Search

Background: As guidelines endorse the use of computed tomography (CT) for examining coronary artery disease (CAD), it is important to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the novel photon counting detector CT (PCD-CT) technology with the established energy integrating detector CT (EID-CT). Purpose: To compare the image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and the Agatston scores (AS) derived from EID-CT and PCD-CT. Material and Methods: In this prospective observational study, 28 patients underwent clinical calcium score and CCTA scans on an EID-CTand a PCD-CT scanner. CCTA images were qualitatively analyzed by five observers using visual grading characteristics. The correlation and agreement of the AS were assessed using Spearmans rank correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Results: This qualitative analyses demonstrated a high fraction of " good" or "excellent" ratings for the image criteria in both CT systems. The sharpness of the distal lumen and image quality regarding motion artifacts were rated significantly higher for EID-CT (P < 0.05). However, the sharpness of coronary calcification was rated significantly higher for PCD-CT (P < 0.05). Spearmans rank correlation and Bland-Altman plots showed good correlation (P = 0.95) and agreement regarding the AS between EID-CT and PCD-CT. Conclusion: Both CT systems exhibited high CCTA image quality. The sharpness of calcifications was rated significantly higher for PCD-CT. A good correlation was observed between the AS derived from the two systems., Funding: We thank Mats Fredriksson, PhD, Forum Ostergotland, Faculty of Medicine, Linkoping, Sweden, who provided help with the statistics. We are grateful to Bente Konst, PhD, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linkoping University, Linkopi; Forum Ostergotland, Faculty of Medicine, Linkoping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV)

CASE PRESENTATION: A 26-year-old man presented with a 2-week history of productive cough and a 1-year history of effort-related dyspnea. His medical history was significant for hay fever and exertion-triggered asthma. He was not taking medicines regularly but was using inhaled salbutamol as needed. He was an ex-smoker, with a previous history of 2-pack years.

BACKGROUND: We studied patients treated with radical cystectomy for locally advanced bladder cancer to compare the results of both preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and conventional CT with the findings of postoperative histopathological evaluation of lymph nodes. METHODS: Patients who had bladder cancer and were candidates for cystectomy underwent preoperative PET/CT using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and conventional CT. The results regarding lymph node involvement were independently evaluated by two experienced radiologists and were subsequently compared with histopathology results, the latter of which were reassessed by an experienced uropathologist (HO). RESULTS: There were 54 evaluable patients (mean age 68 years, 47 [85 %] males and 7 [15 %] females) with pT and pN status as follows: < pT2-14 (26 %), pT2-10 (18 %), and > pT2-30 (56 %); pN0 37 (69 %) and pN+ 17 (31 %). PET/CT showed positive lymph nodes in 12 patients (22 %), and 7 of those cases were confirmed by histopathology; the corresponding results for conventional CT were 11 (20 %) and 7 patients (13 %), respectively. PET/CT had 41 % sensitivity, 86 % specificity, 58 % PPV, and 76 % NPV, whereas the corresponding figures for conventional CT were 41 %, 89 %, 64 %, and 77 %. Additional analyses of the right and left side of the body or in specified anatomical regions gave similar results. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, PET/CT and conventional CT had similar low sensitivity in detecting and localizing regional lymph node metastasis in bladder cancer.