1. Identifying dimensions of fatigue in haemodialysis important to patients, caregivers and health professionals: An international survey
- Author
-
Sara N. Davison, Michael J. Germain, Emma O'Lone, Gregorio T. Obrador, Juan Dapueto, Song-Hd Initiative, Allison Tong, Jonathan C. Craig, Angela Ju, Mary Amanda Dew, Donal O'Donoghue, Martin Howell, Jenny I. Shen, Richard Fluck, Sarbjit V. Jassal, and Mark Unruh
- Subjects
Gerontology ,Adult ,Male ,Health Personnel ,030232 urology & nephrology ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Severity of Illness Index ,Likert scale ,03 medical and health sciences ,Young Adult ,0302 clinical medicine ,Renal Dialysis ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,Patient Reported Outcome Measures ,Fatigue ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Health professionals ,business.industry ,International survey ,Outcome measures ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Caregivers ,Nephrology ,Scale (social sciences) ,Female ,business - Abstract
Background Patient-reported outcome measures of fatigue used in research in haemodialysis vary widely in the dimensions assessed; and the importance of these dimensions to patients and health professionals is unknown. This study aimed to identify the most important dimensions of fatigue to assess in patients on haemodialysis participating in trials. Methods In an international survey, patients/caregivers and health professionals rated the absolute and relative importance of content and measurement dimensions to include in a core outcome measure of fatigue. A 9-point Likert scale (7-9 indicating critical importance) was used to assess absolute importance and best-worst scale was used to assess importance of each dimension compared to others. Results In total, 169 patients/caregivers and 336 health professionals from 60 countries completed the survey. Both groups (patients/caregivers and health professionals) rated life participation (7.55), tiredness (7.40), level of energy (7.37), ability to think clearly (7.15), post-dialysis fatigue (7.13), motivation (7.03) and ability to concentrate (7.03) as critically important (mean Likert score greater than 7) content dimensions to include in a core outcome measure. Compared to patients and caregivers, health professionals rated post-dialysis fatigue, memory and verbal abilities more highly. Based on the relative importance scores, life participation was ranked most highly above all content dimensions. Severity was rated and ranked the most important measurement dimension by all stakeholders. Conclusion A core outcome measure of fatigue should assess impact of fatigue on life participation, tiredness and level of energy, using a severity scale. A consistent and valid measurement of fatigue will improve the value of trials in supporting decision-making based on this important outcome.
- Published
- 2019