Search

Identification and evaluation of long-term markers is crucial in prolonging the detection window for anabolic steroid abuse in sport. Recently, sulfoconjugated epiandrosterone was identified as a potential long-term marker for the abuse of certain endogenous anabolic agents, including testosterone, which continues to be widely used as a performance enhancing agent in sport. To evaluate the applicability of epiandrosterone sulfate as a marker for testosterone use, administration studies were conducted with multiple modes of testosterone administration - transdermal, intramuscular, and subcutaneous. A modified sample preparation method was used to collect both glucuronidated and sulfoconjugated analytes of interest. Carbon isotope ratio measurements from the administration studies are presented here. Epiandrosterone was less effective than the conventionally used target compounds for detection of the low dose application (transdermal gel). With intramuscular administration, epiandrosterone was more diagnostic than with transdermal administration, but it did not prolong the detection window more than the conventional target compounds. With subcutaneous administration, the doses administered to the subjects were varied and the effect on the epiandrosterone values was dependent on the magnitude of the dose administered. Epiandrosterone does not appear to be a useful marker in the detection of low dose testosterone administration. It is responsive to higher dose administration, but it does not provide an extension of the detection window relative to conventional target compounds., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Purpose: Fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is a novel formulation of insulin aspart containing two additional excipients: niacinamide, to increase early absorption, and L-arginine, to optimize stability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of niacinamide on insulin aspart absorption and to investigate the mechanism of action underlying the accelerated absorption., Methods: The impact of niacinamide was assessed in pharmacokinetic analyses in pigs and humans, small angle X-ray scattering experiments, trans-endothelial transport assays, vascular tension measurements, and subcutaneous blood flow imaging., Results: Niacinamide increased the rate of early insulin aspart absorption in pigs, and pharmacokinetic modelling revealed this effect to be most pronounced up to ~30-40 min after injection in humans. Niacinamide increased the relative monomer fraction of insulin aspart by ~35%, and the apparent permeability of insulin aspart across an endothelial cell barrier by ~27%. Niacinamide also induced a concentration-dependent vasorelaxation of porcine arteries, and increased skin perfusion in pigs., Conclusion: Niacinamide mediates the acceleration of initial insulin aspart absorption, and the mechanism of action appears to be multifaceted. Niacinamide increases the initial abundance of insulin aspart monomers and transport of insulin aspart after subcutaneous administration, and also mediates a transient, local vasodilatory effect.

Background: This study assessed subcutaneous absorption kinetics of rapid-acting insulin administered as a bolus using bolus delivery speeds commonly employed in commercially available insulin pumps (i.e., 2 and 40 s for delivering 1 insulin unit)., Materials and Methods: Twenty C-peptide-negative type 1 diabetic subjects were studied on two occasions, separated by at least 7 days, using the euglycemic clamp procedure. After an overnight fast, subjects were given, in random order, a subcutaneous insulin bolus (15 U of insulin lispro, Eli Lilly) either for 30 s using an Animas IR2020 pump (fast bolus delivery) or for 10 min using a Medtronic Minimed Paradigm 512 pump (slow bolus delivery)., Results: Fast bolus delivery resulted in an earlier onset of insulin action as compared with slow bolus delivery (21.0 ± 2.5 vs. 34.3 ± 2.7 min; P < 0.002). Furthermore, time to reach maximum insulin effect was found to be 27 min earlier with fast bolus delivery as compared with slow bolus delivery (98 ± 11 vs. 125 ± 16 min; P < 0.005). In addition, the area under the plasma insulin curve from 0 to 60 min for fast bolus delivery was greater than the one for slow bolus delivery (10,307 ± 1291 vs. 8192 ± 865 min·pmol/L; P = 0.027)., Conclusions: Results suggest that insulin bolus delivery with fast delivery speed may result in more rapid insulin absorption and, thus, may provide a better control of meal-related glucose excursions than that obtained with bolus delivery using slow delivery speeds. Our findings may have important implications for the future design of the bolus delivery unit of insulin pumps.

The lack of understanding on how to treat pancreas-related diseases and develop new therapeutics is partly due to the unavailability of appropriate models. In vitro models fail to provide a physiological environment. Testing new drug targets in these models can give rise to bias and misleading results. Therefore, we developed an in vivo model for drug testing on full pancreatic digests, which maintains the interactions between endo- and exocrine tissues and allows retrieving the samples for further analyses. The use of full pancreatic digest eliminates the need to isolate islets, reducing time and cost. In this model, four different conditions can be implanted subcutaneously within the same animal. Each condition consists of full pancreatic tissue digests embedded in alginate beads. All alginate beads in one animal contained full pancreatic digest of the same donor and, after 5-day implantation, were retrieved for analysis focusing on survival, function, and/or organization. Proof-of-principle of the platform was evidenced by showing the effect of hyaluronic acid and vascular endothelial growth factor on the overall function of the full pancreatic digest and on endothelial cells in the pancreatic digest, respectively. Retrieval from identical animals allows direct comparison between conditions. Metabolism (MTT) quantification, dithizone staining, and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion assessment allow to discriminate, using a minimal number of animals, between treatments and validate the system. Because of its simplicity, the model is highly adaptable to specific needs of the user.

Purpose: Palliative care patients often need sedation to alleviate intractable anxiety, stress, and pain. Dexmedetomidine is used for sedation of intensive care patients, but there is no prior information on its subcutaneous (SC) administration, a route that would be favored in palliative care. We compared the pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular, sympatholytic, and sedative effects of SC and intravenously (IV) administered dexmedetomidine in healthy volunteers., Methods: An open two-period, cross-over design with balanced randomization was used. Ten male subjects were randomized to receive 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine both IV and SC. Concentrations of dexmedetomidine and catecholamines in plasma were measured. Pharmacokinetic variables were calculated with non-compartmental methods. In addition, cardiovascular and sedative drug effects were monitored., Results: Eight subjects completed both treatment periods. Peak concentrations of dexmedetomidine were observed 15 min after SC administration (median; range 15-240). The mean bioavailability of SC dexmedetomidine was 81% (AUC 0-∞ ratio × 100%, range 49-97%). The mean (SD) peak concentration of dexmedetomidine in plasma was 0.3 (0.1) ng/ml, and plasma concentrations associated with sedative effects (i.e., > 0.2 ng/ml) were maintained for 4 h after SC dosing. Plasma noradrenaline concentrations were significantly lower (P < 0.001) within 3 h after IV than after SC administration. Subjective scores for vigilance and performance were significantly lower 0-60 min after IV than SC dosing (P < 0.001 for both). The onset of the cardiovascular, sympatholytic, and sedative effects of dexmedetomidine was clearly less abrupt after SC than IV administration., Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine is relatively rapidly and efficiently absorbed after SC administration. Subcutaneous dexmedetomidine may be a feasible alternative in palliative sedation, and causes attenuated cardiovascular effects compared to IV administration. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Identifier: NCT02724098 . EUDRA CT number 2015-004698-34 .

A subcutaneous risperidone implant (RI) formulation was developed to improve medication adherence in schizophrenia. Two phase 1 studies were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of RI in adult patients with schizophrenia. In study 1, all subjects were stable on 4 mg oral risperidone; subsequently, the first subject received 375 mg RI for 1 month, and the remaining subjects received 375 mg RI for 3 months. In study 2, all subjects were stable on oral risperidone 4 mg, 6 mg, or 8 mg and subsequently received RI 480 mg, 720 mg, or 960 mg, respectively, for 6 months. Blood samples were collected at prespecified time points. Various pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in both studies. In both studies risperidone total active moiety plasma concentrations following RI increased slowly, reached therapeutic levels within approximately 2 days, and remained relatively stable. In study 1, the average concentration for RI was 81.3% of the oral trough concentration and 27.5% of the oral peak concentration. In study 2, the steady-state concentration for RI was comparable to the oral trough concentration of the corresponding dose. Patient disease status remained stable with no major safety issues. RI may represent an alternative formulation for schizophrenia treatment with a lower peak-to-trough plasma drug ratio than oral risperidone., (© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)