Search

Oral azacitidine (Oral-AZA) is recommended as maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND AML) achieving remission with intensive chemotherapy (IC) but not transplant candidates; venetoclax plus injectable azacitidine (VEN-AZA) is recommended for patients ineligible for IC. Some patients may be considered candidates for either regimen. This retrospective study used Flatiron Health's database to compare treatment patterns and clinical outcomes with Oral-AZA maintenance after IC (IC🡪Oral-AZA) versus frontline VEN-AZA. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed at 4 different time points, including from Oral-AZA initiation (IC🡪Oral-AZA cohort) or from remission (VEN-AZA cohort) in the Core Analysis. Median RFS was 14.9 and 8.1 months for IC🡪Oral-AZA and VEN-AZA propensity score-matched cohorts, in the Core Analysis ( n  = 32 in each; p  = 0.027); median OS was 18.7 and 15.2 months ( p  = 0.034). In patients with AML, IC🡪Oral-AZA significantly improved RFS and OS compared with VEN-AZA.

Introduction: The substantial economic burden of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) could be reduced with post-remission maintenance therapies that delay relapse. Real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) data and costs among patients with AML receiving oral azacitidine (Oral-AZA) maintenance therapy or no maintenance are not well understood. We characterize HCRU and costs among these patients in clinical practice in the USA., Methods: Data from IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus (January 1, 2016-June 30, 2022) were used. Patients ≥ 18 years who were newly diagnosed with AML, received first-line systemic induction therapy, and attained disease remission were eligible. Patients receiving Oral-AZA maintenance and those receiving no maintenance ("watch and wait" [W&W]) were matched 1:3 on baseline characteristics using propensity score matching (PSM) and followed until hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or end of continuous insurance enrollment, whichever occurred first. Outcomes included treatment patterns, inpatient and outpatient visits, and costs., Results: After PSM, the Oral-AZA cohort included 43 patients and the W&W cohort 129. Of the 43 patients receiving Oral-AZA, 88.4% started at the recommended dose of 300 mg and 11.6% at 200 mg. The Oral-AZA cohort had significantly (p = 0.0025) longer median (95% CI) time to relapse from the index maintenance date (median not reached [NR; 9.0 months-NR] vs 3.3 months [0.8 months-NR]), and fewer per person per month (PPPM) hospitalizations (0.23 vs 0.61; p = 0.0005) and overall outpatient visits (5.77 vs 7.58; p = 0.0391) than the W&W cohort. Despite higher AML drug costs PPPM in the Oral-AZA cohort ($16,401 vs $10,651 for W&W), total healthcare costs PPPM were lower ($25,786 vs $38,530 for W&W; p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with Oral-AZA maintenance in clinical practice had prolonged remission and lower HCRU and costs than patients receiving no maintenance therapy. These findings underscore the clinical and economic value of Oral-AZA in clinical practice., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Intensive chemotherapy (IC) is commonly used to achieve remission in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Venetoclax plus azacitidine (VEN-AZA) is FDA-approved to treat patients with AML aged ≥ 75 years or who are ineligible for IC. This retrospective analysis used de-identified electronic health records from the US-based Flatiron Health database from patients diagnosed 11/21/2018 to 10/31/2021 to compare treatment outcomes with VEN-AZA vs. IC. Patients were 1:1 propensity score-matched ([Formula: see text]). Assessments included rates of complete remission (CR) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS). CR and HSCT rates were higher with IC than with VEN-AZA (60.9% vs. 44.2% [P = 0.006] and 18.1% vs. 8.0% [P = 0.012], respectively). Median OS was 17.7 months in patients treated with IC and 11.3 months with VEN-AZA without censoring (P = 0.278) and 13.7 vs. 10.6 months, respectively, with censoring at HSCT (P = 0.584). Median RFS was 12.0 months in patients treated with IC vs. 9.5 months with VEN-AZA without censoring (P = 0.431) and 6.4 vs. 7.4 months, respectively, with censoring at HSCT (P = 0.444). No OS or RFS differences observed between the two arms reached statistical significance. Randomized controlled trials comparing the two approaches are warranted, as are novel approaches to reduce relapse rates following CR., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Hsp90 C-terminal modulation represents an attractive strategy for the development of potent and safer antitumor compounds. Continuing our investigation on DHPM type inhibitors here we report a new set of potent C-terminal ligands which allowed us to identify the key structural features crucial for the biological activity.

Hsp90 C-terminal ligands are potential new anti-cancer drugs alternative to the more studied N-terminal inhibitors. Here we report the identification of a new dihydropyrimidinone binding the C-terminus, which is not structurally related to other well-known natural and nature-inspired inhibitors of this second druggable Hsp90 site.

The recently crystallized structure of microsomal prostaglandin E2 synthase 1 (mPGES-1) in complex with the inhibitor LVJ (PDB code: 4BPM) offered new structural information for the optimization of the previously identified lead compound 1 (IC50 = 4.16 ± 0.47 μM), which contains the privileged dihydropyrimidin-2-one chemical core. Systematic optimization of 1, through accurate structure-based design, provided compound 4 with a 10-fold improved mPGES-1 inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.41 ± 0.02 μM). Here we highlight the optimal scaffold decoration pattern of 4 and propose a three-dimensional model for the interaction with this complex trimeric membrane protein. The reported computational insights, together with the accessible one-pot synthetic procedure, stimulate for the generation of further potent dihydropyrimidine-based mPGES-1 inhibitors.

Agents targeting microsomal prostaglandin E2 synthase-1 (mPGES-1) would inhibit only PGE2 production induced by inflammatory stimuli and thus could represent a valuable alternative to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as they should be free from the severe side effects of the classic anti-inflammatory drugs. Although several mPGES-1 inhibitors have been so far identified, none of them is currently in clinical trials, therefore the discovery of new molecular platforms, able to interfere with this interesting target, is urgently required. Here, we report the results of a focused collection of dyhidropyrimidin-2(1H)-one based molecules projected by Virtual Screening computational techniques. The key interactions with the receptor counterpart were introduced as a qualitative filter for the selection of the most promising compounds. The biological data obtained are consistent with the computer-aided suggestions and disclosed two interesting molecules showing in vitro mPGES-1 inhibitory activity in the low μM range., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)