Search

Objectives To explore differences in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) clinical phenotype around the world in a large sample of patients included in the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS). Method IMAS was a cross-sectional online survey (2017–2022) of 5557 unselected axSpA patients from 27 countries. We analysed across five geographic regions the age at symptom onset, diagnostic delay, gender, HLA-B27, family history, extra-musculoskeletal manifestations, presence of comorbidities, disease activity (BASDAI), level of spinal stiffness and treatments. Results Of 5557 IMAS participants, 3493 were from Europe, 770 from North America, 600 from Asia, 548 from Latin America and 146 from South Africa. Age at symptom onset ranged between 25 and 30 years and was higher in Latin America. Diagnostic delay was longest in South Africa and lowest in Asia. The lowest HLA-B27 positivity was observed in Latin America and the highest in Asia. Extra-musculoskeletal manifestations were the lowest in Europe. Mean disease activity (BASDAI) was 5.4, with highest values in South Africa and lowest in Asia. Most of the patients had used NSAIDs for their condition and less than half had ever taken conventional synthetic DMARDS; both were more frequent in Latin America and South Africa. Almost half of the patients had ever taken biologic DMARDs, more frequent use being in the Americas. Conclusion There is great heterogeneity of axSpA clinical phenotype presentation around the world. AxSpA manifests differently in different regions, so further understanding of these differences of phenotypes is needed to achieve early diagnosis and initiation of optimal disease treatment in axSpA in the different regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of comorbidities among patients with ax-SpA in the general population and to evaluate the impact of these comorbidities on the functional status and quality of life. Methods: Patients with ax-SpA fulfilling the modified New York 1984 criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and/or Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 2009 criteria for patients with ax-SpA belonging to the ESPAXIA cohort ("Estudio de eSPondiloartritis Axial Irep Argentina") were included. Data regarding sociodemographics, comorbidities, and disease characteristics were recorded. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics using the student t-test, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact test. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: In total, 86 patients were included, 80% were males with a median age of 46 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 32-58) and a median disease duration of 19 years (IQR: 13-31). The most frequent comorbidities reported were hypertension (26.7%), gastritis (25.6%), dyslipidemia (24.4%), gallstone (12.8%), nephrolithiasis (11.6%), anemia (10.5%), hypothyroidism (7%), and type 2 diabetes (6%). The prevalence of these comorbidities in patients with ax-SpA was similar to that observed in the general population, with the exception of a higher frequency of nephrolithiasis among patients with ax-SpA (11.6% in ax-SpA vs 3.96% in the general population). We further categorized the study population into three groups: patients with no comorbidities, those with 1 or 2 comorbidities, and those with =3 comorbidities. The presence of =3 comorbidities was associated with older age, longer disease duration, worse disease activity, functional status, and quality of life as compared with the patients without comorbidities. In multivariate analysis, older age was the only variable independently associated with the presence of comorbidities. Conclusion: The frequency of comorbidities in the ax-SpA cohort was high, and the only variable associated with a higher prevalence of comorbidities was older age. Nephrolithiasis was more frequent in the patients with ax-SpA than that reported in the general population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess diagnostic delay and its associated factors globally, in a large sample of patients included in the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS)., Methods: IMAS is a cross-sectional online survey (2017-2022) of 5,557 axSpA patients from 27 countries. Diagnostic delay was calculated as the difference between age at diagnosis and age at first symptom onset reported by patients. Associations between diagnostic delay and regions, sociodemographic characteristics, as well as disease-related factors were explored through univariable and multivariable linear regression analysis., Results: Data from 5,327 patients who reported data on diagnostic delay in IMAS survey were analysed: 3,294 were from Europe, 752 from North America, 590 from Asia, 545 from Latin America, and 146 from Africa. Overall, patients reported a mean diagnostic delay of 7.4 years (median: 4.0) since symptom onset, with substantial variation across regions; being the highest delay in South Africa and the lowest in Asia. The variables associated with longer diagnostic delay in the final multivariable regression model were: younger age at symptom onset (b=-0.100), female gender (b = 2.274), being diagnosed by rheumatologist (b = 1.163), greater number of HCPs seen before diagnosis (b = 1.033), and history of uveitis (b = 1.286)., Conclusion: In this global sample of axSpA patients, the mean diagnostic delay was 7.4 years, and showed significant differences across regions. Younger age at symptom onset, female gender, diagnosis made by a rheumatologist, greater number of HCPs seen before diagnosis, and the history of uveitis were the parameters associated with a longer diagnostic delay in axSpA patients., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: This study aims to establish expert consensus recommendations for clinical information on imaging requests in suspected/known axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), focusing on enhancing diagnostic clarity and patient care through guidelines., Materials and Methods: A specialised task force was formed, comprising 7 radiologists, 11 rheumatologists from the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) and a patient representative. Using the Delphi method, two rounds of surveys were conducted among ASAS members. These surveys aimed to identify critical elements for imaging referrals and to refine these elements for practical application. The task force deliberated on the survey outcomes and proposed a set of recommendations, which were then presented to the ASAS community for a decisive vote., Results: The collaborative effort resulted in a set of six detailed recommendations for clinicians involved in requesting imaging for patients with suspected or known axSpA. These recommendations cover crucial areas, including clinical features indicative of axSpA, clinical features, mechanical factors, past imaging data, potential contraindications for specific imaging modalities or contrast media and detailed reasons for the examination, including differential diagnoses. Garnering support from 73% of voting ASAS members, these recommendations represent a consensus on optimising imaging request protocols in axSpA., Conclusion: The ASAS recommendations offer comprehensive guidance for rheumatologists in requesting imaging for axSpA, aiming to standardise requesting practices. By improving the precision and relevance of imaging requests, these guidelines should enhance the clinical impact of radiology reports, facilitate accurate diagnosis and consequently improve the management of patients with axSpA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TD: speakers bureau: Canon MS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB; consultant: Lilly; grant/research support: Canon MS. CG: speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim. VN-C: has received speakers fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma; consultant of AbbVie, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma; grant/research support from AbbVie and Novartis. IE: speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis. HH: speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD, Janssen, Roche, Sobi and Pfizer, consultant of Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, MSD, AbbVie, Novartis and Sobi. PMM: honoraria from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Orphazyme, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript, and is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University College London Hospitals (UCLH), Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). WM: speaking: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB consultant: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB grants: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. HM-O: research grants from Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, honoraria/speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and UCB. MØ: speaker fees: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi and UCB. XB: consultant: AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB; grant/research support: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis and UCB. MRu: speaker fees from and/or advisor for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, UCB. KGH: speaker fees from Novartis, MSD and Pfizer. Consulting for AbbVie and Calyx. Co-founder of BerlinFlame. SJP: speaking fees from MSD, Pfizer, AbbVie, UCB, Novartis; consulting fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, UCB, Novartis and research support from AbbVie, MSD and Novartis. MRe: ISS grant; ASAS consultant. RGWL: consultant: Calyx, CARE Arthritis, Image Analysis Group. UW: speaker fees: Novartis, Eli Lilly. AGJ: none for this article. MdH: speaker fees from UBC. FAS: speaker fees: Novartis, Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ on behalf of EULAR.)

Background: Combined therapy constitutes the standard of care in RA. Jak inhibitors (Jaki) have shown efficacy in monotherapy, a modality used in cases where it is not possible to use Disease-Modifying Anti Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs)., Objectives: To estimate the prevalence (total and by drug), reason for using and the increase over the time of bDMARDs or tsDMARDs as monotherapy after the availability of the Jaki. To analyze the differential characteristics between patients with monotherapy vs combined therapy., Methods: Cross-sectional multicenter study. Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of RA (ACR/EULAR 2010) under treatment with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs started from 2013 were included. Socio-demographic, clinic, and therapeutic data were collected., Results: A total of 505 RA patients were included. Since 2013, the prevalence of monotherapy usage was (any) 49%. The drugs used as monotherapy were Jaki in 41% and TNF-blockers in 30%. The leading causes of monotherapy use were intolerance/adverse events (62%), medical decision or lack of adherence (37.7%). The highest socioeconomic level and a better functional status at diagnosis were predictors of monotherapy use. The use of the second line of treatments and less polypharmacy were independent factors associated with this therapeutic modality., Conclusions: The current prevalence of monotherapy in RA was 49%, the Jaki were the most used drug in this modality. Monotherapy increases from year to year. There are differential characteristics in patients using monotherapy.