This paper assesses the International Digital Economy and Society Index (I-DESI) which measures the development of the digital economy. Based on the European Commission’s I-DESI database of 45 countries from 2015 to 2018, the study compares criteria weights initially used for dimensions against new ones calculated using the Entropy method. Then, it recalculates the I-DESI using three different methods (Entropy, TOPSIS and Entropy-based TOPSIS) and finally compares countries rankings using Spearman’s correlation and Kendall W test. Results show that calculated entropy weights and initial scoring ones diverge considerably. In entropy, “Integration of Digital Technology and Business” rises as an important dimension while the I-DESI scoring model selected “Human Capital” instead. “Use of Internet Services by Citizens” dimension has double the weight in entropy. Finally, comparisons of the four ranking methods show, on average, a very strong positive relationship between the I-DESI initial model and both TOPSIS and Entropy methods for the period 2015 to 2018, and a moderate positive one with the Entropy-based TOPSIS. Keywords: Digital Economy Assessment, Entropy Method, I-DESI, Kendall’s W, Spearman’s Correlation, TOPSIS Method. Title: Assessment of International Digital Economy and Society Index Using Entropy based TOPSIS Methods Author: Mohamed Noufal Zerhouni, Çiğdem Özarı International Journal of Recent Research in Commerce Economics and Management (IJRRCEM) ISSN 2349-7807 Vol. 9, Issue 2, April 2022 - June 2022 Page No: 70-77 Paper Publications Website: www.paperpublications.org Published Date: 25-May-2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6579884 Paper Download link (Source) https://www.paperpublications.org/upload/book/Assessment%20of%20International-25052022-5.pdf, International Journal of Recent Research in Commerce Economics and Management, ISSN 2349-7807, Paper Publications, Website: www.paperpublications.org, {"references":["[1]\tBoden, M., Cagnin, C., Carabias-Hütter, V., Haegemann, K., & Könnölä, T. \"Facing the future: time for the EU to meet global challenges,\" 2010.","[2]\tStavytskyy, A., Kharlamova, G., & Stoica, E. A. \"The Analysis of the Digital Economy and Society Index in the EU,\" Baltic Journal of European Studies, 9(3), pp. 245-261, 2019","[3]\tKnickrehm, M., Berthon, B., & Daugherty, P. \"Digital disruption: The growth multiplier\". Accenture Strategy, 2016.","[4]\tVan Gorp, N., & Honnefelder, S. \"Challenges for competition policy in the digitalised economy\". Communications & Strategies, (99), p.149, 2015.","[5]\tAfonasova M.A., Panfilova E.E., Galichkina M.A. \"Social and Economic Background of Digital Economy: Conditions for Transition,\" European Research Studies, Special Issue 3, vol. 21, pp. 292–302, 2018.","[6]\tStoica, E. A., & Bogoslov, I. A. \"A comprehensive analysis regarding DESI country progress for Romania relative to the European average trend. In Balkan Region,\" Conference on Engineering and Business Education,Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 258-266. Sciendo, Dec. 2017.","[7]\tCámara, N., & Tuesta, D. \"DiGiX: the digitization index\" No. 17/03, 2017.","[8]\tHaltiwanger, J., & Jarmin, R. S. \"Measuring the digital economy. Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools and Research,\" pp.13-33, 2000.","[9]\tVelasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. \"An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods,\" International journal of operations research, 10(2), pp.56-66, 2013.","[10]\tAzadeh, A., Salehi, V., Jokar, M., & Asgari, A. \"An integrated multi-criteria computer simulation-AHP-TOPSIS approach for optimum maintenance planning by incorporating operator error and learning effects,\" Intelligent Industrial Systems, 2(1), pp.35-53, 2016.","[11]\tMoradian, M., Modanloo, V., & Aghaiee, S. \"Comparative analysis of multi criteria decision making techniques for material selection of brake booster valve body,\" Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 6(5), pp.526-534, 2019.","[12]\tAnanda, J., & Herath, G. \"Evaluating public risk preferences in forest land-use choices using multi-attribute utility theory,\" Ecological Economics, 55(3), pp.408-419, 2005.","[13]\tBentes, A. V., Carneiro, J., da Silva, J. F., & Kimura, H. \"Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP,\" Journal of business research, 65(12), pp.1790-1799, 2012.","[14]\tHermans, E., Brijs, T., Wets, G., & Vanhoof, K.. \"Road Safety: Lessons to learn from a data envelopment analysis,\" Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(1), pp.174-182, 2009.","[15]\tKaraca, C., Ulutaş, A., Yamaner, G., & Topal, A. \"The selection of the best Olympic place for Turkey using an integrated MCDM model,\" Decision Science Letters, 8(1), pp.1-16, 2019."]}