Search

Purpose: To explore whether patients with BRCA1/2-mutated or homologous recombination deficient (HRD) ovarian cancers benefitted from atezolizumab in the phase III IMagyn050 (NCT03038100) trial. Patients and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer were randomized to either atezolizumab or placebo with standard chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) was determined centrally (VENTANA SP142 assay). Genomic alterations, including deleterious BRCA1/2 alterations, genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI), were evaluated using the FoundationOne assay. HRD was defined as gLOH ≥ 16%, regardless of BRCA1/2 mutation status. Potential associations between progression-free survival (PFS) and genomic biomarkers were evaluated using standard correlation analyses and log-rank of Kaplan–Meier estimates. Results: Among biomarker-evaluable samples, 22% (234/1,050) harbored BRCA1/2 mutations and 46% (446/980) were HRD. Median TMB was low irrespective of BRCA1/2 or HRD. Only 3% (29/1,024) had TMB ≥10 mut/Mb, and 0.3% (3/1,022) were MSI-high. PFS was better in BRCA2-mutated versus BRCA2–non-mutated tumors and in HRD versus proficient tumors. PD-L1 positivity (≥1% expression on ICs) was associated with HRD but not BRCA1/2 mutations. PFS was not improved by adding atezolizumab in BRCA2-mutated or HRD tumors; there was a trend toward enhanced PFS with atezolizumab in BRCA1-mutated tumors. Conclusions: Most ovarian tumors have low TMB despite BRCA1/2 mutations or HRD. Neither BRCA1/2 mutation nor HRD predicted enhanced benefit from atezolizumab. This is the first randomized double-blind trial in ovarian cancer demonstrating that genomic instability triggered by BRCA1/2 mutation or HRD is not associated with improved sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. See related commentary by Al-Rawi et al., p. 1645

PFS by treatment arm according to TMB status (stratified by treatment approach, disease stage, and ECOG PS). A, TMB-low population. B, TMB-high population. CPB, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab.

Purpose:To explore whether patients with BRCA1/2-mutated or homologous recombination deficient (HRD) ovarian cancers benefitted from atezolizumab in the phase III IMagyn050 (NCT03038100) trial.Patients and Methods:Patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer were randomized to either atezolizumab or placebo with standard chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) was determined centrally (VENTANA SP142 assay). Genomic alterations, including deleterious BRCA1/2 alterations, genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI), were evaluated using the FoundationOne assay. HRD was defined as gLOH ≥ 16%, regardless of BRCA1/2 mutation status. Potential associations between progression-free survival (PFS) and genomic biomarkers were evaluated using standard correlation analyses and log-rank of Kaplan–Meier estimates.Results:Among biomarker-evaluable samples, 22% (234/1,050) harbored BRCA1/2 mutations and 46% (446/980) were HRD. Median TMB was low irrespective of BRCA1/2 or HRD. Only 3% (29/1,024) had TMB ≥10 mut/Mb, and 0.3% (3/1,022) were MSI-high. PFS was better in BRCA2-mutated versus BRCA2–non-mutated tumors and in HRD versus proficient tumors. PD-L1 positivity (≥1% expression on ICs) was associated with HRD but not BRCA1/2 mutations. PFS was not improved by adding atezolizumab in BRCA2-mutated or HRD tumors; there was a trend toward enhanced PFS with atezolizumab in BRCA1-mutated tumors.Conclusions:Most ovarian tumors have low TMB despite BRCA1/2 mutations or HRD. Neither BRCA1/2 mutation nor HRD predicted enhanced benefit from atezolizumab. This is the first randomized double-blind trial in ovarian cancer demonstrating that genomic instability triggered by BRCA1/2 mutation or HRD is not associated with improved sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors.See related commentary by Al-Rawi et al., p. 1645

CCNE1 amplifications are mutually exclusive with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

PFS according to homologous recombination and BRCA1/2 status in the subgroup of patients with IC ≥5%.

Background: Tumor biomarkers such as CD8 density and location (i.e., immune inflamed phenotype) and immune rich molecular subtype have been linked to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) overall survival (OS) in different cancers. The IMagyn050 trial (NCT03038100), which evaluated the efficacy of Atezo vs placebo (Pla) with carboplatin, paclitaxel and bevacizumab (CPB) in front line ovarian cancer patient (pts), did not meet its co-primary endpoints of PFS in ITT or PD-L1+ (Moore et al. JCO 2021). In the current IMagyn050 substudy we assessed potential predictive tumor immune biomarkers for Atezo clinical benefit. Methods: FFPE tumors from the biomarker evaluable population were tested for PD-L1 IHC, CD8/PanCK IHC (total CD8 T cells and immune location phenotypes [inflamed, excluded, desert]) and RNA-seq (to derive molecular subtypes, biological pathways and cellular components [xCELL]) in tissue from baseline (n=860), on-treatment (OT, 9 weeks, n=233), intra- (n=8) and inter-lesion (n=12) matched samples. Hazard ratio (HR) interaction test from multivariate adjusted Cox-regression analysis for PFS and OS was performed to test predictive biomarkers. Results: While tumors with CD8 T cells, immunoreactive molecular subtypes or immune inflamed phenotype were enriched for PD-L1+, only pts with immune inflamed tumors showed improved OS Atezo benefit (HR 0.67). Improved Atezo PFS/OS benefit was also observed in pts with whose tumors had high oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS, HR: 0.72/0.65) and UV Response (UV, HR: 0.64/0.58) but not IFNγ response. Plasma B cells were linked to improved OS Atezo benefit vs Pla (HR 0.53). We leveraged OT samples from pts in the neoadjuvant cohort to assess treatment effect on the tumor microenvironment. Analyses showed that CPB reduced tumor proliferation and increased tumor immune inflammation (CD8 T cells, PD-L1 and IFNα/IFNγ response), further increased by Atezo. Immune inflammation is challenging in ovarian cancer due to extensive tumor heterogeneity. Prevalence of tumor biomarkers varied by anatomic locations: total CD8, CD8 localization and molecular subtypes. Inter- and intra-lesion biomarker status within the same pt showed PD-L1 and plasma B cells as most consistent. Molecular subtypes and immune phenotypes had moderate intra-lesion agreement but discordant between lesions. PD-L1 and OXPHOS were the only biomarkers linked to Atezo benefit regardless of anatomical location. Conclusion: This comprehensive exploratory study suggests that DNA damage, OXPHOS, plasma B cells and immune inflamed tumors, but not molecular subtypes or total CD8 T cells, may predict Atezo + CPB OS. This treatment promotes immune inflammation in OC tumors. Notably, we found that several biomarkers are highly heterogeneous. Our findings highlight the challenges of achieving durable clinical benefit from targeted immunotherapy in ovarian cancer pts. Citation Format: Venkatesh Krishnan, Ching-Wei Chang, Habib Hamidi, Michael A. Bookman, Charles Landen, Tashanna Myers, Hiroaki Kajiyama, Sakari Hietanen, Lyndsay Willmott, Premal Thaker, Cagatay Taskiran, Jalid Sehouli, Victor Khor, Yvonne Lin Liu, Sandro Pignata, Kathleen Moore, Luciana Molinero. Ovarian cancer tumor microenvironment and atezolizumab (atezo) clinical activity: IMagyn050 sub-study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5702.

Objectives: Genomically unstable tumors, characterized by BRCA1/2 alterations and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), are hypothesized to be more mutated and potentially more sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. To explore this hypothesis we analyzed outcomes in the IMagyn050 trial according to BRCA1/2, HRD, and PD-L1 status [Moore, ESMO 2020]. Methods: IMagyn050 (NCT03038100) is a double-blind randomized phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of adding atezolizumab/placebo to carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (CPB) followed by maintenance bevacizumab plus atezolizumab/placebo. PD-L1 status was determined centrally using VENTANA SP142 (PD-L1+ defined as ≥1% tumor-infiltrating immune cells expressing PD-L1). Deleterious tumor germline/somatic BRCA1/2 alterations (BRCA1/2m), genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) were evaluated using the FoundationOne assay (Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA). HRD and homologous recombination proficiency (HRP) were defined as gLOH ≥16% and Results: Among 1301 randomized patients, samples from 1050 were evaluable for BRCA1/2 (22% were BRCA1/2m, 78% BRCA1/2 nonmutant) and 980 were evaluable for gLOH (46% were HRD, 54% HRP). Median TMB was similarly low in BRCA1/2m and BRCA1/2 nonmutant (3.78 vs 2.52 Mut/Mb, respectively), and HRD and HRP (3.78 vs 2.52 Mut/Mb, respectively) tumors. Only 3% (29/1024) of evaluable tumors had TMB ≥10 Mut/Mb and 0.3% (3/1022) were MSI-high (1 mixed, 1 undifferentiated, 1 other). All high-grade serous cases were MS-stable. PFS prognosis (assessed in the placebo + CPB arm) was improved in patients with BRCA1/2m (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% CI 0.46–0.84) and HRD (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49–0.80) tumors. There was a suggested association between PD-L1+ and HRD (HRD prevalence: 40% vs 25% in PD-L1+ vs PD-L1– subgroups, respectively; exploratory Fisher's exact test p=0.0001) but not with BRCA1/2m (BRCA1/2m prevalence: 21% vs 14%, respectively; exploratory Fisher exact test p=0.064). Adding atezolizumab to CPB did not improve PFS, irrespective of BRCA1/2 or HRD status (table). In the PD-L1+ population, HRs were similar in BRCA1/2m and BRCA1/2 nonmutant subgroups, and in HRD and HRP subgroups. In the PD-L1– population, atezolizumab did not improve PFS. Download : Download high-res image (172KB) Download : Download full-size image Conclusions: We showed that the majority of ovarian tumors have low TMB scores regardless of BRCA1/2 or HRD. Neither BRCA1/2m nor HRD was associated with greater clinical benefit from adding atezolizumab to CPB. PD-L1 status was more reliably associated with numerically longer PFS with atezolizumab + CPB. This is the first randomized double-blind trial in ovarian cancer to demonstrate that genomic instability triggered by BRCA1/2m or HRD does not improve sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Objectives: Although primary results from the IMagyn050 trial showed no statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with atezo added to carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab (CPB) [Moore, ESMO 2020], the impact of this regimen on selected patient (pt)-reported ovarian cancer symptoms, function, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is unknown and the focus of this study. Methods: IMagyn050 is a double-blind randomized phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of adding atezo/placebo to CPB followed by maintenance bevacizumab + atezo/placebo. The trial includes two cohorts: neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and primary surgery (PS). Pts complete EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-OV28, and FACT-G single-item GP5 at baseline (BL) and at regular intervals during treatment and follow-up. In NACT pts, prespecified responder analyses (using a ≥10-point cutoff for clinically meaningful change) assessed improvement in abdominal pain (OV28 item 31) and bloating (OV28 item 32) at week 9, comparing treatment arms by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) testing. Additional secondary objectives in the NACT and PS cohorts were assessments of function (physical, role, emotional, social) and HRQoL, as measured by QLQ-C30 functional and global health status/quality of life scales. Exploratory endpoints included mean change from BL in symptoms (QLQ-C30 and OV28) and treatment side-effect bother (FACT-G GP5) in both cohorts. Results: Of 1301 randomized pts, completion rates for each of the 3 questionnaires were 83-100% at BL and >85% on treatment. In NACT pts, mean BL scores were similar in the atezo vs placebo arms for abdominal pain (40.2 vs 44.8) and bloating (50.4 vs 56.3). At week 9, there was no difference between treatments in the proportion of NACT pts with ≥10-point improvement in either symptom (abdominal pain: 69/136 [51%] with atezo vs 77/142 [54%] with placebo, CMH p=0.56; bloating: 74 [54%] vs 89 [63%], CMH p=0.14). Results were consistent when restricted to NACT pts with sufficient BL symptoms to show ≥10-point improvement. There was no difference between treatments in the proportion of NACT pts with improvement in function or HRQoL at week 9. In the PS cohort, similar proportions of pts in each arm showed on-treatment improvement, stabilization, or deterioration in function and HRQoL. In both cohorts, neither arm showed meaningful changes from BL in treatment-related symptoms and similar proportions of pts in both arms reported being ‘a little bit’ or ‘somewhat’ bothered by treatment side effects while on therapy. Conclusions: Consistent with PFS results, there were no differences between arms in the proportion of NACT pts with a clinically meaningful improvement in abdominal pain and bloating after 3 cycles of bevacizumab-containing therapy. Pt-reported outcome analyses in both cohorts showed that adding atezo to CPB did not increase treatment burden for pts, thereby demonstrating the tolerability of this 4-drug regimen and providing further insight on the benefit-risk assessment of atezo.

Purpose: to evaluate the addition of the humanized monoclonal antiprogrammed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody, atezolizumab, to platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab in newly diagnosed stage III or IV ovarian cancer (OC). Methods: this multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind randomized phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03038100) enrolled patients with newly diagnosed untreated International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or IV OC who either had undergone primary cytoreductive surgery with macroscopic residual disease or were planned to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgery. Patients were stratified by FIGO stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, tumor immune cell PD-L1 staining, and treatment strategy and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 3-weekly cycles of atezolizumab 1,200 mg or placebo (day 1, cycles 1-22), with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (day 1, cycles 1-6) plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (day 1, cycles 2-22), omitting perioperative bevacizumab in neoadjuvant patients. The co-primary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat and PD-L1-positive populations. Results: between March 8, 2017, and March 26, 2019, 1,301 patients were enrolled. The median progression-free survival was 19.5 versus 18.4 months with atezolizumab versus placebo, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.07; stratified log-rank P = .28), in the intention-to-treat population and 20.8 versus 18.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.99; P = .038), in the PD-L1-positive population. The interim (immature) overall survival results showed no significant benefit from atezolizumab. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (21% with atezolizumab v 21% with placebo), hypertension (18% v 20%, respectively), and anemia (12% v 12%). Conclusion: current evidence does not support the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in newly diagnosed OC. Insight from this trial should inform further evaluation of immunotherapy in OC., NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant

Introduction/Background Introduction: GROINSS-V II investigated whether radiotherapy is a safe alternative for inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) in vulvar cancer patients with a metastatic sentinel node (SN). Methodology Methods: In GROINSS-V II, a prospective multicentre phase II trial, patients were included with early-stage squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the vulva (diameter Results From December 2005 until October 2016, 1552 eligible patients were registered. SN-metastasis occurred in 324/1552 (21%) patients. After 54 months of inclusion the stopping-rule for SN-positive patients was activated; interim analysis showed an increased risk for groin recurrence in case of SN-metastasis >2 mm and/or extranodal extension (ENE). After amendment of the protocol only patients with SN-micrometastasis ≤2 mm received radiotherapy, while those with SN metastasis >2 mm underwent IFL (with radiotherapy if >1 metastasis or ENE). Final analysis after ≥2 years of follow-up revealed six isolated groin recurrences in 157 patients with a SN-micrometastasis (3.8%). Four could not be considered radiotherapy failures: two developed recurrence in the contralateral (SN-negative) groin, two refused radiotherapy. Twenty-eight patients did not get radiotherapy (2 recurrences;7.1%). Among 129 patients who received radiotherapy to the groin(s) only two isolated groin recurrences were diagnosed (1.6%: 95%CI:0–3.8%). The combination of radiotherapy with SN was associated with minimal toxicity: 5/118(4.2%) grade 3 toxicity, no grade 4 or 5 toxicity. In 38/1222 SN-negative patients (3.1%: 95%CI:2.1–4.1%) isolated groin recurrences were diagnosed with clear protocol violations in 6 patients: incomplete treatment of the groin (n=3); primary tumor >4cm (n=1); not all SNs visualized on the lymphoscintigram removed (n=2). After exclusion of these protocol violations an isolated groin recurrence rate of 2.6% (95%CI:1.7–3.5%) was observed. Conclusion Radiotherapy to the groins is a safe alternative for IFL in patients with SN metastasis ≤2 mm, with minimal toxicity. We further established the safety of omitting IFL in patients with SCC of the vulva 2 mm, radiotherapy with a total dose of 50Gy was no safe alternative for IFL; dose escalation and/or chemoradiation should be investigated in these patients. Disclosure Funded by Dutch Cancer Society.

(Abstracted from J Clin Oncol 2019;37:1380–1390)The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocol 172 demonstrated a median survival of 127.6 months with an intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy regimen compared with 82 months with an intravenous (IV) cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen in women with stage

PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of two different intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy regimens on progression-free survival (PFS) among women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian carcinoma. METHODS Eligible patients were randomly assigned to six cycles of IV paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 once per week with intravenous (IV) carboplatin area under the curve 6 (IV carboplatin) versus IV paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 once per week with IP carboplatin area under the curve 6 (IP carboplatin) versus once every 3 weeks IV paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 over 3 hours day 1, IP cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 2, and IP paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 day 8 (IP cisplatin). All participants received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks in cycles 2 to 22. RESULTS A total of 1,560 participants were enrolled and had 84.8 months of follow-up. The median PFS duration was 24.9 months in the IV carboplatin arm, 27.4 months in the IP carboplatin arm, and 26.2 months in the IP cisplatin arm. For the subgroup of 1,380 patients with stage II/III and residual disease of 1 cm or less, median PFS was 26.9 (IV-carboplatin), 28.7 (IP-carboplatin), and 27.8 months (IP cisplatin), respectively. Median PFS for patients with stage II/III and no residual disease was 35.9, 38.8, and 35.5 months, respectively. Median overall survival for all enrolled was 75.5, 78.9, and 72.9 months, respectively, and median overall survival for stage II/III with no gross residual disease was 98.8 months, 104.8 months, and not reached. Mean patient-reported Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy neurotoxicity scores (Gynecologic Oncology Group) were similar for all arms, but the mean Trial Outcome Index of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Ovary scores during chemotherapy were statistically worse in the IP cisplatin arm. CONCLUSION Compared with the IV carboplatin reference arm, the duration of PFS was not significantly increased with either IP regimen when combined with bevacizumab and was better tolerated than IP cisplatin.

Infrequent Pap screening is an important risk factor for cervical cancer. We studied the association between contraceptive methods, screening frequency, and cancer.Women (n=2004) enrolled in the cross-sectional Study to Understand Cervical Cancer Endpoints and Determinants (SUCCEED) underwent colposcopy to evaluate an abnormal Pap test. Questionnaire data were compared between those with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3/adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and those with invasive cancer to identify factors associated with cancer. Logistic regression was used to calculate age-stratified measures of association between contraceptive method and Pap frequency as well as tubal ligation (TL) and cancer risk.In all age groups, women with TL were more likely to have had no Pap screening in the previous 5 years compared to women using other contraception: 26-35 years (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.4-8.6; p0.001), 36-45 years (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.1-7.0; p0.001), and 46-55 years (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.9; p=0.050). Subjects with cancer (n=163) were more likely to have had a TL (41% vs. 21%, p0.001) than those with CIN 3/AIS (n=370). Age-stratified analyses showed increased odds of tubal ligation in women with cancer versus those with CIN 3/AIS between 25 and 45 years, with a significant increase in women 26 to 35 years old (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4-8.1; p=0.009). Adjusting for Pap frequency changed the effect only slightly, suggesting that increased risk was not fully mediated by lack of screening.Contraceptive type is associated with Pap screening. Women with TLs obtain less frequent Pap testing and may be at an increased risk for cervical cancer.