Search

HORMAD1 expression is usually restricted to germline cells, but it becomes mis-expressed in epithelial cells in ~60% of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs), where it is associated with elevated genomic instability (1). HORMAD1 expression in TNBC is bimodal with HORMAD1-positive TNBC representing a biologically distinct disease group. Identification of HORMAD1-driven genetic dependencies may uncover novel therapies for this disease group. To study HORMAD1-driven genetic dependencies, we generated a SUM159 cell line model with doxycycline-inducible HORMAD1 that replicated genomic instability phenotypes seen in HORMAD1-positive TNBC (1). Using small interfering RNA screens, we identified candidate genes whose depletion selectively inhibited the cellular growth of HORMAD1-expressing cells. We validated five genes (ATR, BRIP1, POLH, TDP1 and XRCC1), depletion of which led to reduced cellular growth or clonogenic survival in cells expressing HORMAD1. In addition to the translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerase POLH, we identified a HORMAD1-driven dependency upon additional TLS polymerases, namely POLK, REV1, REV3L and REV7. Our data confirms that out-of-context somatic expression of HORMAD1 can lead to genomic instability and reveals that HORMAD1 expression induces dependencies upon replication stress tolerance pathways, such as translesion synthesis. Our data also suggest that HORMAD1 expression could be a patient selection biomarker for agents targeting replication stress.

Supplementary Figures

Normal cytokinesis in E-cadherin defective cell exposed to vehicle

Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergy between PARP and PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2)–deficient and BRCA1/2-proficient tumors. We conducted an investigator-initiated phase I trial utilizing a prospective intrapatient dose- escalation design to assess two schedules of capivasertib (AKT inhibitor) with olaparib (PARP inhibitor) in 64 patients with advanced solid tumors. Dose expansions enrolled germline BRCA1/2-mutant tumors, or BRCA1/2 wild-type cancers harboring somatic DNA damage response (DDR) or PI3K–AKT pathway alterations. The combination was well tolerated. Recommended phase II doses for the two schedules were: olaparib 300 mg twice a day with either capivasertib 400 mg twice a day 4 days on, 3 days off, or capivasertib 640 mg twice a day 2 days on, 5 days off. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional. Pharmacodynamic studies confirmed phosphorylated (p) GSK3β suppression, increased pERK, and decreased BRCA1 expression. Twenty-five (44.6%) of 56 evaluable patients achieved clinical benefit (RECIST complete response/partial response or stable disease ≥ 4 months), including patients with tumors harboring germline BRCA1/2 mutations and BRCA1/2 wild-type cancers with or without DDR and PI3K–AKT pathway alterations.Significance:In the first trial to combine PARP and AKT inhibitors, a prospective intrapatient dose- escalation design demonstrated safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic activity and assessed predictive biomarkers of response/resistance. Antitumor activity was observed in patients harboring tumors with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and BRCA1/2 wild-type cancers with or without somatic DDR and/or PI3K–AKT pathway alterations.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1426

Supplementary Tables 1-7; Supplementary Figures 1-2; Supplementary Methods

Incidence data

Figure S1: Characterisation of CAPAN1-B2S* Figure S2: Characterisation of SUM149-B1S* Figure S3: Sensitivity of ddPCR assay. Figure S4: Olaparib and talazoparib select for secondary mutant tumour cells. Figure S5: DLD1 tumour cells have a fitness advantage over DLD1.BRCA2-/- cells in vitro. Figure S6: Olaparib has little efficacy in mixed CAPAN-1 xenografts. Figure S7: Exome sequencing of CAPAN-1.B2.S* shows retention of TP53 mutations. Figure S8: Exome sequencing of SUM149.B1.S* show retention of TP53 mutation. Figure S9: BRCA-proficient and -deficient cells exhibit sensitivity to additional DNA damaging agents. Figure S10: AZD-1775 causes an active S phase reduction in both CAPAN1 and CAPAN-1.B2.S* cells.

The cell adhesion glycoprotein E-cadherin (CDH1) is commonly inactivated in breast tumors. Precision medicine approaches that exploit this characteristic are not available. Using perturbation screens in breast tumor cells with CRISPR/Cas9-engineered CDH1 mutations, we identified synthetic lethality between E-cadherin deficiency and inhibition of the tyrosine kinase ROS1. Data from large-scale genetic screens in molecularly diverse breast tumor cell lines established that the E-cadherin/ROS1 synthetic lethality was not only robust in the face of considerable molecular heterogeneity but was also elicited with clinical ROS1 inhibitors, including foretinib and crizotinib. ROS1 inhibitors induced mitotic abnormalities and multinucleation in E-cadherin–defective cells, phenotypes associated with a defect in cytokinesis and aberrant p120 catenin phosphorylation and localization. In vivo, ROS1 inhibitors produced profound antitumor effects in multiple models of E-cadherin–defective breast cancer. These data therefore provide the preclinical rationale for assessing ROS1 inhibitors, such as the licensed drug crizotinib, in appropriately stratified patients.Significance: E-cadherin defects are common in breast cancer but are currently not targeted with a precision medicine approach. Our preclinical data indicate that licensed ROS1 inhibitors, including crizotinib, should be repurposed to target E-cadherin–defective breast cancers, thus providing the rationale for the assessment of these agents in molecularly stratified phase II clinical trials. Cancer Discov; 8(4); 498–515. ©2018 AACR.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 371

Full list of reversions

Pathogenic neopeptide presentation scores

Supplementary Figures 1-8

Supplementary Tables

Reversion neopeptide presentation scores

cBioPortal studies used

ddPCR probe and primer design

Reversion mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are associated with resistance to PARP inhibitors and platinum. To better understand the nature of these mutations, we collated, codified, and analyzed more than 300 reversions. This identified reversion “hotspots” and “deserts” in regions encoding the N and C terminus, respectively, of BRCA2, suggesting that pathogenic mutations in these regions may be at higher or lower risk of reversion. Missense and splice-site pathogenic mutations in BRCA1/2 also appeared less likely to revert than truncating mutations. Most reversions were BRCA-mutant cancers.Significance:Reversion mutations in BRCA genes are a major cause of clinical platinum and PARP inhibitor resistance. This analysis of all reported clinical reversions suggests that the position of BRCA2 mutations affects the risk of reversion. Many reversions are also predicted to encode tumor neoantigens, providing a potential route to targeting resistance.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1426

Cases not explained by reversion

Supplementary Figure legends and methods

Studies included

Supplementary Figure from Identification of a Molecularly-Defined Subset of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Models that Respond to WEE1 or ATR Inhibition, Overcoming PARP Inhibitor Resistance

Supplementary Data from Identification of a Molecularly-Defined Subset of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Models that Respond to WEE1 or ATR Inhibition, Overcoming PARP Inhibitor Resistance

Purpose:PARP inhibitors (PARPi) induce synthetic lethality in homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient tumors and are used to treat breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers. Multiple PARPi resistance mechanisms exist, most resulting in restoration of HRR and protection of stalled replication forks. ATR inhibition was highlighted as a unique approach to reverse both aspects of resistance. Recently, however, a PARPi/WEE1 inhibitor (WEE1i) combination demonstrated enhanced antitumor activity associated with the induction of replication stress, suggesting another approach to tackling PARPi resistance.Experimental Design:We analyzed breast and ovarian patient-derived xenoimplant models resistant to PARPi to quantify WEE1i and ATR inhibitor (ATRi) responses as single agents and in combination with PARPi. Biomarker analysis was conducted at the genetic and protein level. Metabolite analysis by mass spectrometry and nucleoside rescue experiments ex vivo were also conducted in patient-derived models.Results:Although WEE1i response was linked to markers of replication stress, including STK11/RB1 and phospho-RPA, ATRi response associated with ATM mutation. When combined with olaparib, WEE1i could be differentiated from the ATRi/olaparib combination, providing distinct therapeutic strategies to overcome PARPi resistance by targeting the replication stress response. Mechanistically, WEE1i sensitivity was associated with shortage of the dNTP pool and a concomitant increase in replication stress.Conclusions:Targeting the replication stress response is a valid therapeutic option to overcome PARPi resistance including tumors without an underlying HRR deficiency. These preclinical insights are now being tested in several clinical trials where the PARPi is administered with either the WEE1i or the ATRi.

Supplementary Data from SMG8/SMG9 Heterodimer Loss Modulates SMG1 Kinase to Drive ATR Inhibitor Resistance

Gastric cancer represents the third leading cause of global cancer mortality and an area of unmet clinical need. Drugs that target the DNA damage response, including ATR inhibitors (ATRi), have been proposed as novel targeted agents in gastric cancer. Here, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of ATRi in preclinical models of gastric cancer and to understand how ATRi resistance might emerge as a means to identify predictors of ATRi response. A positive selection genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen identified candidate regulators of ATRi resistance in gastric cancer. Loss-of-function mutations in either SMG8 or SMG9 caused ATRi resistance by an SMG1-mediated mechanism. Although ATRi still impaired ATR/CHK1 signaling in SMG8/9-defective cells, other characteristic responses to ATRi exposure were not seen, such as changes in ATM/CHK2, γH2AX, phospho-RPA, or 53BP1 status or changes in the proportions of cells in S- or G2–M-phases of the cell cycle. Transcription/replication conflicts (TRC) elicited by ATRi exposure are a likely cause of ATRi sensitivity, and SMG8/9-defective cells exhibited a reduced level of ATRi-induced TRCs, which could contribute to ATRi resistance. These observations suggest ATRi elicits antitumor efficacy in gastric cancer but that drug resistance could emerge via alterations in the SMG8/9/1 pathway.Significance:These findings reveal how cancer cells acquire resistance to ATRi and identify pathways that could be targeted to enhance the overall effectiveness of these inhibitors.

This file contains the complete list of Dharmacon SMARTpool 384 well plate-arrayed siRNA libraries used in this paper. It is designed to target 714 kinases and kinase-related genes, 320 Wnt-pathway associated genes, 80 tumour suppressor genes, and 480 genes recurrently altered in human cancers.

This file lists the siRNAs that are significantly associated with VX-970 resistance in SYO1 SS tumour cells in which siRNA effects in VX970-exposed vs. DMSO-exposed cells were compared, quantifying resistance-causing effects as Drug Effect (DE) Z-scores. Genes are ranked according to DE Z-scores.

Supplementary Table from SMG8/SMG9 Heterodimer Loss Modulates SMG1 Kinase to Drive ATR Inhibitor Resistance

This file lists Z-score data of the synovial sarcoma (SS) specific hits from the siRNA screen. SS genetic dependencies were identified by comparing the siRNA Z-scores from the SS tumour cell line screens to siRNA Z-score profiles of >130 other tumour cell lines, and genes are ranked according to median difference between the SS tumour cell lines and other tumour cell lines.

Supplementary Figure from PBRM1 Deficiency Confers Synthetic Lethality to DNA Repair Inhibitors in Cancer

Supplementary Table from PBRM1 Deficiency Confers Synthetic Lethality to DNA Repair Inhibitors in Cancer

This file contains the list of the 79 small molecule inhibitors currently used or in the late stages of clinical development for cancer treatment, that were included in our drug screen.

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is an aggressive soft-tissue malignancy characterized by expression of SS18–SSX fusions, where treatment options are limited. To identify therapeutically actionable genetic dependencies in SS, we performed a series of parallel, high-throughput small interfering RNA (siRNA) screens and compared genetic dependencies in SS tumor cells with those in >130 non–SS tumor cell lines. This approach revealed a reliance of SS tumor cells upon the DNA damage response serine/threonine protein kinase ATR. Clinical ATR inhibitors (ATRi) elicited a synthetic lethal effect in SS tumor cells and impaired growth of SS patient-derived xenografts. Oncogenic SS18–SSX family fusion genes are known to alter the composition of the BAF chromatin–remodeling complex, causing ejection and degradation of wild-type SS18 and the tumor suppressor SMARCB1. Expression of oncogenic SS18–SSX fusion proteins caused profound ATRi sensitivity and a reduction in SS18 and SMARCB1 protein levels, but an SSX18–SSX1 Δ71–78 fusion containing a C-terminal deletion did not. ATRi sensitivity in SS was characterized by an increase in biomarkers of replication fork stress (increased γH2AX, decreased replication fork speed, and increased R-loops), an apoptotic response, and a dependence upon cyclin E expression. Combinations of cisplatin or PARP inhibitors enhanced the antitumor cell effect of ATRi, suggesting that either single-agent ATRi or combination therapy involving ATRi might be further assessed as candidate approaches for SS treatment. Cancer Res; 77(24); 7014–26. ©2017 AACR.

Supplementary data from PBRM1 Deficiency Confers Synthetic Lethality to DNA Repair Inhibitors in Cancer

Inactivation of Polybromo 1 (PBRM1), a specific subunit of the PBAF chromatin remodeling complex, occurs frequently in cancer, including 40% of clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC). To identify novel therapeutic approaches to targeting PBRM1-defective cancers, we used a series of orthogonal functional genomic screens that identified PARP and ATR inhibitors as being synthetic lethal with PBRM1 deficiency. The PBRM1/PARP inhibitor synthetic lethality was recapitulated using several clinical PARP inhibitors in a series of in vitro model systems and in vivo in a xenograft model of ccRCC. In the absence of exogenous DNA damage, PBRM1-defective cells exhibited elevated levels of replication stress, micronuclei, and R-loops. PARP inhibitor exposure exacerbated these phenotypes. Quantitative mass spectrometry revealed that multiple R-loop processing factors were downregulated in PBRM1-defective tumor cells. Exogenous expression of the R-loop resolution enzyme RNase H1 reversed the sensitivity of PBRM1-deficient cells to PARP inhibitors, suggesting that excessive levels of R-loops could be a cause of this synthetic lethality. PARP and ATR inhibitors also induced cyclic GMP-AMP synthase/stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS/STING) innate immune signaling in PBRM1-defective tumor cells. Overall, these findings provide the preclinical basis for using PARP inhibitors in PBRM1-defective cancers.Significance:This study demonstrates that PARP and ATR inhibitors are synthetic lethal with the loss of PBRM1, a PBAF-specific subunit, thus providing the rationale for assessing these inhibitors in patients with PBRM1-defective cancer.

This file contains the following supplementary data: Supplementary Figure 1. Detailed information on the effects of siATR and VX970 in SS tumour cell lines and additional tumour and non-tumour cell lines; Supplementary Figure 2. Effects of SS18-SSX fusion expression, and ARID1A or SMARCB1 knockdown on viability and VX970 sensitivity of non-SS cell lines; Supplementary Figure 3. Ability of SS tumour cells to elicit ATR signalling in response to either cisplatin or hydroxyurea, or ATM signalling in response to ionising radiation (IR), and SS tumour cell sensitivity to PARP inhibitors; Supplementary Figure 4. DNA fibre analysis illustrating replication fork speed in SYO-1 SS tumour cells upon VX970 exposure, and additional figures relating to the link between VX970 resistance and CCNE1; Supplementary Figure 5. Combination of VX970 to standard-of-care agents used in SS.

This file contains the details of all the primary and secondary antibodies used in this paper.

Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergy between PARP and PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2)–deficient and BRCA1/2-proficient tumors. We conducted an investigator-initiated phase I trial utilizing a prospective intrapatient dose- escalation design to assess two schedules of capivasertib (AKT inhibitor) with olaparib (PARP inhibitor) in 64 patients with advanced solid tumors. Dose expansions enrolled germline BRCA1/2-mutant tumors, or BRCA1/2 wild-type cancers harboring somatic DNA damage response (DDR) or PI3K–AKT pathway alterations. The combination was well tolerated. Recommended phase II doses for the two schedules were: olaparib 300 mg twice a day with either capivasertib 400 mg twice a day 4 days on, 3 days off, or capivasertib 640 mg twice a day 2 days on, 5 days off. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional. Pharmacodynamic studies confirmed phosphorylated (p) GSK3β suppression, increased pERK, and decreased BRCA1 expression. Twenty-five (44.6%) of 56 evaluable patients achieved clinical benefit (RECIST complete response/partial response or stable disease ≥ 4 months), including patients with tumors harboring germline BRCA1/2 mutations and BRCA1/2 wild-type cancers with or without DDR and PI3K–AKT pathway alterations. Significance: In the first trial to combine PARP and AKT inhibitors, a prospective intrapatient dose- escalation design demonstrated safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic activity and assessed predictive biomarkers of response/resistance. Antitumor activity was observed in patients harboring tumors with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and BRCA1/2 wild-type cancers with or without somatic DDR and/or PI3K–AKT pathway alterations. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1426

Reversion mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are associated with resistance to PARP inhibitors and platinum. To better understand the nature of these mutations, we collated, codified, and analyzed more than 300 reversions. This identified reversion “hotspots” and “deserts” in regions encoding the N and C terminus, respectively, of BRCA2, suggesting that pathogenic mutations in these regions may be at higher or lower risk of reversion. Missense and splice-site pathogenic mutations in BRCA1/2 also appeared less likely to revert than truncating mutations. Most reversions were Significance: Reversion mutations in BRCA genes are a major cause of clinical platinum and PARP inhibitor resistance. This analysis of all reported clinical reversions suggests that the position of BRCA2 mutations affects the risk of reversion. Many reversions are also predicted to encode tumor neoantigens, providing a potential route to targeting resistance. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1426

PURPOSE Preclinical studies demonstrated that ATR inhibition can exploit synthetic lethality (eg, in cancer cells with impaired compensatory DNA damage responses through ATM loss) as monotherapy and combined with DNA-damaging drugs such as carboplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase I trial assessed the ATR inhibitor M6620 (VX-970) as monotherapy (once or twice weekly) and combined with carboplatin (carboplatin on day 1 and M6620 on days 2 and 9 in 21-day cycles). Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose; secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity; exploratory objectives included pharmacodynamics in timed paired tumor biopsies. RESULTS Forty patients were enrolled; 17 received M6620 monotherapy, which was safe and well tolerated. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for once- or twice-weekly administration was 240 mg/m2. A patient with metastatic colorectal cancer harboring molecular aberrations, including ATM loss and an ARID1A mutation, achieved RECISTv1.1 complete response and maintained this response, with a progression-free survival of 29 months at last assessment. Twenty-three patients received M6620 with carboplatin, with mechanism-based hematologic toxicities at higher doses, requiring dose delays and reductions. The RP2D for combination therapy was M6620 90 mg/m2 with carboplatin AUC5. A patient with advanced germline BRCA1 ovarian cancer achieved RECISTv1.1 partial response and Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup CA125 response despite being platinum refractory and PARP inhibitor resistant. An additional 15 patients had RECISTv1.1 stable disease as best response. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional and exceeded preclinical efficacious levels. Pharmacodynamic studies demonstrated substantial inhibition of phosphorylation of CHK1, the downstream ATR substrate. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this report is the first of an ATR inhibitor as monotherapy and combined with carboplatin. M6620 was well tolerated, with target engagement and preliminary antitumor responses observed.

Cáncer de mama y de ovario; Inhibición WEE1 Càncer de mama i d'ovari; Inhibició WEE1 Breast and ovarian cancer; WEE1 inhibition Purpose: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) induce synthetic lethality in homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient tumors and are used to treat breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers. Multiple PARPi resistance mechanisms exist, most resulting in restoration of HRR and protection of stalled replication forks. ATR inhibition was highlighted as a unique approach to reverse both aspects of resistance. Recently, however, a PARPi/WEE1 inhibitor (WEE1i) combination demonstrated enhanced antitumor activity associated with the induction of replication stress, suggesting another approach to tackling PARPi resistance. Experimental Design: We analyzed breast and ovarian patient-derived xenoimplant models resistant to PARPi to quantify WEE1i and ATR inhibitor (ATRi) responses as single agents and in combination with PARPi. Biomarker analysis was conducted at the genetic and protein level. Metabolite analysis by mass spectrometry and nucleoside rescue experiments ex vivo were also conducted in patient-derived models. Results: Although WEE1i response was linked to markers of replication stress, including STK11/RB1 and phospho-RPA, ATRi response associated with ATM mutation. When combined with olaparib, WEE1i could be differentiated from the ATRi/olaparib combination, providing distinct therapeutic strategies to overcome PARPi resistance by targeting the replication stress response. Mechanistically, WEE1i sensitivity was associated with shortage of the dNTP pool and a concomitant increase in replication stress. Conclusions: Targeting the replication stress response is a valid therapeutic option to overcome PARPi resistance including tumors without an underlying HRR deficiency. These preclinical insights are now being tested in several clinical trials where the PARPi is administered with either the WEE1i or the ATRi. This work was supported by the Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), an initiative of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Innovation partially supported by European Regional Development FEDER Funds (FIS PI17/01080 to V. Serra, PI12/02606 to J. Balmaña); European Research Area-NET, Transcan-2 (AC15/00063), Asociación Española contra el Cáncer (AECC; LABAE16020PORTT), the Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR; 2017 SGR 540), La Marató TV3 (654/C/2019), and ERAPERMED2019–215 to V. Serra. We also acknowledge the GHD-Pink program, the FERO Foundation, and the Orozco Family for supporting this study (to V. Serra). V. Serra was supported by the Miguel Servet Program (ISCIII; CPII19/00033); M. Castroviejo-Bermejo and C. Cruz (AIOC15152806CRUZ) by AECC; A. Herencia-Ropero by Generalitat de Catalunya-PERIS (SLT017/20/000081); M. Palafox by Juan de la Cierva (FJCI-2015–25412); A. Lau by AECC and Generalitat de Catalunya-PERIS (INVES20095LLOP, SLT002/16/00477); A. Gris-Oliver by FI-AGAUR (2015 FI_B 01075). This work was supported by Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF-19–08), Instituto de Salud Carlos III Project Reference number AC15/00062, and the EC under the framework of the ERA-NET TRANSCAN-2 initiative co-financed by FEDER, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CB16/12/00449 and PI19/01181), and Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (to J. Arribas). The xenograft program in the Caldas laboratory was supported by Cancer Research UK and also received funding from an EU H2020 Network of Excellence (EuroCAN). The RPPA facility is funded by NCI #CA16672.

Background: Assessing how clinical resistance to PARP inhibitors develops has been challenging, due to the lack of coverage of potential resistance genes in sequencing panels and biopsies being subject to spatial heterogeneity. We studied the development of PARPi and/or platinum resistant disease using both tissue and a novel liquid biopsy assay, in patients treated for BRCA1/2-mutated metastatic breast cancer (BRCA1/2m mBC). Approach: A cohort of 35 mBC patients with germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations were identified as having developed PARPi or platinum resistant disease. Tumour biopsies were analysed by exome and transcriptome sequencing whereas ctDNA isolated from plasma sampled across the pre-treatment, response and eventual progression journey were analysed using the Guardant INFINITY platform equipped to detect mutations in >800 genes, and genome wide methylation, including promoter methylation in 398 cancer-related genes. Somatic mutations or regions of methylation that were associated with resistance were identified, including BRCA1/2 reversion mutations. Somatic mutations with the potential to cause PARPi resistance were annotated using CRISPR screen data and other functional analyses describing genes that alter PARPi synthetic lethality. Results: The most common resistance mechanism was BRCA1/2 reversion mutation (51%; n=8 BRCA1m patients, n=10 BRCA2m patients). Most reversions (77%) occurred via deletions (BRCA1, 70%; BRCA2, 79%) and exhibited microhomology use at junctions (> 80% for both BRCA1 and BRCA2). In 14 patients, multiple concurrent reversion mutations were detected with VAFs ranging from 0.1-40% for BRCA1 and 0.05-18% for BRCA2. Changes in VAF over time indicated that different reversions in the same patient may impart different fitness advantages in the face of treatment. Loss-of-function mutations in the 53BP1-Shieldin pathway were identified in two BRCA1m patients, and VUS mutations in the pathway were seen in two further patients. In some patients, reversion mutations co-occurred with either 53BP1-Shieldin pathway mutations or with replication fork stability mutations (PAXIP1 in BRCA2m patients) - indicating concurrent but mechanistically distinct forms of resistance develop in the same patient. We isolated a PDX model from one patient that exhibits resistance via both BRCA1 reversion and loss of 53BP1, allowing this phenomenon to be modelled in more detail. We also detected BRCA1 methylation in ctDNA in a patient with a somatic rearrangement in BRCA1. Conclusions: Liquid biopsy profiling of PARPi-resistance breast cancer patients indicates that many patients develop multiple reversion mutations, and that alterations in the 53BP1-Shieldin pathway are present but less frequent. The co-occurrence of 53BP1-Shieldin pathway mutations and reversion mutations suggests parallel mechanisms of resistance can operate in the same patient. Citation Format: Elizabeth Harvey-Jones, Maya Raghunandan, Luisa Robbez-Masson, Alaguthurai Thanussuyah, Roberta Liccardo, Arielle Yablonovitch, Mingyang Cai, Leylah Drusbosky, Michael Dorschner, Lorena Magraner Pardo, Rebecca Marlow, Asha Konde, Jennifer Trendell, John Alexander, Syed Haider, Chris Starling, Ioannis Roxanis, Jennifer Yen, Stephen J. Pettitt, Christopher J. Lord, Andrew N. Tutt. Longitudinal analysis of PARP inhibitor and platinum resistance in BRCA1/2m breast cancer using liquid biopsy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6094.

Gastric cancer represents the third leading cause of global cancer mortality and an area of unmet clinical need. Drugs that target the DNA damage response, including ATR inhibitors (ATRi), have been proposed as novel targeted agents in gastric cancer. Here, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of ATRi in preclinical models of gastric cancer and to understand how ATRi resistance might emerge as a means to identify predictors of ATRi response. A positive selection genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen identified candidate regulators of ATRi resistance in gastric cancer. Loss-of-function mutations in either SMG8 or SMG9 caused ATRi resistance by an SMG1-mediated mechanism. Although ATRi still impaired ATR/CHK1 signaling in SMG8/9-defective cells, other characteristic responses to ATRi exposure were not seen, such as changes in ATM/CHK2, γH2AX, phospho-RPA, or 53BP1 status or changes in the proportions of cells in S- or G2–M-phases of the cell cycle. Transcription/replication conflicts (TRC) elicited by ATRi exposure are a likely cause of ATRi sensitivity, and SMG8/9-defective cells exhibited a reduced level of ATRi-induced TRCs, which could contribute to ATRi resistance. These observations suggest ATRi elicits antitumor efficacy in gastric cancer but that drug resistance could emerge via alterations in the SMG8/9/1 pathway. Significance: These findings reveal how cancer cells acquire resistance to ATRi and identify pathways that could be targeted to enhance the overall effectiveness of these inhibitors.