Search

Idiopathic blepharospasm is a clinically heterogeneous dystonia also characterized by non motor symptoms.We used a k-means cluster analysis to assess 188 patients with idiopathic blepharospasm in order to identify relatively homogeneous subpopulations of patients, using a set of motor and psychiatric variables to generate the cluster solution.Blepharospasm patients reached higher scores on scales assessing depressive- and anxiety-related disorders than healthy/disease controls. Cluster analysis suggested the existence of three groups of patients that differed by type of spasms, overall motor severity, and presence/severity of psychiatric problems. The greater severity of motor symptoms was observed in Group 1, the least severity in Group 3, while the severity of blepharospasm in Group 2 was between that observed in Groups 1 and 3. The three motor subtypes also differed by psychiatric features: the lowest severity of psychiatric symptoms was observed in the group with least severe motor symptoms (group 3), while the highest psychiatric severity scores were observed in group 2 that carried intermediate motor severity rather than in the group with more severe motor symptoms (group 1). The three groups did not differ by disease duration, age of onset, sex or other clinical features.The present study suggests that blepharospasm patients may be classified in different subtypes according to the type of spasms, overall motor severity and presence/severity of depressive symptoms and anxiety.

The reliability of the Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) using teleneurology has not been assessed.To test whether removing items inadequately assessed by video would impact measurement of PSP severity and progression.We performed secondary analyses of two data sets: the phase 2/3 trial of Davunetide in PSP and a large single-center cohort. We examined two modifications of the PSPRS: (1) removing neck rigidity, limb rigidity, and postural stability (25 items; mPSPRS-25) and (2) also removing three ocular motor items and limb dystonia (21 items; mPSPRS-21). Proportional agreement relative to the possible total scores was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient, compared to the original PSPRS baseline values and change over 6 and 12 months. We examined the ability of both scales to predict survival in the single-center cohort using proportional hazards models.The mPSPRS-25 showed excellent agreement (0.99; P 0.001) with the original PSPRS at baseline, 0.98 (P 0.001) agreement in measuring change over 6 months, and 0.98 (P 0.001) over 12 months. The mPSPRS-21 showed agreement of 0.94 (P 0.001) with the original PSPRS at baseline, 0.92 (P 0.001) at 6 months, and 0.95 (P 0.001) at 12 months. Baseline and 6-month change in both modified scales were highly predictive of survival in the single-center cohort.Modified versions of the PSPRS which can be administered remotely show excellent agreement with the original scale and predict survival in PSP. The mPSPRS-21 should facilitate clinical care and research in PSP via teleneurology. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) and healthy adults demonstrate similar levels of visuomotor adaptation provided that the distortion is small or introduced gradually, and hence, implicit processes are engaged. Recently, implicit processes underlying visuomotor adaptation in healthy individuals have been proposed to include proprioceptive recalibration (i.e., shifts in one's proprioceptive sense of felt hand position to match the visual estimate of their hand experienced during reaches with altered visual feedback of the hand). In the current study, we asked if proprioceptive recalibration is preserved in PD patients. PD patients tested during their "off" and "on" medication states and age-matched healthy controls reached to visual targets, while visual feedback of their unseen hand was gradually rotated 30° clockwise or translated 4 cm rightwards of their actual hand trajectory. As expected, PD patients and controls produced significant reach aftereffects, indicating visuomotor adaptation after reaching with the gradually introduced visuomotor distortions. More importantly, following visuomotor adaptation, both patients and controls showed recalibration in hand position estimates, and the magnitude of this recalibration was comparable between PD patients and controls. No differences for any measures assessed were observed across medication status (i.e., PD off vs PD on). Results reveal that patients are able to adjust their sensorimotor mappings and recalibrate proprioception following adaptation to a gradually introduced visuomotor distortion, and that dopaminergic intervention does not affect this proprioceptive recalibration. These results suggest that proprioceptive recalibration does not involve striatal dopaminergic pathways and may contribute to the preserved visuomotor adaptation that arises implicitly in PD patients.

Motor symptoms are a core feature of Parkinson's disease (PD) and cause a significant burden on patients' quality of life. Oral levodopa is still the most effective treatment, however, the motor benefits are countered by inherent pharmacologic limitations of the drug. Additionally, with disease progression, chronic levodopa leads to the appearance of motor complications including motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Furthermore, several motor abnormalities of posture, balance, and gait may become less responsive to levodopa. With these unmet needs and our evolving understanding of the neuroanatomic and pathophysiologic underpinnings of PD, several advances have been made in defining new therapies for motor symptoms. These include newer levodopa formulations and drug delivery systems, refinements in adjunctive medications, and non-dopaminergic treatment strategies. Although some are in early stages of development, these novel treatments potentially widen the available options for the management of motor symptoms allowing clinicians to provide an individually tailored care for PD patients. Here, we review the existing and emerging interventions for PD with focus on newly approved and investigational drugs for motor symptoms, motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, and balance and gait dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Periodic limb movements while awake (PLMA) are similar to Periodic limb movements in sleep (PLMS) but occurring during wakefulness and seen in association with restless leg syndrome (RLS). OBJECTIVES: To describe PLMA as a wearing‐off phenomenon in Parkinson's Disease (PD). METHODS: We describe four individuals with PD and PLMS, who had associated similar periodic and stereotypic lower extremity movements during wakefulness, thought to be secondary to PLMA, and were highly responsive to dopaminergic treatment. RESULTS: Despite the prevalence of RLS and PLMS in individuals with PD, the presence of similar movements during wakefulness has not been well characterized. The lack of a specific diagnostic criteria poses a significant diagnostic challenge. CONCLUSIONS: We describe, for the first time to our knowledge, PLMA as a wearing‐off phenomenon in PD. This entity could be classified in the spectrum of “low‐dose dyskinesia,” as we found that it was highly responsive to dopaminergic treatment.

Introduction The efficacy and safety of apomorphine sublingual film (APL-130277; APL) for the on-demand treatment of “OFF” episodes associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) was demonstrated in a double-blind trial. Herein we describe the ability of patients to receive effective and tolerable APL dose titration during the open-label titration phase. Methods Adult patients with levodopa-responsive PD and “OFF” episodes were enrolled. In practically defined “OFF,” patients were observed for a FULL “ON” after their usual morning carbidopa/levodopa (CD/LD) dose and then after titration with APL following each increasing dose (10–35 mg). Antiemetic medication was administered for 3 days before initiation of titration and was continued throughout titration. Motor responses were evaluated predose and postdose using Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III score. Safety outcomes were evaluated. Results Among 141 patients who enrolled in the study and received APL during open-label titration, 109 (77.3%) achieved a FULL “ON” (66.1% at 10–20 mg) and 10 did not. Patients who successfully completed APL dose titration tended to be younger, had a longer mean time since PD diagnosis, and had lower levodopa requirements than those who discontinued during titration for any reason. Change in MDS-UPDRS Part III scores from predose to 30 min postdose after titration with the effective dose of APL (n = 109) was similar across all dose groups. In a post hoc analysis, the magnitude of motor response with APL was ~2-fold higher than with CD/LD 15 min postdose, and the observed peak response occurred earlier with APL than with the trend seen for CD/LD (45 vs 90 min, respectively). Overall, the most common (≥10%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during APL dose titration were nausea (20.6%), yawning (12.1%), dizziness (11.3%), and somnolence (11.3%). Twelve patients discontinued due to TEAEs during APL dose titration, most commonly (≥2%) because of dizziness (2.8%), nausea (2.1%), and somnolence (2.1%). Conclusion Among eligible patients with PD and “OFF” episodes who had their APL dose successfully titrated to an effective and tolerable level, most were able to do so within the first 3 titrated doses but some required further dose escalations. The use of APL can provide benefit for the treatment of “OFF” episodes.

Background: In clinical trials that recruited patients with early Parkinson’s disease (PD), 4–15% of the participants with a clinical diagnosis of PD had normal dopamine transporter single photon emission computed tomography (DAT SPECT) scans, also called “scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit” (SWEDD). Objective: To investigate in patients with a clinical diagnosis of PD, if specific clinical features are useful to distinguish patients with nigrostriatal degeneration from those that have no nigrostriatal degeneration. Methods: We performed a diagnostic test accuracy study. Patients that participated in the Levodopa in Early Parkinson’s disease trial, a clinical trial in patients with early PD, were asked to participate if they had not undergone DAT SPECT imaging earlier. The index tests were specific clinical features that were videotaped. A panel of six neurologists in training (NT), six general neurologists (GN), and six movement disorders experts (MDE) received a batch of ten videos consisting of all SWEDD subjects and a random sample of patients with abnormal DAT SPECT scans. The raters analyzed the videos for presence of specific signs and if they suspected the patient to have SWEDD. The reference test was visually assessed DAT SPECT imaging. Results: Of a total of 87 participants, three subjects were SWEDDs (3.4%). The overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the Parkinsonian signs was poor to moderate with ICCs ranging from 0.14 to 0.67. NT correctly identified 50.0% of the SWEDD subjects, GN 33.3%, and MDE 66.7%. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the selected videotaped clinical features cannot reliably distinguish patients with a clinical diagnosis of PD and an abnormal DAT SPECT from patients with clinical PD and a SWEDD.

Background Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection has been associated with worse motor function in Parkinson's disease (PD). Objective We aimed to evaluate the effects of HP eradication on PD symptoms. Methods In this parallel-group, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled, single-center trial, patients with PD with positive HP urea breath test and serology were block randomized (1:1) to receive standard eradication triple therapy or identically appearing placebo capsules for 1 week. Prespecified motor (International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Unified PD Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS], timed tests, and home-based wearable sensor measurements), nonmotor (Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire and Montreal Cognitive Assessment), and quality-of-life (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39) outcome measures were assessed at weeks 6, 12, 24, and 52. The primary outcome was the baseline-to-week 12 change in ON medication MDS-UPDRS motor scores. Lactulose-hydrogen breath testing for concomitant small intestinal bacterial overgrowth was performed at baseline and repeated at week 24, together with the urea breath test. Results A total of 310 patients were screened for eligibility and 80 were randomly assigned, of whom 67 were included in the full-analysis set (32 treatment group patients, 35 placebo patients). HP eradication did not improve MDS-UPDRS motor scores at week 12 (mean difference 2.6 points in favor of placebo, 95% confidence interval: -0.4 to 5.6, P = 0.089). There was no significant improvement in any motor, nonmotor, or quality-of-life outcome at weeks 12 and 52. Both the full-analysis and per-protocol analyses (based on eradication status) supported these conclusions. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth status did not influence treatment results. Conclusions HP eradication does not improve clinical outcomes in PD, suggesting that there is no justification for routine HP screening or eradication with the goal of improving PD symptoms. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Background Long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) with l -DOPA typically leads to development of l -DOPA induced dyskinesia (LID). Amantadine, an NMDA antagonist, attenuates LID, but with limited efficacy and considerable side-effects. NLX-112 (also known as befiradol or F13640), a highly selective and efficacious 5-HT1A receptor agonist, reduced LID when tested in rodent and marmoset models of PD. Methods The effects of NLX-112 (0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg PO) on established LID evoked by acute challenge with l -DOPA (27.5 ± 3.8 mg/kg PO) were assessed in MPTP-treated cynomolgus macaques. Amantadine (10 mg/kg PO) was tested as a positive control. Plasma exposure of NLX-112 (0.1 mg/kg PO) was determined. Results NLX-112 significantly and dose-dependently reduced median LID levels by up to 96% during the first hour post-administration (0.3 mg/kg). Moreover, NLX-112 reduced the duration of ‘bad on-time’ associated with disabling LID by up to 48% (0.3 mg/kg). In contrast, NLX-112 had negligible impact on the anti-parkinsonian benefit of l -DOPA. NLX-112 exposure peaked at ~50 ng/ml at 30 min post-administration but decreased to ~15 ng/ml at 2h. Amantadine reduced by 42% ‘bad on-time’ associated with l -DOPA, thereby validating the model. Conclusion These data show that, in MPTP-lesioned cynomolgus macaques, NLX-112 exerts robust anti-dyskinetic effects, without reducing the anti-parkinsonian benefit of l -DOPA. These observations complement previous findings and suggest that selective and high efficacy activation of 5-HT1A receptors by NLX-112 may constitute a promising approach to combat LID in PD, providing an alternative for patients in whom amantadine is poorly tolerated or without useful effect.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the 12-week efficacy and safety of oral glycopyrrolate for moderate-to-severe sialorrhea in Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND Chronic moderate-to-severe sialorrhea has a negative impact on quality of life in PD. There is no robust evidence for oral treatments for sialorrhea longer than 1 week. METHODS This was a 12-week, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel phase II study in patients with PD and Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale item 2.2 > 2. The intervention was glycopyrrolate up to 4.5 mg/d; the primary outcome was sialorrhea related-disability (Radboud Oral Motor Inventory for Parkinson's Disease-Saliva). We used an intention-to-treat analysis. A P

Debate is ongoing regarding when, why, and how to initiate pharmacotherapy for Parkinson's disease. Early initiation of dopaminergic therapies does not convey disease-modifying effects but does reduce disability. Concerns about the development of motor complications arising from the early initiation of levodopa, which led to misconceived levodopa-sparing strategies, have been largely mitigated by the outcomes of the PD MED and Levodopa in Early Parkinson's Disease (LEAP) studies. The LEAP study also showed the potential for early improvement in quality of life, even when disability is negligible. Until more effective methods of providing stable dopamine concentrations are developed, current evidence supports the use of levodopa as initial symptomatic treatment in most patients with Parkinson's disease, starting with low doses and titrating to therapeutic threshold. Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors and dopamine agonists can be reserved as potential adjunct treatments later in the disease course. Future research will need to establish effective disease-modifying treatments, address whether patients' quality of life is substantially improved with early initiation of treatment rather than a wait and watch strategy, and establish whether new levodopa formulations will delay onset of dyskinesia.

Psychotic and compulsive symptoms in Parkinson disease are highly prevalent and associated with poor outcomes and greater caregiver burden. When acute, delirium should be ruled out or treated accordingly. When chronic, comorbid systemic illnesses, dementia, and psychiatric disorders should be considered. Reduction and discontinuation of anticholinergics, amantadine, dopamine agonists, and levodopa as tolerated, as well as adjunctive clozapine or quetiapine are frequently effective to manage Parkinson disease psychosis. Pimavanserin appears effective but is not widely available, and more experience is needed. Dopamine agonist discontinuation is usually successful for impulse control disorders, but requires frequent monitoring, documentation, and caregiver involvement.

Several scales have been proposed to clinically evaluate the Motor Severity of Blepharospasm (BSP) but information about their measurement properties as a multicenter instrument is limited.To compare the measurement properties of four clinical scales in rating the severity of BSP in a large sample of patients from multiple sites.The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Scale (BFMS), the Global Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (GDRS), the Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS), and the Blepharospasm Severity Rating Scale (BSRS) were administered to 211 patients across 10 sites who were also requested to self-complete the Blepharospasm Disability Index (BDI). Measurement properties to be assessed included inter-/intra-observer agreement, item-to-total correlation, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effect, convergent/discriminant validity, and adherence to the distribution of BDI.The BFMS had unsatisfactory measurement properties, the GDRS had acceptable reliability but other properties could not be completely testable; the JRS had satisfactory measurement properties but the scale did not accurately reflect the distribution of disability parameter (BDI) in the sample, and the BSRS had satisfactory measurement properties and also showed the best adherence to the distribution of BDI in the assessed sample.The comparison of the measurement properties of four rating scales to assess the motor state of the BSP in a large sample of patients from multiple sites showed that the GDRS should be used to simultaneously assess BSP and dystonia in other body parts, while the JRS (easier to use) and BSRS (better to discriminate severity) should be used to assess BSP alone.

BACKGROUND: The reliability of the Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) using teleneurology has not been assessed. OBJECTIVES: To test whether removing items inadequately assessed by video would impact measurement of PSP severity and progression. METHODS: We performed secondary analyses of two data sets: the phase 2/3 trial of Davunetide in PSP and a large single-center cohort. We examined two modifications of the PSPRS: (1) removing neck rigidity, limb rigidity, and postural stability (25 items; mPSPRS-25) and (2) also removing three ocular motor items and limb dystonia (21 items; mPSPRS-21). Proportional agreement relative to the possible total scores was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient, compared to the original PSPRS baseline values and change over 6 and 12 months. We examined the ability of both scales to predict survival in the single-center cohort using proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The mPSPRS-25 showed excellent agreement (0.99; P < 0.001) with the original PSPRS at baseline, 0.98 (P < 0.001) agreement in measuring change over 6 months, and 0.98 (P < 0.001) over 12 months. The mPSPRS-21 showed agreement of 0.94 (P < 0.001) with the original PSPRS at baseline, 0.92 (P < 0.001) at 6 months, and 0.95 (P < 0.001) at 12 months. Baseline and 6-month change in both modified scales were highly predictive of survival in the single-center cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Modified versions of the PSPRS which can be administered remotely show excellent agreement with the original scale and predict survival in PSP. The mPSPRS-21 should facilitate clinical care and research in PSP via teleneurology.

