Search

Acute oesophageal necrosis, black oesophagus (BE) or Gurvits syndrome (GS) is a rare form of severe oesophagitis appearing as a striking circumferential discolouration of distal mucosa with various proximal extensions abruptly terminating at the gastro-oesophageal junction. It is most commonly associated with acute exacerbations of medical comorbidities, while associations with altered gut anatomy are rare. We present a unique constellation of BE, Cameron ulcers (CU), and gastric volvulus from a large paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Our patient recently recovered from COVID-19 and was malnourished and frail, while the expanding paraesophageal hiatal hernia turned into an acute organoaxial gastric volvulus with accompanying outlet obstruction. In low-flow post-COVID coagulopathic states, compensatory mechanisms may lack against gastric stunning and sudden massive reflux on the oesophagus. We additionally performed a systematic review and discovered additional cases with coexistent volvulus and paraesophageal hernia, although there are no previous reports of BE with CU, which makes this study the first.

EUS-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has gained momentum in recent years, especially with availability of newer needle designs. Given the emerging comparative data on EUS-LB with second-generation needles and percutaneous LB (PC-LB), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of the two techniques. We searched multiple databases from inception through November 2021 to identify studies comparing outcomes of EUS-LB and PC-LB. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects model, and the results were expressed in terms of pooled proportions and odds ratio (OR) along with relevant 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Five studies with 748 patients were included in the final analysis. EUS-LB was performed in 276 patients and PC-LB in 472 patients. Across all studies, PC-LB had an overall higher diagnostic accuracy than EUS-LB, 98.6% confidence interval (CI: 94.7-99.7) versus 88.3% (49.6-98.3), OR: 1.65, P = 0.04. On assessing data from randomized controlled trials, there was no difference between the two. While pooled diagnostic adequacy and overall adverse events were not significantly different between PC-LB and EUS-LB, the former was superior in terms of the mean number of complete portal tracts (CPT) and total specimen length. PC-LB and EUS-LB produce similar results. PC-LB allows obtaining longer samples and more CPT. Further studies are needed to see if these trends hold up as more providers begin to perform EUS-LB.

A histological diagnosis of gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (SETs) is important due to the malignant potential of these lesions. The current modalities of choice including endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) have demonstrated suboptimal diagnostic success. Single incision with needle knife (SINK) biopsy has emerged as an alternative diagnostic approach to increase tissue acquisition and diagnostic success. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the technical success, diagnostic success, and adverse events of SINK biopsy. MethodsWe searched multiple databases including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to July 2022. The primary outcomes assessed were the technical success and diagnostic success of SINK in gastrointestinal SETs. The secondary outcomes assessed were adverse events and whether immunohistochemistry could be successfully performed on tissue samples obtained via SINK.Seven studies with a total of 219 SINK biopsy procedures were included in this meta-analysis. The technical success rate was 98.1% (95% CI: 94.9%, 99.3%; P = 0.000; ISINK biopsy is a safe diagnostic procedure with a high technical and diagnostic success in patients with gastrointestinal SET. Further randomized controlled trials and direct comparison studies are needed to validate these findings.

Goals and background Stress ulcer prophylaxis has been shown to lower gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) rates. Various agents have been studied, and the optimal strategy continues to be contested. This study evaluates the efficacy between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2-receptor antagonists. Small sample sizes and methodology flaws limited prior studies. Study A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials reporting the use of PPI and histamine-2-receptor antagonist reporting rates of GIB and standardized intensive care outcomes. Risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A trial sequential analysis was performed to guard against errors. Results A total of 14 randomized controlled trials of 28,526 patients with a mean age of 57.83±17.35 years and 30.82% females. In our pooled analysis, PPI outperformed its comparator (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.57-0.82) in clinically significant GIB. PPI re-demonstrated significant reduction in overt GIB (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.39-0.97). No differences between groups was noted toward all-cause mortality (RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00-1.10) or incidence of pneumonia (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.82-1.51). Duration of stay (SMD: 0.07; 95% CI: -0.04-0.17) and ventilator days (SMD: 0.01; 95% CI: -0.01-0.04) were indifferent between the groups. Conclusions Among critically ill patients, PPI was associated with reduced clinically significant or overt GIB. No differences in pneumonia were seen with the use of either agent. Trial sequential analysis for clinically significant GIB ruled out the risk for false-positive results, and thereby it is unlikely that future trials will affect our conclusions.

Hepatic sarcoidosis is an exceedingly rare extrapulmonary manifestation of sarcoidosis, with the majority remaining stable for years without clinical clues, only displaying biochemical abnormalities. Amongst the literature, the timeline to cirrhosis has not been parsed out; hepatomegaly develops in 50% and cirrhosis in 33% of all hepatic sarcoidosis patients, making this an essential issue in this patient population. Interestingly, the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma remains high regardless of cirrhosis development. Corticosteroids and biologics remain the mainstay of therapy, although refractory cases may require deeper immunosuppression. Liver transplantation is seen in a handful of cases with promising results. We present an interesting case of cholestatic pattern livery injury in our outpatient setting that was eventually discovered to be hepatic sarcoidosis. Mild biochemical derangements or sole elevations in alkaline phosphatase are under-recognized, and patients often progress to cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease. This diagnostic miss has significant implications and represents an opportunity to treat liver disease with a reversible cause. Consensus guidelines recommend alkaline phosphatase screening in newly diagnosed cases of sarcoidosis.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication of orthopedic surgery. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been the standard of care for thromboprophylaxis in this population. However, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly being used as alternatives.To assess the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in orthopedic surgery.We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until April 2020, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in orthopedic surgery.Twenty-five RCTs met inclusion criteria, including 40,438 patients, with a mean age of 68 years and 50% were males. Compared to LMWH, DOACs were associated with a significant reduction of major VTE; defined as the composite events of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and VTE-related mortality (RR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.20-0.53; P0.01), and total DVT (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.48-0.73; P0.01), but not PE (RR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.49-1.34; P=0.42). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups on the incidence of major bleeding (RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.77-1.27; P=0.92), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.92-1.17; P=0.52), all-cause mortality (RR 1.06; 95% CI: 0.64-1.76; P=0.83), VTE-related mortality (RR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.40-1.74; P=0.64) and bleeding-related mortality (RR 1.24; 95% CI: 0.30-5.18; P=0.77).For patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, thromboprophylaxis with DOACs is associated with a significant reduction of major VTE and DVT, compared to LMWH. Safety outcomes were not significantly different between both treatment groups.

Background Cancer associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) results in significant morbidity and mortality. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been standard of care for treatment of cancer-associated VTE, however direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are emerging as alternative treatment options. Objective To compare the benefits and harms of DOACs versus LMWH for treatment of VTE in cancer. Data sources MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to April 2020. Study selection Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing DOACs with LMWH for treatment of VTE in cancer patients. Data synthesis Four good-quality RCTs, met inclusion criteria. Compared with LMWH, DOACs were associated with lower rates of VTE recurrence (RR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.44–0.87; P = 0.006), and DVT recurrence (RR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.4–0.94; P = 0.02) but not PE recurrence (RR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51–1.04; P = 0.08), in cancer patients. However, the risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) (RR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11–2.24; P = 0.01), and major bleeding in gastrointestinal cancer (RR 2.55; 95% CI 1.24–5.27, P = 0.01), were higher with DOACs. The risk of overall major bleeding (RR 1.33; 95% CI: 0.84–2.1; P = 0.22), all-cause mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.84–1.17; P = 0.92), VTE-related mortality (RR: 1; 95% CI: 0.29–3.44; P = 1) and bleeding-related mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.17–2.91; P = 0.63), were similar in both treatment groups. Conclusion Among cancer patients with VTE, treatment with DOACs is associated with a significant reduction of VTE and DVT recurrence, compared to LMWH. These benefits were offset by an increased risk of CRNMB, and major bleeding in gastrointestinal cancer.

