We present a case of origin of the left 8th to 11th intercostal, right 7th to 11th intercostal and both subcostal arteries from a common trunk arising dorsally off the aorta at the level of the first lumbar vertebral body (figure (figure1).1). Aside from being unique in our experience, there is no simple explanation for the embryological origin of a common trunk with bilateral intercostal distribution. Figure 1 The patient, a 45-year-old woman, was undergoing preoperative spinal angiography to identify the origin of the artery of thoracolumbar enlargement before surgery on a congenital kyphosis with associated fusion abnormalities (figure (figure2).2). The artery of Adamkiewicz arose from the right subcostal artery (figure (figure1).1). The vascularisation of the spinal cord appeared to have conventional topography at the thoracolumbar level. Figure 2 There is recognised variability in the size, number and site of origin of the intercostal arteries 1,2,3. The typical pattern in the lower thoracic region is paired distribution directly off the aorta. Variations include hypoplasia and atresia of individual intercostal arteries, usually with reconstitution of the vessel concerned by anastomotic channels from adjacent levels. These anastomoses are usually proximal, though if the anastomosis develops further distally, the proximal portion of the intersegmental precursor of the intercostal artery may persist as an isolated segment and has been described as supplying the artery of thoracolumbar enlargement11. Supernumerary intercostal arteries or vessels with a partial or complete septum may also be seen. Where common trunks arise, these typically supply two or more ipsilateral intercostal arteries, sometimes with additional supply to bronchi or more rarely other viscera. A common trunk to both left and right intercostal arteries at one level is also relatively common, especially at more caudal levels. It has been noted that the aorta may bridge the apex of a kyphosis4,5,6. An association between variability of aortic branches 6 and specifically of the intercostal and segmental arteries5,6 has also been described in patients with kyphosis. In vertebral body maldevelopment, vascular anomalies and in particular variation in segmental artery distribution has been described 4. The vascular anomalies do not necessarily occur at the level of vertebral body abnormality5. In zebrafish, development of the dorsal aortae and other midline structures is probably influenced by the notochord7. If this is also true in humans, it may explain the association between vertebral body and vascular maldevelopment. On the other hand, ischaemia due to proximal occlusion of the intercostal arteries has been demonstrated to cause scoliosis, probably due to abnormal neuromuscular function in the paravertebral muscles8. The intercostal arteries are derived from the intersegmental arteries, in turn arising from the initially paired dorsal aortae that run the entire length of the embryo. These normally fuse to form a single dorsal aorta, early in development. This fusion occurs just caudal to the branchial/pharyngeal arches. Paired intersegmental arteries arise from the dorsal aorta to pass between the somites. In the neck, these join to form the vertebral arteries and most of the original connections to the dorsal aorta disappear. The paired intersegmental arteries are said to persist in the thorax as the paired intercostal arteries and in the abdomen as the paired lumbar arteries1,9. The median sacral artery represents the caudal end of the fused dorsal aortae and their intersegmental branches. If this conventionally held belief is accurate, it is difficult to explain the existence of a common trunk arising from the thoracic aorta with multiple intercostal arteries to both sides arising from it. If the intersegmental arteries persist unaltered as the intercostal arteries then a trunk to bilateral intercostal arteries and a separate descending thoracic aorta imply either that the trunk: 1) was derived directly from both dorsal aortae with their intersegmental arteries attached or 2) was derived from the definitive aorta and intercostal arteries after fusion of the dorsal aortae or 3) represents one dorsal aorta with its intersegmental arteries and the contralateral intersegmental arteries were transferred to the trunk from the contralateral dorsal aorta which persisted as the definitive aorta or 4) was derived from a longitudinal vessel other than the definitive aorta or dorsal aortae. The first of these hypotheses seems improbable as the definitive aorta represents the fused dorsal aortae. The second seems equally unlikely, as it would necessitate detachment of a long segment of definitive aortic wall with its attached intercostal arteries, after fusion of the dorsal aortae. In connection with the third of these mechanisms, it is interesting to note that caudal to the seventh intersegmental artery, the right dorsal aorta ordinarily disappears, to reappear inferiorly and fuse with the left dorsal aorta to form the descending thoracic aorta1 A possible explanation for this common trunk is anomalous persistence of part of the right dorsal aorta and its attached intersegmental arteries, though for a trunk with bilateral distribution, either there would have to be subsequent transfer of the corresponding left intersegmental arteries or the intersegmental arteries would have to arise in situ and fuse with the nearest (in this case anomalous) vessel. The fact that a segment of the right dorsal aorta normally regresses implies that in the normal course of development the intercostal arteries are capable of deriving their origin from a vessel other than the dorsal aorta from which their intersegmental precursor arose. Candidates for the longitudinal vessel of the fourth hypothesis include the precostal anastomoses, which may be present between the intersegmental arteries1 Superior intercostal arteries represent the persistence of these longitudinal anastomotic channels 1,10. The configuration of this common trunk has similarity to the superior intercostal arteries, however, they are not bilateral and are more superior. A possible explanation for this anomalous trunk is fusion of persistent bilateral longitudinal precostal anastomoses and their associated intersegmental vessels. This hypothesis is appealing as it avoids having to postulate transfer of intersegmental or intercostal vessels. Instead, if the original connections of the longitudinal precostal anastomoses to the dorsal aortae (the proximal parts of the intersegmental arteries) gradually regressed, paired longitudinal trunks with unilateral distribution, analogous to superior intercostal vessels would result. The final step would then involve fusion of these paired trunks in the median plane, a recognised phenomenon where a bridging structure exists10. This fascinating variant has revealed an absence of in-depth understanding of the behaviour of the intersegmental arteries and dorsal aortae during embryogenesis. The fact that this variant occurred in the presence of a segmentation anomaly within the somites may indicate an interaction with a cranio-caudal and lateralising mechanism that governs the establishment of the normal (and abnormal) vascular pattern.