Search

Objective: To evaluate descriptive efficacy data, exploratory immunogenicity data, and safety follow-up through study completion from the global, phase 3 MATISSE (Maternal Immunization Study for Safety and Efficacy) maternal vaccination trial of bivalent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVpreF)., Methods: MATISSE was a phase 3, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Healthy pregnant participants aged 49 years or younger at 24-36 weeks of gestation were randomized (1:1) to receive a single RSVpreF 120 micrograms or placebo dose. Primary efficacy endpoints included newborn and infant severe RSV-associated medically attended lower respiratory tract illness within 180 days after birth. The RSV-A and RSV-B serum neutralizing antibody titers were determined in a subset of pregnant participants and their newborns., Results: In this final analysis, 7,420 pregnant participants were randomized, and 7,307 children were born (RSVpreF n=3,660, placebo n=3,647). Vaccine efficacy, defined as protection against newborn and infant severe RSV-associated medically attended lower respiratory tract illness, was 82.4% (95% CI, 57.5-93.9) and 70.0% (95% CI, 50.6-82.5) within 90 and 180 days of birth, respectively. The RSVpreF induced robust immune responses in pregnant participants and resulted in highly efficient transfer of maternal antibodies to their newborns across subgroups (by gestational age at delivery and at vaccination, number of days from vaccination to delivery, country, maternal age). Final RSVpreF safety results in pregnant and newborn and infant participants were consistent with the primary analysis with no new safety concerns identified., Conclusion: This final analysis of MATISSE trial data confirms the primary analysis conclusions: Maternal vaccination with RSVpreF has a favorable safety profile in both pregnant and newborn and infant participants and demonstrates efficacy against RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness in infants through age 6 months. The RSVpreF induces robust immune responses in pregnant individuals, with corresponding high RSV-neutralizing titers in their newborns., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04424316., (Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: A multicomponent meningococcal serogroups ABCWY vaccine (MenABCWY) could provide broad protection against disease-causing meningococcal strains and simplify the immunisation schedule. The aim of this trial was to confirm the effect of the licensed meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccine, 4CMenB, against diverse MenB strains, and to assess the breadth of immune response against a panel of 110 MenB strains for MenABCWY containing the antigenic components of 4CMenB and licensed serogroups ACWY vaccine, MenACWY-CRM, the non-inferiority of the immune response with MenABCWY versus 4CMenB and MenACWY-CRM, safety, and MenABCWY lot-to-lot consistency., Methods: We conducted a phase 3 randomised, controlled, observer-blinded trial of healthy adolescents and young adults (age 10-25 years) across 114 centres in Australia, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, Türkiye, and the USA. Exclusion criteria included previous vaccination with a MenB vaccine or (within the last 4 years) MenACWY vaccine. Participants were randomly allocated (5:5:3:3:3:1 ratio) via a central randomisation system using a minimisation procedure to receive 4CMenB at months 0, 2, and 6 (referred to as 4CMenB 0-2-6 hereafter); or 4CMenB at months 0 and 6 (referred to as 4CMenB 0-6 hereafter); or MenABCWY (three groups, each receiving one production lot of the MenACWY-CRM component) at months 0 and 6; or MenACWY-CRM at month 0. Demonstration in the per-protocol set of the consistency of three MenACWY-CRM component lots of the MenABCWY vaccine was a primary objective (demonstrated with two-sided 95% CIs for the ratio of human serum bactericidal antibody [hSBA] geometric mean titres against each serogroup within predefined criteria [0·5-2·0]). The primary endpoints (breadth of immune response) for the MenB component of MenABCWY and 4CMenB were measured using the endogenous complement hSBA (enc-hSBA) assay against a panel of 110 diverse MenB invasive disease strains. For each serum sample, 35 strains from the 110 MenB strain panel were randomly selected for testing. The 4CMenB breadth of immune response data have been published separately. For MenABCWY, breadth of immune response was assessed in two analyses: a test-based analysis of the percentage of samples (tests) without bactericidal serum activity against MenB strains 1 month after two MenABCWY doses versus the percentage after one MenACWY-CRM dose in the per-protocol set, and a responder-based analysis of the percentage of participants (responders) whose sera killed 70% or more strains at 1 month after two MenABCWY doses in the full analysis set. A lower limit of two-sided 95% CI above 65% would demonstrate breadth of immune response. Other primary outcomes included non-inferiority (5% margin) of two MenABCWY doses versus two 4CMenB doses by enc-hSBA assay in the per-protocol set, non-inferiority (10% margin) of two MenABCWY doses versus one MenACWY-CRM dose in MenACWY vaccine-naive participants by traditional hSBA assay in the per-protocol set, and safety in all vaccinated participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04502693, and is complete., Findings: Between Aug 14, 2020, and Sept 3, 2021, 3651 participants were enrolled and randomly allocated (900 in the 4CMenB 0-2-6 group and 908 in the 4CMenB 0-6 group, 1666 in the three MenABCWY groups combined, and 177 in the MenACWY-CRM group). All primary objectives for MenABCWY were met. Consistency of immune responses against the three production lots of the MenACWY component of MenABCWY was demonstrated since two-sided 95% CIs for the ratios of hSBA geometric mean titres against serogroups A, C, W, and Y for each pair of lots were within the predefined equivalence criteria. The lot data were pooled for the remainder of MenABCWY endpoints. By enc-hSBA assay, breadth of immune response against the MenB strain panel was 77·9% (95% CI 76·6 to 79·2) in the test-based analysis and 84·1% (81·4 to 86·5; 687 of 817 participants) in the responder-based analysis. Non-inferiority of MenABCWY to 4CMenB was demonstrated by enc-hSBA assay: the difference in percentage of samples with bactericidal serum activity between the MenABCWY group (82·5% [95% CI 82·1 to 83·0]; 21 222 of 25 715) and 4CMenB 0-2 group (83·1% [82·7 to 83·6]; 22 921 of 27 569) was -0·61% (-1·25 to 0·03). Non-inferiority of two-dose MenABCWY to one-dose MenACWY-CRM was demonstrated by traditional hSBA assay, with differences between the MenABCWY group and MenACWY group in percentages of participants with a four-fold rise in hSBA titres of 11·3% (5·9 to 19·0) for serogroup A, 47·2% (38·1 to 56·3) for serogroup C, 35·3% (26·9 to 44·5) for serogroup W, and 27·0% (19·4 to 35·8) for serogroup Y. MenABCWY reactogenicity was mostly of mild or moderate severity and transient, with similar frequencies of adverse events in the MenABCWY and 4CMenB groups and no safety concerns were identified., Interpretation: This study demonstrates breadth of immune response against a panel of 110 MenB strains for the MenB component of the investigational MenABCWY vaccine, when administered as a 0-6 months schedule to the target population of adolescents and young adults, with predefined criteria for success met for both breadth of immune response endpoints and for non-inferiority versus 4CMenB. This investigational vaccine could provide broad meningococcal serogroup coverage in a simplified immunisation schedule, thus aiding the public health attempt in preventing invasive meningococcal disease due to five Neisseria meningitidis serogroups in adolescents and young adults., Funding: GSK., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests TN reports payments to his institution from GSK for the conduct of this study. TN also reports payments from or membership with GSK, Pfizer, Seqirus, Moderna, MSD, Iliad, Dynavax, SII, AstraZeneca, Clover, Novavax, and IVI/SK Bio. CB is employed by GSK and holds financial equities in GSK. MB reports payments to his institution from GSK, MSD, ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, Sanofi, Novo-Nordisk, Pfizer, and Novavax; and also reports payments from, memberships with, or both from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, EyeGene, and Cymra, and holds shares in CSL. BSC reports payments from GSK and MSD. ECD performs contract work for Eskisehir Osmangazi University that is funded by GSK, Sanofi Pasteur, and Pfizer. DD reports payments from GSK, Pfizer, and Sanofi. DD also reports he is a member of the Committee of the Czech Vaccine Society. SKos reports payments from Moderna and Pfizer. JML reports payments to her institution from GSK for the conduct of this study, and also reports payment to her institution of an investigator-initiated grant from Pfizer on meningococcal vaccines and volunteer service for the Meningitis Foundation of Canada as a Senior Medical Advisor. MR reports payments to his institution from GSK for the conduct of this study, and also reports his institution carries out clinical vaccine studies for all major vaccine manufacturers. PCR reports payments to his institution from GSK for the conduct of this study, and also reports payments to his institution, advisory board memberships, or both from GSK, Merck, Sanofi, and Pfizer. PS reports payments from GSK, Seqirus, Merck, Sanofi, Vir, Moderna, Novavax, Hillevax, Affinivax, Astra Zeneca, and Novo Nordisk. BT reports payments to his institution from GSK for the conduct of this study, and also reports payments to his institution from Merck, Pfizer, and Moderna. BUk reports payments from Moderna. BUl reports payments from GSK, MSD, and Pfizer. ML and DT are employed by GSK and hold financial equities in GSK. MTr and AW are employed by GSK. All other authors declare no other financial and non-financial relationships and activities., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

In the province of Quebec, Canada, a 2 + 1 dose pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) program for children was implemented in 2004. PCV7, PCV10, PCV13 and a mixed PCV10/PCV13 schedule were sequentially used without catch-up. The effectiveness of vaccination schedules to prevent serotype 19A invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in <5-year-old children was estimated by the indirect cohort method during 2009-2023. A total of 248 19A IPD cases and 457 IPD controls were included in the analysis. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VEa) for ≥1 dose was 57 % [95 %CI: -1 %,82 %] for PCV10 and 62 % [16 %,83 %] for PCV13. VEa for 3 doses was 69 % [17 %,88 %] for PCV10, 76 % [39 %,90 %] for PCV13 and 86 % [64 %,95 %] for the 2PCV10 + 1PCV13 schedule. Protection provided by the PCV10-only schedule tended to be of lower magnitude compared to the two other schedules. The mixed PCV10 + PCV13 schedule showed a protection against 19A IPD at least comparable to that of 3 PCV-13 doses., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The study was mainly supported by the Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services and also by the Canadian Immunization Research Network. Sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript. This research received no other external financial or non-financial support. All co-authors have no conflict of interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) strains are highly diverse. Breadth of immune response for the MenB vaccine, 4CMenB, administered at 0-2, 0-6, or 0-2-6 months, was demonstrated by endogenous complement-human serum bactericidal antibody (enc-hSBA) assay against an epidemiologically relevant panel of 110 MenB strains., Methods: In a phase 3 trial, 3651 healthy 10- to 25-year-old participants were randomized 5:5:9:1 to receive 4CMenB (0-6 schedule), 4CMenB (0-2-6 schedule), investigational MenABCWY vaccine, or control MenACWY-CRM vaccine. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and demonstrate breadth of immune response by enc-hSBA assay against the MenB strain panel using test-based (percentage of samples without bactericidal activity against strains after 4CMenB vs control vaccination) and responder-based (percentage of participants whose postvaccination sera kill ≥70% strains) approaches. Success was demonstrated with 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) lower limit >65%. Immunogenicity was assessed by traditional hSBA assay against four indicator strains., Results: Breadth of immune response (test-based) was 78.7% (97.5% CI, 77.2-80.1), 81.8% (80.4-83.1), 83.2% (81.9-84.4) for the 0-2, 0-6, and 0-2-6 schedules, respectively, and (responder-based) 84.8% (81.8-87.5), 89.8% (87.2-92.0), and 93.4% (91.2-95.2), respectively. No clinically relevant differences in immunogenicity were observed across schedules. 4CMenB was well tolerated., Conclusions: The 2-dose (0-2, 0-6) 4CMenB schedules met predefined criteria for success for both breadth of immune response endpoints against a diverse MenB strain panel, had comparable immunogenicity, and safety in line with the established 4CMenB safety profile. The 3-dose schedule provided no additional immunological benefit, supporting use of the 4CMenB 0-2 schedule., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. Terry Nolan reports payments to his institution from GSK for the conduct of this study. Terry Nolan also reports payments and/or memberships from GSK, Pfizer, Seqirus, Moderna, MSD, Iliad, Dynavax, SII, AstraZeneca, Clover, Novavax, and IVI/SK Bio. Chiranjiwi Bhusal is employed by GSK and holds financial equities in GSK. Jiří Beran has nothing to disclose. Mark Bloch reports payments to his institution from GSK, MSD, ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, Sanofi, Novo-Nordisk, Pfizer, Novavax. Mark Bloch also reports payments and/or memberships from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, EyeGene, Cymra DSMB, and holds shares in CSL. Benhur Sirvan Cetin reports payments from GSK and MSD. Ener Cagri Dinleyici performs contract work for Eskisehir Osmangazi University that is funded by GSK, Sanofi Pasteur, and Pfizer. Daniel Dražan reports payments from GSK, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Daniel Dražan also reports he is a member of the Committee of the Czech Vaccine Society. Satu Kokko has nothing to disclose. Susanna Koski reports payments from Moderna and Pfizer. Outi Laajalahti has nothing to disclose. Joanne M. Langley reports payments to her institution from GSK for the conduct of this study. Joanne M. Langley also reports volunteer service for the Meningitis Foundation of Canada as a Senior Medical Advisor. Mika Rämet reports payments to his institution from GSK for the conduct of this study. Mika Rämet also reports his institution carries out clinical vaccine studies for all major vaccine manufacturers. Peter C. Richmond reports payments to his institution from GSK for the conduct of this study. Peter C. Richmond also reports payments to his institution and/or advisory board memberships from GSK, Merck, Sanofi, and Pfizer. Peter Silas reports payments from GSK, Seqirus, Merck, Sanofi, Vir, Moderna, Novavax, Hillevax, Affinivax, Astra Zeneca, and Novo Nordisk. Bruce Tapiero reports payments to his institution from GSK for the conduct of this study. Bruce Tapiero also reports payments to his institution from Merck, Pfizer, and Moderna. Florence Tiong has nothing to disclose. Mary Tipton has nothing to disclose. Benita Ukkonen reports payments from Moderna. Betul Ulukol reports payments from GSK, MSD, and Pfizer. Maria Lattanzi is employed by GSK and holds financial equities in GSK. Mauro Trapani is employed by GSK. Arnold Willemsen is employed by GSK. Daniela Toneatto is employed by GSK and holds financial equities in GSK. All authors declare no other financial and nonfinancial relationships and activities., (© GSK Plc 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Introduction: An infected popliteal pseudoaneurysm has never been described in the pediatric population. Physicians need to be aware of its presentation and management, in order to diagnose and treat this medical condition adequately., Methods: We describe the case of a 14-year-old boy who developed myositis and cellulitis centered at the popliteal fossa after playing basketball. A treatment of intravenous cefazolin was started. 5 days later, he experienced a knee pain flare-up, which turned out to be a popliteal pyomyositis with a pseudoaneurysm of the popliteal artery. A saphenous vein graft bypass of the popliteal artery and an excision of the popliteal pseudoaneurysm were performed. Intravenous cefazolin was continued for 6 weeks and prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid for 6 months., Results and Conclusion: This case highlighted the importance of repeating radiologic investigations if a patient suffering from soft tissue infection has persistent pain after several days of appropriate antibiotics. A popliteal pseudoaneurysm can be diagnosed with ultrasound imaging and treated with a popliteal-popliteal bypass. Our patient needed a catheter-guided dilation of the anastomosis at the vein graft 6 months post-surgery, and then evolved favorably and went back to playing basketball 6 months post-dilation., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of lower respiratory tract infections in infants. This phase 1/2, observer-blind, randomized, controlled study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational chimpanzee-derived adenoviral vector RSV vaccine (ChAd155-RSV, expressing RSV F, N, and M2-1) in infants., Methods: Healthy 6- to 7-month-olds were 1:1:1-randomized to receive 1 low ChAd155-RSV dose (1.5 × 1010 viral particles) followed by placebo (RSV&#95;1D); 2 high ChAd155-RSV doses (5 × 1010 viral particles) (RSV&#95;2D); or active comparator vaccines/placebo (comparator) on days 1 and 31. Follow-up lasted approximately 2 years., Results: Two hundred one infants were vaccinated (RSV&#95;1D: 65; RSV&#95;2D: 71; comparator: 65); 159 were RSV-seronaive at baseline. Most solicited and unsolicited adverse events after ChAd155-RSV occurred at similar or lower rates than after active comparators. In infants who developed RSV infection, there was no evidence of vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD). RSV-A neutralizing titers and RSV F-binding antibody concentrations were higher post-ChAd155-RSV than postcomparator at days 31, 61, and end of RSV season 1 (mean follow-up, 7 months). High-dose ChAd155-RSV induced stronger responses than low-dose, with further increases post-dose 2., Conclusions: ChAd155-RSV administered to 6- to 7-month-olds had a reactogenicity/safety profile like other childhood vaccines, showed no evidence of VAERD, and induced a humoral immune response. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03636906., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. V. N., Y. Z., W. P., D. F., I. D., A. G. L., R. M., S. K. S., and N. V. are or were employees of GSK during the conduct of the study. I. D., W. P., and S. K. S. hold GSK shares/stocks. R. M. and S. K. S. hold stock/stock options in Moderna. B. T., E. J. A., B. S. C., E. C. D., H. S., J. D. C., J. M. M. A., K. L., M. M. M.-P., M. R., S. N. F., F. B.-A., and T. P. report grants and/or other support from GSK for the conduct of the study. J. M. L. reports grants from GSK paid to her institution for the conduct of the study and holds the CIHR-GSK Chair in Pediatric Vaccinology at Dalhousie University. B. T. reports grants from GSK, Merck, and Pfizer for other trials. C. e. reports support for scientific meetings from GSK and ViiV and advisory consultancy fees from GSK. E. J. A. has consulted for Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, GSK, Janssen, Moderna, and Medscape, and his institution receives funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from MedImmune, Regeneron, PaxVax, Pfizer, GSK, Merck, Novavax, Sanofi Pasteur, Janssen, and Micron; he serves on a safety monitoring board for Kentucky BioProcessing and Sanofi Pasteur; serves on a data adjudication board for WCG and ACI Clinical; and his institution has also received funding from the National Institutes of Health to conduct clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines. B. S. C. reports grants for other vaccine trials from GSK and MSD paid to his institution. E. C. D. performs contract work for the Eskisehir Osmangazi University funded by GSK, Sanofi Pasteur, and Pfizer. E. K. reports honoraria for lectures from GSK, MSD, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, and Pfizer. E. L.-M. reports grants from Centro de Estudios en Infectología Pediátrica. F. M.-T. reports grants from Janssen, MSD, and AstraZeneca; personal fees from Ablynx, GSK, Pfizer, MSD, Sanofi Pasteur, Novavax, Seqirus, and Biofabri; nonfinancial support from GSK, Pfizer, MSD, and Seqirus; and trial fees paid to his institution from these different companies (except Biofabri). H. S. reports personal fees and trial fees paid to his institution from MSD, Seqirus, Pfizer, Janssen, and Sanofi Pasteur. I. S. C. has received payment to his institution from GSK for the conduct of the study, by contract approved by the corresponding ethical committees and health authorities, and for trials of other vaccine manufacturers, and has received grants and/or honoraria as a consultant/advisor/speaker or for attending conferences and practical courses from GSK and other vaccine manufacturers. J. D. C. is a member of the Committee on Infectious Diseases of the American Academy of Pediatrics and reports funds paid to his university to study RSV vaccines. J. D.-D. reports grants from GSK, MSD, and Sanofi Pasteur paid to his institution. J. M. M. A. reports fees for medical meetings from GSK and Pfizer. K. L. reports grants from ReViral and Shionogi. M. M.-P. reports grants from MSD, Roche, GSK, Janssen, Takeda, and Syneos. M. R. reports grants for other vaccine trials from GSK and other vaccine manufacturers paid to his institution. S. N. F. reports fees paid to his institution for attending meetings, advisory boards, and/or grants for clinical trials from AstraZeneca/Medimmune, GSK, J&J, Pfizer, Sanofi, Seqirus, Sandoz, Valneva, Novavax, and Merck. X. S.-L. reports grants from Cevaxin Vaccine Research Center. F. B.-A. reports consultancy fees from GSK, Pfizer, and MSD and grants from MSD. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

In the province of Quebec, Canada, a 2 + 1 dose pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) program for children was implemented in 2004. PCV7 was replaced by PCV10 in 2009, by PCV13 in 2011 and by PCV10 in 2018, without catch-up in all instances. The objective was to estimate PCV13 effectiveness to prevent serotype 3 invasive pneumococcal disease in children aged less than 5 years, using 2010-2018 mandatory notification and laboratory surveillance data, an indirect cohort design and multivariate logistic regression models. A total of 29 cases of serotype 3 and 290 non-vaccine serotype cases as controls were analysed. Overall vaccine effectiveness (≥1 dose) was estimated at 59% [-39% to 88%]. During the first year after the last dose effectivness was 88% [47% to 97%] whereas no protection was observed thereafter. There was no trend towards increased effectiveness with the number of doses. PCV13 protection against serotype 3 IPD seems to be short-lived., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Potential conflicts of interest The sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript. This research received no other external financial or non-financial support. All co-authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Whether vaccination during pregnancy could reduce the burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract illness in newborns and infants is uncertain., Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind trial conducted in 18 countries, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, pregnant women at 24 through 36 weeks' gestation to receive a single intramuscular injection of 120 μg of a bivalent RSV prefusion F protein-based (RSVpreF) vaccine or placebo. The two primary efficacy end points were medically attended severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness and medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness in infants within 90, 120, 150, and 180 days after birth. A lower boundary of the confidence interval for vaccine efficacy (99.5% confidence interval [CI] at 90 days; 97.58% CI at later intervals) greater than 20% was considered to meet the success criterion for vaccine efficacy with respect to the primary end points., Results: At this prespecified interim analysis, the success criterion for vaccine efficacy was met with respect to one primary end point. Overall, 3682 maternal participants received vaccine and 3676 received placebo; 3570 and 3558 infants, respectively, were evaluated. Medically attended severe lower respiratory tract illness occurred within 90 days after birth in 6 infants of women in the vaccine group and 33 infants of women in the placebo group (vaccine efficacy, 81.8%; 99.5% CI, 40.6 to 96.3); 19 cases and 62 cases, respectively, occurred within 180 days after birth (vaccine efficacy, 69.4%; 97.58% CI, 44.3 to 84.1). Medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness occurred within 90 days after birth in 24 infants of women in the vaccine group and 56 infants of women in the placebo group (vaccine efficacy, 57.1%; 99.5% CI, 14.7 to 79.8); these results did not meet the statistical success criterion. No safety signals were detected in maternal participants or in infants and toddlers up to 24 months of age. The incidences of adverse events reported within 1 month after injection or within 1 month after birth were similar in the vaccine group (13.8% of women and 37.1% of infants) and the placebo group (13.1% and 34.5%, respectively)., Conclusions: RSVpreF vaccine administered during pregnancy was effective against medically attended severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness in infants, and no safety concerns were identified. (Funded by Pfizer; MATISSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04424316.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Respiratory viruses have been previously suspected to trigger invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). After progressive non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) lifting, an unusual RSV outbreak has been observed in the Fall 2021, raising concerns about the possible consequences on IPD. We aimed to analyse the evolution of IPD incidence across age-groups since NPI lifting, and its temporal association with respiratory viral infections., Methods: We conducted a time-series analysis using 1) population-based IPD surveillance data and 2) statistics from the laboratory surveillance network of respiratory viruses in the province of Quebec, Canada, from January 2013 to January 2022. The monthly IPD incidence was analysed by quasi-Poisson regression models across age-groups. The fraction of IPD incidence change potentially attributable to different viruses in 2021-2022 was estimated., Findings: A total of 7712 IPD cases were included. After a major decrease in IPD incidence from April 2020, IPD rate started to increase in <5-year-old children in October 2021, exceeding the pre-NPI trend (+62%). This was temporally associated with an unusual surge in RSV cases (+53% versus pre-NPI trend). During this 2021-22 surge, the fraction of IPD attributable to RSV dynamics in children was 77% (95% CI [33-100]). By contrast, the IPD incidence in older age-groups remained low, and was temporally associated with influenza dynamics., Interpretation: These results provide new evidence on the role of respiratory viruses in driving IPD dynamics, with possible differences between children and adults. In the coming future, the potential benefit of interventions targeting RSV, such as vaccines, for IPD prevention should be considered., Funding: The study was supported by a grant from the Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services (' ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec' ). Publication was supported by a grant from "Fondation de l'Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris et de l'Alliance « Tous Unis contre le Virus » (Fondation de France/Institut Pasteur/APHP)". N.O. was supported by the ESPID (European Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases) 2021-2023 Fellowship Award and the 2022 ISPPD (International Symposium on Pneumococci and Pneumococcal Diseases) Robert Austrian Research award., Competing Interests: N.O. reports travel grants from Pfizer, Sanofi, and GSK, outside the present work. B.L. received research grants from Pfizer. All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: The introduction of rotavirus vaccines in national immunization programs has decreased mortality and hospitalizations due to diarrhea. GSK's live-attenuated, human rotavirus vaccine (HRV) is a 2-dose vaccine for oral administration. Following the detection of porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV-1) in HRV, a PCV-free (no detection of PCV-1 and PCV-2 according to the detection limits of tests used) HRV was developed. The immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of a liquid (liq) PCV-free HRV were assessed in two prior studies. The present study aimed to generate additional reactogenicity and safety data., Methods: This phase III, observer-blind, randomized, controlled multi-country study enrolled healthy 6-12-week-old infants. Infants were randomized to receive 2 doses of either the liq PCV-free HRV (N = 677) or the lyophilized (lyo) HRV (N = 674) 1-2 months apart. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 8 days after each dose, unsolicited AEs for 31 days and serious AEs (SAEs) from dose 1 until the end of the 6-month safety follow-up., Results: The occurrence of solicited general AEs was comparable between the liq PCV-free HRV and the lyo HRV groups, with irritability/fussiness being the most frequently reported (74.9% [95% confidence interval: 71.4-78.1] and 72.1% [68.6-75.5]). Unsolicited AEs were reported for 29.7% (26.3-33.3) and 30.6% (27.1-34.2) of infants in the liq PCV-free HRV and the lyo HRV group. A total of 39 and 38 infants reported at least one SAE, respectively. The most common SAEs were upper respiratory tract (0.7% and 0.9%) and urinary tract infections (0.9% and 0.6%). One SAE (constipation) in the liq PCV-free HRV group was considered as potentially causally related to vaccination by the investigator. No deaths were reported., Conclusions: The study showed that the reactogenicity and safety profiles of the liq PCV-free HRV and the lyo HRV are similar., Clinicaltrials: gov identifier: NCT0395474., Competing Interests: 9. Declaration of Competing Interest DB, LM, MP and TS are employees of the GSK group of companies, and DB, LM and TS hold shares in the GSK group of companies as part of their employee remuneration. BT, ECD, JDC, SAH and YLL received grants from the GSK group of companies during the conduct of the study. BT’s institution received research grants for vaccine-related studies from Merck, GSK and Pfizer. SAH declares other financial relationships with Sanofi, Pfizer, Merck, Entos, IMV Inc. and VBI Vaccines outside of the submitted work. SAH declares having served on a data safety monitoring board for Medicago, advisory boards for Pfizer, Merck, GSK, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Medicago, and has received payment for expert testimony from the Province of Ontario, Canada. Additionally, SAH serves as a co-chair of the Vaccine Surveillance Reference Group, Public Health Agency of Canada. ECD declares other financial relationships with Sanofi Pasteur, Pfizer and the GSK group of companies outside of the submitted work. BSC, CCH, LMH, MT and TFL have no competing interest to declare. The authors have no non-financial competing interest to declare., (Copyright © 2022 GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S.A. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pneumococcal disease remains a public health priority worldwide. This phase 2 study (V114-008; NCT02987972; EudraCT 2016-001117-25) compared safety and immunogenicity of 2 clinical lots of V114 (investigational 15-valent pneumococcal vaccine: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, 19A, 22F*, 23F, 33F*) to 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in healthy infants (*serotypes unique to V114)., Methods: Healthy infants 6-12 weeks old were randomized to receive a 4-dose regimen of V114 Lot 1, V114 Lot 2 or PCV13 at 2, 4, 6 and 12-15 months old. Adverse events were evaluated after each dose. Primary immunogenicity endpoint was to demonstrate noninferiority of V114 Lot 1 and V114 Lot 2 relative to PCV13 based on proportion of infants achieving serotype-specific IgG concentration ≥0.35 µg/mL for 13 serotypes shared with PCV13 at 1 month postdose 3 (PD3). Serotype-specific IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for all 15 V114 serotypes were measured at PD3, predose 4 and 1 month postdose 4 (PD4)., Results: Overall, 1044 of 1051 randomized infants received ≥1 dose of vaccine (V114 Lot 1 [n = 350], V114 Lot 2 [n = 347] or PCV13 [n = 347]). Adverse events were generally comparable across groups. At PD3, both V114 lots met noninferiority criteria for all 13 serotypes shared with PCV13. IgG GMCs were comparable among V114 and PCV13 recipients at PD3 and PD4. Serotype 3 responses were higher following receipt of V114 than PCV13. Both V114 lots induced higher GMCs than PCV13 to the 2 unique V114 serotypes., Conclusions: Immunogenicity of both V114 lots was noninferior to PCV13 for all 13 shared serotypes between the 2 vaccines and displayed comparable safety and tolerability profiles to PCV13.

Background: Pertussis immunization during pregnancy is recommended in many countries. Data from large randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of this approach., Methods: This phase IV, observer-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial assessed immunogenicity, transplacental transfer of maternal pertussis antibodies, reactogenicity and safety of a reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-three-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) during pregnancy. Women received Tdap or placebo at 27-36 weeks' gestation with crossover ≤ 72-hour-postpartum immunization. Immune responses were assessed before the pregnancy dose and 1 month after, and from the umbilical cord at delivery. Superiority (primary objective) was reached if the lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the pertussis geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratios (Tdap/control) in cord blood were ≥ 1.5. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) and pregnancy-/neonate-related AEs of interest were recorded., Results: 687 pregnant women were vaccinated (Tdap: N = 341 control: N = 346). Superiority of the pertussis immune response (maternally transferred pertussis antibodies in cord blood) was demonstrated by the GMC ratios (Tdap/control): 16.1 (95% CI: 13.5-19.2) for anti-filamentous hemagglutinin, 20.7 (15.9-26.9) for anti-pertactin and 8.5 (7.0-10.2) for anti-pertussis toxoid. Rates of pregnancy-/neonate-related AEs of interest, solicited general and unsolicited AEs were similar between groups. None of the serious AEs reported throughout the study were considered related to maternal Tdap vaccination., Conclusions: Tdap vaccination during pregnancy resulted in high levels of pertussis antibodies in cord blood, was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile. This supports the recommendation of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy to prevent early-infant pertussis disease., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02377349., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: BC, MAC, NMes, NMey and SOK are employees of the GSK group of companies (GSK), and BC and NMes own GSK restricted shares. BT, MBEP, OGV, SAH and TN’s institutions received grants from GSK during the conduct of the study. KPP received grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council during the conduct of the study, and from MedImmune, Novavax and Pfizer outside the submitted work. FMT’s institution received financial support from GSK during the conduct of the study, as well as financial and non-financial support outside the submitted work; he also received personal fees from Pfizer, Novavax, MSD and Sanofi Pasteur; his institution also received financial support as trial fees from Ablynx, Jansen, Regeneron, Medimmune, Pfizer, MSD, Sanofi Pasteur, Novavax and Novartis, as well as non-financial support from Pfizer and MSD and grants from MSD and Astra Zeneca. LK is working as consultant for GSK. SAH is member of ad-hoc advisory committees for GSK and Sanofi Pasteur and he has a patent for novel triple adjuvant issued. AMG, CMP, GVZ, ICG, JEAF, MARZ, MCFM, MDCM, MMF, MV, PGM, PK, PM, YRE and ZS declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: There is limited data on the role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) blood quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in the diagnostic workup of congenital CMV (cCMV) infection., Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine if CMV blood qPCR at the time diagnosis could differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic infants according to the recent consensus classification., Study Design: Retrospective study of children diagnosed with cCMV infection at CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Canada, between 2008 and 2016. Cases for whom qPCR was done at baseline (<4 weeks of age) alongside a complete diagnostic workup were included. The association between CMV blood viral load (VL) and clinical severity group was determined. The probability of having moderate to severe symptoms was assessed using univariate logistic regression analysis., Results: Forty-seven patients were included in the analysis. Median VL was significantly higher among infants with moderate to severely symptomatic disease vs. those asymptomatic or asymptomatic with isolated sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) (13 736 vs. 1876 copies/ml, p = 0.004), infants with moderate to severe disease or asymptomatic with isolated SNHL vs. asymptomatic (17 736 vs. 1496 copies/ml, p < 0.001), and in infants with baseline neurological involvement vs. those without (17 317 vs. 2641 copies/ml, p = 0.03). Using logistic regression, an infant would have a >75 % probability of being moderate to severely symptomatic above 18 770 copies/ml, with a threshold of 100 000 copies/ml approaching a 100 % probability., Conclusions: Our baseline assessment of CMV blood VL suggests that that the level of CMV viremia correlates with symptom severity., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Growing evidence suggests receipt of live-attenuated viral vaccines after solid organ transplant (SOT) has occurred and is safe and needed due to lapses in herd immunity. A 2-day consortium of experts in infectious diseases, transplantation, vaccinology, and immunology was held with the objective to review evidence and create expert recommendations for clinicians when considering live viral vaccines post-SOT. For consideration of VV and MMR post-transplant, evidence exists only for kidney and liver transplant recipients. For MMR vaccine post-SOT, consider vaccination during outbreak or travel to endemic risk areas. Patients who have received antiproliferative agents (eg. mycophenolate mofetil), T cell-depleting agents, or rituximab; or have persistently elevated EBV viral loads, or are in a state of functional tolerance, should be vaccinated with caution and have a more in-depth evaluation to define benefit of vaccination and net state of immune suppression prior to considering vaccination. MMR and/or VV (not combined MMRV) is considered to be safe in patients who are clinically well, are greater than 1 year after liver or kidney transplant and 2 months after acute rejection episode, can be closely monitored, and meet specific criteria of "low-level" immune suppression as defined in the document., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

BackgroundMany countries are grappling with growing numbers of parents who delay or refuse recommended vaccinations for their children. This has created a need for strategies to address vaccine hesitancy (VH) and better support parental decision-making regarding vaccination.AimTo assess vaccination intention (VI) and VH among parents who received an individual motivational-interview (MI) based intervention on infant immunisation during post-partum stay at a maternity ward between March 2014 and February 2015.MethodsThis non-controlled pre-/post-intervention study was conducted using the results from parents enrolled in the intervention arm of the PromoVaQ randomised control trial (RCT), which was conducted in four maternity wards across the Province of Quebec. Participants (n = 1,223) completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires on VI and VH using Opel's score. Pre-/post-intervention measures were compared using McNemar's test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous variables.ResultsPre-intervention: overall VI was 78% and significantly differed across maternity wards (74%, 77%, 84%, 79%, p = 0.02). Post-intervention: VI rose significantly across maternity wards (89%, 85%, 95%, 93%) and the overall increase in VI was 12% (78% vs 90%, p < 0.0001). VH corroborated these observations, pre- vs post-intervention, for each maternity ward (28% vs 16%, 29% vs 21%, 27% vs 17%, 24% vs 13%). Overall, VH was curbed post-intervention by 40% (27% vs 16%; p < 0.0001).ConclusionsCompared with pre-intervention status, participants who received the MI-based intervention on immunisation displayed lower hesitancy and greater intention to vaccinate their infant at 2 months of age.

Background: Despite growing interest in universal screening for congenital CMV infection (cCMV), and data to support treatment for cases with central nervous system (CNS) involvement, there is limited regarding the optimal imaging modalities to identify CNS involvement. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between head ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), in identifying neurological abnormalities in infants with cCMV infection, and to determine whether the addition of advanced neuroimaging after US had an impact on clinical management., Methods: Retrospective review of infants with cCMV infection, referred to the Centre d'Infectiologie Mère-Enfant (CIME) at Sainte-Justine Hospital Center in Montreal, between 2008 and 2016. Only patients who underwent head US followed by and brain MRI or CT scan were included in this analysis., Results: Of 46 cases of cCMV identified during the study period, 34 (74%) had a head US followed by MRI (n = 28, 61%), or CT scan (n = 6, 13%). In the majority of cases (n = 24, 71%), both images were concordant (11 both reported abnormal, 13 both reported normal). In 5 cases, US was reported normal and subsequent imaging (MRI = 4, CT = 1); reported abnormal. In all 5 cases patients were clinically symptomatic and met treatment criteria even in the absence of neuroimaging findings. In 5 cases, US was reported abnormal with a subsequent normal MRI (4) or CT (1); in 2 of these cases, patients were clinically symptomatic and met treatment criteria regardless of neuroimaging findings. However, in 3 cases, the patients were clinically asymptomatic, and in 2 of these cases, treated based only on the abnormal US findings., Conclusions: In this study, we found that that sequential US and MRI were concordant in the majority (71%) of cases in detecting abnormalities potentially associated with cCMV infection. While the addition of MRI to baseline head ultrasound did not influence the decision to treat in clinically symptomatic infants, the addition of MRI to infants with abnormal HUS imaging who are clinically asymptomatic could help refine treatment decisions in these cases.

Background: Vaccination has a huge public health impact. Maintaining vaccine coverage is key to avoid the devastating consequences of resurgence. In the Province of Québec, vaccine coverage in young children are sub-optimal, mostly due to ambivalence toward vaccine safety and efficacy. We previously conducted a regional study in the Québec's Eastern Townships region, the PromoVac Study, to test a new educational intervention, based on motivational interviewing techniques, aimed at promoting infant vaccination. This first study evidenced that the intervention led to a marked increase in mothers' intention to vaccinate, and vaccine coverage in their infants. The current study protocol aims at scaling up these results at a provincial level using a randomized controlled trial design., Methods: This pragmatic, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of the motivational interviewing to an educational intervention, including the distribution of an information flyer as standard of care on vaccination coverage in four maternity wards across the Province of Québec (PromovaQ). Adult mothers of children born in participating maternity wards were recruited between March 2014 and February 2015. Vaccination coverage will be assessed at 3-years of age, thus the trial is expected to be completed in March 2019. Statistical analyses will be conducted under the intention-to-treat principle. Vaccine coverage will be analyzed using Chi-squared distribution testing and logistic regression to identify determinant factors. Secondary outcomes will include vaccine hesitation and intention scores, mother's knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about immunization, and psychosocial determinants of intention to vaccinate., Discussion: In the case results of this Provincial RCT be confirmed, serious consideration should then be given by Ministry of Health authorities to the possible implementation of MI-based strategies across provincial maternity wards. To ensure adequate input and secure implementation, study design and results will be reviewed with relevant stakeholders, including the children's families, and provincial and regional decision-makers. Results will be adapted and shared with all stakeholders., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02666872 (Retrospectively registered as January 28, 2016).

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of pneumonia and bronchiolitis in children. Mortality rates in previously healthy children hospitalized with RSV are <0.5%, but up to 37% in patients with underlying medical conditions. The objective of this study was to characterize factors associated with deaths among children hospitalized with RSV infection in Canadian pediatric centers., Methods: A retrospective case series of children aged ≤18 years with RSV-associated deaths at centers affiliated with the Pediatric Investigators Collaborative Network on Infections in Canada from 2003–2013, inclusive, was performed [corrected]. Cases were identified using RSV-specific International Classification of Diseases codes to capture deaths where a diagnosis of RSV infection was present., Results: Eleven centers reported 79 RSV-associated deaths. RSV was regarded as primarily responsible for death in 32 cases (40.5%). Median age at death was 11 months (range, <1 month to 16 years). Thirty-nine patients (49.4%) were male. Fourteen patients (17.7%) had no known risk factors for severe RSV infection. Healthcare-associated RSV infections (HAIs) accounted for 29 deaths (36.7%), with RSV judged to be the primary cause of death in 9 of these cases., Conclusions: RSV-associated deaths were predominantly associated with chronic medical conditions and immunocompromised states among infants; however, 1 in 5 deaths occurred among patients with no known risk factors for severe RSV. Mortality associated with HAI accounted for over a third of cases. These findings highlight patient groups that should be targeted for RSV prevention strategies such as infection control practices, immunoprophylaxis, and future vaccination programs.

Background: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is a growing problem. The first step in addressing VH is to have an understanding of who are the hesitant individuals and what are their specific concerns. The aim of this survey was to assess mothers' level of vaccine hesitancy and vaccination knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs., Methods: Mothers of newly-born infants in four maternity wards in Quebec (Canada) completed a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire included items to assess VH and intention to vaccinate. VH scores were calculated using the Parents Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) survey. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine variables associated with intention to vaccinate (OR; 95% CI)., Results: Overall, 2645 questionnaires were included in this analysis and 77.5% of respondents certainly intended to vaccinate their infant at 2 months of age. Based on the PACV 100-point scale, 56.4% of mothers had a 0 to ˂30 score (low level of VH); 28.6% had a 30 to ˂50 and 15.0% had a score of 50 and higher (high level of VH).The main determinants of mothers' intention to vaccinate were the perceived importance of vaccinating infants at 2 months of age (OR = 9.2; 5.9-14.5) and a low score of VH (OR = 7.4; 5.3-10.3)., Discussion: Although the majority of mothers held positive attitudes toward vaccination, a large proportion were moderately or highly vaccine hesitant. Mothers' level of VH was strongly associated with their intention to vaccinate their infants, showing the potential detrimental impact of VH on vaccine uptake rates and the importance of addressing this phenomenon.

Background: Immunization of pregnant women with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) provides protection against pertussis to the newborn infant., Methods: In a randomized, controlled, observer-blind, multicenter clinical trial, we measured the safety and immunogenicity of Tdap during pregnancy and the effect on the infant's immune response to primary vaccination at 2, 4, and 6 months and booster vaccination at 12 months of age. A total of 273 women received either Tdap or tetanus-diphtheria (Td) vaccine in the third trimester and provided information for the safety analysis and samples for the immunogenicity analyses; 261 infants provided serum for the immunogenicity analyses., Results: Rates of adverse events were similar in both groups. Infants of Tdap recipients had cord blood levels that were 21% higher than maternal levels for pertussis toxoid (PT), 13% higher for filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), 4% higher for pertactin (PRN), and 7% higher for fimbriae (FIM). These infants had significantly higher PT antibody levels at birth and at 2 months and significantly higher FHA, PRN, and FIM antibodies at birth and 2 and 4 months, but significantly lower PT and FHA antibody levels at 6 and 7 months and significantly lower PRN and FIM antibody levels at 7 months than infants whose mothers received Td. Differences persisted prebooster at 12 months for all antigens and postbooster 1 month later for PT, FHA, and FIM., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that Tdap during pregnancy results in higher levels of antibodies early in infancy but lower levels after the primary vaccine series., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00553228.

Background: Under-immunization refers to a state of sub-optimal protection against vaccine preventable diseases. Vaccine coverage for age may not capture intentional or non-intentional spacing of vaccines in the recommended provincial immunization guidelines. We aimed to identify factors associated with coverage and under-immunization and to determine the number of days during which children were under-immunized during their first 24months of life., Methods: Secondary analysis of children ≤3years recruited through active surveillance for gastroenteritis from three Quebec pediatric emergency departments from 2012 to 2014. Vaccination status for children at least 24months of age was determined using provincial immunization guidelines. Cumulative days under-immunized were calculated for DTaP-VPI-Hib, PCV, MMR, and Men-C-C. Factors associated with up-to-date (UTD) status at 24months of life and for under-immunization ≥6months were analyzed using logistic regression., Results: Of 246 eligible children, 180 (73%) were UTD by 24months of life. The mean cumulative days under-immunized for MMR was 107days, for PCV 209days, for Men-C-C 145days, and for DTaP-VPI-Hib 227days. Overall, 149 children (60%) experienced delay for at least 1 vaccine. Factors associated with both an UTD status at 24months and concurrently associated with being under-immunization ≥6months, included timely initiation of immunization (OR=5.85; 95% CI: 2.80-12.22) and (OR=0.13; 95% CI: 0.07-0.24), failure to co-administer 18-month vaccines (OR=0.15; 95% CI: 0.10-0.21) and (OR=3.29; 95% CI: 2.47-4.39), and having a household with ≥3 children under 18years ((OR=0.50; 0.28-0.86) and (OR=2.99; 1.45-6.22), respectively., Conclusion: Paired with an unexpected low level of coverage at 24months of life, the majority of our cohort also experienced a state of under-immunization for a least one vaccine. Estimates of coverage do not capture intentional or non-intentional gaps in protection from vaccine preventable illnesses. Timely preventive care should be prioritized., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection have generated a mounting interest in identifying mothers susceptible to CMV. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prevalence and socio-demographic determinants of CMV susceptibility and CMV awareness, among pregnant women, in Montreal, Quebec., Methods: Between April and December 2012, women delivering at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte Justine were recruited for the study. Stored serum from the first trimester of pregnancy was tested for CMV IgG. Knowledge about CMV and socio-demographic characteristics were collected via standardized questionnaire., Results: Four hundred and ninety one women were enrolled in the study. Overall, 225 mothers (46%) were seronegative for CMV, and 85% (n = 415) were unaware of CMV or the associated risks in pregnancy. Significant risk factors for CMV seronegative status included Canadian vs. foreign born (aOR 6.88, 95% CI 4.33-10.94), and high vs. low family income (aOR 4.68, 95% CI 2.09-10.48). Maternal employment status was the only significant predictor of CMV unawareness, with unemployed mothers at the highest risk (aOR 85.6, 95% CI 17.3-421.3)., Conclusions: Nearly half of pregnant women studied were at risk of primary infection, and yet, the majority was unaware of potential risks associated with CMV. Canadian born mothers and those with a high socioeconomic status were more likely to be CMV seronegative. Increased education about CMV infection, through public health interventions and obstetrician/pediatric counseling, is needed for all pregnant women.

Background and Objectives: We assessed monovalent rotavirus (RV1) vaccine effectiveness (VE) in a high-income setting with RV1 predominant use, and examined the burden of pediatric rotavirus gastroenteritis following the implementation of an RV1-only vaccination program., Methods: We conducted active rotavirus gastroenteritis surveillance among children 8 weeks to <3 years of age at three hospitals. Participant information and vaccination histories were collected via parent/guardian interview and medical records. Stool specimens were tested for rotavirus; positive specimens were genotyped. The effect of increasing RV1 coverage on rotavirus prevalence was examined as a weekly time series via binomial regression with a log link function, using either categorical season or mean 2-dose rotavirus seasonal vaccine coverage as the exposure variable. As compared with RV1 vaccine formulation, rotavirus genotypes were classified as homotypic, partly-heterotypic, or heterotypic; prevalence of each was compared by season. A test-negative case-control design was used to examine RV1 VE against hospitalization or emergency visits., Results: We enrolled 866 participants in active surveillance; of these, 384 (44.3%) were eligible for VE analyses. After adjustment for season, we detected a 70.1% (95% CI: 21.9%, 88.6%) relative decrease in rotavirus prevalence in the 2013-14 season compared with 2012-13 season. On average, a 1% increase in ≥2-dose rotavirus coverage among children 1 year of age was associated with a 3.8% (95% CI: 1.8%, 5.8%) relative decrease in rotavirus prevalence. Rotavirus homotypic strain prevalence decreased, with 77% (95% CI: 68%, 89%) versus 8% (95% CI: 0%, 36%) prevalence during the 2011-12 and 2013-14 seasons, respectively. Adjusted 2-dose RV1 VE was 91.2% (95% CI: 61.6%, 98.0%)., Conclusions: RV1 vaccine was highly effective to prevent rotavirus hospitalizations and emergency visits among children <3 years of age in a high-income setting with its predominant use. Our estimates were similar to high-income settings with concurrent RV1 and pentavalent vaccine use., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Parental immunization ("cocooning") is a potentially effective strategy to protect neonates against Bordetella pertussis. The objective of this study was to evaluate three approaches to parental immunization: (1) current practice (single dTap dose to adolescents, one additional dose recommended in adults); (2) promotion of vaccination in the maternity ward, with vaccine offered in the community; and (3) promotion and administration of vaccine in the maternity ward., Methods: We conducted a two-phase study of postpartum women in a tertiary care obstetric-pediatric hospital in Montreal, Canada. In Phase I, mothers completed a standardized questionnaire regarding pertussis knowledge, attitudes and immunization status. Interviews provided information on cocooning and pertussis vaccination, and invited parents to receive the vaccine in the community. In phase II, information was provided (no questionnaire) with vaccination offered in the maternity ward before discharge., Results: Phase I included 101 participants; Phase II, 244. Baseline knowledge on infant disease severity and adult vaccine recommendations was poor. Only 6% of women were considered protected. In Phase I, 56.3% and 62.5% of eligible mothers and fathers, respectively, were willing to receive the vaccine; only 5.4% and 8.7% were immunized in the community. In Phase II, 53.1% and 62.6% of mothers and fathers, respectively, would accept vaccination; 46.9% of mothers and 60.5% of fathers were immunized onsite (p<0.01)., Conclusion: Offering dTap vaccine in the maternity ward is an effective approach to promote cocooning and increase vaccine uptake. The generalizability and cost effectiveness of this strategy should be investigated further., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)