Search

Objectives: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogeneous malignancy with high mortality and dismal prognosis, and an urgent clinical need for new therapies. Knowledge of the CCA epigenome is largely limited to aberrant DNA methylation. Dysregulation of enhancer activities has been identified to affect carcinogenesis and leveraged for new therapies but is uninvestigated in CCA. Our aim is to identify potential therapeutic targets in different subtypes of CCA through enhancer profiling., Design: Integrative multiomics enhancer activity profiling of diverse CCA was performed. A panel of diverse CCA cell lines, patient-derived and cell line-derived xenografts were used to study identified enriched pathways and vulnerabilities. NanoString, multiplex immunohistochemistry staining and single-cell spatial transcriptomics were used to explore the immunogenicity of diverse CCA., Results: We identified three distinct groups, associated with different etiologies and unique pathways. Drug inhibitors of identified pathways reduced tumour growth in in vitro and in vivo models. The first group (ESTRO), with mostly fluke-positive CCAs, displayed activation in estrogen signalling and were sensitive to MTOR inhibitors. Another group (OXPHO), with mostly BAP1 and IDH -mutant CCAs, displayed activated oxidative phosphorylation pathways, and were sensitive to oxidative phosphorylation inhibitors. Immune-related pathways were activated in the final group (IMMUN), made up of an immunogenic CCA subtype and CCA with aristolochic acid (AA) mutational signatures. Intratumour differences in AA mutation load were correlated to intratumour variation of different immune cell populations., Conclusion: Our study elucidates the mechanisms underlying enhancer dysregulation and deepens understanding of different tumourigenesis processes in distinct CCA subtypes, with potential significant therapeutics and clinical benefits., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a targeted molecular therapy used to treat neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). It has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic NETs in several centres in the USA, Europe, and Australia. Tolerability and efficacy data emerging from Asian centres remain few. Epidemiological evidence suggests that there are differences in neuroendocrine neoplasms between the population groups. We aim to describe the treatment and safety outcomes of PRRT in the Asian population., Methods: One hundred and seven (107) patients with metastatic NETs who had undergone PRRT treatment from January 2012 to March 2019 were included in this retrospective study. The response rates using RECIST 1.1 and qualitative analysis were examined. The overall and progression-free survival curves were also evaluated., Results: The median progression-free survival was 49 months. Response assessment after completion of treatment showed that 33 (37.9%) of 87 patients had partial or complete response. Subgroup analysis comparing high- and low-grade NET showed that there was a significant difference in the time to progression curves. Comparison of the number of cycles and progression-free and overall survival also showed a significant difference. Ten patients (9%) had grade 3 or more haematological toxicities. Four patients (4%) had grade 3/4 hepatobiliary toxicities, although the presence of extensive liver metastases was a confounding factor. None of the patients had grade 3/4 acute kidney injury., Conclusion: Our results show that PRRT is safe and effective in the treatment of metastatic NET in the Asian population. There was a significant difference in the progression-free survival curves between low-grade and high-grade NET and in the progression-free and overall survival comparing the number of cycles received., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: To assess large language models on their ability to accurately infer cancer disease response from free-text radiology reports., Materials and Methods: We assembled 10 602 computed tomography reports from cancer patients seen at a single institution. All reports were classified into: no evidence of disease, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease. We applied transformer models, a bidirectional long short-term memory model, a convolutional neural network model, and conventional machine learning methods to this task. Data augmentation using sentence permutation with consistency loss as well as prompt-based fine-tuning were used on the best-performing models. Models were validated on a hold-out test set and an external validation set based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) classifications., Results: The best-performing model was the GatorTron transformer which achieved an accuracy of 0.8916 on the test set and 0.8919 on the RECIST validation set. Data augmentation further improved the accuracy to 0.8976. Prompt-based fine-tuning did not further improve accuracy but was able to reduce the number of training reports to 500 while still achieving good performance., Discussion: These models could be used by researchers to derive progression-free survival in large datasets. It may also serve as a decision support tool by providing clinicians an automated second opinion of disease response., Conclusions: Large clinical language models demonstrate potential to infer cancer disease response from radiology reports at scale. Data augmentation techniques are useful to further improve performance. Prompt-based fine-tuning can significantly reduce the size of the training dataset., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association.)

