Search

Lung nodules are frequently detected on low-dose computed tomography scans performed for lung cancer screening and incidentally detected on imaging performed for other reasons. There is wide variability in how lung nodules are managed by general practitioners and subspecialists, with high rates of guideline-discordant care. This may be due in part to the level of evidence underlying current practice guideline recommendations (primarily based on findings from uncontrolled studies of diagnostic accuracy). The primary aims of lung nodule management are to minimize harms of diagnostic evaluations while expediting the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Potentially useful tools such as lung cancer probability calculators, automated methods to identify patients with nodules in the electronic health record, and multidisciplinary team evaluation are often underused due to limited availability, accessibility, and/or provider knowledge. Finally, relatively little attention has been paid to identifying and reducing disparities among individuals with screening-detected or incidentally detected lung nodules. This contribution to the American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable Strategic Plan aims to identify and describe these knowledge gaps in lung nodule management and propose recommendations to advance clinical practice and research. Major themes that are addressed include improving the quality of evidence supporting lung nodule evaluation guidelines, strategically leveraging information technology, and placing emphasis on equitable approaches to nodule management. The recommendations outlined in this strategic plan, when carried out through interdisciplinary efforts with a focus on health equity, ultimately aim to improve early detection and reduce the morbidity and mortality of lung cancer. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Lung nodules may be identified on chest scans of individuals who undergo lung cancer screening (screening-detected nodules) or among patients for whom a scan was performed for another reason (incidental nodules). Although the vast majority of lung nodules are not lung cancer, it is important to have evidence-based, standardized approaches to the evaluation and management of a lung nodule. The primary aims of lung nodule management are to diagnose lung cancer while it is still in an early stage and to avoid unnecessary procedures and other harms., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Lung cancer is the leading cause of the incidence and mortality of malignant tumors in China. The 5-year survival rate released for China in 2018 was 19.7%. The 5-year survival rate for stage Ⅰ patients is 77%-92%. Early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer are key to improving the 5-year overall survival rate and prognosis of lung cancer patients. Therefore, experts from the Academic Group of Lung Cancer in Chinese Thoracic Society and Chinese Alliance Against Lung Cancer Expert Group formulated the Chinese Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Nodules in 2015 to standardize the diagnosis and treatment of lung nodules. In 2018, this consensus was updated to formulate the Chinese Expert Consensus on Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Nodules (2018 edition) , and widely applied in multiple branch centers of Chinese Alliance Against Lung Cancer, proposing the Intelligent Treatment of Million Early Lung Cancer Project . Based on applied experience of the expert consensus in recent years, with reference to the latest evidence has been updated, Chinese Expert Consensus on Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Nodules (2024 edition) was formulated. The updated content of this consensus mainly includes the following aspects: (1) Define the screening age of high-risk lung cancer populations in China based on the national conditions; (2) Propose definition of "difficult-to-determine pulmonary nodules" to avoid delaying the diagnosis and treatment; (3) Evaluate pulmonary nodules assisted by artificial intelligence (AI) imaging-assisted diagnostic system and propose human-machine MDT to avoid the limitations of AI; (4) Evaluate pulmonary nodules by routine and individualized evaluations for different populations, and make recommendations based on evidence-based management guidelines for different types and sizes of pulmonary nodules. In the updated consensus, 18 consensus points were recommended as a reference for clinical management of pulmonary nodules to improve the 5-year overall survival rate and the prognosis of lung cancer in China.

Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to explore the evidence regarding shared decision-making (SDM) in the management of pulmonary nodules., Design: Systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies., Data Source: Studies published in English or Chinese up to April 2022 were extracted from nine databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data and SinoMed Data., Eligibility Criteria: Studies were eligible if patients or healthcare providers are faced with pulmonary nodule management options or the interventions or experiences were focused on the patient-healthcare provider relationship or health education to make, increase or support shared decisions. All types of studies were included, including quantitative and qualitative studies. Grey literature and literature that had not been peer reviewed were excluded. Poster abstracts and non-empirical publications such as editorials, letters, opinion papers and review articles were excluded., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, assessed quality using Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools, and extracted data from included studies. Thematic syntheses were used to identify prominent themes emerging from the data., Results: A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, 11 of which were conducted in USA. These included six qualitative studies and six quantitative studies (including both survey and quasi-experimental designs). Three major themes with specific subthemes emerged: (1) Opportunity (uncertainty in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary nodules, willingness to participate in decision-making); (2) Ability (patient's lack of knowledge, physician's experience); and (3) Different worldview (misconception, distress among patients, preference for diagnosis and treatment)., Conclusions: Uncertainty in the management of pulmonary nodules is the opportunity to implement SDM. Patients' lack of knowledge, distress, and misunderstandings between healthcare providers and patients are both the main obstacles and the causes of the application of SDM., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background:  Due to the greater use of high-resolution cross-sectional imaging, the number of incidental pulmonary nodules detected each year is increasing. Although the vast majority of incidental pulmonary nodules are benign, many early lung carcinomas could be diagnosed with consistent follow-up. However, for a variety of reasons, the existing recommendations are often not implemented correctly. Therefore, potential for improvement with respect to competence, communication, structure, and process is described., Methods:  This article presents the recommendations for incidental pulmonary nodules from the current S3 guideline for lung cancer (July 2023). The internationally established recommendations (BTS guidelines and Fleischner criteria) are compared and further studies on optimized management were included after a systematic literature search in PubMed., Results and Conclusion:  In particular, AI-based software solutions are promising, as they can be used in a support capacity on several levels at once and can lead to simpler and more automated management. However, to be applicable in routine clinical practice, software must fit well into the radiology workflow and be integrated. In addition, "Lung Nodule Management" programs or clinics that follow a high-quality procedure for patients with incidental lung nodules or nodules detected by screening have been established in the USA. Similar structures might also be implemented in Germany in a future screening program in which patients with incidental pulmonary nodules could be included., Key Points:   · Incidental pulmonary nodules are common but are often not adequately managed. · The updated S3 guideline for lung cancer now includes recommendations for incidental pulmonary nodules. · Competence, communication, structure, and process levels offer significant potential for improvement., Citation Format: · Glandorf J, Vogel-Claussen J, . Incidental pulmonary nodules - current guidelines and management. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 582 - 590., Competing Interests: Jens Vogel-Claussen declares for the last 3 years:Research support: German Center for Lung Research (DZL, BMBF), NIH, Siemens Healthineers, GSK, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, NovartisFees for lectures/consulting: Siemens Healthineers, GSK, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Coreline Soft, Bayer, Roche, (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

