Search

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) include opioid agonist therapies (OAT) (buprenorphine and methadone), and opioid antagonists (extended-release naltrexone). All forms of MOUD improve opioid use disorder (OUD) and HIV outcomes. However, the integration of services for HIV and OUD remains inadequate. Persistent barriers to accessing MOUD underscore the immediate necessity of addressing pharmacoequity in the treatment of OUD in persons with HIV (PWH). In this review article, we specifically focus on OAT among PWH, as it is the most commonly utilized form of MOUD. Specifically, we delineate the intersection of HIV and OUD services, emphasizing their integration into the United States Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) plan by offering comprehensive screening, testing, and treatment for both HIV and OUD. We identify potential drug interactions of OAT with antiretroviral therapy (ART), address disparities in OAT access, and present the practical benefits of long-acting formulations of buprenorphine, ART, and pre-exposure prophylaxis for improving HIV prevention and treatment and OUD management. Optimizing OUD outcomes in PWH necessitates careful attention to diagnosing OUD, initiating OUD treatment, and ensuring medication retention. Innovative approaches to healthcare delivery, such as mobile pharmacies, can integrate both OUD and HIV and reach underserved populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hospitalizations are increasing among persons who use opioids, secondary to overdose and infections. Our study identified acute hospitalization as a reachable moment for engaging people who use drugs in increased screening and education about human immunodeficiency virus risk and prevention (preexposure prophylaxis). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The potential and threat of digital tools to achieve health equity has been highlighted for over a decade, but the success of achieving equitable access to health technologies remains challenging. Our paper addresses renewed concerns regarding equity in digital health access that were deepened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our viewpoint is that (1) digital health tools have the potential to improve health equity if equitable access is achieved, and (2) improving access and equity in digital health can be strengthened by considering behavioral science-based strategies embedded in all phases of tool development. Using behavioral, equity, and access frameworks allowed for a unique and comprehensive exploration of current drivers of digital health inequities. This paper aims to present a compilation of strategies that can potentially have an actionable impact on digital health equity. Multilevel factors drive unequal access, so strategies require action from tool developers, individual delivery agents, organizations, and systems to effect change. Strategies were shaped with a behavioral medicine focus as the field has a unique role in improving digital health access; arguably, all digital tools require the user (individual, provider, and health system) to change behavior by engaging with the technology to generate impact. This paper presents a model that emphasizes using multilevel strategies across design, delivery, dissemination, and sustainment stages to advance digital health access and foster health equity., (©Maura M Kepper, Lauren A Fowler, Isabelle S Kusters, Jean W Davis, Manal Baqer, Sara Sagui-Henson, Yunyu Xiao, Adati Tarfa, Jean C Yi, Bryan Gibson, Kristin E Heron, Nicole M Alberts, Marissa Burgermaster, Veronica PS Njie-Carr, Lisa M Klesges. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 01.08.2024.)

Background: People with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PWH) experience barriers to care within the community that impedes their progress from when they discover that they are HIV positive to becoming virally suppressed. For individuals with HIV to achieve sustained viral suppression, they must be linked to care to start receiving anti-retroviral therapy and remain retained in care for continuous treatment. However, HIV surveillance data shows that many PWH are not linked to care and become lost to continuous follow-up care. Although pharmacists, PWH, and social workers interact with one another and are aware of their roles in HIV care, their perspectives on barriers to linkage and retention in care have not been investigated collectively., Objectives: Explore the perspectives of PWH, pharmacists, and social workers on barriers to linkage and retention of HIV care within the community setting., Methods: Convenience sampling was used to recruit 15 stakeholders (five PWH, five community pharmacists, and five social workers) who participated in 1-h, semi-structured interviews based on three domains of the Patient-centered Medical Home Model including (1) experiences (individual and system-level barriers to care experienced by PWH), (2) activities (social workers and pharmacists initiatives that impact adherence to care)and (3) interventions (critical issues pharmacists can address in the community to engage PWH in their HIV care). We conducted a directed content analysis based on deductive coding. To establish rigor, we focused on Lincoln and Guba's criteria of rigorous qualitative methodology: credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability. Similarities and divergences of themes were discussed during data analysis and agreement was reached before interpretation., Results: Emergent themes uncovered barriers to linkage and retention in HIV care as HIV-related stigma, having mental health illnesses including a history of substance abuse and social determinants of health such as homelessness, food insecurity, and insurance issues., Conclusion: The perspectives of pharmacists, social workers, and PWH can provide insight into barriers that should be identified and addressed in people living with HIV to enhance their linkage and retention in care., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.)