Search

Objective: General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the provision of general outpatient palliative care (AAPV) for the majority of patients at the end of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of End-of-Life Care (EoLC) from a GPs’ perspective using the German version of the General Practice End of Life Care Index (GP-EoLC-I).Methods: Between autumn 2018 and spring 2019, all registered and eligible GPs in two counties in Lower Saxony (n=190) were asked to participate in a survey on EoLC using the German version of the self-assessment questionnaire GP-EoLC-I. The index comprises two subscales: (13 items) and (12 items). The summated index of both subscales measures the quality of EoLC by GPs (25 items; range 14–40). The questionnaire was supplemented by questions on sociodemographic data, indicators for good palliative care (PC) and requirements to improve PC. Quantitative data were analysed by descriptive statistics and free text answers by conventional content analysis according to Hsieh and Shannon.Results: 52 GPs (females: n=16) of 34 practices (single practices: n=26) participated in the study. The mean GP-EoLC-I was 27.5 (SD 4.5). The items revealed potential for improvement: systematic identification of patients with potential PC needs, multidisciplinary case conferences to discuss PC patients, application of care protocols and symptom assessment tools, documentation of patients’ wishes and beliefs as well as inclusion of family and carers. Regarding the indicators for good PC, the most relevant indicators from the GPs’ perspective were collaboration and coordination, integration of relatives, advance care planning and documentation. As requirements to improve PC, GPs highlighted further training and the use of standardised tools such as instruments to support the systematic identification of PC patients.Conclusions: To our knowledge for the first time in Germany, an internationally tested self-assessment questionnaire measuring the quality of EoLC by GPs was applied. The GP-EoLC-I in this study was slightly lower than the index of GPs in the United Kingdom. Including relatives and family carers, implementing tools to support early identification of PC patients and strengthening cooperation between GPs and other stakeholders in PC may be promising approaches to improve general PC and EoLC in Germany.

Background: The strengthening of the general practitioners’ (GPs’) role in palliative care (PC) has been identified as a top priority in order to improve PC in Germany. This study aims at exploring positive and negative experiences in PC in Germany from the perspectives of patients, relatives, and health care professionals in a primary care setting.Methods: Between March 2017 and August 2017, a total of 16 interviews with patients, relatives, GPs, medical assistants, and nurses were conducted. The Critical Incident Technique (CIT) was used to explore factors that influence excellent versus undesirable events in PC provision. Two researchers independently defined and counted critical incidents (CIs) from interview transcripts, performed a thematic analysis, and clustered the CIs into dimensions.Results: In summary, 16 interviews contained 280 CIs, divided into 13ositive and 150 negative CIs. The thematic analysis resulted in seven content domains, with each including positive and negative CIs, respectively: 1) way of care provision, 2) availability of care providers, structures, medication, and aids, 3) general formal conditions of care provision, 4) bureaucracy, 5) working practices in health care teams, 6) quality and outcome of care provision, and 7) communication.Conclusions: The results raise awareness for the aspects that lead to successful or undesirable PC experiences, observed from different perspectives. They open up the potential for primary PC improvement. Future research will facilitate development and implementation of more tailored interventions in order to improve generalists’ PC.

Objective Methods Results Discussion The Progressive Supranuclear Palsy quality of life scale (PSP‐QoL) has been shown to be a useful tool for capturing health‐related quality of life of patients in “everyday life” and in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) research. However, at 45 items in length, the questionnaire can take a long time, exhausting PSP patients, in particular if cognitive impaired, which can have a negative impact on the assessment. The aim of this study was to establish a condensed version of the PSP‐QoL for research and routine clinical care.In this retrospective study, data originating from a German cohort of PSP patients was analyzed. Data from 245 PSP patients were included in this study. The short PSP‐QoL questionnaire was created using a two‐factor solution and item‐total and inter‐item correlations for mental and physical aspects of daily living of the PSP‐QoL followed by confirmatory factor analysis.The final scale included 12 items representing mental (five items) and physical symptoms (seven items). The specified two‐factor model displayed an excellent fit in the confirmatory factor analysis. The short Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Quality of Life scale (PSP‐ShoQoL) correlated moderately with the PSP Rating Scale (r [243] = 0.514, P < 0.001) and Geriatric depression scale (r [231] = 0.548, P < 0.001). Sensitivity to change confirmed a significant decrease in QoL after 12 months.In this study, we created a 12‐item PSP‐ShoQoL designed to “facilitate” daily clinical work that correlated strongly with the PSP‐QoL and was sensitive to change. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In Germany, hospice and palliative care is well covered through inpatient, outpatient, and home-based care services. It is unknown if, and to what extent, there is a need for additional day care services to meet the specific needs of patients and caregivers. Methods: Two day hospices and two palliative day care clinics were selected. In the first step, two managers from each facility (n = 8) were interviewed by telephone, using a semi-structured interview guide. In the second step, four focus groups were conducted, each with three to seven representatives of hospice and palliative care from the facilities' hospice and palliative care networks. Interviews and focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: The interviewed experts perceived day care services as providing additional patient and caregiver benefits. Specifically, the services were perceived to meet patient needs for social interaction and bundled treatments, especially for patients who did not fit into inpatient settings (due to, e.g., their young age or a lack of desire for inpatient admission). The services were also perceived to meet caregiver needs for support, providing short-term relief for the home care situation. Conclusions: The results suggest that inpatient, outpatient, and home-based hospice and palliative care services do not meet the palliative care needs of all patients. Although the population that is most likely to benefit from day care services is assumed to be relatively small, such services may meet the needs of certain patient groups more effectively than other forms of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]