Search

Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate the prevalence of undiagnosed iron deficiency in patients with endometriosis., Methods: We performed a multi-center, cross-sectional study at two tertiary care hospitals. We included 251 non-pregnant women (18-50 years old) presenting with a clinical or surgical diagnosis of symptomatic endometriosis. Patients who consented to the study underwent screening bloodwork (including complete blood count, ferritin, and transferrin saturation) and completed the study survey assessing demographics, medical and surgical history, and validated questionnaires to assess iron deficiency and endometriosis symptoms., Results: The prevalence of iron deficiency in our endometriosis cohort was 53.4% (134/251), and the prevalence of iron deficiency anemia was 13.5% (34/251). Patients with iron deficiency were more likely to have heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) compared with patients without iron deficiency (66/133, 49.6% vs. 40/115, 34.8%, p = 0.022). Nonetheless, 58% (142/251) of our study population did not endorse HMB. Despite absence of HMB, 47% (67/142) of these patients were iron-deficient. Transferrin saturation was diagnostic for iron deficiency in 63 of 176 patients (35.7%) who had a normal ferritin (≥30 ng/mL). Patients with iron deficiency had a significantly lower adjusted median Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Subscale score compared with those without iron deficiency (26.3. vs. 29.8, p = 0.025)., Conclusion: This study highlights the high prevalence of iron deficiency, which remains undiagnosed in over half of patients with endometriosis presenting to a gynecologist. Future research should focus on assessing the effectiveness of iron therapy in improving symptoms and overall well-being in this population., (© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Background: For patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis (NMDARE) and ovarian teratoma, "conservative" surgical approaches (complete or partial unilateral oophorectomy or bilateral partial oophorectomies) are associated with clinical improvement. "Aggressive" ovarian resections (complete bilateral oophorectomy or "blind" ovarian resections without pre-operative evidence of teratoma) are also reported, although the evidence supporting these approaches is unclear., Objective: To compare the one-year functional outcomes of patients with NMDARE who underwent conservative vs. aggressive ovarian resections., Methods: Patients with NMDARE undergoing ovarian resection between January 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2021 were retrospectively identified from three North American tertiary care centers. Primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 one year after ovarian resection. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare demographic features, disease characteristics, and functional outcomes between the two surgical groups. A fixed-effects meta-analysis of studies reporting functional outcomes based on surgical approach was also performed., Results: Twenty-three patients were included. Eight underwent aggressive surgical management. There was a non-significant trend toward an association between aggressive surgical management and younger age-at-onset, higher baseline disease severity, and longer delays to treatment. There was no difference between "aggressive" (3/8, 38%) and "conservative" (11/15, 73%) management groups in achieving the primary outcome (OR 95% = <0.1-1.9; p = 0.18). Findings were similar when considering data from 52 patients in two published studies (RR = 0.74; CI 95% = 0.48-1.13; p = 0.16)., Conclusions: Aggressive ovarian resection was not associated with improved outcomes in patients with NMDARE in this series. Group differences may have contributed, recognizing that patients who underwent aggressive resection tended to be sicker, with procedures performed later in the disease course. Based on available evidence, we advocate for function-sparing resection in patients with imaging-confirmed/suspected teratoma, and repeated multi-modal imaging in at-risk patients with NMDARE refractory to conventional treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Iyengar, Hébert, Climans, Muccilli, Lee, Boruah, Thakur, Solnik, Wennberg, Day and Tang-Wai.)

Objective: To estimate the incidence and risk factors for bowel injury in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications from 2012 to 2016 at institutes participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including both inpatient and outpatient settings. Bowel injury was identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes as patients who underwent bowel repair at the time of hysterectomy or postoperatively within 30 days. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to control for patient clinical factors and perioperative factors., Results: Bowel injury occurred in 610 of 155,557 (0.39%) included women. After bivariate analysis, factors associated with bowel injury included age, race, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, increased operative time, surgical approach, type of hysterectomy, lysis of adhesions, and operative indication. After adjusting for potential confounders, bowel injury was found associated with older age, surgical indication of endometriosis, and abdominal surgical approach. Compared with the surgical indication of endometriosis (n=63/10,625), the surgical indications of menstrual disorder (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.47; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.48; n=67/34,168), uterine leiomyomas (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.61-1.05; aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.59; n=243/51,232), and genital prolapse (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.20-0.45; aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.25-0.67; n=36/20,384) were each associated with lower odds of bowel injury. Compared with the vaginal approach to hysterectomy (n=27/27,434), the abdominal approach was found to have significantly increased odds of bowel injury (OR 10.80, 95% CI 7.31-15.95; aOR 10.49 95% CI 6.42-17.12; n=401/38,106); the laparoscopic approach had smaller but significantly increased odds (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.37-3.08; aOR 2.03 95% CI 1.24-3.34; n=182/90,017) as well., Conclusion: Increased risk of bowel injury is associated with endometriosis and the abdominal surgical approach to hysterectomy. These findings have implications for the surgical care of women with benign uterine disease.

Objective: To assess the value of a faculty and resident medical education development program., Study Design: Modules on Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies and evaluation, teaching methods, and Residency Review Committee guidelines were created, beta tested, and installed on a website. Pretests and posttests were developed. Faculty and residents were required to complete the course. At initiation and 6 months after training, residents completed a feedback perception survey. Statistical analysis was performed using Student t test. P < .05 was considered significant., Results: Forty-nine voluntary faculty members and residents completed the course. The posttest scores on all the ACGME competencies were significantly higher than the pretest scores (P < .05). The results of the residents' survey indicated that the educational development program significantly improved their perceptions of corrective and immediate feedback by faculty., Conclusion: A formal Internet-based program significantly increases short-term cognitive knowledge about the ACGME competencies among participants and improves trainees' perceptions of the quality of faculty feedback up to 6 months after training.