Search

Background The local treatment of extremity sarcomas usually is predicated on a decision between limb salvage and amputation. The manner in which surgical options are presented in the context of shared decision-making may influence this decision. In a population of "simulated" patients-survey respondents presented with a mock clinical vignette and then asked to choose between treatments-we assessed cognitive bias by deliberate alteration of the subjective presentation of the same objective information. Questions/purposes (1) Will the manner in which information is presented to a simulated patient, in the setting of treatment for a bone sarcoma, bias their decision regarding pursuing amputation versus limb salvage? (2) At the time of decision-making, will a simulated patient's personal background, demographics, or mood affect their ultimate decision? Methods Survey respondents (Amazon MTurk platform) were presented with mock clinical vignettes simulating a sarcoma diagnosis and were asked to choose between amputation and limb salvage. Specific iterations were designed to assess several described types of cognitive bias. These scenarios were distributed, using anonymous online surveys, to potential participants aged 18 years or older. Recruitment was geographically restricted to individuals in the United States. Overall, 404 respondents completed the survey. The average age of respondents was 33 years (SD 1.2 years), 60% were male and 40% were female. In all, 12% of respondents worked in healthcare. Each respondent also completed questions regarding his or her demographics and his or her current mood. Associations between the type of bias presented and the respondent's choice of limb salvage versus amputation were examined. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare means. Statistical significance was defined as p Results When amputation was presented as an option to mitigate functional loss (framing bias), more patients chose it than when limb salvage was presented as means for increased functional gains (23% [23 of 100] versus 10% [12 of 118], odds ratio [OR], 2.26; p = 0.010). Older simulated patients were more likely to choose limb salvage when exposed to framing bias versus younger patients (mean age 33 years versus 30 years, p = 0.02). Respondents who were employed in healthcare more commonly chose amputation versus limb salvage when exposed to framing bias (24% [eight of 35] versus 9% [17 of 183]; OR, 2.46; p = 0.02). Those who chose amputation were more likely to score higher on scales that measured depression or negative affect. Conclusions Shared decision-making in orthopaedic oncology represents a unique circumstance in which several variables may influence a patient's decision between limb salvage and amputation. Invoking cognitive bias in simulated patients appeared to affect treatment decisions. We cannot be sure that these findings translate to the experience of actual sarcoma patients; however, we can conclude that important treatment decisions may be affected by cognitive bias and that patient characteristics (in this study, age, healthcare profession, and mood) may be associated with an individual's susceptibility to cognitive bias. We hope these observations will assist providers in the thoughtful delivery of highly charged information to patients facing difficult decisions, and promote further study of this important concept. Level of evidence Level III, economic and decision analyses.

Men remain underrepresented in behavioral weight loss trials and are more difficult to recruit compared to women. We describe recruitment response of men and women into a mixed-gender behavioral weight loss trial conducted within 36 rural primary care clinics. Participants were recruited through primary care clinics via direct mailings ( n = 15,076) and in-clinic referrals by their primary care provider (PCP). Gender differences were examined in response rate to direct mailings, study referral source, and rates of proceeding to study screening, being eligible, and enrolling. Men had a lower response rate to direct mailings than women (7.8% vs. 17.7%, p < .001). Men (vs. women) responding to the mailing were more likely to respond by opt-in postcard (64.6% vs. 56.8%) and less likely to respond by phone (33.9% vs. 39.6%), p = .002. Among potential participants contacting the study ( n = 2413), men were less likely to report being referred by PCPs (15.2% vs. 21.6%; p < .001), but were just as likely to proceed to screening, be eligible, and enroll. Men and women were more likely to proceed to screening when referred by PCPs (93.3% vs. 95.4%) compared to direct mailings (74.2% vs. 73.9%). Enrolled men were older ( p < .001), more likely to be married ( p = .04), and had higher levels of education ( p = .01). Men were less likely than women to respond to direct mailings and to be referred by their PCP, but after contacting the study, had similar screening, eligibility, and enrollment rates. Encouraging and training providers to refer men during clinic visits may help recruit more men into primary care-based weight loss trials.

Fifty-one youth athletes (n = 27 female, age = 14.53 years, SD = 1.85) presented to a local hospital outpatient concussion clinic on average 7.67 days postconcussion for standard medical assessment, including the self-report Sport-Concussion Assessment Tool-2 (Time 1). They completed follow-up sympt

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to test the validity of a consumer-oriented activity monitor in adolescents and young adults undergoing limb salvage for primary bone malignancies. METHODS A cross-sectional population of participants with an average age of 16 (range 12 to 22) years produced 472 days of activity monitoring during 25 evaluations periods alongside patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS Average daily steps ranged from 557 to 12,756 (mean=4711) and was moderately associated with the short-form (SF) 36 physical component subscale (r=0.46, P=0.04) as well as the SF6D health state utility measure (r=0.48, P=0.04), but not the SF36 mental component subscale (P=0.66) or Toronto extremity salvage score (P=0.07). Time from surgery was strongly correlated with average daily steps (r=0.7, P

Pediatric pelvic tumors are challenging because a surgeon must balance the challenges of treating a child, who is likely to have a better response to preoperative chemotherapy, with the challenges of resecting and reconstructing a tumor in the immature skeleton. Because young children typically have a far better preoperative chemotherapy response than most adults and young adults, they are often candidates for a smaller, more conservative tumor resection than the typical adult. The extent of the resection should be based on a careful preoperative assessment of the response to preoperative chemotherapy, as demonstrated by a comparison of preoperative MRI and PET scan imaging. Pediatric allografts can be an excellent reconstructive option for pelvic resections, which have a greater likelihood of healing in children. Patients under age 10 years may be candidates for nonoperative resection of their primary tumor because of a good response to chemotherapy. Surgical complications vary by multiple factors including tumor size, the type of resection and reconstruction, the age of patient, the length of the surgery and extent of surgical blood loss, and the surgeon’s experience. Tumor recurrence is a greater risk after pelvic resections than after extremity resections, and careful diligence in the documentation of operative margins is critical. Careful preoperative planning and preoperative discussions are an essential requirement for a good postoperative result.

BACKGROUND To improve and achieve adequate bony surgical margins, surgeons may consider computer-aided navigation a promising intraoperative tool, currently applied to a relatively few number of patients in whom freehand resections might be challenging. Placing fiducials (markers) in the bone, identifying specific anatomical landmarks, and registering patients for navigated resections are time consuming. To reduce the time both preoperatively and intraoperatively, skin fiducials may offer an efficient and alternative method of navigation registration. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Does preoperative navigation using skin fiducials for registration allow the surgeon to achieve margins similar to those from bone fiducial registration in a simulated lower extremity tumor resection model in cadavers? (2) Does the use of preoperative navigation using skin fiducials for registration allow the surgeon to achieve similar bony margins in pelvic resections of simulated tumors as those achieved in long-bone resections using only skin fiducials for navigation in a cadaver model? METHODS Simulated bone tumor resections were performed in three fresh-frozen cadavers with intact pelvic and lower-extremity anatomy using navigation guidance. We placed 5-cm intraosseous cement simulated bone tumors in the proximal/distal femur (n = 12), and proximal/distal tibia (n = 12) and pelvis (supraacetabular; n = 6). After bone tumor implantation, CT images of the pelvis and lower extremities were obtained. Each planned osseous resection margin was set at 10 mm. Navigation registration was performed for each simulated tumor using bone and skin markers that act as a point of reference (fiducials). The simulated bone tumor was resected based on a resection line that was established with navigation, and the corresponding osseous margins were calculated after resection. These margins were determined by an orthopaedic surgeon who was blinded to resection planning by the removal of cancellous bone around the cement simulated tumor. The shortest distance was measured from the cement to the resection line. Smaller mean differences between planned and postoperative margins were considered accurate. Independent t-tests were conducted to assess measurement differences between planned and postoperative margins at the 95% CI. Bland-Altman analyses were conducted to compare the deviation in margin difference between planned and postoperative margins in skin and bone fiducial registration, respectively. RESULTS In all, 84 total resection margins were measured with 48 long bone and 20 pelvic obtained with skin fiducials and 16 long bone obtained with bone fiducials. The planned mean margin was 10 mm for all long bone and pelvic resections. We found that skin fiducial and bone fiducial postoperative margins had comparable accuracy when resecting long bones (10 ± 2 mm versus 9 ± 2 mm, mean difference 1 [95% CI 0 to 2]; p = 0.16). Additionally, skin fiducial long bone postoperative margins were comparable in accuracy to pelvic supraacetabular postoperative margins obtained with skin fiducials (10 ± 2 mm versus 11 ± 3 mm, mean difference -1 mm [95% CI -3 to 1]; p = 0.22). When comparing the deviation in margin difference between planned and postoperative margins in skin and bone fiducial registration, 90% (61 of 68) of skin fiducial and 100% (16 of 16) bone fiducial postoperative margins fell within 2 SDs. CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study, skin fiducial markers were easy to identify on the skin surface of the cadaver model and on CT images used to plan margins. This technique appears to be an accurate way to plan margins in this model, but it needs to be tested thoroughly in patients to determine if it may be a better clinical approach than with bone fiducials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The margins obtained using skin fiducials and bone fiducials for registration were similar and comparable in this pilot study with a very small effect size. Boundaries of the simulated tumors were not violated in any resections. Skin fiducials are easier to identify than bone fiducials (anatomic landmarks). If future clinical studies demonstrate that margins obtained using skin fiducials for registration are similar to margins obtained with anatomical landmarks, the use of navigation with skin fiducials instead of bone fiducials may be advantageous. This technique may decrease the surgeon's time used to plan for and localize registration points and offer an alternative registration technique, providing the surgeon with other registration approaches.

BACKGROUND: The quantitative accuracy of MRI in predicting the intraosseous extent of primary sarcoma of bone has not been definitively confirmed, although MRI is widely accepted as an accurate tool to plan limb salvage resections. Because inaccuracies in MRI determination of tumor extent could affect the ability of a tumor surgeon to achieve negative margins and avoid local recurrence, we thought it important to assess the accuracy of MR-determined tumor extent to the actual extent observed pathologically from resected specimens in pediatric patients treated for primary sarcomas of bone. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does the quantitative pathologic bony margin correlate with that measured on preoperative MRI? (2) Are T1- or T2-weighted MRIs most accurate in determining a margin? (3) Is there a difference in predicting tumor extent between MRI obtained before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and which is most accurate? METHODS: We retrospectively studied a population of 211 potentially eligible patients who were treated with limb salvage surgery between August 1999 and July 2015 by a single surgeon at a single institution for primary sarcoma of bone. Of 131 patients (62%) with disease involving the femur or tibia, 107 (51%) were classified with Ewing’s sarcoma or osteosarcoma. Records were available for review in our online database for 79 eligible patients (37%). Twenty-six patients (12%) were excluded because of insufficient or unavailable clinical or pathology data and 17 patients (8%) were excluded as a result of inadequate or incomplete MR imaging, leaving 55 eligible participants (26%) in the final cohort. The length of the resected specimen was superimposed on preresection MRI sequences to compare the margin measured by MRI with the margin measured by histopathology. Arithmetic mean differences and Pearson r correlations were used to assess quantitative accuracy (size of the margin). RESULTS: All MR imaging types were positively associated with final histopathologic margin. T1-weighted MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and final histopathologic margin had the strongest positive correlation of all MR imaging and time point comparisons (r = 0.846, p < 0.001). Mean differences existed between the normal marrow margin on T1-weighted MRI before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (t = 8.363; mean, 18.883 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.327-23.441; p < 0.001), T2-weighted MRI before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (t = 8.194; mean, 17.204 mm; 95% CI, 12.970-21.439; p < 0.001), T1-weighted after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (t = 10.808; mean, 22.178 mm; 95% CI, 18.042-26.313; p < 0.001), T2-weighted after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (t = 10.702; mean, 20.778 mm; 95% CI, 16.865-24.691; p < 0.001), and the final histopathologic margin. T1-weighted MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with the final histopathologic margin had the smallest mean difference in MRI-measured versus histopathologic margin size (mean, 5.9 mm; SD = 4.5 mm). CONCLUSIONS: T1 MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy exhibited the strongest positive correlation and smallest mean difference compared with histopathologic margin. When planning surgical resections based on MRI obtained after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, for safety, one should account for a potential difference between the apparent margin of a tumor on an MRI and the actual pathologic margin of that tumor of up to 1 cm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Background: Allograft reconstruction of oncologic resections involving the tibia can have unpredictable results. Prior studies have reported a high rate of complications and a long recovery period involving prolonged bracing, repeated procedures and extended periods of antibiotics. Methods: The case details of 30 tibial allografts (12 adults, 18 children; 20 intercalary, 7 hemicortical, 3 other) were reviewed retrospectively. Based on factors including function, pain, healing and infection, clinical outcomes were stratified into three categories: excellent, moderate, and poor. Results: The overall survival rate of the allografts was 66% at a mean follow-up of 42 mos (adults) and 63 mos (children). Healing for metaphyseal junctions was successful in 73% at a mean of 44 weeks and for diaphyseal junctions, 64% at 41 weeks. Intercalary allografts in adults (4 of 20) all became infected and none had excellent results. All hemicortical allografts were performed in adults and 6 of 7 had excellent results. Distal intercalary allografts in children (6 of 20) had either excellent or moderate results with no infections, but had 3 nonunions and 2 fractures. Proximal intercalary allografts in children (8 of 20) had 2 excellent results, but had 6 infections requiring a cement spacer. Five of the six spacers were ultimately revised to another allograft or an arthroplasty. Conclusion: For tibial allograft reconstruction, surgeons and patients should prepare for a prolonged treatment course that may include multiple complications and surgeries. Excellent or moderate results can be achieved eventually in most, but amputation may be necessary in 15-20% of cases.

