Search

Futibatinib, a selective, irreversible fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-4 inhibitor, is being investigated for tumors harboring FGFR aberrations and was recently approved for the treatment of FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In vitro studies identified cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A as the major CYP isoform in futibatinib metabolism and indicated that futibatinib is likely a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate and inhibitor. Futibatinib also showed time-dependent inhibition of CYP3A in vitro. Phase I studies investigated the drug-drug interactions of futibatinib with itraconazole (a dual P-gp and strong CYP3A inhibitor), rifampin (a dual P-gp and strong CYP3A inducer), or midazolam (a sensitive CYP3A substrate) in healthy adult participants. Compared with futibatinib alone, coadministration of futibatinib with itraconazole increased futibatinib mean peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve by 51% and 41%, respectively, and coadministration of futibatinib with rifampin lowered futibatinib mean peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve by 53% and 64%, respectively. Coadministration of midazolam with futibatinib had no effect on midazolam pharmacokinetics compared with midazolam administered alone. These findings suggest that concomitant use of dual P-gp and strong CYP3A inhibitors/inducers with futibatinib should be avoided, but futibatinib can be concomitantly administered with other drugs metabolized by CYP3A. Drug-drug interaction studies with P-gp-specific substrates and inhibitors are planned., (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Futibatinib, a selective, irreversible fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-4 inhibitor, was recently approved for FGFR2 rearrangement-positive cholangiocarcinoma. This Phase I study evaluated the mass balance and metabolic profile of 14 C-futibatinib single oral 20-mg dose in healthy participants (n = 6). Futibatinib was rapidly absorbed; median time to peak drug concentration was 1.0 hours. The mean elimination half-life in plasma was 2.3 hours for futibatinib, and 11.9 hours for total radioactivity. Mean recovery of total radioactivity was 70% of the dose, with 64% recovered in feces and 6% in urine. The major excretion route was fecal; negligible levels were excreted as parent futibatinib. Futibatinib was the most abundant plasma component, comprising 59% of circulating radioactivity (CRA). The most abundant metabolites were cysteinylglycine-conjugated futibatinib in plasma (13% CRA) and reduction of desmethyl futibatinib in feces (17% of dose). In human hepatocytes, 14 C-futibatinib metabolites included glucuronide and sulfate of desmethyl futibatinib, whose formation was inhibited by 1-aminobenzotriazole (a pan-cytochrome P450 inhibitor), and glutathione- and cysteine-conjugated futibatinib. These data indicate the primary metabolic pathways of futibatinib are O-desmethylation and glutathione conjugation, with cytochrome P450 enzyme-mediated desmethylation as the main oxidation pathway. 14 C-futibatinib was well tolerated in this Phase 1 study., (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Futibatinib, an oral, irreversible fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-4 inhibitor, is being evaluated for FGFR-aberrant tumors. Two open-label phase 1 studies evaluated the effects of high-fat, high-calorie food and concomitant proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; lansoprazole) on single-dose futibatinib (20 mg) pharmacokinetics and safety in healthy adults. In the food effect study (N  =  17), subjects received futibatinib under fed and fasted conditions, separated by a 7-day washout. In the PPI study (N  =  20), subjects received futibatinib alone, underwent a 2-day washout, and then received lansoprazole 60 mg once daily for 5 days, with futibatinib also administered on day 5. Under fed versus fasted conditions, futibatinib bioavailability was 11.2% lower (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity geometric mean ratio 88.8%; 90% confidence interval, 79.8%-98.9%), and median time to maximum plasma concentration was significantly delayed (4.0 vs 1.5 hours; P < .0001). There were no significant differences in futibatinib exposure between futibatinib plus lansoprazole and futibatinib alone. No serious adverse events occurred in either study. These findings suggest that food and PPIs are unlikely to have clinically meaningful impacts on futibatinib bioavailability. Thus, futibatinib may be used with or without food and concomitantly with acid-reducing agents., (© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Futibatinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-4 inhibitor, is being investigated for FGFR-aberrant tumors. A 4-period, crossover, phase 1 thorough QT/QTc study compared effects on Fridericia heart rate-corrected QT (QTcF) interval of single doses of futibatinib 20 and 80 mg (therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses, respectively), placebo, and moxifloxacin (positive control) in healthy subjects. The study objective was to assess the time-matched difference in change from baseline in QTcF (ddQTcF) between futibatinib and placebo. In addition, changes from baseline in QTcF and other electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, pharmacokinetics, ECG morphology, and safety were assessed. Forty-eight subjects were randomized. ddQTcF upper limits of 2-sided 90%CIs remained <10 milliseconds (clinical threshold) for both futibatinib doses at all time points (range, 2.0-4.5 milliseconds). Assay sensitivity was demonstrated by lower limits of 2-sided 97.5%CIs of the dQTcF difference between moxifloxacin and placebo of >5 milliseconds. Futibatinib exposure increased in a dose-dependent manner, and no significant relationship was detected between plasma futibatinib concentration and ddQTcF. There were no significant effects on heart rate, other ECG parameters, or ECG morphology. No serious adverse events occurred. Futibatinib did not prolong QTcF or affect other cardiac measures at therapeutic or supratherapeutic doses., (© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

