Search

Background/Aim: The application of next generation sequencing (NGS) technology in the genetic investigation of hereditary cancer is important for clinical surveillance, therapeutic approach, and reducing the risk of developing new malignancies. The aim of the study was to explore genetic predisposition in individuals referred for hereditary cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 8,261 individuals were referred for multigene genetic testing, during the period 2020-2023, in the laboratory, and underwent multigene genetic testing using NGS. Among the examined individuals, 56.17% were diagnosed with breast cancer, 6.77% with ovarian cancer, 2.88% with colorectal cancer, 1.91% with prostate cancer, 6.43% were healthy with a significant family history of cancer, while 3.06% had a different type of cancer and 0.21% had not provided any information. Additionally, in 85 women with breast cancer we performed whole exome sequencing analysis. Results: 20% of the examined individuals carried a pathogenic variant. Specifically, 54.8% of the patients had a pathogenic variant in a clinically significant gene (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, PMS2, CDKN2A, MLH1, MSH2, TP53, MSH6, APC, RAD51D, PTEN, RET, CDH1, MEN1, and VHL). Among the different types of pathogenic variants detected, a significant percentage (6.52%) represented copy number variation (CNV). With WES analysis, the following findings were detected: CTC1: c.880C>T, p.(Gln294*); MLH3: c.405del, p.(Asp136Metfs*2), PPM1D: c.1426_1430del, p.(Glu476Leufs*3), and SDHB: c.395A>G, p.(His132Arg). Conclusion: Comprehensive multigene genetic testing is necessary for appropriate clinical management of pathogenic variants’ carriers. Additionally, the information obtained is important for determining the risk of malignancy development in family members of the examined individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prominent tumor type among women, accounting for 32% of newly diagnosed cancer cases. BC risk factors include inherited germline pathogenic gene variants and family history of disease. However, the etiology of the disease remains occult in most cases. Therefore, in the absence of high-risk factors, a polygenic basis has been suggested to contribute to susceptibility. This information is utilized to calculate the Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) which is indicative of BC risk. This study aimed to evaluate retrospectively the clinical usefulness of PRS integration in BC risk calculation, utilizing a group of patients who have already been diagnosed with BC. The study comprised 105 breast cancer patients with hereditary genetic analysis results obtained by NGS. The selection included all testing results: high-risk gene-positive, intermediate/low-risk gene-positive, and negative. PRS results were obtained from an external laboratory (Allelica). PRS-based BC risk was computed both with and without considering additional risk factors, including gene status and family history. A significantly different PRS percentile distribution consistent with higher BC risk was observed in our cohort compared to the general population. Higher PRS-based BC risks were detected in younger patients and in those with FH of cancers. Among patients with a pathogenic germline variant detected, reduced PRS values were observed, while the BC risk was mainly determined by a monogenic etiology. Upon comprehensive analysis encompassing FH, gene status, and PRS, it was determined that 41.90% (44/105) of the patients demonstrated an elevated susceptibility for BC. Moreover, 63.63% of the patients with FH of BC and without an inherited pathogenic genetic variant detected showed increased BC risk by incorporating the PRS result. Our results indicate a major utility of PRS calculation in women with FH in the absence of a monogenic etiology detected by NGS. By combining high-risk strategies, such as inherited disease analysis, with low-risk screening strategies, such as FH and PRS, breast cancer risk stratification can be improved. This would facilitate the development of more effective preventive measures and optimize the allocation of healthcare resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: Gliomas are highly heterogeneous malignancies originating from diverse cell types within the brain. Although their precise etiology is frequently unknown, risk factors, such as chemical exposure, radiation, and specific uncommon genetic disorders have been identified. Diagnosis typically entails imaging tests, such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, complemented by a biopsy for confirmation, which may be further validated through genetic testing. Case Report: Next-generation sequencing technology revealed germline co-deletion deletion of cyclindependent kinase inhibitor 2 A and B genes (CDKN2A and CDKN2B) in a patient diagnosed with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma based on the tumor's molecular characteristics. Following this result, we performed focused genetic analysis with use of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technology for the mother that revealed the same co-deletion. Moreover, due to the father's neuroendocrine pancreatic cancer, application of the NGS technology detected a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1-interacting helicase 1 (BRIP1) gene. Comprehensive multi-gene testing conducted within the familial context, marked by a varied spectrum of cancer type, revealed a constellation of genetic predispositions. Conclusion: This case study underscores the critical importance of molecular testing for tumor characterization and highlights the pivotal role of genetic testing in facilitating early intervention and screening for at-risk family members. Furthermore, the identification of germline co-deletions in cancer lays the foundation for the development of targeted therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring normal cellular regulation and improving patient management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: Breast cancer remains the most prevalent type of cancer among women worldwide, and it remains the primary cause of cancer-related deaths in this demographic. Neuroendocrine breast cancer (NBC), an uncommon subtype comprising less than 1% of cases, typically occurs in older women and displays as a slow-growing, low-grade condition. NBC exhibits distinct histological patterns and immunohistochemical markers. Given the limited data on NBC, assays are required that will provide information on molecular profiling and assist in clinical decision making. The aim of the study was to investigate whether a modern Multigene Assay (MGA) could assist on treatment planning of NBC patients. Case Report: A cohort of four patients was analyzed using a MGA. The presented cases featured young, pre-menopausal women with clear NBC, lacking family history. All were lymph nodenegative, with robust expression of neuroendocrine markers. Despite high hormone receptor expression, all tumors were poorly differentiated with elevated Ki67 levels. Oncotype DX analysis indicated a need for chemotherapy in three cases and not in one. This underscores the heterogeneity within NBC, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment decisions. Conclusion: While NBC is rare and lacks extensive studies, the use of multigene assays like Oncotype DX may play a pivotal role in treatment planning, especially in cases with varying histological parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The aim of this study was to explore the utility of cascade family testing (CFT) in families of breast cancer patients who carry specific genetic variations. We conducted genetic analysis in a group of breast cancer patients and identified genetic variations in over 20% of them; thus, CFT was recommended to their first-degree relatives. Among those tested, the majority were asymptomatic females and mainly offspring, siblings, or parents of the patients. The study showed that CFT was most commonly performed in families with high-risk genetic findings, and we concluded that CFT could be a valuable approach for preventing hereditary cancers by identifying at-risk family members. We also emphasized the need for improved genetic counseling and communication to ensure effective implementation. Background: Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes are responsible for approximately 5–10% of all diagnosed cancer cases. In order to identify individuals at risk in a cost-efficient manner, family members of individuals carrying pathogenic alterations are tested only for the specific variant that was identified in their carrier relative. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical use and implementation of cascade family testing (CFT) in families of breast cancer patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs/LPVs) in cancer-related predisposition genes. Methods: Germline sequencing was carried out with NGS technology using a 52-gene panel, and cascade testing was performed by Sanger sequencing or MLPA. Results: In a cohort of 1785 breast cancer patients (families), 20.3% were found to have PVs/LPVs. Specifically, 52.2%, 25.1%, and 22.7% of patients had positive findings in high-, intermediate-, and low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes, respectively. Although CFT was recommended to all families, only 117 families (32.3%) agreed to proceed with genetic testing. Among the first-degree relatives who underwent CFT, 70.3% were female, and 108 of 121 (89.3%) were cancer free. Additionally, 42.7%, 36.7%, and 20.6% were offspring, siblings, and parents of the subject, respectively. Our data suggest that CFT was mostly undertaken (104/117, 88.8%) in families with positive findings in high-risk genes. Conclusions: Cascade family testing can be a powerful tool for primary cancer prevention by identifying at-risk family members. It is of utmost importance to implement genetic counseling approaches leading to increased awareness and communication of genetic testing results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: Germline copy number variation (CNV) is a type of genetic variant that predisposes significantly to inherited cancers. Today, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have contributed to multi gene panel analysis in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: A total of 2,163 patients were screened for cancer susceptibility, using a solution-based capture method. A panel of 52 genes was used for targeted NGS. The capture-based approach enables computational analysis of CNVs from NGS data. We studied the performance of the CNV module of the commercial software suite SeqPilot (JSI Medical Systems) and of the non-commercial tool panelcn.MOPS. Additionally, we tested the performance of digital multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (digitalMLPA). Results: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LP) were identified in 464 samples (21.5%). CNV accounts for 10.8% (50/464) of pathogenic variants, referring to deletion/duplication of one or more exons of a gene. In patients with breast and ovarian cancer, CNVs accounted for 10.2% and 6.8% of pathogenic variants, respectively. In colorectal cancer patients, CNV accounted for 28.6% of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. Conclusion: In silico CNV detection tools provide a viable and cost-effective method to identify CNVs from NGS experiments. CNVs constitute a substantial percentage of P/LP variants, since they represent up to one of every ten P/LP findings identified by NGS multigene analysis; therefore, their evaluation is highly recommended to improve the diagnostic yield of hereditary cancer analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: The use of multi-gene panels for germline testing in breast cancer enables the estimation of cancer risk and guides risk-reducing management options. The aim of this study was to present data that demonstrate the different levels of actionability for multi-gene panels used in genetic testing of breast cancer patients and their family members. Materials and Methods: We performed an analysis in our clinical database to identify breast cancer patients undergoing genetic testing. We reviewed positive results in respect of risk estimation and management, cascade family testing, secondary findings and information for treatment decision-making. Results: A total of 415 positive test reports were identified with 57.1%, 18.1%, 10.8% and 13.5% of individuals having pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in high, moderate, low and with insufficient evidence for breast cancer risk genes, respectively. Six point seven percent of individuals were double heterozygotes. Conclusion: Germline findings in 92% of individuals are linked to evidence-based treatment information and risk estimates for predisposition to breast and/or other cancer types. The use of germline findings for treatment decision making expands the indication of genetic testing to include individuals that could benefit from targeted treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]