The management of peripheral lung nodules is challenging, requiring specialized skills and sophisticated technologies. The diagnosis now appears accessible to advanced endoscopy (see Part 1), which can also guide treatment of these nodules; this second part provides an overview of endoscopy techniques that can enhance surgical treatment through preoperative marking, and stereotactic radiotherapy treatment through fiduciary marker placement. Finally, we will discuss how, in the near future, these advanced endoscopic techniques will help to implement ablation strategy., (Copyright © 2024 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objectives: Multidisciplinary nodule clinics provide high-quality care and favor adherence to guidelines. Virtual care has shown savings benefits along with patient satisfaction. Our aim is to describe the first year of operation of a multidisciplinary virtual lung nodule clinic, the population evaluated and issued decisions. Secondarily, among discharged patients, we aimed to analyze their follow-up prior to the existence of our consultation, evaluating its adherence to guidelines., Materials and Methods: Observational study including all patients evaluated at the Virtual Lung Nodule Clinic (VLNC) (March 2018- March 2019). Clinical and radiological data were recorded. Recommendations, based on 2017 Fleischner Society guidelines, were categorized into follow-up, discharge or referral to lung cancer consultation. Discharged patients were classified according to adherence to guidelines of their previous management, into adequate, prolonged and non-indicated follow-up., Results: A total of 365 patients (58.9% men; median age 64.0 years) were included. Sixty-four percent had smoking history and 23% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Most nodules were solid (87.4%) and multiple (57.5%). The median diameter was 6.00 mm. 43.8% of patients were discharged following first VLNC evaluation. Among them, 27.5% had received appropriate follow-up, but 66.9% had received poor management. Patients with prolonged follow-up (33.1%) were older (67.0 vs 60.5 years) and had larger nodules (6.00 mm vs 5.00). Non-indicated follow-up patients (33.8%) were more non-smokers (77.8% vs 31.8%) and presented smaller nodules (4.00 vs 5.00 mm)., Conclusions: During its first year of operation, the VLNC has evaluated a population with a relevant risk profile for lung cancer development, management of which should be cautious and adhere to guidelines. After the first VLNC assessment, approximately one-half of this population was discharged. It was noticeable that previous follow-up of discharged patients was found poorly adherent to guidelines, with a marked tendency to overmanagement., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Health care organizations are increasingly developing systems to ensure patients with pulmonary nodules receive guideline-adherent care. Our goal was to determine patient and organization factors that are associated with radiologist adherence as well as clinician and patient concordance to 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines for incidental pulmonary nodule follow-up., Materials: Trained researchers abstracted data from the electronic health record from two Veterans Affairs health care systems for patients with incidental pulmonary nodules as identified by interpreting radiologists from 2008 to 2016., Methods: We classified radiology reports and patient follow-up into two categories. Radiologist-Fleischner Adherence was the agreement between the radiologist's recommendation in the computed tomography report and the 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines. Clinician/Patient-Fleischner Concordance was agreement between patient follow-up and the guidelines. We calculated multivariable-adjusted predicted probabilities for factors associated with Radiologist-Fleischner Adherence and Clinician/Patient-Fleischner Concordance., Results: Among 3150 patients, 69% of radiologist recommendations were adherent to 2005 Fleischner guidelines, 4% were more aggressive, and 27% recommended less aggressive follow-up. Overall, only 48% of patients underwent follow-up concordant with 2005 Fleischner Society guidelines, 37% had less aggressive follow-up, and 15% had more aggressive follow-up. Radiologist-Fleischner Adherence was associated with Clinician/Patient-Fleischner Concordance with evidence for effect modification by health care system., Conclusion: Clinicians and patients seem to follow radiologists' recommendations but often do not obtain concordant follow-up, likely due to downstream differential processes in each health care system. Health care organizations need to develop comprehensive and rigorous tools to ensure high levels of appropriate follow-up for patients with pulmonary nodules., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Sclerotherapy is a widely used as a lifesaving therapeutic option in cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGB) due to ruptured gastro-esophageal varices (GOV) in cirrhotic patients, especially when there exists a portosystemic shunt. This endoscopic technique can entail many complications, including systemic and non-thrombotic pulmonary embolism (PE). While multiple pulmonary parenchymal manifestations have been described following sclerotherapy of GOV, to our knowledge no solitary suspicious pulmonary nodule has been described., Case Presentation: We report the case of 55-year-old man with heavy smoking history who was referred to our pulmonary clinic for work-up of a solitary pulmonary nodule. He was known to have liver cirrhosis with history of massive UGB due to rupture of GOV two months before. He was treated with sclerotherapy by injecting a 3 cc of Histoacryl/lipiodole solution. The post- endoscopic phase was unremarkable. An enhanced CT scan of chest and abdomen performed two months later showed a right upper lobe nodule, even though at that point, the patient was completely asymptomatic. This was ascribed to non-thrombotic PE secondary to sclerotherapy due to complete resolution of the nodule on a CT scan carried out at 2-month follow-up. At that point, his condition did not require any further treatment., Conclusion: Solitary pulmonary nodule is one of the radiologic manifestations of PE subsequent to sclerotherapy of GOV. Awareness and radiologic follow-up of this unusual radiologic presentation may prevent unnecessary biopsies., (Copyright © 2023 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Early detection and accurate diagnosis of pulmonary nodules are crucial for improving patient outcomes. While surgical resection of malignant nodules is still the preferred treatment option, it may not be feasible for all patients. We aimed to discuss the advances in the treatment of pulmonary nodules, especially stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and interventional pulmonology technologies, and provide a range of recommendations based on our expertise and experience., Summary: Interventional pulmonology is an increasingly important approach for the management of pulmonary nodules. While more studies are needed to fully evaluate its long-term outcomes and benefits, the available evidence suggests that this technique can provide a minimally invasive and effective alternative for treating small malignancies in selected patients. We conducted a systematic literature review in PubMed, designed a framework to include the advances in surgery, SBRT, and interventional pulmonology for the treatment of pulmonary nodules, and provided a range of recommendations based on our expertise and experience., Key Messages: As such, alternative therapeutic options such as SBRT and ablation are becoming increasingly important and viable. With recent advancements in bronchoscopy techniques, ablation via bronchoscopy has emerged as a promising option for treating pulmonary nodules. This study reviewed the advances of interventional pulmonology in the treatment of peripheral lung cancer patients that are not surgical candidates. We also discussed the challenges and limitations associated with ablation, such as the risk of complications and the potential for incomplete nodule eradication. These advancements hold great promise for improving the efficacy and safety of interventional pulmonology in treating pulmonary nodules., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Appropriate risk stratification of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) is necessary to direct diagnostic evaluation. Currently available models were developed in populations with lower cancer prevalence than that seen in thoracic surgery and pulmonology clinics and usually do not allow for missing data. We updated and expanded the Thoracic Research Evaluation and Treatment (TREAT) model into a more generalized, robust approach for lung cancer prediction in patients referred for specialty evaluation., Research Question: Can clinic-level differences in nodule evaluation be incorporated to improve lung cancer prediction accuracy in patients seeking immediate specialty evaluation compared with currently available models?, Study Design and Methods: Clinical and radiographic data on patients with IPNs from six sites (N = 1,401) were collected retrospectively and divided into groups by clinical setting: pulmonary nodule clinic (n = 374; cancer prevalence, 42%), outpatient thoracic surgery clinic (n = 553; cancer prevalence, 73%), or inpatient surgical resection (n = 474; cancer prevalence, 90%). A new prediction model was developed using a missing data-driven pattern submodel approach. Discrimination and calibration were estimated with cross-validation and were compared with the original TREAT, Mayo Clinic, Herder, and Brock models. Reclassification was assessed with bias-corrected clinical net reclassification index and reclassification plots., Results: Two-thirds of patients had missing data; nodule growth and fluorodeoxyglucose-PET scan avidity were missing most frequently. The TREAT version 2.0 mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve across missingness patterns was 0.85 compared with that of the original TREAT (0.80), Herder (0.73), Mayo Clinic (0.72), and Brock (0.68) models with improved calibration. The bias-corrected clinical net reclassification index was 0.23., Interpretation: The TREAT 2.0 model is more accurate and better calibrated for predicting lung cancer in high-risk IPNs than the Mayo, Herder, or Brock models. Nodule calculators such as TREAT 2.0 that account for varied lung cancer prevalence and that consider missing data may provide more accurate risk stratification for patients seeking evaluation at specialty nodule evaluation clinics., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: J. M. I. discloses grants from Guardant Health and GRAIL, prior support for meeting attendance from Intuitive Surgical, planned or issued patents with AstraZeneca and Roche Genentech, and stock or stock options from LumaCyte, LLC. L. T. V. has received consulting fees from Ambu A/S. F. M. receives consulting fees from Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, and Intuitive and additionally received research funding from Medtronic. The disclosures listed did not have any relation to the content of this manuscript. None declared (C. M. G., M. E. S., V. F. W., A. W. M., M. C. A., C. M., J. C., S. R., O. B. R., R. P., E. S. L., J. C. N., J. D. B., S. A. D., E. L. G.)., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Pulmonary nodules are often discovered incidentally during CT scans performed for other reasons. While the vast majority of nodules are benign, a small percentage may represent early-stage lung cancer with the potential for curative treatments. With the growing use of CT for both clinical purposes and lung cancer screening, the number of pulmonary nodules detected is expected to increase substantially. Despite well-established guidelines, many nodules do not receive proper evaluation due to a variety of factors, including inadequate coordination of care and financial and social barriers. To address this quality gap, novel approaches such as multidisciplinary nodule clinics and multidisciplinary boards may be necessary. As pulmonary nodules may indicate early-stage lung cancer, it is crucial to adopt a risk-stratified approach to identify potential lung cancers at an early stage, while minimizing the risk of harm and expense associated with over investigation of low-risk nodules. This article, authored by multiple specialists involved in nodule management, delves into the diagnostic approach to lung nodules. It covers the process of determining whether a patient requires tissue sampling or continued surveillance. Additionally, the article provides an in-depth examination of the various biopsy and therapeutic options available for malignant lung nodules. The article also emphasizes the significance of early detection in reducing lung cancer mortality, especially among high-risk populations. Furthermore, it addresses the creation of a comprehensive lung nodule program, which involves smoking cessation, lung cancer screening, and systematic evaluation and follow-up of both incidental and screen-detected nodules., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the measurement accuracy of two different computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems regarding artificial pulmonary nodules and assess the clinical impact of volumetric inaccuracies in a phantom study., Methods: In this phantom study, 59 different phantom arrangements with 326 artificial nodules (178 solid, 148 ground-glass) were scanned at 80 kV, 100 kV, and 120 kV. Four different nodule diameters were used: 5 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm. Scans were analyzed by a deep-learning (DL)-based CAD and a standard CAD system. Relative volumetric errors (RVE) of each system vs. ground truth and the relative volume difference (RVD) DL-based vs. standard CAD were calculated. The Bland-Altman method was used to define the limits of agreement (LOA). The hypothetical impact on LungRADS classification was assessed for both systems., Results: There was no difference between the three voltage groups regarding nodule volumetry. Regarding the solid nodules, the RVE of the 5-mm-, 8-mm-, 10-mm-, and 12-mm-size groups for the DL CAD/standard CAD were 12.2/2.8%, 1.3/ - 2.8%, - 3.6/1.5%, and - 12.2/ - 0.3%, respectively. The corresponding values for the ground-glass nodules (GGN) were 25.6%/81.0%, 9.0%/28.0%, 7.6/20.6%, and 6.8/21.2%. The mean RVD for solid nodules/GGN was 1.3/ - 15.2%. Regarding the LungRADS classification, 88.5% and 79.8% of all solid nodules were correctly assigned by the DL CAD and the standard CAD, respectively. 14.9% of the nodules were assigned differently between the systems., Conclusions: Patient management may be affected by the volumetric inaccuracy of the CAD systems and hence demands supervision and/or manual correction by a radiologist., Key Points: • The DL-based CAD system was more accurate in the volumetry of GGN and less accurate regarding solid nodules than the standard CAD system. • Nodule size and attenuation have an effect on the measurement accuracy of both systems; tube voltage has no effect on measurement accuracy. • Measurement inaccuracies of CAD systems can have an impact on patient management, which demands supervision by radiologists., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of pulmonary nodules using medical images has introduced new technical approaches for diagnosing and treating pulmonary nodules, and these approaches are progressively being acknowledged and adopted by physicians and patients. Nonetheless, constructing a relatively universal 3D digital model of pulmonary nodules for diagnosis and treatment is challenging due to device differences, shooting times, and nodule types. The objective of this study is to propose a new 3D digital model of pulmonary nodules that serves as a bridge between physicians and patients and is also a cutting-edge tool for pre-diagnosis and prognostic evaluation. Many AI-driven pulmonary nodule detection and recognition methods employ deep learning techniques to capture the radiological features of pulmonary nodules, and these methods can achieve a good area under-the-curve (AUC) performance. However, false positives and false negatives remain a challenge for radiologists and clinicians. The interpretation and expression of features from the perspective of pulmonary nodule classification and examination are still unsatisfactory. In this study, a method of continuous 3D reconstruction of the whole lung in horizontal and coronal positions is proposed by combining existing medical image processing technologies. Compared with other applicable methods, this method allows users to rapidly locate pulmonary nodules and identify their fundamental properties while also observing pulmonary nodules from multiple perspectives, thereby providing a more effective clinical tool for diagnosing and treating pulmonary nodules.

Pulmonary nodules are often incidentally discovered on chest imaging or from dedicated lung cancer screening. Screening adults 50 to 80 years of age who have a 20-pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit smoking within the past 15 years with low-dose computed tomography is associated with a decrease in cancer-associated mortality. Once a nodule is detected, specific radiographic and clinical features can be used in validated risk stratification models to assess the probability of malignancy and guide management. Solid pulmonary nodules less than 6 mm warrant surveillance imaging in patients at high risk, and nodules between 6 and 8 mm should be reassessed within 12 months, with the recommended interval varying by the risk of malignancy and an allowance for patient-physician decision-making. A functional assessment with positron emission tomography/computed tomography, nonsurgical biopsy, and resection should be considered for solid nodules 8 mm or greater and a high risk of malignancy. Subsolid nodules have a higher risk of cancer and should be followed with surveillance imaging for longer. Direct physician-patient communication, clinical decision support within electronic health records, and guideline-based management algorithms included in radiology reports are associated with increased compliance with existing guidelines.

Objective: To evaluate whether thoracic radiologist review of computed tomography-detected incidental pulmonary nodules initially reported by non-thoracic imagers would change management recommendations., Materials and Methods: The Radiology Consultation Service identified 468 computed tomography scans (one per patient) performed through the adult emergency department from August 2018 through December 2020 that mentioned the presence of a pulmonary nodule. Forty percent (186/468) were read by thoracic radiologists and 60% (282/468) were read by non-thoracic radiologists. The Radiology Consultation Service contacted all patients in order to assess risk factors for lung malignancy. Sixty-seven patients were excluded because they were unreachable, declined participation, or were actively followed by a pulmonologist or oncologist. A thoracic radiologist assessed the nodule and follow up recommendations in all remaining cases., Results: A total of 215 cases were re-reviewed by thoracic radiologists. The thoracic radiologist disagreed with the initial nodule recommendations in 38% (82/215) of cases and agreed in 62% (133/215) of cases. All discordant cases resulted in a change in management by the thoracic radiologist with approximately one-third (33%, 27/82) decreasing imaging utilization and two-thirds (67%, 55/82) increasing imaging utilization. Nodules were deemed benign and follow up eliminated in 11% (9/82) of discordant cases., Discussion: Our study illustrates that nodule review by thoracic radiologists results in a change in management in a large percentage of patients. Continued research is needed to determine whether subspecialty imaging review results in increased or more timely lung cancer detection., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Worldwide, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality. Much of this mortality is thought to be secondary to detection in later stages, where treatment options and survivability are limited. The goals of lung nodule evaluation are to expedite the diagnosis and treatment of patients with malignant nodules and to minimize unnecessary diagnostic procedures in those with benign nodules. However, the differentiation between benign and malignant has been challenging and is further complicated by the benefits of early diagnosis competing with potential morbidity of invasive diagnostic procedures., Recent Findings: Biomarkers have the potential to improve estimates of pretest probability of malignancy in pulmonary nodules, especially in the intermediate-risk subgroup. Four biomarkers have undergone extensive validation and are available for clinical use, and we will discuss each in this review., Summary: The application of biomarkers to lung cancer risk assessment has the potential to improve cancer probability assessments, which in turn can reduce unnecessary invasive testing and/or reduce delays in diagnosis and treatment., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Pulmonary nodules are identified in approximately 1.6 million patients per year in the US and are detected on approximately 30% of computed tomographic (CT) images of the chest. Optimal treatment of an individual with a pulmonary nodule can lead to early detection of cancer while minimizing testing for a benign nodule., Observations: At least 95% of all pulmonary nodules identified are benign, most often granulomas or intrapulmonary lymph nodes. Smaller nodules are more likely to be benign. Pulmonary nodules are categorized as small solid (<8 mm), larger solid (≥8 mm), and subsolid. Subsolid nodules are divided into ground-glass nodules (no solid component) and part-solid (both ground-glass and solid components). The probability of malignancy is less than 1% for all nodules smaller than 6 mm and 1% to 2% for nodules 6 mm to 8 mm. Nodules that are 6 mm to 8 mm can be followed with a repeat chest CT in 6 to 12 months, depending on the presence of patient risk factors and imaging characteristics associated with lung malignancy, clinical judgment about the probability of malignancy, and patient preferences. The treatment of an individual with a solid pulmonary nodule 8 mm or larger is based on the estimated probability of malignancy; the presence of patient comorbidities, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coronary artery disease; and patient preferences. Management options include surveillance imaging, defined as monitoring for nodule growth with chest CT imaging, positron emission tomography-CT imaging, nonsurgical biopsy with bronchoscopy or transthoracic needle biopsy, and surgical resection. Part-solid pulmonary nodules are managed according to the size of the solid component. Larger solid components are associated with a higher risk of malignancy. Ground-glass pulmonary nodules have a probability of malignancy of 10% to 50% when they persist beyond 3 months and are larger than 10 mm in diameter. A malignant nodule that is entirely ground glass in appearance is typically slow growing. Current bronchoscopy and transthoracic needle biopsy methods yield a sensitivity of 70% to 90% for a diagnosis of lung cancer., Conclusions and Relevance: Pulmonary nodules are identified in approximately 1.6 million people per year in the US and approximately 30% of chest CT images. The treatment of an individual with a pulmonary nodule should be guided by the probability that the nodule is malignant, safety of testing, the likelihood that additional testing will be informative, and patient preferences.

Incidental findings are common in the evaluation of surgical patients. Understanding the appropriate assessment and management of these frequent occurrences is important for the provision of comprehensive quality care. This review details the epidemiology, considerations, and recommendations for management of common incidental manifestations in surgical patients, including Meckel diverticulum, adrenal incidentaloma, thyroid nodule, solitary pulmonary nodule, small bowel intussusception, gallstones, and incidental appendectomy., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Guidelines such as the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) are available for determining when subsolid nodules should be treated within lung cancer screening programs, but they are based on expert opinion. Purpose To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of varying treatment thresholds for subsolid nodules within a lung cancer screening setting by using a simulation model. Materials and Methods A previously developed model simulated 10 million current and former smokers undergoing CT lung cancer screening who were assumed to have a ground-glass nodule (GGN) at baseline. Nodules were allowed to grow and to develop solid components over time according to a monthly cycle and lifetime horizon. Management strategies generated by varying treatment thresholds, including the solid component size and use of the Brock risk calculator, were tested. For each strategy, average U.S. costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained per patient were computed, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of those on the efficient frontier were calculated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses of results were performed by varying several relevant parameters, such as treatment costs or malignancy growth rates. Results Variants of the Lung-RADS guidelines that did not treat pure GGNs were cost-effective. Strategies based on the Brock risk calculator did not reach the efficient frontier. The strategy with the highest QALYs under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY included no treatment of GGNs and a threshold of 4-mm solid component size for treatment of subsolid nodules. This strategy yielded an ICER of $52 993 per QALY (95% CI: 44 407, 64 372). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed this was the optimal strategy under a range of parameter variations. Conclusion Treatment of pure ground-glass nodules was not cost-effective. Strategies that use modifications of the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System guidelines were cost-effective for treating part-solid nodules; an optimal threshold of 4 mm for the solid component yielded the most quality-adjusted life years. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Pulmonary nodules are the most common incidental finding in the chest, particularly on computed tomographs that include a portion or all of the chest, and may be encountered more frequently with increasing utilization of cross-sectional imaging. Established guidelines address the reporting and management of incidental pulmonary nodules, both solid and subsolid, synthesizing nodule and patient features to distinguish benign nodules from those of potential clinical consequence. Standard nodule assessment is essential for the accurate reporting of nodule size, attenuation, and morphology, all features with varying risk implications and thus management recommendations., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cancer survivors are at higher risk than the general population for development of a new primary malignancy, most commonly lung cancer. Current lung cancer screening guidelines recommend low-dose chest CT for high-risk individuals, including patients with a history of cancer and a qualifying smoking history. However, major lung cancer screening trials have inconsistently included cancer survivors, and few studies have assessed management of lung nodules in this population. This narrative review highlights relevant literature and provides expert opinion for management of pulmonary nodules detected incidentally or by screening in oncologic patients. In patients with previously treated lung cancer, a new nodule most likely represents distant metastasis from the initial lung cancer or a second primary lung cancer; CT features such as nodule size and composition should guide decisions regarding biopsy, PET/CT, and CT surveillance. In patients with extrapulmonary cancers, nodule management requires individualized risk assessment; smoking is associated with increased odds of primary lung cancer, whereas specific primary cancer types are associated with increased odds of pulmonary metastasis. Nonneoplastic causes, such as infection, medication toxicity, and postradiation or postsurgical change, should also be considered. Future prospective studies are warranted to provide evidence-based data to assist clinical decision-making in this context.

Subsolid nodules are common on chest CT imaging and may be either benign or malignant. Their varied features and broad differential diagnoses present management challenges. Although subsolid nodules often represent lung adenocarcinomas, other possibilities are common and influence management. Practice guidelines exist for subsolid nodule management for both incidentally and screening-detected nodules, incorporating patient and nodule characteristics. This review highlights the similarities and differences among these algorithms, with the intent of providing a resource for comparison and aid in choosing management options., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Percepta genomic classifier has been clinically validated as a complement to bronchoscopy for lung nodule evaluation., Research Question: The goal of this study was to examine the impact on clinical management decisions of the Percepta result in patients with low- and intermediate-risk lung nodules., Study Design and Methods: A prospective "real world" registry was instituted across 35 US centers to observe physician management of pulmonary nodules following a nondiagnostic bronchoscopy. To assess the impact on management decisions of the Percepta genomic classifier, a subset of patients was analyzed who had an inconclusive bronchoscopy for a pulmonary nodule, a Percepta result, and an adjudicated lung diagnosis with at least 1 year of follow-up. In this cohort, change in the decision to pursue additional invasive procedures following Percepta results was assessed., Results: A total of 283 patients met the study eligibility criteria. In patients with a low/intermediate risk of malignancy for whom the clinician had designated a plan for a subsequent invasive procedure, a negative Percepta result down-classified the risk of malignancy in 34.3% of cases. Of these down-classified patients, 73.9% had a change in their management plan from an invasive procedure to surveillance, and the majority avoided a procedure up to 12 months following the initial evaluation. In patients with confirmed lung cancers, the time to diagnosis was not significantly delayed when comparing Percepta down-classified patients vs patients who were not down-classified (P = .58)., Interpretation: The down-classification of nodule malignancy risk with the Percepta test decreased additional invasive procedures without a delay in time to diagnosis among those with lung cancer., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Providing guideline-concordant management of pulmonary nodules can present challenges when a patient's anxiety about cancer or fear of invasive procedures colors judgment. The way in which providers discuss and make decisions about how to evaluate a pulmonary nodule can affect patient satisfaction, distress, and adherence to evaluation. This article discusses the complexity of tailoring patient-provider communication, decision-making, and implementation of guidelines for pulmonary nodule evaluation to the individual patient, emphasizing the importance of how information is conveyed and the value of listening to and addressing patients' concerns. We summarize the relevant guideline recommendations and literature, and provide two case scenarios to illustrate a patient-centered approach to discussing and managing pulmonary nodules from our perspectives as a pulmonologist and thoracic surgeon., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Every year millions of pulmonary nodules are discovered incidentally and through lung cancer screening programs. Management of these nodules is often suboptimal, with low follow-up rates and poor provider understanding of management approaches. There is an emerging body of literature about how to optimize management of pulmonary nodules. The Pulmonary Nodule and Lung Cancer Screening Clinic (PNLCSC) at Massachusetts General Hospital was founded in 2012 to manage pulmonary nodules via a multidisciplinary approach with optimized support staff. Recommendations from clinic providers and treatment details were recorded for all patients seen at the PNLCSC. Adherence to recommendations and outcomes were also tracked and reviewed. From October 2012 to September 2019, 1,136 patients were seen at the PNLCSC, each for a mean of 1.8 appointments (range, 1-10). A total of 356 procedures were recommended by the clinic and 271 patients were referred for surgery and/or radiation. The majority of interventions (74%) were recommended at the initial PNLCSC appointment. In total, 211 patients (19%) evaluated at the PNLCSC had pathologically confirmed pulmonary malignancies or were treated empirically with radiation. Among patients followed by the clinic, the adherence rate to clinic recommendations was 95%. This study shows how a multidisciplinary approach to pulmonary nodule management can streamline care and optimize follow-up. The PNLCSC provides a template that can be replicated in other health systems. It also provides an example of how multidisciplinary approaches can be applied to other complex conditions. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This work demonstrates how an integrated, multidisciplinary approach to management of pulmonary nodules can streamline patient care and improve adherence to provider recommendations. This approach has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce health care costs., (© AlphaMed Press 2019.)

Objectives: Accurate and safe preoperative localization is useful for video-assisted thoracic surgery of small pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity (GGO). However, the optimal localization method is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness and safety of the lipiodol and hook-wire localization techniques for video-assisted thoracic surgery of GGO lesions., Methods: This prospective, non-randomized comparative study was conducted between April 2014 and December 2016 at 8 qualifying university teaching hospitals. Two-hundred-fifty patients with pulmonary lesions having GGO were included. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the lipiodol (n = 125, 4 hospitals) or hook-wire group (n = 125, 4 hospitals) for preoperative localization procedures. Participants underwent preoperative localization via the lipiodol or hook-wire technique followed by thoracoscopic surgery. The primary endpoint was the procedure success rate., Results: The procedure success rates (hook-wire vs lipiodol group) were 94.40% versus 99.16% (P = .08). Localization-related complications occurred in 53.60% versus 48.33% of patients (P = .49). Hemorrhage rates were significantly greater in the hook-wire group than in the lipiodol group (21.6% vs 5.83%, P < .001). The lipiodol procedure time was significantly longer than that of the hook-wire technique (20.69 ± 9.34 vs 17.15 ± 7.91 minutes, P = .001). The initially positive surgical resection margin was significantly greater in the hook-wire group than in the lipiodol group (10.89% vs 2.38%, P = .02)., Conclusions: There was no significant difference in success rate between the hook-wire and lipiodol methods. However, the hemorrhage rate was significantly greater in the hook-wire group, whereas the hook-wire group showed greater initially positive surgical resection margins., (Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The field of biomarker development is evolving to assist in determining benign from malignant pulmonary nodules. Although a prospective clinical utility would best to show how a biomarker affects patient treatment and outcomes, we sought to begin to understand how the results might alter management by determining how physicians would use the results of a rule-in blood test to manage pulmonary nodules., Materials and Methods: Pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons in the American College of Chest Physicians clinician database were invited to participate in an online survey. The participant demographic data were collected. Four hypothetical clinical vignettes were presented. The participants accessed the pretest probability (probability of cancer [pCA]) for malignancy and chose the management strategies as the case progressed. The management strategies chosen before and after the result of a rule-in biomarker test were compared and assessed for guideline concordance., Results: Of the 455 eligible participants who had opened the survey, 416 (92%) completed it: 332 pulmonologists and 84 thoracic surgeons. Although 91% of the participants were very comfortable managing nodules, depending on the case, 30% to 62% incorrectly assessed the pCA, with 22% to 62% overestimating the risk and 8% to 51% underestimating the risk. After a rule-in blood test result, the clinician change in management moved in the right direction in some cases but, in others, the physicians used the results incorrectly. Pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons differed in the management strategies, with surgeons recommending surgery more often., Conclusions: Although the use of biomarker testing for pulmonary nodule evaluation is promising, without proper physician education, the potential for harm exists. Clinical utility studies are needed to appropriately inform the effect of biomarker use., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: The post-imaging, mathematical predictive model was established by combining demographic and imaging characteristics with a pulmonary nodule risk score. The prediction model provides directions for the treatment of pulmonary nodules. Many studies have established predictive models for pulmonary nodules in different populations. However, the predictive factors contained in each model were significantly different. We hypothesized that applying different models to local research groups will make a difference in predicting the benign and malignant lung nodules, distinguishing between early and late lung cancers, and between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. In the present study, we compared four widely used and well-known mathematical prediction models., Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 496 patients from January 2017 to October 2019, they were diagnosed with nodules by pathological. We evaluate models' performance by viewing 425 malignant and 71 benign patients' computed tomography results. At the same time, we use the calibration curve and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve whose abbreviation is AUC to assess one model's predictive performance., Results: We find that in distinguishing the Benign and the Malignancy, Peking University People's Hospital model possessed excellent performance (AUC = 0.63), as well as differentiating between early and late lung cancers (AUC = 0.67) and identifying lung adenocarcinoma (AUC = 0.61). While in the identification of lung squamous cell carcinoma, the Veterans Affairs model performed the best (AUC = 0.69)., Conclusions: Geographic disparities are an extremely important influence factors, and which clinical features contained in the mathematical prediction model are the key to affect the precision and accuracy., (© 2020 The Author(s).)

Objectives: The aim of this study is to present the results of the Italian survey on the management of pulmonary nodules incidentally identified at computed tomography (CT)., Materials and Methods: An online electronic survey, consisting of 23 multiple-choice questions, was created using the SurveyMonkey web-based tool. The questionnaire was developed by the Board of the Italian College of Chest Radiology of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM) and by an experienced group of Italian Academic Chest Radiologists. The link to the online electronic survey was submitted by email to all the SIRM members., Results: A total of 767 radiologists, corresponding to 7.5% of all the SIRM members, participated in the online survey. The majority of participants (92%) routinely describe the attenuation of pulmonary nodules in the report, and 84.1% recommend the further follow-up, with 92.7% of respondents taking CT nodule morphological features into consideration. The 57.7% of participants adhere to the Fleischner Society guidelines for the management of incidental pulmonary nodules. However, 56.6% and 75.6% of respondents have a more cautious approach than that recommended by the guidelines and tend to use a shorter follow-up for both solid and ground-glass nodules, respectively. Finally, 94.5% of participants favor congresses and refresher courses dedicated to insights on lung nodule diagnosis and management., Conclusions: This survey demonstrates that the management of pulmonary nodules incidentally detected on CT is still complex and controversial. The majority of SIRM members express a need for an update on this topic.

Purpose of Review: We review the categorization and management of solitary pulmonary nodules., Recent Findings: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were updated in 2018 and the revised Fleischner Society guidelines were published in 2017. The revised Fleischner Society guidelines published in 2017 have less frequent follow-up recommendations for incidentally detected pulmonary nodules with longer intervals between subsequent CT scans. The updated 2018 version of National Comprehensive Cancer Network lung cancer screening guidelines provide recommendations for screen-detected nodules based on a patient's risk of cancer. New molecular assays may be of use in patients with a pretest probability of malignancy less than 50%. When these tests indicate low risk, a strategy of follow-up CT imaging may be feasible, avoiding unnecessary invasive testing. However, further clinical utility studies are needed in this area., Summary: Management options for pulmonary nodules include watchful waiting with follow-up CT imaging, PET imaging, or further invasive testing based on probability of malignancy. With a low estimated risk of malignancy in an incidentally detected solitary pulmonary nodule, longer intervals between follow-up CT scans are recommended for patients. For patients at high risk for malignancy or those with nodules of at least 8 mm, either incidentally, screen detected, or symptom driven, a diagnostic biopsy is necessary to establish the cause of a solitary pulmonary nodule.

Rationale and Objectives: To explore downstream costs associated with incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT., Materials and Methods: The cohort comprised 200 patients with an incidental pulmonary nodule on chest CT. Downstream events (chest CT, PET/CT, office visits, percutaneous biopsy, and wedge resection) were identified from the electronic medical record. The 2017 Fleischner Society Guidelines were used to classify radiologists' recommendations and ordering physician management for the nodules. Downstream costs for nodule management were estimated from national Medicare rates, and average costs were determined., Results: Average downstream cost per nodule was $393. Costs were greater when ordering physicians over-managed relative to radiologist recommendations ($940) vs. when adherent ($637) or under-managing ($166) relative to radiologists recommendations. Costs were also greater when ordering physicians over-managed relative to Fleischner Society guidelines ($860) vs. when under-managing ($208) or adherent ($292) to guidelines. Costs did not vary significantly based on whether or not radiologists recommended follow-up imaging ($167-$397), nor whether radiologists were adherent or under- or over-recommended relative to Fleischner Society guidelines ($313-$444). Costs were also higher in older patients, patients with a smoking history, and larger nodules. Five nodules underwent wedge resection and diagnosed as malignancies. No patient demonstrated recurrence or metastasis. Average cost per diagnosed malignancy was $3090., Conclusion: Downstream costs for incidental pulmonary nodules are highly variable and particularly high when ordering physicians over-manage relative to radiologist recommendations and Fleischner Society guidelines. To reduce unnecessary utilization and cost from over-management, radiologists may need to assume a greater role in partnering with ordering physicians to ensure appropriate, guideline-adherent, and follow-up testing., (Copyright © 2018 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical significance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules at diagnosis (defined as ≤ 4 pulmonary nodules < 5 mm or 1 nodule measuring ≥ 5 and < 10 mm) in patients with pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS)., Patients and Methods: We selected patients with supposed nonmetastatic RMS treated in large pediatric oncology centers in the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and the Netherlands, who were enrolled in the European Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (E pSSG) RMS 2005 study. Patients included in the current study received a diagnosis between September 2005 and December 2013, and had chest computed tomography scans available for review that were done at time of diagnosis. Local radiologists were asked to review the chest computed tomography scans for the presence of pulmonary nodules and to record their findings on a standardized case report form. In the E pSSG RMS 2005 Study, patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules were treated identically to patients without pulmonary nodules, enabling us to compare event-free survival and overall survival between groups by log-rank test., Results: In total, 316 patients were included; 67 patients (21.2%) had indeterminate pulmonary nodules on imaging and 249 patients (78.8%) had no pulmonary nodules evident at diagnosis. Median follow-up for survivors (n = 258) was 75.1 months; respective 5-year event-free survival and overall survival rates (95% CI) were 77.0% (64.8% to 85.5%) and 82.0% (69.7% to 89.6%) for patients with indeterminate nodules and 73.2% (67.1% to 78.3%) and 80.8% (75.1% to 85.3%) for patients without nodules at diagnosis ( P = .68 and .76, respectively)., Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that indeterminate pulmonary nodules at diagnosis do not affect outcome in patients with otherwise localized RMS. There is no need to biopsy or upstage patients with RMS who have indeterminate pulmonary nodules at diagnosis.

The solitary pulmonary nodule represents a common diagnostic challenge for clinicians. While most are benign, a significant number represent early, potentially curable lung cancers. With the increased utilisation of chest computed tomography, solitary pulmonary nodules are increasingly being identified and with lung cancer screening programmes now on the horizon globally, it is crucial clinicians are familiar with the evaluation and management of solitary pulmonary nodules. Through the evaluation of patient risk factors combined with computed tomography characteristics of solitary pulmonary nodules, including size, growth rate, margin characteristics, calcification, density and location; a clinician can assess the risk of malignancy. This article provides an up to date review of the imaging features of both benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules to assist in the identification of nodules that require histological confirmation or ongoing surveillance. In addition, we summarise the newly updated Fleischner Society Guidelines that provide clinicians with a framework for the evaluation and management of solitary pulmonary nodules., (© 2019 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of computed tomography (CT)-guided synchronous percutaneous core-needle biopsy and microwave ablation (MWA) for highly suspicious malignant pulmonary nodules., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated medical records of 54 consecutive patients (mean age, 65.5 ± 11.2 years) with 62 highly suspicious malignant pulmonary nodules who synchronously underwent percutaneous core-needle biopsy and MWA via a coaxial cannula (Group A) or sequentially underwent these procedures (Group B) from September 2016 to November 2017. All patients were followed up for at least 6 months after MWA. The safety and feasibility of synchronous core-needle biopsy and MWA were analyzed by comparing clinical data, technical success rate, complication, and curative effect per nodule with those of sequential procedures., Results: Technical success rates were 100% in both groups. The pneumothorax rate was 29.6% (8/27) in Group A and 57.1% (20/35) in Group B, which was statistically different (P = 0.031). In Group A, hemoptysis and pleural effusion rates were 22.2% (6/27), and in Group B, the corresponding rates were 28.6% (10/35) and 20.0% (7/35), respectively. No postprocedural pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysm, bronchopleural fistula, or needle-tract tumor seeding developed in both groups. After 6 months' follow-up, the effective rates (complete + partial response) in both groups were 100%., Conclusions: Synchronous core-needle biopsy and MWA via a coaxial cannula is technically safe and feasible in the management of highly suspicious malignant pulmonary nodules, and this procedure has lesser complications and similar effects (both 100% effective treatment) compared with sequential procedures., Competing Interests: None

It is well known that lung cancer can manifest itself in imaging as solid and subsolid nodules or masses. However, in this era of increased computed tomography use another morphological computed tomography appearance of lung cancer is increasingly being recognised, presenting as a malignancy in relation to cystic airspaces. Despite the fact that it seems to be a relatively common finding in daily practice, literature on this entity is scarce and presumably the overall awareness is limited. This can lead to misinterpretation and delay in diagnosis and, therefore, increased awareness is urgently needed. This review aims to illustrate the imaging appearances of cyst-related primary lung malignancies, demonstrate its mimickers and potential pitfalls, and discuss the clinical implications based on the available literature and our own experience in four different hospitals., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: O.M. Mets reports personal fees (as an expert panel member) from Aidence, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C.M. Schaefer-Prokop has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.A. de Jong has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©ERS 2018.)

With the rising number of screening and incidentally detected lung nodules, there is an increasing need for evaluation in the safest and least invasive manner. The last two decades have seen substantial evolution in bronchoscopic approaches to diagnose these nodules. Innovative bronchoscopic techniques, often used in conjunction with each other, have significantly improved our ability to navigate to almost any part of the lung. A comprehensive knowledge of available technologies and the factors affecting diagnostic yield is essential to decide on the best way to approach a particular scenario. This article provides an overview of the technical aspects, yield, and limitations of these modalities., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Rationale: Pulmonary involvement occurs in about 90% of patients with sarcoidosis. However, delayed diagnosis sometimes occurs due to atypical thoracic imaging findings., Patient Concerns: A 52-year-old woman presented with recurrent uveitis and fever of unknown origin. She had been admitted to the hospital due to fever, but its cause was not determined., Diagnoses: Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed a solitary pulmonary nodule and an enlarged right axillary lymph node. The nodule had showed an interval growth from 0.7 cm to 1.1 cm over 18 months, when compared to the previous chest CT. Mosaic attenuation was also observed., Interventions: The patient underwent thoracoscopic wedge resection of the nodule and excisional biopsy of the enlarged lymph node to exclude malignancy and non-caseating granulomas consistent with sarcoidosis was confirmed., Outcomes: Medical treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine was administered. Fever and uveitis no longer recurred after 6 months of medication. We demonstrated that sarcoidosis shows only atypical pulmonary imaging findings, with an enlarged solitary nodule, an axillary lymphadenopathy, and mosaic attenuation, mimicking a malignancy., Lessons: Awareness on atypical CT manifestations that are correlated with pathologic findings may be helpful for early diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

Backgrounds: Chest low-dose CT screening (LDCTS) has been finding unprecedented numbers of peripheral non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) at an early stage and increased the number of patients with surgical indication. It is important to explore the influence of preoperative watchful-waiting time (WWT) on surgical outcomes. Objective is to clarify relationship between WWT and surgical outcomes of LDCTS-finding NSCLC from the view point of treatment delay., Methods: Total 283 cases of NSCLC, found by LDCTS and consecutively resected, were surveyed for preoperative WWT and surgical outcomes. Validity of the present guideline for management of pulmonary nodules detected by LDCTS was verified whether WWT before surgery was suitable for eradication of NSCLC., Results: The median value of WWT was 4.0 months in total, and the distribution of WWT exhibited long-tail-type pattern. That was 5.0 months in the group of pure ground-glass nodule (pGGN), 4.0 months in the group of part-solid nodule (PSN), and 1.7 months in the group of solid nodule (SON). During long-term postoperative observation time (median 79 months), 10-year progression-free survival rates were 100% in pGGN, 96% in PSN, and 72% in SON (P < .0001). They decreased significantly depending on enlargement of size: 91% or higher in size of 2 cm or smaller, and 71% or lower in size of larger than 2 cm (P < .0001)., Conclusions: Limited to LDCTS-finding nodules, surgical outcome will depend mainly on some malignant potential of NSCLC per se, rather than on duration of WWT or treatment delay.

