Search

The present study aimed to summarize and report data on errors related to treatment planning, which were collected by medical physicists. The following analyses were performed based on the 10-year error report data: (1) listing of high-risk errors that occurred and (2) the relationship between the number of treatments and error rates, (3) usefulness of the Automated Plan Checking System (APCS) with the Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface and (4) the relationship between human factors and error rates. Differences in error rates were observed before and after the use of APCS. APCS reduced the error rate by ~1% for high-risk errors and 3% for low-risk errors. The number of treatments was negatively correlated with error rates. Therefore, we examined the relationship between the workload of medical physicists and error occurrence and revealed that a very large workload may contribute to overlooking errors. Meanwhile, an increase in the number of medical physicists may lead to the detection of more errors. The number of errors was correlated with the number of physicians with less clinical experience; the error rates were higher when there were more physicians with less experience. This is likely due to the lack of training among clinically inexperienced physicians. An environment to provide adequate training is important, as inexperience in clinical practice can easily and directly lead to the occurrence of errors. In any environment, the need for additional plan checkers is an essential factor for eliminating errors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The research investigates dose distributions to regional lymph-node metastases (RLNMs) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients undergoing intracavitary and interstitial hybrid brachytherapy (IC/IS), a subject which has rarely been analyzed. Eleven sequential LACC patients with 38 RLNMs who received 38 IC/IS sessions were analyzed. RLNM dose distributions were assessed based on RLNM positions and ipsilateral interstitial needles, revealing significant differences in RLNM D90 based on whether the position was cranial or caudal of the uterine base and the number of interstitial needles was 0–1 or 2 or more. RLNMs located caudal of the uterine base with two or more ipsilateral interstitial needles received higher brachytherapy doses. The findings suggest that when calculating RLNM dose for external beam boost irradiation, consideration of RLNM position and interstitial needle count is crucial. This research sheds light on optimizing brachytherapy dosage delivery to RLNMs in LACC patients, potentially influencing treatment strategies. Purpose: Analyzing dose distributions to regional lymph-node metastases (RLNMs) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients undergoing intracavitary and interstitial hybrid brachytherapy (IC/IS). Methods: Dose distributions of eleven LACC patients with 38 RLNMs, and who received 38 IC/IS sessions were analyzed in EQD2, considering RLNM positions and ipsilateral interstitial needles; these RLNMs, excepting the para-aortic region, were classified into four groups. Results: RLNMs had a median of two ipsilateral interstitial needles per session. Significant differences were observed in total RLNM D90, depending on whether the position was cranial or caudal of the uterine base (85.5 vs. 378.9 cGy, p < 0.0001), and whether the RLNM D90 was associated with a number of ipsilateral interstitial needles between 0–1 or 2 or more (68.4 vs. 112.2 cGy, p = 0.006) per session. At each session, Group 1 RLNMs (cranial of the uterine base, 0–1 ipsilateral interstitial needle) had a mean D90 of 21.1 cGy; Group 2 (cranial, 2 or more), 73.8; Group 3 (caudal, 0–1), 94.7; and Group 4 (caudal, 2 or more), 136.1. Conclusion: RLNMs located caudal of the uterine base associated with two or more ipsilateral interstitial needles in IC/IS had a higher dose contribution, which should be considered when calculating the RLNMs' dose of external beam boost irradiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dysphagia after esophagectomy is the main cause of a prolonged postoperative stay. The present study investigated the effects of a swallowing intervention led by a speech–language–hearing therapist (SLHT) on postoperative dysphagia. We enrolled 276 consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastric anastomosis between July 2015 and December 2018; 109 received standard care (control group) and 167 were treated by a swallowing intervention (intervention group). In the intervention group, swallowing function screening and rehabilitation based on each patient's dysfunction were led by SLHT. The start of oral intake, length of oral intake rehabilitation, and length of the postoperative stay were compared in the two groups. The patient's subgroups in the 276 patients were examined to clarify the more effectiveness of the intervention. The start of oral intake was significantly earlier in the intervention group (POD: 11 vs. 8 days; P  = 0.009). In the subgroup analysis, the length of the postoperative stay was also significantly shortened by the swallowing intervention in patients without complications (POD: 18 vs. 14 days; P  = 0.001) and with recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) (POD: 30 vs. 21.5 days; P  = 0.003). A multivariate regression analysis identified the swallowing intervention as a significant independent factor for the earlier start of oral intake and a shorter postoperative stay in patients without complications and with RLNP. Our proposed swallowing intervention is beneficial for the earlier start of oral intake and discharge after esophagectomy, particularly in patients without complications and with RLNP. This program may contribute to enhanced recovery after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dysphagia due to bulbar involvement is a major symptom of patients with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA). The aim of this pilot study was to test the efficacy and safety of the head lift exercise for swallowing dysfunction in SBMA. Methods: We enrolled 6 subjects with genetically confirmed SBMA and instructed them to perform the head lift exercise for 6 weeks. The efficacy outcome measures were the changes from baseline in tongue pressure, the scores of swallowing functional questionnaires, and the motor functional scales and parameters of videofluorography (VF). Results: All subjects completed the study and no major adverse effects were recorded. Tongue pressure significantly increased by 19.2 ± 0.15% (p < 0.05) after the 6-week head lift exercise. The scores for oral dysphagia also improved, although there was no significant change in VF parameters or other variables examined pre- and post-exercise. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that the head lift exercise may improve swallowing dysfunction, particularly tongue pressure, in SBMA. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: In radiation therapy, the field-in-field (FIF) technique is used to prevent the administration of unnecessarily high doses to reduce toxicity. Recently, the FIF technique has been used for whole brain irradiation (WBI). Using the FIF technique, the volume that receives a higher than prescribed dose (hotspot) can be largely reduced; however, the treatment planning requires time. Therefore, to reduce the burden on the treatment planners, we propose a semiautomatic treatment planning method for the FIF technique., Methods: In the semiautomatic FIF technique, hotspot regions in a treatment plan without the FIF technique are identified three-dimensionally, and beams with blocks that cover the hotspot regions using a multileaf collimator (sub-beams) are automatically created. The sub-beams are added to the original plan, and weights are assigned based on the maximum dose of the original plan to decrease the doses in the hotspot regions. This method was applied to 22 patients previously treated with WBI, wherein treatment plans were originally created without the FIF technique., Results: In the semiautomatic FIF plans, the hotspots almost disappeared. The dose to 95% of the volume and the volume receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose in the planning target volume decreased by only 0.3% ± 0.2% and 0.0% ± 0.1%, respectively, on average compared with those in the original plan. The average semiautomatic FIF processing time was 28 ± 4 s., Conclusions: The proposed method reduced the hotspot regions with a slight change in the target coverage., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest in relation to this study., (© 2022 The Juntendo Medical Society.)