Acute esophageal necrosis (AEN), black esophagus, or Gurvits syndrome is a rare clinical disorder characterized by a striking endoscopic appearance of necrotic esophageal mucosa, universally affecting the distal esophagus and ending abruptly at the gastroesophageal junction. It has been gaining traction as a demonstrable cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the 21st century. Its pathophysiology is multifactorial affecting men and the elderly disproportionally, with a mortality rate nearing 36%. AEN has been associated with numerous conditions in the past, and we aim to present an unusual case of AEN on the setting of chronic alcohol use.

Critically ill patients (patients treated in a medical or surgical intensive care unit) are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) development (deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and/or pulmonary embolism). Multiple thromboprophylaxis strategies have been used for the prevention of VTE in this population with various outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) prophylaxis in the lower limb compared with no treatment, anticoagulant use, or their combinations in reducing risk. A comprehensive electronic database search was conducted for all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical outcomes of IPC versus anticoagulants or no treatment or their combinations for the prevention of VTE for critically ill patients. The primary outcome was VTE. The secondary outcome was DVT. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). We included 5 RCTs with 3133 total patients, represented by a mean age of 49.61 ± 18 years, while 60.28% were male. There was a significant reduction of the primary outcome (incidence of VTE events) when no treatment was compared with IPC (OR = 0.36; 95% CrI = 0.18-0.71), anticoagulation alone (OR = 0.30; 95% CrI = 0.12-0.68), or anticoagulation with IPC (OR = 0.34; 95% CrI = 0.13-0.81). In addition, there was a significant reduction in DVT when no treatment was compared with IPC (OR = 0.45; 95% CrI = 0.21-0.9), anticoagulation alone (OR = 0.16; 95% CrI = 0.03-0.66), or anticoagulation with IPC (OR = 0.18; 95% CrI = 0.03-0.84). However, there were no significant differences between other comparisons (IPC vs anticoagulation alone, anticoagulation alone vs anticoagulation with IPC, or anticoagulation with IPC vs IPC alone) regarding VTE or DVT incidence. Among critically ill patients, IPC alone, anticoagulation alone, and IPC with anticoagulation were associated with a significant reduction of VTE and DVT incidence compared with no treatment. However, there was no significant difference between these modalities when compared together. Therefore, further larger studies comparing those different thromboprophylaxis modalities and their combinations are needed to provide more robust results for future clinical recommendations.

Despite advances in endoscopic therapies, malignancy-related GI bleeding remains difficult to manage with high rates of treatment failure and rebleeding. Topical hemostatic agents (THAs) are easier to apply to the wide bleeding surface of tumors. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of THAs in malignancy-related GI bleeding.We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases to identify studies reporting on the use of THAs in malignancy-related GI bleeding. The primary outcome was the achievement of hemostasis; secondary outcomes were early rebleeding (≤3 days), delayed rebleeding (3 days), aggregate rebleeding, all-cause mortality, and GI bleeding-related mortality. A meta-analysis of proportions was done for all outcomes.Out of 355 citations, 16 studies with 530 patients were included. Primary hemostasis was achieved in 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.5-96.0). Early rebleeding was seen in 13.9% (95% CI, 9.7-19.4) and delayed rebleeding in 11.4% (95% CI, 5.8-21.1). Aggregate rebleeding was seen in 24.2% (95% CI, 18.5-31.0). All-cause mortality was 33.1% (95% CI, 23.7-44.0), whereas GI bleeding-related mortality occurred in 5.9% (95% CI, 2.2%-14.8).THAs are highly effective for achieving primary hemostasis in malignancy-related GI bleeding. It should be considered as an alternative to traditional endotherapy methods in malignancy-related GI bleeding. Future studies should be designed to evaluate its efficacy and safety as a primary method of hemostasis as compared with traditional endotherapy measures.