In vitro data support involvement of cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C8 and CYP3A4 in the metabolism of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor brigatinib. A 3-arm, open-label, randomized, single-dose, fixed-sequence crossover study was conducted to characterize the effects of the strong inhibitors gemfibrozil (of CYP2C8) and itraconazole (of CYP3A) and the strong inducer rifampin (of CYP3A) on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of brigatinib. Healthy subjects (n = 20 per arm) were administered a single dose of brigatinib (90 mg, arms 1 and 2; 180 mg, arm 3) alone in treatment period 1 and coadministered with multiple doses of gemfibrozil 600 mg twice daily (BID; arm 1), itraconazole 200 mg BID (arm 2), or rifampin 600 mg daily (QD; arm 3) in period 2. Compared with brigatinib alone, coadministration of gemfibrozil with brigatinib did not meaningfully affect brigatinib area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC 0-inf ; geometric least-squares mean [LSM] ratio [90%CI], 0.88 [0.83-0.94]). Coadministration of itraconazole with brigatinib increased AUC 0-inf (geometric LSM ratio [90%CI], 2.01 [1.84-2.20]). Coadministration of rifampin with brigatinib substantially reduced AUC 0-inf (geometric LSM ratio [90%CI], 0.20 [0.18-0.21]) compared with brigatinib alone. The treatments were generally tolerated. Based on these results, strong CYP3A inhibitors and inducers should be avoided during brigatinib treatment. If concomitant use of a strong CYP3A inhibitor is unavoidable, the results of this study support a dose reduction of brigatinib by approximately 50%. Furthermore, CYP2C8 is not a meaningful determinant of brigatinib clearance, and no dose modifications are needed during coadministration of brigatinib with CYP2C8 inhibitors., (© 2019 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, received accelerated approval in the United States for the treatment of patients with metastatic ALK + non-small-cell lung cancer who have progressed on or are intolerant to crizotinib. A clinical study was conducted to assess the effect of food on brigatinib pharmacokinetics (PK). Healthy subjects received a single oral dose of brigatinib 180 mg (2 × 90-mg tablets) after a 10-hour fast or after a high-fat meal in a 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study. Plasma samples for PK characterization were collected over 168 hours postdose. Twenty-four subjects were enrolled (mean age 44 years; 58% male), with 21 included in the PK-evaluable population. Brigatinib peak concentration was reduced by 13% under fed (high-fat meal) versus fasted conditions, with no effect on area under the concentration-time curve. The median time to peak concentration of brigatinib was longer under fed conditions (5 hours) than in fasted conditions (2 hours). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar under fasted (48%) and fed (46%) conditions and were of mild intensity. Consumption of a high-fat meal decreased the rate of brigatinib oral absorption but had no impact on the extent of absorption, thereby supporting brigatinib administration without regard to meals. These recommendations are reflected in the US prescribing information for brigatinib., (© 2018 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Ponatinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with significant activity in heavily pretreated patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, is a CYP3A4 substrate. This open-label, nonrandomized, fixed-order crossover study evaluated the effect of multiple oral doses of rifampin, a strong CYP3A4 inducer, on the pharmacokinetics of ponatinib (45 mg, single dose). Twenty healthy adults received ponatinib on day 1, rifampin 600 mg alone on days 8-13, 15, and 16, and rifampin 600 mg with ponatinib on day 14. Rifampin decreased maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to time of last measurable concentration (AUC0-t ) and from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) of ponatinib by 42%, 59%, and 63%, respectively, with no effect on time to Cmax . The limits of the 90% confidence intervals of the estimated geometric mean ratios of ponatinib Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-∞ did not fall within the 80-125% margins for equivalence, suggesting a statistically significant interaction. Coadministration of ponatinib with strong CYP3A4 inducers should be avoided unless the benefit outweighs the possible risk of ponatinib underexposure, because the safety of ponatinib dose increases has not been studied in this context., (© 2015, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Bosutinib is an orally bioavailable dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor and a CYP3A4 enzyme substrate. This study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of bosutinib when coadministered with the CYP3A4 inducer rifampin in 24 healthy men., Methods: Subjects received single oral doses of bosutinib 500 mg (Days 1 and 14) and once-daily oral doses of rifampin 600 mg (Days 8-17); serial blood samples were analyzed., Results: Bosutinib exposures were reduced following concomitant administration of rifampin vs. bosutinib alone, measured by peak plasma concentration (C(max); 112 vs. 16.0 ng/mL; 86% reduction), total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; 2740 vs. 207 ng·h/mL; 92% reduction), and AUC to the last measurable concentration at time T (2440 vs. 158 ng·h/mL; 94% reduction). Median time to C(max) and mean half-life were shorter for bosutinib plus rifampin vs. single-agent bosutinib. Oral clearance increased approximately 13-fold; the volume of distribution increased from 9560 to 72,900 L. Treatment-emergent adverse events appeared less frequently with bosutinib plus rifampin (59%) vs. single-agent bosutinib (79%); diarrhea was reported in 11 (46%) vs. 4 (18%) subjects, respectively., Conclusions: Concomitant use of potent or moderate CYP3A inducers with bosutinib should be avoided because of the effects of drug-drug interaction observed between bosutinib and rifampin.

Background: In vitro studies have demonstrated that the aqueous solubility of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib decreases as pH increases., Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to assess the effects of the gastric proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics of ponatinib. The single-dose safety profile of ponatinib with and without coadministration of lansoprazole was also characterized., Methods: This was a phase I, open-label, non-randomized, two-period crossover study in 20 healthy subjects aged 18-55 years. Subjects received a single oral dose of ponatinib 45 mg alone on day 1, an oral dose of lansoprazole 60 mg on day 14, and ponatinib 45 mg plus lansoprazole 60 mg on day 15., Results: Lansoprazole coadministration resulted in a 1-h increase in the time to maximum plasma concentration (t max) of ponatinib (6 vs. 5 h post-dose; P < 0.001). A corresponding 25 % decrease in the geometric mean maximum plasma concentration (C max) of ponatinib was observed for ponatinib + lansoprazole versus ponatinib alone (40.67 vs. 53.96 ng/mL). Importantly, lansoprazole did not decrease the overall ponatinib systemic exposure as assessed by the ponatinib area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞ 1,153 ng·h/mL for lansoprazole + ponatinib vs. 1,222 ng·h/mL for ponatinib alone). The safety profile was considered acceptable when ponatinib was administered alone or with lansoprazole., Conclusions: Although coadministration of lansoprazole led to a modest, albeit statistically significant, reduction in ponatinib C max, overall systemic exposure to ponatinib did not change. The findings suggest that no dose adjustment is necessary when ponatinib is administered with drugs that increase gastric pH.

Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of chronic hepatic impairment on the single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib., Methods: Subjects (n = 16) had Child-Pugh class A (mild, n = 6), B (moderate, n = 6), or C (severe, n = 4) hepatic impairment and were matched with healthy controls (n = 8). Each subject received a single oral dose of ponatinib 30 mg under fasting conditions, and PK parameters were assessed in blood samples collected through 96 h post-dose., Results: Ponatinib maximum plasma concentrations (C max) were observed after 5-6 h in Child-Pugh A, Child-Pugh B, and healthy subjects, and after ~3 h in Child-Pugh C subjects. The estimated % geometric mean ratios for C max, area under the plasma concentration-time curves from time zero to last observation (AUC0-t ) and to infinity (AUC0-∞) suggested a slightly lower exposure in Child-Pugh B (61.4, 89.1, and 90.6%, respectively) and Child-Pugh C subjects (62.8, 77.1, and 79.4%) versus healthy subjects. Child-Pugh A subjects had similar estimated % geometric mean ratio for C max (106.7%), and slightly greater estimated % geometric mean ratios for AUC0-t (133.0%) and AUC0-∞ (122.8%), versus healthy subjects. Mean elimination half-life was extended in subjects with hepatic impairment (43-47 vs 36 h). Ponatinib was generally well tolerated. A single serious AE (pancreatitis) in the Child-Pugh C group resolved with treatment., Discussion: As no major differences in ponatinib single-dose PK were observed in patients with hepatic impairment versus healthy subjects, a reduction of ponatinib starting dose in these patients is not necessary, but caution is recommended when administering ponatinib to these patients.

What Is Known and Objective: Ponatinib is a potent oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against BCR-ABL, the primary driver of chronic myeloid leukaemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. This single-centre, single-dose, randomized, open-label, three-period crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a single oral dose of ponatinib (45-mg tablet) under fasting conditions and following consumption of high- and low-fat meals by healthy subjects., Methods: Subjects were randomly assigned to one of the six possible treatment sequences, each evaluating three ponatinib 45-mg treatments: administered under fasting conditions; administered after a high-fat meal; or administered after a standardized low-fat meal. The high-fat meal derived approximately 50% of its total caloric content from fat, with approximately 150, 250 and 500-600 calories derived from protein, carbohydrates and fat, respectively (total of approximately 900-1000 calories). The standardized low-fat meal derived no more than 20% of total caloric content from fat, with approximately 56, 428 and 63 calories derived from protein, carbohydrates and fat, respectively (total of approximately 547 calories). During each of the three treatment periods, blood samples were collected predose and at 13 time points over the 96-h post-dose interval. Plasma concentrations of ponatinib were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Mixed-model analyses of variance (anova) were performed on natural log-transformed PK parameters Cmax and AUC0-∞., Results and Discussion: Geometric mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) values for the fasted, low-fat and high-fat regimens were 54·7, 51·6 and 51·5 ng/mL, respectively. Geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) values for the fasted, low-fat and high-fat regimens were 1273, 1244 and 1392 h × ng/mL, respectively. All limits of the 90% CIs of the estimated geometric mean ratios for Cmax and all AUC comparisons fell within the 80%-125% margins. These results indicate that consumption of a high- or low-fat meal within 30 min prior to administration of ponatinib had no effect on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of ponatinib., What Is New and Conclusion: Food does not affect the single-dose pharmacokinetics of ponatinib. These data demonstrate that ponatinib may be administered with or without food., (© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Ponatinib is a BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in patients resistant or intolerant to prior TKIs. In vitro studies suggested that metabolism of ponatinib is partially mediated by CYP3A4. The effects of CYP3A4 inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of ponatinib and its CYP3A4-mediated metabolite, AP24567, were evaluated in a single-center, randomized, two-period, two-sequence crossover study in healthy volunteers. Subjects (N = 22) received two single doses (orally) of ponatinib 15 mg, once given alone and once coadministered with daily (5 days) ketoconazole 400 mg, a CYP3A4 inhibitor. Ponatinib plus ketoconazole increased ponatinib maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) compared with ponatinib alone. The estimated mean ratios for AUC0-∞, AUC0-t, and C(max) indicated increased exposures to ponatinib of 78%, 70%, and 47%, respectively; exposure to AP24567 decreased by 71%. Exposure to AP24567 was marginal after ponatinib alone (no more than 4% of the exposure to ponatinib). These results suggest that caution should be exercised with the concurrent use of ponatinib and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and that a ponatinib dose decrease to 30 mg daily, from the 45 mg daily starting dose, could be considered., (© 2013 ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Bosutinib is an orally bioavailable, dual Src and Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in the USA for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia following development of resistance or intolerance to prior therapy. In vitro studies demonstrated that bosutinib displays pH-dependent aqueous solubility, suggesting that concomitant administration of agents that alter gastric pH could affect bosutinib absorption., Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of lansoprazole, a gastric proton pump inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics and safety of bosutinib., Methods: This open-label, non-randomized, phase I study involved inpatients and outpatients at a single site. The study participants were healthy men or women of non-childbearing potential aged 18-50 years. Each subject received bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1, lansoprazole 60 mg on Day 14, and bosutinib 400 mg co-administered with lansoprazole 60 mg on Day 15 under fasting conditions. The main outcome measure was the effect of multiple doses of lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetic profile of a single oral dose of bosutinib., Results: A total of 24 healthy male subjects were enrolled. Co-administration with lansoprazole decreased the mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of bosutinib from 70.2 to 42.9 ng/mL, and the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 1,940 to 1,470 ng·h/mL. Log-transformed bosutinib pharmacokinetic parameters indicated significant between-treatment differences; the least squares geometric mean ratio for C(max) was 54 % (95 % CI 42-70) and for AUC was 74 % (95 % CI 60-90). Mean apparent total body clearance from plasma after oral administration increased from 237 to 330 L/h, and the median time to reach Cmax increased from 5 to 6 h, although this change may be related to decreased bosutinib absorption when combined with lansoprazole. When co-administered with lansoprazole, bosutinib maintained an acceptable safety profile, which was primarily characterized by diarrhea (33 %), headache (21 %), and nausea (13 %). One subject experienced serious adverse events of diverticulitis, gastritis, and duodenitis after co-administration; however, no participant withdrew because of toxicity., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that bosutinib absorption may be reduced when co-administered with lansoprazole or other proton pump inhibitors. Caution should be used with such drug combinations, as subtherapeutic exposure of bosutinib may limit its clinical antitumor activity; short-acting antacids are recommended instead.

Purpose: Cardiac dysfunction, particularly QT interval prolongation, has been observed with tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved to treat chronic myeloid leukemia. This study examines the effects of ponatinib on cardiac repolarization in patients with refractory hematological malignancies enrolled in a phase 1 trial., Methods: Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were collected at 3 dose levels (30, 45, and 60 mg) at 6 time points. Electrocardiographic parameters, including QTc interval, were measured, and 11 morphological analyses were conducted. Central tendency analyses of ECG parameters were performed using time-point and time-averaged approaches. All patients with at least 2 baseline ECGs and 1 on-treatment ECG were included in the analyses. Patients with paired ECGs and plasma samples were included in the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis to examine the relationship between ponatinib plasma concentration and change from baseline in QT intervals., Results: Thirty-nine patients at the 30-, 45-, and 60-mg dose levels were included in the central tendency and morphological analyses. There was no significant effect on cardiac repolarization, as evidenced by non-clinically significant mean QTcF changes from baseline of -10.9, -3.6, and -5.0 ms for the 30-, 45-, and 60-mg dose levels, respectively. The morphological analysis revealed 2 patients with atrial fibrillation and 2 with T wave inversion. Seventy-five patients were included in the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis across all dose levels. The slope of the relationship for QTcF versus plasma ponatinib concentration was not positive (-0.0171), indicating no exposure-effect relationship., Conclusions: Ponatinib is associated with a low risk of QTc prolongation in patients with refractory hematological malignancies.

Purpose: Bosutinib, a dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor in development for treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia, is primarily metabolized by the CYP3A4 hepatic enzyme. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of bosutinib in patients with chronic hepatic impairment and matched healthy subjects., Methods: Hepatically impaired patients were aged 18-65 years and of Child-Pugh classes A, B, or C; healthy subjects were matched by age, sex, body mass index, and smoking habits. A single oral dose of bosutinib 200 mg was administered on day 1 within 5 min after completion of breakfast., Results: Compared with healthy subjects (n = 9), maximal plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the curve increased 2.42-fold and 2.25-fold in Child-Pugh A (n = 6), 1.99-fold and 2.0-fold in Child-Pugh B (n = 6), and 1.52-fold and 1.91-fold in Child-Pugh C patients (n = 6). Time to C(max) decreased from 4 h in healthy subjects to 2.5, 2.0, and 1.5 h in Child-Pugh A, B, and C patients, respectively; the elimination half-life increased from 55 h in healthy subjects to 86, 113, and 111 h in Child-Pugh A, B, and C patients. Bosutinib oral clearance was lower in hepatically impaired patients compared with healthy subjects. Frequently reported adverse events included prolonged QTc interval (37.0%, n = 10), nausea (11.1%, n = 3), and vomiting (7.4%, n = 2)., Conclusions: A single oral dose of bosutinib 200 mg showed acceptable tolerability in healthy subjects and in patients with mild, moderate, or severe chronic hepatic impairment.

Background: Bosutinib (SKI-606) is an orally bioavailable, competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively targets both Src and Abl tyrosine kinases. Bosutinib is metabolized primarily through the cytochrome P450 3A4 pathway. Inhibition of bosutinib metabolism by coadministration with the potent cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole could potentially increase plasma concentrations of bosutinib, allowing for the study of bosutinib tolerability at supratherapeutic concentrations in a healthy subject population., Objective: This study assessed the safety profile, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of different dose combinations of bosutinib coadministered with ketoconazole in healthy adults, and determined whether supratherapeutic concentrations of bosutinib can be achieved with ketoconazole., Methods: This was a randomized, Phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential-group study conducted in healthy adults. Single oral doses of bosutinib 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 mg or placebo were administered with ketoconazole and food on day 1; daily single oral doses of ketoconazole 400 mg were administered on days -1 and 1 through 4., Results: Forty-eight subjects were enrolled. Their mean (SD) age was 32.0 (10.7) years (range, 18-50 years). The majority of the subjects (n = 44 [92%]) were white, 2 (4%) were black or African American, and 2 (4%) were of other races. Bosutinib was associated with acceptable tolerability at doses from 100 to 600 mg, with adverse events either mild (n = 30 [63%]) or moderate (n = 12 [25%]) in severity; no subject discontinued treatment due to adverse events, and no serious events were reported. Mean (SD) values for bosutinib 100 to 600 mg ranged from 58.4 (13.3) to 426 (100) ng/mL for C(max) and 2980 (802) to 23,000 (4020) ng·h/mL for AUC(0-∞); mean AUC(0-24) and AUC(0-last) ranged from 876 (234) to 7080 (1640) ng· h/mL and from 2740 (854) to 22,200 (3630) ng · h/mL, respectively. C(max) and AUC were linear and dose proportional. Mean C(max) at 600 mg was 2.1-fold higher than the steady-state C(max) previously observed for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia who received bosutinib 500 mg once daily with food., Conclusions: Single doses of bosutinib up to 600 mg coadministered with multiple doses of ketoconazole were acceptably well tolerated in this small, selected group of healthy male volunteers. In addition, supratherapeutic exposure was achieved within this range for bosutinib when coadministered with ketoconazole. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00777530., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations of bosutinib, a dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, on the corrected QT interval (QTc) in 60 healthy adults were assessed, according to ICH-E14 guidelines, in this 2-part, randomized, single-dose, double-blind, crossover, placebo- and open-label moxifloxacin-controlled study. Subjects received placebo, moxifloxacin and bosutinib 500 mg with food (therapeutic) in Part 1. In Part 2, subjects received placebo and bosutinib 500 mg plus ketoconazole (supratherapeutic). ANOVA compared baseline-adjusted QTc for bosutinib with placebo; and bosutinib plus ketoconazole with placebo plus ketoconazole. Primary endpoint was population-specific QT correction (QTcN). Secondary endpoints were Bazett QT correction (QTcB), Fridericia's formula QT correction (QTcF) and individual QT correction (QTcI). Upper bounds for 90% confidence intervals were <10 msec for the mean change in QTcN from placebo at all postdose time points, suggesting that mean therapeutic exposures (C(max) , 114 ng/mL; AUC, 2,330 ng · h/mL) and mean supratherapeutic exposures (C(max) , 326 ng/mL; AUC, 15,200 ng · h/mL) were not associated with QTc changes. Similar results were obtained for QTcB, QTcF and QTcI. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship was observed between bosutinib concentrations and QTc. No subjects had QTcB, QTcF, QTcI or QTcN >450 msec or change from baseline >30 msec. In summary, therapeutic and supratherapeutic bosutinib exposures are not associated with QTc prolongation in healthy adults., (Copyright © 2011 UICC.)

Purpose: Neratinib, a potent, low-molecular-weight, orally administered, irreversible, pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor has antitumor activity in ErbB2 + breast cancer. The objective of this study was to characterize the onset, severity, and duration of diarrhea after administration of neratinib 240 mg once daily (QD) and 120 mg twice daily (BID) for ≤14 days in healthy subjects., Methods: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, inpatient study was conducted in 50 subjects given oral neratinib either 240 mg QD or 120 mg BID with food for ≤14 days. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with diarrhea of at least moderate severity (grade 2; 5-7 loose stools/day). In subjects with grade 2 diarrhea, fecal analytes were determined. Pharmacokinetic profiles were characterized for neratinib on Days 1 and 7., Results: No severe (grade 3) diarrhea was reported. By Day 4, all subjects had grade 1 diarrhea. Grade 2 diarrhea occurred in 11/22 evaluable subjects (50 % [90 % confidence interval (CI): 28-72 %]) in the QD group and 17/23 evaluable subjects (74 % [90 % CI: 52-90 %]) in the BID group (P = 0.130). In fecal analyses, 18 % tested positive for hemoglobin and 46 % revealed fecal lactoferrin. Specimen pH was neutral to slightly alkaline. In pharmacokinetic analyses, Day 1 peak plasma concentration and Day 7 steady-state exposure were higher with the QD regimen than the BID regimen. In an exploratory analysis, ABCG2 genotype showed no correlation with severity or onset of diarrhea., Conclusions: Incidences and onsets of at least grade 1 and at least grade 2 diarrhea were not improved on BID dosing compared with QD dosing.

Purpose: Temsirolimus, a selective inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, is an approved treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study assessed the effect of intravenous (i.v.) temsirolimus 25 mg, the recommended dose for patients with RCC, on the corrected QT (QTc) interval., Methods: This 3-period crossover study enrolled healthy subjects. In periods 1 and 2, subjects received i.v. placebo either alone or with open-label oral moxifloxacin. In period 3, subjects received a single dose of temsirolimus 25 mg. The primary statistical objective was to estimate the effect of temsirolimus compared with placebo on change from time-matched baseline QTc at the end of infusion (0.5 h). Assay sensitivity was evaluated by the effect of moxifloxacin on change from time-matched baseline QTc compared with placebo., Results: In total, 58 subjects were enrolled. Temsirolimus had no effect on QTc interval in the primary analysis. At 11 of 12 secondary time points, the upper bound for the temsirolimus QTc 90% confidence intervals for the time-matched change from baseline difference from placebo was <10 ms, with no evidence of QTc trends or relationship to concentrations of temsirolimus or its major metabolite, sirolimus. Moxifloxacin, the positive control, produced a significant increase in the QTc interval compared with placebo 0.5-4 h post-dose (P < 0.0001). No subject had a QTc interval exceeding 450 ms or a change from baseline of >30 ms., Conclusions: Therapeutic exposure to temsirolimus is not associated with clinically significant changes in QTc intervals in healthy adults.

Bosutinib (SKI-606), a dual inhibitor of Src and Abl tyrosine kinases, is being developed for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. The effect of coadministration of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of bosutinib was evaluated in an open-label, randomized, 2-period, crossover study. Healthy subjects (fasting) received a single dose of oral bosutinib 100 mg alone and with multiple once-daily doses of oral ketoconazole 400 mg. PK sampling occurred through 96 hours. The least square geometric mean treatment ratios (90% confidence interval [CI]) of C(max(bosutinib+ketoconazole))/C(max(bosutinib alone)), AUC(T(bosutinib+ketoconazole))/AUC(T(bosutinib alone)), and AUC((bosutinib+ketoconazole))/AUC((bosutinib alone)) were assessed. Compared with bosutinib administered alone, coadministration with ketoconazole increased bosutinib C(max) 5.2-fold, AUC(T) 7.6-fold, and AUC 8.6-fold. Ketoconazole coadministration decreased the mean apparent clearance of bosutinib approximately 9-fold and increased the mean (SD) terminal half-life from 46.2 (16.4) hours to 69.0 (29.1) hours. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable between the 2 treatments. The most common AEs were headache, nausea, and increased blood creatinine. No safety-related discontinuations or serious AEs occurred. These PK results indicate that bosutinib is susceptible to interaction with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Aim: The primary objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of neratinib, a potent, low-molecular-weight, orally administered, irreversible pan-ErbB (ErbB-1, -2, -4) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, during co-administration with ketoconazole, a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor., Methods: This was an open-label, randomized, two-period, crossover study. Fasting healthy adults received a single oral dose of neratinib 240 mg alone and with multiple oral doses of ketoconazole 400 mg. Blood samples were collected up to 72 h after each neratinib dose. Plasma concentration data were analyzed using a noncompartmental method. The least square geometric mean ratios [90% confidence interval (CI)] of C(max) (neratinib+ketoconazole): C(max) (neratinib alone), and AUC(neratinib+ketoconazole): AUC(neratinib alone) were assessed., Results: Twenty-four subjects were enrolled. Compared with neratinib administered alone, co-administration of ketoconazole increased neratinib C(max) by 3.2-fold (90% CI: 2.4, 4.3) and AUC by 4.8-fold (3.6, 6.5). Median t(max) was 6.0 h with both regimens. Ketoconazole decreased mean apparent oral clearance of neratinib from 346 lh(-1) to 87.1 lh(-1) and increased mean elimination half-life from 11.7 h to 18.0 h. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the two regimens (50% neratinib alone, 65% co-administration with ketoconazole)., Conclusion: Co-administration of neratinib with ketoconazole, a potent CYP3A inhibitor, increased neratinib C(max) by 3.2-fold and AUC by 4.8-fold compared with administration of neratinib alone. These results indicate that neratinib is a substrate of CYP3A and is susceptible to interaction with potent CYP3A inhibitors and, thus, dose adjustments may be needed if neratinib is administered with such compounds., (© 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Purpose: Neratinib is an orally administered, small-molecule, irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor in development for the treatment of ErbB2-positive breast cancer. This study assessed the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic neratinib concentrations on cardiac repolarization, in accordance with current regulatory guidance., Experimental Design: This was a two-part study in healthy subjects. In part 1, subjects were randomized to receive placebo, 400 mg moxifloxacin, or 240 mg neratinib (therapeutic dose) following a high-fat meal. In part 2, after a washout period, subjects received placebo plus 400 mg ketoconazole or 240 mg neratinib plus ketoconazole (supratherapeutic dose). ANOVA was used to compare the baseline-adjusted QTc interval for neratinib with that of placebo (reference), and for neratinib plus ketoconazole with that of placebo plus ketoconazole (reference). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses and categorical summaries of interval data were done. Assay sensitivity was evaluated by the effect of moxifloxacin on QTc compared with placebo., Results: Sixty healthy subjects were enrolled in this study. The upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval for baseline-adjusted QTcN (population-specific corrected QT) were 450 milliseconds or change from baseline >30 milliseconds. Moxifloxacin produced a significant increase in QTcN compared with placebo (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Therapeutic and supratherapeutic plasma concentrations of neratinib do not prolong the QTc interval in healthy subjects., ((c) 2010 AACR.)

Temsirolimus, a highly specific inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), is a novel anticancer targeted therapy with a new mechanism of action. The prototype mTOR inhibitor, oral rapamycin, is poorly soluble and undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism, leading to low and potentially variable absorption and exposure. For some tumors, maximizing the bioavailability and dose intensity via intravenous (IV) administration may provide optimal clinical benefit. Temsirolimus is an ester analog of rapamycin that retains its potent intrinsic mTOR inhibitory activity while exhibiting better solubility for IV formulation. In the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, temsirolimus is administered as a 30- to 60-minute IV infusion once weekly at a flat dose of 25 mg. This dosage results in high peak temsirolimus concentrations and limited immunosuppressive activity. Because temsirolimus is active and well tolerated, different dosages and schedules are being explored for other solid and hematologic malignancies, including mantle cell lymphoma. Temsirolimus exhibits a high volume of distribution that, together with IV administration, leads to extensive distribution into peripheral tissues. In addition, significant and protracted exposures are attained with sirolimus (rapamycin), the major equipotent metabolite of temsirolimus. Whereas temsirolimus and sirolimus are both metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, drug interaction studies with agents that induce or inhibit CYP3A4 activity indicate that exposure to the sirolimus metabolite is somewhat sensitive to pharmacokinetic (PK) drug interaction. Therefore, temsirolimus dose adjustments are warranted if coadministration cannot be avoided. Despite its complexity, the PK profile of IV temsirolimus is well characterized in cancer patients and provides a strong basis for its future study as a monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents.

Purpose: BMS-214662 is a nonsedating benzodiazepine derivative that exhibits broad spectrum cytotoxicity against human solid tumor cell lines and potently inhibits farnesylation of the H-ras and K-ras oncogenic proteins. This report describes the initial Phase I clinical trial of the compound. The main objective of the study was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities and the maximum tolerated dose of BMS-214662 when administered as a single dose i.v. over 1 h every 21 days to patients with advanced solid tumors., Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid tumors and adequate organ function were eligible for the study. The dose was escalated according to a modified Fibonacci schedule after evaluating groups of at least three patients for toxicity during the first cycle of therapy at each dose level. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed after administration of the two initial doses., Results: The dose of BMS-214662 was escalated from 36 to 225 mg/m(2) through 5 intermediate dose levels in a total of 44 patients. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 3 of the 13 (23%) patients during the first cycle of treatment with 225 mg/m(2), consisting of grade 3 nausea/vomiting in 2 patients and grade 3 diarrhea in another patient. In addition, four of these patients experienced reversible grade 3 transaminitis, which was not considered to be dose-limiting. At the recommended dose for Phase II studies, 200 mg/m(2), the most common side effects were reversible transaminitis, nausea, and vomiting. Although there were no objective responses, one patient with pancreatic cancer continues to receive treatment more than 3.5 years after entering the study. BMS-214662 exhibited linear pharmacokinetics and had a mean biological half-life of 1.55 +/- 0.27 h and a total body clearance of 21.8 +/- 10.8 liters/h/m(2), with a low apparent volume of distribution at steady state (31.5 +/- 12.9 liters/m(2)). In patients treated with the recommended Phase II dose, the mean maximum plasma concentration of the drug was 6.57 +/- 2.94 microg/ml, and farnesyltransferase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells decreased to a nadir of 10.5 +/- 6.4% of baseline at the end of the infusion but fully recovered within 24 h., Conclusions: BMS-214662 can be delivered safely as a single 1-h i.v. infusion at a dose that results in pronounced inhibition of farnesyltransferase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. However, the duration of enzyme inhibition was transient, recovering in parallel with the decline in plasma concentrations of this rapidly eliminated drug. Because indications of anticancer activity were observed in several patients, further optimization of the administration schedule for this promising new compound is warranted.

Purpose: BMS-275291 is a novel broad-spectrum inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs) rationally designed to spare a class of closely related metalloproteinases known as sheddases. Inadvertent sheddase inhibition is hypothesized to play a role in the dose-limiting joint toxicities occurring with hydroxamate-based MMP inhibitors. This trial was conducted to establish the recommended phase II dose; determine safety, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of BMS-275291; and to assess potential markers of sheddase activity [tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) release and TNFalpha-RII shedding]., Experimental Design: This was an open label, single arm, phase I study conducted at two centers. Patients with advanced or metastatic cancer were treated with once-daily oral BMS-275291 at doses escalating from 600 to 2400 mg/day. Six to eight patients/dose level were to be studied with the recommended phase II dose level expanded to a total of 15 patients. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1, 15, and 29 at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h after dosing. Radiological tumor assessment was performed every 8 weeks., Results: Forty-four evaluable patients were enrolled in this study with the most frequent tumor types being colorectal cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Dose limiting toxicities were observed at 600 mg/day (one of eight patients with grade 3 transaminitis) and at 1200 mg/day (1 of 15 patients with grade 3 rash and grade 4 shortness of breath), both in the context of predisposing conditions. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred at 900, 1800, or 2400 mg/day. The most frequent adverse events considered possibly, probably, or definitely drug-related were joint toxicity (myalgia/arthralgia), rash, fatigue, headache, nausea, and taste change, all of which were mild, grade 1, grade 2, and not dose-limiting. No objective tumor responses were observed. Twelve of forty-four patients received treatment for 4+ months, six for 8+ months, three for >1 year. Desired trough levels of parent BMS-275291 were maintained with once daily dosing. The mean plasma concentration of parent BMS-275291 at trough exceeded the calculated in vitro IC(80) value for MMP-2 and IC(90) value for MMP-9 at the recommended phase II dose of 1200 mg/day. No major changes in serum concentrations of sheddase enzymatic products, TNFalpha or TNFalpha-RII, were observed., Conclusions: BMS-275291 is a nonhydroxamate MMP inhibitor with a novel mercaptoacyl zinc-binding group. In this study, plasma concentrations of BMS-275291 continuously exceeded in vitro MMP IC(50) values without dose-limiting joint toxicity. In this refractory patient population, a suggestion of disease stabilization was observed in 12 patients. On the basis of preclinical, clinical, and pharmacokinetic data, the recommended phase II dose for future study is 1200 mg/day.

Purpose: The epothilones are a novel class of nontaxane microtubule-stabilizing agents. BMS-247550 is a semisynthetic analog of the natural product epothilone B. We conducted a phase I study administering BMS-247550 as a 1-hour intravenous infusion daily for 5 consecutive days every 21 days., Patients and Methods: Twenty-one patients received BMS-247550 without filgrastim in the first cycle. An additional six patients were enrolled at a starting dose of 8 mg/m2/d with filgrastim support. Twenty-one of the 27 patients had received prior paclitaxel, docetaxel, or both., Results: One hundred seven cycles were administered to 27 patients. The maximum-tolerated dose was 6 mg/m2 of BMS-247550 administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion daily for 5 consecutive days every 21 days. Dose-limiting toxicity at a dose of 8 mg/m2/d was neutropenia with or without filgrastim support. Nonhematologic grade 3 toxicities included fatigue (seven cycles), stomatitis (two cycles), and anorexia (one cycle). The mean terminal half-life of BMS-247550 was 16.8 +/- 6.0 hours, the volume of distribution at steady-state was 798 +/- 375 L, and the clearance was 712 +/- 247 mL/min. Objective responses were observed in patients with breast, cervical, and basal cell cancer. Reductions in CA-125 levels were noted in patients with ovarian cancer., Conclusion: The recommended phase II dose of BMS-247550 on the daily schedule for 5 days is 6 mg/m2/d. Neutropenia was dose limiting, but higher doses were tolerated by a large fraction of patients with filgrastim support. Peripheral neuropathy was mild, even after multiple cycles of therapy, and was not dose limiting.

The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the timecourse and dose response of microtubule bundle formationin peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and to correlate these data with BMS-247550 pharmacokinetics. The data presented here were obtained from 17 patients enrolled in a Phase I trial who received five dose levels of BMS-247550 (7.4-59.2 mg/m(2)), given as a 1-h infusion once every 3 weeks. Plasma drug exposure or area under the curve (AUC), and tubulin bundle formation in PBMCs were assessed in cycles 1 and 2. Similar analyses were also performed on tumor biopsies from one eligible patient. PBMCs exhibited dramatic microtubule bundle formation 1 h after infusion that declined by 24 h, showing a positive correlation with AUC((0-24)) for cycles 1 and 2. A similar pattern of tubulin bundle formation also was observed in a smaller proportion of breast tumor cells from one patient who exhibited a partial response to BMS-247550. This patient's tumor expressed multidrug resistance (MDR1) and MDR-associated protein (MRP1), and in addition poly(ADPribose) polymerase cleavage, a marker of cell death, was observed within 23 h after drug infusion. This patient was also heterozygous for a novel polymorphism at the extreme COOH terminus of beta-tubulin (Gly 437 Gly/Ser), although the relevance of the polymorphism to the response is unknown. In summary, microtubule bundle formation in PBMCs occurs within 1 h of treatment with BMS-247550 and is related to plasma AUC. Similar bundle formation was seen in one tumor sample, despite expression of MDR1 and MRP1. Cell death occurred 23 h after peak microtubule bundle formation in these tumor cells. These findings validate in vitro pharmacodynamic observations.

Purpose: To assess the feasibility, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary activity of BMS-184476 administered as a 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of BMS-184476 as a 1-hour IV infusion every 3 weeks without premedication to prevent hypersensitivity reactions (HSR). Plasma sampling and urine collections were performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BMS-184474., Results: Thirty-four patients were treated with 78 courses of BMS-184476 at five dose levels ranging from 20 to 80 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), consisting of severe neutropenia with fever, severe diarrhea, and/or severe mucositis, was experienced during course 1 by six of nine minimally pretreated patients treated at the 70 and 80 mg/m2 dose level. In contrast, of 15 assessable patients treated at the 60 mg/m2 dose level, which is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of BMS-184476 on this administration schedule, only one heavily pretreated patient developed DLT (grade 4 neutropenia with fever and grade 3 diarrhea). One patient developed a grade 2 HSR during a second course of BMS-184476 at the 40 mg/m2 dose level. A previously untreated patient with an advanced cholangiocarcinoma experienced a partial response, and a patient with an untreated carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction had a minor response. The pharmacokinetics of BMS-184476 seemed linear in the dose range studied. Mean +/- SD values for clearance, volume of distribution at steady-state, and terminal half-life were 220 +/- 89 mL/min/m2, 402 +/- 231 L/m2, and 40.8 +/- 21.8 hours, respectively., Conclusion: The MTD and recommended dose for phase II evaluations of BMS-184476 is 60 mg/m2 as a 1-hour IV infusion every 3 weeks. The results of this study suggest that BMS-184476 may have several advantages compared with paclitaxel in terms of toxicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmaceutics, and administration and warrants further clinical development.

UFT is composed of tegafur (FT), a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and uracil in a fixed combination (1:4). In conjunction with leucovorin, UFT is being developed for the first-line oral treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The effect of food on the oral bioavailability of UFT (2 x 100 mg capsules; dose in terms of FT) and leucovorin (2 x 15 mg tablets) was evaluated in a single-dose, randomized, two-way crossover study. Patients (n = 25) were assigned to receive both drugs after an overnight fast or 5 min after completion of a high-fat meal (721 calories) with a 3-day washout period between treatments; then they were permitted to continue on oral UFT/leucovorin therapy for safety assessment. UFT (300 mg/m2/day as three divided doses) and leucovorin (90 mg/day as three divided doses) were given for 28 days. After a 7-day rest, the 28-day cycle was repeated. Pharmacokinetics (n = 22 patients) were determined for FT, 5-FU, uracil, leucovorin, and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (an active metabolite of leucovorin). The absence of food-effect on peak plasma concentration (CMAX) and the area under the curve (AUC) was concluded if the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the treatment means was entirely contained in 0.75-1.33. Administration of UFT with food resulted in a 34% decrease in CMAX of FT, whereas the AUC of FT remained unchanged. Food decreased the CMAX and AUC values of uracil and 5-FU by 37-76%. On the contrary, the CMAX and AUC values of leucovorin and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate were increased by 14-60% with food. Time to reach CMAX for all analytes was significantly (P < or = 0.001) delayed by food. Except for the AUCs of FT, the statistical criterion for concluding a lack of food-effect was not met. These data suggest that UFT/leucovorin should not be dosed simultaneously with food. It is recommended that food should not be consumed for 1 h before and after an oral dose of UFT and leucovorin in a manner similar to pivotal Phase III trials. The 28-day oral regimen of UFT and leucovorin was generally well tolerated in the population studied.

Clearance of anticancer drugs in children is highly variable, leading to wide variability in the systemic exposure associated with each dosage escalation in Phase I studies. The purpose of this Phase I study was to escalate targeted systemic exposure to paclitaxel, rather than dose, to attenuate the impact of pharmacokinetic variability at each escalation level. Children with recurrent acute leukemias received paclitaxel as 24-h infusions at escalating levels of paclitaxel systemic exposure [i.e., area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC)]. Plasma paclitaxel concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-UV detection. A Bayesian algorithm using a two-compartment model with saturable distribution and saturable elimination was used to estimate clearance during the first 8 h of infusion; the infusion rate was adjusted 12 h after the start of infusion to achieve the target AUC. Toxicity and evidence of activity were assessed after each course. Six boys and one girl received eight courses of paclitaxel. The target AUC ranged from 31.5 to 45 microM x h. Five of the seven evaluable courses had AUCs between 75% and 125% of the target after adjustment (median, 100.2%; range, 51-151%), whereas none of the seven courses was projected to be in the target range had no change in dose been made (P = 0.021). The ratio of the achieved AUC to the target AUC was inversely related to clearance (r = -0.857; P = 0.014). Mucositis was the exposure-limiting toxicity, at AUCs lower than were expected based on Phase I studies in children with solid tumors. Pharmacokinetically-guided dosing strategies reduced variability in systemic exposure. Alternatives to traditional Phase I studies may be important in the setting of childhood leukemias because these patients show poor tolerance to Phase I therapy.

Purpose: This study was undertaken to address the influence of concurrent administration on the pharmacokinetics of UFT (uracil plus tegafur) and leucovorin (LV), and to measure the antitumor activity of a 28-consecutive-day oral regimen of UFT plus LV in patients with relapsed or refractory colorectal cancer., Methods: Patients with advanced measurable colorectal cancer who had failed previous therapy with intravenous bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were eligible. Patients were treated with UFT 300 mg/m2 per day plus LV 90 mg per day in three divided doses every 8 h for 28 days, repeated at 35-day intervals. In addition, a three-treatment by three-period crossover bioavailability comparison of oral LV 30 mg plus UFT 200 mg versus either LV or UFT alone was scheduled for the 8 days preceding the first cycle of therapy., Results: Of 19 patients enrolled, 18 were assessable for pharmacokinetics and response. When LV was coadministered with UFT, there were no statistically significant effects on tegafur, uracil, or 5-FU Cmax, AUC, or Tmax with the exception of a delayed Tmax for tegafur (P=0.03). No statistically significant differences were found in LV and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate plasma levels when LV was administered alone or with UFT. However, wide interpatient variability was observed for all parameters. There were no antitumor responses seen., Conclusions: Although the Tmax for tegafur is delayed with the concurrent administration of LV, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in any pharmacologic parameters that are of likely clinical significance. However, the great interpatient variability observed in UFT and LV pharmacology may have obscured true bioavailability effects in this small patient population. Daily oral UFT plus LV is inactive as second-line therapy in patients who have failed bolus 5-FU.

Therapeutic options for patients with advanced colorectal cancer who have failed treatment with fluorouracil (5-FU) are limited. Responses have been reported in this setting with a protracted venous infusion of 5-FU. Daily oral therapy with tegafur and uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) has the potential to mimic the pharmacology of continuous infusion 5-FU. Therefore, we undertook a phase II study of a 28-day schedule of a combination chemotherapy regimen containing oral UFT/leucovorin in patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer who had failed treatment with bolus 5-FU. In addition, we sought to determine whether coadministration of UFT and leucovorin alters the bioavailability of these agents. In a pretreatment phase, each patient underwent sequential pharmacokinetic sampling following a single dose of UFT alone, leucovorin alone, and the combination of UFT plus leucovorin. The preliminary results of this trial suggest that tegafur pharmacokinetics are not affected by coadministration of leucovorin and that folate pharmacokinetics are not affected by UFT.

Purpose: The objectives of this study were to determine etoposide pharmacokinetics during continuous low-dose oral administration to children with solid tumors and to evaluate the relationships between parameters of etoposide systemic exposure and toxicity., Patients and Methods: In this phase I study, children were administered oral etoposide (25 to 75 mg/m2/day) for 21 days as a diluted solution of the intravenous preparation, divided into three equal daily doses. Plasma pharmacokinetics were studied on day 1 of therapy in 18 children and again on day 21 in 14 of these children. Etoposide plasma concentration-time data were fitted to a first-order absorption, two-compartment model with use of bayesian estimation. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates from day 1 were used to estimate steady-state etoposide systemic exposure in all children. Stepwise multivariate regression was used in an exploratory manner to determine patient, laboratory, or pharmacokinetic predictors of toxicity., Results: Although there was substantial intrapatient variability, there was no difference in the area under the concentration-time curve [AUC(0-8hr)] measured at day 21 compared with the steady-state AUC(0-8hr) estimated from day 1 pharmacokinetic parameters (p = 0.64). Degree of neutropenia was best predicted by the estimated duration that steady-state plasma etoposide concentrations were maintained above 1 microgram/ml (t > 1 microgram/ml) rather than peak plasma concentrations, AUC(0-8hr), dosage, or other patient characteristics. Assuming a bioavailability of the oral solution of approximately 50%, the median etoposide systemic clearance was 21.4 ml/min/m2, a value similar to clearance estimates after intravenous etoposide in pediatric populations., Conclusion: We conclude that a parameter reflective of etoposide systemic exposure (t > 1 microgram/ml) correlates more strongly with neutropenia than does dosage or other patient characteristics.

Paclitaxel is a new anticancer agent showing significant promise as therapy for solid tumours and leukaemia, given alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Paclitaxel concentrations in biological specimens can be measured using high performance liquid chromatography, or more recently by immunoassay. Pharmacokinetic studies in which adults have been administered pacliaxel intravenously over 1 to 96 hours have demonstrated the following pharmacokinetic characteristics: extensive tissue distribution; high plasma protein binding (approximately 90 to 95%); variable systemic clearance, with average clearances ranging from 87 to 503 ml/min/m2 (5.2 to 30.2 L/h/m2); and minimal renal excretion of parent drug (< 10%). In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that paclitaxel is extensively metabolised by the liver to 3 primary metabolites. Cytochrome P450 enzymes of the CYP3A and CYP2C subfamilies appear to be involved in hepatic metabolism of paclitaxel. Although early reports suggested that paclitaxel has first-order pharmacokinetics, some recent trials in children and adults suggest that its elimination is saturable. The clinical importance of saturable elimination would be greatest when large dosages are administered and/or the drug is infused over a shorter period of time. In these situations, achievable plasma concentrations are likely to exceed the affinity constant for elimination (Km). Thus, small changes in dosage or infusion duration may result in disproportionately large alterations in paclitaxel systemic exposure, potentially influencing patient response. A pharmacokinetic analysis of the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel has demonstrated that paclitaxel clearance is apparently sequence dependent. Patients administered cisplatin prior to paclitaxel had lower clearances and greater clinical toxicity than patients receiving paclitaxel before cisplatin. Additional pharmacodynamic analyses have shown nonhaematological and haematological toxicity to correlate better with parameters of paclitaxel exposure (e.g. area under the plasma concentration-time curve, duration of plasma concentrations exceeding 0.1 mumol/L) than with the administered dosage.