Dias-Oliveira, A., Sicardy, B., Lellouch, E., Vieira-Martins, R., Assafin, M., Camargo, J. I. B., Braga-Ribas, F., Gomes-Júnior, A. R., Benedetti-Rossi, G., Colas, F., Decock, A., Doressoundiram, A., Dumas, C., Emilio, M., Polleri, J. Fabrega, Gil-Hutton, R., Gillon, M., Girard, J., Hau, G., Ivanov, V. D., Jehin, E., Lecacheux, J., Leiva, R., Lopez-Sisterna, C., Mancini, L., Maury, A., Meza, E., Morales, N., Nagy, L., Opitom, C., Ortiz, J. L., Pollock, J., Roques, F., Snodgrass, C., Soulier, J. F., Thirouin, A., Vanzi, L., Widemann, T., Reichart, D. E., LaCluyze, A. P., Haislip, J. B., Ivarsen, K. M., Dominik, M., Jørgensen, U., and Skottfelt, J.
We analyze two multi-chord stellar occultations by Pluto observed on July 18th, 2012 and May 4th, 2013, and monitored respectively from five and six sites. They provide a total of fifteen light-curves, twelve of them being used for a simultaneous fit that uses a unique temperature profile, assuming a clear (no-haze) and pure N_2 atmosphere, but allowing for a possible pressure variation between the two dates. We find a solution that fits satisfactorily (i.e. within the noise level) all the twelve light-curves, providing atmospheric constraints between ~1,190 km (pressure ~ 11 \mubar) and ~ 1,450 km (pressure ~0.1 \mubar) from Pluto's center. Our main results are: (1) the best-fitting temperature profile shows a stratosphere with strong positive gradient between 1,190 km (at 36 K, 11 \mubar) and r = 1,215 km (6.0 \mubar), where a temperature maximum of 110 K is reached; above it is a mesosphere with negative thermal gradient of -0.2 K/km up to ~ 1,390 km (0.25 \mubar), where, the mesosphere connects itself to a more isothermal upper branch around 81 K; (2) the pressure shows a small (6 %) but significant increase (6-\sigma level) between the two dates; (3) without troposphere, Pluto's radius is found to be R_P = 1,190 +/- 5km. Allowing for a troposphere, R_P is constrained to lie between 1,168 and 1,195 km; (4) the currently measured CO abundance is too small to explain the mesospheric negative thermal gradient. Cooling by HCN is possible, but only if this species is largely saturated; Alternative explanations like zonal winds or vertical compositional variations of the atmosphere are unable to explain the observed mesospheric trend., Comment: 41 pages, 13 figures, 4 tables