Search

Abdulaziz A Asiri,1 Khalil W AlQahtani,1 Mohammed Y Tarrosh,2 Amal S Shaiban,3 Hamed A Al Shawkani,2 Wafa H Alaajam,3 Maryam S Bamasud,4 Muqbil Alqahtani,5 Mohanad A Alyousefy,6 Mohammed M Al Moaleem7,8 1Endodontic Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia; 3Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia; 4Dental Department, Ministry of Health, Sakaka City, Jouf Region, Saudi Arabia; 5General Practitioner, King Faisal University, Alhafuf City, Saudi Arabia; 6Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen; 7Department of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, 45142, Saudi Arabia; 8Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ibn al-Nafis for Medical Sciences, Sana’a, 4337, YemenCorrespondence: Mohammed M Al Moaleem, Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Tel +00966-550599553, Email malmoaleem@jazanu.edu.sa; drlmoaleem2014@gmail.comAim: The root morphology and canal configuration (RMCC) of mandibular and maxillary canines among Saudi population is systematically reviewed and compared with international studies in this research.Methods: This study was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. The electronic databases of PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Wiley Library, Google website search, and Web of Science were searched. Only local and international cross-sectional, comparative, evaluation, and validation studies or case reports published between 2016 and 2022 that directly evaluated canine RMCC and assessed participants using cone beam computed tomography were included.Results: Forty-three studies that investigated RMCCs (17 local and 26 international) were involved in this review. The original Saudi research recorded that almost 100% of maxillary canines had one root and one canal, whereas 98.4% and 94.1% had one root and one canal in the mandibular arch. Vertucci’s class I had the highest percentages in the maxillary and mandibular arches at 98.3% and 95.8%, respectively, followed by class III with 0.7% and 1.9% for the same arches, respectively. International studies recorded that 100% of maxillary canines had one canal and root; the percentages of the mandibular arch were 92.3 and 98% for single canal and root, respectively; and the highest percentage was obtained by Vertucci’s class I (91.1%), followed by class III (4.7%).Conclusion: This review reports and confirmed the symmetry of the RMCCs of maxillary and mandibular canines between Saudi studies and other populations. Moreover, Vertucci’s classes I and III were the most frequent RMCCs, and two-rooted canines in both arches were considerably less frequently than single-rooted ones.Keywords: Vertucci’s classification, mandibular canine, maxillary canine, root morphology, canal configuration, number of canals, number of roots, Saudi population

This study aimed to conduct a compendious review of root canal morphology of "permanent mandibular teeth in different regions of Saudi Arabia" to obtain a large sample representing the total population. A detailed search through the databases Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The data were analyzed based on the following inclusion criteria: original full-length original articles that reported the variables of interest "(number of roots, number of canals, Vertucci's classification system and C-shaped canals or mid-mesial canals)" of the mandibular teeth and conducted on Saudi subjects. The retrieved data were presented as frequencies and percentages. The results revealed that 56.6% of mandibular central incisors had one canal and Vertucci type I (56.6%), while 57.4% of the mandibular lateral incisors had one canal, with Vertucci types I and III most frequent. In mandibular canines, 91.8% had one canal and 8.2% had two canals. Most of the mandibular first premolars had one root (86.6%), while almost all mandibular second premolars (91.5%) had one canal, and 96.9% had Vertucci type I configuration. Among the mandibular first molars, three and four canals were prevalent in 58.7% and 40.6%, respectively. The majority of mesial roots had Vertucci type IV (60.6%), and most of distal roots had Vertucci type I (72.2%). Most of the mandibular second molars had three canals (87.3%) and showed Vertucci type IV (39.4%) canals for mesial roots and Vertucci type I (95.6%) for distal roots. The C-shaped canals were seen in 8% of first premolars and 9.8% of second molars. The middle mesial canal was found in 4.2% and 0.4% of first and second molars, respectively. This review could represent "the population of Saudi Arabia as the included samples were combined from different regions of the country." Some variations were noticed within the same group of teeth from different regions. However, the overall results of combined samples were comparable to the other international studies., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Mohammed Mashyakhy et al.)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of XP Shaper (XP), HyFlex EDM One File (EDM), and WaveOne Gold Primary (WOG) when operated according to their manufacturers' recommendations at different lengths and to investigate the cyclic fatigue limit of XP Shaper when operated at 3000 rpm., Methods: One hundred fifty instruments from 4 different rotary systems (F2 Protaper Universal [PTU], WOG, EDM, and XP) were tested for their cyclic fatigue resistance in a simulated 90° curved canal at a 37°C water bath temperature at 3 different working lengths (15 mm, 17 mm, and 19 mm). The time taken for instruments to fracture was recorded, and the number of cycles to failure was calculated. Statistical analyses were performed by using Levene's test, Kruskal-Wallis test to identify specific groups with statistically significantly higher cyclic fatigue resistance at 5% significance level. Weibull analysis was performed to determine the predictability of survival for each instrument., Results: XP Shaper had the highest cyclic fatigue resistance compared with all other instruments, followed by EDM, WOG, and then PTU. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of cycles to failure between the XP operated at 3000 or 1000 rpm in any of the tested working lengths. There was a reduction in the number of cycles to failure when the working length increased from 15 to 19 mm in EDM, WOG, and PTU. Scanning electron microscopy showed ductile fractures with classic dimpled features in all samples., Conclusions: XP has a very high resistance to cyclic fatigue compared with WOG, EDM, and F2 PTU. The time to fracture will decrease by almost one third when XP is operated at 3000 rpm. The results of both parts of this study suggest that XP appears to be safe to operate at 3000 rpm in endodontic retreatment., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the performance of 3 single-file systems: WaveOne Gold Primary (WOG; Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Hyflex EDM "one file" (EDM; Coltene/Whaledent, Alstatten, Switzerland), and XP Shaper (XP; FKG, La Chaux de Fonds, Switzerland), for nonsurgical endodontic retreatment on mandibular anterior teeth in regard to the amount of remaining filling material inside the canal, debris extrusion, and operation time., Methods: Sixty extracted standardized mandibular incisors presenting with a single oval canal were prepared to size 30.04 and obturated using warm vertical condensation. After 30 days (37°C, 100% humidity), teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 20) according to the file used for retreatment (WOG, EDM, or XP operated at 3000 rpm). During the retreatment procedures, preweighed vials were used to collect apically extruded debris, and the time required to remove the filling material was recorded in seconds. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans were taken before and after the retreatment to determine the amount of remaining filling material inside the root canal space. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, 1-way analysis of variance, and the Pearson test at a 5% significance level., Results: There was a statistically significant difference among the groups regarding the instrumentation time (P < .05). XP was the fastest to remove gutta-percha from the canals (40.54 ± 28.03 seconds) followed by EDM (55.77 ± 19.76 seconds) and WOG (105.92 ± 53.92 seconds). The percentage of remaining filling was significantly greater for WOG (26.65% ± 14.63%) (P < .05). No difference was found between EDM (13.51% ± 9.53%) and XP (8.60% ± 7.28%). No difference was found regarding the amount of extruded debris among the 3 groups (P > .05)., Conclusions: XP was the most efficient in gutta-percha removal from the canals when operated at a higher speed (3000 rpm) followed by EDM and WOG., (Copyright © 2018 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)