Search

Background Livedo is a well-known skin condition in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) which correspond to small vessels involvement. The influence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) on the occurrence of livedo is controversial. The aim of our study was to estimate the risk of livedo associated with aPL in patients with SLE. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 1977 to 2021 to estimate the risk of livedo in SLE patients according to different aPL profiles. Data sources were PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, hand search, and reference lists of studies. Studies were selected if they included SLE patients with descriptions of the exposure to aPL and the outcome ( livedo). Two independent investigators assessed study eligibility, quality, and extracted patient characteristics from each study as well as exposure (aPL) and outcome ( livedo). Risk estimates were pooled using random effects models and sensitivity analyses. For all stages of the meta-analysis, we followed the PRISMA guidelines. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015027377. Results Of the 2,355 articles identified, 27 were included with a total of 4,810 SLE patients. The frequency of livedo was 25.5% in aPL-positive patients and 13.3% in aPL-negative patients. The overall Odds Ratio (OR) for livedo in aPL-positive patients compared to aPL-negative patients was 2.91 (95% CI; 2.17–3.90). The risk of livedo was significantly increased for most of aPL subtypes, including lupus anticoagulant (LA) (OR = 4.45 [95% CI; 2.21–8.94]), IgG anticardiolipin (OR = 3.95 [95% CI; 2.34–6.65]), and IgG anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 (OR = 3.49 [95% CI; 1.68–7.27]). Conclusions We demonstrated in this meta-analysis an excess risk of livedo in aPL-positive SLE patients compared to aPL-negative patients. For daily practice, in patients with SLE, livedo associated with aPL could correspond to a peculiar group of patients with small vessel disease. Livedo could be a good candidate for inclusion in future classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome.

Background Endothelial damage has been described in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients. However, it is uncertain whether circulating endothelial cells (CECs)—which are released when endothelial injury occurs—can be a marker of patients at high risk for thrombosis. Methods Ninety-seven patients with aPL and/or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were included. CECs were determined by an automated CellSearch system. We also assayed plasma levels of tissue factor-bearing extracellular vesicles (TF+/EVs) and soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (sTREM-1) as markers of endothelial dysfunction/damage. Results Patients' mean age was 46.1 ± 13.9 years, 77 were women. Thirty-seven had SLE and 75 patients were suffering from antiphospholipid syndrome. Thirty-seven percent of patients presented a medical history of arterial thrombosis and 46% a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Thirteen patients had increased levels of CECs (>20/mL), with a mean CEC level of 48.3 ± 21.3 per mL. In univariate analysis, patients with obesity or medical history of myocardial infarction (MI), VTE, or nephropathy had a significant increased CEC level. In multivariate analysis, obesity (odds ratio [OR] = 6.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42–25.94), VTE (OR = 7.59 [95% CI: 1.38–41.66]), and MI (OR = 5.5 [95% CI: 1.1–26.6)] were independently and significantly associated with elevated CECs. We also identified significant correlations between CECs and other markers of endothelial dysfunction: sTREM-1 and TF+/EVs. Conclusion This study demonstrated that endothelial injury assessed by the levels of CECs was associated with thromboembolic events in patients with aPL and/or autoimmune diseases.

Objectives In APS, precise evaluation of thrombotic risk is a major challenge. Different players, such as activated protein C (APC) resistance or neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) contribute to the risk of thrombosis. Nevertheless, no study has investigated the interaction between these actors. The main objective of this study was to investigate the relation between NETs and APC resistance. Methods We designed a cross-sectional study including APS/antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) patients and patients with autoimmune diseases (AID). We performed thrombin generation tests without and with APC to determine APC resistance. To evaluate circulating NETs, we measured plasma levels of MPO-DNA complexes and cell-free DNA with ELISA. Results We recruited 117 patients with definite APS/aPL or AID. We found a positive correlation between NETs and APC resistance, in APS patients and specifically in patients with high thrombotic risk, displaying LA or positivity of all three aPL tests (triple+), or anti-domain I IgG (aDI+). All these patient subgroups had increased NETs concentrations and APC resistance. As the risk profile for thrombosis increased, the relationship between NETs and APC resistance was stronger. Conclusion We have shown that NETs participate in the hypercoagulable state of APS patients by contributing to APC resistance, in particular in high-risk patients. In these most at-risk patients, a targeted action on NETs could reduce APC resistance and constitute a new therapeutic approach in the treatment of APS patients in addition to antithrombotic therapy.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of thrombotic events. Therapies for IBD have the potential to modulate this risk. The aims of this Evidence-Based Guideline were to summarize available evidence and to provide practical recommendations regarding epidemiological aspects, prevention and drug-related risks of venous and arterial thrombotic events in patients with IBD. A virtual meeting took place in May 2020 involving 14 international IBD experts and 3 thrombosis experts from 12 countries. Proposed statements were voted upon in an anonymous manner. Agreement was defined as at least 75% of participants voting as ‘fully agree’ or ‘mostly agree’ with each statement. For each statement, the level of evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system. Consensus was reached for 19 statements. Patients with IBD harbour an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombotic events. Thromboprophylaxis is indicated during hospitalization of any cause in patients with IBD. Disease activity is a modifiable risk factor in patients with IBD, and physicians should aim to achieve deep remission to reduce the risk. Exposure to steroids should be limited. Antitumour necrosis factor agents might be associated with a reduced risk of thrombotic events., Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of thrombotic events. This Evidence-Based Guideline presents an international consensus on the prevention of venous and arterial thrombotic events in patients with IBD, and includes 19 recommendations for clinical practice.

Objective The aim of the study was to describe clinical and biological characteristics and thrombotic relapses of patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) after the age of 65 years, in comparison with patients diagnosed with APS before 65. Methods This retrospective multicenter study was performed to 2005 from 2017 and included patients diagnosed with APS after the age of 65 years, in accordance with Sydney criteria. We compared these patients with APS patients diagnosed before the age of 65 years, and with control thrombotic patients older than 65 years. Results Fifty-eight APS patients over the age of 65 years were compared to 127 APS patients aged less than 65 and to 58 controls. In elderly APS versus younger APS, there was a male predominance (58.6% vs 36.2% p = .001); myocardial infarction and lower limb deep vein thrombosis (LLDVT) were more frequent in elderly, respectively, 12.1% versus 1.6% ( p = .005), and 44.8% versus 29.9% ( p = .048). Anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) IgM was more frequently found in old patients compared to younger patients (33.9% vs 18.1%, p = .02), contrary to lupus anticoagulant (LAC) (52.8% vs 66.9%, p = .02). Older patients were more often diagnosed with single positive APS (82.8% vs 59.8% p = .002). The thrombotic relapse free survival was lower in elderly APS patients ( p = .044) compared to younger APS. Elderly APS patients had more recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis ( p = .03) and had poorer overall survival ( p = .004) than elderly controls. Conclusion In this study, APS was different in patients aged more than 65 years, with a male predominance and more myocardial infarctions and LLDVT at diagnosis. Single antiphopholipid positivity and aCL IgM were more frequent in older patients. Older patient with APS had more thrombotic recurrence during follow-up. Compared to elderly controls, elderly APS patients had more thrombosis recurrences and poorer survival.

Thromboembolic manifestations are relatively frequent in patients with intermediate/severe hyperhomocysteinemia (>30 µmol/L) related to inherited disorders and deficiencies in vitamin B12 and folate. In contrast, moderate hyperhomocysteinemia (15–30 µmol/L) is a modest predictor of cardiovascular risk. The recognition of homocysteine as a cardiovascular risk factor has been challenged by some but not all randomized clinical trials. We reviewed the main data of this controversy and formulated conclusions to be translated in clinical practice.Homocysteine-lowering trials have been performed in cardiovascular subjects with moderate but not intermediate/severe hyperhomocysteinemia despite the dose–effect risk association. The first meta-analyses found no benefit and led cardiology societies not recommending homocysteine in the assessment of cardiovascular risk. This guideline challenged the need to diagnose and treat the nutritional and genetic causes of intermediate/major hyperhomocysteinemia and was not revised when larger meta-analyses concluded to a reduced risk of stroke. In a recent observational study, 84% of consecutive cardiovascular patients assessed for homocysteine had intermediate or major hyperhomocysteinemia, which was properly assessed in only half of the cases and related to B12 and/or folate deficiency and Addison/Biermer disease in 55% of these cases.In conclusion, revisiting observational studies and clinical trials suggests that cardiovascular patients should be screened for hyperhomocysteinemia, when no other risk factor is found. Patients with intermediate/major hyperhomocysteinemia should be properly assessed and treated for B vitamin deficiencies and inherited disorders according to current guidelines. Further trials are needed to assess the effect of lowering homocysteine according to hyperhomocysteinemia categories at baseline.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) requires persistent presence of lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (aCL) IgG/IgM, or anti-β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) IgG/IgM antibodies. Other antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) such as antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) are promising in assessment of thrombotic APS (TAPS).AIM: To evaluate the added value of aPS/PT IgG and IgM in TAPS.MATERIAL AND METHODS: aPS/PT IgG/IgM, aCL IgG/IgM, aβ2GPI IgG/IgM, and LAC were determined in 757 patients (TAPS and controls). aPS/PT cut-off values were calculated, aPS/PT titers and positivity were compared between TAPS and controls, type of thrombosis, and antibody profiles. Likelihood ratios (LR), odds ratios (OR) and aPL-score were determined.RESULTS: aPS/PT IgG and IgM were associated with TAPS and triple positivity. In-house calculated cut-offs were higher for IgM (43 units), compared to manufacturer's cut-off (30 units). Thresholds of 90 (IgG)/200 (IgM) units were determined as high-titer cut-off. Higher aPS/PT titers were observed in triple positive patients and showed higher LR and OR for TAPS. aPS/PT was independently associated with TAPS when adjusted for aCL/aβ2GPI, but not when adjusted for LAC. In isolated LAC positive patients, aPS/PT was positive in 27.1% TAPS patients and in 77.3% patients with autoimmune disease. Diagnostic value of aPL-score did not differ with and without including aPS/PT.CONCLUSION: aPS/PT positivity, especially with high antibody titer, is associated with TAPS diagnosis. Analysis on top of current laboratory criteria is not essential in TAPS diagnosis, but aPS/PT could be useful in patients with thrombosis and a double positive aPL profile (aCL+/aβ2GPI+).

Background Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by several clinical manifestations such as venous and arterial thrombosis associated with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Several studies confirmed that retinal vein occlusion was the most common APS ocular manifestation. The purpose of this study was to identify ophthalmologic manifestations in a homogeneous cohort of well-defined persistently aPL-positive patients and to determine variables associated with these manifestations. Methods APL-positive patients were selected from two research programs. All ophthalmologic manifestations including those related to APS were recorded. Results A total of 117 patients were included and 10 of them had APS-related ophthalmologic manifestations (glaucoma, hydroxychloroquine-related maculopathy, anterior acute uveitis, anterior ischemic optic neuropathy). Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) (OR = 3.4[95%CI; 0.9-12.7), corticosteroids (OR = 9.0 [95%CI; 2.2-37.7]) and aPL-related nephropathy (OR = 7.1 [95%CI; 1.7-30.0]) were significatively associated with the risk of APS-related ophthalmologic manifestations. Conclusion Most of ocular manifestations in this study were iatrogenic related to corticosteroids or hydroxychloroquine. Patients with SLE, small vessel thrombosis in general, or with aPL-related nephropathy in particular, seemed at higher risk to develop APS-related ophthalmologic manifestations thus deserving adequate monitoring.

Thrombin generation (TG) assay is an overall assay to assess the functionality of the hemostatic system and may be a useful tool in diagnosing patients with hyper- and hypocoagulability. Lack of standardization in performing the assays contributes largely to poor correlation between assays and study results. The current lack of standardization remains a major issue in the setting of TG, as illustrated in a recent survey of the ISTH/SSC indicating differences in pre-, analytical, and post-analytical factors among users. These factors may considerably affect the between-laboratory reproducibility of results. Based on the results of the survey and a current review of the literature, along with insights and strong consensus of key investigators in the field, we present guidance for measurement of TG in a clinical setting. Recommendations on blood drawing, handling, processing, and sample storage; reagent concentration and source; analytical conditions on dilution of samples and temperature; calibration and replicate testing; calculation and interpretation of results; and reference values are addressed to help in reducing interlaboratory variation. These recommendations aim at harmonization between methods and laboratories to support the application of TG in patient diagnosis and management.

ObjectiveIn antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) nephropathy, activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) contributes to endothelial cell proliferation, a key finding of aPL microvascular disease. Here, we examined mTOR activation in the skin of aPL-positive patients with livedo.MethodsThree patient groups with livedo were studied: (1) persistently aPL-positive with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); (2) persistently aPL-positive without SLE; and (3) aPL-negative SLE (control). After collecting aPL-related medical history, two 5-mm skin biopsies of livedo were performed on each patient: (1) peripheral (erythematous-violaceous lesion); and (2) central (nonviolaceous area). We stained specimens for phosphorylated protein kinase B (p-AKT) and phosphorylated S6 ribosomal protein (p-S6RP) as mTOR activity markers, CD31 to identify endothelial cells, and Ki-67 to show cellular proliferation. We counted cells in the epidermis and compared mTOR-positive cell counts between peripheral and central samples, and between patient groups, using Freidman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsTen patients with livedo reticularis were enrolled: 4 aPL-positive without SLE (antiphospholipid syndrome [APS] classification met, n = 3), 4 aPL-positive SLE (APS classification met, n = 3), and 2 aPL-negative SLE (control). In all aPL-positive patients, epidermal p-AKT and p-S6RP staining were significantly increased in both peripheral and central skin samples when compared to aPL-negative SLE controls; both were more pronounced in the lower basal layers of epidermis.ConclusionOur study demonstrates increased mTOR activity in livedoid lesions of aPL-positive patients with or without SLE compared to aPL-negative patients with SLE, with more prominent activity in the lower basal layers of the epidermis. These findings may serve as a basis for further investigating the mTOR pathway in aPL-positive patients.

International audience; Background: Fetal biometry quality directly influences obstetrical care relevance. However, obstetrician proficiencies are heterogeneous in particular during initial training. Objectives: To assess the predictive value of OSAUS scale to identify operators with enough command to perform a valid estimation of fetal weight (EFW) (I). This study also assesses OSAUS intra-operator inter-exams variability (II) and pass/fail score relevancy (III). Methods: Lecturers in Nancy University Hospital assessed trainees’ proficiency for EWF systematically and prospectively through OSAUS scale. The trainee assessment was performed right after the one of the senior operator (reference EFW) on three consecutive patients during standard care ultrasounds. To ensure variability in proficiency within the sample, previous practice was taken into account during enrollment (“novices” and “intermediates” for < 20 and 20 past exams, respectively). Correlation between mean OSAUS and validity of EFW (a valid EFW was defined by a difference with the reference EWF < 0.8 Z-score) and variability between consecutive assessments were assessed. Results: The study population was constituted of 8 “novice” and 8 “intermediate” trainees. Association between OSAUS and EFW validity was significant (P < 0.03) (I). Intra-operator inter-exams variability was majored in the “novice” group (coefficients of variation were 25% vs. 10% in “novice” and “intermediate” group respectively) (II). Within the sample, specificity and positive predictive value of a pass/fail score OSAUS > 3.5 to predict EFW validity were 77% and 71%, respectively (III). Conclusion: A 3.5 OSAUS pass/fail score could provide a relevant threshold to estimate operator proficiency in assessing fetal biometry in an autonomous and secure way.

Background Antibodies binding to domain I of β2-glycoprotein I (aDI) and activated protein C (APC) resistance are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis in cross-sectional studies. The objective of this study was to assess their predictive value for future thromboembolic events in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) or antiphospholipid syndrome. Methods This prospective multicenter cohort study included consecutive patients with aPL or systemic lupus erythematosus. We followed 137 patients (43.5 ± 15.4 year old; 107 women) for a mean duration of 43.1 ± 20.7 months. Results We detected aDI IgG antibodies by ELISA in 21 patients. An APC sensitivity ratio (APCsr) was determined using a thrombin generation–based test. The APCsr was higher in patients with anti–domain I antibodies demonstrating APC resistance (0.75 ± 0.13 vs 0.48 ± 0.20, P 95th percentile; HR, 6.07 [95% CI, 1.69–21.87]; P = 0.006). A sensitivity analysis showed an increased risk of higher aDI IgG levels up to HR 5.61 (95% CI, 1.93–16.31; P = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, aDI IgG (HR, 3.90 [95% CI, 1.33–11.46]; P = 0.01) and APC resistance (HR, 4.98 [95% CI, 1.36–18.28]; P = 0.02) remained significant predictors of thrombosis over time. Conclusions Our study shows that novel tests for antibodies recognizing domain I of β2-glycoprotein I and functional tests identifying APC resistance are significant predictors of thrombosis over time and may be useful for risk stratification.

Clarity and guidance is required with regard to the use of direct oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients, within the confines of the recent European Medicines Agency recommendations, discrepant recommendations in other international guidelines and the limited evidence base. To address this, the Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) chair and co-chairs together with SSC Control of Anticoagulation members propose guidance for healthcare professionals to help them manage APS patients. Uncertainty in this field will be addressed. This guidance will also serve as a call and focus for research.

Background Anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) immunoglobulin A (IgA) antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have shown to associate with thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. However, inclusion of IgA aPL in the classification criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has been debated. We investigated the value of aCL and aβ2GPI IgA aPL in the detection of thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity in addition to the current aPL panel for APS. Methods We included 1,068 patients from eight European medical centers: 259 thrombotic APS patients, 122 obstetric APS patients, 204 non-APS thrombosis patients, 33 non-APS obstetric patients, 60 APS patients with unspecified clinical manifestations, 196 patients with autoimmune diseases, and 194 controls. aCL and aβ2GPI IgG/M/A were detected with four commercial assays and lupus anticoagulant was determined by the local center. Results Positivity for IgA aPL was found in 17 to 26% of the patients with clinical manifestations of APS and in 6 to 13% of the control population. Both aCL and aβ2GPI IgA were significantly associated with thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. Isolated IgA positivity was rare in patients with clinical manifestations of APS (0.3–5%) and not associated with thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity. Addition of IgA to the current criterion panel did not increase odds ratios for thrombosis nor pregnancy morbidity. Conclusion aCL and aβ2GPI IgA are associated with clinical manifestations of APS. However, isolated IgA positivity was rare and not associated with thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. These data do not support testing for aCL and aβ2GPI IgA subsequent to conventional aPL assays in identifying patients with thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity.

Background Classification of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) relies predominantly on detecting antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Antibodies against a domain I (DI) epitope of anti-beta 2glycoprotein I (beta 2GPI) proved to be pathogenic, but are not included in the current classification criteria. Objectives Investigate the clinical value of detecting anti-DI IgG in APS. Patients/Methods From eight European centers 1005 patients were enrolled. Anti-cardiolipin (CL) and anti-beta 2GPI were detected by four commercially available solid phase assays; anti-DI IgG by the QUANTA Flash (R) beta 2GPI domain I assay. Results Odds ratios (ORs) of anti-DI IgG for thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity proved to be higher than those of the conventional assays. Upon restriction to patients positive for anti-beta 2GPI IgG, anti-DI IgG positivity still resulted in significant ORs. When anti-DI IgG was added to the criteria aPLs or used as a substitute for anti-beta 2GPI IgG/anti-CL IgG, ORs for clinical symptoms hardly improved. Upon removing anti-DI positive patients, lupus anticoagulant remained significantly correlated with clinical complications. Anti-DI IgG are mainly present in high-risk triple positive patients, showing higher levels. Combined anti-DI and triple positivity confers a higher risk for clinical symptoms compared to only triple positivity. Conclusions Detection of anti-DI IgG resulted in higher ORs for clinical manifestations than the current APS classification criteria. Regardless of the platform used to detect anti-beta 2GPI/anti-CL, addition of anti-DI IgG measured by QUANTA Flash (R) did not improve the clinical associations, possibly due to reduced exposure of the pathogenic epitope of DI. Our results demonstrate that anti-DI IgG potentially helps in identifying high-risk patients.

The diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) relies on the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Currently, lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), and antibeta2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgG or IgM are included as laboratory criteria, if persistently present. LAC measurement remains a complicated procedure with many pitfalls and interfered by anticoagulant therapy. Solid-phase assays for aCL and aβ2GPI show interassay differences. These methodological issues make the laboratory diagnosis of APS challenging. In the interpretation of aPL. results, antibody profiles help in identifying patients at risk. Other aPL, such as antibodies against the domain I of beta2-glycoprotein (aDI) and antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies have been studied in the last years and may be useful in risk stratification of APS patients. Because of the methodological shortcomings of immunological and clotting assays, these non-criteria aPL may be useful in patients with incomplete antibody profiles to confirm or exclude the increased risk profile. This manuscript will focus on the laboratory aspects, the clinical relevance of assays and interpretation of aPL results in the diagnosis of APS., Highlights • The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) define the diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). • Laboratory criteria are lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin (aCL), and antibeta2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgG/IgM. • Lupus anticoagulant measurement, as well as solid phase assays for aCL and aβ2GPI, show methodological challenges. • Antibodies against domain I of β2GPI (aDI) and antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies are on-criteria aPL.. • aDI and aPS/PT may be useful in risk stratification of APS patients.

Objective The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess the association between spontaneous vaginal delivery and manual rotation during labor for occiput posterior or transverse positions. Our secondary objective was to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes. Data sources An electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov , and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials covered the period from January 2000 to September 2021 without language restrictions. Study eligibility criteria Eligibility criteria included all randomized trials with singleton pregnancies at ≥ 37 gestational weeks comparing rotations with controls. The primary outcome was the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery rate. Additional secondary outcomes were rate of occiput posterior position at delivery, operative vaginal delivery, cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injury, prolonged second stage of labor, shoulder dystocia, neonatal acidosis, and phototherapy. Sub-group analyses were performed according to types of position (occiput posterior or transverse), techniques used (whole-hand or digital rotation), and parity (nulliparous or parous). Methods The quality of each study was evaluated with the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). The meta-analysis used random-effects models depending on their heterogeneity, and risks ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. Results Seven of 384 studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected. They included 1402 women: 704 in their manual rotation groups and 698 in their control groups. Manual rotation was associated with a higher rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery: 64.9% vs. 59.5% (risk ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval,1.03-1.16; P=.005; 95% prediction interval, 0.90-1.32). This association was no longer significant after stratification by parity or by technique used. Manual rotation was associated with spontaneous vaginal delivery only for the occiput posterior position (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.15). It was also associated with a reduction in occiput posterior or transverse positions at delivery (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.87) and in episiotomies (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.98). The groups did not differ significantly for cesarean deliveries, operative vaginal deliveries, or neonatal outcomes. Conclusion Manual rotation increases the spontaneous vaginal delivery rate.

Contexte et problématique :La pandémie de coronavirus a affecté le système éducatif du monde entier. Les stages cliniques des étudiants en médecine sont majoritairement suspendus. Il existe une incertitude quant à la durée de la situation. De même il est difficile de prédire si des situations comparables vont se reproduire dans le futur. Pour garantir la continuité pédagogique, il est nécessaire de proposer d’autres stratégies pédagogiques en préservant au maximum l’authenticité clinique.Objectifs :Cet article vise à : (1) fournir quelques éléments de réflexion pour guider les enseignants dans ce nouvel environnement d’apprentissage ; (2) présenter différentes modalités d’enseignement à distance disponibles, leurs avantages et les enjeux, en s’appuyant sur la littérature ; (3) illustrer la mise en œuvre et l’évaluation d’une telle stratégie à partir d’un retour d’expérience concernant un module électif offert aux étudiants de deuxième cycle en stage dans le service d’endocrinologie.Résultats et conclusion : Les résultats préliminaires suggèrent une satisfaction globale des étudiants et le souhait de poursuivre ces séances dans le futur. Les enseignants et les étudiants doivent réussir à trouver les avantages et les enjeux potentiels des nouvelles technologies non seulement dans l’enseignement, mais également dans le domaine du diagnostic et celui de soins.

Introduction: The confirmation time interval for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been extended to 12 weeks as epiphenomenal antibodies may disappear after 6 weeks. Our aim was to analyse extended persistence of aPL positivity beyond the 12‐week interval. Methods: We retrospectively analysed our database of 23 856 aPL test samples collected between 2005 and 2017 from 17 367 consecutive patients. Two groups of patients were identified among aPL‐positive patients, confirmed at 12 weeks: with or without extended persistence beyond confirmatory testing. Percentages of extended persistence are given according to the initial aPL positivity profiles, and baseline laboratory variables are compared between the two groups. Results: Three hundred and twenty‐seven patients confirmed aPL‐positive had subsequent testing. The vast majority of them displayed extended persistence in the long term: 89.6% and up to 97.9% for patients with initial triple positivity. In extended persistent positive patients, there were more LA‐positive initial samples, and baseline LA test values and IgG aCL titres were higher than in nonpersistent positive patients. Conclusion: Data from a large database of an aPL referral laboratory showed that the time interval of 12 weeks defining persistence of aPL positivity was appropriate for the majority of patients. Furthermore, we found baseline features associated with extended persistence.

Background The anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity with persistent presence of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL). Laboratory criteria include aPL detection by coagulation tests for lupus anticoagulant (LAC) or solid phase assays measuring anti-β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) or anti-cardiolipin (aCL) immunoglobulin (Ig) G/IgM antibodies. External quality control programs illustrate that commercially available aPL assays produce variable results. Objective We aimed to investigate the agreement and diagnostic accuracy of solid phase assays. Materials and Methods In this multi-centre study, 1,168 patient samples were tested on one site for aCL and aβ2GPI IgG/IgM antibodies by four solid phase test systems. Samples included APS patients, controls and monoclonal antibodies (MoAB) against different epitopes of β2GPI. LAC was determined by the local centre. Results aCL IgM assays resulted in the most discrepancies (60%), while aCL IgG and aβ2GPI IgM assays resulted in lower discrepancies (36%), suggesting better agreement. Discrepant samples displayed lower median aPL titers. Dependent on the solid phase test system, odds ratios (ORs) for thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity ranged from 1.98 to 2.56 and 3.42 to 4.78, respectively. Three platforms showed lower sensitivity for MoAB directed against the glycine (Gly) 40-arginine (Arg) 43 epitope of domain I of β2GPI. Conclusion Poor agreement was observed between different commercially available aCL and aβ2GPI IgG/IgM assays, hampering uniformity in the identification of aPL-positive patients. Clinical association was globally concordant between solid phase test systems considering results of the four aPL together. An assay sensitive in detecting the MoAB against Gly40-Arg43 of domain I of β2GPI reached the highest OR for thrombosis.

International audience; No abstract available

International audience; The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed by the presence of lupus anticoagulant and/or antibodies against cardiolipin or β2-glycoprotein-1 and the occurrence of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. The assessment of overall coagulation is known to differ in APS patients compared to normal subjects. The accelerated production of key factor thrombin causes a prothrombotic state in APS patients, and the reduced efficacy of the activated protein C pathway promotes this effect. Even though significant differences exist in the coagulation profile between normal controls and APS patients, it is not possible to rely on a single test result to diagnose APS. A neural network is a computing system inspired by the human brain that can be trained to distinguish between healthy subjects and patients based on subject specific data. In a first cohort of patients, we developed a neural networking that diagnoses APS. We clinically validated this neural network in a separate cohort consisting of APS patients, normal controls, controls visiting the hospital for other indications and two diseased control groups (thrombosis patients and auto-immune disease patients). The positive predictive value ranged from 62% in the hospital controls to 91% in normal controls and the negative predictive value of the neural network ranged from 86% in the thrombosis control group to 95% in the hospital controls. The sensitivity of the neural network was higher than 90% in all control groups. In conclusion, we developed a neural network that accurately diagnoses APS in the validation cohort. After further clinical validation in newly diagnosed patients, this neural network could possibly be clinically implemented to diagnose APS based on thrombin generation data.

The outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (Covid-19) has deeply challenged the world population, but also our medical knowledge. Special attention has been paid early to an activation of coagulation, then to an elevated rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. These data suggested that anticoagulant drugs should be evaluated in the treatment of patients with COVID-19. The publication of unexpected high rates of VTE in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, despite receiving thromboprophylaxis, open the way to dedicated trials, evaluating modified regimens of thromboprophylaxis. Moreover, the further improvement in our comprehension of the disease, particularly the pulmonary endothelial dysfunction increased the hope that anticoagulant drugs may also protect patients from pulmonary thrombosis. In this comprehensive review, we cover the different situations where thromboprophylaxis standard may be modified (medically-ill inpatients, ICU inpatients, outpatients), and describe some of the current randomized controls trials evaluating new regimens of thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19, including the preliminary available results. We also discuss the potential of anticoagulant drugs to target the thromboinflammation described in patients with severe COVID-19., Graphical abstract Unlabelled Image

International audience; Purpose of review: COVID-19 patients have a procoagulant state with a high prevalence of thrombotic events. The hypothesis of an involvement of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been suggested by several reports. Here, we reviewed 48 studies investigating aPL in COVID-19 patients.Recent findings: Prevalence of Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) ranged from 35% to 92% in ICU patients. Anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgG and IgM were found in up to 52% and up to 40% of patients respectively. Anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2-GPI) IgG and IgM were found in up to 39% and up to 34% of patients respectively. Between 1% and 12% of patients had a triple positive aPL profile. There was a high prevalence of aβ2-GPI and aCL IgA isotype. Two cohort studies found few persistent LA but more persistent solid phase assay aPL over time. aPL determination and their potential role is a real challenge for the treatment of this disease.

Vascular lesions of the hand are common and are distinct from vascular lesions elsewhere because of the terminal vascular network in this region, the frequent hand exposure to trauma and microtrauma, and the superficial location of the lesions. Vascular lesions in the hand may be secondary to local pathology, a proximal source of emboli, or systemic diseases with vascular compromise. In most cases, ischaemic conditions are investigated with Doppler ultrasonography. However, computed tomography angiography (CTA) or dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is often necessary for treatment planning. MR imaging is frequently performed with MRA to distinguish between vascular malformations, vascular tumours, and perivascular tumours. Some vascular tumours preferentially affect the hand, such as pyogenic granulomas or spindle cell haemangiomas associated with Maffucci syndrome. Glomus tumours are the most frequent perivascular tumours of the hand. The purpose of this article is to describe the state-of-the-art acquisition protocols and illustrate the different patterns of vascular lesions and perivascular tumours of the hand.

Les anevrysmes infectieux de l’aorte abdominale (AIAA), consecutifs a une infection bacterienne, se developpent typiquement sur un vaisseau anterieurement sain mais parfois sur un anevrysme arteriel deja constitue. Nous n’envisagerons pas ici les infections de materiel prothetique. Les facteurs de risque des AIAA sont representes par des infections systemiques (sepsis, endocardites), des infections moco-regionales, des complications iatrogeniques d’actes interventionnels, la toxicomanie intraveineuse et sont egalement aggraves par une immunodepression ou un âge eleve. Les manifestations cliniques vont combiner des signes cliniques d’anevrysme abdominal non anterieurement diagnostique et un tableau infectieux. Des complications peuvent etre revelatrices : syndrome fissuraire, rupture d’anevrysme, fistule aortoduodenale. Les aspects de diagnostic microbiologique et d’imagerie seront traites dans une communication separee. Deux cas cliniques informatifs permettront d’illustrer une demarche de diagnostic integre et d’indiquer les apports potentiels de la tomographie par emission de positons (TEPscan) et de l’echographie de contraste. Plusieurs facteurs de mauvais pronostic ont ete identifies, cependant le pronostic global est grave avec une mortalite precoce significative et un taux de survie a 10 ans inferieur a 50 % ce qui souligne l’importance d’un diagnostic precoce et d’une prise en charge precoce et adaptee [1] .

International audience; Background: The gold standard for secondary thromboprophylaxis in APS is long term anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Because of their widespread use and potential advantages of directs oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over VKAs, they have been prescribed in APS without definitive evidence of their safety and efficacy in this context. Recent specific randomized controlled trials (RCT) in APS and results from pivotal RCTs comparing DOACs vs VKAs are now available. Their results are conflicting but these studies have been conducted in different APS populations.Purpose of review: To summarize available data from RCT and determine risks of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding.Results: Four studies were included and 23 and 10 thrombotic events were recorded among 282 and 294 APS patients treated with DOACs and warfarin respectively. Overall recurrent thrombotic events were not significantly increased during DOACs treatment (OR = 2.22 [95% CI, 0.58-8.43]) compared to VKAs. However, when different types of thrombosis were analyzed separately, there was an increased risk of recurrent arterial thrombosis (5.17 [95% CI, 1.57-17.04]) with DOACs compared to warfarin but no significant higher risk of venous thrombosis (OR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.23-2.06). No increased risk of bleeding was found.In conclusion: In APS patients treated with DOACs compared to those treated with warfarin, no evidence of a higher risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism was found however there was a significantly increased risk of recurrent arterial thrombosis. Moreover risk of recurrent arterial thrombosis tended to be more frequent in patients with a history of arterial thrombosis. These results are in line with international guidelines which recommend not to use DOACs in APS patients with a history of arterial thrombosis but raise the question of the efficacy of DOACs to prevent venous thrombosis in a subset of APS patients without a history of arterial thrombosis.

Background Anti beta 2glycoprotein I (a beta 2GPI) and anticardiolipin (aCL) IgG/IgM show differences in positive/negative agreement and titers between solid phase platforms. Method-specific semiquantitative categorization of titers could improve and harmonize the interpretation across platforms. Aim To evaluate the traditional 40/80-unit thresholds used for aCL and a beta 2GPI for categorization into moderate/high positivity with different analytical systems, and to compare with alternative thresholds. Material and methods aCL and a beta 2GPI thresholds were calculated for two automated systems (chemiluminescent immunoassay [CLIA] and multiplex flow immunoassay [MFI]) by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis on 1108 patient samples, including patients with and without antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and confirmed on a second population (n = 279). Alternatively, regression analysis on diluted standard material was applied to identify thresholds. Thresholds were compared to 40/80 threshold measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Additionally, likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated. Results Threshold levels of 40/80 units show poor agreement between ELISA and automated platforms for classification into low/moderate/high positivity, especially for aCL/a beta 2GPI IgG. Agreement for semiquantitative interpretation of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) IgG between ELISA and CLIA/MFI improves with alternative thresholds. LR for aPL IgG increase for thrombotic and obstetric APS based on 40/80 thresholds for ELISA and adapted thresholds for the other systems, but not for IgM. Conclusion Use of 40/80 units as medium/high thresholds is acceptable for aCL/a beta 2GPI IgG ELISA, but not for CLIA and MFI. Alternative semiquantitative thresholds for non-ELISA platforms can be determined by a clinical approach or by using monoclonal antibodies. Semiquantitative reporting of aPL IgM has less impact on increasing probability for APS.

International audience; Hereditary spastic paraplegias are heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorders. Understanding of their pathogenicmechanisms remains sparse, and therapeutic options are lacking. We characterized a mouse model lacking the Cyp2u1 gene, lossof which is known to be involved in a complex form of these diseases in humans. We showed that this model partially recapitulated the clinical and biochemical phenotypes of patients. Using electron microscopy, lipidomic, and proteomicstudies, we identified vitamin B2 as a substrate of the CYP2U1 enzyme, as well as coenzyme Q, neopterin, and IFN-α levels asputative biomarkers in mice and fluids obtained from the largest series of CYP2U1-mutated patients reported so far. We alsoconfirmed brain calcifications as a potential biomarker in patients. Our results suggest that CYP2U1 deficiency disruptsmitochondrial function and impacts proper neurodevelopment, which could be prevented by folate supplementation in ourmouse model, followed by a neurodegenerative process altering multiple neuronal and extraneuronal tissues.

International audience; We describe a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and multiple concomitant thromboses occurring on the 9th day of hospital stay. Thromboses were found in distinct zones of the aorta, as well as in the renal, humeral, and pulmonary arteries. The extensive biological workup performed following this catastrophic thrombotic syndrome found no evidence for underlying prothrombotic disease. In light of current evidence regarding endothelium abnormalities related to COVID-19, this extreme case of catastrophic thrombotic syndrome suggests that COVID-19 can induce severe arterial thrombosis following intense endothelial activation.

Purpose Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE) is a recessive disorder involving skin, eyes and arteries, mainly caused by ABCC6 pathogenic variants. However, almost one fifth of patients remain genetically unsolved despite extensive genetic screening of ABCC6, as illustrated in a large French PXE series of 220 cases. We searched for new PXE gene(s) to solve the ABCC6-negative patients. Methods First, family-based exome sequencing was performed, in one ABCC6-negative PXE patient with additional neurological features, and her relatives. CYP2U1, involved in hereditary spastic paraplegia type 56 (SPG56), was selected based on this complex phenotype, and the presence of two candidate variants. Second, CYP2U1 sequencing was performed in a retrospective series of 46 additional ABCC6-negative PXE probands. Third, six additional SPG56 patients were evaluated for PXE skin and eye phenotype. Additionally, plasma pyrophosphate dosage and functional analyses were performed in some of these patients. Results 6.4% of ABCC6-negative PXE patients (n=3) harbored biallelic pathogenic variants in CYP2U1. PXE skin lesions with histological confirmation, eye lesions including maculopathy or angioid streaks, and various neurological symptoms were present. CYP2U1 missense variants were confirmed to impair protein function. Plasma pyrophosphate levels were normal. Two SPG56 patients (33%) presented some phenotypic overlap with PXE. Conclusion CYP2U1 pathogenic variants are found in unsolved PXE patients with neurological findings, including spastic paraplegia, expanding the SPG56 phenotype and highlighting its overlap with PXE. The pathophysiology of ABCC6 and CYP2U1 should be explored to explain their respective role and potential interaction in ectopic mineralization.

International audience; [No abstract available]

International audience

Marfan syndrome is a connective tissue disease that rarely presents first with peripheral aortic aneurysms. We highlight the case of a young man with Marfan syndrome presenting with an abdominal aortic aneurysm due to a heterozygous fibrillin-1 gene mutation.

Introduction Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is associated with a high incidence of thrombosis and mortality despite standard anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis. There is equipoise regarding the optimal dose of anticoagulant intervention in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and consequently, immediate answers from high-quality randomized trials are needed. Methods The World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform was searched on June 17, 2020 for randomized controlled trials comparing increased dose to standard dose anticoagulant interventions in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Two authors independently screened the full records for eligibility and extracted data in duplicate. Results A total of 20 trials were included in the review. All trials are open label, 5 trials use an adaptive design, 1 trial uses a factorial design, 2 trials combine multi-arm parallel group and factorial designs in flexible platform trials, and at least 15 trials have multiple study sites. With individual target sample sizes ranging from 30 to 3000 participants, the pooled sample size of all included trials is 12 568 participants. Two trials include only intensive care unit patients, and 10 trials base patient eligibility on elevated D-dimer levels. Therapeutic intensity anticoagulation is evaluated in 14 trials. All-cause mortality is part of the primary outcome in 14 trials. Discussion Several trials evaluate different dose regimens of anticoagulant interventions in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Because these trials compete for sites and study participants, a collaborative effort is needed to complete trials faster, conduct pooled analyses and bring effective interventions to patients more quickly.

The efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is discussed. Results from randomized controlled trials are available. It has been stated that a history of arterial thrombosis and triple positivity was associated with a higher risk of thrombosis in APS patients treated with DOACs. However, their efficacy in non-high-risk APS patients with isolated venous manifestations is unsolved. Therefore, we performed a sub-group analysis of a previously published meta-analysis after the exclusion of patients with triple positivity and those with history of arterial or small vessel thrombosis. We identified 290 APS patients with previous isolated venous event treated with DOACs; among them, 25 (8.6%) patients experienced a recurrent thrombosis in comparison to 16% in the original cohort. We found that the rate of recurrent thrombosis is lower in APS patients with isolated venous manifestations than in overall APS patients including high-risk patients. Research about DOAC use in non-high-risk APS patients needs to be continued.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can be seen as a burden, with consequences on patients’ daily life. Health has traditionally been measured using measures of morbidity or mortality. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a concept that includes quality of life through physical, mental, and social domains. As in other autoimmune diseases, HRQoL has been investigated in patients with APS. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the current knowledge of the assessment of HRQoL in APS. APS patients have an impaired HRQoL compared with the general population. The presence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in APS patients is associated with a worse HRQoL than in patients without SLE. Several determinants of HRQoL impairment in APS have been identified: age, gender, history of arterial thrombosis, organ damage, lack of social support and treatments. This review highlights the negative impact of thrombosis on APS patients’ HRQoL that should not be neglected. Besides, there is a need for a better strategy of communication and information, in order to improve HRQoL in APS.

Aims Patient-centered education improves glycemic control in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D). E-health technologies are widely used to support medical decision-making, patient advising or teleconsultations; however, the active participation of a patient is missing. Challenges remain whether e-health education can be effectively incorporated into clinical pathways. The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of e-health education, compared to standard care, on HbA1c. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a literature search (EMBASE, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science) up to February 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Internet-/ mobile application-based educational interventions, with the active involvement of patients, provided in addition to, or substituting usual care in patients with T1D on intensive insulin therapy. The primary outcome was the standardized difference in means (SDM) of HbA1c change from baseline between intervention and comparator groups. Results Eight RCTs involving 757 subjects were included on 6335 screened citations. After excluding two trials with a high risk of bias from the meta-analysis, the HbA1c change from baseline did not significantly differ between intervention and comparator groups (SDM = -0.154, 95% CI: -0.335 to 0.025; P = 0.01, random-effect model). The number of studies is limited with a relatively short duration. Reporting of educational outcomes was not rigorous. Conclusions The effect of e-health educational interventions on HbA1c in patients with T1D is comparable to the standard care. This review highlights the need for further well-designed RCTs that will investigate the opportunities of incorporating e-health education into clinical pathways.

Objective Although systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the most common autoimmune disease associated with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), limited data exist regarding the impact of SLE on the clinical phenotype of aPL-positive patients. The primary objective of this study was to compare the clinical, laboratory, and treatment characteristics of aPL-positive patients with SLE with those of aPL-positive patients without SLE. Methods A secure web-based data capture system was used to store patient demographic characteristics and aPL-related clinical and laboratory characteristics. Inclusion criteria included positive aPL according to the updated Sapporo classification criteria. Antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification of SLE ("aPL with SLE") and those with no other autoimmune diseases ("aPL only") were included in the analysis. Results Six hundred seventy-two aPL-positive patients were recruited from 24 international centers; 426 of these patients did not have other autoimmune disease, and 197 had SLE. The frequency of thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, low complement levels, and IgA anti-β2 -glycoprotein I (anti-β2 GPI) antibodies was higher in the aPL-positive patients with SLE, whereas the frequency of cognitive dysfunction and IgG anti-β2 GPI antibodies was higher in the aPL-only group. The frequency of arterial and venous thromboses (including recurrent) as well as pregnancy morbidity was similar in the 2 groups. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors at the time of entry into the registry entry did not differ between the 2 groups, with the exception of current smoking, which was more frequent in aPL-positive patients with SLE. Conclusion Although the frequencies of thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity are similar in aPL-positive patients with and those without SLE, the diagnosis of SLE in patients with persistently positive aPL is associated with an increased frequency of thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, low complement levels, and positive IgA anti-β2 GPI antibodies.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) but their clinical efficacy and safety are not established in Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) patients. There is only one randomized controlled trial published while others are still ongoing. Many non-randomized studies have been published in this field with conflicting opinions.We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from 2000 until March 2018 regarding APS patients treated with DOACs. We performed a patient-level data meta-analysis to a) estimate the prevalence of recurrent thrombosis in APS patients treated with DOACs in the literature, and b) identify variables associated with recurrent thrombosis.We identified 47 studies corresponding to 447 APS patients treated with DOACs. Three commercially available DOACs were analyzed: rivaroxaban (n = 290), dabigatran etexilate (n = 144) and apixaban (n = 13). A total of 73 out of 447 patients (16%) experienced a recurrent thrombosis while on DOACs with a mean duration until thrombosis of 12.5 months. Rates of recurrent thromboses were 16.9% and 15% in APS patients receiving either anti-Xa inhibitors or dabigatran respectively. Triple positivity (positivity for all three antiphospholipid antibodies) was associated with a four-fold increased risk of recurrent thrombosis (56% vs 23%; OR = 4.3 [95%CI; 2.3-7.7], p 0.0001) as well as a higher number of clinical criteria for APS classification. In patients treated with anti-Xa inhibitors, history of arterial thrombosis was associated with a higher risk of recurrent thrombosis (32% vs 14%; OR = 2.8 [95%CI; 1.4-5.7], p = 0.006). In conclusion, DOACs are not effective in all APS patients and should not be used routinely in these patients. Randomized controlled trials assessing clinical efficacy and safety as primary endpoints are underway. In the meantime, a registry of APS patients on DOACs could be proposed to establish in which APS subgroups DOACs would be a safe alternative to warfarin.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a condition in which the presence of antibodies against phospholipid-binding proteins is associated with thrombophilia and/or pregnancy morbidity. Although antiphospholipid antibodies have anticoagulant characteristics in vitro, they are associated with thromboembolic complications. Thrombin generation (TG) is a sensitive global test of coagulation, and elevated TG is associated with thrombosis. Increased TG can be caused by increased prothrombin conversion, decreased thrombin inactivation, or a combination of both. In this study, we measured TG in APS patients and healthy controls with and without vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at 1 and 5 pM tissue factor and with thrombomodulin. Prothrombin conversion and thrombin inactivation were determined by thrombin dynamics analysis. The TG peak was increased in nontreated APS patients at 1 pM TF compared with nontreated controls. Prothrombin conversion was significantly increased in nontreated APS patients. In contrast, prothrombin conversion did not differ in controls and patients that were on VKA therapy. Thrombin inactivation was comparable between controls and APS patients in the presence and absence of VKAs. Both TG (peak and ETP) and prothrombin conversion were significantly higher in APS patients with prior thrombosis compared with patients without a history of thrombosis. In this study, we demonstrate that in APS, the hemostatic balance shifts toward a more prothrombotic phenotype due to elevated prothrombin conversion but unchanged thrombin inactivation rates. Within the group of APS patients, increased TG and prothrombin conversion are associated with a history of thrombosis.

Background According to criteria for the classification of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), autoimmune hemolytic anemia is one of the disease-defining hematologic disorders together with thrombocytopenia. Since the recognition of Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS), hemolytic anemia was frequently reported but several studies yielded contradictory results on the association between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and hemolytic anemia. Therefore, we evaluated the association of aPL and autoimmune hemolytic anemia in SLE patients by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, congress abstracts, and reference lists of eligible studies were searched from 1987 to 2020. Studies were selected if they included SLE patients with descriptions of exposure to aPL and occurrence of hemolytic anemia. Three reviewers extracted study characteristics and association data from published reports. Risk estimates were pooled using random effects models and sensitivity analyses. We followed the PRISMA guidelines for all stages of the meta-analysis (Supplemental Table). PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015027376. Results From 3555 articles identified, 38 studies met inclusion criteria and included 8286 SLE patients. 20.5% of aPL-positive SLE patients had hemolytic anemia compared to 8.7% in aPL-negative SLE patients. The overall pooled Odds Ratio (OR) for hemolytic anemia in aPL positive patients was 2.83 (95% CI; 2.12–3.79). Among aPL subtypes, the risk of hemolytic anemia was highest for lupus anticoagulant (OR = 3.37 [95% CI; 2.26–5.04]) and, antiβ2Glycoprotein I antibodies (OR = 3.21 [95% CI; 1.54–6.72]), especially IgM antiβ2Glycoprotein I (OR = 3.01 [95% CI; 1.26, 7.24]). Conclusions The occurrence of hemolytic anemia was strongly associated with presence of aPL in SLE patients. Interestingly, IgM isotypes indicate an increased risk of hemolytic anemia in SLE.