1. Individualized Studies of Triggers of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
- Author
-
Marcus, Gregory M, Modrow, Madelaine Faulkner, Schmid, Christopher H, Sigona, Kathi, Nah, Gregory, Yang, Jiabei, Chu, Tzu-Chun, Joyce, Sean, Gettabecha, Shiffen, Ogomori, Kelsey, Yang, Vivian, Butcher, Xochitl, Hills, Mellanie True, McCall, Debbe, Sciarappa, Kathleen, Sim, Ida, Pletcher, Mark J, and Olgin, Jeffrey E
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,Heart Disease ,Cardiovascular ,Substance Misuse ,Clinical Research ,Comparative Effectiveness Research ,Prevention ,Stroke ,Good Health and Well Being ,Adult ,Aged ,Alcohol Drinking ,Atrial Fibrillation ,Caffeine ,Cold Temperature ,Dehydration ,Electrocardiography ,Exercise ,Feeding Behavior ,Female ,Humans ,Male ,Middle Aged ,Patient Positioning ,Quality of Life ,Self Report ,Single-Case Studies as Topic ,Sleep ,Smartphone ,Wearable Electronic Devices ,Cardiovascular medicine and haematology - Abstract
ImportanceAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. Although patients have reported that various exposures determine when and if an AF event will occur, a prospective evaluation of patient-selected triggers has not been conducted, and the utility of characterizing presumed AF-related triggers for individual patients remains unknown.ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that n-of-1 trials of self-selected AF triggers would enhance AF-related quality of life.Design, setting, and participantsA randomized clinical trial lasting a minimum of 10 weeks tested a smartphone mobile application used by symptomatic patients with paroxysmal AF who owned a smartphone and were interested in testing a presumed AF trigger. Participants were screened between December 22, 2018, and March 29, 2020.Interventionsn-of-1 Participants received instructions to expose or avoid self-selected triggers in random 1-week blocks for 6 weeks, and the probability their trigger influenced AF risk was then communicated. Controls monitored their AF over the same time period.Main outcomes and measuresAF was assessed daily by self-report and using a smartphone-based electrocardiogram recording device. The primary outcome comparing n-of-1 and control groups was the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) score at 10 weeks. All participants could subsequently opt for additional trigger testing.ResultsOf 446 participants who initiated (mean [SD] age, 58 [14] years; 289 men [58%]; 461 White [92%]), 320 (72%) completed all study activities. Self-selected triggers included caffeine (n = 53), alcohol (n = 43), reduced sleep (n = 31), exercise (n = 30), lying on left side (n = 17), dehydration (n = 10), large meals (n = 7), cold food or drink (n = 5), specific diets (n = 6), and other customized triggers (n = 4). No significant differences in AFEQT scores were observed between the n-of-1 vs AF monitoring-only groups. In the 4-week postintervention follow-up period, significantly fewer daily AF episodes were reported after trigger testing compared with controls over the same time period (adjusted relative risk, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43- 0.83; P
- Published
- 2022