Search

Abstract The standard treatment guideline for stage IIIA/N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial despite years of research, and the necessity of surgery is still debated. This study aims to explore optimal treatment and surgical methods for stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients. We obtained data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR) to compare the overall survival rates of different subgroups of stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients, as well as the overall survival rates of different treatment strategies and surgical methods. Our study included 2,237 stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy led to significantly higher survival rates. For T1N2 patients, surgery alone showed better survival (P

Abstract Background Currently, there is no consensus on the role of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) for resected stage IIIA/N2 non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study sought to determine which patients may be able to benefit from PORT, based on a patient prognostic score. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify patients diagnosed with IIIA/N2 NSCLC between 1988 and 2016 in the SEER database. Eligible patients were divided into the following two groups: PORT group and non‐PORT group. We classified patient prognostic scores as an ordinal factor and stratified patients based on prognostic scores. A Cox proportional hazards model with propensity score weighting was performed to evaluate cancer‐specific mortality (CSM) between the two groups. Results We identified 7060 eligible patients with IIIA/N2 NSCLC, 2833 (40.1%) in the PORT group and 4227 (59.9%) in the non‐PORT group. Overall, the 10‐year CSM rate in the weighted cohorts was 70.4% in the PORT group, 72.0% in the non‐PORT group, and patients who received PORT had a lower CSM rate (p = 0.001). Compared with the non‐PORT group, significant survival improvements in the PORT group were observed in patients with higher age, grade, T stage and lymph node ratio (LNR), and without chemotherapy. The improved survival of patients receiving PORT was significantly correlated with patient prognostic scores (p

Objectives: Various blood inflammatory biomarkers were associated with treatment response and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in previous studies. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the prognostic role of pretreatment blood inflammatory biomarkers and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients with trimodality therapy. Methods: Completely resected stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients with adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) were assessed in this study. Cutoff values of blood inflammatory factors were calculated by the R package SurvivalROC of R software. SPSS Statistics software was used for survival analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test were used to compare the survival difference between every two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses of predictive factors were performed by Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: The univariate analysis showed that T stage (p=0.007), EGFR mutation status (p=0.043), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (p=0.067), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) (p=0.043) were significant prognostic factors of disease-free survival (DFS). In the multivariate analysis, T2 (HR=0. 885, 95% CI: 0.059-0.583, p=0.004), EGFR mutation-positive (HR=0.108, 95% CI: 0.023-0.498, p=0.004) and elevated pretreatment SII (HR=0.181, 95%CI: 0.046-0.709, p=0.014) were independently related to shorter DFS. High pretreatment neutrophil counts (HR=0.113, p=0.019) and high systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) (HR=0.123, p=0.025) were correlated with worse overall survival (OS) by the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, only high pretreatment SIRI was an independent predictor for poorer OS (HR=0.025, 95% CI: 0.001-0.467, p=0.014). Conclusions: In conclusion, we identified that high pretreatment SII and SIRI were unfavorable prognostic factors in stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients treated with surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and PORT. Patients with high pretreatment SII, high pretreatment SIRI, T2, and EGFR mutation-positive may need more forceful adjuvant treatment. Further prospective studies with large-scale are needed to validate our results and identify the proper cut-off values and optimum adjuvant treatment for distinct patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectivesVarious blood inflammatory biomarkers were associated with treatment response and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in previous studies. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the prognostic role of pretreatment blood inflammatory biomarkers and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients with trimodality therapy.MethodsCompletely resected stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients with adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) were assessed in this study. Cutoff values of blood inflammatory factors were calculated by the R package SurvivalROC of R software. SPSS Statistics software was used for survival analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test were used to compare the survival difference between every two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses of predictive factors were performed by Cox proportional hazards regression model.ResultsThe univariate analysis showed that T stage (p=0.007), EGFR mutation status (p=0.043), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (p=0.067), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) (p=0.043) were significant prognostic factors of disease-free survival (DFS). In the multivariate analysis, T2 (HR=0. 885, 95% CI: 0.059-0.583, p=0.004), EGFR mutation-positive (HR=0.108, 95% CI: 0.023-0.498, p=0.004) and elevated pretreatment SII (HR=0.181, 95%CI: 0.046-0.709, p=0.014) were independently related to shorter DFS. High pretreatment neutrophil counts (HR=0.113, p=0.019) and high systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) (HR=0.123, p=0.025) were correlated with worse overall survival (OS) by the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, only high pretreatment SIRI was an independent predictor for poorer OS (HR=0.025, 95% CI: 0.001-0.467, p=0.014).ConclusionsIn conclusion, we identified that high pretreatment SII and SIRI were unfavorable prognostic factors in stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients treated with surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and PORT. Patients with high pretreatment SII, high pretreatment SIRI, T2, and EGFR mutation-positive may need more forceful adjuvant treatment. Further prospective studies with large-scale are needed to validate our results and identify the proper cut-off values and optimum adjuvant treatment for distinct patient population.

Background: Currently, there is no consensus on the role of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) for resected stage IIIA/N2 non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study sought to determine which patients may be able to benefit from PORT, based on a patient prognostic score. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify patients diagnosed with IIIA/N2 NSCLC between 1988 and 2016 in the SEER database. Eligible patients were divided into the following two groups: PORT group and non‐PORT group. We classified patient prognostic scores as an ordinal factor and stratified patients based on prognostic scores. A Cox proportional hazards model with propensity score weighting was performed to evaluate cancer‐specific mortality (CSM) between the two groups. Results: We identified 7060 eligible patients with IIIA/N2 NSCLC, 2833 (40.1%) in the PORT group and 4227 (59.9%) in the non‐PORT group. Overall, the 10‐year CSM rate in the weighted cohorts was 70.4% in the PORT group, 72.0% in the non‐PORT group, and patients who received PORT had a lower CSM rate (p = 0.001). Compared with the non‐PORT group, significant survival improvements in the PORT group were observed in patients with higher age, grade, T stage and lymph node ratio (LNR), and without chemotherapy. The improved survival of patients receiving PORT was significantly correlated with patient prognostic scores (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In our population‐based study, the prognostic score was associated with the survival improvement offered by PORT in IIIA/N2 NSCLC, suggesting that prognostic scores and clinicopathological characteristics may be helpful in proper candidate selection for PORT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The treatment choice for completely resected stage IIIA/N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is still controversial now. Our study aims to identify potential prognostic factors in stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients with complete surgical resection and postoperative chemotherapy. Methods: In this study, we screened the stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients diagnosed in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from 2015 to 2019. Completely resected patients with postoperative chemotherapy (PCT) were enrolled. The univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify the prognostic factors. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the subgroup analyses. Results: 180 patients were collected, including 142 patients with PCT treatment alone and 38 patients with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) treatment. The median DFS was 17.8 months (95% CI: 16.5-19.1 months) and the median OS was 50.6 months (47.4-53.9 months) in all the patients. The median DFS of the PORT group was significantly longer than the PCT group (38.7 vs 16.7 months, p < 0.001). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive patients had a worse DFS compared with EGFR mutation-negative patients (16.8 vs 18.0 months, p = 0.032). Possible prognostic factors were evaluated through univariate COX regression analysis. The further multivariate COX regression analysis showed that patients with PORT (HR: 0.318, 95% CI: 0.185-0.547, p < 0.001), EGFR mutation-negative (HR: 0.678, 95% CI: 0.492-0.990, p = 0.044), T1 (HR: 0.661, 95% CI: 0.472-0.925, p = 0.016), and lobectomy (HR: 0.423, 95% CI: 0.191-0.935, p = 0.034), had better DFS. The only independent prognostic factor of OS was the type of surgery ( p = 0.013). Conclusion: PORT might improve the DFS of stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients with complete surgical resection and PCT, but it cannot increase OS. Besides, EGFR mutation status, T stage, and type of surgery are possible independent prognostic factors for DFS, and type of surgery is associated with OS. These factors remain to be clarified in further studies., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Yang, Wang, Li, Li and Yuan.)