Search

Tilltal (Tillgängligt kulturarv för forskning i tal, 'Accessible cultural heritage for speech research') is a multidisciplinary and methodological project undertaken by the Institute of Language and Folklore, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, and The Swedish National Archives in cooperation with the National Language Bank and SWE-CLARIN [1]. It aims to provide researchers better access to archival audio recordings using methods from language technology. The project comprises three case studies and one activity and usage study. In the case studies, actual research agendas from three different fields (ethnology, sociolinguistics and interaction analysis) serve as a basis for identifying procedures that may be simplified with the aid of digital tools. In the activity and usage study, we are applying an activity-theoretical approach with the aim of involving researchers and investigating how they use - and would like to be able to use - the archival resources at ISOF. Involving researchers in participatory design ensures that digital solutions are suggested and evaluated in relation to the requirements expressed by researchers engaged in specific research tasks [2]. In this paper we focus on one of the case studies, which investigates the process by which personal experience narratives are transformed into cultural heritage [3], and account for our results in exploring how different types of text material from the archives can be used to find relevant sections of the audio recordings. Finally, we discuss what lessons can be learned, and what conclusions can be drawn, from our experiences of interdisciplinary collaboration in the project., QC 20210322

Selenium compounds like selenite and selenate have strong inhibitory effects, particularly on mammalian tumor cell growth by unknown mechanisms. We found that the addition of sodium selenite and sodium selenate inhibited the growth of human 3B6 and BL41 lymphocytes. Selenite was more potent because 10 microM selenite produced a growth inhibitory effect similar to that of 250 microM selenate. The mechanism of action of selenite and selenate appears to be different. 3B6 and BL41 cells treated with selenite accumulated in the S-phase; however, selenate caused an accumulation of cells in G2. Selenite-mediated growth inhibition was irreversible, although the effects of selenate could be reversed. Selenite, in contrast to selenate, is efficiently reduced by the thioredoxin system (thioredoxin, thioredoxin reductase, and NADPH). At concentrations required to observe a similar effect on cell growth, the activity of thioredoxin reductase, recently shown to be a selenoprotein, increased in selenite-treated cells and decreased in selenate-treated cells. Ribonucleotide reductase activity was inhibited in an in vitro assay by selenite and selenodiglutathione but not by selenate. These results show that selenite and selenate use different mechanisms to inhibit cell growth.