Search

PURPOSE CARTITUDE-1, a phase Ib/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, yielded early, deep, and durable responses at 12 months. Here, we present updated results 2 years after last patient in (median follow-up [MFU] approximately 28 months), including analyses of high-risk patient subgroups. METHODS Eligible patients had relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, had received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy or were double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug and had received prior proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 therapy. Patients received a single cilta-cel infusion 5-7 days after lymphodepletion. Responses were assessed by an independent review committee. RESULTS At a MFU of 27.7 months (N = 97), the overall response rate was 97.9% (95% CI, 92.7 to 99.7); 82.5% (95% CI, 73.4 to 89.4) of patients achieved a stringent complete response. Median duration of response was not estimable. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached; 27-month PFS and OS rates were 54.9% (95% CI, 44.0 to 64.6) and 70.4% (95% CI, 60.1 to 78.6), respectively. Overall response rates were high across all subgroups (95.1%-100%). Duration of response, PFS, and/or OS were shorter in patients with high-risk cytogenetics, International Staging System stage III, high tumor burden, or plasmacytomas. The safety profile was manageable with no new cilta-cel–related cytokine release syndrome and one new case of parkinsonism (day 914 after cilta-cel) since the last report. CONCLUSION At approximately 28 months MFU, patients treated with cilta-cel maintained deep and durable responses, observed in both standard and high-risk subgroups. The risk/benefit profile of cilta-cel remained favorable with longer follow-up.

CARTITUDE-1 is a phase 1b-2 study evaluating ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy with two B-cell maturation antigen-targeting single-domain antibodies, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Primary efficacy outcomes have previously been reported. Here, we report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) secondary outcomes evaluated using patient-reported outcomes.This single-arm, open-label, phwase 1b-2 study was done at 16 centres in the USA. Patients were aged 18 years or older with diagnosis of multiple myeloma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less with three or more previous lines of therapy, or were double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug, and had received a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 antibody. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0·75 × 10Between July 16, 2018, and Oct 7, 2019, 78 patients were enrolled and underwent apheresis in phase 2 of the study. 68 patients were treated (43 [63%] male, 49 [72%] White), and their patient-reported outcomes assessed (median follow-up 16·9 months, IQR 15·7-17·5). After infusion, a transient decline was observed, followed by improvements in global health status (mean change from baseline to day 464 +8·0 points, SD 20·9), physical (+4·6 points, 21·1), and emotional functional scales (+1·9 points, 23·7) over time, and declines for symptom-based scores (-14·1 pain, SD 31·5 and -15·4 fatigue; SD 29·5), indicating improved patient HRQOL following treatment with cilta-cel.These durable HRQOL improvements are consistent with clinical findings, in which a single cilta-cel infusion led to substantial and durable responses in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. These results support the use of cilta-cel in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.Janssen ResearchDevelopment and Legend Biotech USA.

This study estimated the comparative efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; CARTITUDE-1), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy, versus 3 non-CAR-T therapies (belantamab mafodotin [DREAMM-2], selinexor plus dexamethasone [STORM Part 2], and melphalan flufenamide plus dexamethasone [HORIZON]), each with distinct mechanisms of action, for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who were triple-class exposed to an immunomodulatory drug, proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.Pairwise matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparisons (MAICs) were conducted using patient-level data for cilta-cel from CARTITUDE-1 and summary level data for each comparator (2.5 mg/kg cohort in DREAMM-2, modified intention-to-treat population in STORM Part 2, and triple-class refractory patients in HORIZON). Treated patients from CARTITUDE-1 who satisfied the eligibility of the comparator trial were included. MAICs adjusted for imbalances in important prognostic factors between CARTITUDE-1 and the comparator populations. Comparative efficacy of cilta-cel versus each therapy was estimated for overall response rate, complete response or better rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.After adjustment, patients treated with cilta-cel demonstrated at least a 3.1-fold and at least a 10.3-fold increase in the likelihood of achieving an overall response or complete response or better, respectively, at least a 74% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death, and at least a 47% reduction in the risk of death. These results were statistically significant.Cilta-cel showed improved efficacy over each comparator for all outcomes, demonstrating its potential as an efficacious treatment for patients with triple-class exposed RRMM.

OBJECTIVE This study estimated the comparative efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) versus the approved idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) dose range of 300-460 × 106 CAR-positive T-cells for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who were previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (i.e. triple-class exposed) using matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparisons (MAICs). METHODS MAICs were performed with individual patient data for cilta-cel (CARTITUDE-1; NCT03548207) and published summary-level data for ide-cel (KarMMa; NCT03361748). Treated patients from CARTITUDE-1 who satisfied the eligibility criteria for KarMMa were included in the analyses. The MAIC adjusted for unbalanced baseline covariates of prognostic significance identified in the literature and by clinical expertise. Comparative efficacy was estimated for overall response rate (ORR), complete response or better (≥CR) rate, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Cilta-cel was associated with statistically significantly improved ORR (odds ratio [OR]: 94.93 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.86, 412.25; p

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting B-cell maturation antigen have shown positive responses in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The phase 2 portion of the CARTITUDE-1 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) included a cohort of Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Following a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m

Background: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; JNJ-68284528; LCAR-B38M CAR-T cells) is a chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy with 2 B-cell maturation antigen-targeting single-domain antibodies designed to confer avidity. In the phase 1 LEGEND-2 study in China, LCAR-B38M yielded deep, durable responses with a manageable safety profile in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). The phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study (NCT03548207) is further evaluating cilta-cel in this pt population in the US. We present updated data from the phase 1b portion along with initial phase 2 data. Methods: Eligible pts (aged ≥18 y) were diagnosed with MM per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and had measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, received ≥3 prior regimens or were double-refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug, and received an anti-CD38 antibody. After apheresis, bridging therapy was permitted. Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2 daily for 3 d were used for lymphodepletion. A single infusion of cilta-cel at a target dose of 0.75×106 (range 0.5-1.0×106) CAR+ viable T cells/kg was administered 5-7 d after start of lymphodepletion. The primary objective of the phase 1b portion was to characterize cilta-cel safety and establish the recommended phase 2 dose; the primary objective of the phase 2 portion was to evaluate cilta-cel efficacy. Response was assessed per IMWG criteria and minimal residual disease (MRD) by next-generation sequencing. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using CTCAE v5.0. In the phase 1b portion, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded by Lee et al (Blood 2014) and neurotoxicity by CTCAE v5.0; in the phase 2 portion, CRS and neurotoxicity were graded by American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) criteria. In this combined analysis, Lee et al and CTCAE v5.0 were mapped to ASTCT criteria for CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), respectively. Results: As of the May 20, 2020 clinical cutoff, 97 pts (58.8% male; median age 61.0 y [range 43-78]) with R/R MM received cilta-cel (29 in phase 1b; 68 in phase 2). Median follow-up duration was 8.8 mo (range 1.5-20.4). Pts had received a median of 6 prior lines of therapy (range 3-18); 83.5% were penta-exposed, 87.6% were triple-refractory, 41.2% were penta-refractory, and 97.9% were refractory to last line of therapy. Overall response rate per independent review committee (primary endpoint) was 94.8% (95% CI 88.4-98.3), with a stringent complete response rate of 55.7% (95% CI 45.2-65.8), very good partial response rate of 32.0% (95% CI 22.9-42.2), and partial response rate of 7.2% (95% CI 3.0-14.3). All pts achieved a reduction in M-protein. Median time to first response was 1.0 mo (range 0.9-5.8; 80.4% ≤1.0 mo), and median time to complete response or better was 1.8 mo (range 0.9-12.5; 74.1% ≤3.0 mo); responses deepened over time (Figure). Median duration of response was not reached (NR). Of 52 MRD-evaluable pts, 94.2% were MRD-negative at 10-5. The 6-mo progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates (95% CI) were 87.4% (78.9-92.7) and 93.8% (86.7-97.2), respectively; median PFS and OS were NR. Ten deaths occurred during the study; 8 were due to AEs (both related and unrelated; CRS/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, neurotoxicity, respiratory failure, sepsis, septic shock, pneumonia, lung abscess, and acute myelogenous leukemia [n=1 each]), and 2 due to progressive disease. AEs reported in >70% of pts were CRS (94.8%; grade [gr] 3/4 4.1%), neutropenia (90.7%; gr 3/4 90.7%), anemia (81.4%; gr 3/4 68.0%), and thrombocytopenia (79.4%; gr 3/4 59.8%). Median time to CRS onset was 7.0 d (range 1-12) and median duration 4.0 d (range 1-27, excluding n=1 with 97 d). CAR-T cell-related neurotoxicity was reported in 20.6% of pts (gr 3/4 10.3%). Cilta-cel CAR+ T cells showed maximum peripheral expansion at 14 d (range 9-43). Among pts with 6 mo' individual follow-up, 67% had cilta-cel CAR+ T cells below the level of quantification (2 cells/µL) in peripheral blood. Conclusions: Preliminary phase 1b/2 data from CARTITUDE-1 indicate a single low-dose infusion of cilta-cel leads to early, deep, and durable responses in heavily pretreated pts with MM with a safety profile consistent with LEGEND-2. Further investigation of cilta-cel in other MM populations is underway. Disclosures Madduri: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Foundation Medicine: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Legend: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; Kinevant: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau. Berdeja:Teva: Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; EMD Sorono: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Prothena: Consultancy; Cellularity: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; CURIS: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Glenmark: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vivolux: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kesios: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Usmani:Celgene: Other; BMS, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; SkylineDX: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding. Jakubowiak:Adaptive, Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cohen:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Patents/Intellectual property licensed, Research Funding. Stewart:Janssen, BMS, Sanofi-Aventis, GSK: Honoraria; Tempus, Inc., Genomics England LLC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hari:Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Htut:City of Hope Medical Center: Current Employment. Munshi:OncoPep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; C4: Current equity holder in private company. Deol:Novartis: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria. Singh:Janssen: Current Employment. Zudaire:Janssen: Current Employment. Yeh:Janssen: Current Employment. Allred:Janssen: Current Employment. Olyslager:Janssen: Current Employment. Banerjee:Janssen: Current Employment. Goldberg:Johnson & Johnson: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Schecter:Janssen: Current Employment. Jackson:Janssen: Current Employment; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Consultancy. Deraedt:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zhuang:Janssen: Current Employment. Infante:Janssen: Current Employment. Geng:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Wu:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Carrasco:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Akram:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Hossain:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Rizvi:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Fan:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Jagannath:BMS, Janssen, Karyopharm, Legend Biotech, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy. Lin:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Vineti: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin:AMGEN: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding.

This study used the latest available data cuts from the CARTITUDE-1 and KarMMa clinical trials to update previously published matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparisons (MAICs) assessing the comparative efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) versus the FDA-approved idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) dose range of 300 to 450 × 106 CAR-positive T-cells in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who were previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (i.e. triple-class exposed). MAICs were performed with the latest available individual patient data for cilta-cel (CARTITUDE-1) and published summary-level data for ide-cel (KarMMa). The analyses included treated patients from CARTITUDE-1 who satisfied the eligibility criteria for KarMMa. The MAIC adjusted for unbalanced baseline covariates of prognostic significance identified in the literature and by clinical expertise. Comparative efficacy was assessed for overall response rate (ORR), complete response or better (≥CR) rate, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Cilta-cel was associated with statistically significantly improved ORR (odds ratio [OR]: 94.93 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.86, 412.25; p < .0001]; relative risk [RR]: 1.34), ≥CR rate (OR: 5.65 [95% CI: 2.51, 12.69; p < .0001]; RR: 2.23), DoR (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.30, 0.88; p = .0152]), PFS, (HR: 0.38 [95% CI: 0.24, 0.62; p < .0001]), and OS (HR: 0.43 [95% CI: 0.22, 0.88; p = .0200]) compared with ide-cel. These analyses demonstrate improved efficacy with cilta-cel versus ide-cel for all outcomes over longer follow-up and highlight its therapeutic potential in triple-class exposed RRMM patients.

Relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is a disease that is nonresponsive or progressive on therapy, and although patients can achieve remission, relapse is common. As more treatment options become available for multiple myeloma (MM), it is important to understand patients' experiences of current and emerging therapies.This study aimed to better understand patient experiences with treatment and therapies for MM using qualitative interviews and patient-reported information (PRI) shared on social media.Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with adults with RRMM who resided in the United States. In addition to the interviews, PRI was collected from YouTube and a patient advocacy website. Key themes from the interviews and PRI were summarized, and illustrative quotes were extracted.Twenty participants were interviewed; 11 were female, and mean (standard deviation) age was 60 (7.0) years. The PRI included 14 posts and 19 unique contributors (10 were female). Similar treatment-related symptoms were reported in the interviews and PRI. Fatigue and pain were the most frequently reported symptoms while receiving treatment in both the interviews and PRI. These symptoms had a meaningful impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL); being off treatment and returning to normal living was described as an ideal treatment outcome. Nearly all interview participants (n = 18) preferred a treatment that would allow for a treatment-free interval, if it had the same efficacy and safety profile as a continuous treatment.The symptom experience reported in this study is consistent with known RRMM symptoms and HRQOL impacts. Additionally, this study highlighted that patients' treatment expectations are changing relative to their past treatment experience. Individuals living with RRMM strongly desire therapies with a treatment-free interval and minimal impact on their HRQOL.

8020 Background: Cohort A of the multicohort phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) study is evaluating cilta-cel safety and efficacy in pts with MM who received 1–3 prior LOT and were len-refractory – a difficult-to-treat population with poor prognosis. We present updated results. Methods: Pts had progressive MM after 1–3 prior LOT, including a PI and IMiD, were len-refractory, and had no prior exposure to BCMA-targeting agents. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) was given post lymphodepletion. Safety and efficacy were assessed, and the primary endpoint was MRD negativity at 10-5. Management strategies were implemented to minimize risk of movement/neurocognitive AEs (MNTs). Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses (Cmax and Tmax of CAR+ T-cell transgene levels in blood) are being conducted, as well as analyses of levels of CRS-related cytokines (eg, IL-6) over time, peak levels of cytokines by response and CRS, association of cytokine levels with ICANS, and CAR+ T cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response, CRS, and ICANS. Results: As of January 2022 (median follow-up [MFU] 17.1 mo [range 3.3–23.1]), 20 pts (65% male; median age 60 y [range 38–75]) received cilta-cel. Pts received a median of 2 (range 1–3) prior LOT, and a median of 3.5 y (range 0.7–8.0) since MM diagnosis. 95% were refractory to last LOT, and 40% were triple-class refractory. ORR was 95%, 90% achieved CR or better, and 95% had ≥VGPR. Median times to first and best response were 1.0 mo (range 0.7–3.3) and 2.6 mo (range 0.9–13.6), respectively. 16 pts were MRD-evaluable, all of whom achieved MRD negativity at 10-5. Median DOR was not reached and 12-mo event-free rate was 79%. The 12-mo PFS rate was 75%. Median time to onset of CRS was 7 d (range 5–9) and occurred in 95% of pts (gr 3/4: 10%), with median duration of 3 d (range 2–12). Neurotoxicity occurred in 30% of pts (5 gr 1/2; 1 gr 3/4). 3 pts (15%) had ICANS (all gr 1/2); 1 pt had gr 2 facial paralysis. No MNTs were seen. 1 death occurred due to COVID-19 (assessed as tx-related by the investigator), 2 due to progressive disease, and 1 due to sepsis (not related to tx). Preliminary PK analyses indicate that peak expansion of CAR-T cells occurred at d 10.5 (range 8.7–42.9) and median persistence was 153.5 d (range 57.1–336.8). Conclusions: At a longer MFU of 17.1 mo, a single cilta-cel infusion led to deepening and durable responses in pts with MM who had 1–3 prior LOT and were len-refractory. Follow-up is ongoing. Updated and in-depth PK, cytokine, and CAR-T subset analyses and clinical correlation will be presented and provide novel insights into biological correlates of efficacy and safety in this pt population. This pt population is being further evaluated in the CARTITUDE-4 study (NCT04181827), which has concluded enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04133636.

Background Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a CAR-T cell therapy with two B-cell maturation antigen–targeting single-domain antibodies. The phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study is evaluating cilta-cel in patients (pts) with RRMM. Here we report updated results from a longer median duration of follow-up of 18 months (mos). Methods Eligible pts had MM, received ≥3 prior regimens (or were double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug), and received anti-CD38 antibody. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose: 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg; range, 0.5–1.0×106) was given 5–7 days (d) after lymphodepletion with 300 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide and 30 mg/m2 fludarabine daily for 3 d. Primary objectives were to assess cilta-cel safety, confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (phase 1b), and evaluate efficacy (phase 2). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded by Lee et al (Blood 2014) and neurotoxicity by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), v5.0 in phase 1b. CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded by American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) criteria in phase 2. Here, Lee et al and CTCAE v5.0 were mapped to ASTCT for CRS and ICANS, respectively. Results As of Feb 11, 2021, 97 pts (median of 6 prior lines) received cilta-cel. Overall response rate was 97.9% (95% CI, 92.7–99.7), with 80.4% achieving stringent complete response (sCR) and 94.8% achieving ≥very good partial response. Median time to first response was 1 mo (range, 0.9–10.7), and median time to ≥CR was 2.6 mos (range, 0.9–15.2). Median duration of response was 21.8 mos (95% CI, 21.8–NE). Of 61 pts evaluable for minimal residual disease (MRD), 91.8% were MRD negative at 10-5. 18-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates (95% CI) were 66% (54.9–75.0) and 80.9% (71.4–87.6), respectively. Median PFS was 22.8 mos (95% CI, 22.8–NE) for all pts, and not reached for pts with sCR. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) ≥20% included neutropenia (95%), anemia (68%), leukopenia (61%), thrombocytopenia (60%), and lymphopenia (50%). CRS occurred in 95% of pts (4% grade 3/4); median time to onset was 7 d (range, 1–12), and median duration was 4 d (range, 1–14, except 1 pt with 97 d duration). CRS resolved in all but one with grade 5 CRS/haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. CAR-T cell neurotoxicity occurred in 21% of pts (grade ≥3, 10%). 21 deaths occurred during the study after cilta-cel infusion: none within the first 30 d, 2 within 100 d, and 19 after 100 d. Ten deaths were due to disease progression, 6 were treatment-related, and 5 were due to AEs unrelated to treatment. Conclusions At a median follow-up of 18 mos, a single infusion of cilta-cel yielded early, deep, and durable responses in heavily pretreated pts with RRMM, with manageable safety. Cilta-cel is being investigated in other MM populations in earlier lines of therapy and in outpatient settings.

Context Cilta-cel, a CAR-T cell therapy containing 2 BCMA-targeting single domain antibodies designed to confer high avidity binding, is being evaluated in the CARTITUDE-1 phase 1b/2 study. Objectives Provide updated results with a longer duration (median 12.4 months) of follow-up. Patients or Other Participants Patients had RRMM, measurable disease, ≥3 prior regimens (or double refractory to proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug) and received anti-CD38. Interventions A single cilta-cel infusion at the targeted dose of 0.75×106 (0.5–1.0×106) CAR+ viable T cells/kg was infused after cyclophosphamide/fludarabine lymphodepletion. Main Outcomes Measures The primary objectives were characterization of cilta-cel safety and confirmation of recommended phase 2 dose (phase 1b) and evaluation of efficacy (phase 2). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded by Lee 2014 and neurotoxicity by CTCAE in phase 1b; both were graded by ASTCT criteria in phase 2. Lee 2014 and CTCAE grading were mapped to ASTCT criteria for CRS and ICANS, respectively. Response was assessed per IMWG criteria. Results At 12.4-month median follow-up, 97 patients (median of 6 prior lines) received cilta-cel. Overall response rate was 97% (95% CI, 91–99), and 67% had stringent complete response (sCR). Median time to first response was 1 month (range, 1–9), median time to ≥CR was 2 months (range, 1–15), and median duration of response was not reached. Of 57 minimal residual disease (MRD)-evaluable patients, 93% were MRD-negative at 10–5. The 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates (95% CI) were 77% (66–84) and 89% (80–94), respectively; median PFS was not reached. Grade 3/4 hematologic AEs included neutropenia (95%), anemia (68%), leukopenia (61%), thrombocytopenia (60%), and lymphopenia (50%). CRS occurred in 95% of patients (4% grade 3/4), with median time to onset of 7 days (range, 1–12). CAR-T cell neurotoxicity occurred in 21% patients (10% grade ≥3). Fourteen deaths occurred during the study: 0 ≤30 days, 2 ≤100 days, and 12 >100 days post-infusion, of which 5 were from disease progression and 4 from treatment-related AEs. Conclusions A single cilta-cel dose yielded early, deep, and durable responses with manageable safety in heavily pre-treated patients with RRMM. Acknowledgement The study was funded by Janssen Research & Development, LLC and Legend Biotech, Inc.

Summary Background CARTITUDE-1 aimed to assess the safety and clinical activity of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy with two B-cell maturation antigen-targeting single-domain antibodies, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma with poor prognosis. Methods This single-arm, open-label, phase 1b/2 study done at 16 centres in the USA enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, who received 3 or more previous lines of therapy or were double-refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug, and had received a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 antibody. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0·75 × 106 CAR-positive viable T cells per kg) was administered 5–7 days after start of lymphodepletion. The primary endpoints were safety and confirmation of the recommended phase 2 dose (phase 1b), and overall response rate (phase 2) in all patients who received treatment. Key secondary endpoints were duration of response and progression-free survival. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03548207. Findings Between July 16, 2018, and Oct 7, 2019, 113 patients were enrolled. 97 patients (29 in phase 1b and 68 in phase 2) received a cilta-cel infusion at the recommended phase 2 dose of 0·75 × 106 CAR-positive viable T cells per kg. As of the Sept 1, 2020 clinical cutoff, median follow-up was 12·4 months (IQR 10·6–15·2). 97 patients with a median of six previous therapies received cilta-cel. Overall response rate was 97% (95% CI 91·2–99·4; 94 of 97 patients); 65 (67%) achieved stringent complete response; time to first response was 1 month (IQR 0·9–1·0). Responses deepened over time. Median duration of response was not reached (95% CI 15·9–not estimable), neither was progression-free survival (16·8–not estimable). The 12-month progression-free rate was 77% (95% CI 66·0–84·3) and overall survival rate was 89% (80·2–93·5). Haematological adverse events were common; grade 3–4 haematological adverse events were neutropenia (92 [95%] of 97 patients), anaemia (66 [68%]), leukopenia (59 [61%]), thrombocytopenia (58 [60%]), and lymphopenia (48 [50%]). Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 92 (95%) of 97 patients (4% were grade 3 or 4); with median time to onset of 7·0 days (IQR 5–8) and median duration of 4·0 days (IQR 3–6). Cytokine release syndrome resolved in all except one with grade 5 cytokine release syndrome and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. CAR T-cell neurotoxicity occurred in 20 (21%) patients (9% were grade 3 or 4). 14 deaths occurred in the study; six due to treatment-related adverse events, five due to progressive disease, and three due to treatment-unrelated adverse events. Interpretation A single cilta-cel infusion at the target dose of 0·75 × 106 CAR-positive viable T cells per kg led to early, deep, and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma with a manageable safety profile. The data from this study formed the basis for recent regulatory submissions. Funding Janssen Research & Development and Legend Biotech.

Background: The phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study (NCT03548207) is evaluating ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; JNJ-68284528; LCAR-B38M CAR-T cells), a chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy with 2 B-cell maturation antigen-targeting single-domain antibodies, in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), a known side effect of CAR-T therapy, can be mild to life-threatening and requires careful monitoring and management. Here, we analyzed CRS and cytokine profiles in CARTITUDE-1. Methods: Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) had a diagnosis of MM per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, received ≥3 prior regimens or were double-refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug, and received an anti-CD38 antibody. Bridging therapy was permitted after apheresis. At 5-7 days prior to cilta-cel infusion, lymphodepletion was performed with cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2 daily for 3 days. Cilta-cel was administered as a single infusion at a target dose of 0.75×106 (range: 0.5-1.0×106) CAR+ viable T cells/kg. CRS was graded using Lee et al (Blood 2014) in the phase 1b portion and American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) in the phase 2 portion. In this combined analysis, Lee et al criteria were mapped to ASTCT criteria for patients in the phase 1b portion. Serum samples for cytokine profiling were collected prior to lymphodepletion, prior to cilta-cel infusion and 2 hours post-infusion on Day 1, at regular time points until Day 100, and if CRS was suspected or reported. Results: A total of 97 patients with R/R MM were treated with cilta-cel; median follow-up for this analysis was 8.8 months (range: 1.5-20.4). CRS was reported in 92 (94.8%) patients. A total of 48 (49.5%) patients had grade 1 CRS, 38 (39.2%) had grade 2, 4 (4.1%) had grade 3, and 1 had grade 5 (1.0%); maximum toxicity grade according to the ASTCT consensus grading system could not be derived for 1 patient with CRS in the phase 1b portion. Median time to CRS onset from cilta-cel infusion was 7.0 days (range: 1-12). Median duration of CRS was 4.0 days (range: 1-27, excluding n=1 with 97 days). Supportive measures to treat CRS or CRS symptoms were administered to 87 (89.7%) patients, most commonly tocilizumab (69.1%), acetaminophen (68.0%), corticosteroids (20.6%), and anakinra (18.6%). CRS resolved in 91 (98.9%) patients; the patient with grade 5 CRS/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis died on Day 99 subsequent to sequelae of grade 4 CRS. Across all patients, levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, and interferon-γ peaked at Days 7-14 post-cilta-cel infusion. Conclusions: CRS after cilta-cel treatment was low grade and manageable in most patients with R/R MM. The low rate of grade ≥3 CRS, median time to CRS onset of 7.0 days, and median duration of 4.0 days suggests outpatient dosing of cilta-cel may be feasible; this approach is being explored in the phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 study (NCT04133636). Disclosures Lin: Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vineti: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Martin:Janssen: Research Funding; AMGEN: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy. Cohen:Novartis: Other: Patents/Intellectual property licensed, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jakubowiak:AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive, Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Usmani:Celgene: Other; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SkylineDX: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Madduri:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; Foundation Medicine: Consultancy, Honoraria; Legend: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kinevant: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau. Stewart:Janssen, BMS, Sanofi-Aventis, GSK: Honoraria; Tempus, Inc., Genomics England LLC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Singh:Janssen: Current Employment. Zudaire:Janssen: Current Employment. Yeh:Janssen: Current Employment. Allred:Janssen: Current Employment. Olyslager:Janssen: Current Employment. Banerjee:Janssen: Current Employment. Goldberg:Johnson & Johnson: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Schecter:Janssen: Current Employment. Jackson:Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Consultancy; Janssen: Current Employment. Deraedt:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Geng:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Wu:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Carrasco:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Akram:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Hossain:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Wang:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Berdeja:CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; EMD Sorono: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy; Vivolux: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Kesios: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellularity: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Glenmark: Research Funding; CURIS: Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; Lilly: Research Funding. Jagannath:BMS, Janssen, Karyopharm, Legend Biotech, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy.

