1. Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Ipilimumab Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery Alone in Melanoma Brain Metastases
- Author
-
Steven M Nguyen, Oliver Vaidis, Aurelio Castrellon, and Andrew E Johnson
- Subjects
Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,stereotactic radiosurgery ,MEDLINE ,Ipilimumab ,Dermatology ,Radiosurgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,parasitic diseases ,medicine ,melanoma ,ipilimumab ,business.industry ,Melanoma ,Hazard ratio ,General Engineering ,medicine.disease ,meta-analysis ,Increased risk ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Meta-analysis ,Radiation Oncology ,brain mets ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,medicine.drug ,Cohort study - Abstract
Benefits of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have been well established in melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Immunotherapy agents such as ipilimumab (ipi) have recently demonstrated clinical efficacy in advanced disease as well. The theoretical synergistic effects of combining these therapies in MBM have not been explored in detail, however, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies that compared combined SRS and ipi versus SRS alone in MBM. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Central databases were used for our literature search, which was conducted by three reviewers. We included studies that examined SRS and ipilimumab compared to SRS alone in MBM. Pertinent results were tabulated in a standardized spreadsheet. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) Risk of Bias Assessment and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method for rating evidence quality were used for qualitative analysis. Review Manager was used for statistical analysis. We identified four cohort studies that compared SRS plus ipi versus SRS alone in MBM. As per the GRADE criteria, we found low-quality evidence for survival benefits associated with combined treatment. Meta-analysis confirmed a significant benefit in survival for SRS and ipilimumab (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.28 - 0.52, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between comparison groups for local control, distant brain control, radiation necrosis, or intracranial bleeding. We conclude that low-quality evidence exists for superior overall survival in MBM treated with SRS and ipilimumab compared to SRS without ipilimumab. There is also no increased risk of radiation necrosis and/or intracranial bleeding with combining radiation and immunotherapy in this setting.
- Published
- 2017