Search

Translation termination in bacteria requires that the stop codon be recognized by release factor RF1 or RF2, leading to hydrolysis of the ester bond between the peptide and tRNA on the ribosome. As a consequence, normal termination cannot proceed if the translated mRNA lacks a stop codon. In Escherichia coli, the ribosome rescue factor ArfA releases the nascent polypeptide from the stalled ribosome with the help of RF2 in a stop codon–independent manner. Interestingly, the reaction does not proceed if RF1 is instead provided, even though the structures of RF1 and RF2 are very similar. Here, we identified the regions of RF2 required for the ArfA-dependent ribosome rescue system. Introduction of hydrophobic residues from RF2 found at the interface between RF2 and ArfA into RF1 allowed RF1 to associate with the ArfA-ribosome complex to a certain extent but failed to promote peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis, whereas WT RF1 did not associate with the complex. We also identified the key residues required for the process after ribosome binding. Our findings provide a basis for understanding how the ArfA-ribosome complex is specifically recognized by RF2 and how RF2 undergoes a conformational change upon binding to the ArfA-ribosome complex.

A homolog of the bacterial ribosome rescue factor ArfB was identified in Arabidopsis thaliana. The factor, named AtArfB for Arabidopsis thaliana ArfB, showed ribosome rescue activity in both in vivo and in vitro assays based on the bacterial translation system. As has been shown for ArfB, the ribosome rescue activity of AtArfB was dependent on the GGQ motif, the crucial motif for the function of class I release factors and ArfB. The C-terminal region of AtArfB was also important for its function. The N-terminal region of AtArfB, which is absent in bacterial ArfB, functioned as a transit peptide for chloroplast targeting in tobacco cells. These results strongly suggest that AtArfB is a ribosome rescue factor that functions in chloroplasts.

A homolog of the bacterial ribosome rescue factor ArfB was identified in Arabidopsis thaliana. The factor, named AtArfB for Arabidopsis thaliana ArfB, showed ribosome rescue activity in both in vivo and in vitro assays based on the bacterial translation system. As has been shown for ArfB, the ribosome rescue activity of AtArfB was dependent on the GGQ motif, the crucial motif for the function of class I release factors and ArfB. The C-terminal region of AtArfB was also important for its function. The N-terminal region of AtArfB, which is absent in bacterial ArfB, functioned as a transit peptide for chloroplast targeting in tobacco cells. These results strongly suggest that AtArfB is a ribosome rescue factor that functions in chloroplasts.

Ribosomes often stall during protein synthesis in various situations in a cell, either unexpectedly or in a programmed fashion. While some of them remain stalled for gene regulation, many are rescued by some cellular systems. Ribosomes stalled at the 3' end of a truncated mRNA lacking a stop codon (non-stop mRNA) are rescued by trans-translation mediated by tmRNA (transfer-messenger RNA) and a partner protein, SmpB. Through trans-translation, a degradation tag is added to the C-termini of truncated polypeptides from a truncated mRNA to prevent them from accumulation in the cell. Trans-translation has crucial roles in a wide variety of cellular events, especially under stressful conditions. The trans-translation system is thought to be universally present in the bacterial domain, although it is not necessarily essential in all bacterial cells. It has recently been revealed that two other systems, one involving a small protein, ArfA, with RF2 and the other involving YaeJ (ArfB), a class I release factor homologue, operate to relieve ribosome stalling in Escherichia coli. Thus, many bacterial species would have multiple systems to cope with various kinds of stalled translation events.

Although trans-translation mediated by tmRNA-SmpB has long been known as the sole system to relieve bacterial stalled ribosomes, ArfA has recently been identified as an alternative factor for ribosome rescue in Escherichia coli. This process requires hydrolysis of nascent peptidyl-tRNA by RF2, which usually acts as a stop codon-specific peptide release factor. It poses a fascinating question of how ArfA and RF2 recognize and rescue the stalled ribosome. Here, we mapped the location of ArfA in the stalled ribosome by directed hydroxyl radical probing. It revealed an ArfA-binding site around the neck region of the 30S subunit in which the N- and C-terminal regions of ArfA are close to the decoding center and the mRNA entry channel, respectively. ArfA and RF2 sequentially enter the ribosome stalled in either the middle or 3′ end of mRNA, whereas RF2 induces a productive conformational change of ArfA only when ribosome is stalled at the 3′ end of mRNA. On the basis of these results, we propose that ArfA functions as the sensor to recognize the target ribosome after RF2 binding.

Summary The ribosomes stalled at the end of non-stop mRNAs must be rescued for productive cycles of cellular protein synthesis. Escherichia coli possesses at least three independent mechanisms that resolve non-productive translation complexes (NTCs). While tmRNA (SsrA) mediates trans-translation to terminate translation, ArfA (YhdL) and ArfB (YaeJ) induce hydrolysis of ribosome-tethered peptidyl-tRNAs. ArfB is a paralogue of the release factors (RFs) and directly catalyses the peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis within NTCs. In contrast, the mechanism of the ArfA action had remained obscure beyond its ability to bind to the ribosome. Here, we characterized the ArfA pathway of NTC resolution in vitro and identified RF2 as a factor that cooperates with ArfA to hydrolyse peptidyl-tRNAs located in the P-site of the stalled ribosome. This reaction required the GGQ (Gly–Gly–Gln) hydrolysis motif, but not the SPF (Ser–Pro–Phe) codon–recognition sequence, of RF2 and was stimulated by tRNAs. From these results we suggest that ArfA binds to the vacant A-site of the stalled ribosome with possible aid from association with a tRNA, and then recruits RF2, which hydrolyses peptidyl-tRNA in a GGQ motif-dependent but codon-independent manner. In support of this model, the ArfA-RF2 pathway did not act on the SecM-arrested ribosome, which contains an aminoacyl-tRNA in the A-site.

There are three classes of promoters for flagellar operons in Salmonella . Class 2 promoters are transcribed by σ 70 RNA polymerase in the presence of an essential activator, FlhD 4 C 2 , and activated by an auxiliary regulator, FliZ. Class 3 promoters are transcribed by σ 28 RNA polymerase and repressed by an anti-σ 28 factor, FlgM. σ 28 (FliA) and FliZ are encoded by the fliA and fliZ genes, respectively, which together constitute an operon transcribed in this order. This operon is transcribed from both class 2 and class 3 promoters, suggesting that it should be activated by its own product, σ 28 , even in the absence of FlhD 4 C 2 . However, σ 28 -dependent transcription occurs in vivo only in the presence of FlhD 4 C 2 , indicating that transcription from the class 2 promoter is a prerequisite to that from the class 3 promoter. In this study, we examined the effects of variously modified versions of the fliA regulatory region on transcription and translation of the fliA gene. We showed that FliA is not significantly translated from the class 3 transcript. In contrast, the 5′-terminal AU-rich sequence found in the class 2 transcript confers efficient fliA translation. Replacement of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence of the fliA gene with a better one improved fliA translation from the class 3 transcript. These results suggest that the 5′-terminal AU-rich sequence of the class 2 transcript may assist ribosome binding. FliZ was shown to be expressed from both the class 2 and class 3 transcripts.

Flagellar operons are divided into three classes with respect to their transcriptional hierarchy in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. The class 1 gene products FlhD and FlhC act together in an FlhD 4 C 2 heterohexamer, which binds upstream of the class 2 promoters to facilitate binding of RNA polymerase. In this study, we showed that flagellar expression was much reduced in the cells grown in poor medium compared to those grown in rich medium. This nutritional control was shown to be executed at a step after class 1 transcription. We isolated five Tn 5 insertion mutants in which the class 2 expression was derepressed in poor medium. These insertions were located in the ydiV ( cdgR ) gene or a gene just upstream of ydiV . The ydiV gene is known to encode an EAL domain protein and to act as a negative regulator of flagellar expression. Gene disruption and complementation analyses revealed that the ydiV gene is responsible for nutritional control. Expression analysis of the ydiV gene showed that its translation, but not transcription, was enhanced by growth in poor medium. The ydiV mutation did not have a significant effect on either the steady-state level of flhDC mRNA or that of FlhC protein. Purified YdiV protein was shown in vitro to bind to FlhD 4 C 2 through interaction with FlhD subunit and to inhibit its binding to the class 2 promoter, resulting in inhibition of FlhD 4 C 2 -dependent transcription. Taking these data together, we conclude that YdiV is a novel anti-FlhD 4 C 2 factor responsible for nutritional control of the flagellar regulon.

Accumulation of stalled ribosomes at the 3' end of mRNA without a stop codon (non-stop mRNA) is supposed to be toxic to bacterial cells. Escherichia coli has at least two distinct systems to rescue such stalled ribosomes: SsrA-dependent trans-translation and ArfA-dependent ribosome rescue. Combination of the ssrA and arfA mutations is synthetically lethal, suggesting the significance of ribosome rescue. In this study, we identified the E. coli yaeJ gene, encoding a peptide-release factor homologue with GGQ motif, as a multicopy suppressor of the lethal phenotype of ssrA arfA double mutant. The YaeJ protein was shown to bind to ribosomes. Both in vivo and in vitro, YaeJ showed the ribosome-rescue activity and promoted the hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA residing in the stalled ribosome. Missense mutation in the GGQ motif or deletion of the C-terminal unstructured tail abolished both the suppressor activity for ssrA arfA synthetic lethality and the ribosome-rescue activity, suggesting the importance of these structural features. On the basis of these observations, we propose that YaeJ acts as a stop codon-independent peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysing factor through binding to ribosomes stalled at the 3' end of non-stop mRNAs. It was also suggested that ArfA and YaeJ rescue the stalled ribosomes by distinct mechanisms.

Summary Although SsrA(tmRNA)-mediated trans-translation is thought to maintain the translation capacity of bacterial cells by rescuing ribosomes stalled on messenger RNA lacking an in-frame stop codon, single disruption of ssrA does not crucially hamper growth of Escherichia coli. Here, we identified YhdL (renamed ArfA for alternative ribosome-rescue factor) as a factor essential for the viability of E. coli in the absence of SsrA. The ssrA–arfA synthetic lethality was alleviated by SsrADD, an SsrA variant that adds a proteolysis-refractory tag through trans-translation, indicating that ArfA-deficient cells require continued translation, rather than subsequent proteolysis of the truncated polypeptide. In accordance with this notion, depletion of SsrA in the ΔarfA background led to reduced translation of a model protein without affecting transcription, and puromycin, a codon-independent mimic of aminoacyl-tRNA, rescued the bacterial growth under such conditions. That ArfA takes over the role of SsrA was suggested by the observation that its overexpression enabled detection of the polypeptide encoded by a model non-stop mRNA, which was otherwise SsrA-tagged and degraded. In vitro, purified ArfA acted on a ribosome-nascent chain complex to resolve the peptidyl-tRNA. These results indicate that ArfA rescues the ribosome stalled at the 3′ end of a non-stop mRNA without involving trans-translation.

Background: We have shown recently that read-through of a normal stop codon by a suppressor tRNA in specific genes possessing a Rho-independent terminator leads to SsrA-mediated tagging of extended proteins in Escherichia coli cells. Miscoding antibiotics such as kanamycin and streptomycin reduce translational fidelity by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit. The aim of the present study was to address how miscoding antibiotics affect the read-through of stop codons and SsrA-mediated protein tagging. Results: Miscoding antibiotics caused translational read-through of stop codons when added to the culture medium at sublethal concentrations. Under the same conditions, the drugs enhanced SsrA-mediated tagging of bulk cellular proteins, as observed in cells carrying an ochre suppressor tRNA. Translational read-through products generated from the crp gene in the presence of the antibiotics was efficiently tagged by the SsrA system, presumably because the ribosome reached the 3′ end of the mRNA defined by the terminator hairpin. The SsrA-defective cells were more sensitive to the miscoding antibiotics compared to the wild-type cells. Conclusion: We conclude that the SsrA system contributes to the survival of cells by dealing with translational errors in the presence of low concentrations of miscoding antibiotics.

Backgrounds: Bacterial SsrA RNA (also known as tmRNA or 10Sa RNA) mediates the addition of a short peptide tag to the C-terminus of the nascent polypeptide when a ribosome is stalled at the 3′ end of an mRNA lacking a stop codon. This process, called trans-translation, rescues the stalled ribosome and ensures degradation of tagged polypeptides by ATP-dependent proteases. To fully understand the physiological roles of SsrA RNA, it is essential to know how endogenous mRNA targets for the SsrA system are generated in cells. The aim of the present study is to examine how translational readthrough by suppressor tRNAs affects trans-translation in Escherichia coli. Results: We demonstrated that SsrA tagging of bulk cellular proteins was significantly enhanced by an ochre or an amber suppressor tRNA. Western blot analysis of proteins produced from specific genes possessing a Rho-independent terminator revealed that readthrough at the normal stop codon leads to an efficient tagging and proteolysis of the extended proteins. Size analyses of both protein and mRNA suggested that tagging of extended proteins occurs because ribosome passing through the normal stop codon presumably reach the 3′ end of mRNA defined by the transcription terminator hairpin. The inhibitory effect of ssrA mutation on cell growth was markedly amplified in cells with an ochre suppressor tRNA. Conclusion: The present finding suggests that the SsrA system contributes to scavenge errors and/or problems caused by translational readthrough that occurs typically in the presence of a suppressor tRNA.

Translation terminates at stop codon. Without stop codon, ribosome cannot terminate translation properly and reaches and stalls at the 3'-end of the mRNA lacking stop codon. Bacterial tmRNA-mediated trans-translation releases such stalled ribosome and targets the protein product to degradation by adding specific "degradation tag." Recently two alternative ribosome rescue factors, ArfA (YhdL) and ArfB (YaeJ), have been found in Escherichia coli. These three ribosome rescue systems are different each other in terms of molecular mechanism of ribosome rescue and their activity, but they are mutually related and co-operate to maintain the translation system in shape. This suggests the biological significance of ribosome rescue.

SsrA RNA of Escherichia coli , also known as 10Sa RNA or tmRNA, acts both as tRNA and mRNA when ribosomes are paused at the 3′ end of an mRNA lacking a stop codon. This process, referred to as trans ‐translation, leads to the addition of a short peptide tag to the C‐terminus of the incomplete nascent polypeptide. The tagged polypeptide is then degraded by C‐terminal‐specific proteases. Here, we focused on endogenous targets for the SsrA system and on a potential regulatory role of SsrA RNA. First, we show that trans ‐translation events occur frequently in normally growing E.coli cells. More specifically, we report that the lacI mRNA encoding Lac repressor (LacI) is a specific natural target for trans ‐translation. The binding of LacI to the lac operators results in truncated lacI mRNAs that are, in turn, recognized by the SsrA system. The SsrA‐mediated tagging and proteolysis of LacI appears to play a role in cellular adaptation to lactose availability by supporting a rapid induction of lac operon expression.

Background: The plasmid R100 encodes tra genes essential for conjugal DNA transfer in Escherichia coli. Genetic evidence suggests that the traJ gene encodes a positive regulator for the traY-I operon, which includes almost all the tra genes located downstream of traJ. The molecular mechanism of regulation by TraJ, however, is not yet understood. traY is the most proximal gene in the traY-I operon. TraY promotes DNA transfer by binding to a site, sbyA, near the origin of transfer. TraY is suggested to have another role in regulation of the traY-I operon, since it binds to two other sites, named sbyB and sbyC, located in the region preceding traY-I. Results: Using a traY-lacZ fusion gene, we showed that the traY-I operon was expressed only in the presence of traJ. The TraJ-dependent expression of traY-I required the E. coliarcA gene, which encodes a host factor required for conjugation. TraJ-dependent transcription occurred from a promoter (named pY) located upstream of traY-I. The isolated TraJ protein was found to bind to a dyad symmetry sequence, named sbj (specific binding site of TraJ), which existed in the intergenic region between traJ and traY-I. We also demonstrated that TraY repressed the TraJ-dependent expression of traY-I at the TraY binding sites, sbyB and sbyC, which overlapped with pY. Conclusions: TraJ is a protein which binds to the sbj site in the region upstream of the promoter pY and positively regulates expression of the traY-I operon in the presence of the E. coliarcA gene. Since sbj is located 93 bp upstream of pY in the intergenic region between traJ and traY-I, TraJ presumably contacts with a transcription apparatus to promote transcription from pY. TraY, which is known to activate the initiation of conjugal DNA transfer, has a new role in the transcriptional autoregulation of traY-I expression. At levels which are sufficient to initiate conjugal DNA transfer, TraY represses traY-I transcription in the presence of TraJ.

The ribosomes stalled at the end of non-stop mRNAs must be rescued for productive cycles of cellular protein synthesis. Escherichia coli possesses at least three independent mechanisms that resolve non-productive translation complexes (NTCs). While tmRNA (SsrA) mediates trans-translation to terminate translation, ArfA (YhdL) and ArfB (YaeJ) induce hydrolysis of ribosome-tethered peptidyl-tRNAs. ArfB is a paralogue of the release factors (RFs) and directly catalyses the peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis within NTCs. In contrast, the mechanism of the ArfA action had remained obscure beyond its ability to bind to the ribosome. Here, we characterized the ArfA pathway of NTC resolution in vitro and identified RF2 as a factor that cooperates with ArfA to hydrolyse peptidyl-tRNAs located in the P-site of the stalled ribosome. This reaction required the GGQ (Gly-Gly-Gln) hydrolysis motif, but not the SPF (Ser-Pro-Phe) codon-recognition sequence, of RF2 and was stimulated by tRNAs. From these results we suggest that ArfA binds to the vacant A-site of the stalled ribosome with possible aid from association with a tRNA, and then recruits RF2, which hydrolyses peptidyl-tRNA in a GGQ motif-dependent but codon-independent manner. In support of this model, the ArfA-RF2 pathway did not act on the SecM-arrested ribosome, which contains an aminoacyl-tRNA in the A-site.

We developed a purified system for reproducing the nicking reaction at the site 59 base pairs upstream of the TraY protein binding site, sbyA, in the oriT region of plasmid R100. Nicking at oriT occurred efficiently in the presence of the plasmid-encoded proteins, TraI and TraY, integration host factor (IHF), and Mg2+, but inefficiently in the presence of the TraI protein and Mg2+. The products were complex DNA molecules with a protein covalently linked with the 5' end of the nick in the strand, which is supposed to be transferred during conjugation. The same complex DNA molecules were formed in the presence of the TraI protein alone, indicating that the protein attached at the 5' end of the nick is the TraI protein. Stimulation of the nicking reaction by the TraY protein and by IHF, whose binding site has been mapped between the nicking site and sbyA, indicates that DNA bending is important in the formation of the complex including the TraI and TraY proteins at oriT.

Although co-translational biological processes attract much attention, no general and easy method has been available to detect cellular nascent polypeptide chains, which we propose to call collectively a "nascentome." We developed a method to selectively detect polypeptide portions of cellular polypeptidyl-tRNAs and used it to study the generality of the quality control reactions that rescue dead-end translation complexes. To detect nascent polypeptides, having their growing ends covalently attached to a tRNA, cellular extracts are separated by SDS-PAGE in two dimensions, first with the peptidyl-tRNA ester bonds preserved and subsequently after their in-gel cleavage. Pulse-labeled nascent polypeptides of Escherichia coli form a characteristic line below the main diagonal line, because each of them had contained a tRNA of nearly uniform size in the first-dimension electrophoresis but not in the second-dimension. The detection of nascent polypeptides, separately from any translation-completed polypeptides or degradation products thereof, allows us to follow their fates to gain deeper insights into protein biogenesis and quality control pathways. It was revealed that polypeptidyl-tRNAs were significantly stabilized in E. coli upon dysfunction of the tmRNA-ArfA ribosome-rescuing system, whose function had only been studied previously using model constructs. Our results suggest that E. coli cells are intrinsically producing aberrant translation products, which are normally eliminated by the ribosome-rescuing mechanisms.

Ribosomes translating mRNA without an in-frame stop codon (non-stop mRNA) stall at its 3' end. In eubacteria, such ribosomes are rescued by SsrA-mediated trans-translation. Recently, we have shown that Escherichia coli ArfA (formerly YhdL) also rescues stalled ribosomes by a mechanism distinct from that of trans-translation. Synthetic lethality phenotype of ssrA arfA double mutants suggests that accumulation of stalled ribosomes is deleterious to E. coli cells. In this report, we show that the expression of ArfA is tightly regulated by the system involving trans-translation. Both premature transcription termination and specific cleavage by RNase III were programmed at the specific sites within the arfA open reading frame (ORF) and produced arfA non-stop mRNA. C-terminally truncated ArfA protein synthesized from arfA non-stop mRNA was tagged through SsrA-mediated trans-translation and degraded in wild type cell. In the absence of SsrA, however, C-terminally truncated ArfA escaped from degradation and had a function to rescue stalled ribosomes. Full-length ArfA produced only when arfA mRNA escapes from both premature transcription termination and RNase III cleavage was unstable. From these results, we illustrate a regulatory model in which ArfA is expressed only when it is needed, namely, when the ribosome rescue activity of trans-translation system is insufficient to support cell viability. This sophisticated regulatory mechanism suggests that the ArfA-mediated ribosome rescue is a backup system for trans-translation.

There are three classes of promoters for flagellar operons in Salmonella. Class 2 promoters are transcribed by σ(70) RNA polymerase in the presence of an essential activator, FlhD(4)C(2), and activated by an auxiliary regulator, FliZ. Class 3 promoters are transcribed by σ(28) RNA polymerase and repressed by an anti-σ(28) factor, FlgM. σ(28) (FliA) and FliZ are encoded by the fliA and fliZ genes, respectively, which together constitute an operon transcribed in this order. This operon is transcribed from both class 2 and class 3 promoters, suggesting that it should be activated by its own product, σ(28), even in the absence of FlhD(4)C(2). However, σ(28)-dependent transcription occurs in vivo only in the presence of FlhD(4)C(2), indicating that transcription from the class 2 promoter is a prerequisite to that from the class 3 promoter. In this study, we examined the effects of variously modified versions of the fliA regulatory region on transcription and translation of the fliA gene. We showed that FliA is not significantly translated from the class 3 transcript. In contrast, the 5'-terminal AU-rich sequence found in the class 2 transcript confers efficient fliA translation. Replacement of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence of the fliA gene with a better one improved fliA translation from the class 3 transcript. These results suggest that the 5'-terminal AU-rich sequence of the class 2 transcript may assist ribosome binding. FliZ was shown to be expressed from both the class 2 and class 3 transcripts.

Accumulation of stalled ribosomes at the 3' end of mRNA without a stop codon (non-stop mRNA) is supposed to be toxic to bacterial cells. Escherichia coli has at least two distinct systems to rescue such stalled ribosomes: SsrA-dependent trans-translation and ArfA-dependent ribosome rescue. Combination of the ssrA and arfA mutations is synthetically lethal, suggesting the significance of ribosome rescue. In this study, we identified the E. coli yaeJ gene, encoding a peptide-release factor homologue with GGQ motif, as a multicopy suppressor of the lethal phenotype of ssrA arfA double mutant. The YaeJ protein was shown to bind to ribosomes. Both in vivo and in vitro, YaeJ showed the ribosome-rescue activity and promoted the hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA residing in the stalled ribosome. Missense mutation in the GGQ motif or deletion of the C-terminal unstructured tail abolished both the suppressor activity for ssrA arfA synthetic lethality and the ribosome-rescue activity, suggesting the importance of these structural features. On the basis of these observations, we propose that YaeJ acts as a stop codon-independent peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysing factor through binding to ribosomes stalled at the 3' end of non-stop mRNAs. It was also suggested that ArfA and YaeJ rescue the stalled ribosomes by distinct mechanisms.

Although SsrA(tmRNA)-mediated trans-translation is thought to maintain the translation capacity of bacterial cells by rescuing ribosomes stalled on messenger RNA lacking an in-frame stop codon, single disruption of ssrA does not crucially hamper growth of Escherichia coli. Here, we identified YhdL (renamed ArfA for alternative ribosome-rescue factor) as a factor essential for the viability of E. coli in the absence of SsrA. The ssrA-arfA synthetic lethality was alleviated by SsrA(DD) , an SsrA variant that adds a proteolysis-refractory tag through trans-translation, indicating that ArfA-deficient cells require continued translation, rather than subsequent proteolysis of the truncated polypeptide. In accordance with this notion, depletion of SsrA in the ΔarfA background led to reduced translation of a model protein without affecting transcription, and puromycin, a codon-independent mimic of aminoacyl-tRNA, rescued the bacterial growth under such conditions. That ArfA takes over the role of SsrA was suggested by the observation that its overexpression enabled detection of the polypeptide encoded by a model non-stop mRNA, which was otherwise SsrA-tagged and degraded. In vitro, purified ArfA acted on a ribosome-nascent chain complex to resolve the peptidyl-tRNA. These results indicate that ArfA rescues the ribosome stalled at the 3' end of a non-stop mRNA without involving trans-translation.

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain LT2 possesses two nonallelic structural genes, fliC and fljB , for flagellin, the component protein of flagellar filaments. Flagellar phase variation occurs by alternative expression of these two genes. This is controlled by the inversion of a DNA segment, called the H segment, containing the fljB promoter. H inversion occurs by site-specific recombination between inverted repetitious sequences flanking the H segment. This recombination has been shown in vivo and in vitro to be mediated by a DNA invertase, Hin, whose gene is located within the H segment. However, a search of the complete genomic sequence revealed that LT2 possesses another DNA invertase gene that is located adjacent to another invertible DNA segment within a resident prophage, Fels-2. Here, we named this gene fin . We constructed hin and fin disruption mutants from LT2 and examined their phase variation abilities. The hin disruption mutant could still undergo flagellar phase variation, indicating that Hin is not the sole DNA invertase responsible for phase variation. Although the fin disruption mutant could undergo phase variation, fin hin double mutants could not. These results clearly indicate that both Hin and Fin contribute to flagellar phase variation in LT2. We further showed that a phase-stable serovar, serovar Abortusequi, which is known to possess a naturally occurring hin mutation, lacks Fels-2, which ensures the phase stability in this serovar.

Recent studies on endogenous SsrA-tagged proteins have revealed that the tagging could occur at a position corresponding to the normal termination codon. During the study of SsrA-mediated Lacl tagging (Abo et al., EMBO J, 2000 19:3762-3769), we found that a variant Lacl (Lacl deltaC1) lacking the last C-terminal amino acid residue is efficiently tagged in a stop codon-dependent manner. SsrA tagging of Lacl deltaC1 occurred efficiently without Lacl binding to the lac operators at any one of three stop codons. The C-terminal (R)LESG peptide of Lacl deltaC1 was shown to trigger the SsrA tagging of an unrelated protein (CRP) when fused to its C terminus. Mass spectrometry analysis of the purified fusion proteins revealed that SsrA tagging occurs at a position corresponding to the termination codon. The alteration of the amino acid sequence but not the nucleotide sequence of the C-terminal portion eliminated the tagging. We also showed that the tagging-provoking sequences cause an efficient translational readthrough at UGA but not UAA codons. In addition, we found that C-terminal dipeptides known to induce an efficient translation readthrough could cause an efficient tagging at stop codons. We conclude that the amino acid sequence of nascent polypeptide prior to stop codons is a major determinant for the SsrA tagging at all three stop codons.

We have shown recently that read-through of a normal stop codon by a suppressor tRNA in specific genes possessing a Rho-independent terminator leads to SsrA-mediated tagging of extended proteins in Escherichia coli cells. Miscoding antibiotics such as kanamycin and streptomycin reduce translational fidelity by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit. The aim of the present study was to address how miscoding antibiotics affect the read-through of stop codons and SsrA-mediated protein tagging.Miscoding antibiotics caused translational read-through of stop codons when added to the culture medium at sublethal concentrations. Under the same conditions, the drugs enhanced SsrA-mediated tagging of bulk cellular proteins, as observed in cells carrying an ochre suppressor tRNA. Translational read-through products generated from the crp gene in the presence of the antibiotics was efficiently tagged by the SsrA system, presumably because the ribosome reached the 3' end of the mRNA defined by the terminator hairpin. The SsrA-defective cells were more sensitive to the miscoding antibiotics compared to the wild-type cells.We conclude that the SsrA system contributes to the survival of cells by dealing with translational errors in the presence of low concentrations of miscoding antibiotics.

Bacterial SsrA RNA (also known as tmRNA or 10Sa RNA) mediates the addition of a short peptide tag to the C-terminus of the nascent polypeptide when a ribosome is stalled at the 3' end of an mRNA lacking a stop codon. This process, called trans-translation, rescues the stalled ribosome and ensures degradation of tagged polypeptides by ATP-dependent proteases. To fully understand the physiological roles of SsrA RNA, it is essential to know how endogenous mRNA targets for the SsrA system are generated in cells. The aim of the present study is to examine how translational readthrough by suppressor tRNAs affects trans-translation in Escherichia coli.We demonstrated that SsrA tagging of bulk cellular proteins was significantly enhanced by an ochre or an amber suppressor tRNA. Western blot analysis of proteins produced from specific genes possessing a Rho-independent terminator revealed that readthrough at the normal stop codon leads to an efficient tagging and proteolysis of the extended proteins. Size analyses of both protein and mRNA suggested that tagging of extended proteins occurs because ribosome passing through the normal stop codon presumably reach the 3' end of mRNA defined by the transcription terminator hairpin. The inhibitory effect of ssrA mutation on cell growth was markedly amplified in cells with an ochre suppressor tRNA.The present finding suggests that the SsrA system contributes to scavenge errors and/or problems caused by translational readthrough that occurs typically in the presence of a suppressor tRNA.

The trinucleotide repeats (CAG)(n) and (CGG)(n) have been shown to be expanded in responsible genes of several human hereditary neurological disorders. In studies of mice, we previously identified two homologous single-stranded (ss)(CAG) and ss(CGG) repeat-binding proteins, CAGER-1 (44 kDa) and CAGER-2 (40 kDa) (CAG-element-recognizing proteins). The specific binding activities of these proteins were predominantly detected in the mouse brain. We have isolated the cDNAs encoding CAGER-1 and CAGER-2 and found that they were identical to previously reported cDNAs for Puralpha and Purbeta, respectively. Puralpha of 28 kDa was previously identified as a replication-origin-binding protein that is ubiquitously expressed in proliferating cells. We show that the transcripts of CAGERs increase after birth and are detected at high levels in the adult mouse brain but at very low or virtually undetectable levels in other mouse tissues. Biochemical properties and molecular weights are different between CAGERs and Puralpha/beta. Immunostaining with specific antibodies against CAGERs indicates that CAGERs in the mouse brain reside in nonproliferating neurons but not in proliferating glia. We conclude that CAGERs and Puralpha/beta are unrelated proteins, and CAGERs are neuronal single-stranded sequence-binding proteins in the mouse brain. Misassignment of cDNAs is described.

We have previously identified three sites, named sbi, ihfA, and sbyA, specifically recognized or bound by the TraI, IHF, and TraY proteins, respectively; these sites are involved in nicking at the origin of transfer, oriT, of plasmid R100. In the region next to these sites, there exists the sbm region, which consists of four sites, sbmA, sbmB, sbmC, and sbmD; this region is specifically bound by the TraM protein, which is required for DNA transfer. Between sbmB and sbmC in this region, there exists another IHF-binding site, ihfB. The region containing all of these sites is located in the proximity of the tra region and is referred to as the oriT region. To determine whether these sites are important for DNA transfer in vivo, we constructed plasmids with various mutations in the oriT region and tested their mobilization in the presence of R100-1, a transfer-proficient mutant of R100. Plasmids with either deletions in the sbi-ihfA-sbyA region or substitution mutations introduced into each specific site in this region were mobilized at a greatly reduced frequency, showing that all of these sites are essential for DNA transfer. By binding to ihfA, IHF, which is known to bend DNA, may be involved in the formation of a complex (which may be called oriT-some) consisting of TraI, IHF, and TraY that efficiently introduces a nick at oriT. Plasmids with either deletions in the sbm-ihfB region or substitution mutations introduced into each specific site in this region were mobilized at a reduced frequency, showing that this region is also important for DNA transfer. By binding to ihfB, IHF may also be involved in the formation of another complex (which may be called the TraM-IHF complex) consisting of TraM and IHF that ensures DNA transfer with a high level of efficiency. Several-base-pair insertions into the positions between sbyA and sbmA affected the frequency of transfer in a manner dependent upon the number of base pairs, indicating that the phasing between sbyA and sbmA is important. This in turn suggests that both oriT-some and the TraM-IHF complex should be in an appropriate position spatially to facilitate DNA transfer.

The product of the traM gene of plasmid R100 was purified as the TraM-collagen-beta-galactosidase fusion protein (TraM*) by using a beta-galactosidase-specific affinity column, and the TraM portion of TraM* (TraM') was separated by collagenolysis. Both the TraM* and TraM' proteins were found to bind specifically to a broad region preceding the traM gene. This region (designated sbm) was located within the nonconserved region in oriT among conjugative plasmids related to R100. The region seems to contain four core binding sites (designated sbmA, sbmB, sbmC, and sbmD), each consisting of a similar number of nucleotides and including a homologous 15-bp sequence. This result, together with the observation that the TraM* protein was located in the membrane fraction, indicates the possibility that the TraM protein has a function in anchoring the oriT region of R100 at the sbm sites to the membrane pore, through which the single-stranded DNA is transferred to the recipient. sbmC and sbmD, each of which contained a characteristic inverted repeat sequence, overlapped with the promoter region for the traM gene. This suggests that the expression of the traM gene may be regulated by its own product.