Search

Background: The concept of aneurysm "complexity" has undergone significant changes in recent years, with advancements in endovascular treatments. However, surgical clipping remains a relevant option for middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms. Hence, the classical criteria used to define surgically complex MCA aneurysms require updating. Our objective is to review our institutional series, considering the impacts of various complexity features, and provide a treatment strategy algorithm. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional experience with "complex MCA" aneurysms and analyzed single aneurysmal-related factors influencing treatment decisions. Results: We identified 14 complex cases, each exhibiting at least two complexity criteria, including fusiform shape (57%), large size (35%), giant size (21%), vessel branching from the sac (50%), intrasaccular thrombi (35%), and previous clipping/coiling (14%). In 92% of cases, the aneurysm had a wide neck, and 28% exhibited tortuosity or stenosis of proximal vessels. Conclusions: The optimal management of complex MCA aneurysms depends on a decision-making algorithm that considers various complexity criteria. In a modern medical setting, this process helps clarify the choice of treatment strategy, which should be tailored to factors such as aneurysm morphology and patient characteristics, including a combination of endovascular and surgical techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Treatment for meningiomas involving the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) is challenging and proved to be associated with higher risks compared to other brain locations. Therapeutical strategies may be either microsurgical (sub-)total resection or adjuvant radiation, or a combination of both. Thrombosis or SSS occlusion following resection or radiosurgery needs to be further elucidated to assess whether single or combined treatment is superior. We here present tumor control and side effect data of robotic radiosurgery (RRS) in combination with or without microsurgery. Methods: From our prospective database, we identified 137 patients with WHO grade I meningioma involving the SSS consecutively treated between 2005 and 2020. Treatment decisions were interdisciplinary. Patients underwent RRS as initial/solitary treatment (group 1), as adjuvant treatment after subtotal resection (group 2), or due to recurrent tumor growth after preceding microsurgery (group 3). Positive tumor response was assessed by MRI and defined as reduction of more than 50% of volume. Study endpoints were time to recurrence (TTR), time to RRS, risk factors for decreased survival, and side effects. Overall and specific recurrence rates for treatment groups were analyzed. Side effect data included therapy-related morbidity during follow-up (FU). Results: A total of 137 patients (median age, 58.3 years) with SSS meningiomas WHO grade I were analyzed: 51 patients (37.2%) in group 1, 15 patients (11.0%) in group 2, and 71 patients (51.8%) in group 3. Positive MR (morphological response) to therapy was achieved in 50 patients (36.4%), no response was observed in 25 patients (18.2%), and radiological tumor progression was detected in 8 patients (5.8%). Overall 5-year probability of tumor recurrence was 15.8% (median TTR, 41.6 months). Five-year probabilities of recurrence were 0%, 8.3.%, and 21.5% for groups 1-3 (p = 0.06). In multivariate analysis, tumor volume was significantly associated with extent of SSS occlusion (p = 0.026) and sex (p = 0.011). Tumor volume significantly correlated with TTR (p = 0.0046). Acute sinus venous thrombosis or venous congestion-associated bleedings did not occur in any of the groups. Conclusion: RRS for grade I meningiomas with SSS involvement represents a good option as first-line treatment, occasionally also in recurrent and adjuvant scenarios as part of a multimodal treatment strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]