Search

Purpose: The aim of this study was accuracy assessment of placed implants in full-arch cases using specific software and hardware to perform static computer-assisted implantology and immediately loaded prostheses. The degree of deviation existing between planned and achieved implants was carried out by a new noninvasive measurement procedure of the implant position performed on stone casts. Materials and Methods: Fourteen stone casts retrieved from 14 full-arch fully guided implant treatments were selected to perform the study. Each cast, manufactured for the surgical treatment by using a specific laboratory kit, was obtained from the respective surgical guide. A sleeve for each implant was embedded into the guide, which helped the examiners to manufacture a stone cast per guide containing the implant analogs, which was used to recover the final position of the planned implants. A total sample of 60 implants were assessed. The postoperative casts, poured to produce the immediate prostheses, were then processed by a contact (or tactile) scanner, and the generated standard tessellation language (STL) files were overlapped (best-fit alignment) using engineering software that revealed all the measured discrepancies. In terms of accuracy, differences relating to arch, assessed bone quality, implant length, and drill length (prolongation short or long) were reported. Results: The use of a noninvasive tactile scanner revealed mean entry point horizontal deviations of 0.30 mm (SD: 0.39 mm), mean entry point vertical deviations of 0.20 mm (SD: 0.25 mm), mean apical horizontal deviations of 0.50 mm (SD: 0.73 mm), and mean apical vertical deviations of 0.24 mm (SD: 0.28 mm). The frontal and lateral angular deviations were investigated, and corresponding mean values of 1.99 degrees (SD: 2.30 degrees) and 1.80 degrees (SD: 2.44 degrees) were detected. Conclusion: The reported results demonstrate that the contact tactile scan is a viable and biologic way to assess implant deviations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide and to determine the influence of surgical management of the guide (fixed or unfixed), arch (maxilla or mandible), and smoking habit (normal or hyperplastic mucosa) on accuracy., Materials and Methods: In completely edentulous subjects, preoperative computed tomography (CT) was performed, and the images were used to plan implant positions. After the implants were placed, CT was performed again, and the presurgical and postoperative images were compared. With computer software, the jaw contours from the two CT scans were matched and the deviations between the planned and actual implant positions were evaluated. Surgical technique, arch, and smoking habit were examined as independent variables, and their influence on accuracy was evaluated with a t test., Results: Twenty-eight surgical guides (225 implants) were included in this study. Deviations between planned and actual positions were seen in the global coronal (mean±SD: 1.68±0.6 mm), global apical (2.19 ± 0.83 mm), and angular (4.67 ± 2.68 degrees) dimensions. Fixation of surgical guides (fixed: 4.09 degrees; not fixed: 5.62 degrees) and use of the guide in the maxilla (4.36 degrees; mandible: 5.46 degrees) resulted in statistically significantly less angular deviation (ie, better accuracy). Nonsmoking patients showed statistically significantly better accuracy in global coronal (nonsmokers: 1.54 mm; smokers: 1.83 mm) and global apical (nonsmokers: 2.08 mm; smokers: 2.27 mm) deviations., Conclusion: The greater supporting surface of the maxilla and fixation of the surgical guide improved the accuracy of the guides. The reduced mucosa thickness in nonsmokers decreased global coronal and global apical deviation.