1. The Promise and Pitfalls of Conflict Prediction: Evidence from Colombia and Indonesia
- Author
-
Richard Merton Peck, Samuel Bazzi, Matthew Gudgeon, Robert A. Blair, Oeindrila Dube, and Christopher Blattman
- Subjects
bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science|Comparative Politics ,Economics and Econometrics ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Economics ,05 social sciences ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Economics ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Economics|Growth and Development ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science|Comparative Politics ,0502 economics and business ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences ,050207 economics ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Economics|Growth and Development ,Social Sciences (miscellaneous) ,050205 econometrics - Abstract
Policymakers can take actions to prevent local conflict before it begins, if such violence can be accurately predicted. We examine the two countries with the richest available sub-national data: Colombia and Indonesia. We assemble two decades one fine- grained violence data by type, alongside hundreds of annual risk factors. We predict violence one year ahead with a range of machine learning techniques. Models reliably identify persistent, high-violence hot spots. Violence is not simply autoregressive, as detailed histories of disaggregated violence perform best. Rich socio-economic data also substitute well for these histories. Even with such unusually rich data, however, the models poorly predict new outbreaks or escalations of violence. \Best case" scenarios with panel data fall short of workable early-warning systems.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF