Search

OBJECTIVES Although surgery is considered the standard of care for early-stage lung cancer, there has been increased use of stereotactic radiotherapy for operable patients in recent years. Given that this modality may be perceived as a more practical treatment, we hypothesized that it might be more often delivered to patients who experience barriers to care. METHODS The National Cancer Database (2018–2020) was queried for patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer treated with surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy (48–60 Gy, 3–5 fractions), excluding patients with contraindications to surgery. Patients who had all the following characteristics were categorized as experiencing 'high barriers' to treatment: income below median national levels, lack of private insurance, treatment at a community facility and residence in non-metropolitan areas. Using multivariable logistic regression, the association between high barriers to treatment and stereotactic radiotherapy use was estimated. RESULTS A total of 60 829 patients were included, of whom 3382 (5.6%) experienced high barriers to treatment. Among them, 13 535 (22.3%) underwent stereotactic radiotherapy and 47 294 (77.7%) underwent surgery. Overall, more patients undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy faced high barriers to treatment compared to those who received surgery (8.6% vs 4.7%, P  < 0.001). Geographic region was associated with the delivery of stereotactic radiotherapy (P  < 0.001). The magnitude of such association was stronger among those who faced high barriers. In multivariable analysis, experiencing high barriers to treatment remained associated with receiving stereotactic radiotherapy (OR: 1.46, 95% CI 1.35–1.58). CONCLUSIONS The use of stereotactic radiotherapy is more prevalent among patients facing barriers to care. Further research is needed to clarify the role of this treatment modality in early-stage lung cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment for dural recurrence of olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is not standardized. We assess the outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in this population. Methods: ONB patients with dural recurrences treated between 2013 and 2022 on a prospective registry were included. Tumor control, survival, and patient‐reported quality of life were analyzed. Results: Fourteen patients with 32 dural lesions were evaluated. Time to dural recurrence was 58.3 months. Thirty lesions (94%) were treated with SBRT to a median dose of 27 Gy in three fractions. Two patients (3 of 32 lesions; 9%) developed in‐field radiographic progression, five patients (38%) experienced progression in non‐contiguous dura. Two‐year local control was 85% (95% CI: 51–96%). There were no >grade 3 acute toxicities and 1 case of late grade 3 brain radionecrosis. Conclusion: In this largest study of SBRT reirradiation for ONB dural recurrence to date, high local control rates with minimal toxicity were attainable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The hypofractionated radiotherapy of cancer involves the application of a reduced number of larger doses per fraction than used in typical conventional radiation treatments. Tumors can also be treated with hyperthermia (heating at 40–45 °C), and although such heat treatments alone have no relevance as a cancer therapy, pre-clinical and clinical studies indicate that hyperthermia can enhance the effect of hypofractionated radiation. However, additional pre-clinical and large-scale clinical studies are needed to optimize and establish standard treatment protocols, as well as demonstrate the efficacy and safety of this combination. This review addresses some of these issues. The conventional radiation treatment of cancer patients has typically involved a large number of daily treatments with relatively low doses of radiation. However, improved technology has now resulted in the increased use of fewer radiation fractions at a high dose per fraction. This latter approach is often referred to as hypofractionated irradiation. While conventional radiation typically kills tumor cells through the production of DNA damage, treatments with higher doses per fraction have been suggested to also kill cells via the induction of vascular damage. Such vascular effects will also increase the level of adverse microenvironmental conditions, such as hypoxia and acidity, that already exist in tumors. Cells existing in these adverse microenvironmental conditions are resistant to radiation but actually sensitive to hyperthermia (heating at 40–45 °C) treatment. This suggests that the combination of hypofractionated radiation and heat may be a viable treatment approach. While there are preliminary pre-clinical and even clinical studies investigating this option, there are actually no data on the optimal application for the greatest therapeutic benefit. In this critical review, we will present the rationale for combining hypofractionated radiation with hyperthermia and discuss what has been done and what should be done to establish this combination as an effective cancer therapy option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To conduct an international survey of radiation oncologists treating primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with SABR to ascertain the general patterns of SABR use, common dose/treatment/follow-up details, and expected outcomes. Materials and methods: A 51-question survey was created containing the following themes: prevalence and clinical scenarios in which RCC SABR is used, dose-fractionation schedules, treatment delivery details, follow-up/outcome assessments, and implementation barriers. The survey was distributed widely across multiple influential radiation oncology societies and social media, and ran from January to April 2023. Results: A total of 255 respondents participated, mostly from academic centers within Europe/North America. Of these, 40 % (n = 102) currently offer SABR (50 % having begun within the last 3 years). Common barriers in non-users included lack of referrals by urologists and lack of supportive practice guidelines. Of respondents who do offer SABR, 77 % treat both small (4 cm or less) and large (>4 cm) renal masses. Dose-fractionation strategies varied from 27-52 Gy (3–5 fractions) for multifraction regimens, and 15–34 Gy for single fractions. Apart from treatment for medically inoperable disease, scenarios in which SABR was likely to be offered were for recurrence post surgery/thermal ablation and for oligometastatic kidney lesions. Uncommon scenarios included RCC with renal vein/inferior vena cava thrombosis, and as cytoreductive therapy in metastatic RCC. Expected local control outcomes were generally above 70 %, higher for small versus large renal masses. Conclusions: SABR is a relatively newer indication for primary RCC, offered by less than 50% of respondents, with both consistent and variable practice patterns observed.

Background: Recurrent high-grade gliomas present a therapeutic challenge. Repeat surgery, re-irradiation, and systemic therapy have been explored, with re-irradiation requiring precise tumor relapse delineation and advanced dosimetric techniques. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of re-irradiation using Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation (HFSRT) schedules. Materials and methods: In a retrospective analysis from 2011 to 2021, 52 adult patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas were examined, including 42.3% with glioblastoma, 32.5% with grade 3 gliomas, and 25% with grade 2 gliomas as initial diagnosis. All received prior radiotherapy at doses ranging from 54-60 Gy, with a median time to tumor relapse of 19.8 months. Salvage surgery was performed in 42.3% of cases, with a median interval of 22.45 months between radiation courses. Re-irradiation doses were 30 Gy in 5 fractions for 54% and 40 Gy in 10 fractions for 46%. Concurrent systemic treatments included temozolomide (30.8%), nevacizumab (27%), or none (35%). Results: In-field and out-field tumor progression occurred in 65.4% and 25% of patients, with median times to local and distant progression of 5.17 and 4.57 months. Median overall survival (OS) from re-irradiation was 12 months. Univariate analysis showed a trend favoring 30 Gy in 5 fractions for disease progression-free survival (DPFS). Treatment was generally well-tolerated, with only 5.7% experiencing acute Grade-3 toxicity, and symptomatic radionecrosis occurred in 2 patients. Conclusion: Re-irradiation using HFSRT for recurrent high-grade gliomas is viable and well-tolerated, demonstrating survival rates comparable to existing literature. These findings underscore the potential of HFSRT in managing recurrent high-grade gliomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Frameless image-guided radiosurgery (IGRS) is an effective and non-invasive method of treating patients who are unresponsive to medical management for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). This study evaluated the use of frameless IGRS to treat patients with medically refractory TN. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of records of 116 patients diagnosed with TN who underwent frameless IGRS using a linear accelerator (LINAC) over 10 years (March 2012-February 2023). All patients had failed medical management for TN. Facial pain was graded using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scoring system. Each patient received a BNI score before frameless IGRS and following treatment. Failure was defined as a BNI score IV-V at the last follow-up and/or undergoing a salvage procedure following IGRS. Results: All patients had a BNI score of either IV or V before the frameless IGRS. The mean follow-up duration for all 116 patients following IGRS was 44.1 months. Most patients (81 [69.8%]) had not undergone surgery (microvascular decompression [MVD] or rhizotomy) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for TN before frameless IGRS. A total of 41 (35.3%) patients underwent a salvage procedure (MVD, rhizotomy, or an additional IGRS) following frameless IGRS. The mean duration between the initial frameless IGRS and salvage procedure was 20.1 months. At the last follow-up, a total of 110 (94.8%) patients had a BNI score of I-III. No complications were reported after the frameless IGRS. The BNI score at the last follow-up was lower compared to the initial BNI for patients regardless of prior intervention (P < 0.001). Patients who failed IGRS had a higher BNI score at the last follow-up compared to those who did not fail IGRS (2.8 vs. 2.5, P = 0.05). Patients with pain relief had a shorter follow-up compared to those with pain refractory to SRS (38.0 vs. 55.1, P = 0.005). Conclusion: In this large cohort of patients with medically refractory TN, frameless IGRS resulted in durable pain control in the majority of patients without any toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is primarily treated with combination chemotherapy, while whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) can be used as consolidative treatment or as a salvage option for central nervous system (CNS) relapse. We investigated whether fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) could replace WBRT in cases where patients had poor performance status or minimal disease at the time of consolidation, to spare patients the adverse effects of WBRT. We retrospectively identified 10 patients who completed 14 courses of fSRS for PCNSL or for CNS relapse of systemic lymphoma. Of 14 fSRS treatments, there were 10 distant brain recurrences among 6 patients, occurring on average 13.6 months after fSRS. A total of 4 of the 10 recurrences were treated with further fSRS, and 4 were treated with WBRT. There was one late in-field recurrence after both fSRS and WBRT, which occurred 27 months after fSRS. The median survival after fSRS was 36 months, and side effects after fSRS were minimal. This case series represents a potential treatment option for patients with CNS lymphoma, for whom WBRT is indicated but where the toxic effects of this treatment would be prohibitive.

Introduction: Radiotherapy is one of the standard treatments for brain metastases (BM). Over the past years, the introduction of immunotherapy as routine treatment for solid tumors has forced investigators to review and evaluate how it would interact with radiation. Radiation and Immunotherapy have shown a synergic effect activating the host's immune system and enhancing treatment response. The combinatory effect on BM is currently under investigation. Methods: Data published on Pubmed to determine toxicity, survival, treatment characteristics and timing on the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of BM has been reviewed. Results: Mostly retrospective reviews report an improvement of intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) when combining radioimmunotherapy for BM patients. Two systematic reviews and meta-analysis and one phase II prospective trial also report a benefit on iPFS without an increase of toxicity. Among the published literature, the definition of concurrency is heterogeneous, being one month or even narrowed intervals correlated to better clinical outcomes. Toxicity due to concurrent radioimmunotherapy, specifically symptomatic radionecrosis, is also directly analyzed and reported to be low, similar to the toxicity rates secondary to stereotactic radiosurgery alone. Conclusion: Radiation combined with immunotherapy has shown in predominantly retrospective reviews a synergic effect on the treatment of BM. The concurrent combination of radioimmunotherapy is a feasible therapeutic strategy and seems to improve clinical outcomes, especially iPFS, when delivered within <30 days. Larger prospective and randomized studies are needed to establish reliable outcomes, best delivery strategies and toxicity profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiation to the carotid arteries, e.g. in the context of head and neck cancer treatment, is one of several risk factors for artery stenosis. In principle, this fact may also have implications for stereotactic cervical spine radiotherapy, because long-term survival can be achieved in patients with oligometastatic disease and favorable prognostic features. Here, we suggest that radiation dose distributions with reduced dose to the carotid artery are achievable when planning stereotactic cervical spine radiotherapy. Patients with high likelihood of long-term survival may benefit from such vessel-sparing approaches.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is primarily treated with combination chemotherapy, while whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) can be used as consolidative treatment or as a salvage option for central nervous system (CNS) relapse. We investigated whether fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) could replace WBRT in cases where patients had poor performance status or minimal disease at the time of consolidation, to spare patients the adverse effects of WBRT. We retrospectively identified 10 patients who completed 14 courses of fSRS for PCNSL or for CNS relapse of systemic lymphoma. Of 14 fSRS treatments, there were 10 distant brain recurrences among 6 patients, occurring on average 13.6 months after fSRS. A total of 4 of the 10 recurrences were treated with further fSRS, and 4 were treated with WBRT. There was one late in-field recurrence after both fSRS and WBRT, which occurred 27 months after fSRS. The median survival after fSRS was 36 months, and side effects after fSRS were minimal. This case series represents a potential treatment option for patients with CNS lymphoma, for whom WBRT is indicated but where the toxic effects of this treatment would be prohibitive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hemoptysis is a complication of intrathoracic tumors, both primary and metastatic, and the risk may be increased by procedural interventions as well as Stereotactic Ablative Radiation (SAbR). The risk of hemoptysis with SAbR for lung cancer is well characterized, but there is a paucity of data about intrathoracic metastases. Here, we sought to evaluate the incidence of life-threatening/fatal hemoptysis (LTH) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) chest metastases with a focus on SAbR. We systematically evaluated patients with RCC at UT Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW) Kidney Cancer Program (KCP) from July 2005 to March 2020. We queried Kidney Cancer Explorer (KCE), a data portal with clinical, pathological, and experimental genomic data. Patients were included in the study based on mention of "hemoptysis" in clinical documentation, if they had a previous bronchoscopy, or had undergone SAbR to any site within the chest. Two hundred and thirty four patients met query cr iter ia and their records were individually reviewed. We identified 10 patients who developed LTH. Of these, 4 had LTH as an immediate procedural complication whilst the remaining 6 had prior SAbR to ultra-central (UC; abutting the central bronchial tree) metastases. These 6 patients had a total of 10 lung lesions irradiated (UC, 8; central 1, peripheral 1), with a median total cumulative SAbR dose of 38 Gray (Gy/ lesion) (range: 25-50 Gy). Other risk factors included intrathoracic disease progression (n = 4, 67%), concurrent anticoagulant therapy (n = 1, 17%) and concurrent systemic therapy (n = 4, 67%). Median time to LTH from first SAbR was 26 months (range: 8-61 months). Considering that 130 patients received SAbR to a chest lesion during the study period, the overall incidence of LTH following SAbR was 4.6% (6/130). The patient population that received SAbR (n = 130) was at particularly high risk for complications, with 67 (52%) having two or more chest metastaes treated, and 29 (22%) receiving SAbR to three or more lesions. Overall, the risk of LTH following SAbR to a central or UC lesion was 10.5% (6/57). In conclusion, SAbR of RCC metastases located near the central bronchial tree may increase the risk of LTH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionRadiotherapy is one of the standard treatments for brain metastases (BM). Over the past years, the introduction of immunotherapy as routine treatment for solid tumors has forced investigators to review and evaluate how it would interact with radiation. Radiation and Immunotherapy have shown a synergic effect activating the host’s immune system and enhancing treatment response. The combinatory effect on BM is currently under investigation.MethodsData published on Pubmed to determine toxicity, survival, treatment characteristics and timing on the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of BM has been reviewed.ResultsMostly retrospective reviews report an improvement of intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) when combining radioimmunotherapy for BM patients. Two systematic reviews and meta-analysis and one phase II prospective trial also report a benefit on iPFS without an increase of toxicity. Among the published literature, the definition of concurrency is heterogeneous, being one month or even narrowed intervals correlated to better clinical outcomes. Toxicity due to concurrent radioimmunotherapy, specifically symptomatic radionecrosis, is also directly analyzed and reported to be low, similar to the toxicity rates secondary to stereotactic radiosurgery alone.ConclusionRadiation combined with immunotherapy has shown in predominantly retrospective reviews a synergic effect on the treatment of BM. The concurrent combination of radioimmunotherapy is a feasible therapeutic strategy and seems to improve clinical outcomes, especially iPFS, when delivered within

Abstract Background Radiobiological daily changes within tumors are considered to be quite different between stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) (e.g., 50 Gy in 4 fractions) and conventional radiotherapy (e.g., 60 Gy in 30 fractions). We aim to assess the optimal interval of irradiation in SRT and compare outcomes of daily irradiation with irradiation at two- to three-day intervals in SRT for patients with one to five brain metastases (BM). Methods This study is conducted as a multicenter open-label randomized phase II trial. Patients aged 20 or older with one to five BM, less than 3.0 cm diameter, and Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70 are eligible. A total of 70 eligible patients will be enrolled. After stratifying by the number of BMs (1, 2 vs. 3–5) and diameter of the largest tumor (

IntroductionSince radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates repeated biopsies. Focal stereotactic body radiation therapy (focal SBRT) may be an alternative. This non-randomized Phase-II trial examined the feasibility and safety of focal SBRT for low and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer.MethodsPatients were recruited in 2016–2019 if they had: localized CAPRA ≤ 3 prostate adenocarcinoma; an isolated PIRADS≥4 macroscopic tumor on MRI; WHO Performance Status 0-1; and no major urinary symptoms. 36.25 Gy (80% isodose prescription) were delivered in 5 fractions every other day. Primary outcome was delay between focal SBRT and salvage-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were: acute/late genitourinary/rectal toxicity; biological, clinical and MRI local control; and change in QOL measures.ResultsOver a median follow-up of 36 months, salvage prostatectomy in the 24 eligible patients was never required. Three-year biochemical progression-free survival was 96%. The single biochemical recurrence was a small (2-mm) Gleason 6 (3 + 3) lesion in the non-irradiated lobe. All 19 patients with ≥1 post-treatment MRI evaluations demonstrated complete radiological response. Acute/late grade ≥3 toxicities did not occur: all acute toxicities were grade-1 genitourinary (38% patients), grade-2 genitourinary (8%), or grade-1 rectal (13%) toxicities. There was one (4%) late grade-1 genitourinary toxicity. QOL was unchanged at last follow-up, as shown by IPSS (2.86 to 3.29, p>0.05), U-QOL (0.71 to 0.67, p>0.05), and IIEF5 (the 14 initially potent patients maintained potency (IIEF5 > 16)).ConclusionFocal SBRT is feasible, well-tolerated, and preserves QOL. This innovative robotized approach challenges active surveillance.

It was suggested that stereotactic radiation (SBRT) is an "alternative if no surgical capacity is available" for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to compare the oncologic outcomes of delayed surgical resection and early SBRT among operable patients with early stage lung cancer. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with cT1aN0M0 NSCLC who underwent surgery or SBRT (2010-2016) with no comorbidity. Patients with any comorbidities or age >80 were excluded. The outcome of interest was overall survival. Delays in surgical care were modeled using different times from diagnosis to surgery. A 1:1 propensity match was performed and survival was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression. Of 6720 healthy cT1aN0M0 NSCLC patients, 6008 (89.4%) received surgery and 712 (10.6%) received SBRT. Among surgery patients, time to surgery >30 d was associated with inferior survival (HR > 1.4, P ≤ 0.013) compared with patients receiving surgery ≤14 d. Relative to SBRT, surgery demonstrated superior survival at all time points evaluated: 0-30 d, 31-60 d, 61-90 d, and >90 d (all P < 0.001). Among a propensity-matched cohort of 256 pairs of patients, delayed surgery (>90 d) remained association with better overall survival relative to early SBRT (5-year survival 76.9% versus 32.3%, HR = 0.266, P < 0.001). Although longer time to surgery is associated with inferior survival among surgery patients, delayed surgery is superior to early SBRT. Surgical resection should remain the standard of care to treat operable early stage lung cancer despite delays imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundManagement of a recurrent vertebral metastasis in a situation of previously irradiated spinal cord is a challenging clinical dilemma.Case presentationWe report a first case of second retreatment of a spinal metastasis initially irradiated with standard radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), who subsequently progressed with imaging-confirmed local tumor progression at the same level. After a third course of irradiation with SBRT, a complete response was achieved. After 8 months of follow-up, the patients remain free of local recurrence.ConclusionA third course of vertebral irradiation for a recurrent vertebral metastasis failing to two previous irradiations, in this particular case, have shown the feasibility and efficacy of the technique as a salvage treatment option. This approach could be used in a selected group of patient if an adequate dose is delivered to the target while observing critical tissue tolerance limits.

Background: Radiobiological daily changes within tumors are considered to be quite different between stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) (e.g., 50 Gy in 4 fractions) and conventional radiotherapy (e.g., 60 Gy in 30 fractions). We aim to assess the optimal interval of irradiation in SRT and compare outcomes of daily irradiation with irradiation at two- to three-day intervals in SRT for patients with one to five brain metastases (BM).Methods: This study is conducted as a multicenter open-label randomized phase II trial. Patients aged 20 or older with one to five BM, less than 3.0 cm diameter, and Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70 are eligible. A total of 70 eligible patients will be enrolled. After stratifying by the number of BMs (1, 2 vs. 3-5) and diameter of the largest tumor (< 2 cm vs. ≥ 2 cm), we randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive daily irradiation (Arm 1), or irradiation at two- to three-day intervals (Arm 2). Both arms are performed with total dose of 27-30 Gy in 3 fractions. The primary endpoint is an intracranial local control rate, defined as intracranial local control at initially treated sites. We use a randomized phase II screening design with a two-sided α of 0∙20. The phase II trial is positive with p < 0.20. All analyses are intention to treat. This study is registered with the UMIN-clinical trials registry, number UMIN000048728.Discussion: This study will provide an assessment of the impact of SRT interval on local control, survival, and toxicity for patients with 1-5 BM. The trial is ongoing and is recruiting now.Trial Registration: UMIN000048728. Date of registration: August 23, 2022. https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000055515 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• There has been a surge in publications of SABR in oligoprogressive tumours. • Majority of publication are retrospective. • Prostate and Renal primaries were associated with promising 1 y PFS. • Universal definitions are recommended to ensure consistency in reporting and comparability of future studies. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to review evidence and pool outcomes to assess the effectiveness of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients treated for oligoprogressive metastases. A search was conducted January 2010 to January 2023 in five bibliographic databases for studies of patients with oligoprogressive disease treated with SABR to all lesions. Clinical outcomes included PFS (progression-free survival), OS (overall survival) and CST (change in systemic therapy). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Binary random effects model was used for pooled analyses. 12,366 titles/abstracts screened, of which 25 met eligibility criteria and were included the review. All studies were published after 2017 with approximately 80% of the publications in 2021 and 2022. The primary tumour was prostate (n=8, 32%), kidney (n=6, 24%), colorectal (n=4, 16%) followed by breast (n=3, 12%), lung (n=2, 8%) and mixed (n=3, 12%). At 1 year, the pooled PFS was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34–53%, I2=91%); 53% (95% CI: 45–60%, I2=46%) in prostate, 49% (95% CI: 33–65%, I2=88%) in kidney, 62% (95% CI: 11–113%, I2=96%) in lung, 13% (95% CI: 3–24%, I2=39%) in breast and 30% (95% CI: 19–41%, I2=59%) in mixed. There has been a surge in publications describing the use of SABR in oligoprogressive tumours. Published studies are mostly retrospective reported in prostate and kidney cancers, with limited evidence in other sites. Universal guidelines are recommended to ensure consistency in reporting and comparability of future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Data on the outcomes of microsurgical resection (SR) and stereotactic gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in patients with trigeminal neuralgia associated with small petrous apex meningiomas are scarce.Objective: We conducted this study to evaluate the pain relief, tumor control, and procedure costs following SR and GKRS for small petroclival meningiomas (less than 3 cm in maximal diameter) using real-world data from our center in Egypt.Material and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 47 patients with small petrous apex meningiomas presenting with intractable trigeminal nerve pain (SR: n = 22 and GKRS: n = 25). Data regarding pain relief on Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI), procedure cost, and tumor control were retrieved and analyzed using appropriate statistical tests.Results: Patients who underwent SR had lower median BNI pain intensity scores compared to those patients who underwent GKRS, and a significantly higher proportion of patients in the SR group had good BNI scores compared to those in GKRS group (P < 0.05); however, the total costs of SR were significantly less than GKRS (30,519$ vs. 92,372$, respectively).Conclusion: Both SR and GKRS provide pain relief and tumor control in patients with trigeminal neuralgia associated with petrous apex meningioma. However, in the present study, SR achieved better pain control and was more affordable than GKRS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chondrosarcoma is an uncommon primary bone tumor with an estimated incidence of 0.5 per 100,000 patient-years. Primary chondrosarcoma of the mobile spine and sacrum cumulatively account for less than 20% of all cases, most .commonly causing patients to present with focal pain with or without radiculopathy, or myelopathy secondary to neural element compression. Because of the rarity, patients benefit from multidisciplinary care at academic tertiary-care centers. Current standard-of-care consists of en bloc surgical resection with negative margins; for high grade lesions adjuvant focused radiation with ≥60 gray equivalents is taking an increased role in improving local control. Prognosis is dictated by lesion grade at the time of resection. Several groups have put forth survival calculators and epidemiological evidence suggests prognosis is quite good for lesions receiving R0 resection. Future efforts will be focused on identifying potential chemotherapeutic adjuvants and refining radiation treatments as a means of improving local control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Brain metastases (BM) usually represent a poor prognostic factor in solid tumors. About 10% of patients with renal cancer (RCC) will present BM. Local therapies such as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and surgery are used to achieve brain control. We compared survival between patients with synchronous BM (SynBM group) and metachronous BM (MetaBM group). Methods: It is a retrospective study of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and BM treated with TKI between 2005 and 2019 at the Centre Léon Bérard in Lyon. We collected prognostic factors: The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, the TNM stage, the histological subtypes and the Fuhrman grade. Overall survival (OS) was defined from diagnosis of metastatic ccRCC to death. Brain progression-free survival (B-PFS) was defined from focal brain therapy to brain progression or death. Results: 99 patients were analyzed, 44 in the SynBM group and 55 in the MetaBM group. OS in the MetaBM group was 49.4 months versus 19.6 months in the SynBM group, p = 0.0002. The median time from diagnosis of metastasic disease to apparition of BM in the MetaBM group was 22.9 months (4.3; 125.7). SRT was used for 101 lesions (66.4%), WBRT for 25 patients (16.4%), surgery for 21 lesions (13.8%), surgery followed by radiation for 5 lesions (3.3%). B-PFS for all patients was 7 months (IC95% [5.0–10.5]). Conclusions: Survival of patients with synchronous BM is inferior to that of patients with metachronous BM. Outcome is poor in both cases after diagnosis of BM. Brain screening should be encouraged at time of diagnosis of metastatis in ccRCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chordoma is a notochord-derived primary tumor of the skull base and vertebral column known to affect 0.08 to 0.5 per 100,000 persons worldwide. Patients commonly present with mechanical, midline pain with or without radicular features secondary to nerve root compression. Management of these lesions has classically revolved around oncologic resection, defined by en bloc resection of the lesion with negative margins as this was found to significantly improve both local control and overall survival. With advancement in radiation modalities, namely the increased availability of focused photon therapy and proton beam radiation, high-dose (>50 Gy) neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy is also becoming a standard of care. At present chemotherapy does not appear to have a role, but ongoing investigations into the ontogeny and molecular pathophysiology of chordoma promise to identify therapeutic targets that may further alter this paradigm. In this narrative review we describe the epidemiology, histopathology, diagnosis, and treatment of chordoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brain metastases can effectively be treated with surgical resection and adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has been used to non-invasively map the motor cortex prior to surgery of motor eloquent brain lesions. To date, few studies have reported the integration of such motor maps into radiotherapy planning. The hippocampus has been identified as an additional critical structure of radiation-induced deficits. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of selective dose reduction to both the nTMS-based motor cortex and the hippocampi in SRT of motor-eloquent brain metastases. Patients with motor-eloquent brain metastases undergoing surgical resection and adjuvant SRT between 07/2014 and 12/2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The radiotherapy treatment plans were retrieved from the treatment planning system ("original" plan). For each case, two intensity-modulated treatment plans were created: the "motor" plan aimed to reduce the dose to the motor cortex, the "motor & hipp" plan additionally reduce the dose to the hippocampus. The optimized plans were compared with the "original" plan regarding plan quality, planning target volume (PTV) coverage, and sparing of organs at risk (OAR). 69 plans were analyzed, all of which were clinically acceptable with no significant differences for PTV coverage. All OAR were protected according to standard protocols. Sparing of the nTMS motor map was feasible: mean dose 9.66 ± 5.97 Gy (original) to 6.32 ± 3.60 Gy (motor) and 6.49 ± 3.78 Gy (motor & hipp), p<0.001. In the "motor & hipp" plan, dose to the ipsilateral hippocampi could be significantly reduced (max 1.78 ± 1.44 Gy vs 2.49 ± 1.87 Gy in "original", p = 0.003; mean 1.01 ± 0.92 Gy vs. 1.32 ± 1.07 Gy in "original", p = 0.007). The study confirms the results from previous studies that inclusion of nTMS motor information into radiotherapy treatment planning is possible with a relatively straightforward workflow and can achieve reduced doses to the nTMS-defined motor area without compromising PTV coverage. Furthermore, we demonstrate the feasibility of selective dose reduction to the hippocampus at the same time. The clinical significance of these optimized plans yet remains to be determined. However, with no apparent disadvantages these optimized plans call for further and broader exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: The management of metastatic disease is evolving. As systemic therapies continue to improve, there is increasing recognition that local therapy to distant sites of disease impacts outcomes among many histologies, including sarcoma. Various local therapy strategies exist, but radiation therapy (RT) is particularly critical as it provides a non-invasive, yet locally ablative strategy for metastatic management. Recent Findings: Various delivery techniques including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or hypofractionated RT can escalate the biologic dose while avoiding normal tissues in order to reduce tumor burden, provide durable local control, palliate symptoms, potentially prevent further seeding of metastatic lesions, and potentially prolong survival. Summary: This review summarizes the current state of the literature on the important role of RT for the treatment of metastatic sarcoma organized by the site of metastatic disease. Particularly for patients presenting with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease, consolidative RT is an important local therapy strategy to be considered in a multidisciplinary setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are becoming an increasingly common diagnosis due to improved systemic control and more routine surveillance imaging. Treatment continues to require a multidisciplinary approach managing systemic and intracranial disease burden. Although, improvements have been made in the diagnosis and management of BCBM, brain metastasis patients continue to pose a challenge for practitioners. Methods: In this review, a group of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, breast surgeons, and neurosurgeons specializing in the treatment of breast cancer reviewed the available published literature and compiled a comprehensive review on the current state of BCBM. Results: We discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment options (including systemic, surgical, and radiotherapy treatment modalities), and treatment response evaluation for BCBM. Furthermore, we discuss the ongoing prospective trials enrolling BCBM patients and their biologic rationale. Conclusions: BCBM management is an increasing clinical concern. Multidisciplinary management combining the strengths of surgical, systemic, and radiation treatment modalities with prospective trials incorporating knowledge from the basic and translational sciences will ultimately lead to improved clinical outcomes for BCBM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Elysia K Donovan,1,2 Anand Swaminath1,2 1Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 2Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada Abstract: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a new technology in radiotherapy delivery, allowing for potentially curative treatment in many patients previously felt not to be candidates for radical surgical resection of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several studies have demonstrated very high local control rates using SBRT, and more recent data have suggested overall survival may approach that of surgery in operable patients. However, SBRT is not without unique toxicities, and the balance of toxicity, and effect on patient-reported quality of life need to be considered with respect to oncologic outcomes. We therefore aim to review SBRT in the context of important patient-related factors, including quality of life in several domains (and in comparison to other therapies such as conventional radiation, surgery, or no treatment). We will also describe scenarios in which SBRT may be reasonably offered (i.e. elderly patients and those with severe COPD), and where it may need to be approached with some caution due to increased risks of toxicity (i.e. tumor location, patients with interstitial lung disease). In total, we hope to characterize the physical, emotional, and functional consequences of SBRT, in relation to other management strategies, in order to aid the clinician in deciding whether SBRT is the optimal treatment choice for each patient with early stage NSCLC. Keywords: non-small-cell lung cancer, early stage, stereotactic radiation, quality of life, toxicity

While anti-CEA antibodies have no direct effect on CEA-positive tumors, they can be used to direct potent anti-tumor effects as an antibody-IL-2 fusion protein (immunocytokine, ICK), and at the same time reduce the toxicity of IL-2 as a single agent. Using a fusion protein of humanized anti-CEA with human IL-2 (M5A-IL-2) in a transgenic murine model expressing human CEA, we show high tumor uptake of the ICK to CEA-positive tumors with additional lymph node targeting. ICK treated CEA-positive tumors exhibit significant tumor eradication. Analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes shows a high frequency of both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells along with CD11b positive myeloid cells in ICK treated mice. The frequency of tumor-infiltrating FoxP3+ CD4+ T cells (Tregs) is significantly reduced vs anti-CEA antibody-treated controls, indicating that ICK did not preferentially stimulate migration or proliferation of Tregs to the tumor. Combination therapy with anti-PD-1 antibody did not improve tumor reduction over ICK therapy alone. Since stereotactic tumor irradiation (SRT), commonly used in cancer therapy has immunomodulatory effects, we tested combination SRT+ICK therapy in two tumor model systems. Use of fractionated vs single high dose SRT in combination with ICK resulted in greater tumor inhibition and immunity to tumor rechallenge. In particular, tumor microenvironment and myeloid cell composition appear to play a significant role in the response rate to ICK+SRT combination therapy.

Dysregulated hormonal production remains a challenge in the management of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). We report 4 cases of patients with functional NEN treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to either the primary/dominant metastatic site of disease or the end organ of hormonal release. No significant toxicities were observed during or after treatment. Each patient has had biochemical, clinical and radiographic response to therapy, providing proof of concept that SBRT is an effective therapeutic strategy for functional neuroendocrine neoplasms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]