Search

Background: Readmission within 30 days after hospitalization for heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem., Objective: To examine whether timing and type of post-discharge follow-up impacts risk of 30-day readmission in adults hospitalized for HF., Design: Nested matched case-control study (January 1, 2006-June 30, 2013)., Setting: A large, integrated health care delivery system in Northern California., Participants: Hospitalized adults with a primary diagnosis of HF discharged to home without hospice care., Measurements: Outpatient visits and telephone calls with cardiology and general medicine providers in non-emergency department and non-urgent care settings were counted as follow-up care. Statistical adjustments were made for differences in patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, acute severity of illness, hospitalization characteristics, and post-discharge medication changes and laboratory testing., Results: Among 11,985 eligible adults, early initial outpatient contact within 7 days after discharge was associated with lower odds of readmission [adjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94], whereas later outpatient contact between 8 and 30 days after hospital discharge was not significantly associated with readmission (adjusted OR=0.99; 95% CI, 0.82-1.19). Initial contact by telephone was associated with lower adjusted odds of 30-day readmission (adjusted OR=0.85; 95% CI, 0.69-1.06) but was not statistically significant., Conclusions: In adults discharged to home after hospitalization for HF, outpatient follow-up with a cardiology or general medicine provider within 7 days was associated with a lower chance of 30-day readmission.

Aldosterone receptor antagonists have been shown in randomized trials to reduce morbidity and mortality in adults with symptomatic systolic heart failure. We studied the effectiveness and safety of spironolactone in adults with newly diagnosed systolic heart failure in clinical practice. We identified all adults with newly diagnosed heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction of <40%, and no previous spironolactone use from 2006 to 2008 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We excluded patients with baseline serum creatinine level of >2.5 mg/dl or a serum potassium level of >5.0 mEq/L. We used Cox regression with time-varying covariates to evaluate the independent association between spironolactone use and death, hospitalization, severe hyperkalemia, and acute kidney injury. Among 2,538 eligible patients with a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 521 patients (22%) initiated spironolactone, which was not associated with risk of hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 1.08) or death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.93, confidence interval 0.60 to 1.44). Crude rates of severe hyperkalemia and acute kidney injury during spironolactone use were similar to that seen in clinical trials. Spironolactone was independently associated with a 3.5-fold increased risk of hyperkalemia but not with acute kidney injury. Within a diverse community-based cohort with incident systolic heart failure, use of spironolactone was not independently associated with risks of hospitalization or death. Our findings suggest that the benefits of spironolactone in clinical practice may be reduced compared with other guideline-recommended medications., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Initial success of electrical cardioversion (ECV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported in several studies as 50%-90%, of which only 50% patients remain in sinus rhythm (SR) at the end of one year. We conducted this study to see if outcomes of other trials are applicable in managed care setting., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in 370 consecutive patients who underwent ECV for AF. They were reviewed for initial outcome of ECV and recurrence of AF after a successful ECV, with and without prophylactic antiarrhythmic drugs., Results: Initial success of ECV for AF was 65.7%. At one year, 47% remained in SR. AF for

Heart failure accounts for more hospitalizations among Medicare beneficiaries than any other condition. Its symptoms, including shortness of breath, fatigue, and edema, can be frightening and diminish quality of life. Although treatment advances have allowed patients to live longer with a better quality of life, heart failure remains a leading cause of death in the United States. Half of heart failure patients die within 5 years of diagnosis, and for many patients, death is sudden. Given the availability of effective treatments, the prevalence of distressing symptoms, and a persistent high risk of death that may occur suddenly, physicians must simultaneously treat the underlying condition while helping patients plan for future needs and complete advance directives. Using the case of Mr R, a 74-year-old man with heart failure, we illustrate ways that physicians can address these issues to improve the care of patients with heart failure, including symptom management and discussing advance directives, prognosis, and hospice care. By combining optimal medical management with palliative care, physicians can best care for heart failure patients and their families.