Incidentally detected lung nodules are increasingly common in routine diagnostic computed tomography (CT) imaging. Formal management recommendations for incidental nodules, such as those outlined by the Fleischner Society, must therefore reflect a balance of malignancy risk and the clinical context in which nodules are discovered. Nodule size, attenuation, morphology, and location all influence the likelihood of malignancy and, thus, the necessity and timing of follow-up according to current Fleischner recommendations. As technological advancements in CT imaging continue, there may be greater reliance on advanced computerized analysis of lung nodule features to help determine the risk of clinically significant disease., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale and Objectives: The optimal management of large pulmonary nodules, at higher risk for lung cancer, has not been determined, and it remains unclear as to which patients should undergo follow-up imaging vs invasive tissue diagnosis via biopsy or surgical resection., Materials and Methods: Through search of radiology reports, 86 nodules from our institution were identified using the inclusion criterion of solid nodules measuring greater than 8mm. We evaluated these nodules with a number of risk prediction calculators, including the Brock University model, and compared these against the proven diagnosis., Results: Of 86 nodules, 59 (69%) nodules were malignant. The most accurate predictive model, the Brock University calculator, underestimated the risk for this group at 33%. At its optimal threshold, this model had a positive predictive value of 81% and negative predictive value of 53%. Notwithstanding the low negative predictive value, the positive predictive value was no better than patients clinically selected for biopsy (86% of biopsies were malignant)., Conclusion: Existing nodule risk prediction calculators are of limited usage in guiding the management of large pulmonary nodules. At present, the accuracy of these models in this setting is inferior to expert clinical judgment, and future work is needed to develop management algorithms for higher-risk nodules., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The incidence of indeterminate pulmonary nodules has risen constantly over the past few years. Determination of lung nodule malignancy is pivotal, because the early diagnosis of lung cancer could lead to a definitive intervention. According to the current international guidelines, size and growth rate represent the main indicators to determine the nature of a pulmonary nodule. However, there are some limitations in evaluating and characterising nodules when only their dimensions are taken into account. There is no single method for measuring nodules, and intrinsic errors, which can determine variations in nodule measurement and in growth assessment, do exist when performing measurements either manually or with automated or semi-automated methods. When considering subsolid nodules the presence and size of a solid component is the major determinant of malignancy and nodule management, as reported in the latest guidelines. Nevertheless, other nodule morphological characteristics have been associated with an increased risk of malignancy. In addition, the clinical context should not be overlooked in determining the probability of malignancy. Predictive models have been proposed as a potential means to overcome the limitations of a sized-based assessment of the malignancy risk for indeterminate pulmonary nodules., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (Copyright ©ERS 2017.)

Rationale: Patient participation in medical decision-making is widely advocated, but outcomes are inconsistent., Objectives: We examined the associations between medical decision-making roles, and patients' perceptions of their care and knowledge while undergoing pulmonary nodule surveillance., Methods: The study setting was an academically affiliated Veterans Affairs hospital network in which 121 participants had 319 decision-making encounters. The Control Preferences Scale was used to assess patients' decision-making roles. Associations between decision-making, including role concordance (i.e., agreement between patients' preferred and actual roles), shared decision-making (SDM), and perceptions of care and knowledge, were assessed using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations., Results: Participants had a preferred role in 98% of encounters, and most desired an active role (shared or patient controlled). For some encounters (36%), patients did not report their actual decision-making role, because they did not know what their role was. Role concordance and SDM occurred in 56% and 26% of encounters, respectively. Role concordance was associated with greater satisfaction with medical care (adjusted odds ratio [Adj-OR], 5.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-17.26), higher quality of patient-reported care (Adj-OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.31-6.27), and more disagreement that care could be better (Adj-OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.12-4.16). Role concordance was not associated with improved pulmonary nodule knowledge with respect to lung cancer risk (Adj-OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.63-2.00) or nodule information received (Adj-OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.31-4.13). SDM was not associated with perceptions of care or knowledge., Conclusions: Among patients undergoing longitudinal nodule surveillance, a majority had a preference for having active roles in decision-making. Interestingly, during some encounters, patients did not know what their role was or that a decision was being made. Role concordance was associated with greater patient-reported satisfaction and quality of medical care, but not with improved knowledge. Patient participation in decision-making may influence perceptions of care; however, clinicians may need to focus on other communication strategies or domains to improve patient knowledge and health outcomes.

Primary care physicians (PCPs) may be involved in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) detected through lung cancer screening. Little is known about their perspectives on the management or the referral of SPN. Using the American Medical Association's Physician Masterfile, we randomly surveyed 1384 PCPs between January and October 2015 with an 18% response rate. A subset analysis was performed on SPN management and referral practices of PCP. These results and those relating to practice characteristics were compared between family practice and internal medicine physicians. Responders and nonresponders did not differ by demographic characteristics. A total of 137 (55.5%) PCPs reported feeling confident in managing the workup of imaging-detected SPN. However, only 53 PCPs (21.3%) were inclined to manage the evaluation and follow-up of SPN. There was no significant difference between family practice and internal medicine physicians with regard to years in practice, size of practice, or referral to specialists. Family practitioners and internists similarly disagreed or were neutral to self-managing SPN (P = 0.60). Internists were twice as likely to express confidence as family practitioners (odds ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.09-3.48). Among all PCPs, 75.4% would refer management of these patients to a pulmonologist, 28.9% to a surgeon, and 24.2% to an oncologist. Confidence did not predict lung cancer screening practices. Although more than half of PCPs expressed confidence in the workup of SPN, most preferred referral to specialists. Additional research is needed to understand barriers to PCP management of incidental SPN in the effort to facilitate lung cancer screening., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: and purpose of the study: The frequency of lung nodules in the head and neck cancer population is unknown, currently the only guidance available recommends following local policy. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of pulmonary nodules in our head and neck cancer group and interpret the recently updated British Thoracic Society (BTS) Lung Nodule Guidelines in a head and neck cancer setting., Methods: 100 patients were diagnosed with head and neck cancer between July 2013-March 2014, clinico-pathological, demographic and radiological data was extracted from the electronic records. Images with lung findings were re-reviewed by a single consultant radiologist for patients with lung pathology on the initial staging CT report., Results: Twenty patients (20%) had discreet pulmonary findings on CT. Eleven (11%) had lung nodules, 6 (6%) had lesions suspicious for metastasis and 3 (3%) had co-incidental bronchogenic primary cancers. These patients were re-imaged between 6 and 18 months and in 1 patient the previously identified 7 mm nodule had progressed to 16 mm at 1 year. There was no set follow up imaging protocol used., Conclusion: The MDT in NHS Lothian has reviewed the BTS guidance and now has a local policy for the management of lung nodules in head and neck cancer patients. Lung Nodules in the head and neck cancer population are common >10%. Higher risk patients with larger nodules should be risk assessed with validated assessment tools. PET-CT has a place in the assessment of lung nodules when risk of malignancy is high., (Copyright © 2016 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Context: - Optimal management of the patient with a solitary pulmonary nodule entails early diagnosis and appropriate treatment for patients with malignant tumors, and minimization of unnecessary interventions and procedures for those with ultimately benign nodules. With the growing number of high-resolution imaging modalities and studies available, incidentally found solitary pulmonary nodules are an increasingly common occurrence., Objective: - To provide guidance to clinicians involved in the management of patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule, including aspects of risk stratification, workup, diagnosis, and management., Data Sources: - Data for this review were gathered from an extensive literature review on the topic., Conclusions: - Logical evaluation and management pathways for a patient with a solitary pulmonary nodule will allow providers to diagnose and treat individuals with early stage lung cancer and minimize morbidity from invasive procedures for patients with benign lesions.

Definition: Intrapulmonary nodules generally represent an incidental finding in the roentgenogram or computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest. They are defined as single, well-circumscribed, radiographic opaque lesions that measures up to 3 cm in diameter and are surrounded completely by aerated lung. The probability of malignancy directly correlates with increasing diameter. Lesions that have a diameter of 1 cm or larger require direct evaluation., Therapy: Surgery is the first option for patients with a malignant lesion, given an acceptable perioperative risk; for high-risk patients either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) should be offered. In these cases the malignant histology has to be established beforehand or verified by radiologic proven growth., Outcome: Complete surgical resection is superior to RFA and SBRT with respect to local tumor control.