, Gilead, Roche, Abbott, and Roche Diagnostics. Christoph Sarrazin: grants: Abbott, Gilead, Janssen, Qiagen, Roche, Siemens; sponsored lectures (national or international): Abbott, AbbVie, Achillion, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Merck/MSD, Qiagen, Roche, Siemens; other: advisory boards: Abbott, AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Merck/MSD, Roche., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Micro-elimination of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) includes treatment in populations at risk of ongoing HCV transmission, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) or people who inject drugs (PWID). We analyzed the HCV reinfection incidence rates of participants in the German hepatitis C cohort (GECCO) and compared our data to previous findings from the interferon era., Methods: Patients with HCV reinfections in the multi-centric GECCO cohort were compared to patients in whom no reinfection occurred. The HCV reinfection incidence rate in MSM was also compared to the incidence rate in the interferon era (using data from the European Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Treatment Network [NEAT])., Results: Between January 2014 and April 2018, 48 HCV reinfections occurred in 2298 individuals (2%), with 2346 cured HCV episodes. The median time to reinfection was 500 days (range 16-1160) and the overall HCV reinfection incidence rate was 1.89 per 100 person-years (py; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-2.48). In a multivariate analysis, the transmission risk in MSM was the only independent risk factor of HCV reinfection (odds ratio, 39.3; 95% CI, 4.57-334.40; P = .001). The incidence rate in MSM was 9.02 (95% CI, 6.48-12.26) per 100 py, compared to 1.14 per 100 py in PWID (95% CI, .56-2.09). The incidence rate for a first HCV reinfection in MSM was similar in the direct-acting antiviral era, compared to the interferon era, with a hazard ratio of 1.05 (95% CI, .64-1.74; P = .831)., Conclusions: HCV reinfection remains a frequent finding among MSM in Germany. In addition to behavioral interventions, early HCV treatment and retreatment should be implemented for this subgroup to prevent HCV transmission., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background:  Virologic failure to approved combinations of direct antiviral agents (DAA) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is rare. Mostly it involves difficult to treat patients with advanced liver disease and prior interferon-experience. Before approval of VOX/VEL/SOF, a restricted number of patients received rescue treatment, and the choice of DAA combinations for re-treatment were selected on an individual basis. In the present analysis, patient characteristics and rescue-regimens after virologic failure mainly based on first generation DAAs are described., Patients and Methods:  Data were obtained from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R), which is a national multicenter real-world cohort currently including about 16 500 patients recruited by more than 250 centers. The present analysis is based on 6683 patients who initiated a DAA therapy and for whom follow-up data (per-protocol analysis) were available., Results:  Among the patients, 188 (2.8 %) experienced a virologic relapse. Compared to SVR-patients, relapse patients were significantly more often male (77.7 % versus 56.9 %, respectively, p < 0.001), showed cirrhosis significantly more (48.4 % versus 28.1 %, respectively, p < 0.001) and a prior interferon-containing therapy (46.3 % versus 39.0 %, respectively, p = 0.049). The majority of patients who relapsed were infected with genotype 1 (47.4 %) followed by genotype 3 (29.8 %), and 95 relapse patients started DAA re-treatment. Characteristics of patients with rescue-treatment are similar to these of patients with relapse after initial DAA treatment. Thirty-one of 39 patients with complete follow-up data achieved SVR (79.5 %), and 8 patients had a relapse again (20.5 %). Patients who received rescue treatment including a new DAA class according to guidelines, except patients who received VOX/VEL/SOF, showed higher SVR rates than the entire group (21/25, 84 %). All patients who received VOX/VEL/SOF achieved SVR (n = 4, 100 %)., Conclusions:  Patients with failure with DAA combination therapies are a difficult but urgent to treat population with the frequent presence of cirrhosis and prior treatment failure with interferon-based therapies. Rescue therapy with inclusion of a new DAA class leads to high SVR rates, but multiple targeted therapy with VOX/VEL/SOF seems to be most effective., Competing Interests: Annika Schmitt: consulting: AbbVieRainer Günther: has nothing to discloseStefan Mauss: sponsored lectures (national or international): Gilead, AbbVie, MSD; advisory committee or review panel: Gilead, AbbVie, MSDKlaus H.W. Boeker: speaking and teaching: AbbVie, Gilead, MSDPeter Buggisch: advisory committee or review panel: AbbVie, Gilead, MSD, Intercept; speaking and teaching: AbbVie, Gilead, Falk, Merz, MSD, NorgineHeribert Hillenbrand: has nothing to discloseChristine John: has nothing to discloseHartwig Klinker: advisory committee or review panel: AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Hexal, Janssen, MSD, Shionogi; grant/research support: AbbVie, Arrowhead, BMS, Janssen, Gilead, MSD, Novartis; speaking and teaching: AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, MSDAnita Pathil: consultant: AbbVie; sponsored lectures (National or International): AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, JanssenKarl-Georg Simon: advisory committee or review panel: AbbVie, Gilead, MSD; speaking and teaching: AbbVie, FALK, Gilead, MSDYvonne Serfert: has nothing to discloseClaus Niederau: grants: AbbVie, Falk, Genzyme, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Shire; consultant: AbbVie, Alexion, Genzyme, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Shire; sponsored lectures: (National or International): AbbVie, Alexion, Biogen, BMS, Falk, Genzyme, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, ShireJohannes Vermehren: sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, Gilead, Intercept, Merck.Heiner Wedemeyer: personal fees from Transgene, MSD, Roche, Gilead, Abbott, BMS, Falk, AbbVie, Novartis, GSK, Roche Diagnostics, Eiger, ITF, and MyrGmbH; grants/research support from MSD, Novartis, Gilead, Roche, Abbott, and Roche Diagnostics.Christoph Sarrazin: speaker and consultation for AbbVie, Gilead, MSD/Merck, (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Goals and Background: International guidelines recommend prioritized treatment initiation in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with advanced liver disease. We aimed to evaluate whether the widespread usage of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) has led to a decrease in late presentation for care., Study: Data derived from the multicenter German Hepatitis C Cohort (GECCO) was analyzed. Treatment naive HCV-infected patients initiating DAA-based treatment between January 2014 and September 2017 were included. Advanced liver disease was defined by aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index score ≥1.5, METAVIR≥F3, or FibroScan ≥9.5 kPa. Period prevalence and risk factors for late presentation were evaluated., Results: Six hundred fifty-three HCV-monoinfected and 210 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients (mean age, 48.6±12.7 y; 65.5% male) were included. Overall 32.5% of patients had advanced liver disease. In 2014 39.4% of patients presented with advanced liver disease, decreasing to 30.1%, 34.4%, and 26.4% in the years 2015, 2016, and 2017 (P=0.057), respectively. Patients with and without advanced liver disease differed in age (P<0.0001), CD4 ≤350/µL (P=0.027), genotype (P=0.005), transmission route (P=0.047), body mass index (P<0.001), and time since diagnosis (P=0.007). In the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis GT3, age above 45 years and being diagnosed >2 years ago were positively and HCV transmission through men who have sex with men was negatively associated with advanced liver disease., Conclusions: Overall 32.5% of patients presented with advanced liver disease. We observed a trend toward a lower proportion of patients starting treatment late.GT3, age, years since HCV diagnosis and HCV transmission route were identified as risk factors for presentation with advanced liver disease.

Background:  The urgent need in HCV-infected patients with liver disease mandated the rapid implementation of IFN-free DAA combination therapies following their regulatory approval in 2014 and 2015 without full knowledge of the optimal combinations and regimens. Investigating the evolution of the DAA utilization patterns and treatment outcomes could provide learnings for future situations., Methods:  This was an analysis of a prospective observational database from the German Hepatitis C Registry (DHC-R) covering a period from May 2014 to September 2015. Adult patients had evidence of chronic HCV GT1 or GT4 infection and were treated with an IFN-free combination regimen of simeprevir (SMV) + sofosbuvir (SOF) or other IFN-free regimens: daclatasvir + sofosbuvir (DCV + SOF), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (SOF/LDV), paritaprevir/r + ombitasvir ± dasabuvir (PrOD), with or without ribavirine (R)., Results:  A total of 5496 subjects were followed during the period. During this period, clinical recommendations and treatment patterns evolved rapidly in response to new evidence from clinical trials and clinical routine and regulatory approval of additional regimens. High SVR12 rates were seen in this cohort, even in hard-to-treat patient subgroups. In the multivariate analysis, gender, age, advanced cirrhosis, and intensified treatment for cirrhotics were associated with treatment outcome., Conclusion:  Despite limited knowledge of the optimal utilization of the newly approved DAA combinations and treatment durations as well as their comparative efficacy and safety profiles, high SVR rates were achieved regardless of the DAA combination. These outcomes were facilitated by the rapid adaptation of clinical recommendations. Future situations with high unmet medical need may follow a similar approach., Competing Interests: CS has received speaker and consultancy fees from Abbvie, Abbott, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Merck and Siemens.PB has received speaker and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Falk, Gilead, Merz Pharma and MSD.SM has received speaker and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen and MSD.TM has received speaker and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Falk, Intercept, Gilead, MSD, Novartis and Roche.TZ has received speaker and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Astellas, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, and Roche.HK has received speaker and consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Hexal, Janssen and MSD.AP has received speaker and consultancy fees from Janssen, Gilead, AbbVie und BMS.MS is an employee of Janssen.CN is an employee of Janssen.ILD is an employee of Janssen.KGS has received speaker and consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Falk, Gilead, Norgine, Merz, MSD., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background and Aims:  Disease activity, but also demographics, lifestyle, and comorbidities, may influence alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) achieve virological cure in > 90 % of patients, regardless of HCV genotype and fibrosis stage. This allows assessing determinants for ALT levels before and after elimination of HCV., Methods:  Our prospective cohort included HCV- and HIV/HCV-infected patients treated with DAA at 9 German centers (GECCO cohort). We analyzed all consecutive patients with sustained virological response (SVR) at week 12 (SVR12) and/or 24. Normal ALT was defined as ≤ 35 U/L, regardless of sex., Results:  At baseline, 1477 out of 1774 patients (83 %) had ALT > 35 U/L, and 297 (17 %) had ALT ≤ 35 U/L. Baseline ALT > 35 U/L was independently associated with male sex, higher body mass index (BMI), liver cirrhosis, and not being on opioid substitution. After SVR, > 80 % of patients normalized ALT, and even patients with low baseline ALT further reduced ALT levels. However, ALT remained > 35 U/L in 15 % (221/1477) after SVR12. By multivariate analysis, ALT > 35 U/L at SVR12 was associated with male sex, higher BMI, liver cirrhosis, baseline ALT, HCV genotype 2, and younger age. Obesity, cirrhosis, and ALT were also independent factors associated with ALT > 15 U/L at SVR12 in patients with normal ALT at baseline., Conclusions:  Male sex, advanced liver fibrosis, and obesity are main risk factors for the lack of ALT normalization and/or ALT decline after SVR, indicative of fatty liver disease as a relevant comorbidity in hepatitis C., Competing Interests: Financial disclosures: Florian Berger: noneLukas Buendgens: noneChristoph Boesecke: Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, ViiV, Advisory board: Abbvie, Gilead, MSD, ViiVStefan Christensen: Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen; Advisory board: Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, ViiVDietrich Hüppe: Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, MSD; Advisory board: Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen.Patrick Ingiliz: Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, MSD.Thomas Lutz: noneStefan Mauss: Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen; Advisory board: Abbvie, Janssen, MSD.Knud Schewe: Fees for consultancy and speaking from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Gilead, Hexal, ViiV, Janssen, MSD.Karl Georg Simon: Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen; Advisory board: Abbvie, Janssen, MSD.Frank Tacke: Fees for consultancy and speaking from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, MSD. Financial support: none, (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Treatment decisions are based on extent of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection. Noninvasive diagnostic tools may help to avoid liver biopsy. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of noncommercial serum scores in comparison with transient elastography (TE). Data analysis was undertaken based on 2458 patients enrolled in the German Hepatitis C Registry, in a prospective, observational study. Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), FORNS index and FIB-4 score were calculated and the diagnostic accuracy was compared to TE. As estimated by TE, 955 (38.9%) patients had absence of significant fibrosis (SF), 736 (29.9%) patients had SF, and 767 (31.2%) patients were shown to have cirrhosis. Patients with absence of SF had a sustained virological response (SVR) rate of 97.9%, whereas SVR was attained in 96.2% and 92.2% in those with SF and cirrhosis, respectively (P < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity and specificity in discriminating of SF were 0.789, 0.596 and 0.939 by APRI; 0.838, 0.852 and 0.748 by FORNS index; and 0.828, 0.658 and 0.946 by FIB-4 score. AUROCs for the prediction of cirrhosis, sensitivity and specificity were 0.881, 0.851 and 0.854 by APRI; 0.846, 0.948 and 0.628 by FORNS index; and 0.907, 0.907 and 0.848 by FIB-4 score. In conclusion, in the present multicentre real-world cohort, SF and cirrhosis were predicted with high accuracy with noncommercial serum markers using TE as reference. Further prospective long-term follow-up is necessary to compare biomarkers with TE concerning liver-related outcome and overall mortality., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background:  More than 250 000 patients suffer from chronic hepatitis C in Germany. Several potent, direct-acting antiviral drugs have been approved since 2014. The aim of the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R) is to describe the epidemiology and patient care of hepatitis C and to investigate the efficacy and safety of new treatment options in real-world settings., Methods:  The DHC-R is a prospective multicenter non-interventional registry study that includes 327 centers throughout Germany. All approved treatment options have been documented. The current analysis differentiated 4 phases: 2/2014 - 12/2014, 1/2015 - 12/2015, 1/2016 - 7/2017 and 8/2017 - 7/2018., Findings:  Between February 2014 and July 2018, 12 170 patients were included in the registry (61.3 % male), and antiviral treatment was initiated in 11 268. The mean age declined from 52.3 years (phase 1) to 49.3 years (phase 4), while the proportion of patients with previous or ongoing drug abuse increased (26.3 % to 43.1 %). In 2014, 35.1 % of treated patients had liver cirrhosis, which declined to 16.5 % in phase 4. The HCV genotype distribution showed marked fluctuations, with most recent increases in HCV genotype 3 (30 % in phase 4). Per-protocol sustained virological response rates increased from 92.8 % in 2014 to 94.4 % in 2017/18 with excellent tolerability., Summary:  The DHC-R mirrors patient care of chronic hepatitis in the real-world setting in Germany and provides insights into epidemiology developments. It also confirms the high efficacy and safety of novel treatment options., Competing Interests: Dr. Dietrich Hüppe hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: MSD Sharp&Dohme GmbH, Janssen Cilag GmbH, Roche Pharma AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH&Co. KGaA, Falk Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Novartis Pharma Germany GmbH, Norgine GmbH, AbbVie GmbH & Co. KG, Gilead Sciences GmbH, Ferring Arzneimittel GmbH, (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: With the aging of the hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patient cohort and the availability of highly effective and tolerable treatment regimens, an increasing number of elderly patients are now eligible for HCV therapy. This study investigated clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of elderly HCV-infected patients as well as the effectiveness and safety of available therapies., Methods: Patients were enrolled into the German Hepatitis C Registry (DHC-R), a prospective, multicenter, real-world cohort study. Patients were treated at the discretion of the physician, and data were collected by a web-based system., Results: Of 7133 patients who initiated treatment, 686 (9.6%) were > 70 years of age. In patients > 70 years, intent-to-treat (ITT) SVR12 was 92.6% (514/555) compared to 90.7% (4521/4985) in patients ≤ 70 years of age. Overall, adverse events (AEs) were reported in 374 (54.5%) and 3435 patients (53.3%) > 70 or ≤ 70 years of age; 7.6% (52) and 3.6% (235) in the respective age groups had a serious AE. Twenty-two (3.2%) and 62 (1.0%) of the patients > 70 or ≤ 70 years discontinued treatment due to AEs. Death was reported in 34 patients, of whom eight were > 70 years of age. Frequent comorbidities in patients > 70 years of age were cardiac disease, renal disease and diabetes. Psychiatric disorders, substance abuse and viral co-infection were more frequent in younger patients., Conclusion: Direct-acting antiviral therapies were well tolerated in patients older than 70 years. SVR12 rates in the elderly patient group were similar to those observed in younger patients. Differences in the prevalence of comorbidities between age groups warrant individualized attention with respect to drug-drug interactions and therapy adherence. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00009717.

Background: Twelve weeks of the pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral (DAA) combination sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) was highly efficient in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 (GT3) infection in the ASTRAL-3 approval study. However, presence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) in the HCV nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) was associated with lower treatment response., Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of SOF/VEL ± ribavirin (RBV) and the impact of NS5A RASs and RBV use on treatment outcome in HCV GT3 infection in a real-world setting., Methods: In this multicentre cohort study, GT3 patients from ten treatment centres across Germany were included. Sustained virological response was assessed 12 weeks after end-of-treatment (SVR12) in modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol analysis (PP). NS5A RASs were tested by population-based sequencing., Results: A total of 293 GT3 patients were included. The median age was 48 years, 70% were male, 25.3% were cirrhotic, 9.2% were HCV/HIV co-infected and 21.8% were treatment-experienced, including 4.1% with DAA experience. Baseline NS5A RASs (Y93H, A30K, L31M) were detected in 11.2%. RBV was added in 5% of noncirrhotic and 58.9% of cirrhotic patients, respectively. SVR12 rates for SOF/VEL±RBV were 95.9% (mITT) and 99.5% (PP), respectively. Only 1 virological relapse occurred in a cirrhotic patient previously treated with SOF/RBV. No treatment-related major adverse events occurred., Conclusion: Twelve weeks of SOL/VEL±RBV was safe and highly efficient in HCV GT3 across a diverse patient population. Baseline NS5A RASs were rarely observed and presence did not seem to impact SVR, regardless of the use of RBV., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for 8 to 24 weeks is approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV). In the ION-3 study, 8 weeks of LDV/SOF was non-inferior to 12 weeks in previously untreated genotype 1 (GT1) patients without cirrhosis. According to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), 8-week treatment may be considered in naïve non-cirrhotic GT1-patients. However, there are only limited data on the effectiveness of an 8-week regimen of LDV/SOF under real-world conditions. The aim of the present study was to characterise patients receiving 8 weeks of LDV/SOF compared to those receiving 12 weeks of LDV/SOF, and to describe therapeutic outcomes in routine clinical practice., Methods: The German Hepatitis C-Registry is a large national real-world cohort that analyses effectiveness and safety of antiviral therapies in chronic HCV. This data set is based on 2,404 patients. Treatment with SOF/LDV (without RBV) for 8 or 12 weeks was initiated on or before September 30, 2015., Results: Overall, 84.6% (2,034/2,404) of the safety population (intention-to-treat-1 [ITT1]) and 98.2% (2,029/2,066) of the per protocol (PP) population achieved sustained virological response at week 12 (SVR12). In the 8-week group, 85.1% (824/968) of ITT1 and 98.3% (821/835) of PP patients achieved SVR12, while in the 12-week group, 85.5% (1,210/1,415) of ITT1, and 98.1% (1,208/1,231) of PP patients achieved SVR12. When treated according to the SmPC, 98.7% (739/749) of the patients achieved SVR12 (PP). Relapse was observed in 9.5% (2/21) of cirrhotic patients treated for 8 weeks (PP)., Conclusions: Under real-world conditions a high proportion of eligible patients receiving 8-week LDV/SOF treatment achieved SVR12. Relapse occurred more frequently in patients who did not meet the selection criteria according to the SmPC., Lay Summary: In a large real-world cohort of patients mainly treated by physicians in private practice in Germany, shorter HCV treatment (8-week) resulted in equivalent cure rates to 12-week treatment in genotype 1 HCV-infected patients. Thus, shorter treatment can be recommended in these patients which would substantially reduce costs of therapy. Clinical Trial number: DRKS00009717 (German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS)., (Copyright © 2017 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)