1. Comparison of safety of general anesthesia and intravenous sedation during third-molar extraction surgery
- Author
-
Se-Ung Park, Taewoo Kim, Jiwon Do, Mincheul Cho, Jung-Sub An, and Myong-Hwan Karm
- Subjects
Anesthesia, general ,Anesthesia, intravenous ,Conscious sedation ,Dexmedetomidine ,Safety ,Medicine ,Science - Abstract
Abstract This study compared the safety of general anesthesia (GA) and intravenous sedation (IVS) in patients who underwent extraction of one or more third molars. Data from 1260 patients (GA group, n = 1043; IVS group, n = 217) were retrospectively analyzed, including demographics, preoperative data, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation level), and medications administered intraoperatively and postoperatively. The incidence of intraoperative circulatory variations, surgery and anesthesia durations, postoperative complications, and medication use were assessed and compared. The GA group had longer anesthesia and surgery durations, a higher incidence of hypotension, and a higher frequency of postoperative analgesic use than the IVS group. Dexmedetomidine was the most frequently used sedative agent. The IVS group had a lower incidence of intraoperative hypotension but they had a higher need for vasopressors in the recovery room. Both anesthesia methods maintained satisfactory oxygen saturation levels and sufficient anesthesia throughout the procedure, but they showed different characteristics regarding the duration of surgery and anesthesia duration, hemodynamic stability, and postoperative analgesic needs. IVS may be preferable for patients at risk of cardiovascular complications such as hypotension or tachycardia during surgery.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF