Search

There is a conventional belief that prosocial behaviors cannot arise through selfish human nature, because defection always exploits cooperation to achieve a higher payoff at an individual level. Unyieldingly, some people hope to move society to cooperation through their zealous cooperation, regardless of payoffs. From the perspective of spatial evolutionary games, however, such zealous behavior is unnecessary because cooperation can emerge from selfish human nature by aggregating in evolution. Yet, to what extent can zealous cooperation induce others to cooperate? We assume a fraction of zealous agents in spatial public goods games who always cooperate. The results show that a moderate proportion of these zealous cooperators can diminish the cooperation level in the system, and cooperation is only promoted when zealots are many. Regarding spatial behaviors, the areas of zealous cooperation in a medium density can prevent evolutionary cooperation from passing through and aggregating. The phenomenon of zealous cooperation impeding cooperation becomes more pronounced when agents become less random and more selfish. This is because dotted zealous cooperation provides significant payoffs to neighboring defection, making them more solid in fitness. In this way, we also find that when zealous cooperators have low productivity, the neighbors receive fewer benefits by exploitation, thus allowing cooperation to spread. We also study replicator dynamics in unstructured populations where zealous cooperation always promotes cooperation, agreeing that zealous cooperation hindering cooperation is a spatial effect., (© 2023 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.)

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of the cannula under laparoscopy, percutaneous puncture cannula, and conventional surgery cannula for peritoneal dialysis., Methods: From May 3, 2015 to February 14, 2020, 87 patients with end-stage renal disease needing peritoneal dialysis in Ningbo Zhenhai People's Hospital were enrolled. These patients were divided into three groups including cannula under laparoscopy (23 cases), percutaneous puncture cannula (29 cases), and conventional surgery cannula (35 cases). The baseline characteristics, perioperative conditions (surgical time, post-surgical hospitalization time), the incidence of recent complications (abdominal hemorrhage, direct abdominal hemorrhage, incision pain, leakage, catheter shift, peritonitis), and long-term complications (catheter shift, peritonitis, hernia, thoracic and abdominal fistula, abdominal tube obstruction) among the three groups were compared., Results: Compared with the group of conventional surgery cannula, the operation time in the group of cannula under laparoscopy and the group of percutaneous puncture cannula were significantly shorter (minutes: 32.5±12.3, 28.9±11.8 vs. 61.3±15.4, both P < 0.05), the in-hospital stay in the group of cannula under laparoscopy and the group of percutaneous puncture cannula were reduced (days: 9.8±3.4, 9.2±2.6 vs. 10.7±3.2), but there was no statistical significance among the three groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of abdominal bleeding, rectus abdominis bleeding, and incision pain in the group of cannula under laparoscopy and the group of percutaneous puncture cannula were significantly lower than those in the group of conventional surgery cannula [incidence of abdominal bleeding: 4.3% (1/23), 3.4% (1/29) vs. 22.9% (8/35), incidence of rectus abdominis bleeding: 4.3% (1/23), 3.4% (1/29) vs. 22.9% (8/35), incidence of incision pain: 8.7% (2/23), 10.3% (3/29) vs. 42.9% (15/35), all P < 0.01]. The difference between the group of cannula under laparoscopy and the group of percutaneous puncture cannula had no statistical significance. Compared with the group of conventional surgery cannula and the group of percutaneous puncture cannula, the incidence of catheter displacement in the group of cannula under laparoscopy was significantly reduced [4.3% (1/23) vs. 27.6% (8/29), 31.4% (11/35), both P < 0.05]. Compared with the group of conventional surgery cannula and the group of percutaneous puncture cannula, the incidence of catheter displacement in long-term complications in the group of cannula under laparoscopy was significantly reduced [4.3% (1/23) vs. 24.1% (7/29), 31.4% (11/35), both P < 0.05], however, the difference of that between the group of conventional surgery cannula and the group of percutaneous puncture cannula was not statistically significant. The incidence of hernia in the group of cannula under laparoscopy was significantly higher than that in the group of percutaneous puncture cannula or in the group of conventional surgery cannula [21.7% (5/23) vs. 3.4% (1/29), 2.8% (1/35), both P < 0.05], and all of that were umbilical hernia, however, the difference of that between the group of percutaneous puncture cannula and the group of conventional surgery cannula was not statistically significant., Conclusions: Compared with the traditional conventional surgical cannula placement methods, percutaneous puncture has the advantages of simple operation, short operation time, small trauma, but still cannot reduce the incidence of drift tube; laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis tube has the advantages of short operation time, small trauma and low catheter displacement rate, but increases the risk of umbilical hernia.