Recurrence of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC) after liver transplant (LT) is mediated by circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and exacerbated by the immunosuppressants required to prevent graft rejection. To circumvent the effects of immunosuppressants, we developed immunosuppressive drug-resistant armoured HBV-specific T-cell receptor-redirected T cells (IDRA HBV-TCR). However, their ability to eliminate HBV-HCC circulating in the whole blood has never been tested, and whether their lytic efficacy is compatible with the number of adoptively transferred T cells in vivo has never been measured. Hence, we developed a microscopy-based assay to quantify CTCs in whole blood. The assay was then used to quantify the efficacy of IDRA HBV-TCRs to lyse free-floating HBV-HCC cells in the presence of Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF). We demonstrated that a panel of antibodies (AFP, GPC3, Vimentin, pan-Cytokeratin, and CD45) specific for HCC tumour antigens and immune cells can effectively differentiate HCC-CTCs in whole blood. Through dose-titration experiments, we observed that in the presence of immunosuppressive drugs, a minimum of 20 000 IDRA HBV-TCR T cells/ml of whole blood is necessary to lyse ~63.5% of free-floating HBV-HCC cells within 16 hours. In conclusion, IDRA HBV-TCR T cells can lyse free-floating HBV-HCC cells in whole blood in the presence of Tacrolimus and MMF. The quantity of IDRA-HBV TCR T cells required can be achieved by the adoptive transfer of 5 × 10 6 IDRA-HBV TCR-T cells/kg, supporting the utilisation of IDRA HBV-TCR T cells to eliminate CTCs as prophylaxis against recurrence after LT., Competing Interests: S.C.B. owns stock in and receives compensation from X-Zell, a company owning patents and commercialising technologies covering rare-cell detection and characterisation. A.P. is a consultant and shareholder of AIM Biotech Pte. Ltd. A.B. and A.T.T. are the Scientific Founder and the Scientific Consultant of Lion TCR Pte. Ltd, respectively, a biotech company developing T-cell receptors for the treatment of virus-related diseases and cancers. All other authors disclose no conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Immunology.)

Introduction: Sorafenib was historically the standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) until it was superseded by the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Thereafter, several novel first-line combination therapies have demonstrated favorable outcomes. The efficacies of these treatments in relation to current and previous standards of care are unknown, necessitating an overarching evaluation., Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials for phase III randomized controlled trials investigating first-line systemic therapies for aHCC. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were graphically reconstructed to retrieve individual patient-level data. Derived hazard ratios (HRs) for each study were pooled in a random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA). NMAs were also conducted using study-level HRs for various subgroups, according to viral etiology, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, macrovascular invasion, and extrahepatic spread. Treatment strategies were ranked using p scores., Results: Among 4,321 articles identified, 12 trials and 9,589 patients were included for analysis. Only two therapies showed OS benefit over sorafenib: combined anti-programmed-death and anti-VEGF pathway inhibitor monoclonal antibodies (Anti-PD-(L)1/VEGF Ab), including atezolizumab-bevacizumab and sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53-0.76) and tremelimumab-durvalumab (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.66-0.92). Anti-PD-(L)1/VEGF Ab showed OS benefit over all other therapies except tremelimumab-durvalumab. Low heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%) and inconsistency (Cochran's Q = 0.52, p = 0.773) was observed. p scores for OS ranked Anti-PD-(L)1/VEGF Ab as the best treatment in all subgroups, except hepatitis B where atezolizumab-cabozantinib ranked highest for both OS and PFS, as well as nonviral HCC and AFP ≥400 μg/L where tremelimumab-durvalumab ranked highest for OS., Conclusion: This NMA supports Anti-PD-(L)1/VEGF Ab as the first-line therapy for aHCC and demonstrates a comparable benefit for tremelimumab-durvalumab which also extends to certain subgroups. Results of the subgroup analysis may guide treatment according to baseline characteristics, while pending further studies., Competing Interests: Joycelyn Jie Xin Lee has received research funding from Bayer; honoraria for presentations from Ipsen and BMS; and advisory boards with Bayer, Ipsen, Taiho, and Eisai. Stephen Lam Chan has received honoraria from Bayer; has consulting or advisory roles in AstraZeneca/MedImmune, MSD Oncology, and Novartis; speakers' bureau from Amgen, Bayer, and Eisai; and research funding from Novartis and Sirtex Medical. Thomas Yau reports consulting fees from, honoraria from, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exelixis, H3 Biomedicine, Ipsen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, New B Innovation, Novartis, OrigiMed, Pfizer, Sillajen, Sirtex, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. David Wai Meng Tai has received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sirtex, and NMRC Singapore; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Ipsen, Eisai, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; and consulting fees from Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck Sharpe Dohme. Raghav Sundar has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Roche, Taiho, Astra Zeneca, DKSH, and MSD; has advisory activity with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Eisai, Bayer, Taiho, Novartis, MSD, and AstraZeneca; received research funding from MSD and Paxman Coolers; and has received travel grants from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Roche, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. Chow Wei Too has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events and consulting fees from Sirtex., (Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objectives: Epigenomic alterations in cancer interact with the immune microenvironment to dictate tumour evolution and therapeutic response. We aimed to study the regulation of the tumour immune microenvironment through epigenetic alternate promoter use in gastric cancer and to expand our findings to other gastrointestinal tumours., Design: Alternate promoter burden (APB) was quantified using a novel bioinformatic algorithm ( proActiv ) to infer promoter activity from short-read RNA sequencing and samples categorised into APB high , APB int and APB low. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed to analyse the intratumour immune microenvironment. A humanised mouse cancer in vivo model was used to explore dynamic temporal interactions between tumour kinetics, alternate promoter usage and the human immune system. Multiple cohorts of gastrointestinal tumours treated with immunotherapy were assessed for correlation between APB and treatment outcomes., Results: APB high gastric cancer tumours expressed decreased levels of T-cell cytolytic activity and exhibited signatures of immune depletion. Single-cell RNAsequencing analysis confirmed distinct immunological populations and lower T-cell proportions in APB high tumours. Functional in vivo studies using 'humanised mice' harbouring an active human immune system revealed distinct temporal relationships between APB and tumour growth, with APB high tumours having almost no human T-cell infiltration. Analysis of immunotherapy-treated patients with GI cancer confirmed resistance of APB high tumours to immune checkpoint inhibition. APB high gastric cancer exhibited significantly poorer progression-free survival compared with APB low (median 55 days vs 121 days, HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.93, p=0.032)., Conclusion: These findings demonstrate an association between alternate promoter use and the tumour microenvironment, leading to immune evasion and immunotherapy resistance., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The subject matter in this manuscript was submitted as a technology disclosure to the institutional Technology Transfer Office for potential intellectual property protection. PT had stock and other ownership interests in HealthSeq, research funding from Kyowa Hakko Kirin and Thermo Fisher Scientific, and patents/other intellectual property through the Agency for Science and Technology Research, Singapore (all outside the submitted work). RS received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Roche, Taiho, Astra Zeneca, DKSH and MSD; had advisory activity with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck, Bayer, Taiho, Novartis, MSD and AstraZeneca; received research funding from Paxman Coolers and MSD; received travel grants from AstraZeneca, Roche, Eisai and Taiho Pharmaceutical (all outside the submitted work). FP received honoraria for speakers’ bureau/advisory activity from Amgen, Merck-Serono, Roche, Lilly, Sanofi, Bayer and Servier, and received research funding from BMS (all outside the submitted work)., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: This phase 1 study aims to evaluate the tolerability and the recommended phase 2 dose of selinexor in Asian patients with advanced or metastatic malignancies., Experimental Design: A total of 105 patients with advanced malignancies were enrolled from two sites in Singapore (National University Hospital and the National Cancer Centre, Singapore) from 24 February 2014 to 14 January 2019. We investigated four dosing schedules of selinexor in a 3 + 3 dose escalation design with an additional Phase 1b expansion cohort. Adverse events were graded with the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.03. Pharmacodynamic assessments included nuclear cytoplasmic localization of p27, XPO1 cargo proteins pre and post selinexor dosing and pharmacokinetic assessments were conducted at doses between 40 and 60 mg/m 2 ., Results: In our Asian patient cohort, dosing at 40 mg/m 2 given 2 out of 3 weeks, was the most tolerable for our patients. At this dose level, grade 3 adverse events included fatigue (8%), hyponatremia (23%), vomiting (5%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and anaemia (2%). Selinexor had a rapid oral absorption with median T max of 2 h and no PK accumulation after multiple doses of tested regimens. Complete responses were seen in two lymphoma patients. Partial responses were noted in three diffuse large B cell lymphomas, one Hodgkin's lymphoma and thymic carcinoma patient, respectively., Conclusion: Selinexor is tolerated by Asian patients at 40 mg/m 2 twice a week given 2 out of 3 weeks. A 1-week drug holiday was needed as our patients could not tolerate the current approved continuous dosing regimens because of persistent grade 3 fatigue, anorexia and hyponatremia., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: The author declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: D.S.P.T. received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Merck Serono, Tessa Therapeutics, Eisai and Genmab; D.S.P.T. received research funding from AstraZeneca, Bayer and Karyopharm. V.H. received consultancy fees for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, DKSH and Novartis; Stock Ownership: Asian Microbiome Library (AMiLi); the sponsor had no involvement in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), conventional transarterial chemoembolization, drug-eluting embolic transarterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE), transarterial radioembolization, and their combinations with systemic chemotherapy (SCT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases., Methods: A search was conducted on Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science for prospective nonrandomized studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to June 20, 2020. Survival data of patients were recovered from original Kaplan-Meier curves by exploiting a graphical reconstructive algorithm. One-stage meta-analyses were conducted for the median overall survival (OS), survival rates (SRs), and restricted mean survival time (RMST), whereas two-stage meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to determine response rates (RRs) and conversion to resection rates (CRRs)., Results: A total of 71 prospective nonrandomized studies and 21 RCTs were identified, comprising 6,695 patients. Among patients treated beyond the first-line, DEE-TACE + SCT (n = 152) had the best survival outcomes of median OS of 26.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.5-29.1) months and a 3-year RMST of 23.6 (95% CI, 21.8-25.5) months. Upon further stratification by publication year, DEE-TACE + SCT appeared to consistently have the highest pooled SRs at 1 year (81.9%) and 2 years (66.1%) in recent publications (2015-2020). DEE-TACE + SCT and HAI + SCT had the highest pooled RRs of 56.7% (I 2  = 0.90) and 62.6% (I 2  = 0.87) and pooled CRRs of 35.5% (I 2  = 0.00) and 30.3% (I 2  = 0.80), respectively., Conclusions: Albeit significant heterogeneity, the paucity of high-quality evidence, and the noncomparative nature of all analyses, the overall evidence suggests that patients treated with DEE-TACE + SCT have the best oncological outcomes and greatest potential to be converted for resection., (Copyright © 2021 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver cancer globally, claiming nearly 1 million lives each year. The overexpression of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors (FGFRs) signaling cascade has been shown to contribute to tumorigenesis, metastasis, and poor prognosis in HCC. Therefore, targeted inhibition of the FGF/FGFR cascade may represent a new treatment strategy for HCC patients., Methods: HCC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were implanted into either severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) or CD34+hu-NSG (humanized) mice and subsequently treated with vehicle, infigratinib (FGFR1-3 inhibitor), FGF401 (FGFR4 inhibitor), or the combination of infigratinib and FGF401. Tumor progressions, overall survival of mice, lung metastasis, and drug resistance were monitored, and samples collected at the end of the treatment cycle were subjected to Western blot analyses and immunohistochemistry., Results: HCC PDX models expressing high levels of FGF19/FGFR4 or FGFR2/3 showed favorable initial treatment response to FGF401 and infigratinib, respectively. However, progressive disease due to acquired resistance was observed. Combination infigratinib/FGF401 augmented the antitumor activity, response rate, and overall survival of mice. This combination significantly increased the infiltration of B cells, macrophages, CD8+ T cells, and CD4+ T cells associated with granzyme-B-mediated apoptosis, delayed onset of resistance, and inhibited metastasis by potently inhibiting several critical signaling pathways involved in proliferation and metastasis., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that HCC patients with high FGFR2/3 or FGF19/FGFR4 expressing tumors might benefit from a combination infigratinib/FGF401; thus, supporting its evaluation in clinical trials., (© 2021. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver.)

Purpose: Precision oncology has transformed the management of advanced cancers through implementation of advanced molecular profiling technologies to identify increasingly defined subsets of patients and match them to appropriate therapy. We report outcomes of a prospective molecular profiling study in a high-volume Asian tertiary cancer center., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced cancer were enrolled onto a prospective protocol for genomic profiling, the Individualized Molecular Profiling for Allocation to Clinical Trials Singapore study, at the National Cancer Center Singapore. Primary objective was to identify molecular biomarkers in patient's tumors for allocation to clinical trials. The study commenced in February 2012 and is ongoing, with the results of all patients who underwent multiplex next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing until December 2018 presented here. The results were discussed at a molecular tumor board where recommendations for allocation to biomarker-directed trials or targeted therapies were made., Results: One thousand fifteen patients were enrolled with a median age of 58 years (range 20-83 years). Most common tumor types were lung adenocarcinoma (26%), colorectal cancer (15%), and breast cancer (12%). A total of 1,064 NGS assays were performed, on fresh tumor tissue for 369 (35%) and archival tumor tissue for 687 (65%) assays. TP53 (39%) alterations were most common, followed by EGFR (21%), KRAS (14%), and PIK3CA (10%). Of 405 NGS assays with potentially actionable alterations, 111 (27%) were allocated to a clinical trial after molecular tumor board and 20 (4.9%) were enrolled on a molecularly matched clinical trial. Gene fusions were detected in 23 of 311 (7%) patients tested, including rare fusions in new tumor types and known fusions in rare tumors., Conclusion: Individualized Molecular Profiling for Allocation to Clinical Trials Singapore demonstrates the feasibility of a prospective broad molecular profiling program in an Asian tertiary cancer center, with the ability to develop and adapt to a dynamic landscape of precision oncology., Competing Interests: Aaron C. Tan Honoraria: Amgen, Thermo Fisher Scientific Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: ASLAN Pharmaceuticals, Illumina Tira J. Tan Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Immunomedics Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Lilly, Pfizer, DKSH, Novartis Speakers' Bureau: Novartis Research Funding: Bayer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Odonate Therapeutics, Synthon Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Eisai Matthew C. H. Ng Honoraria: MSD Oncology, Taiho Pharmaceutical, ASLAN Pharmaceuticals, Lilly Consulting or Advisory Role: MSD Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck Speakers' Bureau: Lilly Research Funding: ASLAN Pharmaceuticals Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD Oncology, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb David W. M. Tai Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai Speakers' Bureau: Ipsen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Roche Research Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sirtex Medical, Novartis. Justina Y. C. Lam Honoraria: AstraZeneca Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca Research Funding: Bayer, Merus, Bristol Myers Squibb Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Lilly Bien-Soo Tan Research Funding: Boston Scientific Rebecca Alexandra Dent Honoraria: Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Pfizer, Merck, Eisai, AstraZeneca, Novartis Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Pfizer, Amgen, Merck Yoon-Sim Yap Honoraria: Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Eisai, MSD, Inivata Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Eisai, MSD, Inivata Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Lilly, Roche, Novartis Iain B. H. Tan Honoraria: Amgen, Roche, Merck Serono, MSD Consulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Roche, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis Research Funding: MSD Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck Serono, Amgen Su Pin Choo Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Bayer, MSD Oncology, Eisai, Roche Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb Chee-Keong Toh Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Nektar Consulting or Advisory Role: Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Astellas Pharma, MSD Oncology, Roche, DKSH, Natera, Eisai, Pfizer Speakers' Bureau: Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Merck, Astellas Pharma Mohamad Farid Honoraria: Bayer Consulting or Advisory Role: Bayer N. Gopalakrishna Iyer Consulting or Advisory Role: InvitroCue Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: A device and method of providing lighting during surgeries in deep and narrow cavities Inventors: N. C. Tan, W. S. Tan, M. H. Chew, H. K. Tan, P. Sunkeri, R. S. L. Lieu, F. W. L. Loke, N. G. Iyer. PCTSG2016-050231. Licensed to Vivo Surgical Pte Ltd Wan Teck Lim Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical Daniel S. W. Tan Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Merck, Loxo, AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer Research Funding: Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.Aaron C. Tan Honoraria: Amgen, Thermo Fisher Scientific Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: ASLAN Pharmaceuticals, Illumina Tira J. Tan Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Immunomedics Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Lilly, Pfizer, DKSH, Novartis Speakers' Bureau: Novartis Research Funding: Bayer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Odonate Therapeutics, Synthon Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Eisai Matthew C. H. Ng Honoraria: MSD Oncology, Taiho Pharmaceutical, ASLAN Pharmaceuticals, Lilly Consulting or Advisory Role: MSD Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck Speakers' Bureau: Lilly Research Funding: ASLAN Pharmaceuticals Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD Oncology, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb David W. M. Tai Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai Speakers' Bureau: Ipsen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Roche Research Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sirtex Medical, Novartis. Justina Y. C. Lam Honoraria: AstraZeneca Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca Research Funding: Bayer, Merus, Bristol Myers Squibb Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Lilly Bien-Soo Tan Research Funding: Boston Scientific Rebecca Alexandra Dent Honoraria: Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Pfizer, Merck, Eisai, AstraZeneca, Novartis Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Pfizer, Amgen, Merck Yoon-Sim Yap Honoraria: Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Eisai, MSD, Inivata Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Eisai, MSD, Inivata Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Lilly, Roche, Novartis Iain B. H. Tan Honoraria: Amgen, Roche, Merck Serono, MSD Consulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Roche, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis Research Funding: MSD Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck Serono, Amgen Su Pin Choo Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Bayer, MSD Oncology, Eisai, Roche Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb Chee-Keong Toh Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Nektar Consulting or Advisory Role: Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Astellas Pharma, MSD Oncology, Roche, DKSH, Natera, Eisai, Pfizer Speakers' Bureau: Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Merck, Astellas Pharma Mohamad Farid Honoraria: Bayer Consulting or Advisory Role: Bayer N. Gopalakrishna Iyer Consulting or Advisory Role: InvitroCue Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: A device and method of providing lighting during surgeries in deep and narrow cavities Inventors: N. C. Tan, W. S. Tan, M. H. Chew, H. K. Tan, P. Sunkeri, R. S. L. Lieu, F. W. L. Loke, N. G. Iyer. PCTSG2016-050231. Licensed to Vivo Surgical Pte Ltd Wan Teck Lim Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical Daniel S. W. Tan Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Merck, Loxo, AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer Research Funding: Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche No other potential conflicts of interest were reported., (© 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Introduction: RET rearrangements are an emerging targetable oncogenic fusion driver in NSCLC. However, the natural history of disease and activity of different classes of systemic therapy remain to be defined. Furthermore, molecular testing for RET is not yet routine, and the optimal method of testing is unclear. We present a comparative analysis of molecular profiling with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) and treatment outcomes., Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of patients treated at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. Baseline demographics and treatment outcomes were collected., Results: A total of 64 patients were included, with a median age of 62 years (range: 25-85), 56% were women, 77% were of Chinese ethnicity, 95% had adenocarcinoma, and 69% were never smokers. RET rearrangement was detected by FISH in 30 of 34 patients (88%), NGS in 40 of 43 patients (93%), and with discordant results in seven of 13 patients (54%) tested with both methods. Of 61 patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent disease, prevalence of central nervous system metastases was 31% and 92% received palliative systemic therapy. Overall survival was prolonged in patients treated with a selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitor versus untreated patients (median 49.3 versus 15.3 mo; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06-0.40, p < 0.001). However, it was not different in patients treated with immunotherapy versus untreated patients (median 37.7 versus 49.3 mo; HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.53-3.19, p = 0.53). Overall survival was also prolonged in patients with CCDC6-RET fusion versus those with KIF5B-RET fusion (median 113.5 versus 37.7 mo; HR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.38, p = 0.009)., Conclusions: In RET-rearranged NSCLC, selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is associated with improved survival outcomes, especially in patients with CCDC6-RET fusion. However, immunotherapy has poor efficacy. NGS and FISH testing methods may also result in substantial discordance., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: In early-stage pancreatic cancer, there are currently no biomarkers to guide selection of therapeutic options. This prospective biomarker trial evaluated the feasibility and potential clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis to inform adjuvant therapy decision making., Materials and Methods: Patients considered by the multidisciplinary team to have resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Pre- and post-operative samples for ctDNA analysis were collected. PCR-based-SafeSeqS assays were used to identify mutations at codon 12, 13 and 61 of KRAS in the primary pancreatic tumor and to detect ctDNA. Results of ctDNA analysis were correlated with CA19-9, recurrence-free and overall survival (OS). Patient management was per standard of care, blinded to ctDNA data., Results: Of 112 patients consented pre-operatively, 81 (72%) underwent resection. KRAS mutations were identified in 91% (38/42) of available tumor samples. Of available plasma samples (N = 42), KRAS mutated ctDNA was detected in 62% (23/37) pre-operative and 37% (13/35) post-operative cases. At a median follow-up of 38.4 months, ctDNA detection in the pre-operative setting was associated with inferior recurrence-free survival (RFS) [hazard ratio (HR) 4.1; P = 0.002)] and OS (HR 4.1; P = 0.015). Detectable ctDNA following curative intent resection was associated with inferior RFS (HR 5.4; P < 0.0001) and OS (HR 4.0; P = 0.003). Recurrence occurred in 13/13 (100%) patients with detectable ctDNA post-operatively, including in seven that received gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy., Conclusion: ctDNA studies in localized pancreatic cancer are challenging, with a substantial number of patients not able to undergo resection, not having sufficient tumor tissue for analysis or not completing per protocol sample collection. ctDNA analysis, pre- and/or post-surgery, is a promising prognostic marker. Studies of ctDNA guided therapy are justified, including of treatment intensification strategies for patients with detectable ctDNA post-operatively who appear at very high risk of recurrence despite gemcitabine-based adjuvant therapy., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are a heterogenous group of rare tumors whose natural history remains poorly defined. Accurate prognostication of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is essential for guiding clinical decisions. This paper aims to summarize all the commonly utilized and recently proposed prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms published in the literature to date., Methods: A systematic review of Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase databases, of the period from January 1, 2000-November 29, 2016, was conducted to identify all published articles reporting on prognostication systems of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms., Results: A total of 23 articles were included in our review, and a total of 25 classification systems were identified. There were 2 modifications of the World Health Organization 2004 criteria, 4 modifications of the World Health Organization 2010 criteria, 2 modifications of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 2010 staging system, 3 modifications of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2006 tumor, node, metastasis staging system, 7 novel categorial classification systems, and 2 novel proposed continuous classifications. The most commonly included variables included age, size of tumor, presence of distant and lymph node metastases, Ki-67 index, and mitotic count., Conclusion: Numerous prognostication systems have been proposed for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, of which the most commonly used systems presently include the World Health Organization 2010 criteria and the two tumor, node, metastasis staging systems by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society and the American Joint Commission on Cancer. However, prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms continue to evolve with time as more prognostication factors are identified. More validation and comparative studies are needed to identify the most effective prognostication system., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Resistance to gemcitabine remains a key challenge in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), necessitating the constant search for effective strategies for a priori prediction of clinical outcome. While the existing studies focused on aberration of drug disposition genes and proteins as molecular predictors of gemcitabine treatment outcomes, the metabolic aberration associated with chemoresistance in clinical PDAC has been neglected. This exploratory study investigated the potential role of tissue metabolomics in characterizing the clinical treatment outcome of gemcitabine therapy., Methods: Surgically resected tumors from PDAC patients who underwent gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 25) were subjected to metabotyping using gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC/TOFMS)., Results: A partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model clearly distinguished patients who had favorable survival [overall survival (OS) > 24 months] from those who exhibited poorer survival (OS < 16 months) (Q 2  = 0.302). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis demonstrated the robustness of the PLS-DA model with an area under the curve of 1. PLS-DA revealed 19 marker metabolites (e.g., lactic acid, proline, and pyroglutamate) that shed insights into the chemoresistance of gemcitabine in PDAC. Particularly, tissue levels of lactic acid complemented transcript expression levels of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 in distinguishing patients according to their overall survival., Conclusion: This work established proof-of-principle for GC/TOFMS-based global metabotyping of PDAC and laid the foundation for future discovery of metabolic biomarkers predictive of gemcitabine resistance in PDAC chemotherapy.

Background: This article aims to validate and compare the performance of 6 prognostication systems-the World Health Organization 2010 grading criteria, the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society and the American Joint Committee for Cancer staging systems, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center staging and grading systems, as well as the Bilimoria criteria in a cohort of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms at a single institution., Methods: A retrospective review of 176 patients with histologically proven pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm was performed. The prognostic ability of the various prognostication systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm was assessed by analyzing the homogeneity, discriminatory ability, monotonicity of gradient, and Akaike information criteria., Results: The 5-year overall survival for the 176 patients was 69% and 5-year recurrence-free survival in 119 patients who underwent curative resection was 78%. Comparison between the 6 prognostication systems demonstrated that the World Health Organization 2010 system had the lowest Akaike information criteria score and was hence the best prognostication system in predicting overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates in our cohort of patients. The European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society was superior to the American Joint Committee for Cancer in prognosticating overall survival rates for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, as there was a statistically significant difference in overall survival across the different stages when stratified by the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society, while the use of the American Joint Committee for Cancer was limited to distinguishing between patients in stages I and II versus stages III and IV only., Conclusion: All 6 prognostication systems were useful in the prognostication of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm. The World Health Organization 2010 grading system was the best prognostication system in predicting both overall survival in our entire cohort of patients and recurrence-free survival in the subset of patients who underwent curative resection., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)