Background There are no widely accepted criteria to aid the physician in diagnosing BSP. Objective To validate recently proposed diagnostic criteria for blepharospasm in a larger and geographically diverse population and to develop a screening system for blepharospasm. Methods Video-recordings from 211 blepharospasm patients and 166 healthy/disease controls were examined by 8 raters. Agreement for presence of orbicularis oculi spasms, sensory trick, and increased blinking was measured by k statistics. Inability to voluntarily suppress the spasms was asked by the examiner but not captured in the video. Patients/controls were also requested to fill a self-administered questionnaire addressing relevant blepharospasm clinical aspects. The diagnosis at each site was the gold standard for sensitivity/specificity. Results All the study items yielded satisfactory inter/intra-observer agreement. Combination of items rather than each item alone reached satisfactory sensitivity/specificity. The combined algorithm started with recognition of spasms followed by sensory trick. In the absence of a sensory trick, including “increased blinking” or “inability to voluntarily suppress the spasms” or both items yielded 88–92% sensitivity and 79–83% specificity. No single question of the questionnaire yielded high sensitivity/specificity. Serial application of the questionnaire to our blepharospasm and control subjects and subsequent clinical examination of subjects screening positive by the validated diagnostic algorithms yielded 78–81% sensitivity and 83–91% specificity. Conclusion These results support the use of proposed diagnostic criteria in multi-ethnic, multi-center cohorts. We also propose a case-finding procedure to screen blepharospasm in a given population with less effort than would be required by examination of all subjects.

Background and purpose\ud Several clinical and demographic factors relate to anatomic spread of adult-onset isolated dystonia, but a predictive model is still lacking. The aims of this study were: (i) to develop and validate a predictive model of anatomic spread of adult-onset isolated dystonia; and (ii) to evaluate whether presence of tremor associated with dystonia influences model predictions of spread.\ud \ud Methods\ud Adult-onset isolated dystonia participants with focal onset from the Dystonia Coalition Natural History Project database were included. We developed two prediction models, one with dystonia as sole disease manifestation (“dystonia-only”) and one accepting dystonia OR tremor in any body part as disease manifestations (“dystonia OR tremor”). Demographic and clinical predictors were selected based on previous evidence, clinical plausibility of association with spread, or both. We used logistic regressions and evaluated model discrimination and calibration. Internal validation was carried out based on bootstrapping.\ud \ud Results\ud Both predictive models showed an area under the curve of 0.65 (95% confidence intervals 0.62–0.70 and 0.62–0.69, respectively) and good calibration after internal validation. In both models, onset of dystonia in body regions other than the neck, older age, depression and history of neck trauma were predictors of spread.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud This predictive modeling of spread in adult-onset isolated dystonia based on accessible predictors (demographic and clinical) can be easily implemented to inform individuals’ risk of spread. Because tremor did not influence prediction of spread, our results support the argument that tremor is a part of the dystonia syndrome, and not an independent or coincidental disorder.

[See related article at [www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.191089][2]][2] KEY POINTS Parkinson disease is chronic and progressive in nature, decreasing the quality of life for both patients with the disease and their caregivers and placing an onerous economic burden on society.[1][2] The first

Introduction To explore the prevalence, clinical course and associated features of lower limb tremor in the most common tremor syndromes. Methods This retrospective chart review studied lower limb tremor patients as defined by a Tremor Rating Scale score ≥1 in either lower limb. We compared and correlated their characteristics, also comparing them with patients without lower limb tremor. Results Of the 283 patients with lower limb tremor (58.3% males, age: 65.0 ± 16.0 years, tremor duration: 25.6 ± 17.9 years), 255 patients within six tremor syndrome groups were included in the final analysis. Prevalence of patients with lower limb tremor (either rest, postural or kinetic) was lowest (28.6%) in the essential tremor (ET) group and highest (69%) in the parkinsonian tremor (PT) group. Lower limb tremor score was higher in patients classified as having intention tremor (IT) compared to ET and dystonic tremor (DT). Total tremor score was highest in IT and lowest in ET. We found a positive correlation between total lower limb tremor score and total tremor score in most groups. In addition, there was a positive correlation between lower limb tremor score and upper limb tremor score. Finally, compared to patients without lower limb tremor, all diagnostic groups with lower limb tremor, with the exception of functional tremor (FT), had worse total tremor score; and disease duration was longer in ET-plus, DT and PT patients with lower limb tremor compared to those without. Conclusions Lower limb tremor is less commonly observed in ET than other tremor syndromes, is a marker of symptom severity of the underlying disease condition in all tremor syndromes except FT, and reflects longer disease duration in ET-plus, DT and PT.

Treatment strategies for dystonia depend on the focal, segmental or generalized distribution of symptoms. Chemodenervation with botulinum toxin remains the treatment of choice for focal- or select-body regions in generalized and segmental dystonia. A potentially longer acting formulation of botulinum toxin is being investigated besides the currently available formulations. Electromyography increases toxin injection accuracy and may reduce injection number, frequency, side effects and costs by identifying dystonic muscle activity. Oral anticholinergics, baclofen and clonazepam are used off-label, but novel drugs in development include sodium oxybate, zonisamide and perampanel. Characterizing dystonia as a sensorimotor circuit disorder has prompted the use of noninvasive neuromodulation procedures. These techniques need further study but simultaneous rehabilitation techniques appear to also improve outcomes. Pallidal deep-brain stimulation is beneficial for medication-refractory primary generalized and possibly focal dystonia such as cervical dystonia. Certain genetic conditions are amenable to specific therapies and future gene-targeted therapies could benefit selected dystonia patients.

In this review, we discuss the opportunity for repurposing drugs for use in l -DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID) in Parkinson's disease. LID is a particularly suitable indication for drug repurposing given its pharmacological diversity, translatability of animal-models, availability of Phase II proof-of-concept (PoC) methodologies and the indication-specific regulatory environment. A compound fit for repurposing is defined as one with appropriate human safety-data as well as animal safety, toxicology and pharmacokinetic data as found in an Investigational New Drug (IND) package for another indication. We first focus on how such repurposing candidates can be identified and then discuss development strategies that might progress such a candidate towards a Phase II clinical PoC. We discuss traditional means for identifying repurposing candidates and contrast these with newer approaches, especially focussing on the use of computational and artificial intelligence (AI) platforms. We discuss strategies that can be categorised broadly as: in vivo phenotypic screening in a hypothesis-free manner; in vivo phenotypic screening based on analogy to a related disorder; hypothesis-driven evaluation of candidates in vivo and in silico screening with a hypothesis-agnostic component to the selection. To highlight the power of AI approaches, we describe a case study using IBM Watson where a training set of compounds, with demonstrated ability to reduce LID, were employed to identify novel repurposing candidates. Using the approaches discussed, many diverse candidates for repurposing in LID, originally envisaged for other indications, will be described that have already been evaluated for efficacy in non-human primate models of LID and/or clinically. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled ‘Drug Repurposing: old molecules, new ways to fast track drug discovery and development for CNS disorders’.

BACKGROUND Several monogenic causes for isolated dystonia have been identified, but they collectively account for only a small proportion of cases. Two genome-wide association studies have reported a few potential dystonia risk loci; but conclusions have been limited by small sample sizes, partial coverage of genetic variants, or poor reproducibility. OBJECTIVE To identify robust genetic variants and loci in a large multicenter cervical dystonia cohort using a genome-wide approach. METHODS We performed a genome-wide association study using cervical dystonia samples from the Dystonia Coalition. Logistic and linear regressions, including age, sex, and population structure as covariates, were employed to assess variant- and gene-based genetic associations with disease status and age at onset. We also performed a replication study for an identified genome-wide significant signal. RESULTS After quality control, 919 cervical dystonia patients compared with 1491 controls of European ancestry were included in the analyses. We identified one genome-wide significant variant (rs2219975, chromosome 3, upstream of COL8A1, P-value 3.04 × 10-8 ). The association was not replicated in a newly genotyped sample of 473 cervical dystonia cases and 481 controls. Gene-based analysis identified DENND1A to be significantly associated with cervical dystonia (P-value 1.23 × 10-6 ). One low-frequency variant was associated with lower age-at-onset (16.4 ± 2.9 years, P-value = 3.07 × 10-8 , minor allele frequency = 0.01), located within the GABBR2 gene on chromosome 9 (rs147331823). CONCLUSION The genetic underpinnings of cervical dystonia are complex and likely consist of multiple distinct variants of small effect sizes. Larger sample sizes may be needed to provide sufficient statistical power to address the presumably multi-genic etiology of cervical dystonia. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Background: Non‐motor symptoms are well established phenotypic components of adult‐onset idiopathic, isolated, focal cervical dystonia (AOIFCD). However, improved understanding of their clinical heterogeneity is needed to better target therapeutic intervention. Here, we examine non‐motor phenotypic features to identify possible AOIFCD subgroups. Methods: Participants diagnosed with AOIFCD were recruited via specialist neurology clinics (dystonia wales: n = 114, dystonia coalition: n = 183). Non‐motor assessment included psychiatric symptoms, pain, sleep disturbance, and quality of life, assessed using self‐completed questionnaires or face‐to‐face assessment. Both cohorts were analyzed independently using Cluster, and Bayesian multiple mixed model phenotype analyses to investigate the relationship between non‐motor symptoms and determine evidence of phenotypic subgroups. Results: Independent cluster analysis of the two cohorts suggests two predominant phenotypic subgroups, one consisting of approximately a third of participants in both cohorts, experiencing increased levels of depression, anxiety, sleep impairment, and pain catastrophizing, as well as, decreased quality of life. The Bayesian approach reinforced this with the primary axis, which explained the majority of the variance, in each cohort being associated with psychiatric symptomology, and also sleep impairment and pain catastrophizing in the Dystonia Wales cohort. Conclusions: Non‐motor symptoms accompanying AOIFCD parse into two predominant phenotypic sub‐groups, with differences in psychiatric symptoms, pain catastrophizing, sleep quality, and quality of life. Improved understanding of these symptom groups will enable better targeted pathophysiological investigation and future therapeutic intervention., We demonstrate that individuals with adult‐onset idiopathic, isolated, focal cervical dystonia parse into two subgroups dependent on their non‐motor symptoms. Approximately a third of participants showed increased levels of depression, anxiety, sleep impairment and pain catastrophising, as well as decreased quality of life, indicating that improved understanding of these symptom groups will lead to better targeted treatment plans.

Background Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common focal isolated dystonia. Preclinical studies report that AMPA-selective glutamate receptor antagonists improve dystonia. Perampanel is a clinically available, AMPA receptor antagonist that has shown efficacy and safety in epilepsy. Objectives To determine safety and tolerability of perampanel in CD. Methods We performed a phase 2a, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate tolerability and safety of perampanel in CD. Included subjects had primary CD; those on botulinum toxin were 8 weeks post last injection. All subjects received perampanel 2 mg/day, titrated 2 mg weekly over 6 weeks, to maximum 12 mg/day; maintenance phase was 4 weeks, ending at week 10. Primary endpoints included tolerability, defined as ability to remain on perampanel for the maintenance period, at any dose level and safety, determined from adverse events (AEs) collected at each visit. Secondary exploratory endpoints included Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), quality of life (cervical dystonia impact profile [CIDP]-58) and Clinical Global Impression of change (CGI). Results CD participants (n = 25) were recruited. Eight subjects withdrew; 4 because of AEs, 3 for other reasons and 1 lost to follow up. One subject tolerated 12 mg/day. Eight subjects (30.8%) tolerated 2 mg, whereas 19.2% tolerated 4 mg/day, and 15.4% tolerated 6 mg or 8 mg/day. All subjects experienced AEs. The most common AEs were dizziness, imbalance, and irritability. Exploratory endpoints of TWSTRS showed some improved pain scores and CIDP-58 improved sleep. Conclusions Tolerability to perampanel was variable in CD subjects. Lower doses would be considered for future studies in this population.

Glutamatergic, noradrenergic, serotonergic, and cholinergic systems play a critical role in the basal ganglia circuitry. Targeting these non-dopaminergic receptors remains a focus of ongoing research to improve Parkinson's disease (PD) motor symptoms, without the potential side effects of dopamine replacement therapy. This review updates advancements in non-dopaminergic treatments for motor control in PD since 2013. To date, no non-dopaminergic selective drug has shown significant long-term efficacy as monotherapy in PD. The largest area of development in non-dopaminergic targets has been for motor complications of dopamine replacement therapy (motor fluctuations and dyskinesia). For treatment of motor fluctuations, safinamide, zonisamide, and istradefylline are currently approved, and novel glutamatergic and serotonergic drugs are in development. Long-acting formulations of amantadine are approved for treating dyskinesia. Several non-dopaminergic drugs have failed to show anti-dyskinetic efficacy, while some are still in development. Non-dopaminergic targets are also being pursued to treat specific motor symptoms of PD. For example, CX-8998 (a calcium channel modulator) is being evaluated for PD tremor and rivastigmine may improve gait dysfunction in PD. Drug repurposing continues to be a key strategy for non-dopaminergic targets in PD, but the field needs to increase discovery and availability of such drugs.

Prolonged treatment with L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) leads to the development of uncontrolled movements (L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias (LID)) in Parkinson's disease (PD). There is currently only a single approved drug for the treatment of LID, a long-acting preparation of the NMDA antagonist, amantadine, that has variable benefits and side-effects. Therefore, new treatments for LID remain an unmet in PD.We review the current strategies for the management of LID; the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the development of LID, which provides the rationale for clinical trials of novel targets for LID and provide a review of phase II/III trials for emerging drugs for LID, with either positive results, or ongoing studies, reported between January 2014 and December 2019.There are several ongoing studies for agents that showed possible benefit at phase Ib/IIa for reducing LID. However, there are no new positive phase III double-blind randomized controlled clinical trials (DBRCT) for emerging treatments for LID. Generating better preclinical models, more precise recruitment tools and better outcome measures remain a priority. The pharmacology of drugs investigated for LID may be too selective; therefore, evaluating combinations of drugs is worthy of consideration as is the repurposing of existing drugs with multiple pharmacological targets.

Objective To update evidence‐based medicine recommendations for treating nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). Background The International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Evidence‐Based Medicine Committee's recommendations for treatments of PD were first published in 2002, updated in 2011, and now updated again through December 31, 2016. Methods Level I studies testing pharmacological, surgical, or nonpharmacological interventions for the treatment of nonmotor symptoms in PD were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion and quality scoring were as previously reported. The disorders covered were a range of neuropsychiatric symptoms, autonomic dysfunction, disorders of sleep and wakefulness, pain, fatigue, impaired olfaction, and ophthalmologic dysfunction. Clinical efficacy, implications for clinical practice, and safety conclusions are reported. Results A total of 37 new studies qualified for review. There were no randomized controlled trials that met inclusion criteria for the treatment of anxiety disorders, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, excessive sweating, impaired olfaction, or ophthalmologic dysfunction. We identified clinically useful or possibly useful interventions for the treatment of depression, apathy, impulse control and related disorders, dementia, psychosis, insomnia, daytime sleepiness, drooling, orthostatic hypotension, gastrointestinal dysfunction, urinary dysfunction, erectile dysfunction, fatigue, and pain. There were no clinically useful interventions identified to treat non‐dementia‐level cognitive impairment. Conclusions The evidence base for treating a range of nonmotor symptoms in PD has grown substantially in recent years. However, treatment options overall remain limited given the high prevalence and adverse impact of these disorders, so the development and testing of new treatments for nonmotor symptoms in PD remains a top priority. © 2019 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

ObjectiveTo assess the clinical manifestations and predictors of different types of tremors in individuals with different types of isolated dystonia.MethodsClinical manifestations of tremor were assessed in a multicenter, international cross-sectional, cohort study of 2,362 individuals with all types of isolated dystonia (focal, segmental, multifocal, and generalized) recruited through the Dystonia Coalition.ResultsMethodical and standardized assessments of all participants in this cohort revealed the overall prevalence of any type of tremor was 53.3%. The prevalence of dystonic tremor varied from 36.9% to 48.4%, depending on criteria used to define it. To identify the factors associated with tremors in dystonia, the data were analyzed by generalized linear modeling and cluster analyses. Generalized linear modeling indicated 2 of the strongest factors associated with tremor included body region affected by dystonia and recruitment center. Tremor was also associated with severity of dystonia and duration of dystonia, but not with sex or race. The cluster analysis distinguished 8 subgroups within the whole cohort; defined largely by body region with dystonia, and secondarily by other clinical characteristics.ConclusionThe large number of cases evaluated by an international team of movement disorder experts facilitated the dissection of several important factors that influence the apparent prevalence and phenomenology of tremor in dystonia. These results are valuable for understanding the many differences reported in prior studies, and for guiding future studies of the nosology of tremor and dystonia.

BACKGROUND Pridopidine, in development for Huntington's disease, may modulate aberrant l-dopa-induced effects including l-dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). OBJECTIVE This study investigated whether pridopidine could reduce LID in the MPTP macaque model of Parkinson's disease and characterized the observed behavioral effects in terms of receptor occupancy. METHODS The pharmacokinetic profile and effects of pridopidine (15-30 mg/kg) on parkinsonism, dyskinesia, and quality of on-time, in combination with l-dopa, were assessed in MPTP macaques with LID. Pridopidine receptor occupancy was estimated using known in vitro binding affinities to σ1 and dopamine D2 receptors, in vivo PET imaging, and pharmacokinetic profiling across different species. RESULTS Pridopidine produced a dose-dependent reduction in dyskinesia (up to 71%, 30 mg/kg) and decreased the duration of on-time with disabling dyskinesia evoked by l-dopa by 37% (20 mg/kg) and 60% (30 mg/kg). Pridopidine did not compromise the anti-parkinsonian benefit of l-dopa. Plasma exposures following the ineffective dose (15 mg/kg) were associated with full σ1 occupancy (>80%), suggesting that σ1 engagement alone is unlikely to account for the antidyskinetic benefits of pridopidine. Exposures following effective doses (20-30 mg/kg), while providing full σ1 occupancy, provide only modest dopamine D2 occupancy (

Levodopa-induced dyskinesia is a common complication in Parkinson disease. Pathogenic mechanisms include phasic stimulation of dopamine receptors, nonphysiological levodopa-to-dopamine conversion in serotonergic neurons, hyperactivity of corticostriatal glutamatergic transmission, and overstimulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on dopamine-releasing axons. Delay in initiating levodopa is no longer recommended, as dyskinesia development is a function of disease duration rather than cumulative levodopa exposure. We review current and in-development treatments for peak-dose dyskinesia but suggest that improvements in levodopa delivery alone may reduce its future prevalence. Ann Neurol 2018;84:797-811.

Dyskinesia is a common motor complication associated with the use of levodopa to treat Parkinson's disease. Numerous animal studies in mice, rats, and nonhuman primates have demonstrated that the N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist, amantadine, dose dependently reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). However, none of these studies characterized the amantadine plasma concentrations required for a therapeutic effect. This study evaluates the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship between amantadine plasma concentrations and antidyskinetic efficacy across multiple species to define optimal therapeutic dosing. The PK profile of amantadine was determined in mice, rats, and macaques. Efficacy data from the 6-hydroxydopamine rat and the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine macaque model of LID, along with previously published antidyskinetic efficacy data, were used to establish species-specific PK/PD relationships using a direct-effect maximum possible effect model. Results from the PK/PD model were compared with amantadine plasma concentrations and antidyskinetic effect in a phase 2 study in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with ADS-5102, an extended-release amantadine capsule formulation. Outcomes from each of the species evaluated indicate that the EC50 of amantadine for reducing dyskinesia range from 1025 to 1633 ng/ml (1367 ng/ml for an all-species model). These data are consistent with the mean amantadine plasma concentrations observed in patients with Parkinson's disease (∼1500 ng/ml) treated with ADS-5102 at doses that demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in dyskinesia. These results demonstrate that the EC50 of amantadine for reducing dyskinesia is consistent across multiple species and supports a plasma concentration target of ∼1400 ng/ml to achieve therapeutic efficacy.

Purpose of review To review recent advances in therapeutics for motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Recent findings Neuroprotection remains a large area of investigation with preliminary safety data on alpha synuclein immunotherapy and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists. Novel Monoamine Oxidase B and Caetchol-O-methyltransferase-inhibitors for motor fluctuations have shown benefit and are recently approved for clinical use. Long-acting amantadine has also been approved to reduce dyskinesia. Alternative delivery strategies (sublingual, inhaled) dopaminergics may prove useful for rapid reversal of Parkinson's disease motor symptoms. Advanced therapies (surgery and infusional therapies) continue to be useful in subgroups of patients for motor complications with improved safety and also benefit on some nonmotor symptoms, including neuropsychiatric issues. Specific therapeutics for cognition, swallowing, sleep, and mood disorders had moderate to limited benefits. Exercise-based therapy appears beneficial at all stages of Parkinson's disease. Summary The motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease can be reasonably treated and managed. However, therapies to slow or prevent disease progression remain a focus of research. Despite increased studies, treating nonmotor symptoms remains a challenge and an ongoing priority.

Introduction Technological solutions for quantifying Parkinson's disease (PD) symptoms may provide an objective means to track response to treatment, including side effects such as levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Vision-based systems are advantageous as they do not require physical contact with the body and have minimal instrumentation compared to wearables. We have developed a vision-based system to quantify a change in dyskinesia as reported by patients using 2D videos of clinical assessments during acute levodopa infusions. Methods Nine participants with PD completed a total of 16 levodopa infusions, where they were asked to report important changes in dyskinesia (i.e. onset and remission). Participants were simultaneously rated using the UDysRS Part III (from video recordings analyzed post-hoc). Body joint positions and movements were tracked using a state-of-the-art deep learning pose estimation algorithm applied to the videos. 416 features (e.g. kinematics, frequency distribution) were extracted to characterize movements. The sensitivity and specificity of each feature to patient-reported changes in dyskinesia severity was computed and compared with physician-rated results. Results Features achieved similar or superior performance to the UDysRS for detecting the onset and remission of dyskinesia. The best AUC for detecting onset of dyskinesia was 0.822 and for remission of dyskinesia was 0.958, compared to 0.826 and 0.802 for the UDysRS. Conclusions Video-based features may provide an objective means of quantifying the severity of levodopa-induced dyskinesia, and have responsiveness as good or better than the clinically-rated UDysRS. The results demonstrate encouraging evidence for future integration of video-based technology into clinical research and eventually clinical practice.

Objective The objective of this review was to update evidence-based medicine recommendations for treating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Background The Movement Disorder Society Evidence-Based Medicine Committee recommendations for treatments of PD were first published in 2002 and updated in 2011, and we continued the review to December 31, 2016. Methods Level I studies of interventions for motor symptoms were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion and quality scoring were as previously reported. Five clinical indications were considered, and conclusions regarding the implications for clinical practice are reported. Results A total of 143 new studies qualified. There are no clinically useful interventions to prevent/delay disease progression. For monotherapy of early PD, nonergot dopamine agonists, oral levodopa preparations, selegiline, and rasagiline are clinically useful. For adjunct therapy in early/stable PD, nonergot dopamine agonists, rasagiline, and zonisamide are clinically useful. For adjunct therapy in optimized PD for general or specific motor symptoms including gait, rivastigmine is possibly useful and physiotherapy is clinically useful; exercise-based movement strategy training and formalized patterned exercises are possibly useful. There are no new studies and no changes in the conclusions for the prevention/delay of motor complications. For treating motor fluctuations, most nonergot dopamine agonists, pergolide, levodopa ER, levodopa intestinal infusion, entacapone, opicapone, rasagiline, zonisamide, safinamide, and bilateral STN and GPi DBS are clinically useful. For dyskinesia, amantadine, clozapine, and bilateral STN DBS and GPi DBS are clinically useful. Conclusions The options for treating PD symptoms continues to expand. These recommendations allow the treating physician to determine which intervention to recommend to an individual patient. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID) remains a significant problem in the management of Parkinson's disease (PD). In rodent and macaque models of PD, delta opioid receptor agonists have anti-parkinsonian actions while mu opioid antagonists can reduce the expression of LID. DPI-289 is a novel molecule with a unique combination of opioid receptor DAMA actions: delta agonist (Ki: 0.73 nM); mu antagonist (Ki: 12 nM). We demonstrated that DPI-289 has oral bioavailability and established its pharmacokinetic profile in both rat and primate. We hypothesised that these combined DAMA actions would provide an enhancement of L-DOPA effect without an associated increase in dyskinesia. In parkinsonian 6-OHDA lesioned rats and MPTP-lesioned macaques, DPI-289 provided anti-parkinsonian actions as monotherapy and an enhancement of L-DOPA benefit. Thus, acute administration of DPI-289 (3 mg/kg, p.o.) to 6-OHDA-lesioned rats produced a significant reduction in forelimb asymmetry (by 48%) that was maintained throughout the fifteen-day repeat-treatment period. Importantly, and in contrast to L-DOPA administration (6 mg/kg, i.p.), these benefits were not compromised by the development of abnormal involuntary movements. In the macaque, as monotherapy, DPI-289 (10 and 20 mg/kg) had significant, though incomplete, anti-parkinsonian actions lasting approximately 4 h. These benefits were not associated with dyskinesia. In fact, over the 6 h period of observation, DPI-289 (20 mg/kg) decreased parkinsonism by 19% and increased activity by 67% compared to vehicle treatment. By contrast, while high-dose L-DOPA (LDh) alone alleviated parkinsonism (for 3 h) this benefit was accompanied by significant dyskinesia that was disabling in nature. LDh provided a 50% reduction in parkinsonism over 6 h and 151% increase in activity. The combination of DPI-289 (20 mg/kg) and a low-dose of L-DOPA (LDl) provided anti-parkinsonian benefits greater than LDl alone without eliciting any significant dyskinesia. Treatment with LDl alone provided only transient statistically significant anti-parkinsonian benefit. However, the combination of LDl and DPI-289 reduced parkinsonism for 6 h (duration of monitoring), with parkinsonism being reduced by 35% and activity increased by 90% but with no increase in dyskinesia over that observed with LDl alone. Thus, DPI-289 has potential to improve the benefits of dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson's disease.

Background In our clinical experience, people with Parkinson's disease (PwP) and their caregivers have difficulty understanding the complexities of the disease which has a multitude of symptoms and involved therapies. We undertook a Needs Assessment to understand the need for and to guide the development of an educational tool. Methods: We invited PwP, caregivers and health care providers (HCP) from across Canada to participate in an online survey to determine the need and desired content for such a tool. Results Respondents included 450 PwP, 335 caregivers and 96 HCP from across Canada. 86.5% of HCP reported that it was ‘very important’ for patients to understand issues in PD and 84.4% would use a visual aid to explain these issues. 81.9-95.7% of caregivers and PwP were not ‘very satisfied’ with the explanations of all domains in PD. Non-motor symptoms and cognitive issues were highly ranked by all groups as difficult to understand or explain. Older PwP, those with PD for less than 5 years and those who reported that their HCP spent less than 15 minutes counselling in each clinic visit were less likely to fully understand and be satisfied with the explanations of most issues in PD. Interpretation There is a need for better education of patients of issues in PD in the clinic setting. Older PwP recently diagnosed have the greatest educational needs. Potential users indicate that a visual aid would help and non-motor symptoms, particularly cognitive issues need to be a focus of such a tool. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Parkinson's disease (PD) has long been seen as a disorder caused by degeneration of the dopaminergic system, leading to the classic motor manifestations of the disease. However, there is now overwhelming evidence that PD is more than a disease merely caused by dopamine depletion. It is well-known that a myriad of other neurotransmitters are affected by the disease process. One such neurotransmitter is serotonin (5-HT). 5-HT has been shown to play a role in several motor and nonmotor manifestations of PD, including tremor, cognition, depression and psychosis. 5-HT also seems to play a critical role in L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia. A breadth of preclinical studies and clinical trials have been conducted that aimed at modulating the 5-HT system in order to alleviate depression, cognitive deficits, psychosis, and dyskinesia. In this Review, we summarize recent advances in the 5-HT field in PD, but with a translational emphasis. We start by presenting a novel nonhuman primate model of PD that presents with dual dopamine and 5-HT lesions. We then present preclinical and clinical data that introduce new concepts, such as the use of biased and partial agonists, as well as molecules recently introduced to the field of PD, such as eltoprazine, pimavanserin, nelotanserin, and SYN-120, to enhance therapeutic benefit while minimizing adverse events, notably on parkinsonian disability.