Search

PurposeRisk factors for congenital upper limb differences (CoULDs) are often studied at the general population level. The CoULD registry provides a unique opportunity to study prenatal risk factors within a large patient sample.MethodsAll patients enrolled between June 2014 and March 2020 in the prospective CoULD registry, a national multicenter database of patients diagnosed with a CoULD, were included in the analysis. We analyzed self-reported, prenatal risk factors, including maternal smoking, alcohol use, recreational drug use, prescription drug use, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and gestational hypertension. The outcome measures included comorbid medical conditions, proximal involvement of limb difference, bilateral involvement, and additional orthopedic conditions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of the risk factors, controlling for sex and the presence of a named syndrome.ResultsIn total, 2,410 patients were analyzed, of whom 72% (1,734) did not have a self-reported risk factor. Among the 29% (676) who did have at least 1 risk factor, prenatal maternal prescription drug use was the most frequent (376/2,410; 16%). Maternal prescription drug use was associated with increased odds of patient medical comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] = 1.43, P = .02). Gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with increased odds of comorbid medical conditions (OR = 1.58, P = .04), additional orthopedic conditions (OR = 1.51, P = .04), and proximal involvement (OR = 1.52, P = .04). Overall, reporting 1 or more risk factors increased the odds of patient comorbid medical conditions (OR = 1.42, P < .001) and additional orthopedic conditions (OR = 1.25, P = .03).ConclusionsMost caregivers (72%) did not report a risk factor during enrollment. However, reporting a risk factor was associated with patient medical and orthopedic comorbidities. Of note, GDM alone significantly increased the odds of both these outcome measures along with proximal limb differences. These findings highlight the ill-defined etiology of CoULDs but suggest that prenatal risk factors, especially GDM, are associated with a higher degree of morbidity.Type of study/level of evidencePrognostic III.

To investigate the impact on caregivers of caring for a child with congenital upper extremity differences. In this cross-sectional study, caregivers of patients enrolled in the multi-institutional Congenital Upper Limb Difference (CoULD) registry were contacted. Demographic information and the Impact on Family Scale (IOFS), a validated measure of perceived caregiver strain, were collected. Patient-reported outcome measures from the CoULD registry, the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) were also analyzed for correlation with IOFS. Two hundred ninety-nine caregivers participated. Factors with significantly stronger impact on family included public insurance; bilateral upper extremity involvement; household income of $20,000-40,000; additional musculoskeletal diagnosis; and a single adult caregiver household. There was a significantly increased subcategory of IOFS-Finance score for distant travel to see the surgeon. Additionally, all categories of the PODCI (upper extremity, mobility, sports, pain, happiness, and global) demonstrated a negative correlation with IOFS. PROMIS upper extremity and peer relations also demonstrated an inverse relationship with IOFS, whereas PROMIS pain interference had a positive correlation with IOFS. The overall IOFS for children with CoULDs was greater than previously reported for children with brachial plexus birth injury, and less than cerebral palsy and congenital heart disease. Caregivers of children with congenital upper extremity differences report a significant impact on family life. Socioeconomic factors, such as economically disadvantaged or single-caregiver households, and clinical factors, such as bilateral upper extremity involvement, correlate with greater family impact. These findings represent opportunities to identify at-risk families and underscore the importance of caring for the whole family through a multidisciplinary approach. Prognostic II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether radiographs can be used to aid in the determination of Blauth IIIA and IIIB thumbs., Methods: Six pediatric hand surgeons were asked to evaluate the radiographs of 77 thumbs and classify the thumb as IIIA or IIIB and indicate which morphologic features influenced their decision. Quantitative measurements and ratios of radiographs were obtained and compared between IIIA and IIIB thumbs., Results: The radiographic features selected for type IIIA thumbs include near-normal length and near-normal width and for type IIIB thumbs, abnormally short, tapered proximal end, and round proximal end. The six surveyed surgeons reached consensus in 82% (63/77) of thumbs, and this matched the enrolling surgeon's classification in 77% (59/77) cases. The ratio of the length of the thumb metacarpal compared with the length of the index metacarpal was different between IIIA and IIIB thumbs (66% ± 0.08% and 46% ± 0.18%, respectively). The ratio of the width of the thumb metacarpal shaft at its narrowest aspect to the width of the thumb metacarpal base was notably different between IIIA and IIIB (68% ± 0.13% and 95% ± 0.28%, respectively)., Conclusions: Near-normal length and near-normal width of the metacarpal were used to predict IIIA and abnormally short, abnormally narrow, and a round or tapered base of the metacarpal were used to predict IIIB classification. The length of the thumb metacarpal relative to the index metacarpal is on average 66% of the length of the index metacarpal in IIIA thumbs compared with 46% in IIIB thumbs. The width of the shaft of the thumb metacarpal at its narrowest is 68% of the width of the thumb metacarpal base in IIIA thumbs, indicating a flared base. In IIIB thumbs, the shaft width was on average 95% of the base width, indicating a tapered base., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Diagnostic level III., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly to this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)