Search

OBJECTIVES Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the major cause of cryoglobulinemia. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have markedly changed the therapeutic outcomes in the treatment of patients with HCV. We evaluate the efficacy, safety, immunological, and clinical response of different DAA regimens in HCV-cryoglobulinemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ninety-three cryoglobulinemic patients, divided into symptomatic [symptomatic cryoglobulinemic patients (SCP; n=35)] and asymptomatic [nonsymptomatic cryoglobulinemic patients (NSCP; n=60)], underwent DAAs. Eighty-nine comparable noncryoglobulinemic patients were selected as a control group. We evaluated the sustained virological response (SVR), the adverse effects, and the immune and symptomatic response. RESULTS Percentages of patients who achieved SVR and experienced adverse effects were not statistically different between the three groups (100, 95, 93.3% and 57.1, 53.3, 48.3%). In 68.5% of SCP and in 76.7% of NSCP, cryoglobulins disappeared at SVR. No risk factor was associated with the persistence of cryoglobulins. An increase was observed both in C4 (P=0.002; P=0.018) and in C3 (P=0.0037; P=0.031) in SCP and NSCP. About 70% of symptomatic patients showed a complete or partial symptomatic remission: persistence of symptoms is correlated to the type of clinical picture. CONCLUSION DAA regimens are safe and effective in patients with HCV-cryoglobulinemia. The achievement of SVR is necessary, but not sufficient, to achieve a complete immunological and clinical response.

Background & Aims: In the direct-acting antiviral era, treatment of genotype-3 HCV (HCV-GT3) is still challenging. Real-life comparisons between recommended regimens, sofosbuvir (SOF)+daclatasvir (DAC), SOF/velpatasvir (VEL), glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), are scarce. We aimed at filling this data gap. Methods: Sustained virological response 12weeks after treatment completion (SVR12) was assessed for all HCV-GT3 patients consecutively treated within the Lombardia web-based Navigatore HCV-Network; differences in SVR12 across regimens were evaluated by logistic regression. Results: Of the 2082 subjects with HCV-GT3, 1544 were evaluable for comparisons between regimens: SOF+DAC (1023, 66.2%), SOF/VEL (369, 23.9%), GLE/PIB (152, 9.8%). Patients treated with former regimens were more frequently male, cirrhotic, HIV-positive, pretreated, used ribavirin in their regimen, and had lower baseline HCV-RNA. SVR12 was similar across groups: 94.8% in SOF+DAC, 97.6% in SOF/VEL, 96.7% in GLE/PIB (P=.065). At univariate analysis, SVR12 was associated with female gender (97.9% vs 94.8%, P=.007) and lower median pretreatment Log10HCV-RNA (5.87 vs 6.20, P=.001). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, treatment with SOF/VEL was associated with a higher likelihood of SVR12 than SOF+DAC, but only in the absence of ribavirin (98% vs 90.3%). Female gender and lower pretreatment HCV-RNA were independently associated with SVR12. Conclusions: In a large real-life setting of HCV-GT3-infected patients with a high proportion of cirrhosis, the success rate was remarkable. The slight advantage of SOF/VEL on SOF+DAC was significant only without ribavirin. The current prescription shift towards novel regimens (ie SOF/VEL and GLE/PIB) in easier-to-treat patients allows ribavirin-free and shorter schedules without mining SVR12 in this <> genotype.

Background & Aims Sofosbuvir/velpatasivr/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) is approved for retreatment of patients with HCV and a previous failure on direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), however real-life data are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL/VOX in a real-life setting. Methods All consecutive patients with HCV receiving SOF/VEL/VOX between May-October 2018 in 27 centers in Northern Italy were enrolled. Bridging fibrosis (F3) and cirrhosis (F4) were diagnosed by liver stiffness measurement: >10 and >13 kPa respectively. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA 4 (SVR4) or 12 (SVR12) weeks after the end-of-treatment. Results A total of 179 patients were included: median age 57 (18–88) years, 74% males, median HCV-RNA 1,081,817 (482–25,590,000) IU/ml. Fibrosis stage was F0-F2 in 32%, F3 in 21%, F4 in 44%. HCV genotype was 1 in 58% (1b 33%, 1a 24%, 1nc 1%), 2 in 10%, 3 in 23% and 4 in 9%; 82% of patients carried resistance-associated substitutions in the NS3, NS5A or NS5B regions. Patients received SOF/VEL/VOX for 12 weeks, ribavirin was added in 22% of treatment schedules. Undetectable HCV-RNA was achieved by 74% of patients at week 4 and by 99% at week 12. Overall, 162/179 (91%) patients by intention to treat analysis and 162/169 (96%) by per protocol analysis achieved SVR12, respectively; treatment failures included 6 relapsers and 1 virological non-responder. Cirrhosis (p = 0.005) and hepatocellular carcinoma (p = 0.02) were the only predictors of treatment failure. Most frequent adverse events included fatigue (6%), hyperbilirubinemia (6%) and anemia (4%). Conclusions SOF/VEL/VOX is an effective and safe retreatment for patients with HCV who have failed on a previous DAA course in a real-life setting. Lay summary This is the largest European real-life study evaluating effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) in a large cohort of consecutive patients with hepatitis C virus infection and a prior direct-acting antiviral failure, who were treated within the NAVIGATORE Lombardia and Veneto Networks, in Italy. This study demonstrated excellent effectiveness (98% and 96% sustained virological response rates at week 4 and 12, respectively) and an optimal safety profile of SOF/VEL/VOX. Cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma onset were the only features associated with treatment failure.

Chronic hepatitis C is one of the most important causes of liver disease, leading to cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently some important advances in therapy have been achieved with the introduction of first wave, first generation direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) such as boceprevir (BOC), in combination with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV). The superior rate of sustained virological response with this treatment is accompanied by an elevated frequency of anaemia. Several studies have evidenced the importance of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in inosine triphosphatase (ITPA) and solute carrier family 29, member 1 (SLC29A1) genes in the development of this adverse event. Here, we investigated haemoglobin levels and the best-known functional SNPs in ITPA and SLC29A1 genes in 22 patients treated with triple therapy with BOC/Peg-IFN/RBV. The identification of ITPA protective and SLC29A1 risk genotypes still appears to be a current methodology in RBV dosing during hepatitis C virus therapy with DAAs.

Previous article in issueNext article in issue Introduction: There is a limited documentation about the retreatment of patients failing a recommended NS5A-containing regimen in Italy. Materials & methods: Within the VIRONET-C network, 386 NS5A-failing patients infected with different HCV-genotypes (GT) (GT1a/1b/2a-c/3a-b-g-h/4a-d-n-o-v=93/124/19/112/38) were analyzed. Retreatment of 105 failures was investigated. HCV-resistance-test was performed by Sanger-sequencing. Results: Failures following seven different NS5A-containing regimens were studied: 3D/2D (paritaprevir/ombitasvir ± dasabuvir) ± ribavirin (N = 72/4), daclatasvir/ledipasvir/velpatasvir + sofosbuvir ± ribavirin (N = 105/131/20), grazoprevir/elbasvir ± ribavirin (N = 34), glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (N = 20). Notably, 18.1% of NS5A-failing patients did not show any resistance-associated-substitutions (RAS), while 81.9% showed at least one NS5A-RAS, with multiclass-resistance in 35.5%. NS5A-RAS were observed more frequently in glecaprevir/pibrentasvir failures (GT1a 83.3%: Y93H + Q30H/D or +H58D; GT3a: 83.3% Y93H + A30K/G or +L31I) compared to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (GT1a 16.6%: Y93H + Q30H, p = 0.08; GT3a 20.0%: Y93H/N + A30K/T, p = 0.03). To date, 105 failures have started a retreatment: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir ± ribavirin (N = 30), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir ± ribavirin (N = 67), glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (N = 4), grazoprevir/elbasvir ± sofosbuvir + ribavirin (N = 3), 3D + sofosbuvir + ribavirin (N = 1). The majority of patients were cirrhotic (51.9%) and relapsers (87.5%). The prevalence of NS5A-RASs before retreatment was 80.9%, with multiclass-resistance 29.5%. Among patients completing post-retreatment follow-up, a sustained-viral-response at week 12 (SVR12) was observed in 26/33 (78.8%). SVR4 was documented in 49/56 (87.5%). SVR12 was 76.0% with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir ± ribavirin (N = 25). Differently, SVR12 was 100% with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8/12/16 weeks (N = 3), grazoprevir/elbasvir ± sofosbuvir + ribavirin for 12/24 weeks (N = 3) or 3D + sofosbuvir + ribavirin for 24 weeks (N = 1), despite the presence of NS5A-RASs. Until now, 67 patients started sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir ± ribavirin recommended-retreatment for 12 weeks. 54/67 (80.6%) showed at least one baseline NS5A-RAS, 23/67 (34.3%) multiple-NS5A-RASs, and 22/67 (32.8%) multiclass-resistance. Of 25 patients with available outcome, 96.0% had SVR4. Only 1 GT1b infected patient was non-responder, without RASs before retreatment. Conclusions: In this real-life setting, NS5A-RASs were frequently detected at failure, and multiclass-resistance was around 30%. Overall, SVR after resistance-test-guided retreatment was >95%, with the exception of the sofosbuvir/velpatasvir retreatment. Our results show how HCV resistance-test at failure may be useful to optimize retreatment strategies.

In poorly adherent HIV-infected subjects strategic approaches may avoid resistance to long-acting compounds. This study means to assess the safety of a strategy which was being carried out in our Division in several nonadherent subjects with general satisfaction. All subjects who had been switched to boosted protease inhibitors plus maraviroc for treatment failure between June 2014, and April 2015, were retrospectively evaluated. Eighteen were taking darunavir/ritonavir and 26 atazanavir/ritonavir plus maraviroc 300 mg once daily. All had a follow-up of 104 weeks and 27 exceeded 156 weeks. One patient, who was INSTI-experienced and still had >500 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 60, switched to dolutegravir plus darunavir/ritonavir and rapidly failed, selecting for INSTI cross resistance-associated mutations (97A, 140S and 148H). At week 96 and 140, 81.8% and 85.2% had

Introduzione L’introduzione dei nuovi farmaci antivirali (DAAs) nell’armamentario terapeutico ha rappresentato una svolta epocale nel campo dell’infezione da HCV, e cio ha forse un significato ancora maggiore nei pazienti affetti da concomitante infezione da HIV, i quali presentano una piu rapida progressione della malattia epatica e che, a fronte della stabilizzazione della malattia da HIV con le terapie antiretrovirali croniche (HAART), hanno visto la loro prognosi a lungo termine inficiata dalla concomitante infezione con HCV (1,2). L’efficacia dei DAAs si esprime non solo negli evidenti e altissimi tassi virologici di risposta (sustained virological response, SVR), ma anche nell’ottenimento della stessa persino in casi in cui HCV-RNA al termine del trattamento e ancora rilevabile, come nei due casi che qui descriviamo.

The potential drug-to-drug interaction between darunavir and raltegravir in the setting of HIV infection is a highly debated issue still unresolved. In the present study we have evaluated the pharmacokinetics of darunavir and ritonavir in 53 HIV-1 infected patients with or without concomitant raltegravir administration. The assessment of trough plasma drug concentrations was carried out in all subjects and the potential influence of raltegravir on darunavir and ritonavir disposition, assessed by specific pharmacokinetic evaluations in a subgroup of 25 patients. No significant differences on darunavir and ritonavir plasma trough levels were observed between patients receiving or not raltegravir. Co-administration of raltegravir was, however, associated with a 40% reduction in darunavir C max and estimated AUC 0–24 , as well a 60% increase in the estimated darunavir clearance compared with values measured in patients not given raltegravir. Notably, this interaction was independent of the dosage of darunavir and not due to effects of raltegravir on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir. These results should be taken into account when darunavir-based regimens are implemented in the setting of HIV, especially considering that this drug is usually administered at fixed daily dose and no therapeutic drug monitoring is performed in most centres.

Chronic hepatitis C is one of the most important causes of liver disease, leading to cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently some important advances in therapy have been achieved with the introduction of first wave, first generation direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) such as boceprevir (BOC), in combination with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV). The superior rate of sustained virological response with this treatment is accompanied by an elevated frequency of anaemia. Several studies have evidenced the importance of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in inosine triphosphatase (ITPA) and solute carrier family 29, member 1 (SLC29A1) genes in the development of this adverse event. Here, we investigated haemoglobin levels and the best-known functional SNPs in ITPA and SLC29A1 genes in 22 patients treated with triple therapy with BOC/Peg-IFN/RBV. The identification of ITPA protective and SLC29A1 risk genotypes still appears to be a current methodology in RBV dosing during hepatitis C virus therapy with DAAs.

Objectives: To evaluate the risk factors for lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-related liver enzyme elevation (LEE) in HIV antiretroviral-experienced patients. Methods: An open prospective observational study was carried out to analyse the incidence and time of LEE development during LPV/r treatment, and to determine whether LEE development was correlated with epidemiological, clinical and biochemical data, immune and virological profiles, concomitant hepatic diseases, antiretroviral therapy, or histological and ultrasonography liver examination results. A diagnosis of LEE was considered when LEE symptoms occurred after LPV/r introduction and was confirmed by a second control within 2 weeks. Results: A total of 782 HIV-positive outpatients have been enrolled in six different Infectious Diseases Departments in Northern Italy since August 2000. Of these patients, 71 (9.1%) developed LEE within 115 +/- 85 days (mean +/- standard deviation); 13 of these subjects discontinued LPV/r and four were hospitalized. Of the patients with LEE, 74.6% and 25.4% had grade 2 and greater than or equal to3 toxicity, respectively. No correlation between LEE and sex, baseline CD4 cell count, viral load, HIV stage, triglyceride values, histological and ultrasonography liver examination results, nevirapine use, or increase in CD4 cell count was observed. Higher baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) values (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.004, respectively), younger age (P = 0.008), previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (P = 0.012), efavirenz use (P = 0.04), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or HBV coinfection (P < 0.0001, relative risk 4.78) were significantly related to LEE. No correlations between LEE and the same risk factors as investigated in the whole study population were found in subgroups of patients with HCV and/or HBV infection. Conclusions: HCV and HBV testing and measurement of baseline ALT values are essential for screening subjects at risk of LEE before starting LPV/r. Strict monitoring of clinical and biochemical parameters should be performed in these patients.

Triple therapy with telaprevir/boceprevir + pegylated-interferon+ribavirin can achieve excellent antiviral efficacy, but it can be burdened with resistance development at failure.To evaluate kinetics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA decay and early resistance development, in order to promptly identify patients at highest risk of failure to first generation protease inhibitors.HCV-RNA was prospectively quantified in 158 patients receiving pegylated-interferon+ribavirin+telaprevir (N = 114) or+boceprevir (N = 44), at early time-points and during per protocol follow-up. Drug resistance was contextually evaluated by population sequencing.HCV-RNA at week-2 was significantly higher in patients experiencing virological failure to triple-therapy than in patients with sustained viral response (2.3 [1.9-2.8] versus 1.2 [0.3-1.7]log IU/mL, p0.001). A 100 IU/mL cut-off value for week-2 HCV-RNA had the highest sensitivity (86%) in predicting virological success. Indeed, 23/23 (100%) patients with undetectable HCV-RNA reached success, versus 26/34 (76.5%) patients with HCV-RNA100 IU/mL, and only 11/31 (35.5%) with HCV-RNA100 IU/mL (p0.001). Furthermore, differently from failing patients, none of the patient with undetectable HCV-RNA at week-2 had baseline/early resistance.With triple therapy based on first generation protease inhibitors, suboptimal HCV-RNA decay at week-2 combined with early detection of resistance can help identifying patients with higher risk of virological failure, thus requiring a closer monitoring during therapy.

Introduction Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) is a relatively well tolerated antiretroviral drug. However, side effects including hyperbilirubinemia, dyslipidemia, nephrolithiasis and cholelithiasis have been reported in the medium and long term. Unboosted ATV may be selected for some patients because it has fewer gastrointestinal adverse effects, less hyperbilirubinemia and less impact on lipid profiles. Methods We investigated the distribution of ATV plasma trough concentrations according to drug dosage and the potential relationship between ATV plasma trough concentrations and drug-related adverse events in a consecutive series of 240 HIV-infected patients treated with ATV/r 300/100 mg (68%) or ATV 400 mg (32%). Results 43.9% of patients treated with ATV/r 300/100 mg had ATV concentrations exceeding the upper therapeutic threshold. A significant and direct association has been observed between the severity of hyperbilirubinemia and ATV plasma trough concentrations (ATV concentrations: 271 [77–555], 548 [206–902], 793 [440–1164], 768 [494–1527] and 1491 [1122–1798] ng/mL in patients with grade 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hyperbilirubinemia, respectively). In an exploratory analysis we found that patients with dyslipidemia or nephrolitiasis had ATV concentrations significantly higher (582 [266–1148], and 1098 [631–1238] ng/mL, respectively) (p

BACKGROUND The pharmacokinetics of raltegravir (RAL) in HIV patients is characterized by high interindividual and intraindividual variability. We documented previously that HIV patients taking RAL at 400 mg bid by chewing the tablets had significantly higher drug absorption and reduced pharmacokinetic variability than patients taking the drug by swallowing the tablets. This study extends our previous findings. METHODS An open-label, 2-period crossover study compared the pharmacokinetics of 2 doses of RAL given at 400 mg every 12 hours (that mimics a bid administration) by swallowing with 1 dose of 800 mg (that mimics a qd administration) by chewing the tablets in 12 healthy volunteers. RAL plasma concentrations were measured by a chromatographic method coupled with mass spectrometry. RESULTS Subjects taking RAL by chewing had significantly higher drug exposure (RAL area under the curve[AUC](0-24): 40722 ± 14843 versus 21753 ± 12229 ng · h/mL, P < 0.0001) and reduced pharmacokinetic variability compared with those taking the drug by swallowing the whole tablet, with no difference in the minimum RAL concentrations (RAL C(min): 36 ± 23 versus 43 ± 23 ng/mL, P = 0.298). Subjects taking RAL by chewing the tablets had significantly higher drug absorption and reduced pharmacokinetic variability compared with those taking the drug by swallowing. No differences were observed in the minimum RAL concentrations. CONCLUSIONS RAL at 800 mg once daily by chewing the tablets may represent a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of HIV being associated with higher drug absorption, reduced pharmacokinetic variability, and potentially better compliance compared with patients swallowing the 400-mg bid intact tablets.

Apart from the BENCHMRK study, there are no large observational experiences describing the long-term efficacy and safety of rescue regimens for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Antiretroviral-experienced patients with detectable viraemia starting a raltegravir (RAL)-based regimen between March 2007 and June 2009 were consecutively enrolled and followed for ≥4 years. Data were censored at Week 206 for homogeneity. Of 333 patients, 258 (77.5%) were still on RAL-based therapy at Week 206, and 241 had undetectable HIV-1 RNA (73% in intention-to-treat analysis). Of the 75 subjects who discontinued RAL therapy, 36 were lost to follow-up, 15 changed their regimen due to virological failure, 2 simplified their regimen stopping RAL, 9 stopped all antiretrovirals and 13 died. Overall, 100 subjects (30.0%) had at least one detectable viraemia, but only 32 (9.6%) had true viral failure. Seventeen patients continued their failing regimen. 'Blips' were experienced by 53 patients (15.9%), whilst 15 (4.5%) had confirmed viral rebound due to adherence issues and were re-suppressed upon treatment re-introduction. In a multivariate analysis of predictors of interruption or failure, each baseline HIV-1 RNA log10 increase was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio for failure of 1.6; having more than 13 previous treatment courses also emerged as a predictor. Overall, adverse events were rare (n=64), with 13 deaths. Tumours were mainly early events, often fatal (7/15), mainly non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (8), followed by hepatocarcinoma (2). RAL proved effective and well tolerated in this cohort, and few patients experienced viral failure after 4 years.

In view of the forthcoming long-acting antiretrovirals, measures should be taken to prevent the selection of HIV drug resistance mutations. All subjects who had been switched to boosted protease inhibitors plus maraviroc (bPIs/MVC) with baseline HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mL between June, 2014, and April, 2015, were retrospectively evaluated. HIV-1 RNA, CD4+ T-cells, serum glucose, creatinine, ALT, and adverse events were controlled every 3 to 4 months. We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients: 18 were taking darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) and 26 atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) once daily, plus MVC 300 mg once daily. Seven subjects were in CDC stage C. All had a follow-up of at least 24 weeks, 28 exceeded 48 weeks, and 21 exceeded 72 weeks. All had experienced at least 1 viral failure and had selected at least 1 resistance-associated mutation (RAM). At baseline, 38 had plasma HIV-1 RNA 50-499 copies/mL and 6 had ≥500. At week 24, none had viremia >500 and 30 (68.2%) had suppressed HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL. Of the subgroup with 48 weeks' follow-up, 23 had HIV-1 RNA 50-499 copies/mL, 5 had ≥500, and 20/28 suppressed to

A patient classified as HCV-1a-positive by both LiPA Siemens 2.0 and Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II was instead found to be infected with HCV-1g, as determined by phylogenetic analysis of NS3 sequences. HCV-1g NS3 sequences available to date naturally harbour the resistance substitution T54S, plus P131S and L135F changes, located in the highly conserved NS3 positions within the boceprevir-binding site, as determined by structural modelling. HCV-1g NS3 sequences show some similarities to HCV-4 and are poorly responsive to interferon/ribavirin and to boceprevir/telaprevir; this patient was also a null-responder to boceprevir treatment. Baseline genotypic resistance testing may provide crucial information for the management of first-generation protease-inhibitor-based regimens, including both HCV genotype/subtype and natural resistance.

The pharmacokinetics of raltegravir (RAL) in HIV patients is characterized by high interpatient/intrapatient variability. We investigated the potential contribution of the drug pharmaceutical formulation to RAL pharmacokinetics. We first compared in vivo the pharmacokinetics of RAL for 67 patients to whom the drug was administered by swallowing the intact tablet with those obtained from 13 HIV-infected patients who chewed the RAL tablet due to swallowing difficulties. Subsequently, we evaluated in vitro the dissolution of RAL tablets under different conditions. In the in vivo study, we found that patients given RAL by chewing the tablets presented pharmacokinetic profiles characterized by significantly higher RAL absorption than did patients receiving the drug by swallowing. The in vitro studies showed that when the whole tablets were exposed to an acidic medium, the release of RAL was very low, whereas when the tablets were crushed, the profiles presented significantly higher concentrations of RAL. Crushed tablets tested in water or in a pH 6.8 buffer exhibited prompt and complete dissolution of RAL. HIV-infected patients receiving RAL by chewing the tablet showed higher drug absorption and reduced pharmacokinetic variability compared with patients swallowing the intact tablet. This is related to problems in tablet disintegration and to erratic drug absorption. The amelioration of the RAL pharmaceutical formulation could improve drug pharmacokinetics.

In the past few years, some cases of vascular pathology in HIV-positive patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) have been reported. We describe a case of severe and premature vascular disease, occurring in a young female patient, multiexperienced for HAART, who is part of a cohort of patients followed for drug-induced toxicity. After 6 years of treatment she suffered a bilateral carotid stenosis; the only risk factors were cigarette smoking and hypercholesterolemia.

Objectives Limited studies in healthy volunteers and in HIV-1-infected patients have shown that raltegravir pharmacokinetics are characterized by high inter-patient variability. Only scanty data are, however, available on intra-patient raltegravir variability. The present study was designed to evaluate in parallel the inter- and intra-patient variability of raltegravir pharmacokinetics in HIV-1-infected patients during routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Methods Fifteen HIV-infected patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy containing 400 mg of raltegravir twice daily were included in the study. Pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed during two consecutive visits. Only patients given raltegravir for at least 1 month and with no changes in antiretroviral and concomitant therapy between the two pharmacokinetic evaluations were considered. Raltegravir plasma concentrations were determined by a validated HPLC method. Blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after the morning drug dose. Raltegravir AUC(0-12) was estimated using a recently developed algorithm. Results The pharmacokinetic evaluation was repeated after an average of 52 ± 68 days. Raltegravir AUC(0-12) values ranged from 1495 to 49 051 ng · h/mL. The main finding was that intra-patient variability was a large component of the overall variability in raltegravir pharmacokinetics. In some instances the difference between raltegravir AUC(0-4) and AUC(0-12) measured in the same patient during two consecutive evaluations exceeded 110% and 75%, respectively. Conclusions The pharmacokinetics of raltegravir in HIV-1-infected subjects are characterized not only by inter-patient variability but also by high intra-patient variability. This condition limits the application of TDM for raltegravir, and might potentially affect patient outcome.

Stepwise multiple regression analyses were applied to 50 raltegravir pharmacokinetic profiles from 50 HIV patients with the goal to identify limited sampling strategies for the prediction of drug area under the time-concentration curve (AUC(0-12)). Raltegravir single sampling point-based equations failed to reliably predict daily drug exposure. Conversely, different algorithms based on few samples and associated with good correlation, acceptable bias, and imprecision with the measured raltegravir AUC(0-12) were identified. These models could used to predict raltegravir exposure for clinic or research purposes.

Raltegravir is the first integrase inhibitor to get into the clinic and the MK-0518 Expanded Access Program (EAP) started in Italy in 2007, so that most patients now have an observation period of two years. Up to date a few studies have described the durability of raltegravir-containing regimen with a follow up of 96 weeks. Supplement: Abstracts of the Tenth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1758-2652-13-S4-info.pdf Conference: Tenth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection 7-11 November 2010 Glasgow, UK (Published: 8 November 2010) doi:10.1186/1758-2652-13-S4-P38 Cite this article as: Landonio et al.: Long-term follow-up of HIV-infected patients in salvage therapy with raltegravir plus optimized background regimens: a multicentre Italian experience. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2010 13(Suppl 4):P38. Full text: PubMed Central: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3113040/

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and incidence of nephrotoxicity in HIV-infected patients enrolled in the SCOLTA Project tenofovir cohort and to identify possible risk factors. Design: The SCOLTA Project is a prospective, observational, multicenter study involving 25 infectious disease departments in Italy created to assess the incidence of severe adverse events in patients receiving new antiretroviral drugs. Patients: The SCOLTA Project tenofovir cohort includes a total of 754 HIV infected patients. Results: Data including grade II-IV creatinine elevations according to ACTG scale were available in 354 patients, 237 (67%) males with a mean age of 40.1 ± 7.6 years enrolled in the SCOLTA Project tenofovir cohort. During a mean follow up of 19.5 ± 11.5 months creatinine elevations were reported in 9/354 (2.5%) patients, all males. Mean duration of tenofovir therapy at the event was 9.5 ± 5 months. The overall incidence was 1.6 (95% CI 1.5-1.7) per 100 person-years (p-y) and 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.6) p-y for grade III. No grade IV creatinine elevations were reported. Patients with nephrotoxicity were older and more frequently male, HCV infected, in CDC stage C and their CD4 cell count was significantly lower than those without nephrotoxicity. No significant difference was found between tenofovir co-administered antiretroviral drugs. Conclusions: Both prevalence and incidence of nephrotoxicity were low in patients receiving tenofovir in a non-selected clinical setting. Renal injury in patients receiving tenofovir seems associated with the presence of co-morbidities and with advanced HIV infection. © 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Background The availability of several therapeutic regimens has transformed HIV infection from a life-threatening disease into a chronic condition. Older patients (>50 years old) with HIV infection constitute a new treatment challenge in terms of the cumulative effects of ageing and antiretroviral therapy (ART). Methods The immunovirological effects and metabolic interactions of 48 weeks of ART in older patients followed up in three Infectious Diseases Units in Milan, Italy since 1994 were compared with those in younger controls aged 25–35 years. Results The 159 older patients and 118 controls enrolled in the study were comparable for HIV stage, baseline CD4 cell count and viral load but differed for mode of HIV transmission, comorbid conditions and related chronic treatments. Mean viral load decreased after 48 weeks of treatment by 2.6 log10 HIV RNA copies/mL and CD4 count increased by 137.5 cells/μL in older patients, and similar values for immunovirological effects were obtained in the young controls. The relative risk (RR) of an abnormal test in older patients was 7.33 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.36–12.36] for glucose, 1.73 (95% CI 1.45–2.07) for total cholesterol, 1.56 (95% CI 1.22–2.0) for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 1.26 (95% CI 1.02–1.56) for triglycerides, 6.48 (95% CI 4.36–9.66) for serum creatinine, and 0.45 (95% CI 0.35–0.58) for ALT. Moderate/severe liver and renal toxicities were recorded in the older patients but not in the controls. The tolerability of ART did not differ between the older patients and the controls. Thirty-nine new cardiovascular, endocrine-metabolic and neuralgic disorders (24.52 per 100 person-years) were diagnosed in the older patients and four (3.39 per 100 person-years) in the controls (P

We studied 382 multiexperienced HIV-infected patients followed up for > or =3 months after starting lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) to identify the factors predicting hypertriglyceridemia and high non-HDL cholesterol levels (triglycerides > or =200 mg/dl and/or non-HDL cholesterol > or =190 mg/dl) after 6 and 12 months of LPV/r exposure. The predictors of hypertriglyceridemia were higher baseline triglyceride levels [OR: 2.28 (95% CI: 1.67-3.12) for each additional 100 mg/dl; p = 0.001], the total duration of antiretroviral treatment [OR: 1.26 (95% CI: 1.12-1.41) for each additional year; p = 0.01], CDC stage C (OR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.24-3.88; p = 0.02), and male gender (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.42-4.74; p = 0.02); intravenous drug abusers seem less likely to develop the event (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.37-0.92; p = 0.03). The predictors of high non-HDL cholesterol levels were higher baseline levels [OR: 3.92 (95% CI: 1.92-6.24) for each additional 100 mg/dl; p = 0.001) and the combination of NRTIs and NNRTIs with LPV/r (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.10-3.69; p = 0.03). The 75 patients stopping LPV/r showed a significant reduction in median triglyceride and non-HDL cholesterol levels after 3 months of 39 mg/dl and 20 mg/dl (p = 0.01 for both), respectively. Patients with high triglyceride and non- HDL cholesterol levels at the start of LPV/r treatment are at higher risk of developing hyperlipidemia.