Background Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic progressive condition that is complicated by intestinal or colonic stricture in nearly 30% of cases within 10 years of the initial diagnosis. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is associated with a risk of perforations and recurrence rates of up to 60% at 5 years. Endoscopic stenting has been used as an alternative to EBD, but data on its safety and efficacy are limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the outcomes of endoscopic stenting in CD-related strictures. Methods A systematic and detailed search was run in January 2022 with the assistance of a medical librarian for studies reporting on outcomes of endoscopic stenting in CD-related strictures. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model, and results were expressed in terms of pooled proportions along with relevant 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Nine studies with 163 patients were included in the final analysis. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) including both partial and fully covered were used in 7 studies, whereas biodegradable stents were used in 2 studies. Pooled rate of clinical success and technical success was 60.9% (95% CI, 51.6-69.5; I2 = 13%) and 93% (95% CI, 87.3-96.3; I2 = 0%), respectively. Repeat stenting was needed in 9.6% of patients (95% CI, 5.3-16.7; I2 = 0%), whereas pooled rate of spontaneous stent migration was 43.9% (95% CI, 11.4-82.7; I2 = 88%). Pooled incidence of overall adverse events, proximal stent migration, perforation, and abdominal pain were 15.7%, 6.4%, 2.7%, and 17.9%, respectively. Mean follow-up period ranged from 3 months to 69 months. Discussion Endoscopic stenting in CD-related strictures is a safe technique that can be performed with technical ease, albeit with a limited clinical success. Postprocedure abdominal pain and proximal stent migration are some of the common adverse events reported.

Acute gastric volvulus is a rare yet life threatening condition with mortality ranging from 30% to 50% if not treated promptly. The stomach rotates on itself, causing strangulation precipitating necrosis, cameron lesions and perforation. Long-standing paraesophageal hernia is a common cause of organoaxial gastric volvulus.

Spontaneous bacterial empyema (SBE) occurs when a hepatic hydrothorax becomes infected and runs a course similar to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). It remains underdiagnosed as patients with cirrhosis do not routinely undergo diagnostic thoracentesis. Current understanding is limited by small cohorts, while studies reporting its association with ascites/SBP are conflicting.To explore the incidence of SBE, to determine its association with ascites, and to summarize what is known regarding treatment and outcomes for patients with SBE.Major databases were searched until June 2021. Outcomes include the incidence of SBE in pleural effusions, SBP in peritoneal fluid, and SBE in patients without ascites within our cohort of patients with cirrhosis. We performed a meta-analysis using a random-effects model with pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed heterogeneity usingEight studies with 8899 cirrhosis patients were included. The median age ranged between 41.2 to 69.7 years. The majority of the patients were Child-Pugh B and C. Mean MELD score was 18.6 ± 8.09. A total of 1334 patients had pleural effusions and the pooled incidence of SBE was 15.6% (CI 12.6-19;SBE frequently occurs with concurrent ascites/SBP; our results suggest high incidence rates of SBE even in the absence of ascites. The pleura can be an unrecognized nidus and our findings support the use of diagnostic thoracentesis in patients with decompensated cirrhosis after exclusion of other causes of pleural effusion. Thoracentesis should be considered particularly in patients without ascites and when there is a high suspicion of infection. The need for diagnostic thoracentesis will continue to be important as rates of multi-drug resistant bacterial infections increase and antibiotic susceptibility information is required for adequate treatment.

Upper GI bleeding (UGIB) is a common condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic hemostasis remains the mainstay of therapy and is mainly aimed at effective hemostasis and prevention of rebleeding. Lesions with high-risk stigmata can have rebleeding rates of as high as 26.3%. Rebleeding is associated with increased mortality and reduced success rates of endoscopic retreatment. The over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) is a device with widespread endoscopic indications including hemostasis for nonvariceal UGIB (NVUGIB). The current study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing OTSCs versus standard therapy (STD) for NVUGIB.Multiple databases were searched through April 2022 for studies comparing OTSCs and STD for NVUGIBs. Primary outcomes were clinical success rates, rebleeding rates, and procedure times, and secondary outcomes were mortality rates and length of hospitalization. Meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled odds ratios to compare outcomes between the OTSC and STD groups.Ten studies, including 4 randomized controlled trials, with 914 patients were included in the final analysis. Of patients with NVUGIB, 431 were treated with OTSCs and 483 with STD. Patients treated with OTSCs had an overall lower risk of 7-day (risk ratio [RR], .41; 95% confidence interval [CI], .24-.68; IAlthough our study was limited to high-risk NVUGIB, our analysis showed that hemostasis with OTSCs is associated with a lower 7-day and 30-day rebleeding rates, higher clinical success rates, and shorter procedure time with similar mortality rates and length of hospital stay as compared with STD.

