Search

Background: Adding immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy might improve outcomes for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We aimed to compare carboplatin and paclitaxel versus avelumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment with avelumab given concurrent to chemotherapy and as maintenance after the end of chemotherapy. Methods: MITO END-3 is an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial conducted at 31 cancer institutes, hospitals, and universities in Italy. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed advanced (FIGO stage III–IV) or recurrent endometrial cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–1, and no previous systemic anticancer therapy as primary treatment for advanced or metastatic disease. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computerised minimisation procedure stratified by centre, histology, and stage at study entry, to either receive carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5 mg/mL × min) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2; standard group) intravenously every 3 weeks for six to eight cycles or avelumab (10 mg/kg intravenously) added to carboplatin and paclitaxel (experimental group) every 3 weeks and then every 2 weeks as a single maintenance treatment after the end of chemotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients, treating clinicians, and those assessing radiological examinations were not masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, measured in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis. Experimental group superiority was tested with 80% power and one-tailed α 0·20. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03503786) and EudraCT (2016–004403–31). Findings: From April 9, 2018, to May 13, 2021, 166 women were assessed for eligibility and 39 were excluded. 125 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin and paclitaxel (n=62) or avelumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (n=63) and included in the ITT population. The median follow-up was 23·3 months (IQR 13·2–29·6) and was similar between the two groups. 91 progression-free survival events were reported, with 49 events in 62 patients in the standard group and 42 events in 63 patients in the experimental group. The median progression-free survival was 9·9 months (95% CI 6·7–12·1) in the standard group and 9·6 months (7·2–17·7) in the experimental group (HR of progression or death 0·78 [60% CI 0·65–0·93]; one-tailed p=0·085). Serious adverse events were reported more frequently in the experimental group (24 vs seven events in the standard group); neutrophil count decrease was the most frequent grade 3–4 adverse event (19 [31%] of 61 patients in the experimental group vs 26 [43%] of 61 patients in the standard group). Two deaths occurred in the experimental group during treatment (one respiratory failure following severe myositis [possibly related to treatment] and one cardiac arrest [not related to treatment]). Interpretation: Adding avelumab to first-line chemotherapy deserves further testing in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, although consideration of mismatch repair status is warranted.

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) is one of the main mediators of angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, it has been described an autocrine feed-forward loop in NSCLC cells in which tumor-derived VEGFA promoted the secretion of VEGFA itself, amplifying the proangiogenic signal. In order to investigate the role of VEGFA in lung cancer progression, we assessed the effects of recombinant VEGFA on proliferation, migration, and secretion of other angiogenic factors in A549, H1975, and HCC827 NSCLC cell lines. We found that VEGFA did not affect NSCLC cell proliferation and migration. On the other hand, we demonstrated that VEGFA not only produced a strong and persistent increase of VEGFA itself but also significantly induced the secretion of a variety of angiogenic factors, including follistatin (FST), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), angiopoietin-2 (ANGPT2), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), interleukin (IL)-8, leptin (LEP), platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1), and platelet-derived growth factor bb (PDGF-BB). PI3K/AKT, RAS/ERK, and STAT3 signalling pathways were found to mediate the effects of VEGFA in NSCLC cell lines. We also observed that VEGFA regulation mainly occurred at post-transcriptional level and that NSCLC cells expressed different isoforms of VEGFA. Collectively, our data suggested that VEGFA contributes to lung cancer progression by inducing a network of angiogenic factors, which might offer potential for therapeutic intervention.

Although evidence suggests that the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway plays an important role in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), resistance to MEK inhibitors has been observed in TNBC cells. Different mechanisms have been hypothesized to be involved in this phenomenon, including receptor tyrosine kinase-dependent activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. In this study, we analyzed the effects of the MEK1/2 inhibitor selumetinib in combination with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in a panel of TNBC cell lines that showed different levels of sensitivity to single-agent selumetinib: SUM-149 and MDA-MB-231 cells resulted to be sensitive, whereas SUM-159, MDA-MB-468 and HCC70 cells were relatively resistant to the drug. Treatment of TNBC cells with selumetinib produced an increase of the phosphorylation of the EGFR both in selumetinib-sensitive SUM-149, MDA-MB-231 and in selumetinib-resistant MDA-MB-468 TNBC cells. The combination of selumetinib and gefitinib resulted in a synergistic growth inhibitory effect in all the TNBC cell lines, although the IC50 was not reached in SUM-159 and MDA-MB-468 cells. This effect was associated with an almost complete suppression of ERK1/2 activation and a reduction of selumetinib-induced AKT phosphorylation. In addition, in selumetinib-sensitive TNBC cells the combination of selumetinib and gefitinib induced a significant G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Taken together, our data demonstrated that blockade of the EGFR might efficiently increase the antitumor activity of selumetinib in a subgroup of TNBC and that this phenomenon might be related to the effects of such combination on both ERK1/2 and AKT activation.

The VEGF A /VEGF receptor (VEGFR) network actively contributes to breast cancer pathogenesis and progression, playing a pivotal role in promoting tumour-associated angiogenesis. Vandetanib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively blocks VEGFR-2, the EGFR and RET tyrosine kinases. The drug has shown promising anti-tumour activity in preclinical models of breast cancer.The authors summarise the data on pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, preclinical and clinical studies of vandetanib up to April 2014, using: the PubMed and the clinicaltrials.gov databases; the FDA and EMA websites and the ASCO proceedings.Vandetanib has demonstrated a modest efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In this respect, the increased number of angiogenic pathways activated during tumour progression might partially explain the intrinsic and acquired resistance to the drug in advanced breast cancer. The activity of vandetanib in early phases of the disease, and in combination with other anti-angiogenic factors or metronomic therapy, should be explored in order to improve the clinical efficacy of the drug. Finally, the identification of predictive markers might help to select patients who are more likely to respond to anti-angiogenic drugs.

Objectives Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been hypothesized to be a prognostic factor in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and different cutoffs have been proposed to identify patients at high risk. We assessed the prognostic value of CTCs in patients with extensive SCLC. Materials and methods CTCs were assessed with the CellSearch system in 60 extensive SCLC patients. CTC count at baseline or after one cycle of chemotherapy (cycle-1) or as change after chemotherapy were analyzed separately. Primary outcome was overall survival. The accuracy of prognostic role was assessed by Harrell's c-index. “Optimal” cutoffs were derived by bootstrap resampling to reduce the overfitting bias; accuracy improvement was estimated by calculating the difference of c-indexes of models including clinical variables with or without CTCs. Results CTCs were identified in 90% (54/60) of patients at baseline, in which CTC count ranged from 0 to 24,281. CTC count was strongly associated with the number of organs involved. The prognostic accuracy was only marginally increased by the addition to clinical information of “optimal” CTC cutoffs at baseline and after cycle-1. Conversely, a reduction of CTC count higher than 89% following chemotherapy significantly improved prognostic accuracy (bootstrap p -value = 0.009) and was associated with a lower risk of death (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09–0.61). When previously proposed cutoffs were applied to our cohort, they showed only marginal improvement of the prognostic accuracy. Conclusion CTCs have useful prognostic role in extensive SCLC, but only the change of CTC count after the first cycle of chemotherapy provides clinically relevant information. Previously reported CTC cutoffs were not prognostic in our cohort of patients.

Although evidence suggests that the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway plays an important role in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), resistance to MEK inhibitors has been observed in TNBC cells. Different mechanisms have been hypothesized to be involved in this phenomenon, including receptor tyrosine kinase-dependent activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. In this study, we analyzed the effects of the MEK1/2 inhibitor selumetinib in combination with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in a panel of TNBC cell lines that showed different levels of sensitivity to single-agent selumetinib: SUM-149 and MDA-MB-231 cells resulted to be sensitive, whereas SUM-159, MDA-MB-468 and HCC70 cells were relatively resistant to the drug. Treatment of TNBC cells with selumetinib produced an increase of the phosphorylation of the EGFR both in selumetinib-sensitive SUM-149, MDA-MB-231 and in selumetinib-resistant MDA-MB-468 TNBC cells. The combination of selumetinib and gefitinib resulted in a synergistic growth inhibitory effect in all the TNBC cell lines, although the IC50 was not reached in SUM-159 and MDA-MB-468 cells. This effect was associated with an almost complete suppression of ERK1/2 activation and a reduction of selumetinib-induced AKT phosphorylation. In addition, in selumetinib-sensitive TNBC cells the combination of selumetinib and gefitinib induced a significant G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Taken together, our data demonstrated that blockade of the EGFR might efficiently increase the antitumor activity of selumetinib in a subgroup of TNBC and that this phenomenon might be related to the effects of such combination on both ERK1/2 and AKT activation.

Aim: We assessed the ability of the Therascreen® kit (plasma-Therascreen) and of a peptide nucleic acids (PNA)-clamp approach to detect EGFR mutations in plasma-derived circulating-free tumor DNA (cftDNA) from non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Materials & methods: cftDNA from 96 patients was analyzed for exon 19 deletions and the p.L858R mutation, using both plasma-Therascreen and PNA-clamp-based assays. Results: None of the 70 EGFR wild-type patients showed EGFR mutations in cftDNA with both techniques (specificity: 100%). In 17/26 EGFR-mutant patients, plasma-Therascreen analysis confirmed the mutation identified in the primary tumor (analytical sensitivity: 65.4%). Similar results were obtained with the PNA-clamp method. Conclusion: Both approaches were specific and sensitive for EGFR mutational analysis of cftDNA in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

A 71-year-old patient with a pulmonary lesion was diagnosed with a low-grade neuroendocrine tumor following examination of a fine needle aspiration biopsy. Analysis of a peripheral blood sample with the CellSearch system revealed the presence of putative circulating tumor cells (CTC) that were positive for EpCAM and cytokeratin (CK) expression. Since EpCAM is not usually expressed in neuroendocrine tumors, we performed a biopsy of liver metastases. Morphological and immunophenotypical characterization revealed that the patient had an EpCAM and CK positive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). By using the CellSearch apparatus, EpCAM/CK positive CTC were detected in peripheral blood samples from 3 out of 4 additional SCLC patients. This study is the first to demonstrate that CTC can be identified in SCLC patients by using the CellSearch system.

On November 2010, a 41-year-old man, a former light smoker, was admitted to our institution for a right lung nod-ule with pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and renal and hepatic failure. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 4. PET scan demonstrated tracer accumulation in the right lung, pleural, supraclavicular and mediastinic lymph nodes, bone and liver (Fig. 1