Leiomyosarcoma, a malignant neoplasm of smooth muscle, accounts for 7% of the sarcomas. Patients with leiomyosarcoma tumors have an average survival of 5 years. These tumors, which are derived from mesenchymal tissues, are difficult to diagnose, and treatment options remain controversial. The relatively rare incidence of this soft tissue sarcoma subtype has limited the number of patients available for studies and research. This study examines whether the imaging characteristics of positron emission tomography (PET) with radiolabeled fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) provide a reliable, noninvasive means to predict tumor behavior in patients with leiomyosarcomas.[18F]-FDG-PET was performed on the tumors of participating patients before the neoadjuvant chemotherapy or resection, and a maximum tumor standard uptake value (SUVmax) was calculated.The SUVmax was correlated with tumor grade (P=0.001) and tumor size as greatest dimension (P=0.004). Analysis of these data indicated the potential effectiveness of FDG-PET imaging in predicting tumor grade.In leiomyosarcoma, the SUVmax from FDG-PET is a likely predictor of tumor behavior. The results of this study suggest that a large (by greatest dimension) intermediate grade tumor is expected to have the same predicted outcome as a high-grade tumor and should be treated in the same manner, as they share the same prognosis by definition of tumor grade. Improvements made in the clinical treatment of leiomyosarcomas by use of FDG-PET imaging data may lead to an increase in patient survival.

The effect of simulated early weight bearing on both micromotion and pullout strength of uncemented distal femoral stems was evaluated in this study. The effect of stem endosteal contact and bone quality on implant pullout strength was also analyzed. A randomized matched-pair study was performed using 8 bilateral pairs of fresh human cadaveric femoral specimens. Each specimen pair was dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanned, uniformly implanted, fluoroscopically imaged, and randomly assigned to the cycled or uncycled group. The cycled group received 5000 cycles of axial compressive loading (to 700 N) and the contralateral side was not cycled. Micromotion was monitored during cycling and compared with a failure threshold (150 µm), and all implants underwent direct axial distraction (pullout) testing. During cycling, minimal micromotion was observed with an asymptotic decrease in differential motion between the first and last 50 cycles. Both cycled and uncycled groups demonstrated no statistical difference in average pullout force (4888±2124 N vs 4367±1154 N; P =.43). The percentage of cortical contact for each implant was determined from panoramic fluoroscopy images using digital image analysis software. Contact area for the distal third of the stem showed the highest correlation with pullout force and with predicting pullout force. Bone quality did not correlate with pullout force ( r 2 =0.367) or stem contact area ( r 2 =0.394). In sum, press-fit uncemented femoral stems did not loosen or demonstrate decreased pullout strength with early weight bearing simulated by cyclical axial compressive loading. [ Orthopedics. 2015; 38(5):e417–e422.]

Computer-aided surgery is used in musculoskeletal tumor procedures to improve the surgeon’s orientation to local anatomy during tumor resection. For the navigation system to function correctly, preoperative imaging (e.g., CT, MR) must be registered to the patient in the operating room. The goals of this study were (1) to directly quantify registration accuracy in computer-aided tumor surgery and (2) to validate the “system reported error” (SRE) of the navigation system. Registration accuracy was evaluated in eight bone sarcoma cases by determining the location of the anatomical paired-points used for registration following surface matching. Coordinates of specific intraoperative post-registration points were compared with the corresponding coordinates in preoperative CT scans to determine the measurement error (ME). The mean difference between post-registration points and planned registration points was $$12.21 \pm 6.52\,\hbox {mm}$$ , significantly higher than the mean SRE ( $$0.68 \pm 0.15\,\hbox {mm}$$ ; $$p=0.002$$ ; 95 % CI 6.11–16.96 mm). The SRE poorly correlated with the calculated ME ( $$R^2=0.040$$ ). Anatomical paired-point registration with surface matching results in a substantial shift in the post-registration coordinates of the same paired-points used for registration, and this shift is not represented by the SRE. The SRE of a surgical navigation system was poorly correlated with direct measurements obtained in musculoskeletal tumor surgery. Improvement in registration accuracy is needed to better navigate tumor boundaries and ensure clear margins while maximally preserving the unaffected tissues and reducing operative morbidity.

In addition to patient reported outcome measures, accelerometers may provide useful information on the outcome of sarcoma patients treated with limb salvage. The StepWatch (SW) Activity Monitor (SAM) is a two-dimensional accelerometer worn on the ankle that records an objective measure of walking performance. The purpose of this study was to validate the SW in a cross-sectional population of adult patients with lower extremity sarcoma treated with limb salvage. The main outcome was correlation of total steps with the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). In a sample of 29 patients, a mean of 12 days of SW data was collected per patient (range 6–16), with 2767 average total steps (S.D. 1867; range 406–7437). There was a moderate positive correlation between total steps and TESS(r=0.56, P=0.002). Patients with osseous tumors walked significantly less than those with soft tissue sarcoma (1882 versus 3715,P<0.01). This study supports the validity of the SAM as an activity monitor for the objective assessment of real world physical function in sarcoma patients.

Aim. Health state utilities measures are preference-weighted patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments that facilitate comparative effectiveness research. One such measure, the SF-6D, is generated from the Short Form 36 (SF-36). This report describes a psychometric evaluation of the SF-6D in a cross-sectional population of lower extremity sarcoma patients.Methods. Patients with lower extremity sarcoma from a prospective database who had completed the SF-36 and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) were eligible for inclusion. Computed SF-6D health states were given preference weights based on a prior valuation. The primary outcome was correlation between the SF-6D and TESS.Results. In 63 pairs of surveys in a lower extremity sarcoma population, the mean preference-weighted SF-6D score was 0.59 (95% CI 0.4–0.81). The distribution of SF-6D scores approximated a normal curve (skewness = 0.11). There was a positive correlation between the SF-6D and TESS (r=0.75,P<0.01). Respondents who reported walking aid use had lower SF-6D scores (0.53 versus 0.61,P=0.03). Five respondents underwent amputation, with lower SF-6D scores that approached significance (0.48 versus 0.6,P=0.06).Conclusions. The SF-6D health state utilities measure demonstrated convergent validity without evidence of ceiling or floor effects. The SF-6D is a health state utilities measure suitable for further research in sarcoma patients.