Objectives: To assess the impact of a comprehensive heart failure management program, functional status, hospital readmission rate and estimated hospital costs were determined and compared for the 6 months before and the 6 months after referral., Background: The course of advanced heart failure is characterized by progressive clinical deterioration reflected in frequent hospital admissions, which comprise the major financial cost., Methods: Over a 3-year period, 214 patients were accepted for heart transplantation and discharged after evaluation, which included adjustments in medical therapy and intensive patient education. Patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV (94 and 120 patients, respectively), with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.21, peak oxygen consumption of 11 ml/kg per min and a total of 429 hospital admissions in the previous 6 months (average 2.0 per patient). Changes in the medical regimen included a 98% increase in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor dose and a flexible diuretic regimen after 4.2-liter net diuresis, with counseling also regarding diet and progressive exercise., Results: During the 6 months after referral, there were only 63 hospital readmissions (85% reduction), with 0.29/patient (p < 0.0001). Functional status improved as assessed by functional class (p < 0.0001) and peak oxygen consumption (15.2 vs. 11.0 ml/kg per min, p < 0.001). The same results were seen after excluding the 35 patients without full 6-month follow-up (9 deaths, 14 urgent transplant procedures during hospital readmission, 12 elective transplant procedures from home); 34 hospital admissions occurred after referral, compared with 344 before referral. Even when adding in the initial hospital admission after referral for these 179 patients, there was a 35% decrease in total hospital admissions in the 6-month period. The estimated savings in hospital readmission costs after subtracting the initial hospital costs for management was $9,800 per patient., Conclusions: Comprehensive heart failure management led to improved functional status and an 85% decrease in the hospital admission rate for transplant candidates discharged after evaluation. The potential to reduce both symptoms and costs suggests that referral to a heart failure program may be appropriate not only for potential heart transplantation, but also for medical management of persistent functional class III and IV heart failure.

Background: During therapy to relieve congestion in advanced heart failure, cardiac filling pressures can frequently be reduced to near-normal levels with improved cardiac output. It is not known whether the early hemodynamic improvement and drug response can be maintained long term., Methods and Results: After referral for cardiac transplantation with initially severe hemodynamic decompensation, 25 patients survived without transplantation to undergo hemodynamic reassessment after 8+/-6 months of treatment tailored to early hemodynamic response. Initial changes included net diuresis, increased ACE inhibitor doses, and frequent addition of nitrates. After 8 months of therapy, early reductions were sustained for pulmonary wedge pressure (24+/-9 to 15+/-5 mm Hg early; 12+/-6 mm Hg late) and systemic vascular resistance (1651+/-369 to 1207+/-281 dynes x s(-1) x cm(-5) early; 1003+/-193 dynes x s(-1) x cm(-5) late). Acute response to doses persisted at reevaluation. Sustained reduction in filling pressures was accompanied by a progressive increase in stroke volume (42+/-10 to 56+/-13 mL early; 79+/-20 mL late), improved functional class, and freedom from resting symptoms. Study design did not control for amiodarone, which was initiated for arrhythmias in 12 patients and associated with greater improvement in cardiac index (1.8 to 3.2 L min(-1) x m(-2) late on amiodarone versus 2.0 to 2.6 L x min(-1) x m(-2), P<.05)., Conclusions: During chronic therapy tailored to early hemodynamic response in advanced heart failure, acute vasodilator response persists, and near-normal filling pressures can be maintained in patients who survive without transplantation. Stroke volumes at low filling pressures increase further over time. Chronic hemodynamic improvement was accompanied by symptomatic improvement, but the contributions of the monitored hemodynamic approach, increased vasodilator doses, and comprehensive outpatient management have not yet been established.

Objectives: This study determined the frequency of improvement in peak oxygen uptake and its role in reevaluation of candidates awaiting heart transplantation., Background: Ambulatory candidates for transplantation usually wait > 6 months to undergo the procedure, and during this period symptoms may lessen, and peak oxygen uptake may improve. Whereas initial transplant candidacy is based increasingly on objective criteria, there are no established guidelines for reevaluation to determine who can leave the active waiting list., Methods: All ambulatory transplant candidates with initial peak oxygen uptake < 14 ml/kg per min were identified. Of 107 such patients listed, 68 survived without early deterioration or transplantation to undergo repeat exercise. A strategy of reevaluation using specific clinical criteria and exercise performance was tested to determine whether patients with improved oxygen uptake could safely be followed without transplantation., Results: In 38 of the 68 patients, peak oxygen uptake increased by > or = 2 ml/kg per min to a level > or = 12 ml/kg per min after 6 +/- 5 months, together with an increase in anaerobic threshold, peak oxygen pulse and exercise heart rate reserve and a decrease in heart rate at rest. Increased peak oxygen uptake was accompanied by stable clinical status without congestion in 31 of 38 patients, and these 31 were taken off the active waiting list. At 2 years, their actuarial survival rate was 100%, and the survival rate without relisting for transplantation was 85%., Conclusion: Reevaluation of exercise capacity and clinical status allowed removal of 31 (29%) of 107 ambulatory transplant candidates from the waiting list with excellent early survival despite low peak oxygen uptake on initial testing. The ability to increase peak oxygen uptake, particularly with increased peak oxygen pulse, may indicate improved prognosis as well as functional capacity and, in combination with stable clinical status, may be an indication to defer transplantation in favor of more compromised candidates.

Objectives: The purpose of this investigation was to determine how often left ventricular function improves in recent onset dilated cardiomyopathy of sufficient severity to cause referral for heart transplantation and how to predict this improvement at the time of evaluation for transplantation., Background: Improvement has been reported to occur frequently in patients with acute dilated cardiomyopathy but has not been described specifically in these patients referred for transplantation. To avoid potentially needless transplantation, it would be useful to know the frequency of improvement and how to predict it in these patients., Methods: A consecutive series of 297 patients with primary dilated cardiomyopathy evaluated for heart transplantation was reviewed to identify those with onset of heart failure symptoms within the preceding 6 months and to examine their outcome. The clinical, echocardiographic, hemodynamic and laboratory profiles of patients with improvement in left ventricular function (defined as an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction > or = 0.15 to a final ejection fraction of > or = 0.30) were compared with those of patients without improvement to assess which variables might predict improvement., Results: Of 49 patients with recent onset dilated cardiomyopathy, 13 (27%) showed improvement, with an increase in mean left ventricular ejection fraction from 0.22 +/- 0.08 to 0.49 +/- 0.09. All patients with improvement had survived without heart transplantation at 43 +/- 29 months. Survival time was shorter in the remaining 36 patients without improvement with recent onset cardiomyopathy than in the 248 with chronic symptoms (p = 0.03) and in younger compared with older patients with recent onset cardiomyopathy (p = 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, predictors of improvement were shorter duration of symptoms, lower pulmonary wedge and right atrial pressures and higher serum sodium levels., Conclusions: A minority of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and symptoms for < or = 6 months will have marked improvement in left ventricular function, after which prognosis is excellent despite previous referral for heart transplantation. Those with symptom duration > 3 months and more severe initial decompensation as reflected by higher filling pressures and lower serum sodium levels are unlikely to show improvement and may require earlier consideration for heart transplantation.

Background: Each month, the number of transplant candidates added to the waiting list exceeds the number of transplantations performed, and many outpatients deteriorate to require transplantation urgently. The current list of 2400 candidates and the average wait of 8 months continue to increase., Methods and Results: To determine the size at which the outpatient and critical candidate pools will stabilize, population models were constructed using current statistics for donor hearts, candidate listing, sudden death, and outpatient decline to urgent status and revised to predict the impact of alterations in policies of candidate listing. If current practices continue, within 48 months the predicted list will stabilize as the sum of an estimated 270 hospitalized candidates, among whom, together with newly listed urgent candidates, all hearts will be distributed and 3700 outpatient candidates with virtually no chance of transplantation unless they deteriorate to an urgent status. Decreasing the upper age limit now to 55 years would reduce the number listed each month by 30% and result within 48 months in a list of only 1490. The list could also be decreased by 30%, however, if it were possible to list only a candidate group with an 80% chance (compared with 52% estimated currently) of sudden death or deterioration during the next year. With this strategy, the waiting list would equilibrate within 48 months to one-third the current size, with 50% of hearts for outpatient candidates, who would then have an 11% chance each month of receiving a heart compared with 0% if recent policies prevail. Total deaths, with and without transplantation, would be minimized by this rigorous selection of outpatient candidates., Conclusions: This study implies that immediate provisions should be made to limit candidate listing and revise expectations to reflect the diminishing likelihood of transplantation for outpatient candidates. Future emphasis should be on improved selection of candidates at highest risk without transplantation.