Introduction: There are several treatment options for patients (pts) with progressive multiple myeloma (MM) who are refractory to lenalidomide but most pts relapse shortly after receiving salvage treatment. Cilta-cel is a CAR-T therapy expressing 2 BCMA-targeting, single-domain antibodies that demonstrated early, deep, and durable responses in pts with MM who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy (LOT) in the phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study (Berdeja, Lancet, 2021). The multicohort, open-label, phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 study (NCT04133636) is evaluating cilta-cel safety and efficacy in various clinical settings for pts with MM and exploring suitability of outpatient administration. Initial analysis (median follow-up 5.8 mo) of pts in CARTITUDE-2 cohort A (lenalidomide-refractory with 1-3 prior LOT) demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 95%, with 75% of pts achieving complete response or better (≥CR) and 85% achieving very good partial response or better (≥VGPR). Here, we present updated results for this population. Methods: Pts had progressive MM after 1-3 prior LOT, including a PI and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), were lenalidomide-refractory, and had no prior exposure to BCMA-targeting agents. Bridging therapy was allowed after apheresis. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75×10 6 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) was given 5-7 d after start of lymphodepletion (daily cyclophosphamide [300 mg/m 2] and fludarabine [30 mg/m 2] for 3 d). The primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10 -5. Secondary endpoints were ORR, duration of response (DOR), time and duration of MRD negativity, and incidence and severity of AEs. MRD was assessed by next-generation sequencing, response was assessed per IMWG criteria, and adverse events (AEs) were graded using CTCAEv5.0 (CRS and ICANS by ASTCT). Results: Initial results from this cohort were published at ASCO 2021 . Here we report data as of the April 15, 2021, data cutoff (median follow-up 9.7 mo: range 3.3-13.4) . 20 pts (65% male; median age 60 years [range 38-75]) received cilta-cel; 1 pt was treated in an outpatient setting. Pts received a median of 2 prior LOT (range 1-3); 60% received 1 or 2 prior LOT and 40% received 3 prior LOT. All pts were exposed to a PI, IMiD, and dexamethasone, 95% to alkylating agents, and 65% to daratumumab. In all, 95% of pts were refractory to the last LOT; 40% were triple-class refractory. ORR was 95% (95% CI 75.1-99.9); 85% (95% CI 62.1-96.8) of pts had ≥CR, and 95% (95% CI 75.1-99.9) had ≥VGPR (Figure). Median time to first response was 1.0 mo (range 0.7-3.3); median time to best response was 3.3 mo (range 0.9-7.9); median time to ≥CR was 2.6 mo (range 0.9-7.9). Median DOR was not reached; 6-mo PFS rate was 90% (95% CI 65.6-97.4). Of MRD-evaluable pts (n=13), 92.3% (95% CI 64.0-99.8) were MRD-negative at 10 -5. Hematologic AEs in ≥20% of pts were neutropenia (95%; grade [gr] 3/4: 95%), thrombocytopenia (80%; gr 3/4: 35%), anemia (75%; gr 3/4: 45%), lymphopenia (65%; gr 3/4: 60%) and leukopenia (55%; gr 3/4: 55%). CRS occurred in 95% of pts (gr 3/4: 10%). Median time to CRS onset was 7 d (range 5-9), with a median duration of 4 d (range 2-11). CRS resolved within 7 d in 90% of pts. CAR T-cell neurotoxicity occurred in 4 pts (20%; all gr 1/2). Three pts (15%) had ICANS (all gr 1/2); median time to onset was 8 d (range 7-10) and median duration was 3 d (range 1-3). One pt had other neurotoxicities (gr 2 facial paralysis); time to onset was 29 d with a duration of 51 d. No movement and neurocognitive TEAEs were observed. One death occurred due to COVID-19 (assessed as treatment-related by the investigator). Safety profile was manageable in the pt treated in an outpatient setting. Conclusions: At a longer median follow-up of 9.7 mo, a single cilta-cel infusion led to early and deep responses in pts with MM who had 1-3 prior LOT and were lenalidomide-refractory. ORR in this cohort was consistent with the CARTITUDE-1 study in heavily pretreated pts; responses deepened over time, with 92% of MRD-evaluable pts achieving MRD 10 -5 negativity. The safety profile was manageable; CRS was mostly gr 1/2, and no movement and neurocognitive TEAEs occurred, suggesting the efficacy of monitoring and pt management strategies that were implemented across phase 2/3 studies in the CARTITUDE program. Follow-up is ongoing, including additional enrollment in this cohort; this pt population is being further evaluated in the CARTITUDE-4 study (NCT04181827). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cohen: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Research Funding; neopharm / promedico: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cohen: Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy. Delforge: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hillengass: Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beijing Medical Award Foundation: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beijing Life Oasis Public Service Center: Speakers Bureau; Curio Science: Speakers Bureau; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Axxess Network: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Skyline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Goldschmidt: GSK: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Johns Hopkins University: Other: Grant; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Foundation: Other: Grant; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weisel: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Raab: Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scheid: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schecter: Janssen: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. De Braganca: Janssen: Current Employment. Varsos: Janssen: Current Employment. Yeh: Janssen: Current Employment. Vogel: Janssen Global Services, LLC: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Corsale: Janssen: Current Employment. Akram: Legend Biotech USA: Current Employment. Pacaud: Legend Biotech: Current Employment. Nesheiwat: Legend Biotech USA: Current Employment. Einsele: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: At the time of abstract submission, cilta-cel is being investigated for the treatment of multiple myeloma but is not yet approved.

Introduction: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy with 2 B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting single-domain antibodies, is being evaluated in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In the phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 (NCT03548207) study, a single dose of cilta-cel led to early, deep, and durable responses in heavily pretreated pts with MM, with a manageable safety profile (Berdeja, Lancet, 2021). At median 18 months of follow-up, the overall response rate (ORR) was 98%, with 80% of pts achieving stringent complete response. Median duration of response (DOR) was 21.8 months (95% CI, 21.8-not estimable); 18-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 66% and 81%, respectively. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of cilta-cel in various subgroups of pts in CARTITUDE-1. Methods: Eligible pts had MM and received ≥3 prior lines of therapy (LOT) or were double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and had received a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 antibody. After apheresis, bridging therapy was permitted. Pts received a single cilta-cel infusion (target dose: 0.75×10 6 CAR+ viable T cells/kg; range 0.5-1.0×10 6) 5-7 days after lymphodepletion (300 mg/m 2 cyclophosphamide, 30 mg/m 2 fludarabine daily for 3 days). Primary objectives were to characterize cilta-cel safety, confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (phase 1b), and evaluate efficacy (phase 2). In this combined phase 1b and phase 2 analysis, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) graded by Lee et al (Blood 2014) criteria and neurotoxicity by CTCAE v5.0 were mapped to the ASTCT criteria for CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS), respectively. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in the following subgroups: ≥65 years of age, Black/African American, 3 prior LOT, ≥4 prior LOT, triple-class refractory, penta-drug refractory, standard- and high-risk cytogenetics, International Staging System stage III, bone marrow plasma cells at baseline (≤30%, >30 to Results: As of February 11, 2021, 97 pts in the overall population received cilta-cel; 58.8% were male, median age was 61 years (range 43-78), and median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 5.9 years (range 1.6-18.2). ORR across all evaluated subgroups was comparable to the overall population, and was consistently high (range 95.1-100%) including in those with high-risk cytogenetics, ISS stage III MM, baseline bone marrow cells ≥60%, and baseline plasmacytomas (Table). Median DOR for most subgroups, including high-risk cytogenetics, was consistent with the overall population or not reached but was shorter in pts with ISS Stage III MM and baseline plasmacytomas (Table). Across all subgroups, 80%-100% of MRD-evaluable pts achieved MRD negativity (10 -5 threshold). 18-month PFS and OS rates were consistent with the overall population in most subgroups, including high-risk cytogenetics, and lower in ISS stage III and baseline plasmacytomas (Table). Incidence of CRS, ICANS, and other CAR T-cell neurotoxicities (events not reported as ICANS [ie, onset after a period of recovery from CRS and ICANS]) in various subgroups was consistent with the overall population, with no new safety signals. Conclusions: At median follow-up of 18 months, a single infusion of cilta-cel yielded deep, durable responses in all evaluated subgroups in CARTITUDE-1. An ORR of 95%-100% was observed in pts across all subgroups, including those with high-risk cytogenetics, ISS stage III MM, baseline bone marrow cells ≥60%, and baseline plasmacytomas. In patients with ISS stage III and with baseline plasmacytomas, median DOR appeared shorter and 18-mo PFS and OS rates lower. Cilta-cel safety profile across the subgroups was consistent with the overall population, with no new safety signals. Ongoing evaluation of cilta-cel in the multicohort CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) study in pts with unmet need in varying stages of treatment for MM will further explore the treatment benefit of cilta-cel, including in those with high-risk disease. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jakubowiak: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gracell: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Usmani: Janssen Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; SkylineDX: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EdoPharma: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Berdeja: Bluebird bio, BMS, Celgene, CRISPR Therapeutics, Janssen, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech, SecuraBio, Takeda: Consultancy; GSK, Ichnos Sciences, Incyte: Research Funding; EMD Sorono, Genentech: Research Funding; Celularity, CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding; Lilly, Novartis: Research Funding; Abbvie, Acetylon, Amgen: Research Funding; Poseida, Sanofi, Teva: Research Funding. Cohen: Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Hari: Karyopharm: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene-BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Schecter: Janssen: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Yeh: Janssen: Current Employment. Olyslager: Janssen: Current Employment. Banerjee: Janssen: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Jackson: Janssen: Current Employment; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Consultancy. Allred: Janssen: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Zudaire: Janssen: Current Employment. Deraedt: Janssen: Current Employment. Geng: Legend Biotech USA: Current Employment. Pacaud: Legend Biotech: Current Employment. Lin: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vineti: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Sorrento: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Consultancy. Martin: Janssen: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Jagannath: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: At the time of abstract submission, cilta-cel is being investigated for the treatment of multiple myeloma but is not yet approved.

Introduction: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy with 2 B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) targeting single-domain antibodies, demonstrated early, deep, and durable responses in the phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had been heavily pretreated (Berdeja, Lancet, 2021). After a median follow-up of 12.4 months, the overall response rate (ORR; as assessed by independent review committee) was 97%, with 67% of pts achieving stringent complete response (sCR). The 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 77% and 89%, respectively. Here, we report updated results from CARTITUDE-1 with longer duration of follow-up (median 18 months). Methods: Eligible pts had MM and received ≥3 prior therapies or were refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and had received a PI, IMiD, and an anti-CD38 antibody. After apheresis, bridging therapy was permitted. Pts received a single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75×10 6 CAR+ viable T cells/kg; range 0.5-1.0×10 6) 5-7 days (d) after lymphodepletion (300 mg/m 2 cyclophosphamide, 30 mg/m 2 fludarabine daily for 3 d). Primary objectives were to characterize cilta-cel safety, confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (phase 1b), and evaluate cilta-cel efficacy (phase 2). Response was assessed per IMWG criteria by an independent review committee and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10 -5 by next-generation sequencing. In this combined phase 1b and phase 2 analysis, cytokine release syndrome (CRS; per Lee et al Blood 2014 grading criteria) and neurotoxicity (by CTCAE v5.0) were mapped to the ASTCT criteria for CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS), respectively. Results: As of Feb 11, 2021, 97 pts (58.8% male; median age 61.0 years [range 43-78]) received cilta-cel. Pts had received a median of 6 (range 3-18) prior lines of therapy; 83.5% were penta-drug exposed, 87.6% were triple-class refractory, 42.3% were penta-drug refractory, and 99.0% were refractory to last line of therapy. ORR was 97.9% (95% CI: 92.7-99.7); 80.4% of pts achieved sCR, and 94.8% achieved very good partial response or better (Figure). The median time to first response was 1 month (range 0.9-10.7), median time to best response was 2.6 months (range 0.9-15.2), and median time to complete response or better was 2.6 months (range 0.9-15.2). The median duration of response was 21.8 months (95% CI: 21.8-not estimable). Of 61 pts evaluable for MRD, 91.8% were MRD negative at the 10 -5 threshold; MRD 10 -5 negativity was sustained for ≥6 months in 44.3% (27/61) of pts and ≥12 months in 18% (11/61) of pts. The 18-month PFS and OS rates were 66.0% (95% CI: 54.9-75.0) and 80.9% (95% CI: 71.4-87.6), respectively. 18-month PFS rates in pts who achieved sustained MRD for ≥6 months and ≥12 months were 96.3% (95% CI: 76.5-99.5) and 100%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic AEs in ≥25% of pts were neutropenia (94.8%), anemia (68.0%), leukopenia (60.8%), thrombocytopenia (59.8%), and lymphopenia (49.5%). There were no fatalities related to cytopenias, and no new safety signals with longer follow-up. CRS occurred in 94.8% of pts (mostly grade 1/2); median time to onset was 7 d (range 1-12), and CRS resolved within 14 d in 98.9% of pts. There was no new CAR T-cell neurotoxicity since the previous report. Post cilta-cel infusion, 21 deaths occurred during the study: 0 within first 30 d, 2 within 100 d, and 19 more than 100 d post infusion. Ten deaths were due to disease progression, 6 were treatment-related (as assessed by the investigator), and 5 were due to AEs unrelated to treatment. One patient was retreated with cilta-cel (for progressive disease) and had stable disease (per computerized algorithm) post-retreatment with no incidence of CAR T-cell neurotoxicity. Conclusions: At a longer median follow-up of 18 months, a single cilta-cel infusion led to early, deep, and durable responses in heavily pre-treated pts with MM. Follow-up is ongoing and updated data will be presented. Cilta-cel demonstrated a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals observed with longer follow-up. Further investigations of cilta-cel are ongoing in earlier lines of therapy (CARTITUDE-2 [NCT04133636], CARTITUDE-4 [NCT04181827], and CARTITUDE-5 [NCT04923893]) and in outpatient settings. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Martin: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Usmani: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; SkylineDX: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; EdoPharma: Consultancy; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy. Berdeja: Lilly, Novartis: Research Funding; Poseida, Sanofi, Teva: Research Funding; GSK, Ichnos Sciences, Incyte: Research Funding; Bluebird bio, BMS, Celgene, CRISPR Therapeutics, Janssen, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech, SecuraBio, Takeda: Consultancy; Celularity, CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding; Abbvie, Acetylon, Amgen: Research Funding; EMD Sorono, Genentech: Research Funding. Jakubowiak: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gracell: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cohen: Novartis: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hari: Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene-BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Avigan: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Partner Tx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aviv MedTech Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Legend Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Parexcel: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Deol: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy. Lesokhin: bristol myers squibb: Research Funding; Iteos: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Behringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Trillium Therapeutics: Consultancy; Serametrix, Inc: Patents & Royalties; Genetech: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Munshi: Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: scientific founder, Patents & Royalties; Legend: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. O'Donnell: Onocopeptide: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Stewart: Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Skyline diagnostics: Consultancy; Genomcs England: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tempus Inc.: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PikSci Inc.: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Patents & Royalties; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria. Schecter: Janssen: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Goldberg: Janssen: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Jackson: Janssen: Current Employment; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Consultancy. Yeh: Janssen: Current Employment. Banerjee: Janssen: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Allred: Janssen: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Zudaire: Janssen: Current Employment. Deraedt: Janssen: Current Employment. Olyslager: Janssen: Current Employment. Pacaud: Legend Biotech: Current Employment. Lin: Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vineti: Consultancy; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jagannath: Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: At the time of abstract submission, cilta-cel is being investigated for the treatment of multiple myeloma but is not yet approved.

Objectives CARTITUDE-1 (NCT03548207) is a phase 1b/2 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; JNJ-68284528), a chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy with two B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–targeting single-domain antibodies, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Updated results from a median 18-month follow-up are reported here. Material and methods Eligible patients had MM, received ≥3 prior regimens or were double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and had received a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 antibody. After apheresis, bridging therapy was allowed. Patients received a single cilta-cel infusion (target dose: 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg; range 0.5-1.0×106) 5–7 days (d) after lymphodepletion (300 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 30 mg/m2 fludarabine daily for 3 d). Primary objectives were to characterize cilta-cel safety, confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (phase 1b), and evaluate efficacy (phase 2). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded by Lee et al (Blood 2014) and neurotoxicity by CTCAE, v5.0 in phase 1b. CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded by American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) criteria in phase 2. Lee et al and CTCAE v5.0 were mapped to ASTCT for CRS and ICANS, respectively. Results As of February 11, 2021, 97 patients (median of 6 prior lines) received cilta-cel. Overall response rate per independent review committee (primary endpoint) was 97.9% (95% CI, 92.7–99.7); 80.4% achieved stringent complete response (sCR) and 94.8% achieved very good partial response or better. Median time to first response was 1 month (mo) (range, 0.9–10.7), and median time to ≥CR was 2.6 mo (range, 0.9–15.2). Median duration of response was 21.8 mo (95% CI, 21.8–NE). Of 61 minimal residual disease (MRD)-evaluable patients, 91.8% were MRD negative at 10−5. The 18-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates (95% CI) were 66% (54.9–75.0) and 80.9% (71.4–87.6), respectively; median PFS was 22.8 mo (95% CI, 22.8–NE) for all patients, and not reached for patients with sCR. Grade 3/4 hematologic AEs ≥20% included neutropenia (95%), anemia (68%), leukopenia (61%), thrombocytopenia (60%), and lymphopenia (50%). CRS occurred in 95% of patients (4% grade 3/4); median time to onset was 7 d (range, 1–12) and median duration was 4 d (range, 1–14, excluding 1 patient with 97-d duration). CRS resolved in all but one with grade 5 CRS/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. 21% of patients had CAR-T neurotoxicity (grade ≥3, 10%). Twenty-one deaths occurred during the study: none ≤30 days; 2 ≤100 days; and 19 >100 days after infusion, among which, 10 were due to disease progression, 6 were treatment-related as assessed by the investigator, and 5 were due to AEs unrelated to treatment. Discussion Cilta-cel is under further investigation in other MM populations in earlier lines of therapy and in outpatient settings. Conclusions At a longer median follow-up of 18 mo, a single cilta-cel infusion yielded early, deep, and durable responses with a manageable safety, in heavily pretreated patients with MM.

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and with each relapse, patients with MM experience further declines in HRQoL. Patient-reported HRQoL is therefore an important treatment outcome, in addition to clinical response to therapy. CARTITUDE-1 (NCT03548207) is a phase 1b/2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; JNJ-68284528; LCAR-B38M CAR-T cells), a chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy with 2 B-cell maturation antigen-targeting single-domain antibodies, in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM. We evaluated symptoms, functioning, and overall HRQoL through patient-reported outcome measures, which is a secondary objective of CARTITUDE-1. Methods: Patients were ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of MM per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Patients had received ≥3 prior regimens for MM or were double-refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug, and had received an anti-CD38 antibody. Cilta-cel was given as a single infusion on Day 1 (target dose: 0.75×106 [range: 0.5-1.0×106] CAR+ viable T cells/kg) 5-7 days after start of lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 + fludarabine 30 mg/m2 daily for 3 days). In the phase 2 portion of CARTITUDE-1, HRQoL was assessed at baseline, on Days 7, 28, 56, 78, and 100, and every 28 days thereafter using 3 patient-reported instruments: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), 4 items from the EORTC QLQ-Multiple Myeloma (MY20) module, and the 5-level EuroQol Five Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) measure. Raw EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-MY20 scores were linearly transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100; the EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS) score ranges from 0 to 100. Clinically meaningful changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 symptoms, physical functioning, and overall HRQoL were based on anchor-based methods using a patient global impression of change item. Repeated-measures mixed-effects models were used to analyze mean changes in HRQoL from baseline to subsequent assessment time points in patients in the modified intent-to-treat population with ≥1 post-baseline assessment. Median time to event of HRQoL scores was calculated descriptively, using a change in score ≥0.5×standard deviation of values prior to cilta-cel infusion as improvement/worsening with death due to progression defined as worsening. Results: For the 68 patients in the phase 2 portion of CARTITUDE-1 (63.2% male; median age: 62.0 years [range: 43-78]), questionnaire completion rates at baseline and Day 100, respectively, were 92.6% and 69.2% for both the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-MY20 items and 92.6% and 70.8% for the EQ-5D-5L. For EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, clinically meaningful improvements at Day 100 were seen for 71.1% of patients for pain, 62.2% for fatigue, 72.1% for physical functioning, and 51.1% for global health status. Mean changes in pain and fatigue showed a reduction in these symptoms over time (following an initial worsening of fatigue at Day 7; Figure). This trend of improvements over time was also observed for overall HRQoL and EORTC QLQ-MY20 single items. Clinically meaningful improvements at Day 100, defined by a literature-based minimal important difference of 10 points in mean score, were observed for the EORTC QLQ-MY20 single items: thinking about illness and worries about dying or future health. Approximately 50% of the population reported an event of improvement or worsening in EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L scales, with the rest censored in this early data cut; among these patients, median time to improvement was approximately 1-2 months (with median time to worsening occurring less than 1 month after cilta-cel treatment). There was a trend for an improvement in mean EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status, physical functioning, pain, and fatigue, and EQ-5D-5L VAS at Day 100 with increased depth of response. Conclusions: Some patients with heavily pretreated MM showed rapid and clinically meaningful improvements in pain, fatigue, physical functioning, overall HRQoL, and future perspectives, consistent with their clinical outcomes. With additional follow-up, it is possible that these early improvements in symptoms will translate into greater improvement in overall HRQoL in the long term. Disclosures Martin: Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; AMGEN: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy. Lin:Vineti: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cohen:Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Patents/Intellectual property licensed, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Htut:City of Hope Medical Center: Current Employment. Stewart:Janssen, BMS, Sanofi-Aventis, GSK: Honoraria; Tempus, Inc., Genomics England LLC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hari:GSK: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Berdeja:Teva: Research Funding; Cellularity: Research Funding; Kesios: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; CURIS: Research Funding; EMD Sorono: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Glenmark: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vivolux: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy. Madduri:Foundation Medicine: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Legend: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; Kinevant: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Usmani:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; SkylineDX: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Other; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding. Yeh:Janssen: Current Employment. Allred:Janssen: Current Employment. Olyslager:Janssen: Current Employment. Banerjee:Janssen: Current Employment. Goldberg:Johnson & Johnson: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Schecter:Janssen: Current Employment. Jackson:Janssen: Current Employment; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Consultancy. Deraedt:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gries:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fastenau:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wu:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Carrasco:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Akram:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Hossain:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Jakubowiak:AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive, Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jagannath:BMS, Janssen, Karyopharm, Legend Biotech, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy.

8005 Background: CARTITUDE-1 (NCT03548207) is a phase 1b/2 study evaluating ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; JNJ-68284528), a CAR T-cell therapy with two BCMA–targeting single-domain antibodies, in patients (pts) with R/R MM. Here, we report updated results in pts with a longer duration (median 12.4 months) of follow-up. Methods: Eligible pts had MM and received ≥3 prior regimens or were double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and had received a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 antibody. After apheresis, bridging therapy was permitted. Pts received a single cilta-cel infusion (target dose: 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg; range 0.5-1.0×106) 5–7 days (d) after lymphodepletion (300 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 30 mg/m2 fludarabine daily for 3 d). The primary objectives were to characterize cilta-cel safety, confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; phase 1b), and evaluate efficacy (phase 2). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded by Lee et al (Blood 2014) and neurotoxicity by CTCAE, v5.0 (in phase 1b). CRS and ICANS were graded by ASTCT criteria (in phase 2). Here, Lee et al and CTCAE v5.0 were mapped to ASTCT for CRS and ICANS, respectively. Results: As of Sept 1, 2020, 97 pts with a median of 6 prior lines received cilta-cel. Overall response rate per independent review committee (primary endpoint) was 97% (95% CI, 91–99), with 67% achieving stringent complete response (sCR). Median time to first response was 1 month (range, 1–9), and median time to CR or better was 2 months (range, 1–15). Responses deepened over time, and median duration of response was not reached. Of 57 pts evaluable for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment, 93% were MRD-negative at 10-5. The 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates (95% CI) were 77% (66–84) and 89% (80–94), respectively; median PFS was not reached. Grade 3/4 hematologic AEs ≥20% included neutropenia (95%), anemia (68%), leukopenia (61%), thrombocytopenia (60%), and lymphopenia (50%). CRS occurred in 95% of pts (4% grade 3/4), with median time to onset of 7 d (range, 1–12), and median duration of 4 d (range, 1–14, excluding 1 pt with 97-d duration). CRS resolved in all but one with grade 5 CRS/haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. CAR T-cell neurotoxicity occurred in 21% of pts (grade ≥3, 10%). Fourteen deaths occurred during the study after cilta-cel infusion: none within the first 30 days, 2 within 100 days; and 12 more than 100 days post infusion, of which 5 were due to disease progression, and 4 due to treatment-related AEs. Conclusions: A single infusion of cilta-cel yielded early, deep, and durable responses in heavily pretreated pts with MM, with a manageable safety profile at the RP2D. Cilta-cel is under further investigation in other MM populations in earlier lines of therapy and in outpatient settings. Clinical trial information: NCT03548207.

Shear wave elastography relies on acoustic radiation force to generate shear wave vibration. In magnetomotive ultrasound (MMUS), magnetic excitation along with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) induces magneto-vibration. Both types of tissue vibrations are in the range of few micrometers and not observable in conventional B-mode imaging. Computationally intensive sub-wavelength motion tracking is required to visualize the shear wave propagation for shear wave speed estimation and to localize magneto-vibration sources for mapping MNP distribution. In this study, we propose a novel vibration visualization technique — B-mode subwavelength vibration (B-SV) imaging, which can reveal such invisible vibrations in B-mode images without the need of sub-wavelength motion estimation. Simulations and MMUS experimental data (not shown here) are used to verify the proposed technique. From the results it is easy to locate the vibration source and visualize the shear wave in B-mode images, using the proposed B-SV imaging technique. The proposed B-SV imaging technique provides straightforward B-mode visualization of the originally invisible vibrations. It is expected that the proposed B-SV imaging would be beneficial to the shear wave elastography and MMUS.

For clinical trials with time-to-event as the primary endpoint, the clinical cutoff is often event-driven and the log-rank test is the most commonly used statistical method for evaluating treatment effect. However, this method relies on the proportional hazards assumption in that it has the maximal power in this circumstance. In certain disease areas or populations, some patients can be curable and never experience the events despite a long follow-up. The event accumulation may dry out after a certain period of follow-up and the treatment effect could be reflected as the combination of improvement of cure rate and the delay of events for those uncurable patients. Study power depends on both cure rate improvement and hazard reduction. In this paper, we illustrate these practical issues using simulation studies and explore sample size recommendations, alternative ways for clinical cutoffs, and efficient testing methods with the highest study power possible.

JNJ-68284528 (JNJ-4528) is a chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy containing two BCMA-targeting single-domain antibodies designed to confer avidity. A first-in-human phase 1 study (LEGEND-2) conducted in China of LCAR-B38M, an identical CAR to JNJ-4528, showed high overall response and manageable safety in 74 patients (pts) with R/R MM. Phase 1b results from the ongoing CARTITUDE-1 study conducted in the US with JNJ-4528 are presented here (NCT03548207). Eligible pts (≥18 years) were diagnosed with MM per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, had measurable disease as assessed by M-protein or serum free light chain levels, received ≥3 prior regimens or were double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and received an anti-CD38 antibody. Bridging therapy was allowed after apheresis. Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 and fludarabine 30 mg/m2 over 3 days were used as the conditioning regimen. A single infusion of JNJ-4528 at the targeted 0.75x106 CAR+ cells/kg (target range 0.5-1.0x106) dose was administered 5-7 days after the start of the conditioning regimen. Primary objectives for phase 1b were to characterize the safety of JNJ-4528 and confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Adverse events (AEs) were graded using CTCAE, v5.0, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) using Lee et al. (Blood 2014;124:188), and neurotoxicity using both CTCAE, v5.0 and the ASTCT grading system (Lee et al.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019 25(4):625). Response was assessed per IMWG criteria, and minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by next generation flow cytometry and/or next generation sequencing. As of 24 Jun 2019, 25 pts had been infused with JNJ-4528 in the phase 1b portion of the study. Median age was 61 years (range 50-75), pts had received a median of 5 (range 3-16) prior lines of treatment, 88% were triple-refractory to a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 antibody, 72% were penta-exposed, and 36% were penta-refractory. The median administered dose was 0.73x106 CAR+ cells/kg (range 0.5-0.9x106). Most frequently reported AEs were CRS (88%), neutropenia (80%), anemia (76%), and thrombocytopenia (72%). Hematologic AEs of grade ≥3 included neutropenia (76%), thrombocytopenia (60%), and anemia (48%). The majority of pts (80%) had grade 1-2 CRS, with 1 grade 3 event and 1 grade 5 event at day 99 from sequalae of grade 4 CRS (dose-limiting toxicity). CRS events had a generally predictable time to onset, occurring at a median of 7 days (range 2-12) post-infusion with a median duration of 4 days (range 1-60). Tocilizumab and corticosteroids were administered in 91% and 27% of pts with CRS (n=22), respectively. Three pts had CAR-T-related neurotoxicity of grade 1 (n=2) and grade 3 (n=1); all events occurred in the context of CRS and resolved within 1-2 days. At data cut-off, 21 pts were evaluable for response (postbaseline evaluation at day 28) with a median follow-up of 3 months (range 1-10). Reduction in tumor burden was observed for all pts (Figure). An overall response rate of 91% was observed, with 4 stringent complete responses (sCRs), 2 CRs, 7 very good partial responses, and 6 partial responses. Of the 15 pts with post-infusion day 28 evaluable bone marrow (BM) samples, 10 were MRD-negative at the 10-5 sensitivity level, 2 at the 10-4 sensitivity level, and 3 had unidentified clones. No pts had progressed at the time of data cutoff. Responses were independent of baseline BCMA expression. JNJ-4528 CAR+ cellular and transgene levels showed expansion and persistence in both blood and BM, with peak expansion 9-14 days after dosing in a majority of pts. All pts showed similar kinetics of decline in soluble BCMA (sBCMA) levels, and continued depletion in sBCMA suggests CAR-T-mediated pharmacodynamic activity. Serum cytokine levels (i.e., IL-6, IFNγ, IL-10) increased post-infusion and peaked around day 10, coinciding with peak expansion of CAR+ T cells. Increases in some proinflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-6) correlated with onset of CRS symptoms. Collectively these results demonstrate that JNJ-4528 at a target dose of 0.75x106 CAR+ cells/kg delivers early and deep responses, including MRD negativity in all evaluable pts tested, with a manageable safety profile in pts with refractory MM. The safety and efficacy results from the ongoing CARTITUDE-1 study are consistent with the LEGEND-2 study and confirm the 0.75x106 CAR+ cells/kg dose as the RP2D for further clinical development. Disclosures Madduri: AbbVie: Consultancy; Foundation Medicine: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Usmani:Amgen Array Biopharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Takeda: Other: Research Grant; Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, SkylineDX, Takeda: Other: Consultant/Advisor. Jagannath:AbbVie: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Merck & Co.: Consultancy. Singh:Janssen R&D: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zudaire:Janssen R&D: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yeh:Janssen R&D: Employment, Equity Ownership. Allred:Janssen R&D: Employment, Equity Ownership. Banerjee:Janssen R&D: Employment, Equity Ownership. Goldberg:Janssen R&D: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schecter:Janssen R&D, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhuang:Janssen R&D: Employment, Equity Ownership. Infante:Janssen R&D: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rizvi:Legend Biotech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fan:Legend Biotech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jakubowiak:Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkyLineDx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; KaryoPharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Berdeja:Amgen Inc, BioClinica, Celgene Corporation, CRISPR Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma Inc, Prothena, Servier, Takeda Oncology: Consultancy; AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bluebird Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene Corporation, Constellation Pharma, Curis Inc, Genentech, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Biotech Inc, Kesios Therapeutics, Lilly, Novartis, Poseida: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding.

Objectives: To estimate neuropathic sign/symptom rates with initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in HIV-infected ART-naive patients, and to investigate risk factors for: peripheral neuropathy and symptomatic peripheral neuropathy (SPN), recoveryfromperipheral neuropathy/SPNafterneurotoxicART(nART) discontinuation, and the absence of peripheral neuropathy/SPN while on nART. Design: AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Longitudinal Linked Randomized Trial participants who initiated cART in randomized trials for ART-naive patients were annually screened for symptoms/signs of peripheral neuropathy. ART use and disease characteristics were collected longitudinally. Methods: Peripheral neuropathy was defined as at least mild loss of vibration sensation in both great toes or absent/hypoactive ankle reflexes bilaterally. SPN was defined as peripheral neuropathy and bilateral symptoms. Generalized estimating equation logistic regression was used to estimate associations. Results: Two thousand, one hundred and forty-one participants were followed from January 2000 to June 2007. Rates of peripheral neuropathy/SPN at 3 years were 32.1/ 8.6% despite 87.1% with HIV-1RNA 400copies/ml or less and 70.3% with CD4 greater than 350cells/ml. Associations with higher odds of peripheral neuropathy included older patient age and current nART use. Associations with higher odds of SPN included older patient age, nART use, and history of diabetes mellitus. Associations with lower odds of recovery after nART discontinuation included older patient age. Associations with higher odds of peripheral neuropathy while on nART included older patient age and current protease inhibitor use. Associations with higher odds of SPN while on nART included older patient age, history of diabetes, taller height, and protease inhibitor use. Conclusion: Signs of peripheral neuropathy remain despite virologic/immunologic control but frequently occurs without symptoms. Aging is a risk factor for peripheral neuropathy/SPN. 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins AIDS 2011, 25:919‐928

Objectives Statins and fibrates alter lipids, apolipoproteins, and inflammatory markers in persons without HIV. The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, and other markers of inflammation with the use of pravastatin and fenofibrate. Design Evaluation of participants in ACTG A5087, a randomized trial of pravastatin 40 mg/day or fenofibrate 200 mg/day for the treatment of dyslipidemia. Participants that failed single-agent therapy at week 12 were given the combination. Methods Participants with available specimens were tested for apolipoproteins A1 and B, adiponectin, plasminogen-activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), P-selectin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). Results A total of 74 participants (37 per randomized arm) received either pravastatin or fenofibrate for 12 weeks with 60 receiving combination treatment from weeks 12 to 48. There were no significant changes in hs-CRP, PAI-1, and P-selectin. From baseline to week 12, the median Apo B levels (−8 mg/dL, P = .01 for fenofibrate and −27 mg/dL, P P P P P P = .01) levels increased. Conclusion Treatment with pravastatin or fenofibrate improves the atherogenic lipid profile within the first 12 weeks and is sustained through 48 weeks with combination therapy. Adiponectin levels decrease with lipid-lowering therapy. However, markers of inflammation and platelet activation were not appreciably changed suggesting that the biologic properties of these agents differ in persons with HIV infection.

Objectives—Antiretroviral Toxic Neuropathy is associated with dideoxy-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor use in HIV, possibly due to mitochondrial toxicity. Acetyl-L-Carnitine (ALC) has been linked to symptomatic improvement in ATN. We present an open-label single-arm pilot study to evaluate change in intra-epidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copies/cell among subjects treated with 3000mg ALC daily. Methods—Punch skin biopsies were examined at baseline and 24 weeks after therapy. Participants reported neuropathic symptoms using the Gracely Pain Intensity Score. Neurological examinations were completed. Results—Twenty-one subjects completed the study. ALC was generally well-tolerated. The IENF density did not change among cases completing 24 weeks of ALC therapy, with median (90% confidence interval (CI)) IENF changes of −1.70 (−3.50, ∞), p=0.98 and 2.15 (−0.10, ∞), p=0.11 for the distal leg and proximal thigh, respectively. Fat mtDNA copies/cell did not change with therapy. Improvements in neuropathic pain (p

Biostatistics is not universally available in colleges/universities and is thus an attractive course to offer via distance education. However, evaluation of the impact of distance education on course enrollment and student success is lacking. We evaluated an “Introduction to Biostatistics” course at Harvard University that offered the distance option (Spring 2005).We assessed the effect on course enrollment and compared the grades of traditional students with non-traditional students, as well as with historical traditional students (Fall 2004). We further compared course evaluations from the inaugural semester with the distance option to evaluations from the prior semester. No evidence of dissimilarities was noted with respect to overall course grade averages or course evaluations. First published November 2007 at Statistics Education Research Journal: Archives

Fatigue is among the most common symptoms reported by HIV-infected individuals. Previous reports suggest that the prevalence of fatigue varies by disease status with rates close to 80% in patients with AIDS. However, most studies have not been conducted in the setting of a controlled trial and have not assessed the association of fatigue with cellular markers of brain activity. Data for this study were derived from baseline and longitudinal evaluations in ACTG A5090, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the Selegiline Transdermal System for the treatment of HIV-associated cognitive impairment. Fatigue was assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale with scores of >4 considered “fatigued”. Participants in a substudy underwent brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) imaging, an in vivo method for assessing brain metabolites associated with neuronal and glia activity. Differences between fatigued and non-fatigued participants were evaluated with respect to demographics and clinical characteristics, plasma and CSF HIV-1 RNA concentration, CD4 counts, and brain metabolites. One hundred and twenty-eight participants were enrolled (88% male, median age = 45 years) and 82 participants (64%, 95% confidence interval 55%, 72%) were fatigued at baseline. MRS was conducted in 62 of the 128 participants. Fatigued participants were significantly younger (p = 0.011), had lower Karnofsky scores (p = 0.032), and had higher levels of depressive symptoms on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale (p < 0.001) than non-fatigued participants. Statistically significant differences between fatigued and non-fatigued groups were not detected for plasma and CSF HIV-1RNA concentration, CD4 counts, or on neuropsychological tests. MRS revealed significantly lower levels of the cellular energy marker total creatine (p = 0.002) in the basal ganglia of fatigued participants. Statistically significant differences in other brain metabolites were not detected. Longitudinal data showed that fatigue persisted and worse fatigue at baseline was predictor of future fatigue. Among the cognitive tests, baseline Stroop score was associated with future fatigue. Fatigue was present in 64% of A5090 study participants and persisted during the 24 weeks of follow-up. Fatigue was associated with worse functional performance and depressive mood. Lower cellular energy levels in the basal ganglia, as measured by MRS total creatine concentration, suggest energy dysmetabolism in this brain region. This observation, taken together with the association between fatigue and neuropsychological tests of frontal lobe performance is consistent with the hypothesis of a striatal–cortical circuitry involvement in the symptoms of fatigue.

To evaluate the effect of vicriviroc (VCV) on peripheral neuropathy (PN), the most prevalent neurological complication of HIV infection in HIV-1-infected treatment- experienced population.A5211 is a randomized placebo- controlled trial evaluating VCV in treatment-experienced HIV participants failing current therapy. Participants were randomized to VCV (5, 10, or 15 mg) or placebo with optimized ritonavir-containing antiretroviral therapy and followed for 48 weeks. PN was defined as having at least mild loss of vibration bilaterally or ankle reflexes absent or hypoactive bilaterally. We estimated the association between VCV (pooled doses) with PN using a logistic generalized estimating equation. Additional outcomes included symptomatic neuropathy (SPN), painful neuropathy (PPN), and neuropathic signs and symptoms.118 participants (92% male, 65% white, median age of 46 years, median baseline CD4 139, median HIV-1 RNA 4.58 log) were randomized (90 on VCV and 28 on placebo). VCV therapy did not result in a statistically significant difference relative to placebo in PN (OR = 1.52; P = .39; 95% CI 0.59, 3.90) after controlling for baseline PN status and baseline neurotoxic nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor(s) use.Treatment with VCV over 48 weeks failed to result in statistically significant effect on PN in treatment-experienced participants with HIV infection relative to placebo, however potentially important effects cannot be ruled out.

To assess the long-term safety (primary aim) and efficacy (secondary aim) of the MAO-B inhibitor Selegiline Transdermal System (STS) for the treatment of HIV-associated cognitive impairment.HIV infection is associated with increased oxidative stress. In vitro and animal studies have shown that selegiline can reduce oxidative stress levels while enhancing the synthesis of neurotrophic factors. We conducted and reported a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with STS in HIV-infected individuals with cognitive impairment (ACTG 5090). We now report the results of the 24-week open-label follow-up.Subjects received either 3 mg/24 h or 6 mg/24 h STS daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was changes in the mean of z scores of six neuropsychological tests (NPZ-6). Additional outcomes included NPZ-8 and NPZ scores by cognitive domain.86 subjects were enrolled. There were few severe adverse experiences (n = 13). There was no significant change in NPZ-6 score, whereas significant changes were observed in NPZ-8 score and several cognitive domains.Long-term use of selegiline was safe and well tolerated in this HIV cohort of HIV with cognitive impairment. Cognitive improvement may be delayed in neuroprotective trials, suggesting that trials longer than 6 months may be necessary to assess the efficacy of putative neuroprotective agents.

TPS8601 Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL) and account for approximately 22% and 10%, respectively, of all NHLs. Althoug...

Secure sharing of digital images is becoming an important issue. Consequently, many schemes for ensuring image sharing security have been proposed. However, existing approaches focus on the sharing of a single image, rather than multiple images. We propose three kinds of sharing methods that progressively reveal n given secret images according to the sensitivity level of each image. Method 1 divides each secret image into n parts and then combines and hides the parts of the images to get n steganographic (stego) JPEG codes of equal importance. Method 2 is similar; however, it allocates different stego JPEG codes of different ‘weights’ to indicate their strength. Method 3 first applies traditional threshold-sharing to the n secret images, then progressively shares k keys, and finally combines the two sharing results to get n stego JPEG codes. In the recovery phase, various parameters are compared to a pre-specified low/middle/high (L/M/H) threshold and, according to the respective method, determine whether or not secret images are reconstructed and the quality of the images reconstructed. The results of experiments conducted verify the efficacy of our methods.