Search

Transseptal puncture is a fundamental learning step for a young electrophysiologist. New technologies have been developed to reduce the complexity of the procedure and improve safety. One of them is AcQCross™️Qx. Our aim is to discuss our procedural approach with this new technology, during cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation.

Background Several studies have evaluated the role of QRS duration (QRSd) or QRS narrowing as predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in order to reduce non-responders. However, their results have been conflicting. In our study we analyzed retrospectively a cohort of patients from three centers to better correlate the association between the relative change in QRS narrowing index (QI) and clinical outcome and prognosis in patients who underwent CRT implantation. Methods We included 398 patients in whom a CRT device was implanted in accordance with current guidelines in our three centres. Baseline clinical variables, echocardiographic parameters and pharmacological therapies were included. QRS duration before and after CRT implantation and QI [(pre implant QRS duration - QRS duration during CRT)/pre implant QRS duration × 100] were measured. Results Respect to echocardiographic follow up at 6 months, a significant improvement in all parameters (EF, LVEDV, LVESV) was observed. In 68% of patients, LVESV decreased by 10% or more. QI was significantly related to reverse remodelling (r = + 0.22; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.32, p = 0.001). The cut-off value of QI that predicted best LV reverse remodelling after 6 months of CRT was 12.25% (sensitivity 65,49%, specificity 75%, area under the curve 0.7, p = 0.001). Regarding clinical outcomes at 12 mounths, a statistically significant difference was found between patients with a QI ≤ 12.25%, and those with a QI > 12.25%, in terms of NYHA class worsening (p 0,04). Another statistically significant difference was found analyzing the relation between QI and the causes of deaths, the mean of the QI of patients who died from cardiovascular causes was lower than patients who died of other causes. (p 0,0179). Conclusions Therefore decrease in QRSd after CRT initiation was related to greater echocardiographic reverse remodelling and better outcome from death or cardiovascular hospitalization. Even if larger studies are needed, QI seems to be an easy-to- measure variable that could be used or evaluated to predict CRT response.

Aims Anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease represents a clinical dilemma. We sought to evaluate the efficacy/safety of different anticoagulation, i.e. vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in such patient group. Methods and results This was a pooled-analysis enrolling up-to-date clinical data. Two subsets: subset A (VKA vs. Non-Anticoagulation) and subset B (NOACs vs. VKA) were pre-specified. The study outcomes were ischaemic stroke (IS)/thromboembolism (TE), major bleeding (MB), intracranial bleeding (ICB), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and all-cause mortality. A total of 20 042 patients’ data were analysed (subset A: N = 10 275, subset B: N = 9767). Overall mean age: 71 ± 11 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score: 4.0 ± 1.8, mean HAS-BLED score: 3.6 ± 1.2. The majority of the patients had Child-Pugh category (A-B). As compared with Non-Anticoagulation, VKA seemed to reduce the risk of IS/TE [odds ratio (OR): 0.60, P = 0.05], but heighten the risk of all-bleeding events including MB (OR: 2.81, P = 0.01), ICB (OR: 1.60, P = 0.01), and GIB (OR: 3.32, P = 0.01). When compared with VKA, NOACs had similar efficacy in reducing the risk of IS/TE (OR: 0.82, P = 0.64), significantly lower risk of MB (OR: 0.54, P = 0.0003) and ICB (OR: 0.35, P Conclusions VKA appears to reduce the risk of IS/TE but increase all-bleeding events. NOACs have similar effect in reducing the risk of IS/TE and have significantly lower risk of MB and ICB as compared with VKA. NOACs seem to be associated with better clinical outcome than VKA in patients with mild–moderate liver disease.

We present a case of ventricular fibrillation triggered by a premature ventricular complex. During ablation from the left coronary cusp, the ablation catheter dislodged inside left main coronary artery, thus resulting in cardiac arrest. We immediately performed angioplasty and stent implantation, and the procedure was accomplished with a guiding catheter left inside the vessel. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.), Graphical abstract

Background High-power, short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates the procedure and improve effectiveness; however, esophageal injury remains a safety concern. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during high-power ablation for PVI in terms of endoscopic esophageal lesion. Methods Patients with symptomatic AF underwent ablation index–guided high-power (AI-HP) PVI (50 W; AI anterior wall/posterior wall: 550/400). In the first consecutive set of patients, an insulated esophageal temperature probe was used for LET monitoring (cutoff LET >39°C) (group A). In the second consecutive set of patients, the probe was not used (group B). All patients were scheduled to undergo esophageal endoscopy 1–3 days after ablation. Results A total of 120 patients (60 group A; 60 group B) were included in the study (mean age 67.8 years; 64% male). Baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Procedural PVI was achieved in all patients. First-pass PVI rate was 96.6%. Mean procedural radiofrequency (RF) time was 11.5 minutes, mean procedural time was 55.5 minutes, and fluoroscopic time was 5.6 minutes. Mean contact force at the LA posterior wall was 23 g, and mean RF ablation time at the LA posterior wall was 3.2 minutes. Two patients in group A and 1 patient in group B had endoscopic small esophageal lesions (P = .99). No serious procedural adverse events were observed. Conclusion Among patients undergoing AI-HP (50 W) PVI, the incidences of ablation-related endoscopic esophageal lesion in patients with and those without use of a temperature probe for LET monitoring (cutoff 39°C) were comparably low.

Maze‐like linear substrate modification in atrial fibrillation patients nonresponders to pulmonary vein isolation represents a feasible technique to gain left atrial appendage electrical isolation even in the presence of a Watchman occluder device.

Absorbable antibacterial envelopes (AAEs) are currently recommended in patients undergoing a transvenous ICD implantation in cases at high risk of infection, who are now preferably implanted with a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD). Nevertheless, experiences using a combined approach with S-ICD and AAE have not been reported. The aim of our study was to evaluate this strategy in patients at very high risk of infection.Twenty-five patients were implanted with the S-ICD+AAE using our combined approach, restricted to patients who would fit our decisional flow algorithm identifying very high-risk patients. Patients were followed up 1 month after discharge and every 6 months thereafter. Complications were defined as device-related events requiring medical or surgical intervention for resolution and/or device reprogramming.Twenty-five patients (92% males, mean age 58.5±14.1 years) were implanted with the S-ICD device and the AAE using our combined approach. The most common high-infective risk factors were diabetes requiring insulin treatment (80%) and CKD requiring hemodialysis (48%), with 7 (28%) patients presenting with more than 2 risk factors. A single mild early post-operative hematoma was observed that was managed conservatively with a spontaneous resolution. Despite a very high-risk cohort, only a single late pocket infection was detected and solved conservatively with antibiotic therapy.The preliminary data of this proof-of-concept study show how a combined deployment of AAE and S-ICD in selected patients at very high risk of infection is a safe and feasible technique and may offer a reliable treatment option in specific and selected clinical settings.

A 78 year-old patient with postischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and severely reduced ejection fraction was implanted with a Boston Scientific RESONATE X4 CRT-D and followed by LATITUDE remote monitoring platform. From the end of January to the end of March 2021 he was hospitalized for COVID19 pneumonia followed by two episodes of acute heart decompensation with bilateral pleural effusion. We remotely followed the patient and identified a typical Heart Logic sensor pattern linked to the COVID19 pneumonia, different from the one linked to the heart failure (HF). We eventually made a literature review on the topic.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has shown high morbidity and mortality and the relationship between pulmonary embolism (PE) and COVID-19 is well established in the literature.We describe the characteristics of a cohort of COVID-19 patients (EP-COV) hospitalized at our Centre with PE, investigating how COVID-19 may have influenced their outcomes, as compared to patients without COVID-19 hospitalized for PE in the same months of 2020 (EP-2020) and 2019 (EP-2019).EP-COV patients (n=25) were younger (60.5 ± 8.5 vs 71.4 ± 14.5 vs 70.9 ± 11.8 years, p=0.003), more frequently male (76% vs 48% vs 35%, p=0.016), with a lower history of neoplasia (12% vs 47% vs 40%, p=0.028) and more clinically severe (SOFA score 3.4 ± 1.4 vs 2.2 ± 1.4 vs 1 ± 1.1, p0.001 and PaO2/FiO2 ratio 223.8 ± 75.5 vs 306.5 ± 49.3 vs 311.8 ± 107.5) than EP-2020 (n=17) and EP-2019 patients (n=20). D-dimer and C-reactive protein were higher in EP-COV (p=0.038 e p0.001, respectively). The rate of concomitant deep vein thrombosis associated with PE did not differ significantly between the three groups. EP-COV patients developed PE more frequently during in-hospital stay than non-COVID-19 patients (p = 0.016). The mortality rate was higher in EP-COV than in EP-2020 and EP-2019 patients (36% vs 0% vs 5%, p=0.019).In our study, the risk factors for PE in COVID-19 patients seem to differ from the traditional risk factors for venous thromboembolism; EP-COV patients are clinically more severe and display a higher mortality rate than EP-2020 and EP-2019 patients.

BACKGROUND The endoscopic ablation system (EAS) is an established ablation device for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The novel X3 EAS is now equipped with a contiguous circumferential ablation mode (RAPID mode). AIM To determine the feasibility of single-shot fashioned ablation using X3. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation using X3 were enrolled. We assessed the acute procedural data focusing on "Single-sweep PVI" defined as successful PVI with a single RAPID mode energy application, and on "first-pass isolation" defined as successful PVI after initial circular lesion set. RESULTS One hundred AF patients (56% male, age: 68 ± 10 years, 66% paroxysmal AF) were analyzed. A total of 379 of 383 PVs (99%) were isolated with X3. Single-sweep PVI and first-pass-isolation were achieved in 214 PVs (56%) and in 362 PVs (95%), respectively. Single-sweep PVI rates varied across PVs with higher rates at the superior PVs (61.2% vs. inferior PVs: 49.5%, p = .0239) and at PVs with maximal ostial diameter 24 mm: 36.8%, p = .0151). The mean total procedure and fluoroscopy times were 43.0 ± 10 and 4.0 ± 2 min, respectively. In none of the patients an acute thromboembolic event (stroke or transient ischemic attack) or a pericardial effusion/tamponade occurred. A single transient phrenic nerve palsy was observed. CONCLUSION The new X3 EAS allows for single-shot fashioned ablation in terms of single-sweep PVI in half or more of PVs. The new RAPID ablation mode leads to an improved rate of first-pass isolation associated with very short procedure times without compromising safety.

Background: The endoscopic ablation system (EAS) is an established ablation device for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The novel X3 EAS is now equipped with a contiguous circumferential ablation mode (RAPID mode). Aim: To determine the feasibility of single-sweep ablation using X3. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation using X3 were enrolled. We assessed the acute procedural data focusing on “Single-sweep PVI” defined as PVI with a single energy application using RAPID mode to complete the circular lesion set, and on “first-pass isolation” defined as successful visually guided PVI after initial circular lesion set. Results: One-hundred AF patients (56% male, age 68±10 years, 66% paroxysmal AF) were analyzed. A total of 379 of 383 PVs (99%) were isolated with X3. Single-sweep isolation and first-pass-isolation were achieved in 214 PVs (56%) and in 362 PVs (95%), respectively. Single-sweep isolation rates varied across PVs with higher rates at the superior PVs (61.2% vs. inferior PVs:49.5%, P=0.0239) and at PVs with maximal ostial diameter 24mm: 36.8%, P=0.0151). The mean total procedure and fluoroscopy times were 43.0±10 and 4.0±2 mins, respectively. In none of the patients an acute thromboembolic event (stroke or transient ischemic attack) or a pericardial effusion/tamponade occurred. A single transient phrenic nerve palsy was observed. Conclusion: The new X3 EAS allows for single-sweep PVI in 56% of PVs. The new RAPID ablation mode leads to an improved rate of first-pass isolation associated with very short procedure times without compromising safety.

BACKGROUND Recently a double 120 s freeze cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) protocol proved to be non inferior to a double 240 s freeze protocol in terms of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences. We hypothesized that this approach could also result in an increased procedure safety. METHODS Eighty consecutive patients treated with a double 120 s freeze protocol (Group CB120) were compared with 80 previous consecutive patients treated with a single 240 s freeze protocol (Group CB240). Procedures were performed with a temperature probe to monitor the luminal esophageal temperature (LET), using a cut off for cryoenergy interruption of 15°C. During ablation at the septal pulmonary veins (PVs), the phrenic nerve (PN) function was monitored by pacing. RESULTS In CB120 and CB240 the rate of single shot isolation was similar in all PVs. Time to isolation was not different between the two groups. Mean minimal esophageal temperature was lower in LSPV and LIPV of the CB240 group. A total of 4/80 patients (5%) of the CB120 group experienced a PN injury, but no persistent form was recorded; 11/80 patients (14%) of the CB240 group experienced a PN injury, three in a persistent form (p = .10). A LET

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, procedural data, and lesion characteristics of anterior line (AL) and roof line (RL) ablation by using ablation index (AI) guided high-power(50W) among patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods 35 consecutive patients with macro-reentrant left atrial tachycardia (LAT) or substrate at LA anterior wall or roof after previous PVI were enrolled. Ablation power was set to 50W, targeting AI 500 for AL and 400 for RL. First-pass conduction block (FPB) was evaluated. The AL was arbitrarily divided into 3(caudal, middle and cranial) segments to analyze the location of conduction gaps in non-FPB patients. Results A total of 32 AL and 17 RL were deployed and FPB was achieved in 24 (75%) and 14 (82%) of them respectively. In non-FPB group, the most frequent gap location along the AL was the middle third. Final block of AL was achieved in 97%, and block of RL was achieved in 100%. The RF ablation time was short (2,9 ± 0,8 min for AL and 46,2 ± 15,6 sec for RL). For AL, female gender was significantly more frequent in FPB than in non-FPB patients(p 0,028); patients with non-FPB were associated with significantly longer RF time as compared to patients with FPB (204 ± 47 sec vs 161 ± 41 sec; p = 0,02). No procedural complications occurred. Conclusion AI guided high-power(50W) ablation appears to be a feasible, effective and fast technique for AL and RL ablation.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): CardioFocus Background The endoscopic ablation system (EAS) is an established ablation device for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). In randomized studies, however, point-by-point laser ablation resulted in longer procedure times. The novel X3 EAS is now equipped with a motor driven laser generator that sweeps the diode laser beam around the individual PV ostium at a pre-defined speed (2.25°/sec) thus allowing for contiguous circumferential ablation (RAPID mode). Purpose To determine the feasibility of single sweep ablation using the new X3 EAS. Methods Consecutive AF patients were enrolled. After single transseptal puncture selective PV angiographies were performed. A 3D enabled circular mapping catheter was used to record PV potentials and to create a 3D map of the left atrium. Then, the transseptal sheath was exchanged for the 12F EAS delivery sheath. The EAS was inflated to obtain optimal circumferential contact to the PV ostium. Before ablation, the laser generator was retracted to ensure optimal contact behind the catheter shaft (blind spot). Ideally, RAPID mode ablation was employed at 13-15W. In case of esophageal heating >39°C or suboptimal tissue exposure point-by-point ablation (5.5-12W for 20-30 secs) was used instead. During ablation at the septal PVs phrenic nerve pacing was performed via a diagnostic catheter in the superior vena cava. Single sweep ablation was defined as one single RAPID energy application per PV to complete the singular, circular lesion set. PV conduction was re-assessed after all PVs had been treated. In case of residual PV conduction, gap mapping followed by EAS guided ablation was performed. If EAS failed to achieve complete PVI, touch up ablation was allowed at the discretion of the operator. Hemostasis was achieved by means of a figure of 8 suture. Procedure time was defined as initial groin puncture to groin closure. Follow-up included office visits at 3, 6 and 12 months including 72 h Holter monitoring. Results One-hundred AF patients (56% male, mean age 6810 years, 66% PAF) with normal LV ejection fraction (mean 60 ± 10%) and normal LA size (41 ± 6mm) underwent X3 EAS ablation. Of 382 PVs 378 (99%) were isolated with the X3 EAS. In 214 PVs (56%) single sweep isolation was achieved. First pass isolation and RAPID mode only PVI was achieved in 362 (95%) and 357 (94%), respectively. Single sweep isolation rates varied across PVs from 46% at LIPV to 64% at RSPV. The mean total procedure and fluoroscopy times were 43 ± 10 and 4 ± 2 mins, respectively. Safety data and the complete follow-up will be reported. Conclusion The new X3 EAS equipped with a motor driven laser generator allows for single sweep PVI in 56% of PVs. Almost all PVs (94%) may be isolated with RAPID mode only leading to a very high first pass isolation rate. Altogether, this leads to substantially faster procedure times compared to the predecessor EAS.

Right coronary artery lesion is an uncommon and serious complication of typical atrial flutter ablation. We report a case of right coronary artery occlusion during atrial flutter ablation managed with percutaneous coronary intervention, combined with a review of the literature, in order to obtain pathogenetic and epidemiological information about this complication.

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) represents the cornerstone in atrial fibrillation ablation. Cryoballoon and laserballoon catheters have emerged as promising devices but lack randomized comparisons. Therefore, we sought to compare efficacy and safety comparing both balloons in patients with persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Symptomatic AF patients (n=200) were prospectively randomized (1:1) to receive either cryoballoon or laserballoon PVI (cryoballoon: n=100: 50 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation + 50 persistent AF versus laserballoon: n=100: 50 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation + 50 persistent AF). All antiarrhythmic drugs were stopped after ablation. Follow-up included 3-day Holter-ECG recordings and office visits at 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary efficacy end point was defined as freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia between 90 and 365 days after a single ablation. Secondary end points included procedural parameters and periprocedural complications. Results: Patient baseline parameters were not different between both groups. In all (n=200) complete PVI was obtained and the entire follow-up accomplished. Balloon only PVI was obtained in 98% (cryoballoon) versus 95% (laserballoon) requiring focal touch-up in 2 and 5 patients, respectively. Procedure but not fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in the cryoballoon group (50.9±21.0 versus 96.0±20.4 minutes; P P =0.083). Overall, the primary end point of no atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was met in 79% (cryoballoon: 80.0% versus laserballoon: 78.0%, P =ns). No death, atrio-esophageal fistula, tamponade, or vascular laceration requiring surgery occurred. In the cryoballoon group, 8 transient but no persistent phrenic nerve palsy were noted compared with 2 persistent phrenic nerve palsy and one transient ischemic attack in the laserballoon group. Conclusions: Both balloon technologies represent highly effective and safe tools for PVI resulting in similar favorable rhythm outcome after 12 months. Use of the cryoballoon is associated with significantly shorter procedure but not fluoroscopy time.

Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, procedural data, and lesion characteristics of the anterior line (AL) and roofline (RL) ablation by using ablation index (AI)-guided high power (50 W) among patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods Data from 35 consecutive patients with macro-reentrant left atrial tachycardia or substrate at the left atrium anterior wall or roof after previous PVI were collected. Ablation power was set to 50 W, targeting AI 500 for AL and 400 for RL. The first-pass conduction block (FPB) was evaluated. The AL was arbitrarily divided into three (caudal, middle, and cranial) segments to analyze the location of conduction gaps in non-FPB patients. Results A total of 32 AL and 17 RL were deployed and FPB was achieved in 24 (75%) and 14 (82%) of them, respectively. In the non-FPB group, the most frequent gap location along the AL was the middle third. The final block of AL was achieved in 97%, and the block of RL was achieved in 100%. The radiofrequency (RF) ablation time was short (2.9 ± 0.8 min for AL and 46.2 ± 15.6 s for RL). For AL, the female gender was significantly more frequent in FPB than in non-FPB patients (p = .028); patients with non-FPB were associated with significantly longer RF time as compared to patients with FPB (204 ± 47 s vs. 161 ± 41 s; p = .02). No procedural complications occurred. Conclusion AI-guided high-power (50 W) ablation appears to be a feasible, effective, and fast technique for AL and RL ablation.

Aims Cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an accepted ablation strategy for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). We describe efficacy and safety in a high volume centre with a long experience in the use of the second-generation CB (CB2). Methods and results Consecutive paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent AF (persAF) patients undergoing CB2-PVI were enrolled. Procedural data, efficacy, and safety issues were systematically collected. The 28 mm CB2 was used in combination with an inner lumen spiral catheter, a luminal oesophageal temperature (LET) probe was used with a cut-off of 15°C, the phrenic nerve (PN) monitored during septal PVs ablation. Freeze duration was mainly set at 240 s with a bonus application in case of delayed time-to-isolation (TTI > 75 s). A total of 1017 CB2 procedures were analysed (58% male, 66 ± 12 years old, 70% with PAF). 3964 PVs were identified, 99.8% PVs isolated using solely the 28 mm CB. Mean procedure time was 69 ± 25 min, TTI during the first application was recorded in 77% of PVs after a mean of 48 ± 31 s. We recorded 0.2% cardiac tamponade, 4.8% PN injury (1.6% of PN palsy), and 19% of LET Conclusion Cryoballoon procedures are fast and associated with a benign safety profile. Shorter TTI and longer freeze durations are associated with sinus rhythm during follow-up.

BACKGROUND Time-to-isolation (TTI) guided second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) ablation has been shown to be effective for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). OBJECTIVE The objective of this paper is to compare the safety and clinical outcome of CB2 PVI using the TTI guided 4 minutes vs 3 minutes freeze protocol. METHODS This was a propensity-matched study based on an institutional database. Symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent CB2 PVI and systematic follow-up were consecutively included. RESULTS A total of 573 patients were identified, of them 214 (107 matched-pairs) symptomatic AF (paroxysmal AF: 61%, persistent AF: 39%) patients (age: 67.7 ± 11.2 years) were analyzed. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Procedural time was significantly longer in the 4 minutes group compared to 3 minutes group (67.2 ± 21.8 vs 55.9 ± 16.9 minutes, P

Aims Systematic data on phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) associated with contemporary balloon ablation techniques (cryoballoon [CBA] vs laser balloon [LBA]) are sparse. We aimed to investigate the incidence, characteristics, and clinical recovery course in patients with PNP who underwent CBA or LBA. Methods and results A total of 2433 consecutive patients who underwent balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation (CBA: n = 1720 and LBA: n = 713) were retrospectively identified. PNP was classified into (a) transient (recovery before discharge) or (b) persistent (within 6 months, 6-12 months, and >12 months) according to clinical recovery course. In general, PNP occurred significantly more often in CBA 71/1720 (4.2%) than LBA 11/713 (1.5%) (P = .003). The rate of transient PNP was significantly higher in CBA (3.0%, n = 45) than LBA (0.1%, n = 1, P = .004). The rate of persistent PNP did not significantly differ between two groups (CBA: 1.2% vs LBA: 1.4%, P = .89). The rate of persistent PNP which recovered within 6 months was similar (CBA: 17.4% vs LBA 18.2%, P = 1.000). However, the rates of persistent PNP which recovered within 6 to 12 months (CBA: 2.9% vs LBA 27.3%, P = .0171) and more than 12 months (CBA: 7.3% vs LBA 45.5%, P = .0034) were significantly higher in LBA. Conclusion PNP occurred more often in CBA than LBA, however, the majority of PNP in CBA was transient whereas the majority of PNP in LBA was persistent. Either balloon technology is not superior in terms of long-term PNP.

Background Myocarditis represents a common but often under-diagnosed disease, with a wide range of clinical presentations; diagnosis is often presumptive and a clear etiology leading to a specific therapeutic approach is usually not identified. Purpose To describe and assess disease etiology in a cohort of myocarditis patients (pts) with arrhythmic presentation undergoing an invasive diagnostic work-up. Methods All pts with myocarditis presenting with ventricular arrhythmias undergoing an electro-anatomical mapping (EAM) guided endo-myocardial biopsy (EMB) at our institution were enrolled. All enrolled pts also underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and an electrophysiological study (EPS). Demographics, arrhythmic presentation, MRI data, arrhythmic inducibility at EPS, EAM and EMB biopsy data were retrieved and analyzed. Molecular biology testing for cardio-tropic virus genome as well as leukocyte immunohistochemical typization were routinely performed on all EMB samples. Results Twenty-six pts were enrolled (85% male, 39±6 y.o.). Clinical presentation was an organized ventricular arrhythmia in 16 (62%) pts (n=3 non-sustained ventricular arrhythmia; n=9 sustained ventricular arrhythmia; n=4 ventricular fibrillation) while frequent (>10.000) premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) in the remaining 10 (38%) pts. MRI showed a late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) pattern consistent with myocarditis in all pts (35% left LGE; 65% right LGE). At the EPS, 10 (38%) pts showed inducibility for SVTs and underwent an intra-cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implant, while 4 (16%) more were implanted for secondary arrhythmic prevention. EAM was performed in 18 (70%), 6 (22%) and 2 (8%) pts in the right, left and in both ventricle respectively; in all cases, abnormal myocardial voltages were retrieved in the area showing LGE at MRI. Extensive myocardial scarring was detected in 7 (27%) pts. All EMB were performed without peri-procedural complications; inflammatory infiltrate and substrate alteration consistent with myocarditis were retrieved in 100% of the bioptic samples. Viral genome was identified in 13 (50%) samples (n=5 Human Herpes Virus 6; n=2 Parvovirus B 19; n=3 Adenovirus; n=1 Ebstein Barr Virus; n=1 Cytomegalovirus; n=1 Rhinovirus) and specific human immunoglobulin treatment was undergone by a single pt; eosinophilic infiltration was found in 2 (8%) patients; lymphocite invasion and auto-antibodies consistent with auto-immune myocarditis were detected in 2 (8%) patients and appropriate immunosuppressive therapy was started, while a myocardial band contraction pattern typical of toxic myocarditis was found in a single (4%) patient [Figure 1]. Different Myocarditis Etiology Rates Conclusion In our myocarditis cohort, EMB confirmed viruses to represented the first myocarditis etiological agent. Despite an invasive work-out, 31% of the cohort etiology still remains unclear.

Background Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a genetically inherited cardiomyopathy characterized by myocardial fibro-fatty replacement. A pathogenetic role of viral myocardial infections in ACM natural history has been proposed over the years, although no definitive conclusion has been reached yet. Purpose To describe viral genome presence into a cohort of ACM biopsy proven patients (pts) and its impact on clinical features and outcome. Methods A cohort of all ACM pts undergoing an invasive third level evaluation at our institution was enrolled. All pts underwent a cardiac magnetic resonance (MR), an invasive electrophysiological study (EPS) with endo-cavitary electro-anatomical mapping (EAM), and a EAM guided endo-myocardial biopsy (EMB). Viral genome research through molecular biology techniques was performed on all biopsied samples. According to arrhythmic risk evaluation, a trans-catheter ablation (TCA) and/or an internal cardioverter device (ICD) implant was performed. Clinical arrhythmic presentation, MR data, arrhythmia inducibility at EPS, EAM and EMB characteristic, and arrhythmic events at a 12-month follow up visit were retrieved in all pts and compared between the viral genome positive (v+ACM) and negative group (v-ACM). Results Forty-five pts were enrolled in our study (48±13 years; 66% male); the EMB samples of 7 (15%) pts presented a lymphocytic infiltrate and tested positive for viral genome (n=3 B19 Parvovirus; n=2 for Citomegalovirus; n=2 for Ebstein-Bar Virus) [Figure1]. At arrhythmic presentation, complex ventricular arrhythmias (NSVT, SVT and FV) were more frequent in the v+ACM group (86% vs 50%; p=0.039). Both left and right ventricular ejection fraction at MR resulted more depressed in the v+ACM group (44±7 vs 52±2 and 47±2 vs 52±2; p=0.047 and p=0.041). Complex ventricular arrhythmia inducibility at EPS was more frequent in v+ACM (72% vs 34%; p=0.032), while no differences in pathological potentials rate and extension at unipolar and bipolar EAM were found. TCA was performed in 55% and 57% and an ICD was implanted in 29% and 42% in the v+ACM and v-ACM group respectively. No differences in 12-months arrhythmic event rates (39% vs 42%) between the two groups were described. EBM at different magnifications/stains Conclusion In our cohort a viral infection super-imposed to the fibrofatty infiltration was found in 15% of the patients. ACM pts testing positive for viral genome at the EMB had a more severe arrhythmic disease presentation, a more impaired heart function, and a higher rate of complex ventricular arrhythmias at disease presentation, but seemed to respond as well as viral genome negative ACM to ablative and pharmacological treatment

This study sought to determine whether cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may identify structural heart disease (SHD) in patients with ventricular arrhythmia who had echocardiography ruled out pathological findings.Approximately one-half of sudden cardiac deaths are attributable to malignant VA. Echocardiography is commonly used to identify SHD that is the most frequent substrate of VA.A single-center prospective study was conducted in consecutive patients with significant VA, categorized as1,000 but 10,000 ventricular ectopic beats [VEBs]/24 h; ≥10,000 VEBs/24 h; nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or a history of resuscitated cardiac arrest, and no pathological findings at echocardiography, requiring a clinically indicated CMR. Primary endpoint was CMR detection of SHD. Secondary endpoints were a composite of CMR detection of SHD and abnormal findings not specific for a definite SHD diagnosis.A total of 946 patients were enrolled (mean 41 ± 16 years of age; 64% men). CMR studies were used to diagnose SHD in 241 patients (25.5%) and abnormal findings not specific for a definite SHD diagnosis in 187 patients (19.7%). Myocarditis (n = 91) was the more frequent disease, followed by arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (n = 55), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 39), ischemic heart disease (n = 22), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 13), congenital cardiac disease (n = 10), left ventricle noncompaction (n = 5), and pericarditis (n = 5). The strongest univariate and multivariate predictors of SHD on CMR images were chest pain (odds ratios [OR]: 2.52 and 2.38, respectively) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (ORs: 2.67 and 2.23, respectively).SHD was able to be identified on CMR imaging in a sizable number of patients with significant VA and completely normal echocardiography. Chest pain and sustained ventricular tachycardia were the strongest predictors of positive CMR imaging results.

Background The third-generation laser balloon (LB3) became available recently. We aimed to describe the impact on procedural efficacy and safety of LB3 compared to the second generation LB2 for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Consecutive patients treated with the LB3 for symptomatic AF were enrolled. As a control group the previous consecutive patients treated with the LB2 were analyzed. Acute procedural data and complications between two groups were retrospectively analyzed. Results A total of 84 patients with LB3 (317 PVs, 75.9% Paroxysmal AF) and the previous 100 patients (387 PVs, 63.0 % Paroxysmal AF) with LB2 who underwent PVI were enrolled in this study. LB3 enabled significantly shorter procedural time (LB3: 60.6 ± 22.0 min vs LB2: 100.9 ± 21.5 min, P

Background Aim of the study was to evaluate image quality, radiation exposure and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) performed with a novel cardiac CT scanner in patients with very high heart rate (HR). Methods We prospectively enrolled 202 patients (111 men, mean age 66±8years) with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent CCTA with a whole-organ volumetric CT scanner. The HR during the scan was ≥80bpm in 100 patients (Group 1), while it was ≤65bpm in the remaining 102 patients (Group 2). In all patients, image quality score and coronary interpretability were evaluated and effective dose (ED) was recorded. In 86 of the 202 enrolled patients (40 patients in Group 1, 46 patients in Group 2) who were referred for a clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 6months, diagnostic accuracy of CCTA vs. ICA was evaluated. Results Mean image quality and coronary interpretability were very high in both Groups (Likert=3.35 vs. 3.39 and 97.3% [1542/1584 segments] and 98% [1569/1600 segments] in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively). Mean ED was lower in Group 2 (1.1±0.5mSv) compared to Group 1 (2.9±1.6mSv). In Group 1, sensitivity and specificity of CCTA for detection of >50% stenosis vs. ICA were 95.2% and 98.9% in a segment-based analysis and 100% and 81.8% in a patient-based analysis, respectively. Conclusions The whole organ high-definition CT scanner allows evaluating coronary arteries in patients with high HR with excellent image quality, coronary interpretability and low radiation exposure.