1. Preventing technique‐related complications in spinal cord stimulation trials: The Dural Substitute Confetti technique. A retrospective monocentric analysis.
- Author
-
Dario, Alessandro, Ferlendis, Luca, Bossi, Bianca, and Locatelli, Davide
- Subjects
- *
SPINAL cord , *PULSE generators , *SURGICAL complications , *MEDICAL screening , *CHRONIC pain , *ANALGESIA - Abstract
Background Methods Results Conclusions Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for chronic pain, employing screening trials to identify suitable candidates before implantation. However, complications arising from both technique and medical factors present challenges to this practice. This study introduces the Dural Substitute Confetti technique, which addresses technique‐related complications during SCS implantation by preventing scar‐induced lead migration or breakage and reducing operating times.We conducted a retrospective analysis on 174 patients treated with SCS trials from 2017 to 2022 at our institution. Of these, 85.1% proceeded to permanent implantation. During trial surgery, synthetic dural substitutes (DS) were used to protect leads, which remained connected to an external pulse generator (EPG) for 20–28 days (mean 21.4 days). Utilizing the DS Confetti technique, leads were easily dissected from the DS during the second surgery and connected to an internal pulse generator (IPG). We compared complications and surgical times before and after the introduction of this technique in 2017.Following the complete SCS trial, patients experienced over 50% pain relief, with an implant‐to‐trial ratio of 85.1% and a mean follow‐up of 52 months. No technique‐related complications occurred during the trial period post‐2017, while the pre‐2017 group had a 3.9% lead migration rate due to scarring, necessitating re‐implantation. The average surgery duration decreased from 54 min pre‐2017 to 32 min post‐2017. Medical‐related complications included infections (2.1%) and wound dehiscence (1.3%).The DS Confetti technique prevents scar adhesion formation during screening trials, thereby facilitating and expediting the definitive SCS implantation. Additionally, it may also reduce the risk of lead migration and iatrogenic damage, potentially lowering technique‐related complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF