Search

Simple Summary: The diagnostic performance and interobserver variability of the contrast-enhanced CT currently used for evaluating arterial involvement from pancreatic cancer has limitations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of reconstructed CT images perpendicular to the artery for assessing arterial involvement from pancreatic cancer and to compare the interobserver variability between it and the current diagnostic imaging method. We found that reconstructed CT images perpendicular to the splenic artery were feasible and showed less interobserver variability than current diagnostic method images. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of reconstructed CT images perpendicular to the artery for assessing arterial involvement from pancreatic cancer and compare the interobserver variability between it and the current diagnostic imaging method. This retrospective study included patients with pancreatic cancer in the pancreatic body or tail who underwent preoperative pancreatic protocol CT and distal pancreatectomy. Five radiologists used axial and coronal CT images (current method) and perpendicular reconstructed CT images (proposed method) to determine if the degree of solid soft-tissue contact with the splenic artery was ≤180° or >180°. The generalized estimating equations were used to compare the diagnostic performance of solid soft-tissue contact >180° between the current and proposed methods. Fleiss' ĸ statistics were used to assess interobserver variability. The sensitivity and negative predictive value for diagnosing solid soft-tissue contact >180° were higher (p < 0.001 for each) and the specificity (p = 0.003) and positive predictive value (p = 0.003) were lower in the proposed method than the current method. Interobserver variability was improved in the proposed method compared with the current method (ĸ = 0.87 vs. 0.67). Reconstructed CT images perpendicular to the artery showed higher sensitivity and negative predictive value for diagnosing solid soft-tissue contact >180° than the current method and demonstrated improved interobserver variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• 4D FreeBreathing combined with Compressed SENSE was feasible in dynamic contrast-enhanced pancreatic MRI. • 4D FreeBreathing improved motion artifacts and provided diagnosable image quality as compared with eTHRIVE. • All examinations scanned by 4D FreeBreathing showed appropriate scan timing for the pancreatic phase. To evaluate the feasibility of a free-breathing sequence (4D FreeBreathing) combined with Compressed SENSE in dynamic contrast-enhanced pancreatic MRI and compare it with a breath-holding sequence (eTHRIVE). Patients who underwent pancreatic MRI, either eTHRIVE or 4D FreeBreathing, from April 2022 to November 2023 were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists, who were unaware of the scan sequence, independently and randomly reviewed the images at the precontrast, pancreatic, portal venous, and equilibrium phases and assigned confidence scores for motion and streaking artifacts, pancreatic sharpness, and overall image quality using a 5-point scale. Furthermore, the radiologists assessed the appropriateness of the scan timing of the pancreatic phase. Mann–Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests were conducted to compare the confidence scores and adequacy of the pancreatic phase scan timing between eTHRIVE and 4D FreeBreathing. Overall, 48 patients (median age, 71 years; interquartile range, 64–77 years; 24 women) were included. Among them, 20 patients (42%) were scanned using 4D FreeBreathing. The 4D FreeBreathing showed moderate streaking artifact but improved motion artifact (P <.001–.17) at all phases. Pancreatic sharpness and overall image quality were almost comparable between two sequences (P =.17–.96). All 20 examinations in 4D FreeBreathing showed appropriate pancreatic phase images, but only 16 (57%; P <.001 for reviewer 1) and 18 (64%; P =.003 for reviewer 2) examinations showed it in eTHRIVE. The use of 4D FreeBreathing combined with Compressed SENSE was feasible in pancreatic MRI and provided appropriate pancreatic phase images in all examinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of single-shot echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging with compressed SENSE (EPICS-DWI) for pancreas assessment by comparing with single-shot echo planar DWI with parallel imaging (PI-DWI)., Methods: This multicenter prospective study included 27 consecutive participants with untreated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (15 men; mean age, 67 ± 10 years) who underwent pancreatic protocol MRI including both PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI. Two radiologists independently and randomly reviewed the high b-value DWI images and qualitatively assigned confidence scores for overall image quality, image noise, pancreas conspicuity, and PDAC conspicuity using a 5-point scale. One radiologist measured the PDAC-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) on high b-value DWI images and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of PDAC. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were compared between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test., Results: The confidence scores for overall image quality (P < 0.001 in both radiologists) and image noise (P < 0.001 in both radiologists) were higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI. The pancreas conspicuity was better in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI in one of the radiologists (P = 0.02 and 0.06). The PDAC conspicuity was comparable between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI (P > 0.99 in both radiologists). The PDAC-to-pancreas CNR was higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI (P = 0.02), while the ADC value of PDAC in PI-DWI was not significantly different compared to that in EPICS-DWI (P = 0.48)., Conclusion: The image quality and PDAC-to-pancreas CNR was improved in EPICS-DWI compared to PI-DWI. However, the conspicuity and ADC value of PDAC were comparable between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI.