Search

Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is less morbid than open surgery, it still carries risks of significant complications as well as injury to the renal parenchyma. Flexible ureteroscopic stone removal, although causes no appreciable damage to the renal parenchyma, has limitations, most notably, a lower stone-free rate than PCNL. Advances in our knowledge regarding ureteral physiology combined with technical developments applied to ureteral access sheath deployment and size may well propel retrograde intrarenal surgery to the forefront of kidney stone removal, regardless of stone size or location.

To study patients who presented to the Emergency Department with acute renal colic to determine if resolution of hydronephrosis and pain accurately predicts stone passage on follow-up CT.This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial of patients diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) scan with a symptomatic ureteral stone9 mm in diameter. Participants were followed after randomization to evaluate for analgesic use and to assess stone passage and hydronephrosis on a repeat CT scan obtained at 29-36 days.Four-hundred-three patients were randomized in the original study and patients were included in this analysis if they did not have surgery for stone removal and had a CT scan and information on pain medication at follow-up (N = 220). Hydronephrosis was detected in 181 (82%) on initial CT. At follow-up CT, 43 (20%) participants had a persistent ureteral stone. Of these patients, 36 (84%) had no pain, 26 (60%) did not have hydronephrosis, and 23 (53%) had neither pain nor hydronephrosis. Resolution of hydronephrosis was associated with stone passage (RR 4.6, 95% CI 1.9, 11.0), while resolution of pain was not (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9, 1.4).In patients with urinary stone disease, stone passage is associated with resolution of hydronephrosis but not resolution of pain. In patients with persistent ureteral stones, neither pain nor hydronephrosis are consistently present. These findings have important implications on follow-up imaging of patients with urinary stone disease.

Summary. Purpose. To optimize the tactics of endoscopic interventions for cholelithiasis complicated by obstruction of the terminal portion of the common bile duct to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality in elderly and senile people. Materials and methods. The results of examination and treatment of 221 elderly and senile patients with cholelithiasis complicated by obstruction of the terminal section of the common bile duct were analyzed. Results. Using of existing methods and proposed new methods of endoscopic management of cholelithiasis complicated by obstruction of the terminal section of the common bile duct allow to reliably reduce the incidence of postoperative complications in elderly and senile patients from 19.8 to 9.5%, postoperative mortality from 10.3 to 2.9% Conclusions. In elderly and senile patients with obstruction of the terminal section of the common bile duct and common bile duct stones who bear high operational risk, endoscopic papillosphincterotomy with stone removal is a sufficient method of treatment. In case of unremovable common bile duct stones, endoscopic papillosphincterotomy and stenting allow to avoid revision of the common bile duct, and in high-risk patients those methods allow to refrain from open surgery.

Renal stones are the third most common problem affecting about 10% of global population. The management of nephrolithiasis has undergone a complete transformation since the 1980s. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has established itself an effective and safe technique that delivers high stone-free rate as well as overall shorter treatment time. We aim to compare the outcome of mini-PCNL with standard-PCNL in patients presenting with renal stones. In all, 90 patients fulfilled the selection criteria and randomized into two groups. Group A underwent mini-PCNL whereas Group B underwent standard-PCNL. Pre-operative hemoglobin level was recorded. Duration of procedure as well as drop in hemoglobin level was also recorded. A kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) X-ray was performed to confirm the presence of of stone and stone-free status. The mean age of patients in mini-PCNL group was 43.11 years and in standard-PCNL group, it was 36.91 years. The mean stone size in patients of mini-PCNL group was 29.53 mm and 31.58 mm in standard-PCNL group. The mean duration of renal stone in mini-PCNL group was 1.91 years and that in standard-PCNL group 1.80 years. The mean operative time in mini-PCNL group was 59.56 min and 61.22 min in standard-PCNL group. The mean fall in hemoglobin in mini-PCNL group was 0.38 g/dL and that in standard-PCNL group 0.51 g/dL. In mini-PCNL group, stone clearance was observed in 42 (93.3%) patients, while in standard-PCNL group, it was observed in 45 (100%) patients. This difference was insignificant (P > 0.05). Mini-PCNL and standard-PCNL have no significant differences in terms of outcome, operative time, and stone clearance, although fall in hemoglobin level was less in mini-PCNL group, which showed less blood loss in this group, thereby making it a more appropriate method for renal stone removal.

Objectives/hypothesis For patients with submandibular sialolithiasis, there are many gland-preserving treatment options including sialendoscopy. Sialendoscopy, however, requires expensive instrumentation with limited availability, which may not be required for routine cases. The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients with submandibular sialolithiasis undergoing sialendoscopy versus those undergoing transoral incisional sialithotomy. Study design Longitudinal, prospective study of patient undergoing gland-preserving therapy for submandibular sialolithiasis. Methods The study was a prospective, nonrandomized trial of 30 patients with submandibular sialolithiasis who received gland-preserving treatment by either sialendoscopy-assisted techniques (Scope group; 14 patients) or transoral sialithotomy with or without dochoplasty (No Scope group; 16 patients). Factors analyzed between the two groups included age, race, gender, size of stone, location of stone, gland(s) involved, surgical method, and modified salivary Oral Health Impact Profile (sOHIP) scores before and after therapy. Results There were no significant differences between the Scope and No Scope groups regarding age, race, or gender. There was a significant difference in stone size between the groups, with the No Scope group having larger stones on average. Both treatments led to statistically significant symptomatic improvement in sOHIP scores. There was no statistically significant difference in salivary quality of life improvement between the Scope and No Scope groups (P = .33). Conclusions Sialendoscopy is an important diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the management of salivary disorders, but is not associated with improved outcomes in gland-preserving treatments for routine submandibular sialolithiasis. Transoral stone removal alone may have equivalent symptomatic outcomes in the management of select sialoliths. Level of evidence III Laryngoscope, 2021.

Introduction and Objectives We aimed to point out the ureteral access facility and obstruction removal efficiency of mini-URS in the use of proximal ureteral stone management in children under five-year-old. Patients We retrospectively reviewed the data of 26 children who underwent mini-URS-LL for obstructive stones in proximal ureter between January 2016 and August 2018. The effectiveness of the mini-URS-LL was assessed based on the feasibility, reliability, and success of the technique. Results Mean age was 3 ± 1.3 years, and 11 (42.3%) patients were ≤2 years old, remaining 15 (57.7%) were aged 3−5 years. Mean stone size was 9.11 ± 3.02 mm. A stone-free status was obtained at the end of 31 ureteroscopic procedure in 24 (92.3%) patients. The mean age was found significantly higher in patients who had the procedure without pre-stenting than the others who did (P = .027). No perioperative complication was experienced. Conclusion In preschool-age children, laser lithotripsy with mini-URS may be a safe technique in the hands with advanced endo-urological skills but it has low efficacy with higher rates of prestenting causing additional anesthesia sessions.

Objective The safety and prognosis of complete stone removal for the treatment of choledocholithiasis in older patients are unknown. This multicenter retrospective study assessed the outcomes of complete stone removal in elderly patients (≥90 years) with respect to the prognosis. Methods We divided patients who underwent endoscopic cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis into two groups: complete stone removal or incomplete stone removal with plastic stent insertion. The patient characteristics, adverse events, number of endoscopic cholangiopancreatographies, overall survival rates, and disease-specific cumulative death were compared between the groups. Patients Two hundred and twenty-three participants ≥90 years old were included in the study, including 48 (22%) men and 175 (78%) women. The median age was 92 (range, 90-104) years old. There were 160 (72%) and 63 (28%) patients in the complete and incomplete groups, respectively. Results: The age, performance status, comorbidities, severe complication rates, and stone diameter were comparable between the groups. The proportion of patients with at least 5 stones was significantly higher in the incomplete group than in the complete group (complete group: 8.1% [13/160] and incomplete group: 21% [13/63], p

The detection of residual or fragmented common bile duct (CBD) stones after lithotripsy can be improved by the high-resolution imaging quality of digital, single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC). However, therapeutic interventions for the removal of residual CBD stones are limited by the lack of appropriate tools. We retrospectively evaluated the role of SOC and the newly developed Dormia basket for the evaluation and removal of stones remaining after lithotripsy. Thirty-four patients who had undergone lithotripsy for retained CBD stones with no evidence of filling defects in occluded balloon cholangiography from March 2017 to October 2018 were included in the study. After balloon cholangiography, the bile duct was evaluated by SOC for complete evacuation of the stones. The detected residual CBD stones were directly retrieved by inserting the newly developed Dormia basket into the working channel of the SOC. The incidence of residual stones detected by SOC and the success rate of residual stone retrieval by SOC were investigated. Digital SOC was successfully performed in all patients. Of these, 11 patients (32.4%) had residual CBD stones. The residual stones were successfully removed in 10 patients (90.9%) by SOC using the Dormia basket, except in one case of residual stones left in the hepatic duct. There were no adverse events associated with the SOC procedures or direct stone removal. Digital SOC combined with the newly developed Dormia basket was useful for the detection and extraction of residual CBD stones under direct visualization after lithotripsy.

To evaluate factors affecting the outcomes of short-term Mono-J insertion for 6 h following ureteroscopic stone removal. Patients treated with a Mono-J for 6 h after ureterorenoscopy and stone removal were analysed. FaST 1 and 2 (Fast Track Stent Studies), two consecutive single academic centre studies, were conducted between August 2014 and April 2018. In each study, we randomized patients with renal or ureteral calculi to two groups before ureterorenoscopy. FaST 1 compared a Mono-J insertion for 6 h versus Double-J insertion for 3–5 days after ureterorenoscopy. FaST 2 compared a Mono-J insertion to a tubeless procedure in the same clinical setting. All patients were pre-stented for 3–5 days before URS. The study endpoint was stent-related symptoms as assessed by a validated questionnaire (USSQ). Results were stratified by clinical parameters, stone characteristics and operation details. 108 of 156 initially randomized patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy were included. USSQ scores covering the time 3–5 weeks after stone removal showed a significantly reduced urinary symptoms and pain index compared to the scores before ureterorenoscopy. USSQ results before and after stone removal did not correlate with stone size or operation time and did not differ significantly depending on stone localization, the treating endourologist, or ureterorenoscopic device used (p > 0.05). Six patients (5%) required reintervention. Following secondary ureterorenoscopy and ureteral drainage with a Mono-J for 6 h, quality of life is independent of stone size and localization, operation time, the treating endourologist, and the URS device used. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00240-021-01264-4.

Objective Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is widely used for removing multiple large common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, the safety and effectiveness of immediate EPLBD after limited EST and EPLBD at an interval after limited EST is unclear. Thus, this multicenter retrospective study was conducted to examine this matter. Methods Propensity score-matching was performed to adjust the baseline characteristics between the immediate and interval EPLBD groups. We compared the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications and the early outcomes of ERCP between the 2 matched groups, which comprised 66 patients each. Results The complete stone clearance rate in each study group was 100%. The overall incidence of post-ERCP complications in the propensity score-matched interval and immediate EPLBD groups was 3/33 (9.1%) and 1/33 (3.0%), respectively (p=0.61). The immediate EPLBD group had significantly fewer mean ERCP sessions for complete stone removal and a significantly lower rate of endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy (EML) usage than the interval EPLBD group (1.6 vs. 2.4 sessions, p

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous stone removal using a compliant balloon after papillary balloon dilatation.Between March 2014 and May 2020, 123 patients with choledocholithiasis, in whom endoscopy was unsuccessful, were enrolled in this study. The ampulla of Vater was dilated using a noncompliant balloon, and stone removal was attemptedBiliary stones were completely removed in 118 of 123 patients. Major complications occurred in five patients. One patient experienced duodenal bleeding, which was successfully treated by endoscopy. Hemobilia occurred in three patients, which required transfusion, and one patient experienced four days of abdominal pain. Minor complications, including self-limiting pain, effusion, minimal hemobilia, elevated amylase and fever, occurred in 21 patients. Stone size was the only significant risk factor associated with the rate of complications (Odds ratio: 1.14, 95% confidence interval = 1.04, 1.26). Bilirubin and white blood cell levels significantly decreased after the procedure.Percutaneous stone removal using a compliant balloon after papillary balloon dilatation is a safe and effective method in patients in whom endoscopic or surgical treatment is not feasible.

Background and study aim Management of bile duct stones (BDSs) in patients with surgically altered anatomies (SAAs) remains challenging. An endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade (EUS-AG) procedure and double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (DB-ERC) have been used to remove BDSs from patients with SAAs. However, few comparative data have been reported. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of the techniques. Methods This was a single-center retrospective study. Patients with SAA who underwent the EUS-AG procedure or DB-ERC to remove intra- or extra-BDSs between November 2010 and March 2020 were included. The primary outcome was the technical success rate, defined as stent insertion or stone removal during the initial session. The secondary outcomes were the procedure time, incidence of adverse events (AEs), and complete stone removal rate. Results Of the 54 patients enrolled, 23 underwent the EUS-AG procedure and 31 DB-ERC. The technical success rates of EUS-AG and DB-ERC were 87.0% and 64.5%, respectively (P = 0.11). The procedure time was significantly shorter in the EUS-AG group than in the DB-ERC group (51.9 ± 15.4 vs 72.6 ± 32.2 min; P = 0.01), and the early AE rates were 26.1% and 12.9%, respectively (P = 0.71). The complete stone removal rates in patients who underwent previous stone removal were 94.1% in the EUS-AG group and 85.7% in the DB-ERC group (P = 0.61). Conclusion The EUS-AG afforded technical success and complete stone removal rates comparable with those of DB-ERC, but the former procedure was shorter. The AE rate was acceptable.

There is plethora of treatment options for surgeons dealing with salivary stones. During recent decades, emphasis has been laid on gland-preserving minimally invasive techniques for stone removal. In this context, visualization of salivary ducts with semirigid endoscopes for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, the so-called sialendoscopy, has become increasingly important. This article gives an overview of indications for sialendoscopy and how the procedure is performed. Furthermore, sialendoscopy is discussed in the context of other modalities for salivary stone treatment.

Background In ureterorenoscopy, anaesthesiologists are preferring regional anaesthesia to avoid postoperative complications, while surgeons are preferring general anaesthesia to avoid ureteral trauma. China has not published its guidelines and not referring to the European Association of Urology guidelines. The objectives of study were to evaluate the effects of general, spinal, and epidural anaesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes of ureterorenoscopy. Methods Charts of a total of 392 patients with the American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade I or II, and underwent flexible ureterorenoscopy for removal of the proximal, middle, or distal ureteral single stone under general anaesthesia (GA group; n = 145) or spinal anaesthesia (SA group; n = 131) or epidural anaesthesia (EA group; n = 116) were reviewed retrospectively. Results The dilatation time for patients of GA group was fewer than those of SA (104.01 ± 12.77 sec/patient vs. 130.55 ± 22.53 sec/patient, p

Purpose: Low-dose computer tomography (NCCT) is the standard imaging modality for patients with acute flank pain with a suspicion of urolithiasis. The stone size is usually measured 2D by a radiologist. We compared 3D stone measurement using different windows to the 2D measurement and evaluated the clinical impact on ureterorenoscopic stone removal (URS). Methods: One hundred sixty-four patients (201 stones) with a preoperative NCCT, following a URS within 4 weeks, were included in this study. Stone location, number and size of stones, operating time, and laser lithotripsy were documented. Stones were measured in 3D using bone and soft tissue window. The maximum diameter was compared to the radiological report. The U test, Kruskal-Wallis, and regression were used for statistical analyses. Results: Almost two-thirds (64.68%; 130 stones) of stone measurements in 3D with the bone window were lower than the radiologist reports in 2D. One-third (34.83%; 70 stones) of stone measurements were higher and 0.5% (1 stone) reported the same size. Using the 3D soft tissue window, 81.09% (163 stones), 17.91% (37 stones), and 1% (2 stones) of stones were measured bigger, smaller, or had the same measurement results, respectively. In the clinical setting, we could calculate a cutoff for laser lithotripsy at a maximum stone diameter of 5.70 mm (p < 0.01) with the 3D and 6.01 mm with the 2D measurements, respectively, and found a significant correlation between maximum stone diameter and operating time (p < 0.01) and number of stones and operating time (p < 0.01 with and p = 0.02 without laser). Conclusion: 3D stone measurement with bone window seems to be more accurate than 2D measurement, but 2D is sufficient for planning stone treatment.

Background: Urolithiasis is the most common and painful urological disease. Intracorporeal lithotripsy has high success rate in management of ureteric stone. Objective: To do comparison of the intracorporeal ultrasonic lithotripsy and intracorporeal pneumatic lithotripsy in terms of rate of stone removal and post-operative complications. Study Design: Randomized Control Trial. Settings: Department of Urology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore Pakistan. Duration: Six months from September 01, 2015 to February 29, 2016. Methodology: Total sixty patients were selected fulfilling the inclusion criteria into 2 groups. In group A, 30 patients were selected for intracorporeal ultrasonic lithotripsy and in group B, 30 patients were selected for intracorporeal pneumatic lithotripsy. In both groups all patients were compared in terms of rate of stone removal and postoperative complications then results were analyzed by SPSS 21. Results: Mean stone size in group A (Ultrasonic lithotripsy) was 1.13 ± 0.17 cm and in group B (Pneumatic lithotripsy) was 1.14 ± 0.18 cm. At first week after procedure, in group A 25(83.33%) and in group B 21(70%) of the cases had stone clearance, at 2nd week after procedure a total of 26(86.66%) in group A and 24(80%) cases in group B had stone clearance. At 3rd week after procedure there were 28(93.33%) cases in group A and 27(90%) cases in group B had stone clearance. The stone clearance in both groups at each follow up was statistically insignificant, p-value > 0.05. At 1st week, in group A 3(10%) cases and in group B 6(20%) cases had pain, at 2nd week after procedure there were 1(3.33%) cases in group A and 3(10%) in group B who reported pain and at 3rd week after procedure there were 1(3.3%) case in each group had pain. The pain at each follow up was statistically same in both groups, p-value > 0.05. According to complications, in group A and group B, 2(6.66%) and 3(10%) cases had fever, 3(10%) and 4(13.33%) had infection respectively. Only one case (3.3%) had retention of urine. All complications were statistically same in both groups, p-value > 0.05. Conclusion: Through the findings of this study we conclude that both intracorporeal pneumatic lithotripsy and intracorporeal ultrasonic lithotripsy are equally effective and had fewer complications. However, the ultrasonic procedure had higher rate of stone removal at each follow up (but difference was insignificant with similar morbidity compared to pneumatic devices.

Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis is a chronic infection characterized by intrahepatic biliary stones and strictures. Escherichia coli is the commonest infecting organism. This disease is very common in East Asia but infrequent in Western countries, and few reports have been published in European series. The therapeutic approach for hepatolithiasis is highly individual and includes antibiotic therapy, endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage with stone removal and dilation of strictures, surgical resection of affected liver segments and liver transplantation. We report two cases of RCP in Chinese patients treated with liver transplantation at our center out of the 34 published in the literature.

Secondary intra- and extrahepatic bile duct dilatation is a very common condition that can be caused by several diseases. However, it has been rarely discussed in the specialized literature. Moreover, no distinct etiology can be determined in some cases, which hampers the diagnosis and treatment. Here, we discuss the etiological classification and treatment strategies of secondary intra- and extrahepatic bile duct dilatation based on an extensive literature review, as well as our experimental research and clinical experience. The etiology of secondary intra- and extrahepatic bile duct dilatation can be classified in different ways. From a clinicopathological perspective, it can be classified into obstruction-, lesion-, and compression-induced dilatation. Treatment varies depending on the cause. For example, endoscopic dilation or stenting is used for biliary strictures, laparoscopic choledochectomy for stone removal, and resection for cholangiocarcinoma.

Purpose:Ureteral access sheaths are commonly used during ureteroscopy to facilitate stone removal, improve visibility and maintain low intrarenal pressures. However, the use of a ureteral access sh...

To assess the effect of our new classification on surgical outcomes after flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for kidney stones.We retrospectively examined 128 patients after single renal fURS procedures performed using ureteral access sheaths (UASs) with the fragmentation technique. Based on the gap (calculated by subtracting the ureteroscope diameter from the UAS diameter), enrolled patients were divided into three groups: small ( 0.6 mm), medium (0.6 to 1.2 mm), and large space groups (≥ 1.2 mm). Stone-free (SF) status was defined as either complete absence of stones (SF) or the presence of stones 4 mm in diameter on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT).The SF rate was significantly lower in the small space group (50% in small, 97.9% in medium, 89.2% in large; p = 0.001). Perioperative complications over Clavien-Dindo Grade I were observed in 16.7%, 4.2%, and 8.1% of patients, respectively (p = 0.452). The ratio of stone volume and operative time (efficiency of stone removal) was significantly higher in the large space group compared to the small and medium space groups (0.009 ± 0.003 ml/min, 0.013 ± 0.005 ml/min, 0.027 ± 0.012 ml/min, respectively; p 0.001).Our findings that gaps 0.6 mm (1.8 Fr), including the combination of a 9.5-Fr UAS and a small caliber ureteroscope, improve SF rates, and larger gaps facilitate stone removal efficiency providing the basis for future development of clinical protocols aimed at improving outcomes.

Background The study aimed to construct an intelligent difficulty scoring and assistance system (DSAS) for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. Methods 1954 cholangiograms were collected from three hospitals for training and testing the DSAS. The D-LinkNet34 and U-Net were adopted to segment the CBD, stones, and duodenoscope. Based on the segmentation results, the stone size, distal CBD diameter, distal CBD arm, and distal CBD angulation were estimated. The performance of segmentation and estimation was assessed by mean intersection over union (mIoU) and average relative error. A technical difficulty scoring scale, which was used for assessing the technical difficulty of CBD stone removal, was developed and validated. We also analyzed the relationship between scores evaluated by the DSAS and clinical indicators including stone clearance rate and need for endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) and lithotripsy. Results The mIoU values of the stone, CBD, and duodenoscope segmentation were 68.35 %, 86.42 %, and 95.85 %, respectively. The estimation performance of the DSAS was superior to nonexpert endoscopists. In addition, the technical difficulty scoring performance of the DSAS was more consistent with expert endoscopists than two nonexpert endoscopists. A DSAS assessment score ≥ 2 was correlated with lower stone clearance rates and more frequent EPLBD. Conclusions An intelligent DSAS based on deep learning was developed. The DSAS could assist endoscopists by automatically scoring the technical difficulty of CBD stone extraction, and guiding the choice of therapeutic approach and appropriate accessories during ERCP.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided interventions are often performed using a single guidewire (SGW), but there are a few reports on the use of double guidewire (DGW) technique to facilitate multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. This DGW technique may have advantages other than multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided interventions such as scope stabilization, support for stone extraction and device insertion. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided interventions between Feb 2012 and Apr 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The rate and reasons of DGW technique, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. DGW technique was performed, using an uneven double lumen cannula (UDLC), which facilitates insertion of 0.025-in. and 0.035-in. guidewires. A total of 249 EUS-guided interventions were analyzed, and DGW technique was utilized primarily in 65 cases (25.7%) and as a salvage after failed SGW technique in 18 cases (7.1%). The reasons for DGW technique were 60 multiple drainage placement, 10 scope stabilization, 7 device insertion, 5 safety guidewire, and 4 antegrade stone removal. Insertion of UDLC and DGW was successful in 100%. Technical success rate of preplanned interventions was 92.7% (96.9% in primary DGW and 77.8% in salvage DGW technique). Adverse events were observed in 19.5% after DGW but were not related to DGW technique. DGW technique using UDLC during EUS-guided interventions was technically feasible and safe. In addition to multiple drainage insertion, it can potentially support complex EUS-guided interventions.

BACKGROUND Common bile duct stones (choledocholithiasis) generally lead to several health problems such as pain, jaundice, infection, acute pancreatitis etc. For which it needs surgical intervention. We conducted this study to compare success and complication rate between ERCP stone removal and open CBD exploration. METHODS A total of 50 patients were selected from those attending Department of Surgery of KPC Medical College and were divided in two groups randomly, with 25 patients in each group. Group I patients underwent ERCP stone removal while those in Group II were subjected to open CBD exploration. Both the groups were compared on the basis of their success and complication rate, time taken for the procedure, time taken to return to work, and duration of hospital stay. RESULTS A total of 50 patients were selected, with mean age being 37.5 ± 11.71 yrs., 62% were female and 38% male. In Group I success rate was 92% and in Group II it was 96%. Complication rate was significantly more (p=.032504) in Group II (45.83%) compared to that in Group I (13.04%). Time taken for the procedure in Group I (36.09 ± 6.39 mins) was much less than that in Group II (120.63 ± 11.92 mins). Mean duration of hospital stay in group I was 2.91 ± 1.08 days while in Group II it was 11.79 ± 1.58 days. 8.35 ± 1.61 days were taken to return to work in Group I compared to 20.53 ± 1.95 days in Group II. CONCLUSIONS This comparative study of CBD stone removal is a small endeavour on our part to assess the advantages of ERCP stone removal. With appropriate infrastructure ERCP stone removal carries a greater advantage compared to that by open surgery.

Objective To compare the safety and effectiveness of using a conventional nephrostomy sheath (NS) vs using a new NS with suction and evacuation functions in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for the treatment of staghorn stones. Patients and methods A prospective and randomised study of 60 patients with staghorn stones randomly assigned into two groups of 30 patients. One group underwent MPCNL using conventional NS, whereas the other group underwent MPCNL with suction-evacuation NS (SENS). Patient demographics, stone characteristics, intraoperative data, perioperative data, and surgical results were collected and analysed. Results The patient demographics and stone characteristics were similar amongst the two groups. The SENS group had a significantly lower peak and a significantly lower average renal pelvic pressure (RPP) throughout the procedure. The SENS group was more efficient for stone removal and had a much shorter stone treatment time, a lesser use of the stone extractor, and ultimately a higher stone-free rate (SFR). The effects of a lower RPP and shorter stone treatment time translated into less severe postoperative complications as measured per modified Clavien grade. Conclusion Using SENS in MPCNL for the treatment of staghorn stones has the advantages of lower RPP, increased effectiveness in stone retrieval, decreased surgery related complications, and an improved SFR.

Background and Aim Endoscopic stone removal has some complications. Although the life expectancy of elderly patients has increased dramatically worldwide, little information is available on the necessity of complete endoscopic stone removal in extremely elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of complete endoscopic stone removal in extremely elderly patients. Methods All extremely elderly patients (>90 years) who underwent endoscopic stone removal for choledocholithiasis at our hospital between January 2012 and January 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. The included patients were divided into complete stone removal and incomplete stone removal groups. Complication rate, overall survival (OS), and disease‐specific survival (DSS) rates were compared between the two groups. Results Overall, 73 patients were included in this study. The median number of stones was one (range, 0–10) and two (range, 1–12) (P = 0.043), while the median diameter of the largest stones was 9 (range, 0–27) and 14 (range, 5–46) mm (P = 0.001) in the complete and incomplete stone removal groups, respectively. During the follow‐up period, OS was 60% and 39% and DSS was 95% and 97% in the complete and incomplete stone removal groups, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis found no significant difference in OS and DSS between the two groups (P = 0.052 and P = 0.646, respectively). Conclusion Complete stone removal might not always be necessary in extremely elderly patients aged ≥90 years., A total of 73 extremely elderly patients (>90 years) who underwent endoscopic stone removal for choledocholithiasis were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into complete stone removal and incomplete stone removal (plastic stent insertion) groups. Kaplan–Meier analysis found no significant difference in overall survival (OS), and disease‐specific survival (DSS) between the two groups.

At least 90% of stones are extracted after conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, some cases are still difficult to manage completely. We describe some methods of removing difficult common bile duct stones through a single-operator cholangioscopy using SpyGlass system, direct peroral cholangioscopy, and temporary biliary stenting.