Healthcare workers (HCWs) remain on the front line of the battle against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection and are among the highest groups at risk of infection during this raging pandemic. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the incidence of postvaccination SARS‐CoV‐2 infection among vaccinated HCWs. We searched multiple databases from inception through August 2021 to identify studies that reported on the incidence of postvaccination SARS‐CoV‐2 infection among HCWs. Meta‐analysis was performed to determine pooled proportions of COVID‐19 infection in partially/fully vaccinated as well as unvaccinated individuals. Eighteen studies with 228 873 HCWs were included in the final analysis. The total number of partially vaccinated, fully vaccinated, and unvaccinated HCWs were 132 922, 155 673, and 17 505, respectively. Overall pooled proportion of COVID‐19 infections among partially/fully vaccinated and unvaccinated HCWs was 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–3.5). Among partially vaccinated, fully vaccinated and unvaccinated HCWs, pooled proportion of COVID‐19 infections was 2.3% (CI 1.2–4.4), 1.3% (95% CI 0.6–2.9), and 10.1% (95% CI 4.5–19.5), respectively. Our analysis shows the risk of COVID‐19 infection in both partially and fully vaccinated HCWs remains exceedingly low when compared to unvaccinated individuals. There remains an urgent need for all frontline HCWs to be vaccinated against SARS‐CoV‐2 infection., Highlights The overall pooled proportion of COVID‐19 infections in partially vaccinated healthcare workers was 2.3%.The overall pooled proportion of COVID‐19 infections in fully vaccinated healthcare workers was 1.3%.The overall pooled proportion of COVID‐19 infections in unvaccinated healthcare workers was 10.1%.Our findings show decreased incidence of COVID‐19 infection as well as decreased incidence of hospitalization, ICU admission and deaths, amongst vaccinated HCWs. There remains an urgent need for healthcare workers to consider getting vaccinated against COVID‐19.

Pericardial effusion may be the tipping point to unravel hypothyroidism. Large effusions may not correlate with severity of cardiovascular compromise. Medical therapy over surgical intervention is appropriate if no evidence of cardiac tamponade.

While safety and effectiveness of advanced endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been well established in general population, data regarding their utility in patients with cirrhosis is limited.We searched multiple databases from inception through July 2021 to identify studies that reported on outcomes of EMR and/or ESD in patients with cirrhosis. Meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled rates of immediate and delayed bleeding, perforation, death as well as rates of successful en bloc and R0 resection. Pooled relative risk (RR) was calculated for each outcome between patients with and without cirrhosis.Ten studies with a total of 3244 patients were included in the final analysis. Pooled rates of immediatedelayed bleeding, perforation, and death during EMR and/or ESD in patients with cirrhosis were 9.5% (CI 4.0-21.1), 6.6% (CI 4.2-10.3), 2.1% (CI 1.1-3.9) and 0.6% (CI 0.2-1.7), respectively. Pooled rates of successful en bloc and R0 resection were 93% (CI 85.9-96.7) and 90.8% (CI 86.5-93.8), respectively. While incidence of immediate bleeding was higher in patients with cirrhosis, there was no statistically significant difference in any of the other outcomes between the patient groups.Our study shows that performing EMR and ESD for gastrointestinal lesions in patients with cirrhosis is both safe and effective. The risks of procedural complications parallel those reported in general population.

Dobhoff tubes, used for post‐pyloric feedings, have a weighted metal end with a small diameter that enhances their flexibility to traverse the gastrointestinal tract. Unfortunately, the metal stylet can iatrogenically perforate surrounding structures in patients with diminished cough and gag (1), and extreme caution should be considered before its utilization.

Colonoscopy is an effective procedure for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Perforation is a rare yet the most severe complication, identified by landmarks—double dolphin, triangle, or double‐wall sign signifying air and intracolonic contents leaking into the peritoneal space. Prompt recognition and surgical intervention are imperative to avoid high mortality.

Colonoscopies have reduced colorectal cancer (CRC) burden in the United States, and their utility has expanded to include various diagnostic and therapeutic indications. Complications are seen in up to 1% and increase with age and polypectomy. As colonoscopies become widespread, specific populations seem to be at a much higher risk; notably patients with heritable connective tissue disorders (HCTD). As life expectancy increases, these patients undergo routine screenings and require careful peri-endoscopic care to reduce adverse outcomes. Amongst HCTD, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is commonly implicated, however, no reports of Marfan syndrome (MS) exist. We present a unique case of splenic injury after colonoscopy in a patient with MS. Successful outcomes require early suspicion and emergent surgical evaluation in patients with hemodynamic instability after a colonoscopy. Increased ligament laxity and bowel fragility are the most likely mechanisms. Alternative CRC strategies like fecal immunochemical test (FIT), fecal occult, Cologuard, or virtual colonography can be considered.

Studies analyzing artificial intelligence (AI) in colonoscopies have reported improvements in detecting colorectal cancer (CRC) lesions, however its utility in the realworld remains limited. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluate the efficacy of AI-assisted colonoscopies against routine colonoscopy (RC). We performed an extensive search of major databases (through January 2021) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting adenoma and polyp detection rates. Odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Additionally, trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to guard against errors. Six RCTs were included (4996 participants). The mean age (SD) was 51.99 (4.43) years, and 49% were females. Detection rates favored AI over RC for adenomas (OR 1.77; 95% CI: 1.570–2.08) and polyps (OR 1.91; 95% CI: 1.68–2.16). Secondary outcomes including mean number of adenomas (SMD 0.23; 95% CI: 0.18–0.29) and polyps (SMD 0.23; 95% CI: 0.17–0.29) detected per procedure favored AI. However, RC outperformed AI in detecting pedunculated polyps. Withdrawal times (WTs) favored AI when biopsies were included, while WTs without biopsies, cecal intubation times, and bowel preparation adequacy were similar. Colonoscopies equipped with AI detection algorithms could significantly detect previously missed adenomas and polyps while retaining the ability to self-assess and improve periodically. More effective clearance of diminutive adenomas may allow lengthening in surveillance intervals, reducing the burden of surveillance colonoscopies, and increasing its accessibility to those at higher risk. TSA ruled out the risk for false-positive results and confirmed a sufficient sample size to detect the observed effect. Currently, these findings suggest that AI-assisted colonoscopy can serve as a useful proxy to address critical gaps in CRC identification.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) characteristically presents as a mononucleosis-like prodrome; rhabdomyolysis as a sole manifestation remains a rare finding from infection to seroconversion. A young male with a vague sexual history presented with myopathy progressing rapidly to rhabdomyolysis and renal failure. Acute HIV rarely presents with classic features, and rhabdomyolysis seems to manifest more in younger patients. Our case also demonstrates the importance of keeping a strong suspicion for HIV in the right setting despite false-negative results in the pre-seroconversion phase. The variability in HIV presentation and stigma of sexual history taking represents a diagnostic challenge. The astute clinician must be privy to these peculiarities to formulate a prompt diagnosis.

e14591 Background: Combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) have revolutionized treatment of solid tumors. Their use can lead to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) resulting in hospital admissions, treatment discontinuation and increased morbidity. We aim to evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) TRAEs of different combination ICPI. Methods: A comprehensive search of multiple databases from inception to October 2021 was performed. Phase 2 and 3 trials assessing safety and efficacy of combined ICPI in solid tumors were included. Trials reporting concurrent use of chemotherapy, immunosuppressants, targeted therapy, or sequential ICPI therapy were excluded. Primary outcome was pooled luminal, hepatic and pancreatic TRAEs. A meta-analysis of proportions was done for outcomes using a random-effects model. I2 % was used to assess heterogeneity. Results: Out of 3696 citations screened, 53 trials reporting TRAEs in 6186 patients were included. Data from 41 study arms of 35 trials in nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N+I), 15 study arms of 15 trials in durvalumab plus tremelimumab (D+T), 4 study arms of 3 trials in pembrolizumab plus ipilimumab (P+I). The most common indications for combined ICPI were melanoma (26.4%) and lung cancer (24.5%). Pooled GI TRAE rates from the D+T, P+I and two different dosing combinations of N+I are shown in the table. Conclusions: Our study provides pooled data of TRAEs from different combination ICPI use in solid tumors and demonstrates high incidence of all grades and ≥ 3 GI TRAEs. Combined ICPI related TRAEs should be recognized early, as it may require treatment discontinuation. Further studies are required to assess overall impact of TRAEs on treatment course and outcomes.[Table: see text]

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication associated with surgical procedures. The implementation of thromboprophylaxis in this population has become a vital aspect of perioperative care to decrease VTE-associated morbidity and mortality risk. However, data assessing the role of thromboprophylaxis for patients undergoing vascular surgery are sparse. Assessing the role of thromboprophylaxis by low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin in vascular surgery. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until December 2020, for randomized controlled trials assessing the role of thromboprophylaxis in vascular surgery. Results Eight randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria, including 3130 patients, with a mean age of 55.35 years and 45% were females. Compared with placebo, anticoagulant use was associated with a decrease in deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (risk ratio [RR], 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-1.05; P = .06; I2 = 68%) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (RR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.02-1.22; P = .08; I2 = 41%), but this trend did not attain statistical significance. There was no difference for bleeding outcomes between anticoagulants and placebo (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.05-15.01; P = .94; I2 = 76%). There was no significant difference in outcomes when low-molecular-weight heparin was compared directly with unfractionated heparin. In a sensitivity analysis, anticoagulant use was associated with a significant decrease in DVT or PE in patients undergoing venous surgeries, but was not associated with a significant decrease in DVT or PE in patients undergoing arterial surgeries, although this analysis was limited by the small number of studies in each group. Conclusions Among patients undergoing vascular surgery, thromboprophylaxis with anticoagulants showed a trend toward a lesser incidence of VTE when compared with placebo, although this difference was not statistically significant. Bleeding outcomes were comparable between both treatment groups.

Introduction: Acute esophageal necrosis (AEN) is an emerging cause of gastrointestinal bleeding with an increasing incidence over the past two decades. It appears as a circumferential necrotic lesion encircling the distal esophagus with various proximal extensions. It is most commonly associated with exacerbations of medical co-morbidities such as diabetes, renal failure, coronary disease;however cases of AEN due to mechanical alteration in gut anatomy are exceedingly rare and its prognosis is less defined. We present a unique constellation of AEN, Cameron ulcers (CU), and gastric volvulus from a large paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Case Description/Methods: A 77-year-old female began experiencing abdominal pain and repeated emesis. She had a history of COPD, GERD, episodes of bleeding ulcers, hiatal hernia, malnutrition, and recently COVID-19. She was hemodynamically stable, ill-appearing with tenderness to abdominal palpation and a negative stool guaiac. BP 106/48 mm/Hg, HR 107, requiring oxygen. Investigations revealed WBC 18.5 k/uL, Hgb 9.8 g/dL, and acute renal failure. A CT abdomen revealed complete herniation of the stomach into the posterior mediastinum, dilated esophagus, organoaxial gastric volvulus, and gastric distension [Figure 1 - Pane A-C]. IV fluids, pantoprazole 80 mg, and ondansetron 4 mg were given. An EGD revealed a large hiatal hernia, Cameron ulcers (CU), and necrotic ulceration along the mid-to-lower third of the esophagus. The patient deferred surgical intervention and was discharged home on hospice. Discussion: These constellations represent a common underlying pathophysiologic mechanism that stems from large hiatal hernias and their effect on surrounding structures in our case, precipitated by a paraesophageal hiatal hernia that became too large causing acute gastric volvulus. In severe presentations, the stomach may herniate into the posterior mediastinum known as an upside-down stomach requiring surgery while CU represents trauma to the mucosa from the hernia sliding. In our patient, lower esophagus blood flow traversing through the lesser gastric curvature may have been compromised during gastric necrosis. Simultaneously, sudden gastric stunning from acute outlet obstruction can lead to prolonged acidic bathing of the esophageal mucosa. Often the esophagus can compensate for this by increasing blood flow, however, this is compromised in low-flow states. Limitations of our study include lack of follow-up. A systematic review of all cases of AEN and gastric volvulus are in Table 1.