1. <scp>Lack of Alignment Between WHO Joint External Evaluation and State Party Self-Assessment Scores Undermines Utility as Evaluation Tools for the Department of Defense</scp>
- Author
-
Alexandra B, Stone, Alden L, Weg, Stephanie R, Petzing, Amber, Rollings, and Christopher L, Perdue
- Subjects
Self-Assessment ,Health (social science) ,International Cooperation ,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,COVID-19 ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,Global Health ,World Health Organization ,Disease Outbreaks ,Emergency Medicine ,Humans ,Public Health ,Safety Research - Abstract
The International Health Regulations 2005 (IHR) set standards for countries to detect and respond to public health threats such as COVID-19. The US Department of Defense engages with partner nations to build IHR-related health security capacities. In this article, we compare 2 elements of the IHR Monitoring and Evaluation Framework to determine if they align in a useful way. The version of the State Party Self-Assessment Annual Reporting (SPAR) tool used for this study is a self-assessment of 13 capacities, while the Joint External Evaluation (JEE) requires collaboration with international subject matter experts to evaluate 19 capacities. The SPAR indicators are scored separately from 0% to 100%, whereas the JEE uses a rank-ordered scale from 1 to 5 for variable numbers of indicators in each capacity. Using 2018-2019 data from the World Health Organization, we quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated the alignment of the SPAR and JEE scoring systems, using paired
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF